[Bug 675649] New: Review Request: perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Dispatch - Log::Any::Adapter::Dispatch Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Dispatch - Log::Any::Adapter::Dispatch Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675649 Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Dispatch - Log::Any::Adapter::Dispatch Perl module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040...@freenet.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Dispatch.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Dispatch- 0.06-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: This Log::Any adapter uses Log::Dispatch for logging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675649] Review Request: perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Dispatch - Log::Any::Adapter::Dispatch Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675649 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||675646 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675646] Review Request: perl-Log-Any-Adapter - Tell Log::Any where to send its logs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675646 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||675649 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675646] New: Review Request: perl-Log-Any-Adapter - Tell Log::Any where to send its logs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Any-Adapter - Tell Log::Any where to send its logs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675646 Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Any-Adapter - Tell Log::Any where to send its logs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040...@freenet.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Log-Any-Adapter.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Log-Any-Adapter-0.03-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: The Log-Any-Adapter distribution implements Log::Any class methods to specify where logs should be sent. It is a separate distribution so as to keep Log::Any itself as simple and unchanging as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 667954] Review Request: rubygem-arel - Arel is a Relational Algebra for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667954 Bug 667954 depends on bug 674587, which changed state. Bug 674587 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-sqlite3 - Allows Ruby scripts to interface with a SQLite3 database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674587 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674587] Review Request: rubygem-sqlite3 - Allows Ruby scripts to interface with a SQLite3 database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674587 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-02-07 00:29:41 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615669] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Cracklib - perl module to interact with libcrack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615669 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-06 23:20:45 EST --- perl-Crypt-Cracklib-1.7-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-Cracklib-1.7-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615669] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Cracklib - perl module to interact with libcrack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615669 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-06 23:17:59 EST --- perl-Crypt-Cracklib-1.7-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-Cracklib-1.7-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630282] Review Request: ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl - Monad-transformer for Control.Exception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282 --- Comment #7 from Shakthi Kannan 2011-02-06 22:00:43 EST --- Upstream has updated license to BSD3 with a new release 0.3.0.2. Can you please update your .spec file and make a new package release? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674674] Review Request: python-zope-configuration - Zope Configuration Markup Language (ZCML)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674674 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-06 21:49:49 EST --- python-zope-configuration-3.7.2-1.fc14,python-zope-deprecation-3.4.0-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-zope-configuration-3.7.2-1.fc14,python-zope-deprecation-3.4.0-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674674] Review Request: python-zope-configuration - Zope Configuration Markup Language (ZCML)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674674 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-06 21:49:42 EST --- python-zope-configuration-3.7.2-1.fc13,python-zope-deprecation-3.4.0-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-zope-configuration-3.7.2-1.fc13,python-zope-deprecation-3.4.0-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674674] Review Request: python-zope-configuration - Zope Configuration Markup Language (ZCML)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674674 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666726] Review Request: amide - A Medical Image Data Examiner:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726 Susmit changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-02-06 21:45:31 --- Comment #15 from Susmit 2011-02-06 21:45:31 EST --- Thank you very much. It has been pushed to koji. CLosing as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615669] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Cracklib - perl module to interact with libcrack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615669 --- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi 2011-02-06 21:39:02 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615669] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Cracklib - perl module to interact with libcrack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615669 Carl Thompson changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 615669] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Cracklib - perl module to interact with libcrack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615669 --- Comment #24 from Carl Thompson 2011-02-06 21:17:52 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Crypt-Cracklib New Branches: EPEL5 EPEL6 Owners: redragon InitialCC: redragon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951 --- Comment #18 from Nerijus Baliunas 2011-02-06 21:04:50 EST --- Regarding error in Comment 12 - it seems it tries to compile in wine-mozilla/media/libtheora/lib/dec/x86_vc directory, which is for Visual C, while it should probably compile in wine-mozilla/media/libtheora/lib/dec/x86. Am I right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675628] Review Request: python26-jinja2 - General purpose template engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675628 Thomas Moschny changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |python26-jinja - General|python26-jinja2 - General |purpose template engine |purpose template engine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675628] Review Request: python26-jinja - General purpose template engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675628 Thomas Moschny changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||662743 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675628] New: Review Request: python26-jinja - General purpose template engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python26-jinja - General purpose template engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675628 Summary: Review Request: python26-jinja - General purpose template engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas.mosc...@gmx.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python26-jinja2/python26-jinja2.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python26-jinja2/python26-jinja2-2.5.5-4.fc14.src.rpm Description: Jinja2 is a template engine written in pure Python. It provides a Django inspired non-XML syntax but supports inline expressions and an optional sandboxed environment. If you have any exposure to other text-based template languages, such as Smarty or Django, you should feel right at home with Jinja2. It's both designer and developer friendly by sticking to Python's principles and adding functionality useful for templating environments. Note: This is an EPEL5 only package for python26. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623606] Review Request: gxneur - GTK front-end for X Neural Switcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623606 --- Comment #17 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2011-02-06 18:53:31 EST --- Thank you, Kevin. gxneur built in rawhide. I can't now build for Fedora 13 and 14 because there no enought version of xneur. It still in testing. So, waiting week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-06 18:41:52 EST --- ne7ssh-1.3.2-10.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ne7ssh-1.3.2-10.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-06 18:41:24 EST --- ne7ssh-1.3.2-10.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ne7ssh-1.3.2-10.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-06 18:42:17 EST --- ne7ssh-1.3.2-10.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ne7ssh-1.3.2-10.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674180] Review Request: knights - A chess board for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
--- Comment #2 from Golo Fuchert 2011-02-06 18:09:35 EST
---
Here are some initial comments/questions before the review.
- I think the homepage in your spec file is wrong. It seems that there was a
rewrite of Knights and your sources are provided by
http://opendesktop.org/content/show.php?content=122046
- You might want to consider to use macros like %{name} in the Source0 tag,
too. This will save you some work later on!
- The headers of the source files state:
"GNU General Public License [...]; either version 2 of
the License or (at your option) version 3 or any later version
accepted by the membership of KDE e.V."
so GPLv3+ is somehow an oversimplification, isn't it?
- Concerning Licensing: The source file contains no file containing the license
text (e.g. COPYING), it is best to ask upstream to change this.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
- Why are you not using make %{?_smp_mflags} ? Did I miss something?
Beside of that I think the package is ready for the review.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623606] Review Request: gxneur - GTK front-end for X Neural Switcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623606 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2011-02-06 18:01:58 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674674] Review Request: python-zope-configuration - Zope Configuration Markup Language (ZCML)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674674 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2011-02-06 17:55:30 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674587] Review Request: rubygem-sqlite3 - Allows Ruby scripts to interface with a SQLite3 database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674587 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2011-02-06 17:54:43 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674676] Review Request: python-zope-deprecation - Zope 3 Deprecation Infrastructure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674676 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2011-02-06 17:55:54 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674929] Review Request: sh-elf-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at sh-elf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674929 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2011-02-06 17:56:26 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673485] Review Request: libldb - A schema-less, ldap like, API and database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673485 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2011-02-06 17:54:22 EST --- undepreciated the existing orphaned devel branch and made you owner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666222] Review Request: python-speaklater - implements a lazy string for python useful for use with gettext
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666222 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2011-02-06 17:49:51 EST --- WARNING: "haks" is not a valid FAS account. Can you work with your sponsor to get your account setup, then reset the fedora-cvs flag? thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 666726] Review Request: amide - A Medical Image Data Examiner:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2011-02-06 17:50:41 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Sorry on the case sensitive fields. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623606] Review Request: gxneur - GTK front-end for X Neural Switcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623606 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2011-02-06 17:47:24 EST --- (In reply to comment #14) > If gxneur actually does require the corresponding xneur (the complete package > and not just the library it was linked against), this should be mentioned > somewhere in the docs. Good catch. I'll mention it. And yes it requires not only library! Instead it just provide GUI to change config file and then restart xneur daemon. Again thank you for the review. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gxneur Short Description: GTK front-end for X Neural Switcher Owners: hubbitus Branches: F-13 F-14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646610] Rename review: drupal-views -> drupal6-views
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646610 --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2011-02-06 17:47:08 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). PS: Could you stick to the normal format of summary for reviews? Anything else shows up as a flag in the processing script and also makes it harder to find this review later... ie: Review Request: drupal6-views - whatever Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598688] Review Request: archivemount - FUSE based filesystem for mounting compressed archives
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598688 --- Comment #28 from Kevin Fenzi 2011-02-06 17:44:30 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 611048] Review Request: python-amqplib - Client library for AMQP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611048 --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2011-02-06 17:45:06 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646611] Rename review: drupal-cck -> drupal6-cck
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646611 --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi 2011-02-06 17:48:23 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). PS: Could you stick to the normal format of summary for reviews? Anything else shows up as a flag in the processing script and also makes it harder to find this review later... ie: Review Request: drupal6-whatever - whatever -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #42 from Kevin Fenzi 2011-02-06 17:43:45 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 204694] Review Request: zvbi - Raw VBI, Teletext and Closed Caption decoding library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204694 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2011-02-06 17:39:30 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 176253] Review Request: clement - An application to filter and manage E-mail traffic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 --- Comment #33 from Kevin Fenzi 2011-02-06 17:38:48 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630754] Review Request: mscgen - Message Sequence Chart Rendering tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630754 --- Comment #12 from Michael McTernan 2011-02-06 16:45:10 EST --- I've looked at other packages to see how they fit together, particularly gd2. I take your point though; I'll see if I can usefully comment on some other packages up for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565232] Review Request: perl-Log-Any - Bringing loggers and listeners together
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565232 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-06 16:19:40 EST --- perl-Log-Any-0.11-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Log-Any-0.11-2.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675478] Review Request: gprbuild - Ada project builder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675478 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Zhukov 2011-02-06 16:22:57 EST --- Spec URL: http://landgraf.fedorapeople.org/packages/requested/gprbuild/gprbuild.spec SRPM URL: http://landgraf.fedorapeople.org/packages/requested/gprbuild/gprbuild-2010-3.fc14.src.rpm new build (fixed gcc regexp for non-English gcc -v output) -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 565232] Review Request: perl-Log-Any - Bringing loggers and listeners together
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565232 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-06 16:19:33 EST --- perl-Log-Any-0.11-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Log-Any-0.11-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 625592] Review Request: PyCAM -Open Source CAM - Toolpath Generation for 3-Axis CNC machining
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625592
Dominic Hopf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Dominic Hopf 2011-02-06 16:16:52
EST ---
% rpmlint pycam.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
% rpmlint pycam-0.3-3.fc13.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
% rpmlint /home/dmaphy/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/pycam-0.3-3.fc14.noarch.rpm
pycam.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pycam
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
There actually is a manpage, but it is not installed.
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
[x] Specfile name matches %{name}.spec
[x] Package seems to meet Packaging Guidelines
[-] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one
supported architecture.
This is a noarch package.
[x] Rpmlint output:
source RPM: empty
binary RPM: man page not installed, see above.
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] License in specfile matches actual License and meets Licensing Guidelines
License: GPLv3+
Just to mention: There is an SVG file claiming to be Creative Commons.
[X] License file is included in %doc.
[x] Specfile is legible and written in AE
[x] Sourcefile in the Package is the same as provided in the mentioned Source
SHA1SUM of Source: 1c5135c2c531574013f3491884607512f44f7e5c
[x] Package compiles successfully
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires
[-] Specfile handles locales properly
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required
[x] Package owns directorys it creates
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not list a file more than once in the %files listing
[x] %files section includes %defattr and permissions are set properly
[x] %clean section is there and contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x] Macros are consistently used
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage
[x] Program runs properly without files listed in %doc
[-] Header files are in a -devel package
[-] Static libraries are in a -static package
[-] Package requires pkgconfig if .pc files are present
[-] .so-files are put into a -devel subpackage
[-] Subpackages include fully versioned dependency for the base package
[-] Any libtool archives (*.la) are removed
[x] contains desktop file (%{name}.desktop) if it is a GUI application
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is removed at beginning of %install
[-] Filenames are encoded in UTF-8
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Package contains latest upstream version
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] non-English translations for description and summary
[x] Package builds in mock
Tested on: F14/x86_64
[x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported
architectures.
tested build with koji
[x] Program runs
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] pkgconfig (*.pc) files are placed in a -devel package
[-] require package providing a file instead of the file itself
no files outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin are required
I think the additional source file for the desktop can be removed, since the
pycam-0.3 tarball delivers exactly the same file. You also should fix the man
page issue. Anything else looks good so far and the package is APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675402] Review Request: qpass - password manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675402
--- Comment #4 from Golo Fuchert 2011-02-06 16:10:04 EST
---
Please include %{_datadir}/%{name}/ in the %files section. Read my post above.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675588] New: Review Request: pycmd - Tools for managing/searching Python related files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pycmd - Tools for managing/searching Python related files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675588 Summary: Review Request: pycmd - Tools for managing/searching Python related files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas.mosc...@gmx.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/pycmd/pycmd.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/pycmd/pycmd-1.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Pycmd is a collection of command line tools for helping with Python development. Notes: - pycmd was part of pylib (python-py) until python-py-1.3.4, and is no longer included starting with python-py-1.4.0. - It has a BR on the newer pylib (python-py), which has not been updated in rawhide yet because of a circular dependency to pytest (see bug 675587), but can be found here: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-py/ . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675587] New: Review Request: pytest - Simple powerful testing with Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pytest - Simple powerful testing with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675587 Summary: Review Request: pytest - Simple powerful testing with Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas.mosc...@gmx.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/pytest/pytest.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/pytest/pytest-2.0.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: py.test provides simple, yet powerful testing for Python. Notes: - pytest was part of pylib (python-py) until python-py-1.3.4, and is no longer included starting with python-py-1.4.0. - It has a BR on the newer pylib (python-py), which has not been updated in rawhide yet because of a circular dependency to pytest, but can be found here: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-py/ . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 623606] Review Request: gxneur - GTK front-end for X Neural Switcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623606
Martin Gieseking changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+
--- Comment #14 from Martin Gieseking 2011-02-06
16:00:22 EST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Martin, thank you very much for the review! Can I make response review for
> you?
You're welcome, and thanks for the offer. However, I currently don't have any
packages in the queue waiting for a reviewer.
> (In reply to comment #12)
> build fix and is not so important. But previous svn build (it in changelog of
> xneur if you want see) was to fix error what I ask upstream author. So, full
> version dependency should be used to pull correct version!
If gxneur actually does require the corresponding xneur (the complete package
and not just the library it was linked against), this should be mentioned
somewhere in the docs. Also, the build system should check whether the proper
version is present. Maybe you can ask upstream to add this.
As requested by the guidelines, you should also add a comment above Requires:
xneur = %{version} why this explicit dependency is necessary.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ExplicitRequires
Package APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675402] Review Request: qpass - password manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675402
Martin Gieseking changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de
--- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2011-02-06
15:29:17 EST ---
Here are a couple of further notes:
- Please drop "Requires: qt, libgcrypt". Both dependencies are detected
automatically.
- Don't mix spaces and tabs for indentation. Choose one of them and stick with
it.
- Replace Group "Application/Internet" with "Applications/Internet"
- Add the missing buildroot dir to the location of the desktop file:
desktop-file-validate $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/qpass.desktop
- You should install file COPYING into %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/.
One way to do that is to remove the installed file from the buildroot and add
it with %doc in section %files:
in %install: rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}/COPYING
in %files: replace %{_datadir}/%{name}/COPYING with %doc COPYING
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 662301] Review Request: plotdrop - A minimal GNOME front-end to Gnuplot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662301 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-06 15:20:55 EST --- plotdrop-0.5.3-5.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update plotdrop'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/plotdrop-0.5.3-5.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674188] Review Request: libzeitgeist - Library to access zeitgeist; needed by synapse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674188 --- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt 2011-02-06 15:08:14 EST --- %doc and %docdir compete with eachother. It's as follows: %doc /some/file includes /some/file in the package and marks it as documentation. %docdir /some/path/ /some/path/file1 /some/path/file2 /some/path/file3 can save you a few %doc attributes. It is equivalent to: %doc /some/path/file1 %doc /some/path/file2 %doc /some/path/file3 However, it does not include a directory entry for /some/path (rpm -qlpv would not show the ^d entry for /some/path). You would need to include the directory separately. There is the much shorter form %doc /some/path/ which includes the directory /some/path and additionally marks every file in it as documentation. It is equivalent to: %dir /some/path/ %doc /some/path/* However, it also doesn't mark the directory /some/path as %doc, just all ordinary files in it. So, in %docdir /some/path/ %doc /some/path/ the %docdir line is superfluous. Using %docdir can be helpful, if you don't include a full tree of files, but specific file names as above in the file1, file2, file3 case (where the build of an update would break if files are missing). Of course, you can mark each file %doc instead and achieve the same thing. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674188] Review Request: libzeitgeist - Library to access zeitgeist; needed by synapse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674188
--- Comment #6 from Renich Bon Ciric 2011-02-06
14:29:46 EST ---
Thank you, very much, for taking the time to guide me through this.
(In reply to comment #5)
> As I've pointed out before, the %docdir entry in your %files section does not
> do what you probably think it does. Directories are not marked as %doc, so a
> single entry
>
> %doc %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/zeitgeist-1.0/
>
> would be enough to include that directory *and* everything it it.
Ok; I understand. I read here:
http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-files-list-directives.html#S3-RPM-INSIDE-DOCDIR-DIRECTIVE
That docdir would mark the directory as a doc dir so to include the files
inside it. I may have gotten confused by the definition or, maybe, in Fedora it
doesn't work that way?
> > %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING COPYING.GPL INSTALL MAINTAINERS NEWS README
>
> Here 'INSTALL' can still be dropped.
Ok, done!
Please, if in the mood, check it out again at:
http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/libzeitgeist.spec
http://renich.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/libzeitgeist-0.3.2-3.fc14.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 641261] Review Request: openerp-server - Open Source ERP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641261 Alec Leamas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||leamas.a...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Alec Leamas 2011-02-06 14:15:30 EST --- Hm... I don't know if it's bad manners to hijack a tread like this... but I happen to have an updated spec file which possibly can be of interest. Please let me know if this the wrong way to handle it. Anyway, updated spec files for F14/6.01. I have updated versions also for web and GTK client, but I wait until I get some kind of response on this one. Spec: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17870887/openerp-server.spec RPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17870887/openerp-server-6.0.1-1.fc14.src.rpm PS: version 3344 of is actually worse than the released 6.0.1, but I guess there will be better versions before this review process comes to an end. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675478] Review Request: gprbuild - Ada project builder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675478 Pavel Zhukov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se --- Comment #2 from Pavel Zhukov 2011-02-06 11:49:15 EST --- -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675557] Review Request: matreshka - set of Ada libraries to help to develop information systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675557 Pavel Zhukov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se --- Comment #2 from Pavel Zhukov 2011-02-06 11:49:41 EST --- -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675388] Review Request: xmlada - full XML stack for Ada
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675388 Pavel Zhukov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se --- Comment #3 from Pavel Zhukov 2011-02-06 11:48:34 EST --- -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675557] New: Review Request: matreshka - set of Ada libraries to help to develop information systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: matreshka - set of Ada libraries to help to develop information systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675557 Summary: Review Request: matreshka - set of Ada libraries to help to develop information systems Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pa...@zhukoff.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://landgraf.fedorapeople.org/packages/requested/matreshka/matreshka.spec SRPM URL: http://landgraf.fedorapeople.org/packages/requested/matreshka/matreshka-0.0.6-1.fc14.src.rpm Just for attention: this is the first attempt of contribution matreshka. Description: * League --- provides support for localization, internationalization and globalization; including: o unbounded form of string of Unicode characters; cursors to iterate other characters and grapheme clusters; advanced locale tailored operations such as case conversion, case folding, collation, normalization; o regular expression engine with Perl-style syntax and Unicode extensions; o text codec to convert data streams into/from internal representation; o message translator to translate messages into natural language which is selected by user; o access to command line arguments and environment variables as Unicode encoded strings. * XML processor --- provides capability to manipulate with XML streams ans documents; including: o SAX reader to read XML streams and documents; it supports both XML1.0/XML1.1 specifications as well as corresponding Namespaces in XML specifications; o SAX writer to generate XML streams and documents from application. * Web framework o FastCGI module allows to develop server side applications completely in Ada and use them with standard HTTP servers ( demo). Large number of specifications are used and are supported, see Conformance for complete information about conformance to specifications. Koji build is unavailable (Please see depends) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675478] Review Request: gprbuild - Ada project builder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675478 Pavel Zhukov changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||675557 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675557] Review Request: matreshka - set of Ada libraries to help to develop information systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675557 Pavel Zhukov changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||675478 --- Comment #1 from Pavel Zhukov 2011-02-06 11:05:48 EST --- Add depend -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674673] Review Request: lovelock-backgrounds - Lovelock desktop backgrounds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674673 Martin Sourada changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-02-06 10:13:09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675542] Review Request:perl-Hash-MoreUtils - Provide the stuff missing in Hash::Util
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675542 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||675529 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675529] Review Request: perl-Test-CheckManifest - Check if your Manifest matches your distro
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675529 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||675542 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675542] New: Review Request:perl-Hash-MoreUtils - Provide the stuff missing in Hash::Util
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:perl-Hash-MoreUtils - Provide the stuff missing in Hash::Util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675542 Summary: Review Request:perl-Hash-MoreUtils - Provide the stuff missing in Hash::Util Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040...@freenet.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Hash-MoreUtils.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Hash-MoreUtils-0.02-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Similar to List::MoreUtils, Hash::MoreUtils contains trivial but commonly- used functionality for hashes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675495] Review Request: parallel - Shell tool for executing jobs in parallel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675495 --- Comment #3 from Ville Skyttä 2011-02-06 07:34:49 EST --- The only sane two options I can think of right now are either to wait upstreams to resolve the issue, or to ship GNU parallel with the executable, man page and references to the executable in the man page renamed to something. If renaming, I suggest gparallel because that's already done in the wild to some extent (see below), and many GNU utilities have the g prefix anyway to distinguish them from other similar tools with the same name. I did some research what other distributions do: Gentoo takes the gparallel approach: http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-process/parallel/parallel-20110122.ebuild?revision=1.1&view=markup FreeBSD splits parallel from moreutils into moreutils-parallel: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/parallel/Makefile?rev=1.8 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/moreutils-parallel/Makefile?rev=1.1 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152973 Debian, Ubuntu, Mandriva and openSUSE don't seem to have GNU parallel packages available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675495] Review Request: parallel - Shell tool for executing jobs in parallel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675495 --- Comment #2 from Golo Fuchert 2011-02-06 06:41:29 EST --- Thanks for the feedback, obviously I missed that package. However, according to [1] it is not the same program. Since both upstream projects seem to be aware of the "confusion" [1,2] already, I wouldn't expect that they will change the naming right now. I will contact both projects for the latest status. If they refuse, is there anything that can be done other than waiting? Thank you! [1] http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/history.html [2] http://kitenet.net/~joey/code/moreutils/discussion/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675529] New: Review Request: perl-Test-CheckManifest - Check if your Manifest matches your distro
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-CheckManifest - Check if your Manifest matches your distro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675529 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-CheckManifest - Check if your Manifest matches your distro Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040...@freenet.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-CheckManifest.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-CheckManifest-1.22-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Check if your Manifest matches your distro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 577951] Review Request: mingw32-wine-gecko - MinGW Gecko library required for Wine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577951 Andreas Bierfert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xose.vazq...@gmail.com --- Comment #17 from Andreas Bierfert 2011-02-06 05:36:44 EST --- *** Bug 675422 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675495] Review Request: parallel - Shell tool for executing jobs in parallel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675495 Ville Skyttä changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fed...@marcbradshaw.co.uk, ||ville.sky...@iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Ville Skyttä 2011-02-06 04:22:42 EST --- This would conflict with moreutils: $ repoquery -f /usr/bin/parallel moreutils-0:0.40-1.fc14.x86_64 See "Binary name conflicts" and "Approaching upstream" at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts /usr/bin/parallel was added in moreutils 0.36, July 2009 according to debian/changelog in its tarball. The oldest GNU parallel release tarball I could find is 20100424 (that's when I gather it became official GNU software) but the first commit in Savannah git for it is from 2007-09-10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
