[Bug 591418] Review Request: R-timeSeries - Rmetrics - financial time series objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591418 --- Comment #7 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr 2011-01-07 03:28:07 EST --- Hi Sandro, happy new year ! Do we have any news on this issue ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 600517] Review Request: R-coda - coda: Output analysis and diagnostics for MCMC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600517 --- Comment #12 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr 2011-01-07 03:29:29 EST --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666517] scim-typing-booster - Indic Typing Booster Table IMEngine for SCIM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666517 --- Comment #5 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 03:46:17 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: scim-typing-booster Short Description: Indic Typing Booster Table IMEngine for SCIM Owners: pravins Branches: f14, devel InitialCC: i18n-team Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666520] ibus-typing-booster - Indic Typing Booster Table IMEngine for ibus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666520 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 03:46:23 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ibus-typing-booster Short Description: Indic Typing Booster Table IMEngine for IBUS Owners: pravins Branches: devel InitialCC: i18n-team Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666517] scim-typing-booster - Indic Typing Booster Table IMEngine for SCIM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666517 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 03:44:38 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: scim-typing-booster Short Description: Indic Typing Booster Table IMEngine for SCIM Owners: pravins Branches: f14, devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 573910] Review Request: dcmtk - Offis DICOM Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573910 --- Comment #19 from Per Inge Mathisen per.mathi...@gmail.com 2011-01-07 03:48:53 EST --- Version 3.6.0 is now released: http://dcmtk.org/dcmtk.php.en -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657403] Review Request: spice-gtk - A GTK widget for SPICE clients
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657403 --- Comment #10 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 04:03:20 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) (In reply to comment #8) as soon as 0.4 is released. If you can give me your fas account name, then I'll add you to the packagers group and sponsor you. After that you can move forward with the SCM request: My FAS account is elmarco. As already mentioned on irc I've added you to the packagers group and sponsored you. I notice that your bugzilla account points to your @gmail.com address. You need to change it to your @redhat.com address, as that is what is in FAS. Or if you have 2 bugzilla accounts use the @redhat.com one to do the SCM request as that one will have the necessary rights. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663914] Review Request: rubygem-fssm - File system state monitor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663914
Michal Fojtik mfoj...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Michal Fojtik mfoj...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 04:34:45 EST
---
Package approved by mfojtik =
Some notes, please fix that before you import this package to Fedora packages:
* Requires: rubygem(rspec) = 0
I'm not sure, if =0 is required here. You can use just rubygem(rspec)
* %{geminstdir}/fssm.gemspec
Please replace 'fssm' with macro you defined at the top %gemname
Format review:
[OK] Packages that contain Ruby Gems must be called rubygem-%{gemname} where
gemname is the name from the Gem's specification.
[OK] The Source of the package must be the full URL to the released Gem
archive; the version of the package must be the Gem's version
[OK] The package must have a Requires and a BuildRequires on rubygems
[OK] The package must provide rubygem(%{gemname}) where gemname is the name
from the Gem's specification.
[OK] For every dependency on a Gem named gemdep, the package must contain a
Requires on rubygem(%{gemdep}) with the same version constraints as the Gem
[OK] The %prep and %build sections of the specfile should be empty.
[OK] The Gem must be installed into %{gemdir} defined as
%global gemdir %(ruby -rubygems -e 'puts Gem::dir' 2/dev/null)
[OK] The package must own the following files and directories:
%{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/
%{gemdir}/cache/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem
%{gemdir}/specifications/%{gemname}-%{version}.gemspec
[OK] If the Gem only contains pure Ruby code, it must be marked as BuildArch:
noarch.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638647] Review Request: mom - Dynamically manage system resources on virtualization hosts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638647
--- Comment #21 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com 2011-01-07 04:59:01
EST ---
Richard, you must be the reviewer if you want to be the sponsor:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Get_Sponsored
| Review and approval for the first package for new packagers
| must be done by registered sponsors. Subsequent reviews can be done
| by any package maintainer. Informal reviews can always be done by
| anyone interested.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_sponsor_a_new_contributor
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
[...]
%files
...
%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/*
Notice that directory %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} is not included:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories
Better replace the line with just:
%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/
which includes the directory and its contents. The trailing slash is just for
readability (to make more clear that the entry is for a directory).
Also be aware that explicitly including files in
%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} conflicts with using %doc to include
documentation files. As it's a common pitfall for packagers, I recommend you
add a comment to the %files section that %doc MUST NOT be used to include
further documentation files as long as %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} is
used. With recent distribution releases there will be an error. With older
ones, you would kill files without any error/warning.
Requires: libvirt, libvirt-python
Even if it may be obvious to insiders, please add a comment here that explains
why these two Explicit Requires are necessary:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666517] scim-typing-booster - Indic Typing Booster Table IMEngine for SCIM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666517 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #69 from Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 06:05:50 EST --- okay, I guess I'll resign myself to maintaining a variant libva for psb use, and just switch this review over to the upstream version. package coming. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666529] Review Request: python-orange - Python AI component based package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666529 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-07 06:19:13 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) If you try to install this package rpm/yum will complain that liborange.so is required but no package provides it. This is an error since the mentioned library is in the package itself?! I don't know yet to fix it or what causes it so use force option to rpm to install the package. Does the package work as expected once installed? Maybe everything is fine, when you fixed rpmlint: * private-shared-object-provides see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering#Arch-specific_extensions_to_scripting_languages * binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath * wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding (When you fix the first warning, it should be installable again.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667954] New: Review Request: rubygem-arel - Arel is a Relational Algebra for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-arel - Arel is a Relational Algebra for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667954 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-arel - Arel is a Relational Algebra for Ruby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vondr...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-arel.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-arel-2.0.6-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Arel is a Relational Algebra for Ruby. It 1) simplifies the generation complex of SQL queries and it 2) adapts to various RDBMS systems. It is intended to be a framework framework; that is, you can build your own ORM with it, focusing on innovative object and collection modeling as opposed to database compatibility and query generation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667879] Review Request: perl-Getopt-Usaginator - Conjure up a usage function for your applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667879 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mmasl...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667879] Review Request: perl-Getopt-Usaginator - Conjure up a usage function for your applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667879
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 07:49:12
EST ---
- rpmlint OK
W: spelling-error %description -l en_US commandline - command line,
command-line, commanding
- package must be named according to Guidelines OK
- spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK
- package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK
- package must be licensed with Fedora approved license OK
- license field must match actual license OK
- text of the license in its own file must be included in %doc OK
- sources must match the upstream source OK
- package MUST successfully compile and build OK
- architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla OK
- build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK
- handle locales properly with %find_lang macro OK
- shared library files must call ldconfig in %post(un) OK
- packages must NOT bundle system libraries OK
- package must own all directories that it creates OK
- permissions on files must be set properly OK
- package must consistently use macros OK
- package must contain code, or permissable content OK
- large documentation must go in a -doc OK
- %doc must not affect the runtime of the application OK
- header files must be in a -devel package OK
- static libraries must be in a -static package OK
- library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel OK
- devel package usually require base package OK
- packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives OK
- GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK
- packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK
rpm -qp --provides ~/Downloads/perl-Getopt-Usaginator-0.0012-1.fc15.noarch.rpm
perl(Getopt::Usaginator) = 0.0012
perl-Getopt-Usaginator = 0.0012-1.fc15
rpm -qp --requires ~/Downloads/perl-Getopt-Usaginator-0.0012-1.fc15.noarch.rpm
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.2)
rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1
perl(Package::Pkg)
perl(strict)
perl(warnings)
rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1
ACCEPT
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663914] Review Request: rubygem-fssm - File system state monitor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663914 Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 08:01:49 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-fssm Short Description: File system state monitor Owners: vondruch Branches: f14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665190] Review Request: perl-List-UtilsBy - Higher-order list utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665190 --- Comment #3 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 08:07:11 EST --- I found there's missing one provides. Add: Provides: perl(List::UtilsBy) You can't build dependent package without it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665189] Review Request: perl-Convert-Color - Color space conversions and named lookups
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665189
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mmasl...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 08:09:46
EST ---
- rpmlint OK
W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) lookups - lockups, hookups, look ups
- package must be named according to Guidelines OK
- spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK
- package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK
- package must be licensed with Fedora approved license OK
- license field must match actual license OK
- text of the license in its own file must be included in %doc OK
- sources must match the upstream source OK
- package MUST successfully compile and build ?
- architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla OK
- build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK
- handle locales properly with %find_lang macro OK
- shared library files must call ldconfig in %post(un) OK
- packages must NOT bundle system libraries OK
- package must own all directories that it creates OK
- permissions on files must be set properly OK
- package must consistently use macros OK
- package must contain code, or permissable content OK
- large documentation must go in a -doc OK
- %doc must not affect the runtime of the application OK
- header files must be in a -devel package OK
- static libraries must be in a -static package OK
- library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel OK
- devel package usually require base package OK
- packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives OK
- GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK
- packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK
rpm -qp --provides perl-Convert-Color-0.07-1.fc14.noarch.rpm
perl-Convert-Color = 0.07-1.fc14
rpm -qp --requires perl-Convert-Color-0.07-1.fc14.noarch.rpm
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.2)
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
I suggest adding into provides perl(Convert::Color).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657403] Review Request: spice-gtk - A GTK widget for SPICE clients
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657403 Marc-Andre Lureau marcandre.lur...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Marc-Andre Lureau marcandre.lur...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 09:07:15 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: spice-gtk Short Description: glib/gtk client libraries for SPICE Owners: elmarco Branches: f14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666529] Review Request: python-orange - Python AI component based package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666529 --- Comment #3 from Stjepan Gros stjepan.g...@gmail.com 2011-01-07 09:21:01 EST --- Ok, I fixed that and other rpmlint warnings except rpath one. Since so binary is in a non standard path (inside python site specific dir), as I understand packaging guidelines, rpath can stay as is? Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/python-orange/python-orange.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/python-orange/python-orange-2.0b-0.20101215.2.fc14.src.rpm And yes, library works for me (TM), since I have one program that uses orange and when I tried it it worked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664976] Review Request: perl-Class-Accessor-Lite - Minimalistic variant of Class::Accessor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664976
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mmasl...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 09:30:29
EST ---
- rpmlint OK
W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Minimalistic - Minimalist, Minimalism,
Minimality
- package must be named according to Guidelines OK
- spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK
- package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK
- package must be licensed with Fedora approved license OK
- license field must match actual license OK
- text of the license in its own file must be included in %doc OK
- sources must match the upstream source OK
- package MUST successfully compile and build OK
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2707027
- architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla OK
- build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK
- handle locales properly with %find_lang macro OK
- shared library files must call ldconfig in %post(un) OK
- packages must NOT bundle system libraries OK
- package must own all directories that it creates OK
- permissions on files must be set properly OK
- package must consistently use macros OK
- package must contain code, or permissable content OK
- large documentation must go in a -doc OK
- %doc must not affect the runtime of the application OK
- header files must be in a -devel package OK
- static libraries must be in a -static package OK
- library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel OK
- devel package usually require base package OK
- packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives OK
- GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK
- packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK
rpm -qp --provides perl-Class-Accessor-Lite-0.05-1.fc14.noarch.rpm
perl-Class-Accessor-Lite = 0.05-1.fc14
rpm -qp --requires perl-Class-Accessor-Lite-0.05-1.fc14.noarch.rpm
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.2)
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
There's again missing provides perl(Class::Accessor::Lite). I have experimental
rpm-4.8.90, so it could be fault of RPM. What do you think?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663384] Review Request: scap-workbench - GUI tool that provides scanning, tailoring, editing and validation functionality for SCAP content
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663384 Radek Vokal rvo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rvo...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Radek Vokal rvo...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 09:50:04 EST --- The debuging to console should be probably turned-off. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667954] Review Request: rubygem-arel - Arel is a Relational Algebra for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667954 --- Comment #1 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 09:56:16 EST --- Buildroot cleanup added: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-arel.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-arel-2.0.6-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664949] Review Request: perl-Proc-Wait3 - Perl extension for wait3 system call
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664949
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mmasl...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 10:00:27
EST ---
- rpmlint OK
W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib64/perl5/auto/Proc/Wait3/Wait3.so
Wait3.so()(64bit)
- package must be named according to Guidelines OK
- spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK
- package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK
- package must be licensed with Fedora approved license OK
- license field must match actual license OK
- text of the license in its own file must be included in %doc OK
- sources must match the upstream source OK
- package MUST successfully compile and build OK
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2707110
- architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla OK
- build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK
- handle locales properly with %find_lang macro OK
- shared library files must call ldconfig in %post(un) OK
- packages must NOT bundle system libraries OK
- package must own all directories that it creates OK
- permissions on files must be set properly OK
- package must consistently use macros OK
- package must contain code, or permissable content OK
- large documentation must go in a -doc OK
- %doc must not affect the runtime of the application OK
- header files must be in a -devel package OK
- static libraries must be in a -static package OK
- library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel OK
- devel package usually require base package OK
- packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives OK
- GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK
- packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK
rpm -qp --provides
/home/marca/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/perl-Proc-Wait3-0.03-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm
Wait3.so()(64bit)
perl-Proc-Wait3 = 0.03-1.fc14
perl-Proc-Wait3(x86-64) = 0.03-1.fc14
rpm -qp --requires
/home/marca/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/perl-Proc-Wait3-0.03-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.2)
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)
In provides is missing perl(Proc::Wait3). Wait3.so shouldn't be provided, which
could be easily filtered by macro perl_default_filter.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 Julian Aloofi julian.fed...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||julian.fed...@googlemail.co ||m --- Comment #28 from Julian Aloofi julian.fed...@googlemail.com 2011-01-07 10:10:57 EST --- Should probably be closed now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667416] Review Request: util-linux - rename from util-linux-ng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667416 --- Comment #1 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-07 10:30:50 EST --- formal review is here, see the notes explaining OK* and BAD statuses below: OK source files match upstream: 5dcb211602b1639a6cda5055f02245b8f94d0559 util-linux-2.19-rc1.tar.bz2 OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. BAD license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. BAD rpmlint is silent. BAD final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths with proper scriptlets OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK headers in -devel OK pkgconfig files in -devel OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - the uuidd, libmount, libblkid, libuuid subpackages must include their license text as %doc - rpmlint throws a lot of warnings/errors, mostly can be ignored I think, but they deserve a review - the compatibility Provides/Obsoletes should be cleaned up for the update path I suggest to use Obsoletes: util-linux-ng 2.19 (instead of 2.18.1) - you can drop the Buildroot tag and the clean section, they are not needed in recent Fedoras (and next RHEL) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667954] Review Request: rubygem-arel - Arel is a Relational Algebra for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667954 --- Comment #2 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 10:35:55 EST --- All documentation moved into subpackage Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-arel.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-arel-2.0.6-3.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665395] Review Request: firewalld - A firewall daemon with D-BUS interface providing a dynamic firewall
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665395 Thomas Woerner twoer...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-07 10:52:58 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Woerner twoer...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 10:52:58 EST --- Here is the build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=213149 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||WONTFIX Flag|fedora-review+ | Last Closed||2011-01-07 10:50:14 --- Comment #29 from Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-07 10:50:14 EST --- Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667997] New: Review Request: rubygem-rack-mount - Stackable dynamic tree based Rack router
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rack-mount - Stackable dynamic tree based Rack router https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667997 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rack-mount - Stackable dynamic tree based Rack router Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vondr...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-rack-mount.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-rack-mount-0.6.13-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Stackable dynamic tree based Rack router. Supports Rack’s X-Cascade convention to continue trying routes if the response returns pass. This allows multiple routes to be nested or stacked on top of each other. Since the application endpoint can trigger the router to continue matching, middle-ware can be used to add arbitrary conditions to any route. This allows you to route based on other request attributes, session information, or even data dynamically pulled from a database. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 638647] Review Request: mom - Dynamically manage system resources on virtualization hosts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638647 --- Comment #22 from Adam Litke a...@us.ibm.com 2011-01-07 11:06:54 EST --- Michael, thanks for your comments. I have updated the spec file and srpm to incorporate your suggestions. https://github.com/downloads/aglitke/mom/mom.spec https://github.com/downloads/aglitke/mom/mom-0.2.1-5.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668001] New: Review Request: nepomukcontroller - Applet to control the Nepomuk file indexer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nepomukcontroller - Applet to control the Nepomuk file indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668001 Summary: Review Request: nepomukcontroller - Applet to control the Nepomuk file indexer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jrez...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/nepomukcontroller/nepomukcontroller.spec SRPM URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/nepomukcontroller/nepomukcontroller-0.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Nepomukcontroller is a small systray applet that allows you to suspend and resume the Nepomuk file indexer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668001] Review Request: nepomukcontroller - Applet to control the Nepomuk file indexer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668001 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org Blocks||656997(kde-reviews) --- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 11:17:26 EST --- This package is temporary solution as nepomukcontroller is going back to the kdebase-workspace package when 4.7 is released. The question is - do we want standalone package or incorporate it to kdebase-workspace package? Please, comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668008] New: Review Request: rubygem-rack-mount - Stack-able dynamic tree based Rack router
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rack-mount - Stack-able dynamic tree based Rack router https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668008 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rack-mount - Stack-able dynamic tree based Rack router Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: minnikha...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14118661/rubygem-rack-mount.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14118661/rubygem-rack-mount-0.6.13-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Hi. I just finished packaging up rubygem-rack-mount, and I would appreciate a review so that I can get it into Fedora Extras. https://rubygems.org/gems/rack-mount - Stack-able dynamic tree based Rack router . ( 0.6.13 August 31, 2010 ) Packed for rails 3.0.x in F15 in Ruby SIG mailing list http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/2010-December/000376.html koji scratch build successful: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2707300 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668001] Review Request: nepomukcontroller - Applet to control the Nepomuk file indexer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668001 --- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 11:20:24 EST --- rpmlint nepomukcontroller-0.2-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm nepomukcontroller.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US systray - syst ray, syst-ray, systaltic nepomukcontroller.x86_64: W: no-documentation nepomukcontroller.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nepomukcontroller 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. rpmlint nepomukcontroller-0.2-1.fc14.src.rpm nepomukcontroller.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US systray - syst ray, syst-ray, systaltic 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2707207 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #70 from Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 11:31:58 EST --- Here's a spec / src for a build of 1.0.7 from upstream. My plan for now is to have this in Fedora, a package containing only the i965 driver in a third-party repository for people for whom the patent is not a problem, and I will ship a libva-sds in my side repo for Poulsbo users. That should keep everyone happy, I guess. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667997] Review Request: rubygem-rack-mount - Stackable dynamic tree based Rack router
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667997 Minnikhanov minnikha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||minnikha...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Minnikhanov minnikha...@gmail.com 2011-01-07 11:36:29 EST --- *** Bug 668008 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665190] Review Request: perl-List-UtilsBy - Higher-order list utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665190 --- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2011-01-07 11:33:33 EST --- # (In reply to comment #3) I found there's missing one provides. Add: Provides: perl(List::UtilsBy) You can't build dependent package without it. Which target are you building for? # rpm -qlp perl-List-UtilsBy-0.06-1.fc14.noarch.rpm /usr/share/doc/perl-List-UtilsBy-0.06 /usr/share/doc/perl-List-UtilsBy-0.06/Changes /usr/share/doc/perl-List-UtilsBy-0.06/LICENSE /usr/share/doc/perl-List-UtilsBy-0.06/README /usr/share/man/man3/List::UtilsBy.3pm.gz /usr/share/perl5/List /usr/share/perl5/List/UtilsBy.pm # rpm -q --provides -p perl-List-UtilsBy-0.06-1.fc14.noarch.rpm perl(List::UtilsBy) = 0.06 perl-List-UtilsBy = 0.06-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668008] Review Request: rubygem-rack-mount - Stack-able dynamic tree based Rack router
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668008 Minnikhanov minnikha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE Last Closed||2011-01-07 11:36:29 --- Comment #1 from Minnikhanov minnikha...@gmail.com 2011-01-07 11:36:29 EST --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 667997 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #71 from Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 11:35:14 EST --- http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/libva.spec http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/libva-1.0.7-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #27 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com 2011-01-07 11:46:03 EST --- I would like to build this package also for RHEL. Thanks. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: partimage Short Description: Partition imaging utility, much like Ghost Owners: roma Branches: el5 el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665190] Review Request: perl-List-UtilsBy - Higher-order list utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665190 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2011-01-07 11:49:12 EST --- Same for a local f15 built: # rpm -q --provides -p /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/perl-List-UtilsBy-0.06-1.fc15.noarch.rpm perl(List::UtilsBy) = 0.06 perl-List-UtilsBy = 0.06-1.fc15 Could it be you simply didn't specify the arguments in your rpmquery call correctly? Note what you wrote in comment #1: rpm -qp --provides ../RPMS/noarch/perl-List-UtilsBy-0.06-1.fc14.noarch.rpm perl-List-UtilsBy = 0.06-1.fc14 rpm -qp --provides ... -p is a positional argument which takes one argument. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664204] Review Request: perl-BackPAN-Index - Interface to the BackPAN index
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664204 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-07 12:27:31 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657403] Review Request: spice-gtk - A GTK widget for SPICE clients
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657403 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-07 12:26:44 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663914] Review Request: rubygem-fssm - File system state monitor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663914 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-07 12:27:01 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #28 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-07 12:26:24 EST --- This package already exists; you cannot file a new package request for it. Perhaps you wanted to file a change request to add new branches? If you do, please do so but keep in mind that if you are not the maintainer of the Fedora version then you will probably need the approval of the Fedora maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665190] Review Request: perl-List-UtilsBy - Higher-order list utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665190 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-07 12:30:02 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666633] Review Request: lastfmlib - library providing implementation of LastFm Submission Protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=33 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-07 12:32:16 EST --- This ticket is not assigned to anyone. Review tickets should be assigned to the reviewer. Please fix and re-set the fedora-cvs flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664980] Review Request: perl-Test-TCP - Testing TCP program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664980 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-07 12:29:07 EST --- Since this package already exists, you cannot file a new package request for it. If you want additional branches or want us to change something, please either file a change request or tell us what you need changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666656] Review Request: praat - analyze, synthesize, and manipulate speech.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=56 --- Comment #4 from Susmit thinklinux@gmail.com 2011-01-07 12:37:16 EST --- Is there a standard way to find out bundled libraries? I can use some help here. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666633] Review Request: lastfmlib - library providing implementation of LastFm Submission Protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=33 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|joc...@herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #13 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2011-01-07 12:50:36 EST --- Sorry, I have forgotten it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667205] Review Request: radius-engine - A Lua based real-time 2D graphics game engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667205 Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 13:32:22 EST --- Consider the package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 651227] Review Request: python-sleekxmpp - Flexible XMPP client/component/server library for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651227 Silas Sewell si...@sewell.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||si...@sewell.ch --- Comment #12 from Silas Sewell si...@sewell.ch 2011-01-07 13:35:19 EST --- Any update on a Fedora build? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667205] Review Request: radius-engine - A Lua based real-time 2D graphics game engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667205 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 13:49:38 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: radius-engine Short Description: A Lua based real-time 2D graphics game engine Owners: spot Branches: f13 f14 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 523877] Review Request: CBFlib - crystallography binary format library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877 --- Comment #31 from Tim Fenn f...@stanford.edu 2011-01-07 14:03:10 EST --- (In reply to comment #29) drel.py is called at the line 8471 in src/cbf.c (line number from 0.9.1.1rc2 tarball). And drel.py (src/drel.py) python script imports CifFile and StarFile which are provided by PyCifRW. I'm afraid that this means CBFlib requires PyCifRW which has a unique license. I have a private package for PyCifRW and can submit it for package preview. However I don't know how to request the assessment of new licenses. Ah, I hadn't noticed the internal system calls to python - Ugh. OK, this will have to go on hold until the dependence on PyCifRW is removed or we can add it as a dependency. tjyuviaej - let me know if you need assistance submitting/requesting PyCifRW as a package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668052] New: Review Request: libtpms - Library providing Trusted Platform Module (TPM) functionality
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libtpms - Library providing Trusted Platform Module (TPM) functionality https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668052 Summary: Review Request: libtpms - Library providing Trusted Platform Module (TPM) functionality Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stef...@us.ibm.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://kyoder.users.sourceforge.net/libtpms.spec SRPM URL: http://kyoder.users.sourceforge.net/libtpms-0.5.0-1.src.rpm Description: The TPM library provides TPM functionality to VMs. Its current target is its integration into Qemu. For questions, please contact Stefan Berger at stef...@us.ibm.com. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #29 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com 2011-01-07 14:22:01 EST --- Hi, Jason the package is mine in Fedora, and I would like to have it in RHEL. Is this the appropriate way of doing the request? Thanks. Add New Branch Request === Package Name: partimage Short Description: Partition imaging utility, much like Ghost Owners: roma Branches: el5 el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664391] Review Request: libechonest - C++ wrapper for the Echo Nest API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664391 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||libechonest-1.1.0-1.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-01-07 14:57:17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664810] Review Request: perl-Regexp-IPv6 - Regular expression for IPv6 addresses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664810 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-07 14:56:25 EST --- perl-Regexp-IPv6-0.03-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Regexp-IPv6'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Regexp-IPv6-0.03-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664391] Review Request: libechonest - C++ wrapper for the Echo Nest API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664391 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-07 14:57:12 EST --- libechonest-1.1.0-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664391] Review Request: libechonest - C++ wrapper for the Echo Nest API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664391 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-07 15:00:28 EST --- libechonest-1.1.0-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661660] Review Request: metamorphose2 - A cross platform file and folder mass renamer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661660 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-07 14:59:22 EST --- metamorphose2-0.7.1-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664391] Review Request: libechonest - C++ wrapper for the Echo Nest API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664391 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|libechonest-1.1.0-1.fc14|libechonest-1.1.0-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661660] Review Request: metamorphose2 - A cross platform file and folder mass renamer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661660 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||metamorphose2-0.7.1-4.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-01-07 14:59:28 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667781] Add iwl6000g2b-firmware - Firmware for Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 6030 Series Adapters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667781 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-07 15:00:49 EST --- iwl6000g2b-firmware-17.168.5.1-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update iwl6000g2b-firmware'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/iwl6000g2b-firmware-17.168.5.1-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666633] Review Request: lastfmlib - library providing implementation of LastFm Submission Protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=33 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 661354] Review Request: identicurse - Curses based Status.net client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661354 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666656] Review Request: praat - analyze, synthesize, and manipulate speech.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=56 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-07 15:40:47 EST --- You read the source and look at where it comes from. Generally if your source has multiple different authors or licenses, that's a clue. Such things are generally caught in a licensing review, which I'd hope that you'd do a bit of before even submitting the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668090] New: Review Request: rubygem-railties - Rails internals: application bootup, plugins, generators, and rake tasks.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-railties - Rails internals: application bootup, plugins, generators, and rake tasks. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668090 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-railties - Rails internals: application bootup, plugins, generators, and rake tasks. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: minnikha...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14118661/rubygem-railties.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14118661/rubygem-railties-3.0.3-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Railties is responsible to glue all frameworks together. Overall, it: * handles all the bootstrapping process for a Rails application; * manager rails command line interface; * provides Rails generators core; Hi. I just finished packaging up rubygem-railties, and I would appreciate a review so that I can get it into Fedora Extras. https://rubygems.org/gems/railties (ver. 3.0.3 November 16, 2010) Packed for rails 3.0.x in F15 in Ruby SIG mailing list http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/2010-December/000376.html koji scratch build successful: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2707996 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668091] New: Review Request: ami-creator - Simple tool to create an image suitable for use as an EC2 AMI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ami-creator - Simple tool to create an image suitable for use as an EC2 AMI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668091 Summary: Review Request: ami-creator - Simple tool to create an image suitable for use as an EC2 AMI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ka...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://katzj.fedorapeople.org/review/ami-creator/ami-creator.spec SRPM URL: http://katzj.fedorapeople.org/review/ami-creator/ami-creator-0.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: ami-creator is a simple tool that takes a kickstart config and generates an image that is suitable for use in Amazon EC2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668098] New: Review Request: rubygem-tzinfo - Ruby library that uses the standard tz (Olson) database to provide daylight savings aware transformations between times in different time zones.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-tzinfo - Ruby library that uses the standard tz (Olson) database to provide daylight savings aware transformations between times in different time zones. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668098 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-tzinfo - Ruby library that uses the standard tz (Olson) database to provide daylight savings aware transformations between times in different time zones. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: minnikha...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14118661/rubygem-tzinfo.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14118661/rubygem-tzinfo-0.3.23-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: TZInfo uses the tz database (www.twinsun.com/tz/tz-link.htm) to provide daylight-savings aware transformations between times in different timezones. This is the same database as used for zoneinfo on Unix machines. The tz database has been imported (using TZDataParser) and turned into a set of Ruby modules (which are packaged with this release). Hi. I just finished packaging up rubygem-tzinfo, and I would appreciate a review so that I can get it into Fedora Extras. https://rubygems.org/gems/tzinfo (ver. 0.3.23 August 18, 2010 ) Packed for rails 3.0.x in F15 in Ruby SIG mailing list http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/2010-December/000376.html koji scratch build successful: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2708055 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #30 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-07 17:53:53 EST --- Please simply read and follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests as always and submit a package change request. Please do not deviate from the formats given there. Our scripts do not recognize Add New Branch Request or anything else someone may randomly devise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 592487] Review Request: ffgtk - A solution for controlling Fritz!Box or compatible routers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592487 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ti...@math.uh.edu Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-07 19:33:52 EST --- I don't see that clarification from the author included in the package. As I wrote before in comment 6, you need to include the email from the author with headers in the package as documentation, or you can package the updated version that has the fixed manpage. Of course, the author of the code should still follow the directions in the GPL itself and include proper license blocks in the code. AUTHORS, COPYING, ChangeLog, README and README.Fedora seem to be duplicated between each package. You should not duplicate files in that manner. All of the packages require ffgtk, so placing that information in the ffgtk package should be sufficient. I'm unsure about the scriptlets. The dependencies for them seem to be missing, for one, but even then, I don't understand the point of setting up a printer if cups happens to be running at the moment the package is installed (or upgraded). That seems rather nondeterministic. Wouldn't it be best to leave management of the printer to the end user? This package, like many, bundles one of the md5.c implementations. I've requested that FPC give this a blanket exemption as a copylib. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 185605137e1c591c6585cbe6a810689365ff5033652064a5d678def52f7485d3 ffgtk-0.7.8.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. X license clarification not include in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. X final provides and requires; capifax subpackage is missing scripelet dependencies. ffgtk-0.7.8-2.fc15.x86_64.rpm lib_ab_fritzfon.so.0()(64bit) lib_ab_local.so.0()(64bit) lib_ab_thunderbird.so.0()(64bit) lib_ab_vcard.so.0()(64bit) lib_audio_ao.so.0()(64bit) lib_pwd_gnome.so.0()(64bit) ffgtk = 0.7.8-2.fc15 ffgtk(x86-64) = 0.7.8-2.fc15 = lib_ab_fritzfon.so.0()(64bit) lib_ab_local.so.0()(64bit) lib_ab_thunderbird.so.0()(64bit) lib_ab_vcard.so.0()(64bit) lib_audio_ao.so.0()(64bit) lib_pwd_gnome.so.0()(64bit) libao.so.4()(64bit) libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libcurl.so.4()(64bit) libdbus-1.so.3()(64bit) libdbus-glib-1.so.2()(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgnome-keyring.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgstapp-0.10.so.0()(64bit) libgstbase-0.10.so.0()(64bit) libgstinterfaces-0.10.so.0()(64bit) libgstreamer-0.10.so.0()(64bit) libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpng12.so.0()(64bit) libsndfile.so.1()(64bit) libsndfile.so.1(libsndfile.so.1.0)(64bit) libspeex.so.1()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.4.30)(64bit) ffgtk-plugin-capifax-0.7.8-2.fc15.x86_64.rpm lib_fax_capifax.so.0()(64bit) ffgtk-plugin-capifax = 0.7.8-2.fc15 ffgtk-plugin-capifax(x86-64) = 0.7.8-2.fc15 = /bin/sh cups ffgtk = 0.7.8-2.fc15 ghostscript lib_fax_capifax.so.0()(64bit) libcapifax.so.0()(64bit) libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) ffgtk-plugin-evolution-0.7.8-2.fc15.x86_64.rpm lib_ab_ebook.so.0()(64bit) ffgtk-plugin-evolution = 0.7.8-2.fc15 ffgtk-plugin-evolution(x86-64) = 0.7.8-2.fc15 = ffgtk = 0.7.8-2.fc15 lib_ab_ebook.so.0()(64bit) libcamel-1.2.so.21()(64bit) libebook-1.2.so.10()(64bit) libedataserver-1.2.so.14()(64bit) libgconf-2.so.4()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libnspr4.so()(64bit) libnss3.so()(64bit)
[Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #31 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com 2011-01-07 20:23:21 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: partimage New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: roma -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619228] Review Request: shellinaboxd - AJAX based terminal emulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619228 --- Comment #3 from Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com 2011-01-07 20:34:57 EST --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637212] Review Request: yubikey-ksm - The YubiKey Key Storage Module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637212 Ricky Zhou rz...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rz...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Ricky Zhou rz...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 20:46:31 EST --- X - rpmlint clean (normal google code warning) yubikey-ksm-1.5-3.fc14.noarch.rpm: yubikey-ksm.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://yubikey-ksm.googlecode.com/files/yubikey-ksm-1.5.tgz HTTP Error 404: Not Found yubikey-ksm-1.5-3.fc14.noarch.rpm yubikey-ksm.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.3-3 ['1.5-3.fc14', '1.5-3'] yubikey-ksm.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/ykksm/ykksm-config.php 0640L yubikey-ksm.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ykksm-export yubikey-ksm.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ykksm-checksum yubikey-ksm.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ykksm-gen-keys yubikey-ksm.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ykksm-import 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. Non-readable error is false positive. Minor issue - the last changelog entry in the spec uses the wrong version, should bump version and reset the release. OK - package meets naming guidelines OK - spec file name matches base package name OK - meets packaging guidelines OK - meets licensing guidelines OK - license field matches OK - spec in American English OK - spec is legible OK - spec sources match upstream OK - builds in mock OK - no bundled libs OK - owns its directories, does not own files owned by other packages OK - does not list a file more than once OK - permissions are OK OK - consistently uses macros OK - contains code or permissible content OK - files in %doc do not affect runtime OK - filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 637213] Review Request: yubikey-val - The YubiKey Validation Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637213 Ricky Zhou rz...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rz...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Ricky Zhou rz...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 20:52:17 EST --- OK - rpmlint clean yubikey-val-2.7-2.fc14.src.rpm yubikey-val.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://yubikey-val-server-php.googlecode.com/files/yubikey-val-2.7.tgz HTTP Error 404: Not Found 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. yubikey-val-2.7-2.fc14.noarch.rpm yubikey-val.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/ykval/ykval-config.php 0640L yubikey-val.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ykval-export yubikey-val.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ykval-queue yubikey-val.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ykval-import yubikey-val.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ykval-checksum-clients 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. Non-readable error and google code warning are false positives. OK - package meets naming guidelines OK - spec file name matches base package name OK - meets packaging guidelines OK - meets licensing guidelines OK - license field matches OK - spec in American English OK - spec is legible OK - spec sources match upstream OK - builds in mock OK - no bundled libs OK - owns its directories, does not own files owned by other packages OK - does not list a file more than once OK - permissions are OK OK - consistently uses macros OK - contains code or permissible content OK - files in %doc do not affect runtime OK - filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648758] Review Request: supybot-notify - Notification plugin for Supybot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648758 Ricky Zhou rz...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(rz...@redhat.com) |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Ricky Zhou rz...@redhat.com 2011-01-07 21:29:53 EST --- Will fix whitespace issue and add COPYING file in 0.2.1, which will be the first version I'll import. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: supybot-notify Short Description: Notification plugin for Supybot Owners: ricky Branches: f14 el5 el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648758] Review Request: supybot-notify - Notification plugin for Supybot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648758 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-07 21:47:28 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 472676] Review Request: partimage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472676 --- Comment #32 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-07 21:47:05 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666633] Review Request: lastfmlib - library providing implementation of LastFm Submission Protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=33 --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-07 21:47:50 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667205] Review Request: radius-engine - A Lua based real-time 2D graphics game engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667205 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-07 21:48:08 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648758] Review Request: supybot-notify - Notification plugin for Supybot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648758 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648758] Review Request: supybot-notify - Notification plugin for Supybot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648758 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-07 22:17:23 EST --- supybot-notify-0.2.1-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/supybot-notify-0.2.1-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664204] Review Request: perl-BackPAN-Index - Interface to the BackPAN index
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664204 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-08 02:02:28 --- Comment #8 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2011-01-08 02:02:28 EST --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
