[Bug 671862] Review Request: synapse - gnome-do alternative (no mono)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671862 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fab...@bernewireless.net --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2011-01-28 03:18:36 EST --- Your links point to the wrong location. Please add only one package to a review request. If another package is needed as a dependency, use the 'Depends on:' bugzilla feature. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646836] Review Request: rubygem-bundler - Library and utilities to manages a Ruby application's gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646836 Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |rubygem-bundler - The best |rubygem-bundler - Library |way to manage your |and utilities to manages a |application's dependencies |Ruby application's gem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646836] Review Request: rubygem-bundler - Library and utilities to manages a Ruby application's gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646836 Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 03:23:40 EST --- === Package Name: rubygem-bundler Short Description: Library and utilities to manages a Ruby application's gem dependencies Owners: vondruch Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608852] Review Request: epris - a dbus service to listen to music
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608852 --- Comment #14 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2011-01-28 03:29:29 EST --- It seams that your are still looking for a sponsor. Please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673026] Review Request: ukij-tuz-fonts - Uyghur Computer Science Association (UKIJ) Unicode fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673026 --- Comment #2 from James Ni j...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 03:37:20 EST --- Thanks, I have add a simple fontconfig rule file and clean the spec file. You can find new spec file and source rpm in Spec URL: http://jamesni.fedorapeople.org/UKIJTUZFont/ukij-tuz-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://jamesni.fedorapeople.org/UKIJTUZFont/ukij-tuz-fonts-2.0.0-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 205269] Review Request: perl-Sub-Exporter - Sophisticated exporter for custom-built routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205269 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2011-01-28 04:30:19 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Sub-Exporter New Branches: el4 Owners: pghmcfc rmyers I'd like an EPEL-4 branch for perl-Sub-Exporter please. The Fedora maintainer (cweyl) isn't interested in EPEL, and the EPEL-5 maintainer (rmyers) doesn't seem to have been active in Fedora for a few months and hasn't responded to a private email sent on the 5th January. Nevertheless, I'd added him as co-maintainer and he's welcome to the package if at a later date he wants it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673096] Review Request: bamf-qt - Qt bindings and QML plugin for Bamf DBus server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673096 --- Comment #3 from Radek Novacek rnova...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 04:33:53 EST --- Great, one mistake in the package version and I didn't do review at all? I ran into few issues, tell the maintainer on irc and he solved it. So should I paste here all items from ReviewGuidelines with 'PASS' for each? Would it made my review better? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662258] Review Request: ghc-pcre-light - A regex library for Perl 5 compatible regular expressions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662258 Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lakshminaras2...@gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2011-01-28 04:39:52 EST --- My understanding is that the prof libraries are available if someone wants to profile their code in conjunction with the libraries distributed via the devel packages. The prof libraries are not mandatory for developing code as such and hence the split up into -devel and -prof packages. Some users may not want to install prof packages (they pulls in ghc-prof, which is around 40 MB). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597681] Review Request: kupfer - A free software launcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597681 Renich Bon Ciric ren...@woralelandia.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ren...@woralelandia.com --- Comment #10 from Renich Bon Ciric ren...@woralelandia.com 2011-01-28 04:44:08 EST --- I'm up to it. Same problems... http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/kupfer.spec I'll revise these posts and correct accordingly... tomorrow... ;=s -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652987] Review Request: go - The Go programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652987 --- Comment #27 from Renich Bon Ciric ren...@woralelandia.com 2011-01-28 04:49:33 EST --- (In reply to comment #25) Thank you Renich. This version does indeed build in koji. rpmlint has a few complaints about it however. go.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/goinstall go.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/ebnflint go.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/gofmt go.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/godoc go.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/govet go.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/goyacc go.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/cgo go.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/hgpatch 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 325 warnings. The above errors should really be fixed, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Staticly_Linking_Executables A bunch of static libraries were built, and should be in a -static package rather than the main one if included at all. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries Well, I'll see where your discussion with Ed Marshall culminates; not sure of what to do. Many of the binaries are without manual pages or documentation. (Upstream?) Yeah, upstream... let's see if it's possible to generate documentation. Trivial .spec fix? go.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/go-20110120/progs/run go.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/go-20110120/prog.sh go.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/go-20110120/makehtml go.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/go go.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/go-20110120/codelab/wiki/test.sh Done, I eliminated, for now, the executable files from docs and renamed bash_completion/go to go.bash These subpackages should likely include a LICENSE file if nothing else: go-emacs.x86_64: W: no-documentation go-vim.x86_64: W: no-documentation done. Posted: http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/go.spec http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/go-20110120-4.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 653805] Review Request: drupal6-ctools - This suite is primarily a set of APIs and tools to improve the developer experience.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653805 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-28 05:52:43 EST --- drupal6-ctools-1.8-6.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal6-ctools-1.8-6.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664155] Review Request: ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd - A package to access state in monads-fd State Monad
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664155 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 06:07:19 EST --- As earlier discussed on Fedora haskell-devel list, dropping libraries for now from the toplevel of Haskell-pkg-reviews, so we, the Haskell SIG, can focus more on getting Haskell apps into Fedora. To get you library back under the tracker please submit a bin or binlib package that depends on this library and make this bug block that package review. It is a good idea to submit full stacks of packages and then to add the toplevel program to the tracker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630282] Review Request: ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl - Monad-transformer for Control.Exception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 06:07:10 EST --- As earlier discussed on Fedora haskell-devel list, dropping libraries for now from the toplevel of Haskell-pkg-reviews, so we, the Haskell SIG, can focus more on getting Haskell apps into Fedora. To get you library back under the tracker please submit a bin or binlib package that depends on this library and make this bug block that package review. It is a good idea to submit full stacks of packages and then to add the toplevel program to the tracker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660656] Review Request: ghc-data-binary-ieee754- Haskell parser/serialiser library for IEEE754 floating point values
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660656 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 06:07:32 EST --- As earlier discussed on Fedora haskell-devel list, dropping libraries for now from the toplevel of Haskell-pkg-reviews, so we, the Haskell SIG, can focus more on getting Haskell apps into Fedora. To get you library back under the tracker please submit a bin or binlib package that depends on this library and make this bug block that package review. It is a good idea to submit full stacks of packages and then to add the toplevel program to the tracker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656892] Review Request: ghc-augeas - Haskell bindings for the augeas library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656892 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 06:07:22 EST --- As earlier discussed on Fedora haskell-devel list, dropping libraries for now from the toplevel of Haskell-pkg-reviews, so we, the Haskell SIG, can focus more on getting Haskell apps into Fedora. To get you library back under the tracker please submit a bin or binlib package that depends on this library and make this bug block that package review. It is a good idea to submit full stacks of packages and then to add the toplevel program to the tracker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664214] Review Request: ghc-gconf - Binding to the GNOME configuration database system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664214 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 06:07:29 EST --- As earlier discussed on Fedora haskell-devel list, dropping libraries for now from the toplevel of Haskell-pkg-reviews, so we, the Haskell SIG, can focus more on getting Haskell apps into Fedora. To get you library back under the tracker please submit a bin or binlib package that depends on this library and make this bug block that package review. It is a good idea to submit full stacks of packages and then to add the toplevel program to the tracker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660645] Review Request: ghc-monads-tf - A library to provide Monad classes using type families
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660645 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 06:07:03 EST --- As earlier discussed on Fedora haskell-devel list, dropping libraries for now from the toplevel of Haskell-pkg-reviews, so we, the Haskell SIG, can focus more on getting Haskell apps into Fedora. To get you library back under the tracker please submit a bin or binlib package that depends on this library and make this bug block that package review. It is a good idea to submit full stacks of packages and then to add the toplevel program to the tracker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655486] Review Request: ghc-recaptcha - A Haskell library to use reCAPTCHA service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655486 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 06:07:27 EST --- As earlier discussed on Fedora haskell-devel list, dropping libraries for now from the toplevel of Haskell-pkg-reviews, so we, the Haskell SIG, can focus more on getting Haskell apps into Fedora. To get you library back under the tracker please submit a bin or binlib package that depends on this library and make this bug block that package review. It is a good idea to submit full stacks of packages and then to add the toplevel program to the tracker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 06:07:06 EST --- As earlier discussed on Fedora haskell-devel list, dropping libraries for now from the toplevel of Haskell-pkg-reviews, so we, the Haskell SIG, can focus more on getting Haskell apps into Fedora. To get you library back under the tracker please submit a bin or binlib package that depends on this library and make this bug block that package review. It is a good idea to submit full stacks of packages and then to add the toplevel program to the tracker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664208] Review Request: ghc-fingertree - Haskell package provides generic finger-tree structure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664208 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 06:07:13 EST --- As earlier discussed on Fedora haskell-devel list, dropping libraries for now from the toplevel of Haskell-pkg-reviews, so we, the Haskell SIG, can focus more on getting Haskell apps into Fedora. To get you library back under the tracker please submit a bin or binlib package that depends on this library and make this bug block that package review. It is a good idea to submit full stacks of packages and then to add the toplevel program to the tracker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662259] Review Request: git-annex - Manage files with git, without checking their contents in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662259 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 06:07:24 EST --- As earlier discussed on Fedora haskell-devel list, dropping libraries for now from the toplevel of Haskell-pkg-reviews, so we, the Haskell SIG, can focus more on getting Haskell apps into Fedora. To get you library back under the tracker please submit a bin or binlib package that depends on this library and make this bug block that package review. It is a good idea to submit full stacks of packages and then to add the toplevel program to the tracker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662272] Review Request: ghc-utility-ht - Helper functions for Lists, Maybes, Tuples, Functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662272 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 06:07:08 EST --- As earlier discussed on Fedora haskell-devel list, dropping libraries for now from the toplevel of Haskell-pkg-reviews, so we, the Haskell SIG, can focus more on getting Haskell apps into Fedora. To get you library back under the tracker please submit a bin or binlib package that depends on this library and make this bug block that package review. It is a good idea to submit full stacks of packages and then to add the toplevel program to the tracker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664221] Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 06:07:18 EST --- As earlier discussed on Fedora haskell-devel list, dropping libraries for now from the toplevel of Haskell-pkg-reviews, so we, the Haskell SIG, can focus more on getting Haskell apps into Fedora. To get you library back under the tracker please submit a bin or binlib package that depends on this library and make this bug block that package review. It is a good idea to submit full stacks of packages and then to add the toplevel program to the tracker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 660637] Review Request: ghc-xml-types - Haskell library for XML types
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660637 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 06:07:20 EST --- As earlier discussed on Fedora haskell-devel list, dropping libraries for now from the toplevel of Haskell-pkg-reviews, so we, the Haskell SIG, can focus more on getting Haskell apps into Fedora. To get you library back under the tracker please submit a bin or binlib package that depends on this library and make this bug block that package review. It is a good idea to submit full stacks of packages and then to add the toplevel program to the tracker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630273] Review Request: ghc-authenticate - Authentication methods for Haskell web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630273 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | Bug 630273 depends on bug 630272, which changed state. Bug 630272 Summary: Review Request: ghc-tagsoup - Parsing HTML/XML documents library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630272 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 06:07:28 EST --- As earlier discussed on Fedora haskell-devel list, dropping libraries for now from the toplevel of Haskell-pkg-reviews, so we, the Haskell SIG, can focus more on getting Haskell apps into Fedora. To get you library back under the tracker please submit a bin or binlib package that depends on this library and make this bug block that package review. It is a good idea to submit full stacks of packages and then to add the toplevel program to the tracker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630298] Review Request: ghc-sendfile - A portable sendfile library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630298 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 06:07:17 EST --- As earlier discussed on Fedora haskell-devel list, dropping libraries for now from the toplevel of Haskell-pkg-reviews, so we, the Haskell SIG, can focus more on getting Haskell apps into Fedora. To get you library back under the tracker please submit a bin or binlib package that depends on this library and make this bug block that package review. It is a good idea to submit full stacks of packages and then to add the toplevel program to the tracker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630277] Review Request: ghc-control-monad-attempt - Monad transformer for attempt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630277 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | Bug 630277 depends on bug 630270, which changed state. Bug 630270 Summary: Review Request: ghc-transformers - Concrete functor and monad transformers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630270 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 06:07:15 EST --- As earlier discussed on Fedora haskell-devel list, dropping libraries for now from the toplevel of Haskell-pkg-reviews, so we, the Haskell SIG, can focus more on getting Haskell apps into Fedora. To get you library back under the tracker please submit a bin or binlib package that depends on this library and make this bug block that package review. It is a good idea to submit full stacks of packages and then to add the toplevel program to the tracker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630280] Review Request: ghc-MonadCatchIO-transformers - Monad-transformer compatiblibility with Control.Exception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630280 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | Bug 630280 depends on bug 630270, which changed state. Bug 630270 Summary: Review Request: ghc-transformers - Concrete functor and monad transformers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630270 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 06:07:25 EST --- As earlier discussed on Fedora haskell-devel list, dropping libraries for now from the toplevel of Haskell-pkg-reviews, so we, the Haskell SIG, can focus more on getting Haskell apps into Fedora. To get you library back under the tracker please submit a bin or binlib package that depends on this library and make this bug block that package review. It is a good idea to submit full stacks of packages and then to add the toplevel program to the tracker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630271] Review Request: ghc-http-wget - A simple HTTP client that wraps the wget tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630271 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | Bug 630271 depends on bug 630270, which changed state. Bug 630270 Summary: Review Request: ghc-transformers - Concrete functor and monad transformers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630270 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Bug 630271 depends on bug 630223, which changed state. Bug 630223 Summary: Review Request: ghc-failure - A simple type class for success/failure computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630223 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 06:07:21 EST --- As earlier discussed on Fedora haskell-devel list, dropping libraries for now from the toplevel of Haskell-pkg-reviews, so we, the Haskell SIG, can focus more on getting Haskell apps into Fedora. To get you library back under the tracker please submit a bin or binlib package that depends on this library and make this bug block that package review. It is a good idea to submit full stacks of packages and then to add the toplevel program to the tracker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673485] New: Review Request: libldb - A schema-less, ldap like, API and database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libldb - A schema-less, ldap like, API and database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673485 Summary: Review Request: libldb - A schema-less, ldap like, API and database Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sgall...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/packagereview/libldb/libldb.spec SRPM URL: http://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/packagereview/libldb/libldb-0.9.22-7.fc14.src.rpm Description: An extensible library that implements an LDAP like API to access remote LDAP servers, or use local tdb databases. Previously, this was shipped as a subpackage of Samba 4, but it is now seeing its own separate releases from upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673485] Review Request: libldb - A schema-less, ldap like, API and database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673485 --- Comment #1 from Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 06:49:45 EST --- Successfully scratch-built in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2747385 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 652987] Review Request: go - The Go programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652987 --- Comment #28 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 07:08:15 EST --- (In reply to comment #27) Many of the binaries are without manual pages or documentation. (Upstream?) Yeah, upstream... let's see if it's possible to generate documentation. I think the godoc command can provides documentation for go's commands also. go-emacs.x86_64: W: no-documentation I think it should be named emacs-go to conform with the Packaging:Emacs naming guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646836] Review Request: rubygem-bundler - Library and utilities to manages a Ruby application's gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646836 --- Comment #20 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 07:05:01 EST --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-bundler.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-bundler-1.0.9-2.fc14.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2747401 Mo, could you please one more take a look? I did there changes in attempt to make the test suite alive (however not successful for many reasons :/ ), etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667997] Review Request: rubygem-rack-mount - Stackable dynamic tree based Rack router
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667997 Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-01-28 08:21:22 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665995] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995 --- Comment #22 from Damian Wrobel dwro...@ertelnet.rybnik.pl 2011-01-28 08:24:39 EST --- (In reply to comment #21) Yes, works perfectly fine for me. Thanks for review and testing, if there is no other issues I'll request for SCM. Maybe you can tell upstream. Upstream has been informed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648023] Review Request: erlang-js - A Friendly Erlang to Javascript Binding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648023 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2011-01-28 08:38:55 EST --- Ver. 0.5.0-2: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-js.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-js-0.5.0-2.fc12.src.rpm Dropped unneeded runtime dependency on eunit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671884] Review Request: erlang-cluster_info - Cluster info/postmortem inspector for Erlang applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671884 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-28 09:03:06 EST --- Hmm, I don't know how you come up with the version tag... Is there a git tag, I don't see on github? If this is a simply git checkout, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#SnapshotPackages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659005] Review Request: drupal6-job_scheduler - Simple API for scheduling tasks once at a predetermined time or periodically at a fixed interval
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659005 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-28 09:07:14 EST --- drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.5.beta3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.5.beta3.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671884] Review Request: erlang-cluster_info - Cluster info/postmortem inspector for Erlang applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671884 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2011-01-28 09:09:25 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) Hmm, I don't know how you come up with the version tag... Is there a git tag, I don't see on github? If this is a simply git checkout, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#SnapshotPackages Yes, this was my fault. Updated package with proper versioning: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-cluster_info.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-cluster_info-0.1.0-0.1.20101229gitd077716.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659005] Review Request: drupal6-job_scheduler - Simple API for scheduling tasks once at a predetermined time or periodically at a fixed interval
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659005 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-28 09:19:04 EST --- drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.5.beta3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal6-job_scheduler-1.0-0.5.beta3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 597681] Review Request: kupfer - A free software launcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597681 --- Comment #11 from Ratnadeep Debnath rtn...@gmail.com 2011-01-28 09:25:43 EST --- @Renich Bon Ciric You are most welcome to proceed with packaging kupfer. Thanks, buddy. I am right now entangled with so many works at a time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672986] Review Request: freeipa - The Identity, Policy and Audit system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672986 Rob Crittenden rcrit...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-28 09:32:20 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673116] Review Request: perl-Test-Perl-Critic-Progressive - Gradually enforce coding standards
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673116 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648100] Review Request: ghc-xml - A simple XML library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648100 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-28 09:41:20 EST --- ghc-xml-1.3.7-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-xml-1.3.7-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648100] Review Request: ghc-xml - A simple XML library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648100 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-28 09:41:27 EST --- ghc-xml-1.3.7-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-xml-1.3.7-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648100] Review Request: ghc-xml - A simple XML library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648100 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 176253] Review Request: clement - An application to filter and manage E-mail traffic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 --- Comment #32 from j...@safe.ca 2011-01-28 09:47:41 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: clement New Branches: el5 Owners: jmrcpn Most of the clement installation are el5 distribution type. Having clement in EPEL 5 repo will make update process easier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593800] Review Request: python-keyring - keyring module for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593800 --- Comment #57 from Ratnadeep Debnath rtn...@gmail.com 2011-01-28 09:57:23 EST --- python-keyring has been updated to version 0.5.1 and I couldn't upload the packages for some time because of proxy server issues with BSNL 3G. I, somehow, am able to upload and build at koji. The latest packages for python-keyring built successfully for fc15, fc14, fc13. SPEC Url:http://rtnpro.fedorapeople.org/Packages/SPECS/python-keyring.spec SRPM Url:http://rtnpro.fedorapeople.org/Packages/SRPMS/python-keyring-0.5.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Koji Url:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2747641 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669327] Review Request: drupal6-views_bulk_operations - This module augments Views by allowing bulk operations to be executed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669327 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-28 09:58:21 EST --- drupal6-views_bulk_operations-1.10-5.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal6-views_bulk_operations-1.10-5.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634052] Review Request: ghc-ConfigFile - configuration file library for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634052 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||ready Bug 634052 depends on bug 634037, which changed state. Bug 634037 Summary: Review Request: ghc-MissingH - Large utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634037 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 09:55:31 EST --- Updated to cabal-0.22.4: Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-ConfigFile/ghc-ConfigFile.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-ConfigFile/ghc-ConfigFile-1.0.6-3.fc14.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2747651 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 657142] Review Request: ghc-syb - Scrap Your Boilerplate
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657142 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615700] Review Request: ghc-gtksourceview2 - Haskell gtksourceview2 binding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615700 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 612076] Review Request: ghc-feldspar-language - Functional Embedded Language for DSP and PARallelism
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612076 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 629145] Review Request: ghc-cmdargs - Haskell command argument parsing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629145 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 595697] Review Request: ghc-regex-tdfa - Haskell tagged DFA regex engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595697 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 593800] Review Request: python-keyring - keyring module for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593800 --- Comment #59 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-28 10:00:34 EST --- python-keyring-0.5.1-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-keyring-0.5.1-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 651613] Review Request: haddock - Haskell documentation tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651613 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669327] Review Request: drupal6-views_bulk_operations - This module augments Views by allowing bulk operations to be executed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669327 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-28 10:06:12 EST --- drupal6-views_bulk_operations-1.10-5.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal6-views_bulk_operations-1.10-5.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664817] Review Request: perl-HTML-Selector-XPath - CSS Selector to XPath compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664817 --- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2011-01-28 10:17:51 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) Perl packaging guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides says: It is recommended to buildrequire core modules explicitly, because they can move between sub-packages or disappear from core perl. I agree with guidelines that relying on fact the module is currently provided by perl-core is silly. You violently don't want to understand? When a core module moves, building a package will break - Packagers will have to change their packages - mission accomplished. As it's impossible to know which modules will move, it's silly anticipatory obedience to demand such modules to be added now. Worse, such demands are harmful, because a formerly needed dependency may vanish with upstreams updates, a situation which is easy to miss for maintainers. Finally, how do you want to continue with this review? You to continue blocking this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664155] Review Request: ghc-data-accessor-monads-fd - A package to access state in monads-fd State Monad
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664155 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-28 10:16:46 EST --- Would it be possible for you to mark the ones you don't want reviewed as NotReady so that they drop out of the review queue? I might have some time to help but I'm staring at a large pile of ghc-* tickets going back to September, many of which have not been touched at all. If you hide some of them it will make my job much easier and potentially get the ones you want reviewed done faster. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672629] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Tics - Policies for things that make me wince
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672629
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2011-01-28 10:19:24
EST ---
This part of your spec longs for an explanation:
%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=perl
Why not vendor_dir?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630303] Review Request: yesod - Creation of type-safe, RESTful web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630303 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 10:31:08 EST --- BTW latest version is 0.6.7 - as for deps I think mainly just some versions have been bumped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633561] Review Request: tikz-er2 - LaTeX package for creating entity-relationship diagrams
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633561 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-28 10:37:12 EST --- A couple of comments: The upstream version seems to be just 1.0, not 20100913. If you had to pick a specific date to use as a version, though, it seems to me that 20090131 would be more appropriate. It would be really great if upstream could put the license in the actual sty file, because it's not completely clear that the license statement in the wiki actually covers the code, and the documentation (which I note should probably be packaged) says: = This package can be obtained at http://www.assembla.com/spaces/tikz-er2. You can use it free of charge for whatever you want, in whatever way you need. The only thing I ask is that you let me know if you make any modi fications to the package. If they can be useful to everyone, I'll be glad to insert them in the next version, giving the proper credit to the author, of course. = Note that this is not remotely CC-BY. It doesn't seem to include redistribution, for example. Blocking FE-Legal, though I suspect the answer is that we can't package this without clarification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630299] Review Request: ghc-wai - Web Application Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630299 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 10:34:06 EST --- Latest wai for yesod is 0.2.2.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662259] Review Request: git-annex - Manage files with git, without checking their contents in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662259 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) --- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2011-01-28 10:39:59 EST --- This is a top-level package. Doesn't use cabal, but it is Haskell and a binary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630299] Review Request: ghc-wai - Web Application Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630299 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 10:45:02 EST --- Wai is really fast btw: http://docs.yesodweb.com/blog/announcing-warp/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659082] Review Request: redland-bindings - language bindings for redland
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659082
--- Comment #5 from Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2011-01-28 10:46:58
EST ---
Thanks for the update. It is now in much better shape. I still have a few
questions though:
? Do we really need these:
%{?!pybasever:%{expand:%%define pybasever %(%{__python} -c import sys ;
print sys.version[:3])}}
%if %{pybasever} == 2.3
Requires: python-abi = 2.3
%endif
Python-2.3 is a bit too old. I don't even remember what Fedora version came
with it. This is not a blocker but I am curious why you have this in the
specfile.
! php_extdir doesn't match the guideline
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#PECL_Modules
? How about instead of
%attr(664,root,root) %doc perl/example.pl
just
%doc perl/example.pl
? Why is this file a ghost?
%ghost %{python_sitearch}/RDF.pyo
! I am still not sure how to handle the common %doc files. I will send an email
to the packaging list. In case we need a common package, we will probably need
a versioned requires, such as
Requires: redland-bindings = %{version}-%{release}
in the subpackages.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 634025] Review Request: PolarSSL - Light-weight cryptographic and SSL/TLS library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634025 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-28 10:49:20 EST --- Golo, since you seem to be sponsored now, did you want to finish this review? Or, heck, anyone else who has commented here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #28 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2011-01-28 11:07:36 EST --- Real branch name Package Change Request == Package Name: libmemcached New Branches: el5 Owners: remi InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #27 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2011-01-28 11:06:45 EST --- Will build version 0.31 to have EVR RHEL-6 Package Change Request == Package Name: libmemcached New Branches: EL-5 Owners: remi InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662258] Review Request: ghc-pcre-light - A regex library for Perl 5 compatible regular expressions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662258
--- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 11:04:32 EST
---
(In reply to comment #3)
ghc-pcre-light-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-pcre-light-devel
ghc-pcre-light-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/pcre-light-0.4/libHSpcre-light-0.4_p.a
Standard Haskell packaging things. These files are used when profiling the
code
which implies that the -devel package exist.
Shouldn't the libHSpcre-light-0.4_p.a appear in the devel package rather than
in the main package?
Well we have been subpackaging profiling libraries forever like,
since they are normally not needed for development but occasionally
useful when doing profiling builds. Perhaps it would be more correct
to name them devel-prof or something or one day hopefully move to
shared profiling libraries.
-prof subpackages are mentioned in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Haskell
2) There shouldn't be common_summary, common_description, and
ghc_pkg_c_deps
macros since these are only used once. The ghc_pkg_deps line should be
removed
completely because the macro is undefined.
These are also standard Haskell packaging things. I think the %{common_*}
macros are used in the %{?ghc_lib_package} line which is where the -prof and
-devel subpackages are defined.
I don't see any reference to this on the Haskell packaging guidelines page:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Haskell
I have been slowly revising the guidelines, which have become out of date:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Haskell
and hope to submit them for RFC and review soon.
The macros defined in ghc-rpm-macros really help to simplify
Haskell packaging and avoid having to keep close to 100 packages now
in sync with latest evolving packaging (that will soon be close to
300 .spec files).
(In reply to comment #5)
I also don't see a %files section. Is that somehow included by
%{?ghc_lib_package}?
That's correct: the macros handle the repetitive steps of
build, install and filelist generation, since they are essentially
the same for all haskell package built with Cabal.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 497688] Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497688 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2011-01-28 11:09:11 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: php-pecl-memcached New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: remi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658420] Review Request: zorba - General purpose XQuery processor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658420
--- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-01-28
11:14:32 EST ---
Here are the updated files. I hope all issues have been resolved properly.
Spec URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/zorba/zorba.spec
SRPM URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/zorba/zorba-1.4.0-2.fc14.src.rpm
I wasn't able to remove the rpaths using the cmake flags only. There must be
some stuff in the configuration files that prevents removing them
automatically. So I still get rid of them using chrpath.
According to the guidelines [1], Java packages using JNI (and thus containing a
.so file) must be installed in %{_libdir}/%{name}. Therefore, I haven't moved
the jar yet. If this part of the guidelines doesn't apply here for some reason,
please let me know.
[1]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Packaging_JAR_files_that_use_JNI
koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2747764
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667954] Review Request: rubygem-arel - Arel is a Relational Algebra for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667954 --- Comment #7 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 11:19:35 EST --- I can't help myself but I see no failure for AR on my machine: Finished in 308.784244 seconds. 2374 tests, 7372 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors + exit 0 Processing files: rubygem-activerecord-3.0.3-1.fc14.noarch Provides: rubygem(activerecord) = 3.0.3 I have the same gems as you except hoe, which is already updated in repository. Well actually also except Arel, because I have already update to Arel 2.0.7: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-arel.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-arel-2.0.7-1.fc14.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2747780 I hope I will find time to test the AR build in mock on my computer at Monday. Anyway I believe we should continue with Arel 2.0.7 and solve problem with AR later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673545] New: Review Request: python26-virtualenv - Tool to create isolated Python environments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python26-virtualenv - Tool to create isolated Python environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673545 Summary: Review Request: python26-virtualenv - Tool to create isolated Python environments Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmcki...@nexcess.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Note to reviewer: This package provides a copy of Fedora's python-virtualenv package built against Python 2.6 so it works on el5. el6 and Fedora will remain unaffected since they can use existing packages. Spec URL: http://mmckinst.fedorapeople.org/packages/python26-virtualenv/python26-virtualenv.spec SRPM URL: http://mmckinst.fedorapeople.org/packages/python26-virtualenv/python26-virtualenv-1.5.1-2.el5.src.rpm Scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2747964 Description: virtualenv is a tool to create isolated Python environments. virtualenv is a successor to workingenv, and an extension of virtual-python. It is written by Ian Bicking, and sponsored by the Open Planning Project. It is licensed under an MIT-style permissive license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 659082] Review Request: redland-bindings - language bindings for redland
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659082 --- Comment #6 from Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2011-01-28 11:57:36 EST --- Here is the discussion in the packaging list: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2011-January/007593.html (In reply to comment #3) * licensing: I'm not sure what you want me to do. Where do you want me to document them ? I can ask upstream what the situation is, but that will probably take time. I don't think the package itself should block on it, what do you think ? For now I added MPLv1.0 as a license. Until upstream makes things clear, you will need to go into each source file and find out its license, and indicate it as a comment in the specfile. as an example: # python/RDF.py is LGPLv2+ or GPLv2+ or ASL 2.0 or MIT # python/example.py is LGPLv2 or GPLv2 or MPLv1.1 # perl/* are LGPL+ or GPL+ or MPLv? (please check this, I did not see GPL or LGPL or MPL versions in the headers) # ... (list all other files with different licenses) # the rest of the code is licensed with ... %package -n perl-redland License: LGPL+ or GPL+ or MPL %package -n python-redland License: (LGPLv2+ or GPLv2+ or ASL 2.0 or MIT) and (LGPLv2 or GPLv2 or MPLv1.1) and ... etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669509] Review Request: drupal6-rules - It allows site administrators to define conditionally executed actions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669509 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-28 11:59:46 EST --- drupal6-rules-1.4-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal6-rules-1.4-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590305] Review Request: vile - VI Like Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590305 Mark McKinstry mmcki...@nexcess.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Mark McKinstry mmcki...@nexcess.net 2011-01-28 12:07:35 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: vile Short Description: VI Like Emacs Owners: mmckinst Branches: f13 f14 el4 el5 el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670127] Review Request: the-board - A space for placing daily records in your GNOME desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127 --- Comment #6 from Cosimo Cecchi ccec...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 12:10:23 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) the errors should be addressed, the warnings are harmless. New SPEC at the same place: http://people.gnome.org/~cosimoc/the-board-pkg/the-board.spec New SRPM: http://people.gnome.org/~cosimoc/the-board-pkg/the-board-0.1.0-4.fc15.src.rpm But still no new libmx in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 669509] Review Request: drupal6-rules - It allows site administrators to define conditionally executed actions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669509 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-28 12:14:21 EST --- drupal6-rules-1.4-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal6-rules-1.4-4.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668822] Review Request: rubygem-memcache-client - A Ruby library for accessing memcached
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668822
--- Comment #1 from Minnikhanov minnikha...@gmail.com 2011-01-28 12:23:17 EST
---
Some notes:
* License
- Must be pick up one or set another by LICENSE file.
* BuildRoot
- On Fedora BuildRoot line is no longer needed:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
* %check
- Feel free run test suite in a %check section in the rpm
* %clean
- %clean section is no longer needed (on Fedora):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25clean
* Unused macros
- Should use only the defined %geminstdir macro in %files.
* documents / -doc subpackage
- Please consider to split document files (which are not
needed on runtime) to -doc subpackage.
The following files/directories can be moved to -doc subpackage
--
%{gemdir}/doc/%{gemname}-%{version}/
%{geminstdir}/test/
# next line publish in Bugzilla?
%{geminstdir}/Rakefile - I don't know where it must be. May be it need
only for tests.
--
* rpmbuild log:
--
...
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars
warning: File listed
twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/memcache-client-1.8.5/LICENSE.txt
warning: File listed
twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/memcache-client-1.8.5/README.rdoc
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/pkg/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ rm
-rf /home/pkg/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/rubygem-memcache-client-1.8.5-1.fc14.x86_64
+ exit 0
--
- There is twice definition - may be in %files
* rpmlint log:
--
rubygem-memcache-client.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US)
memcached - mem cached, mem-cached, mustached
rubygem-memcache-client.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
memcached - mem cached, mem-cached, mustached
rubygem-memcache-client.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/memcache-client-1.8.5/ri/MemCache/%5b%5d-i.yaml %5b
rubygem-memcache-client.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/memcache-client-1.8.5/ri/MemCache/%5b%5d-i.yaml %5d
rubygem-memcache-client.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/memcache-client-1.8.5/ri/MemCache/raise_on_error_response%21-i.yaml
%21
rubygem-memcache-client.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/memcache-client-1.8.5/ri/EM/SocketConnection/can_read%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-memcache-client.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/memcache-client-1.8.5/ri/MemCache/%5b%5d%3d-i.yaml
%5b
rubygem-memcache-client.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/memcache-client-1.8.5/ri/MemCache/%5b%5d%3d-i.yaml
%5d
rubygem-memcache-client.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/memcache-client-1.8.5/ri/MemCache/%5b%5d%3d-i.yaml
%3d
rubygem-memcache-client.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/memcache-client-1.8.5/ri/EM/SocketConnection/closed%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-memcache-client.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/memcache-client-1.8.5/ri/MemCache/active%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-memcache-client.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/memcache-client-1.8.5/ri/MemCache/Server/alive%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-memcache-client.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/memcache-client-1.8.5/ri/MemCache/check_multithread_status%21-i.yaml
%21
rubygem-memcache-client.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/memcache-client-1.8.5/ri/MemCache/servers%3d-i.yaml
%3d
rubygem-memcache-client.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/memcache-client-1.8.5/ri/MemCache/readonly%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-memcache-client.noarch: W:
hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/memcache-client-1.8.5/.yardoc
rubygem-memcache-client.noarch: W:
hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/memcache-client-1.8.5/.yardoc
rubygem-memcache-client.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary
memcached_top
rubygem-memcache-client.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) memcached
- mem cached, mem-cached, mustached
rubygem-memcache-client.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
memcached - mem cached, mem-cached, mustached
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 20 warnings.
--
* koji scratch build: green
- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2747123
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668824] Review Request: rubygem-text-hyphen - Multilingual word hyphenation according to modified TeX hyphenation pattern files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668824
--- Comment #1 from Minnikhanov minnikha...@gmail.com 2011-01-28 12:31:02 EST
---
Some notes:
* License
- Must be pick up one or set another by LICENSE file.
* BuildRoot
- On Fedora BuildRoot line is no longer needed:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
* %description
- This section is empty. It will be better to fill.
* %install
- rm -rf %{buildroot} at the beginning of %install isn't needed and
should be removed
* %check
- Feel free run test suite in a %check section in the rpm
* %clean
- %clean section is no longer needed (on Fedora):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25clean
* %files
- Should use only the defined %geminstdir macro in %files.
- Some files and folders don't listed here.
* documents / -doc subpackage
- Please consider to split document files (which are not
needed on runtime) to -doc subpackage.
The following files/directories can be moved to -doc subpackage
--
%{gemdir}/doc/%{gemname}-%{version}/
%{geminstdir}/ChangeLog
%{geminstdir}/tests/
# next line publish in Bugzilla?
%{geminstdir}/Rakefile - I don't know where it must be. May be it need
only for tests.
--
* rpmbuild log:
--
...
+ gem install --local
--install-dir
/home/pkg/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/rubygem-text-hyphen-1.0.0-1.fc14.x86_64/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8
--force --rdoc /home/pkg/rpmbuild/SOURCES/text-hyphen-1.0.0.gem
+ /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip /usr/bin/strip
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note /usr/bin/strip /usr/bin/objdump
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile /usr/bin/python 1
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-python-hardlink
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars
warning: File listed
twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/text-hyphen-1.0.0/ChangeLog
warning: File listed
twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/text-hyphen-1.0.0/INSTALL
warning: File listed
twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/text-hyphen-1.0.0/LICENCE
warning: File listed
twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/text-hyphen-1.0.0/README
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/pkg/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ rm
-rf /home/pkg/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/rubygem-text-hyphen-1.0.0-1.fc14.x86_64
+ exit 0
--
- There is twice definition - may be in %files
* rpmlint log:
--
rubygem-text-hyphen.noarch: E: summary-too-long C Multilingual word
hyphenation according to modified TeX hyphenation pattern files
rubygem-text-hyphen.noarch: E: no-description-tag
rubygem-text-hyphen.noarch: E:
non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/text-hyphen-1.0.0/Rakefile
0644L /usr/bin/env
rubygem-text-hyphen.noarch: W:
hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/text-hyphen-1.0.0/.yardoc
rubygem-text-hyphen.noarch: W:
hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/text-hyphen-1.0.0/.yardoc
rubygem-text-hyphen.noarch: E:
non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/text-hyphen-1.0.0/bin/hyphen
0644L /usr/bin/env
rubygem-text-hyphen.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/text-hyphen-1.0.0/ri/Text/Hyphen/clear_cache%21-i.yaml
%21
rubygem-text-hyphen.noarch: E:
non-executable-script
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/text-hyphen-1.0.0/tests/tc_text_hyphen.rb 0644L
/usr/bin/env
rubygem-text-hyphen.src: E: summary-too-long C Multilingual word
hyphenation according to modified TeX hyphenation pattern files
rubygem-text-hyphen.src: E: no-description-tag
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 3 warnings.
--
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 655954] Review Request: drupal6-token - Tokens are small bits of text that can be placed into larger documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655954 Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com 2011-01-28 12:35:05 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: drupal6-token New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: asrob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668824] Review Request: rubygem-text-hyphen - Multilingual word hyphenation according to modified TeX hyphenation pattern files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668824 --- Comment #2 from Minnikhanov minnikha...@gmail.com 2011-01-28 12:54:54 EST --- * %install - Gem have permission 664, need 'chmod 644' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668823] Review Request: rubygem-text-format - Text::Format formats fixed-width text nicely
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668823
--- Comment #1 from Minnikhanov minnikha...@gmail.com 2011-01-28 12:54:14 EST
---
Some notes:
* License
- Must be pick up one or set another by LICENSE file.
* BuildRoot
- On Fedora BuildRoot line is no longer needed:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
* %install
- rm -rf %{buildroot} at the beginning of %install isn't needed and
should be removed
- Gems have permission 664, need 'chmod 644'
* %check
- Feel free run test suite in a %check section in the rpm
* %clean
- %clean section is no longer needed (on Fedora):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25clean
* %files
- Should use only the defined %geminstdir macro in %files.
* documents / -doc subpackage
- Please consider to split document files (which are not
needed on runtime) to -doc subpackage.
The following files/directories can be moved to -doc subpackage
--
%{gemdir}/doc/%{gemname}-%{version}/
%{geminstdir}/Changelog
%{geminstdir}/tests/
%{geminstdir}/Rakefile
--
* rpmbuild log:
--
...
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-python-hardlink
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars
warning: File listed
twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/text-format-1.0.0/Changelog
warning: File listed
twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/text-format-1.0.0/Install
warning: File listed
twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/text-format-1.0.0/README
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/pkg/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ rm
-rf /home/pkg/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/rubygem-text-format-1.0.0-1.fc14.x86_64
+ exit 0
--
* rpmlint log:
--
rubygem-text-format.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/text-format-1.0.0/ri/Text/Format/Number/%5b%5d-i.yaml
%5b
rubygem-text-format.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/text-format-1.0.0/ri/Text/Format/Number/%5b%5d-i.yaml
%5d
rubygem-text-format.noarch: E:
zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/text-format-1.0.0/metaconfig
rubygem-text-format.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/text-format-1.0.0/ri/Text/Format/Alpha/%5b%5d-i.yaml
%5b
rubygem-text-format.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/text-format-1.0.0/ri/Text/Format/Alpha/%5b%5d-i.yaml
%5d
rubygem-text-format.noarch: W:
hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/text-format-1.0.0/.yardoc
rubygem-text-format.noarch: W:
hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/text-format-1.0.0/.yardoc
rubygem-text-format.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/text-format-1.0.0/ri/Text/Format/right_align%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-text-format.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/text-format-1.0.0/ri/Text/Format/Roman/%5b%5d-i.yaml
%5b
rubygem-text-format.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/text-format-1.0.0/ri/Text/Format/Roman/%5b%5d-i.yaml
%5d
rubygem-text-format.noarch: E:
non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/text-format-1.0.0/Rakefile
0644L /usr/bin/env
rubygem-text-format.noarch: E:
wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/text-format-1.0.0/Rakefile
rubygem-text-format.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/text-format-1.0.0/ri/Text/Format/%3d%3d-i.yaml %3d
rubygem-text-format.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/text-format-1.0.0/ri/Text/Format/%3d%3d-i.yaml %3d
rubygem-text-format.noarch: W:
file-not-utf8 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/text-format-1.0.0/README
rubygem-text-format.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/text-format-1.0.0/ri/Text/Format/justify%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-text-format.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/text-format-1.0.0/ri/Text/Format/right_fill%3f-i.yaml
%3f
rubygem-text-format.noarch: E:
non-executable-script
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/text-format-1.0.0/tests/testall.rb 0644L
/usr/bin/env
rubygem-text-format.noarch: W:
unexpanded-macro
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/text-format-1.0.0/ri/Text/Format/left_align%3f-i.yaml
%3f
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 15 warnings.
--
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668822] Review Request: rubygem-memcache-client - A Ruby library for accessing memcached
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668822 --- Comment #2 from Minnikhanov minnikha...@gmail.com 2011-01-28 12:54:36 EST --- * %install - Gems have permission 664, need 'chmod 644' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665168] Review Request: nautilus-sendto-trac - Nautilus context menu for sending files to Trac
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665168 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2011-01-28 13:14:48 EST --- [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture Tested F-14: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2748094 Tested F-15: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2748103 [x] Timestamps preserved with cp and install [x] Package functions as described I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670127] Review Request: the-board - A space for placing daily records in your GNOME desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 13:29:08 EST --- I still get $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm the-board.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/libexec/the-board-start ['/usr/lib64'] the-board.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary the-board the-board-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation the-board-nautilus.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. so I guess --disable-rpath is not good enough -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 576591] Review Request: iptraf-ng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576591 Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|terje...@phys.ntnu.no Status Whiteboard|NotReady| Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #18 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no 2011-01-28 13:39:42 EST --- Formal review: ok - package meets naming and versioning guidelines ! - source files match upstream: no tarball available ok - specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently ok - dist tag is present ok - build root is correct ! - license field matches the actual license most parts is GPLv2+, however some files has unclear license: bar.c cidr.c getpath.c ipcsum.c mode.c tr.c most *.h files are missing license info. You must contact the author (Gerard Paul Java) about these problems. ok - license is open source-compatible ok - license text included in package ok - latest version is being packaged ok - BuildRequires are proper and compiler flags are appropriate koji is happy, however there are some warning you might want to look at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2748127name=build.log ok - %clean is present ok - package builds in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2748127 ok - package installs properly, even works ok - debuginfo package looks complete ! rpmlint is silent invalid-url Source0: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/i/p/iptraf-ng/iptraf-ng-1.0.3.55.gae6e.dirty.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.2-3 ['1.0.3.55.gae6e.dirty-1.fc13', '1.0.3.55.gae6e.dirty-1'] ok - final provides and requires are sane ok - owns the directories it creates ok -doesn't own any directories it shouldn't ok -no duplicates in %files ok -file permissions are appropriate ok- documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary ok -%docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package Summary: o include the obsolete/provides in comment #15. o upload a tarball o fix changelog o fix the license issue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 479874] Review Request: mingw32-postgresql - postgresql development library's libpq
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874 Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(itamar@ispbrasil. ||com.br) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671862] Review Request: synapse - gnome-do alternative (no mono)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671862 --- Comment #3 from Renich Bon Ciric ren...@woralelandia.com 2011-01-28 13:53:18 EST --- Ups, I'm so sorry; here they are: http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/libzeitgeist.spec http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/synapse.spec I updated this because I added more specs and forgot to notify you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670127] Review Request: the-board - A space for placing daily records in your GNOME desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127 Colin Walters walt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||walt...@redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Colin Walters walt...@redhat.com 2011-01-28 14:11:01 EST --- One complicating issue is if the-board uses gobject-introspection, the rpath is necessary for the dumper to work correctly. You'll have to use chrpath --delete after the build is complete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664113] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ebs-delivery-plugin - BoxGrinder plugin to deliver appliances as EBS AMIs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664113 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||rubygem-boxgrinder-build-eb ||s-delivery-plugin-0.0.4-1.f ||c14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-01-28 14:18:22 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664113] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ebs-delivery-plugin - BoxGrinder plugin to deliver appliances as EBS AMIs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664113 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-28 14:18:17 EST --- rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ebs-delivery-plugin-0.0.4-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 642858] Review Request: drupal6-footnotes - Allows to easily create automatically numbered footnote references
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642858 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-28 14:21:32 EST --- drupal6-footnotes-2.5-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664111] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-s3-delivery-plugin - BoxGrinder plugin to deliver appliances to S3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664111 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|rubygem-boxgrinder-build-s3 |rubygem-boxgrinder-build-s3 |-delivery-plugin-0.0.5-2.fc |-delivery-plugin-0.0.5-2.fc |14 |13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664113] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ebs-delivery-plugin - BoxGrinder plugin to deliver appliances as EBS AMIs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664113 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-28 14:21:16 EST --- rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ebs-delivery-plugin-0.0.4-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648100] Review Request: ghc-xml - A simple XML library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648100 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-28 14:19:24 EST --- ghc-xml-1.3.7-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc-xml'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-xml-1.3.7-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664111] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-s3-delivery-plugin - BoxGrinder plugin to deliver appliances to S3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664111 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-28 14:19:00 EST --- rubygem-boxgrinder-build-s3-delivery-plugin-0.0.5-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664111] Review Request: rubygem-boxgrinder-build-s3-delivery-plugin - BoxGrinder plugin to deliver appliances to S3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664111 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-28 14:22:59 EST --- rubygem-boxgrinder-build-s3-delivery-plugin-0.0.5-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
