[Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DEFERRED Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(dwall...@redhat.c | |om) | Last Closed||2010-12-03 04:14:45 --- Comment #38 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-12-03 04:14:45 EST --- I'm closing the bug because of no activity in a long period. Please reopen or open a new one when this package is ready for review again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225636] Merge Review: cairo-java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225636 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||akurt...@redhat.com Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2010-12-03 04:17:25 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-12-03 04:17:25 EST --- Deprecated now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226007] Merge Review: libgconf-java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226007 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||akurt...@redhat.com Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2010-12-03 04:19:01 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-12-03 04:19:01 EST --- Deprecated now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226025] Merge Review: libgtk-java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226025 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||akurt...@redhat.com Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2010-12-03 04:20:43 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-12-03 04:20:43 EST --- Deprecated now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226011] Merge Review: libglade-java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226011 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||akurt...@redhat.com Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2010-12-03 04:19:52 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-12-03 04:19:52 EST --- Deprecated now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226057] Merge Review: libvte-java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226057 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||akurt...@redhat.com Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2010-12-03 04:21:29 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-12-03 04:21:29 EST --- Deprecated now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659368] Review Request: luabind - A library that helps create bindings between C++ and Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659368 --- Comment #2 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich kr...@land.ru 2010-12-03 06:10:24 EST --- Hm. Unable to build, with lates testing boost: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2641074 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659663] New: Review Request: python-netcf - python binding for netcf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-netcf - python binding for netcf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659663 Summary: Review Request: python-netcf - python binding for netcf Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ljons...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://lsjostro.fedorapeople.org/python-netcf.spec SRPM URL: http://lsjostro.fedorapeople.org/python-netcf-0.1.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: python-netcf is a Python binding around netcf. This is my first package so I will be needing a sponsor! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551274] Review Request: akonadi-googledata -Akonadi resources to sync google calendar events and contacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274 Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich kr...@land.ru changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kr...@land.ru --- Comment #27 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich kr...@land.ru 2010-12-03 07:12:00 EST --- Thomas, if you want to make request instead of Mario Ceresa, you should open new bug entry and mark this one as dublicate. But befor you'l do that: You not need to mark boost as Requires, as it akonadi dependece. You not need to mark akonadi as Requires, as you have akonadi-devel in BuilRequires and it will be added automaticaly. It does not compiled on my F14 machine. Logs: http://fpaste.org/KCco/ You not need to define BuildRoot tag on current Fedora releases until you want this package in EPEL. You not need %clean section on current Fedora releases until you want this package in EPEL. You not need rm -rf of buildroot in the begin of %install section on current Fedora releases until you want this package in EPEL. Just common sence: I don't think it is a good idea to use first person in description (I highly recommend... and so on). And I will take thise review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655601] Review Request: jing-trang - Schema validation and conversion based on RELAX NG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655601 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-12-03 07:15:54 EST --- Package seems good now, builds fine and is all in all very nice :-) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551274] Review Request: akonadi-googledata -Akonadi resources to sync google calendar events and contacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274 --- Comment #28 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich kr...@land.ru 2010-12-03 07:18:10 EST --- You not need to mark boost as Requires, as it akonadi dependece. Ah, ok, It is a akonadi-googledata dependence too. But still, you not need it as you will get it automaticaly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629443] Review Request: jackson - A JSON-processor package in Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629443 --- Comment #3 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2010-12-03 07:34:29 EST --- Are you still going to do the package or should I just close the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619799] Review Request: mingw32-pcre - Perl-compatible regular expression library.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619799 Andrew Beekhof abeek...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2010-12-03 07:39:44 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Beekhof abeek...@redhat.com 2010-12-03 07:39:44 EST --- Imported, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629717] Review Request: mingw32-netcf - Cross-platform network configuration library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629717 Andrew Beekhof abeek...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED CC||abeek...@redhat.com Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2010-12-03 07:42:29 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Beekhof abeek...@redhat.com 2010-12-03 07:42:29 EST --- The matahari team no longer has a need for this package. Someone else is free to reopen if they wish to maintain a windows port. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 551274] Review Request: akonadi-googledata -Akonadi resources to sync google calendar events and contacts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274 --- Comment #29 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich kr...@land.ru 2010-12-03 07:45:33 EST --- (In reply to comment #27) It does not compiled on my F14 machine. Logs: http://fpaste.org/KCco/ Add explicitly in BuildRequires version for libgcal-devel =0.9.6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634614] Review Request: mingw32-srvany - Utility for creating a service from any MinGW Windows binary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634614 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Beekhof abeek...@redhat.com 2010-12-03 07:45:39 EST --- Done Spec file is in the same location, updated SRPM is: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/beekhof/matahari/fedora-13/SRPMS/mingw32-srvany-1.0-4.fc13.src.rpm Sorry for the delay -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225643] Merge Review: classpathx-jaf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225643 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||akurt...@redhat.com Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2010-12-03 07:51:36 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2010-12-03 07:51:36 EST --- Deprecated now. It has been obsoleted by java-1.5.0-gcj for a long time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659679] Review Request: Sigar - System Information Gatherer And Reporter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659679 Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659679] New: Review Request: Sigar - System Information Gatherer And Reporter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Sigar - System Information Gatherer And Reporter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659679 Summary: Review Request: Sigar - System Information Gatherer And Reporter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: and...@beekhof.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: The Sigar API provides a portable interface for gathering system information such as: - System memory, swap, CPU, load average, uptime, logins - Per-process memory, CPU, credential info, state, arguments, environment, open files - File system detection and metrics - Network interface detection, configuration info and metrics - Network route and connection tables This information is available in most operating systems, but each OS has their own way(s) providing it. SIGAR provides developers with one API to access this information regardless of the underlying platform. SPEC: http://www.clusterlabs.org/~beekhof/sigar.spec SRPM: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/beekhof/matahari/fedora-13/SRPMS/sigar-1.6.4-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659663] Review Request: python-netcf - python binding for netcf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659663 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629717] Review Request: mingw32-netcf - Cross-platform network configuration library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629717 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658234] Review Request: gdal-grass - Standalone GRASS 6 Drivers for GDAL and OGR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658234
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
--- Comment #2 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2010-12-03 08:03:13 EST
---
grasspath is statically set to GRASS version 6.4. The BRs only require it to
be 6.3. The specific versions are also likely not necessary, since no supported
version of Fedora ships a lower one. I don't know about EPEL though. You can
also drop BR grass-libs, since grass-devel requires it.
RPM will create all your Requires itself, so you don't need them. You'll only
need GRASS as Require, since the libraries are in an independent package, I
think.
Don't mix %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT on your spec files. Just stick with
either. The preferred build root syntax is also the first one from this list:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#BuildRoot_tag
The -n option is not necessary for %setup, since the package is exactly called
as expected. Please replace names and paths with %{name} and %{_bindir} in
%configure. It seems to me, the configure options are not needed, besides
--with-autoload, maybe.
Drop the last paragraph from the description, as it is of no interest for the
user. Maybe even the second too.
The README file only contains information about installation, so it should not
be included. The files section can also be simplified to %{_libdir}/%{name}
instead of the three lines starting with %{_libdir}.
I didn't look into the install, post and postun sections yet.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634614] Review Request: mingw32-srvany - Utility for creating a service from any MinGW Windows binary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634614 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2010-12-03 08:29:25 EST --- Ok, good. I don't see any other issues so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 649425] Review Request: kaudiocreator - Program for ripping and encoding Audio-CDs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649425 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-03 09:04:37 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659370] Review Request: python-tgmochikit - MochiKit JavaScript library packaged for TurboGears widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659370 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-03 09:04:58 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 596593] Review Request: ibus-table-chinese - Chinese tables for IBus-Table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-03 09:04:06 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620112] Review Request: udpxy - UDP-to-HTTP multicast traffic relay daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620112 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-03 09:14:35 EST --- There's a reason we ask that you increase release for every change and spin a new package, you know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620112] Review Request: udpxy - UDP-to-HTTP multicast traffic relay daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620112 --- Comment #6 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2010-12-03 09:30:49 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) There's a reason we ask that you increase release for every change and spin a new package, you know. OK. I thought that I should do this when review begins but review not started yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 620191] Review Request: clawsker - Dialog to edit Claws Mail's hidden preferences
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620191 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-03 09:28:18 EST --- Germán, just so you know, I'm trying to find people to review packages. I haven't the time to review all of them myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659679] Review Request: Sigar - System Information Gatherer And Reporter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659679 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jrez...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659679] Review Request: Sigar - System Information Gatherer And Reporter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659679 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jrez...@redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650181] Review Request: tkabber-plugins - Additional plugins for tkabber
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650181 --- Comment #2 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich kr...@land.ru 2010-12-03 09:54:32 EST --- Peter, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645764] Review Request: django-addons - to add plugging functionality in your projects easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645764 --- Comment #20 from Domingo Becker domingobec...@gmail.com 2010-12-03 09:53:49 EST --- New spec and srpm to fix the Django version number requirement in el5. Spec URL: http://beckerde.fedorapeople.org/transifex/django-addons.spec SRPM URL: http://beckerde.fedorapeople.org/transifex/django-addons-0.6.4-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659679] Review Request: Sigar - System Information Gatherer And Reporter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659679
--- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2010-12-03 10:11:26
EST ---
rpmlint output:
rpmlint sigar.spec
sigar.spec:6: W: non-standard-group Libraries
not ok
sigar.spec:10: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
sigar.spec:10: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
sigar.spec:10: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
sigar.spec:44: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
sigar.spec:44: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
ok
sigar.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: sigar-1.6.4.tbz2
not ok
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.
rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/sigar-1.6.4-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm
sigar.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C SIGAR
ok
sigar.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US uptime - optime, up
time, up-time
sigar.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US logins - losing, login,
loins
ok
sigar.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Libraries
sigar.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.6.0-1 ['1.6.4-1.fc14',
'1.6.4-1']
please fix
sigar.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libsigar.so libsigar.so
unversioned library
sigar.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libsigar.so e...@glibc_2.2.5
should be fixed
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings.
Name: ok
Version release: ok
Summary: ok
Group: not ok - should be System Environment/Libraries
License: ok, ASL 2.0
URL: ok (redirects to http://support.hyperic.com/display/SIGAR/Home)
Source: not ok
Source MD5: can't check - no 1.6.4 binaries at provided URL
Consistent usage of macros: ok
Buildroot: ok (not required anymore but Sigar should go to older releases too)
Devel subpackage: ok
Non-devel subpackage contains .so: yes, shared lib should be properly
versioned, .so symlink should go to -devel subpackage!!!
ldconfig snippet: not ok, missing
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Shared_libraries
Documentation: missing LICENSE NOTICE AUTHORS from upstreams tarball - please
fix at least LICENSE - the must item
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659746] New: Review Request: dee - Model to synchronize multiple instances over DBus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dee - Model to synchronize multiple instances over DBus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659746 Summary: Review Request: dee - Model to synchronize multiple instances over DBus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: awill...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/dee.spec SRPM URL: http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/dee-0.4.2-1.aw_fc15.src.rpm Description: Libdee is a library that uses DBus to provide objects allowing you to create Model-View-Controller type programs across DBus. It also consists of utility objects which extend DBus allowing for peer-to-peer discoverability of known objects without needing a central registrar. This is part of Ubuntu's Aytana stuff, and is a dependency for Unity, which I'm trying to work towards packaging. Notes: there's some small licensing issues I filed an upstream bug for: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dee/+bug/684738 . Note that the source is dual LGPLv3 and GPLv3, but none of the GPLv3 bits (test and example binaries) are actually installed into the binary packages, so just LGPLv3 is the appropriate License: tag. rpmlint: [ad...@adam SPECS]$ rpmlint dee.spec dee.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean dee.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag dee.spec: W: no-%clean-section 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. these are all okay for F13+ (F12 is now EOL). [ad...@adam SPECS]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/dee-0.4.2-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm dee.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US discoverability - discover ability, discover-ability, discoverable I say it's a word so it is a word! (Comes from upstream, actually. I ripped off their description.) [ad...@adam SPECS]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/dee-devel-0.4.2-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659746] Review Request: dee - Model to synchronize multiple instances over DBus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659746 --- Comment #1 from Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com 2010-12-03 10:33:27 EST --- one improvement here would be to use the in-built test suite, but I'd have to package dbus-test-runner too, for that. may do that if I get time later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583869] Review Request: python-plwm - python module for making window managers for keyboard-loving programmers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583869 Bug Zapper tri...@lists.fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(sherry...@gmail.c | |om) | Last Closed||2010-12-03 10:40:09 --- Comment #9 from Bug Zapper tri...@lists.fedoraproject.org 2010-12-03 10:40:09 EST --- Fedora 12 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-12-02. Fedora 12 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659756] New: Review Request: libnfsidmap - Library that handles mapping between names and ids for NFSv4.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libnfsidmap - Library that handles mapping between names and ids for NFSv4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659756 Summary: Review Request: libnfsidmap - Library that handles mapping between names and ids for NFSv4. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ste...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://steved.fedorapeople.org/libnfsidmap/libnfsidmap.spec SRPM URL: http://steved.fedorapeople.org/libnfsidmap/libnfsidmap-0.23-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: This library used by the rpc.idmapd daemon, which is part of nfs-utils, to convert NFSv4 uid and gid strings into actual UIDs and GIDs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656010] Review Request: libsrtp - An implementation of the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656010
--- Comment #2 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2010-12-03
10:59:25 EST ---
Honestly, I'm not sure how to get any sort of sane revision for the tree from
cvs. If you know how, I'd be happy to add it.
The exit() call is in crypto_kernel_status (in crypto/kernel/crypto_kernel.c)
/* for each cipher type, describe and test */
while(ctype != NULL) {
printf(cipher: %s\n, ctype-cipher_type-description);
printf( instance count: %d\n, ctype-cipher_type-ref_count);
printf( self-test: );
status = cipher_type_self_test(ctype-cipher_type);
if (status) {
printf(failed with error code %d\n, status);
exit(status);
}
printf(passed\n);
ctype = ctype-next;
}
Unfortunately, it is not trivial to remove that exit(), so I'm inclined to just
leave it in.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659756] Review Request: libnfsidmap - Library that handles mapping between names and ids for NFSv4.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659756 Steve Whitehouse swhit...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659756] Review Request: libnfsidmap - Library that handles mapping between names and ids for NFSv4.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659756 Steve Whitehouse swhit...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||swhit...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|swhit...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577514] Review Request: luarocks - Package management system for Lua modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577514 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-03 11:04:21 EST --- I'm trying to locate someone who understands lua sufficiently to look at this package. I'm pretty sure that some of the issues make this package unacceptable as is (conflicting with existing packages and the x86_64 thing needing a symlink) but I have essentially no understanding of lua issues so I can't say for sure. If I do manage to find someone who wants to is willing to review this, are you still interested in submitting it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656010] Review Request: libsrtp - An implementation of the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656010 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-03 11:06:55 EST --- With CVS all you have is a date, or a tag if upstream has made one. There is no concept analogous to SVN's revision number or git's commit hash. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659756] Review Request: libnfsidmap - Library that handles mapping between names and ids for NFSv4.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659756 Steve Whitehouse swhit...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Group||rhel_beta --- Comment #1 from Steve Whitehouse swhit...@redhat.com 2010-12-03 11:03:47 EST --- rpmlint says: [st...@dolmen ~]$ rpmlint ./libnfsidmap-0.23-1.fc14.src.rpm libnfsidmap.src:10: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 10) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645764] Review Request: django-addons - to add plugging functionality in your projects easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645764 --- Comment #21 from Domingo Becker domingobec...@gmail.com 2010-12-03 11:21:05 EST --- Python for el5 complains about the requires y setup.py code. It was removed by a patch. Spec URL: http://beckerde.fedorapeople.org/transifex/django-addons.spec SRPM URL: http://beckerde.fedorapeople.org/transifex/django-addons-0.6.4-4.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 645764] Review Request: django-addons - to add plugging functionality in your projects easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645764 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-03 11:24:51 EST --- django-addons-0.6.4-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-addons-0.6.4-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 498397] Review Request: perl-Devel-REPL - Modern perl interactive shell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498397 --- Comment #6 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2010-12-03 11:39:31 EST --- To start: DEBUG util.py:267: No Package Found for perl(MooseX::AttributeHelpers) = 0.16 DEBUG util.py:267: No Package Found for perl(App::Nopaste) DEBUG util.py:267: No Package Found for perl(MooseX::Object::Pluggable) = 0.0009 DEBUG util.py:267: No Package Found for perl(Lexical::Persistence) Yeah, I'm not up for that. I'm just going to disable REPL in PDL for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659756] Review Request: libnfsidmap - Library that handles mapping between names and ids for NFSv4.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659756 --- Comment #3 from Steve Whitehouse swhit...@redhat.com 2010-12-03 11:44:09 EST --- SHOULD items: COPYING file from source package should be installed under %doc Summary and description should contain translations if possible (I'm guessing that it isn't in this case, and its not really a big issue) Package builds correctly I've tested it on x86_64, I don't have any other arches to test on. Package is a library and there is no easy way to test its function without a package that depends upon it. Scriptlets are not used (so no sanity check required) Subpackages/-devel are covered under MUST and are ok No file deps, so ok on that score Includes man pages from upstream So thats all the should items. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659756] Review Request: libnfsidmap - Library that handles mapping between names and ids for NFSv4.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659756 --- Comment #4 from Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com 2010-12-03 12:06:56 EST --- The updated spec and srpm: http://steved.fedorapeople.org/libnfsidmap/libnfsidmap.spec http://steved.fedorapeople.org/libnfsidmap/libnfsidmap-0.23-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655601] Review Request: jing-trang - Schema validation and conversion based on RELAX NG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655601 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi 2010-12-03 12:06:30 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jing-trang Short Description: Schema validation and conversion based on RELAX NG Owners: scop Branches: f14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659756] Review Request: libnfsidmap - Library that handles mapping between names and ids for NFSv4.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659756
--- Comment #5 from Steve Whitehouse swhit...@redhat.com 2010-12-03 12:15:16
EST ---
Updated checks on comment #4 version:
Should use one of ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} or %{buildroot}: ok
Local files: ok (not required)
Parallel make: ok (now added)
Doc files: Still doesn't appear to be including the COPYING file for some
reason
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659756] Review Request: libnfsidmap - Library that handles mapping between names and ids for NFSv4.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659756 --- Comment #6 from Steve Whitehouse swhit...@redhat.com 2010-12-03 12:21:10 EST --- Latest uploaded version now has docs correct too, so I think this is ready now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659756] Review Request: libnfsidmap - Library that handles mapping between names and ids for NFSv4.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659756 Steve Whitehouse swhit...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659756] Review Request: libnfsidmap - Library that handles mapping between names and ids for NFSv4.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659756 Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?, fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659756] Review Request: libnfsidmap - Library that handles mapping between names and ids for NFSv4.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659756 Steve Whitehouse swhit...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659368] Review Request: luabind - A library that helps create bindings between C++ and Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659368 --- Comment #3 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2010-12-03 12:46:24 EST --- Whoops. I pushed a new boost update to fix that, and confirmed that it builds luabind. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/boost-1.41.0-11.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/boost-1.44.0-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 574586] Review Request: python26-psycopg2 : psycopg2 Postgres client code for python26 on EPEL5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574586 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ti...@math.uh.edu Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-03 13:33:41 EST --- I don't really do anything relating to EPEL, but this has been sitting around for so long and my attempts to get someone to look at it have failed, so I'll take care of it as best I can. Builds fine in a CentOS5 mock buildroot (no RHEL5 for me; hopefully it doesn't matter). rpmlint says: python26-psycopg2.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/psycopg2/_psycopg.so _psycopg.so()(64bit) which were this Fedora I'd say needs to be filtered. However, the filtering infrastructure doesn't appear to be present in RHEL5 The %pyver macro seems to be defined, but not used. In Fedora, uses of %define should generally be changed to %global. (I checked a couple of other python26 reviews and some use %global while yours seem to use %define. I'm not sure if there's a reason for that.) You're right, the license tag on the python-psycopg2 package is definitely wrong. In F13 it's GPLv2+ with exceptions which doesn't appear to be correct, and in rawhide it's just LGPLv3 which is also incorrect. I just went ahead and fixed it. I am assuming that you are sticking with 2.0.14 instead of updating to the latest version for reasons relating to the age of RHEL5. If you wish to package the current instead, just push another package and I'll take a look. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 902607cdbe1195a00694d2b477eed8429eda433caaa0eb6ff7f80883e1c17ac7 psycopg2-2.0.14.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * package builds in mock (x86_64, EL5). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints (for EL5, at least). * final provides and requires are sane: python26-psycopg2-2.0.14-2.el5.x86_64.rpm _psycopg.so()(64bit) python26-psycopg2 = 2.0.14-2.el5 = libpq.so.4()(64bit) libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit) python26-psycopg2-doc-2.0.14-2.el5.x86_64.rpm python26-psycopg2-doc = 2.0.14-2.el5 = python26-psycopg2 = 2.0.14-2.el5 * no bundled libraries. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 571993] Review Request: non-sequencer - A powerful, real-time, pattern-based MIDI sequencer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571993 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||StalledSubmitter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659812] New: Review Request: libindicator - Shared functions for Ayatana indicators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libindicator - Shared functions for Ayatana indicators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659812 Summary: Review Request: libindicator - Shared functions for Ayatana indicators Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: awill...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/libindicator.spec SRPM URL: http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/libindicator-0.3.15-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: A set of symbols and convenience functions that all Ayatana indicators are likely to use. This is part of packaging Unity for Fedora. The only odd thing about the build is that we build the lib twice, to have a GTK+ 2 and a GTK+ 3 build, so GTK+2 and GTK+3 apps can both use the indicator framework. This is explicitly intended and supported by upstream. The patches, as noted, come from upstream and fix a couple of things for this building-both-libraries process. rpmlint output: [ad...@adam result]$ rpmlint *.rpm libindicator.src:86: W: configure-without-libdir-spec libindicator.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean libindicator.src: W: no-buildroot-tag libindicator.src: W: no-%clean-section libindicator-devel.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/X11/Xsession.d/80indicator-debugging 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. the configure-without-libdir is a false positive that comes when re-defining _configure for out-of-tree building (necessary to do the two builds). The actual configure statements are correct. non-conffile-in-etc is okay, the file isn't really intended to be modified (it just sets some values to aid in developer debugging, which is why it's packaged in the -devel package; this is how Ubuntu packages it too). The others are okay for F13+ (F12 is EOL). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646614] Rename review: drupal-calendar - drupal6-calendar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646614 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2010-12-03 14:14:28 EST --- SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-calendar/drupal6-calendar-6.x.2.2-3.fc13.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-calendar/drupal6-calendar.spec Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646612] Rename review: drupal-date - drupal6-date
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646612 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2010-12-03 14:20:55 EST --- SRPMS: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-date/drupal6-date-6.x.2.4-2.fc14.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-date/drupal6-date.spec Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646614] Rename review: drupal-calendar - drupal6-calendar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646614 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2010-12-03 14:21:58 EST --- SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-calendar/drupal6-calendar-6.x.2.2-3.fc14.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-calendar/drupal6-calendar.spec URL Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646611] Rename review: drupal-cck - drupal6-cck
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646611 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2010-12-03 14:25:32 EST --- SRPMS: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-cck/drupal6-cck-6.x.2.8-2.fc14.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-cck/drupal6-cck.spec Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646610] Rename review: drupal-views - drupal6-views
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646610 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2010-12-03 14:29:31 EST --- SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-views/drupal6-views-6.x.2.11-2.fc14.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-views/drupal6-views.spec Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646608] Rename review: drupal-service_links - drupal6-service_links
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646608 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2010-12-03 14:32:24 EST --- SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-service_links/drupal6-service_links-6.x.2.0-2.fc14.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-service_links/drupal6-service_links.spec Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619355] Review Request: python26-numpy - A fast multidimensional array facility for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619355 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||BuildFails Bug 619355 depends on bug 574531, which changed state. Bug 574531 Summary: Review Request: python26-nose - The nose testing package for the python26 EPEL5 package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574531 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-03 14:45:24 EST --- This seems to fail to build for me in a Centos5 buildroot in mock. Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but my understanding is that your pyver macro will break srpm parsing because it is empty before python is installed: Executing command: ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bs --target x86_64 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/python26-numpy.spec'] sh: /usr/bin/python2.6: No such file or directory sh: /usr/bin/python2.6: No such file or directory error: line 26: Version required: Requires: python(abi) = Perhaps it would be better to simply require 2.6 (since it already kind of hardcoded into the name of the package) and dispense with the pyver macro altogether? A scratch build is at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2642342 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646606] Rename review: drupal-workspace - drupal6-workspace
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646606 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2010-12-03 14:53:06 EST --- SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-workspace/drupal6-workspace-6.x.1.4-3.rc1.fc14.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6-workspace/drupal6-workspace.spec Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619355] Review Request: python26-numpy - A fast multidimensional array facility for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619355 --- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2010-12-03 15:11:54 EST --- I've seen the message sh: /usr/bin/python2.6: No such file or directory but in the past it has not been fatal. I agree given hard coding of the package name hardcoding the python package name makes sense. Will post new ones soon. Steve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603346] Review Request: php-voms-admin - Web based interface to control VOMS parameters written in PHP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603346 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-03 15:16:58 EST --- The spec URL above is invalid. Version 0.5 seems to have been released; is there any reason to continue to package a checkout? Also, you have the dist tag in the wrong place in the Release:; it goes at the end (except in one limited case which does not apply here). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659756] Review Request: libnfsidmap - Library that handles mapping between names and ids for NFSv4.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659756 --- Comment #7 from Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com 2010-12-03 15:34:10 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libnfsidmap Short Description: Library that handles mapping between names and ids for NFSv4 Owners: steved Branches: rawhide InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655601] Review Request: jing-trang - Schema validation and conversion based on RELAX NG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655601 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-03 15:40:08 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644899] Review Request: python-pywt - Python wavelet transforms module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644899 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-03 15:39:49 EST --- python-pywt-0.2.0-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644899] Review Request: python-pywt - Python wavelet transforms module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644899 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-pywt-0.2.0-3.fc14|python-pywt-0.2.0-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644899] Review Request: python-pywt - Python wavelet transforms module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644899 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-03 15:40:45 EST --- python-pywt-0.2.0-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 649939] Review Request: loook - search tool for OpenOffice.org documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649939 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-03 15:41:13 EST --- loook-0.6.7-5.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655883] Review Request: latexila - Integrated LaTeX Environment for the GNOME desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655883 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-03 15:40:18 EST --- latexila-2.0.1-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update latexila'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/latexila-2.0.1-4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659756] Review Request: libnfsidmap - Library that handles mapping between names and ids for NFSv4.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659756 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-12-03 15:42:09 EST --- rawhide is not a valid branch name; I've ignored it. Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656855] Review Request: omping - Utility to test IP multicast functionality
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656855 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-03 15:42:14 EST --- omping-0.0.1-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 649939] Review Request: loook - search tool for OpenOffice.org documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649939 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||loook-0.6.7-5.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-12-03 15:41:18 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644899] Review Request: python-pywt - Python wavelet transforms module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644899 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-pywt-0.2.0-3.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-12-03 15:39:55 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561477] Review Request: jnr-posix - Java Posix layer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561477 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-03 15:42:04 EST --- jnr-posix-1.1.4-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jnr-posix'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jnr-posix-1.1.4-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646637] Review Request: jnr-netdb - Network services database access for java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646637 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-03 15:39:41 EST --- jnr-netdb-1.0.1-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jnr-netdb'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jnr-netdb-1.0.1-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656855] Review Request: omping - Utility to test IP multicast functionality
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656855 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||omping-0.0.1-2.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-12-03 15:42:19 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654909] Review Request: django-tables - A Django Queryset renderer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654909 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-03 15:45:23 EST --- django-tables-0.3-0.1.20101124git02ecf61.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654909] Review Request: django-tables - A Django Queryset renderer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654909 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|django-tables-0.3-0.1.20101 |django-tables-0.3-0.1.20101 |124git02ecf61.fc13 |124git02ecf61.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654909] Review Request: django-tables - A Django Queryset renderer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654909 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||django-tables-0.3-0.1.20101 ||124git02ecf61.fc13 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-12-03 15:43:20 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638909] Review Request: erlang-gproc - Extended process registry for Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638909 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-03 15:45:12 EST --- erlang-gproc-0-0.3.20100929gitf0807c9.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update erlang-gproc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-gproc-0-0.3.20100929gitf0807c9.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 509798] Review Request: armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi-binutils - A GNU collection of binary utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509798
Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richmat...@gmail.com
--- Comment #13 from Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com 2010-12-03 15:43:38 EST
---
The specfile in the SRPM has the --enable-targets=%{_host} line commented out,
which is causing the build to fail. I don't know if it's supposed to be
enabled or not, but the package builds without the # and without the entire
line.
There's some recent interest on the ARM mailing list for getting a
cross-compiler working[1]. Included are patches for the latest rawhide
binutils and gcc, I don't know if they're helpful for you.
I think it would be worth starting a discussion over on the ARM list about
naming conventions for cross tools. Personally, I think the cross tools should
follow the conventions that the native tools use (it looks like they're all
using %{_target_platform}, which evaluates to i686-redhat-linux-gnu on fedora
13)
[1]http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/arm/2010-November/000727.html
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652400] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build - Creates appliances for various virtual environments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652400 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-03 15:43:03 EST --- rubygem-boxgrinder-build-0.6.4-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-boxgrinder-build'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-boxgrinder-build-0.6.4-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 654909] Review Request: django-tables - A Django Queryset renderer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654909 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-03 15:43:15 EST --- django-tables-0.3-0.1.20101124git02ecf61.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646663] Rename review: drupal - drupal6, F15+
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646663 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2010-12-03 16:09:21 EST --- Fixed. SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6/drupal6.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal6/drupal6-6.19-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659856] New: Review Request:eclipse-vrapper - Vim-like editing in Eclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:eclipse-vrapper - Vim-like editing in Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659856 Summary: Review Request:eclipse-vrapper - Vim-like editing in Eclipse Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jkeat...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/review/eclipse-vrapper/eclipse-vrapper.spec SRPM URL: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/review/eclipse-vrapper/eclipse-vrapper-0.15.0-0.1.svn351.fc14.src.rpm Description: Vrapper is an eclipse plugin which acts as a wrapper for eclipse text editors to provide a Vim-like input scheme for moving around and editing text. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655601] Review Request: jing-trang - Schema validation and conversion based on RELAX NG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655601 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-03 17:20:17 EST --- jing-trang-2009-7.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jing-trang-2009-7.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655601] Review Request: jing-trang - Schema validation and conversion based on RELAX NG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655601 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659895] Review Request: makedepf90 - Create Makefile dependency list for Fortran source files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659895 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski r...@greysector.net changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||659896 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659896] Review Request: cp2k - Molecular simulations software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659896 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski r...@greysector.net changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||659895 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659895] New: Review Request: makedepf90 - Create Makefile dependency list for Fortran source files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: makedepf90 - Create Makefile dependency list for Fortran source files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659895 Summary: Review Request: makedepf90 - Create Makefile dependency list for Fortran source files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: r...@greysector.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/makedepf90.spec SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/makedepf90-2.8.8-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Makedepf90 is a program for automatic creation of Makefile dependency lists for Fortran source code. Makedepf90 supports MODULE:s, INCLUDE:s, cpp #include:s, f90ppr $include:s and coco ??include:s and set-files. The original idea was to provide the same functionality for Fortran as gcc -MM *.c does for C. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659896] New: Review Request: cp2k - Molecular simulations software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cp2k - Molecular simulations software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659896 Summary: Review Request: cp2k - Molecular simulations software Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: r...@greysector.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/cp2k.spec SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/cp2k-2.1-1.20101006.fc12.src.rpm Description: CP2K is a freely available (GPL) program, written in Fortran 95, to perform atomistic and molecular simulations of solid state, liquid, molecular and biological systems. It provides a general framework for different methods such as e.g. density functional theory (DFT) using a mixed Gaussian and plane waves approach (GPW), and classical pair and many-body potentials. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659896] Review Request: cp2k - Molecular simulations software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659896 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski r...@greysector.net changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||cp2k -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
