[Bug 646836] Review Request: rubygem-bundler - Library and utilities to manages a Ruby application's gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646836 Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-01-31 03:51:49 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-bundler Short Description: Library and utilities to manages a Ruby application's gem dependencies Owners: vondruch Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 650667] Review Request: hitori - Hitori game for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650667 --- Comment #13 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-01-31 03:55:17 EST --- OK, looks good. The package can be approved as soon as you're sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664817] Review Request: perl-HTML-Selector-XPath - CSS Selector to XPath compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664817 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|ppi...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-01-31 04:31:50 EST --- I understand perfectly. The guidelines says you should explicitly depend because it can move to different package. At fist you can prevent problem now, you do not need to wait for breaking things later. At second the package builds even after `breakage'. It will just use old possibly buggy module. Adding explicit dependency you assure using latest dual-lived package. This question is not about willing or not willing. This is about compliance to guidelines. As the spec file does not comply to guidelines statement I quoted above, I cannot approve this package. You can try your luck with another reviewer, although I think the guidelines are the same for all reviewers and packagers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672629] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Tics - Policies for things that make me wince
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672629 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-01-31 04:35:42 EST --- Because vendor directory is reserved for third-party packages. We are trying to allow administrators to overlay Perl modules with their own repositories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674008] New: Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 Summary: Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t...@niemueller.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/robotics/openrave.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/robotics/openrave-0.2.18-0.1.svn1975.fc14.src.rpm Description: OpenRAVE is targeted for real-world autonomous robot applications, and includes a seamless integration of 3-D simulation, visualization, planning, scripting and control. Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2748421 rpmlint: # rpmlint openrave.spec openrave.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: openrave-0.2.18-svn1975.tar.gz 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - Warning is ok, source must be built from svn # rpmlint openrave-0.2.18-0.1.svn1975.fc14.x86_64.rpm openrave-devel-0.2.18-0.1.svn1975.fc14.x86_64.rpm openrave-python-0.2.18-0.1.svn1975.fc14.x86_64.rpm openrave-octave-0.2.18-0.1.svn1975.fc14.x86_64.rpm openrave.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libopenrave-core.so.0.2.18 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 - Will contact upstream about this, it is in once place and it is of the kind should never happen. openrave.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/openrave.bash - intended openrave.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/openrave-0.2.18/AUTHORS - minor openrave.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openrave openrave-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openrave-config openrave-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation openrave-python.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openrave.py openrave-python.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openrave-hash.py openrave-octave.x86_64: W: no-documentation - do not exist openrave-octave.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/libexec/octave/packages/openrave-0.2.18/orcreate.mex openrave-octave.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/libexec/octave/packages/openrave-0.2.18/orwrite.mex openrave-octave.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/libexec/octave/packages/openrave-0.2.18/orread.mex - Octave thing as it seems 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 12 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674006] Review Request: openni - Library for human-machine Natural Interaction
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674006 Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||674007 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674007] Review Request: openni-primesense - PrimeSensor/Kinect Modules for OpenNI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674007 Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||674006 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674007] New: Review Request: openni-primesense - PrimeSensor/Kinect Modules for OpenNI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: openni-primesense - PrimeSensor/Kinect Modules for OpenNI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674007 Summary: Review Request: openni-primesense - PrimeSensor/Kinect Modules for OpenNI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t...@niemueller.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/robotics/openni-primesense.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/robotics/openni-primesense-5.0.0.25-0.1_git894cea01.fc14.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.openni.org and https://github.com/ros-pkg-git/Sensor Description: This modules enables OpenNI to make use of the PrimeSense, also known as Kinect depth camera. Koji: Possible only after openni has been accepted and is tagged into the build root rpmlint: openni-primesense.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: openni-primesense-5.0.0.25-git894cea01.tar.gz openni-primesense.src: W: invalid-url Source0: openni-primesense-5.0.0.25-git894cea01.tar.gz - no tarballs are released, need to pull from git openni-primesense.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 5.0.0.24-0.1gitc0e70ea1 ['5.0.0.25-0.1_git894cea01.fc14', '5.0.0.25-0.1_git894cea01'] - no dist tag in changelog openni-primesense.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libXnDeviceSensorV2.so openni-primesense.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libXnCore.so openni-primesense.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libXnFormats.so openni-primesense.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libXnDeviceFile.so openni-primesense.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libXnDDK.so - their build system does not produce soname/soversion. Will try to add something and get it accepted upstream later. openni-primesense.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/openni-primesense-5.0.0.25/LGPL.txt openni-primesense.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/openni-primesense-5.0.0.25/README - minor openni-primesense.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary XnSensorServer - does not exist, but binary is usually executed automatically in the background anyway. 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674006] New: Review Request: openni - Library for human-machine Natural Interaction
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: openni - Library for human-machine Natural Interaction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674006 Summary: Review Request: openni - Library for human-machine Natural Interaction Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t...@niemueller.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/robotics/openni.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/robotics/openni-1.0.0.25-0.1_git4c9ff978.fc14.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.openni.org Description: OpenNI (Open Natural Interaction) is a multi-language, cross-platform framework that defines APIs for writing applications utilizing Natural Interaction. OpenNI APIs are composed of a set of interfaces for writing NI applications. The main purpose of OpenNI is to form a standard API that enables communication with both: * Vision and audio sensors * Vision and audio perception middleware Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2750188 rpmlint: openni.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: openni-1.0.0.25-git4c9ff978.tar.gz openni.src: W: invalid-url Source0: openni-1.0.0.25-git4c9ff978.tar.gz - no tarballs are released, need to pull from git openni.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi - mulch, mufti openni.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US middleware - middle ware, middle-ware, middleweight openni.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi - mulch, mufti openni.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US middleware - middle ware, middle-ware, middleweight - false positives openni.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.0.25-0.1git4c9ff978.fc14 ['1.0.0.25-0.1_git4c9ff978.fc14', '1.0.0.25-0.1_git4c9ff978'] - no dist tag in changelog openni.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libOpenNI.so openni.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libnimMockNodes.so openni.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libnimCodecs.so openni.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libNiSampleModule.so openni.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libnimRecorder.so - their build system does not produce soname/soversion. Will try to add something and get it accepted upstream later. openni.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary niLicense openni.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary niReg openni-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation openni-samples.x86_64: W: no-documentation openni-samples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary NiCRead openni-samples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary NiConvertXToONI openni-samples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary NiAudioSample openni-samples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary NiViewer openni-samples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary NiBackRecorder openni-samples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary NiUserTracker openni-samples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary NiRecordSynthetic openni-samples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary NiSimpleCreate openni-samples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary NiSimpleRead openni-samples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary NiSimpleViewer - does not exist, -doc contains the doxygen documentation... 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 26 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674009] New: Review Request: bitten - A continuous integration plugin for Trac
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bitten - A continuous integration plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674009 Summary: Review Request: bitten - A continuous integration plugin for Trac Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t...@niemueller.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/bitten/bitten.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/bitten/bitten-0.6b3-0.1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Bitten is a Python-based framework for collecting various software metrics via continuous integration. It builds on Trac to provide an integrated web-based user interface. Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2752033 rpmlint: bitten.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) plugin - plug in, plug-in, plugging bitten-master.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) plugin - plug in, plug-in, plugging - false positive bitten-master.noarch: W: no-documentation bitten-slave.noarch: W: no-documentation bitten-slave.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bitten-slave - does not exist bitten-master.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/bitten/templates/bitten_admin_configs.html bitten-master.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/bitten/templates/bitten_config.html bitten-master.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/bitten/templates/bitten_summary_coverage.html bitten-master.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/bitten/templates/bitten_admin_master.html bitten-master.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/bitten/templates/bitten_summary_tests.html bitten-master.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/bitten/templates/bitten_build.html - HTML templates, need no shebang bitten-slave.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/bitten-slave bitten-slave bitten-slave.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/bitten-slave bitten-slave bitten-slave.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/bitten-slave.conf bitten-slave bitten-slave.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/bitten-slave.conf bitten-slave bitten-slave.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/bitten-slave.conf 0640L bitten-slave.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun userdel - These are all related. We create a bitten-slave user. The bitten slave is run as this user and it needs to write to its $HOME at /var/lib/bitten-slave (checking out code and building it). The configuration file may contain authentication information, hence should not be world-readable. Since it must be readable by the bitten-slave user, it is owned by this user. The user is only deleted on uninstall, not on an upgrade, and since it is a system user specifically for bitten-slave we think it is safe to delete it. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 10 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671393] Review Request: trytond-account-be - account-be for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671393 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:23:00 --- Comment #10 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:23:00 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671400] Review Request: trytond-account - account for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671400 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:23:35 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:23:35 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671398] Review Request: trytond-account-invoice - account-invoice for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671398 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:23:23 --- Comment #9 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:23:23 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671402] Review Request: trytond-analytic-account - analytic-account for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671402 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:23:46 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:23:46 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671401] Review Request: trytond-account-statement - account-statement for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671401 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:23:41 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:23:41 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671396] Review Request: trytond-account-invoice-history - account-invoice-history for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671396 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:23:12 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:23:12 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671397] Review Request: trytond-account-invoice-line-standalone - account-invoice-line-standalone for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671397 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:23:17 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:23:17 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671429] Review Request: trytond-project - project for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671429 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:26:18 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:26:18 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671403] Review Request: trytond-analytic-invoice - analytic-invoice for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671403 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:23:52 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:23:52 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671410] Review Request: trytond-company - company for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671410 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:24:35 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:24:35 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671441] Review Request: trytond-stock-supply - stock-supply for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671441 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:27:27 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:27:27 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671420] Review Request: trytond-party - party for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671420 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:25:32 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:25:32 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671433] Review Request: trytond-sale-price-list - sale-price-list for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671433 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:26:41 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:26:41 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671425] Review Request: trytond-product - product for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671425 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:26:00 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:26:00 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671412] Review Request: trytond-country - country for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671412 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:24:47 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:24:47 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671415] Review Request: trytond-google-maps - google-maps for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671415 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:25:03 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:25:03 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671421] Review Request: trytond-party-vcarddav - party-vcarddav for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671421 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:25:37 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:25:37 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671417] Review Request: trytond-ldap-authentication - ldap-authentication for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671417 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:25:14 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:25:14 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671418] Review Request: trytond-ldap-connection - ldap-connection for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671418 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:25:20 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:25:20 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671399] Review Request: trytond-account-product - account-product for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671399 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:23:29 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:23:29 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671409] Review Request: trytond-calendar-todo - calendar-todo for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671409 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:24:29 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:24:29 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671408] Review Request: trytond-calendar - calendar for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671408 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:24:24 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:24:24 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671419] Review Request: trytond-party-siret - party-siret for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671419 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:25:26 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:25:26 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671416] Review Request: trytond-google-translate - google-translate for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671416 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:25:09 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:25:09 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671439] Review Request: trytond-stock - stock for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671439 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:27:16 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:27:16 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671434] Review Request: trytond-sale - sale for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671434 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:26:47 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:26:47 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671431] Review Request: trytond-purchase - purchase for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671431 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:26:29 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:26:29 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671413] Review Request: trytond-currency - currency for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671413 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:24:52 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:24:52 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671442] Review Request: trytond-timesheet - timesheet for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671442 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:27:33 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:27:33 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671414] Review Request: trytond-dashboard - dashboard for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671414 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:24:57 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:24:57 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671426] Review Request: trytond-project-plan - project-plan for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671426 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:26:06 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:26:06 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671405] Review Request: trytond-analytic-sale - analytic-sale for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671405 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:24:06 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:24:06 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671435] Review Request: trytond-stock-forecast - stock-forecast for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671435 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:26:53 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:26:53 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671428] Review Request: trytond-project-revenue - project-revenue for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671428 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:26:11 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:26:11 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671437] Review Request: trytond-stock-location-sequence - stock-location-sequence for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671437 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:27:05 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:27:05 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671436] Review Request: trytond-stock-inventory-location - stock-inventory-location for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671436 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:26:59 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:26:59 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671440] Review Request: trytond-stock-supply-day - stock-supply-day for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671440 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:27:22 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:27:22 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671411] Review Request: trytond-company-work-time - company-work-time for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671411 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:24:41 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:24:41 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671404] Review Request: trytond-analytic-purchase - analytic-purchase for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671404 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:24:00 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:24:00 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671432] Review Request: trytond-sale-opportunity - sale-opportunity for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671432 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:26:35 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:26:35 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671422] Review Request: trytond-product-cost-fifo - product-cost-fifo for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671422 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:25:43 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:25:43 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671424] Review Request: trytond-product-price-list - product-price-list for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671424 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:25:54 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:25:54 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671407] Review Request: trytond-calendar-scheduling - calendar-scheduling for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671407 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:24:17 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:24:17 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671423] Review Request: trytond-product-cost-history - product-cost-history for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671423 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:25:48 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:25:48 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671438] Review Request: trytond-stock-product-location - stock-product-location for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671438 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:27:10 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:27:10 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671430] Review Request: trytond-purchase-invoice-line-standalone - purchase-invoice-line-standalone for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671430 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:26:23 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:26:23 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 671406] Review Request: trytond-calendar-classification - calendar-classification for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671406 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:24:11 --- Comment #7 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2011-01-31 05:24:11 EST --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672629] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Tics - Policies for things that make me wince
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672629 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rc040...@freenet.de Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2011-01-31 05:24:33 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) Because vendor directory is reserved for third-party packages. We are trying to allow administrators to overlay Perl modules with their own repositories. Upstream perl reference please. If what you say applies, this would be a fundamential change in fedora's perl-packaging policy, because so far, it had been convention to consider Fedora == vendor. Consider all of your packages which are not installing to vendor_dir blocked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672629] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Tics - Policies for things that make me wince
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672629 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-01-31 05:44:55 EST --- This is Fedora specific issue, not upstr(In reply to comment #3) Upstream perl reference please. This is Fedora effort, not upstream one. If what you say applies, this would be a fundamential change in fedora's perl-packaging policy, because so far, it had been convention to consider Fedora == vendor. Convention, not a policy. The location is not standardized in Perl Packaging Guidelines. This has been decided by `perl' package owner (mmaslano) about half year ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673784] Rename Request: mingw32-filesystem - cross-filesystem - Cross compiler base filesystem and environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673784 --- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2011-01-31 05:52:25 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) As mentioned on the link in the initial message the plan is to rename all current mingw32-* package to cross-*. With all due respect, to me this plan is beyond reason, because mingw, rsp. their 2 sub targets mingw32 and mingw64 are only a very small subset of cross-targets. I'm okay with using a different prefix like the crossdesktop-* which Richard suggested if you prefer that IMO, mingw-filesystem would be an appropriate name, because that's what it currently is - The rest of it is wishful thinking. The target name x86_64-w64-mingw32 might look a bit odd for outsiders, but it's the default target name used by the mingw-w64 developers. Well, ... this doesn't mean their decisions are wise ;) x86_64-w64-mingw32 (cpu=x86_64, os=mingw32) is multiply problematic: - the 32 in mingw32 originally stood for MinGW on 32bit Windows, = a 64bit MinGW for MinGW on 64bit Windows should be named mingw64 - Configure scripts currently presume os=mingw32 to imply 32bit MinGW. ... I.e. to me reasonable choices would be x86_64-pc-mingw + i686-pc-mingw or x86_64-pc-mingw64 + i686-pc-mingw32 I just dropped the question about the history behind that name in the #mingw-w64 IRC channel and I got multiple answers back. The main reason is compatibility. Think about the autotools where a large amount of checks look for the term 'mingw32' in the target to find out whether the target is a MS Windows one. When the 'w64' part in the target name is used The 2nd field of a target-triple is the vendor/manufacturer field, which originally was meant to be the hard-ware manufacturer of a specific board, which later became abused by Linux-vendors to put their brand into (*-redhat-*, *-suse-*). I.e. if mingw wants to follow the HW vendor path, their 2nd field should be pc (The generic value), rsp, if they want to follow the SW vendor path, it should be microsoft. In any case, the vendor field is without much practical importance and unused in 99% of all configure scripts (ignored). What matters are the cpu-field and the OS field - They need to provide sufficient information for configure scripts to destinguish architectures and OSes. That said, I consider x86_64-w64-mingw32 to be a mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670860] Review Request: trytond-modules - Modules for Tryton
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670860 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-01-31 05:54:47 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673784] Rename Request: mingw32-filesystem - cross-filesystem - Cross compiler base filesystem and environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673784 --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2011-01-31 06:17:04 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) I'm okay with using a different prefix like the crossdesktop-* which Richard suggested if you prefer that IMO, mingw-filesystem would be an appropriate name, because that's what it currently is - The rest of it is wishful thinking. mingw has always been an unfortunate choice of name. Really the cross-compiler has very little to do with the mingw.org project. mingw-w64 is a completely separate fork. And there is a separate mingw.org-related binary project which is nothing to do with us, but people frequently get confused over the two. And *crucially* we are adding support for Mac OS X which doesn't use mingw at all. This is why I'm suggesting crossdesktop-* or some other choice which doesn't involve the 5 letters mingw. The target name x86_64-w64-mingw32 might look a bit odd for outsiders, but it's the default target name used by the mingw-w64 developers. Well, ... this doesn't mean their decisions are wise ;) x86_64-w64-mingw32 (cpu=x86_64, os=mingw32) is multiply problematic: - the 32 in mingw32 originally stood for MinGW on 32bit Windows, = a 64bit MinGW for MinGW on 64bit Windows should be named mingw64 - Configure scripts currently presume os=mingw32 to imply 32bit MinGW. ... I.e. to me reasonable choices would be x86_64-pc-mingw + i686-pc-mingw or x86_64-pc-mingw64 + i686-pc-mingw32 Whatever you think doesn't really matter, since this is the choice of the mingw-w64 upstream project. They are in a much better situation to judge how it should work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667954] Review Request: rubygem-arel - Arel is a Relational Algebra for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667954 --- Comment #8 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-01-31 06:28:07 EST --- I have tested activerecord in mock today and the result is: 1) I can build activerecord with Arel-2.0.2 or 2.0.7 equally well when I use sqlite3-ruby 1.3.3 2) I can't build activerecord with Arel-2.0.2 neither with 2.0.7 while using rubygem-sqlite3-ruby 1.2.4, which is the default in rawhide. Going to ping sqlite3 maintainers for update. However I am not sure what impact it will have on other packgages ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667954] Review Request: rubygem-arel - Arel is a Relational Algebra for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667954 --- Comment #9 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-01-31 06:30:02 EST --- This is the bugtrace: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/sqlite3-ruby-1.2.4/lib/sqlite3/driver/native/driver.rb:76: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.8.7 (2010-12-23 patchlevel 330) [x86_64-linux] rake aborted! Command failed with status (): [/usr/bin/ruby -w -Ilib:test:test/connecti...] /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:994:in `sh' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:1009:in `call' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:1009:in `sh' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:1093:in `sh' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:1028:in `ruby' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:1093:in `ruby' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake/testtask.rb:116:in `define' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb::in `verbose' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake/testtask.rb:101:in `define' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:635:in `call' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:635:in `execute' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:630:in `each' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:630:in `execute' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:596:in `invoke_with_call_chain' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/monitor.rb:242:in `synchronize' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:589:in `invoke_with_call_chain' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:582:in `invoke' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2050:in `invoke_task' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2028:in `top_level' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2028:in `each' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2028:in `top_level' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2067:in `standard_exception_handling' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2022:in `top_level' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2000:in `run' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2067:in `standard_exception_handling' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:1997:in `run' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/bin/rake:31 /usr/bin/rake:19:in `load' /usr/bin/rake:19 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672629] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Tics - Policies for things that make me wince
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672629 --- Comment #5 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-01-31 06:37:57 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) Because vendor directory is reserved for third-party packages. We are trying to allow administrators to overlay Perl modules with their own repositories. Upstream perl reference please. If what you say applies, this would be a fundamential change in fedora's perl-packaging policy, because so far, it had been convention to consider Fedora == vendor. Consider all of your packages which are not installing to vendor_dir blocked. It was convention, but in F-13 were paths cut and vendor has the same path as core perl. You didn't disagree with this change, which was similarly fundamental. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672629] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Tics - Policies for things that make me wince
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672629 --- Comment #6 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-01-31 06:38:50 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) This is Fedora specific issue, not upstr(In reply to comment #3) Upstream perl reference please. This is Fedora effort, not upstream one. If what you say applies, this would be a fundamential change in fedora's perl-packaging policy, because so far, it had been convention to consider Fedora == vendor. Convention, not a policy. The location is not standardized in Perl Packaging Guidelines. This has been decided by `perl' package owner (mmaslano) about half year ago. I wrote a proposal, not a policy. No-one commented it yet, I'd like to take this issue back to our mailing list to discuss. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670451] Review Request: async-http-client - Asynchronous Http Client for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670451 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-01-31 06:52:09 --- Comment #9 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-01-31 06:52:09 EST --- Done in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=215944 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673784] Rename Request: mingw32-filesystem - cross-filesystem - Cross compiler base filesystem and environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673784 --- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2011-01-31 06:53:37 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) (In reply to comment #6) I'm okay with using a different prefix like the crossdesktop-* which Richard suggested if you prefer that IMO, mingw-filesystem would be an appropriate name, because that's what it currently is - The rest of it is wishful thinking. mingw has always been an unfortunate choice of name. I disagree - It would have been the appropriate choice. And *crucially* we are adding support for Mac OS X which doesn't use mingw at all. Well, has the licence/copyright situation changed? To my knowledge MacOSX requires non-free code from Apple. The target name x86_64-w64-mingw32 might look a bit odd for outsiders, but it's the default target name used by the mingw-w64 developers. Well, ... this doesn't mean their decisions are wise ;) x86_64-w64-mingw32 (cpu=x86_64, os=mingw32) is multiply problematic: - the 32 in mingw32 originally stood for MinGW on 32bit Windows, = a 64bit MinGW for MinGW on 64bit Windows should be named mingw64 - Configure scripts currently presume os=mingw32 to imply 32bit MinGW. ... I.e. to me reasonable choices would be x86_64-pc-mingw + i686-pc-mingw or x86_64-pc-mingw64 + i686-pc-mingw32 Whatever you think doesn't really matter, Correct. since this is the choice of the mingw-w64 upstream project. They are in a much better situation to judge how it should work. I disagree. One thing I had learnt with MinGW is them being Windows focused folks with little GNU SW experience - One of the situation this shows is situations like these. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670451] Review Request: async-http-client - Asynchronous Http Client for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670451 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665995] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995 Damian Wrobel dwro...@ertelnet.rybnik.pl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Damian Wrobel dwro...@ertelnet.rybnik.pl 2011-01-31 07:43:30 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: fmit Short Description: Free Music Instrument Tuner Owners: dwrobel Branches: f13 f14 f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662301] Review Request: plotdrop - A minimal GNOME front-end to Gnuplot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662301 Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com 2011-01-31 07:45:06 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: plotdrop Short Description: A minimal GNOME front-end to Gnuplot Owners: sagarun Branches: F-14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673589] Review Request: UpTools - C++ library for hpc, networking, db, memory, etc.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673589 --- Comment #4 from seb...@gmail.com 2011-01-31 07:53:40 EST --- Created attachment 476176 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=476176 Spec fixes This the fixes according Jussi Lehtola. Fixed: *Styles mixing *Drop . ant the end Summary *Fixed BuildRoot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673589] Review Request: UpTools - C++ library for hpc, networking, db, memory, etc.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673589
--- Comment #5 from seb...@gmail.com 2011-01-31 08:11:44 EST ---
New SPEC URL: http://pastebin.com/4HyTTH0N
Jussi, thanks for taking the time for view the package.
I've made the suggested changes to spec file.
Please bear in mind that UpTools is a young project.
Because of it, we would want that users can learn how to use it through
examples in %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/tests/*
The are documentation files.
There are not examples to test the suite in the automake make check style.
I'd be glad to get your feedback and sponsorship.
Below you there is the rmplint output:
uptools.spec:119: W: macro-in-comment %pre
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.
uptools.spec: I: checking-url
http://www.palermo.edu/ingenieria/UpTools-8.5.4.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds)
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
UpTools.i686: I: checking
UpTools.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) hpc - hp, pc, hic
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
UpTools.i686: W: name-repeated-in-summary C UpTools
The name of the package is repeated in its summary. This is often redundant
information and looks silly in various programs' output. Make the summary
brief and to the point without including redundant information in it.
UpTools.i686: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 8.5.4 ['8.5.4-1.fc14',
'8.5.4-1']
The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not
coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package.
UpTools.i686: I: checking-url
http://www.palermo.edu/ingenieria/uptools_ingles.html (timeout 10 seconds)
UpTools.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libUpTools.so
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
UpTools.i686: W: one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig
You should use %post -p command instead of using: %post command It will
avoid the fork of a shell interpreter to execute your command as well as
allows rpm to automatically mark the dependency on your command for the
excecution of the scriptlet.
UpTools.i686: W: one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig
You should use %postun -p command instead of using: %postun command It
will avoid the fork of a shell interpreter to execute your command as well as
allows rpm to automatically mark the dependency on your command for the
excecution of the scriptlet.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
UpTools-devel.i686: I: checking
UpTools-devel.i686: I: checking-url
http://www.palermo.edu/ingenieria/uptools_ingles.html (timeout 10 seconds)
UpTools-devel.i686: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/UpTools-8.5.4/tests/testUpTimer.cc
The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in
the specfile's %prep section for example using iconv(1).
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
UpTools-static.i686: I: checking
UpTools-static.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) hpc - hp, pc, hic
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
UpTools-static.i686: I: checking-url
http://www.palermo.edu/ingenieria/uptools_ingles.html (timeout 10 seconds)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
UpTools-debuginfo.i686: I: checking
UpTools-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url
http://www.palermo.edu/ingenieria/uptools_ingles.html (timeout 10 seconds)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664826] Review Request: lucene3 - High-performance, full-featured text search engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664826 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||socho...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|socho...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2011-01-31 08:55:42 EST --- I'll do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674060] New: Review Request: rubygem-deltacloud-core - Deltacloud REST API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-deltacloud-core - Deltacloud REST API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674060 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-deltacloud-core - Deltacloud REST API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mfoj...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mifo.sk/RPMS/rubygem-deltacloud-core.spec SRPM URL: http://mifo.sk/RPMS/rubygem-deltacloud-core-0.2.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: The Deltacloud API is built as a service-based REST API. You do not directly link a Deltacloud library into your program to use it. Instead, a client speaks the Deltacloud API over HTTP to a server which implements the REST interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 651898] Review Request: rubygem-activemodel - A toolkit for building modeling frameworks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651898 --- Comment #7 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-01-31 09:17:29 EST --- Updates package files: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-activemodel.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-activemodel-3.0.3-2.fc14.src.rpm I have added the dependencies (mocha was the one which was missing to pass the test suite) and updated the test suite execution command to require rubygems, therefore no patching is necessary. The rubygems are later required internally anyway. I have tested in mock for F14 and Rawhide. See the attached activemodel-mock.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 651898] Review Request: rubygem-activemodel - A toolkit for building modeling frameworks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651898 --- Comment #6 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-01-31 09:17:07 EST --- Created attachment 476194 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=476194 ActiveModel mock build output -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674060] Review Request: rubygem-deltacloud-core - Deltacloud REST API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674060
--- Comment #1 from Michal Fojtik mfoj...@redhat.com 2011-01-31 09:21:44 EST
---
rpmlint:
rubygem-deltacloud-core.noarch: W: no-documentation
- There is a -doc subpackage
rubygem-deltacloud-core.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary deltacloudd
- Non blocker (?)
rubygem-deltacloud-core.noarch: W: incoherent-init-script-name deltacloud-core
('rubygem-deltacloud-core', 'rubygem-deltacloud-cored')
- Well, I think for user it's better to keep 'gemname' as a init script name
to avoid confusion. I think there are two options, first to keep name of this
package (rubygem-deltacloud-core) and keep init script name as it is, or second
to rename whole package to 'deltacloud-core'. What do you think ?
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673784] Rename Request: mingw32-filesystem - cross-filesystem - Cross compiler base filesystem and environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673784 Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@cchtml.com --- Comment #9 from Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com 2011-01-31 09:33:44 EST --- (In reply to comment #8) I disagree - It would have been the appropriate choice. Why is it if you didn't create it, Ralf, you always disagree? cross-* is the /start/ of the cross compiler project. Eric/Richard are starting the cross compiler project with only MinGW, but with the plan to expand to OS X and whatever other cross compiling. In your mind, Ralf, Eric/Richard need to keep the cross compiler package names split?? THAT doesn't make any sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663244] Review Request: CUnit - A unit testing framework for C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663244 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663244] Review Request: CUnit - A unit testing framework for C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663244 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-31 09:43:09 EST --- CUnit-2.1.2-6.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/CUnit-2.1.2-6.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663244] Review Request: CUnit - A unit testing framework for C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663244 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-31 09:43:01 EST --- CUnit-2.1.2-6.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/CUnit-2.1.2-6.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672845] Review Request: rubygem-net-ping-1.3.7-1.fc14.src.rpm - Net::Ping rubygem library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672845 --- Comment #1 from Lukáš Zapletal l...@redhat.com 2011-01-31 10:05:41 EST --- Fixing several problems reported by mfojtik from Red Hat. Thanks. # rpmlint rubygem-net-ping-1.3.7-1.fc14.src.rpm rubygem-net-ping.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # rpmlint rubygem-net-ping-1.3.7-1.fc14.noarch.rpm rubygem-net-ping.noarch: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US rubygem-net-ping.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/net-ping-1.3.7/ri/Net/Ping/TCP/ping%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-net-ping.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/net-ping-1.3.7/ri/Net/Ping/HTTP/ping%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-net-ping.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/net-ping-1.3.7/ri/Net/Ping/WMI/ping%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-net-ping.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/net-ping-1.3.7/ri/Net/Ping/UDP/service_check%3d-c.yaml %3d rubygem-net-ping.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/net-ping-1.3.7/ri/Net/Ping/ping%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-net-ping.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/net-ping-1.3.7/ri/Net/Ping/ICMP/ping%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-net-ping.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/net-ping-1.3.7/ri/Net/Ping/TCP/service_check%3d-c.yaml %3d rubygem-net-ping.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/net-ping-1.3.7/ri/Net/Ping/External/ping%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-net-ping.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/net-ping-1.3.7/ri/Net/Ping/UDP/data%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-net-ping.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/net-ping-1.3.7/ri/Net/Ping/ICMP/data_size%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-net-ping.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/net-ping-1.3.7/ri/Net/Ping/UDP/ping%3f-i.yaml %3f 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings. Overwriting the original SPEC/SRPM files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668820] Review Request: rubygem-rdoc - RDoc produces HTML and command-line documentation for Ruby projects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668820 Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||vondr...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-01-31 10:09:27 EST --- Taking this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||richmat...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com 2011-01-31 10:26:33 EST --- It looks like this package is currently using 3 bundled libraries: flann, convexdecomposition, and collada. Flann is up for review right now in bug 672440. The collada stuff appears to be collada-dom on sourceforge. And I'm having a hard time tracking down where the convexdecomposition library came from. It's possible to get around shipping bundled libraries under the right circumstances by filing an exception with FESCo: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries The end of line encoding is easy to fix with sed or dos2unix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674082] New: Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082 Summary: Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fed...@matbooth.co.uk QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mchange-commons.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mchange-commons-0.2-0.2.20110130hg.fc14.src.rpm Description: Originally part of c3p0, mchange-commons is a set of general purpose utilities. Rpmlint output: mchange-commons.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. (This project doesn't ship anything you can call documentation.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674080] New: Review Request: rubygem-acts_as_audited - Ruby extension logging all changes to your models in an audits table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-acts_as_audited - Ruby extension logging all changes to your models in an audits table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674080 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-acts_as_audited - Ruby extension logging all changes to your models in an audits table Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: l...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://static.zapletalovi.com/fedora/rpm/rubygem-acts_as_audited/1.1.1-1/rubygem-acts_as_audited.spec SRPM URL: http://static.zapletalovi.com/fedora/rpm/rubygem-acts_as_audited/1.1.1-1/rubygem-acts_as_audited-1.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: ActiveRecord extension that logs all changes to your models in an audits table # rpmlint rubygem-acts_as_audited-1.1.1-1.fc14.src.rpm rubygem-acts_as_audited.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US rubygem-acts_as_audited.src: W: no-%prep-section rubygem-acts_as_audited.src: W: no-%build-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. # rpmlint rubygem-acts_as_audited-1.1.1-1.fc14.noarch.rpm rubygem-acts_as_audited.noarch: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672951] Review Request: python26-elixir - A declarative mapper for SQLAlchemy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672951 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey Ness jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com 2011-01-31 10:44:54 EST --- This package is for Python26 which is available from EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akurt...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-01-31 10:48:14 EST --- Is there a reason to not have javadoc subpackage? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674085] New: Review Request: rubygem-virt - Simplied interface to use ruby the libvirt library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-virt - Simplied interface to use ruby the libvirt library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674085 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-virt - Simplied interface to use ruby the libvirt library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: l...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://static.zapletalovi.com/fedora/rpm/rubygem-virt/0.1.0-1/rubygem-virt.spec SRPM URL: http://static.zapletalovi.com/fedora/rpm/rubygem-virt/0.1.0-1/rubygem-virt-0.1.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Simplied interface to use ruby the libvirt ruby library # rpmlint rubygem-virt-0.1.0-1.fc14.src.rpm rubygem-virt.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US rubygem-virt.src: W: no-%prep-section rubygem-virt.src: W: no-%build-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. # rpmlint rubygem-virt-0.1.0-1.fc14.noarch.rpm rubygem-virt.noarch: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US rubygem-virt.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/virt-0.1.0/ri/Virt/Volume/new%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-virt.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/virt-0.1.0/ri/Virt/Interface/new%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-virt.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/virt-0.1.0/ri/Virt/Pool/new%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-virt.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/virt-0.1.0/ri/Virt/Connection/closed%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-virt.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/virt-0.1.0/ri/Virt/Connection/secure%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-virt.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/virt-0.1.0/ri/Virt/Guest/new%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-virt.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/virt-0.1.0/ri/Virt/Guest/running%3f-i.yaml %3f 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590305] Review Request: vile - VI Like Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590305 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-31 10:53:48 EST --- vile-9.8d-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update vile'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vile-9.8d-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672440] Review Request: flann - Fast Library for Approximate Nearest Neighbors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672440 Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||t...@niemueller.de AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|t...@niemueller.de --- Comment #1 from Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de 2011-01-31 10:56:36 EST --- Ok, I'm taking this review. Before even looking, can you patch out the call to exit meaningful before upstream reacts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672440] Review Request: flann - Fast Library for Approximate Nearest Neighbors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672440 Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 664826] Review Request: lucene3 - High-performance, full-featured text search engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664826
--- Comment #2 from Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com 2011-01-31
10:54:27 EST ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[!] Rpmlint output:
lucene3.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided lucene-devel
lucene3-javadoc.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm
lucene3-javadoc.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun rm
We no longer provide javadocs/jars with versions. Please remove those
scriptlets.
lucene3-demo.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Lucene - Lucerne, Luce
ne, Luce-ne
lucene3-demo.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Lucene - Lucerne,
Luce ne, Luce-ne
lucene3-demo.noarch: W: no-documentation
lucene3-contrib.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Lucene - Lucerne,
Luce ne, Luce-ne
lucene3-contrib.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Lucene -
Lucerne, Luce ne, Luce-ne
lucene3-contrib.noarch: W: no-documentation
lucene3-contrib.noarch: W: class-path-in-manifest
/usr/share/java/lucene3-contrib/lucene3-lucli-3.0.3.jar
This can be fixed same way lucene-2.x manifest is fixed
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings.
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[!] Buildroot definition is not present
Please get rid of it
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: ASL 2.0
[!] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
Main package should also include NOTICE.txt
[!] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
Javadoc subpackage doesn't include LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package: c8655fe90d2303ff69e3b570662db8bb
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[!] Permissions on files are set properly.
Please use default (-,root,root,-) unless you have good reason not to
[!] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
No clean section, no rm -rf at the beginning of %install
[x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[!] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
Current packaging guidelines require versionless jars/javadocs
[!] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
You are missing Requires
[!] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
Javadoc subpackage doesn't have jpackage-utils in Requires
[-] Package uses %global not %define
[-] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[x] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[!] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
No versions in jar filenames
[-] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[-] pom files has correct add_to_maven_depmap call which resolves to the pom
file (use JPP. and JPP- correctly)
=== Other suggestions ===
[x] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: rawhide-i386
=== Issues ===
1. Besides things already mentioned, your %prep includes few seds that should
be commented.
2. Tests are not executed (copied comment from lucene 2.x?)
3. There are
[Bug 542436] Review Request: python-cloudfiles - Python language bindings for Rackspace CloudFiles API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542436 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||methe...@gmail.com --- Comment #12 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2011-01-31 11:07:33 EST --- You should probably open up a new review request instead of reopening a old new since the reports counting reviews processes will get confused otherwise and you shouldn't assign the review request to yourself. Some preliminary notes * Should document why you are using the git version instead of the release in the spec file * Should document the patch and their upstream status * No need to define the buildroot or have a clean section unless you are branching for EPEL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 672440] Review Request: flann - Fast Library for Approximate Nearest Neighbors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672440 --- Comment #2 from Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com 2011-01-31 11:08:25 EST --- I emailed the upstream developer about the LICENSE text and the exit(0) problems. He replied very quickly, and said that he has removed the call to exit(0) in SVN for the next release. It doesn't look like he's using a public SVN, but I should be able to dig in and fix things later tonight. He also said he would include a BSD LICENSE text in his next release, in case you stumble upon the fact that it's missing while you're reviewing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082 --- Comment #2 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2011-01-31 11:13:19 EST --- Not especially, just the ant script doesn't build them. c3p0 will probably be the only package that will be using this mchange-commons, do you think it's worth me patching the build? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674082] Review Request: mchange-commons - A collection of general purpose utilities for c3p0
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674082 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-01-31 11:17:35 EST --- It's worth it at least for consistency sake. Our users are/should expect a javadoc subpackage to exist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673784] Rename Request: mingw32-filesystem - cross-filesystem - Cross compiler base filesystem and environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673784 --- Comment #10 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2011-01-31 11:32:25 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) (In reply to comment #8) I disagree - It would have been the appropriate choice. Why is it if you didn't create it, ... because I don't see any sense in such a package. ... and because I have a cross compiler infrastructure package of my own, [rude as-hominem offense delete] cross-* is the /start/ of the cross compiler project. It's some people's cross-compiler project - Not mine. In your mind, Ralf, Eric/Richard need to keep the cross compiler package names split?? They can call their package by what ever name they want, but calling a package cross-filesystem, which doesn't do what it claims, is not useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673784] Rename Request: mingw32-filesystem - cross-filesystem - Cross compiler base filesystem and environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673784 --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2011-01-31 11:36:31 EST --- OK, but I don't think crossdesktop-* is going to offend anyone's sensibilities. It reflects what we are doing: offering a cross compiler that targets the most popular desktop systems out there today (where most popular is measured by market share, and desktop doesn't include embedded/mobile systems). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
