[Bug 691189] Review Request: wmbinclock - Dockapp which shows the actual system time as binary clock
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691189 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2011-05-09 01:56:30 EDT --- + source files match upstream. ba268e66b59b100edb9da1cee064c258 wmbinclock-0.5.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + license field matches the actual license. GPLv2+ + license is open source-compatible. + license text included. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + package builds in mock (locally) + package installs properly. + rpmlint has no meaningful complaints: wmbinclock.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Dockapp - Dock app, Dock-app, Paddock wmbinclock.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found de wmbinclock.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Dockapp - Dock app, Dock-app, Paddock wmbinclock.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Dockapp - Dock app, Dock-app, Paddock wmbinclock.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Dockapp - Dock app, Dock-app, Paddock wmbinclock.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/wmbinclock-0.5/COPYING wmbinclock.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary wmBinClock wmbinclock-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/wmbinclock-0.5/wmBinClock_mask.xbm wmbinclock-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/wmbinclock-0.5/wmBinClock.c 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 5 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. Again, you should advise upstream of the fsf address change and ask them to update their code. Would also be nice to get a man page too. Otherwise, all appears okay. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701284] Review Request: python-py2pack - Generate distribution packages from Python packages on PyPI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701284 --- Comment #3 from Jerome Soyer sai...@gmail.com 2011-05-09 02:49:36 EDT --- Hi, First, thanks for the review, i will correct with your hints. For Python 3 support, the module don't support it upstream, i just added things in the spec for further release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 699205] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy - Convert or render graphs as ASCII, HTML, SVG or via Graphviz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699205 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2011-05-09 02:54:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Just a spelling error. But in my mind, layouter is a common spelling, too. Could be kept as is. I think the dictionaries haven't caught up with the usage yet. It's a derivative noun formed by extending layout with -er suffix, meaning one who or that which deals with layouts. (From the verb to lay out, you would end up with layer-out, definitely not lay-outer). I'm not sure at all if examples in %doc should be followed by a / to let the package own the whole folder including its contents. rpm -ql shows that the resulting rpm already owns both the directory and its contents. A trailing slash isn't necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670345] Review Request: cx_freeze - create executable from python scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670345 --- Comment #20 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr 2011-05-09 03:20:20 EDT --- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670345] Review Request: cx_freeze - create executable from python scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670345 Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(meta...@gmail.com ||) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668204] Review Request: buzzbird - Twitter and identi.ca desktop client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668204 --- Comment #10 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@gmail.com 2011-05-09 03:26:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) (In reply to comment #7) this does not apply to source tarball as far as I know, no bundled/pre-compiled binary file is present in final rpm. But you have to make sure that no one of the prebuilt binaries will be used during the build process. Otherwise, the resulting binaries would be affected by these libraries anyway. The solution is to remove the binaries before you do anything in your package. If it doesn't build anymore, we have a problem. If it builds properly again, then we know that all is OK. Which is not case of this review request...due to fact that %build is empty. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702957] Review Request: pclock - WindowMaker dockapp which displays an analog clock
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702957
Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de
--- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2011-05-09
03:32:47 EDT ---
Mario, here are some notes on your package:
- Remove the empty folder %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/src from the package.
- I suggest to move the examples to %{_datadir}/%{name}. The version number is
not required here.
- You probably also want to patch the start scripts with the correct path to
the pclock binary. Currently, they don't work.
- The app only works properly on my system if switch -w is given. Otherwise, I
get a black window. Maybe -w should also be added to the start scripts.
- Drop the asterisk from %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/* for proper directory
ownership.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701284] Review Request: python-py2pack - Generate distribution packages from Python packages on PyPI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701284 --- Comment #4 from Jerome Soyer sai...@gmail.com 2011-05-09 03:37:15 EDT --- http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/python-py2pack.spec http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/python-py2pack-0.3.15-2.fc14.src.rpm I uploaded a newer version which fix all the problems you notice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698264] Review Request: perl-TryCatch - First class try catch semantics for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698264 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |perl-TryCatch - First class |perl-TryCatch - First class |try catch semantics for |try catch semantics for |Perl, without source|Perl |filters | Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-05-09 04:09:55 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-TryCatch Short Description: First class try catch semantics for Perl Owners: mmaslano psabata ppisar Branches: f15 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698251] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-PPAddr - Hook into opcode execution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698251 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-05-09 04:11:43 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-B-Hooks-OP-PPAddr New Branches: f15 Owners: mmaslano psabata ppisar InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 479669] Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479669 --- Comment #10 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-05-09 04:28:24 EDT --- That's not so easy. We would need this package in EL-6 only on ppc. I'm not sure if rel-eng scripts are capable to handle it. I'd ask few people about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701284] Review Request: python-py2pack - Generate distribution packages from Python packages on PyPI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701284 Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com 2011-05-09 04:36:09 EDT --- * rpmlint output: OK % rpmlint -iv python-py2pack-0.3.15-2.fc14.src.rpm python-py2pack.src: I: checking python-py2pack.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dsc - dc, sc, desc The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. python-py2pack.src: I: checking-url http://github.com/saschpe/py2pack (timeout 10 seconds) python-py2pack.src: I: checking-url http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/p/py2pack-0.3.15.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) python-py2pack.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/p/py2pack-0.3.15.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. % rpmlint -iv /home/haikel/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/python-py2pack-0.3.15-2.fc14.noarch.rpm python-py2pack.noarch: I: checking python-py2pack.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dsc - dc, sc, desc The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. python-py2pack.noarch: I: checking-url http://github.com/saschpe/py2pack (timeout 10 seconds) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. * koji scratch build: OK koji build --scratch dist-f15 python-py2pack-0.3.15-2.fc14.src.rpm Ok for python3 support, it's better to be proactive on that matter than not. I don't think there are any blockers to push this package in Packages Collection, so i hereby grant you my blessing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675705] Review Request: rubygem-tilt - Generic interface to multiple Ruby template engines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675705 --- Comment #5 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-05-09 04:43:28 EDT --- *** Bug 646808 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 646808] Review Request: rubygem-tint - Generic interface to multiple Ruby template engines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646808 Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||vondr...@redhat.com Resolution||DUPLICATE Last Closed||2011-05-09 04:43:28 --- Comment #2 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-05-09 04:43:28 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 675705 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 479669] Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479669 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-05-09 04:40:05 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-File-pushd New Branches: el6 Owners: mmaslano iarnell InitialCC: perl-sig [Iain: I've added you if you run into problem in EPEL. You can fix it by yourself. Correct solution is add ExcludeArch (noarch packages) or ExlucusiveArch into specfile and build it only for ppc.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690728] Review Request: Nitrate - A test case management system written in Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690728 --- Comment #19 from Yuguang Wang yuw...@redhat.com 2011-05-09 04:41:20 EDT --- Thanks for reminding, replaced the python-devel with 'python2-devel': https://fedorahosted.org/nitrate/browser/trunk/nitrate/nitrate.spec or download it via: https://fedorahosted.org/nitrate/export/707d2efb843d58f6ae0a92bce63a0f6ca29068b0/trunk/nitrate/nitrate.spec The source rpm could be found here: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/n/i/nitrate/nitrate-3.3.4-1.src.rpm (In reply to comment #18) From the Python packaging guidelines: (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires) To build a package containing python2 files, you need to have BuildRequires: python2-devel Similarly, when building a package which ships python3 files, you need BuildRequires: python3-devel A package that has both python2 and python3 files will need to BuildRequire both. Please recognize that in BR, depending from the abilities of your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701811] Review Request: vo-aacenc - VisualOn AAC encoder library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701811 Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||CANTFIX Last Closed||2011-05-09 04:50:45 --- Comment #4 from Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com 2011-05-09 04:50:45 EDT --- Closing this bug then. Perhaps you may consider packaging vo-aacenc in RPMFusion or other third-party repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689797] Review Request: perl-Task-Kensho-Toolchain - Task::Kensho::Toolchain Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689797 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-05-09 04:51:39 EDT --- Because English is not my first language, I do not change what upstream wrote. In my opinion change of description given by upstream into proper American English don't make sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 479669] Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479669 --- Comment #12 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2011-05-09 05:00:53 EDT --- Unfortunately, ExcludeArch/ExclusiveArch isn't possible. See https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2010-December/msg00111.html. All we can do is rebuild the existing srpm from rhel6 for all archs and hope that people with supported architectures get the package from rhn rather than epel (I'm sure there was some mention of using priorities to encourage that but can't find it right now). It also came up again in the latest epel meeting - kevin was going to make a list of the existing some-arch packages and maybe formalize what we do with them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 479669] Review Request: perl-File-pushd - Change directory temporarily for a limited scope
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479669 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #13 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-05-09 05:29:53 EDT --- We really need guideline for it, so all package maintainers solve it same. I didn't hear about priorities. I'd rather wait with EL-6 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 696485] Review Request: django-countries - Provides a country field for Django models
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696485 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2011-05-09 05:33:23 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: django-countries Short Description: Provides a country field for Django models Owners: sundaram Branches: f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 696516] Review Request: django-robots - Robots exclusion application for Django, complementing Sitemaps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696516 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed|2011-04-30 19:06:21 |2011-05-09 05:41:20 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701284] Review Request: python-py2pack - Generate distribution packages from Python packages on PyPI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701284 --- Comment #7 from Jerome Soyer sai...@gmail.com 2011-05-09 06:24:29 EDT --- Thanks Haïkel Guémar for your review and your advice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701284] Review Request: python-py2pack - Generate distribution packages from Python packages on PyPI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701284 Jerome Soyer sai...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jerome Soyer sai...@gmail.com 2011-05-09 06:23:25 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-py2pack Short Description: py2pack is designed to generate distribution packages from Python packages on PyPI Owners: saispo Branches: f14 f15 el6 InitialCC: saispo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701343] Review Request: ghc-pandoc-types - Pandoc data structure library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701343 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-05-09 06:26:35 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ghc-pandoc-types Short Description: Pandoc data structure library Owners: petersen Branches: f15 f14 el6 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701369] Review Request: ghc-json - Haskell JSON library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701369 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-05-09 06:34:42 EDT --- Thanks a lot for reviewing. (In reply to comment #2) If %check is not going to be used, can it be removed? Sure let me remove it with a comment in the changelog. Also this warning at line 57 There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros needs fixing. How to reproduce that? Is it related to %check? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701369] Review Request: ghc-json - Haskell JSON library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701369 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2011-05-09 06:39:00 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ghc-json Short Description: Haskell JSON library Owners: petersen Branches: f15 f14 el6 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701204] Review Request: libecap - Squid interface for embedded adaptation modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701204 Jiri Skala jsk...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701204] Review Request: libecap - Squid interface for embedded adaptation modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701204 Jiri Skala jsk...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsk...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsk...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-09 07:23:44 EDT --- objenesis-1.2-7.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/objenesis-1.2-7.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590681] Review Request: objenesis - A library for instantiating Java objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590681 Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-05-09 07:25:21 --- Comment #18 from Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com 2011-05-09 07:25:21 EDT --- build done, closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608319] Review Request: memaker - An avatar creator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608319
--- Comment #11 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-05-09 07:38:35
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #3)
%{_datadir}/%{name} seems also not to be owned.
Just put a / after this entry to let your package own this directory.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories#Wildcarding_Files_inside_a_Created_Directory
Hi Mario,
Updated spec:
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/memaker/memaker.spec
SRPM:
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/memaker/memaker-20100110-1.fc16.src.rpm
Rest of the results from my mock build can be found here:
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/memaker/
Thanks,
Ankur
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567086] Review Request: VXL - C++ Libraries for Computer Vision Research and Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567086 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maths...@gmail.com Bug 567086 depends on bug 573910, which changed state. Bug 573910 Summary: Review Request: dcmtk - Offis DICOM Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573910 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703152] New: Review Request: ghc-rosezipper - Generic zipper implementation for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-rosezipper - Generic zipper implementation for Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703152 Summary: Review Request: ghc-rosezipper - Generic zipper implementation for Haskell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com, fedora-haskell-l...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- This package is required for yi (a text editor). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703152] Review Request: ghc-rosezipper - Generic zipper implementation for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703152 --- Comment #1 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com 2011-05-09 09:38:00 EDT --- http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-rosezipper.spec http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-rosezipper-0.2-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701347] Review Request: mingw32-gtkmm30 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for the GTK+ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701347 --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee 2011-05-09 10:21:46 EDT --- * Mon May 09 2011 Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee - 3.0.1-1 - Update to 3.0.1 Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-gtkmm30.spec SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-gtkmm30-3.0.1-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703178] New: Review Request: rubygem-declarative_authorization - The declarative_authorization plug in provides readable auth rules for Rails.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-declarative_authorization - The declarative_authorization plug in provides readable auth rules for Rails. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703178 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-declarative_authorization - The declarative_authorization plug in provides readable auth rules for Rails. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dpie...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-declarative_authorization.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-declarative_authorization-0.5.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: The declarative_authorization plug in provides readable auth rules for Rails. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693233] Review Request: nux - An OpenGL toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693233 Hicham HAOUARI hicham.haou...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hicham.haou...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Hicham HAOUARI hicham.haou...@gmail.com 2011-05-09 11:38:15 EDT --- Updated package : SPEC : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/unity-packaging/00-nux/nux.spec SRPM : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/unity-packaging/00-nux/nux-0.9.48-1.fc15.src.rpm Description : Nux is a graphical user interface toolkit for applications that mixes OpenGL hardware acceleration with high quality visual rendering. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701815] Review Request: vo-amrwbenc - VisualOn AMR-WB encoder library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701815 --- Comment #5 from PRABIN KUMAR DATTA linux.n@gmail.com 2011-05-09 11:43:42 EDT --- Submitted in rpmfusion: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1741 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701815] Review Request: vo-amrwbenc - VisualOn AMR-WB encoder library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701815 PRABIN KUMAR DATTA linux.n@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2011-05-09 11:42:52 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701811] Review Request: vo-aacenc - VisualOn AAC encoder library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701811 --- Comment #5 from PRABIN KUMAR DATTA linux.n@gmail.com 2011-05-09 11:51:10 EDT --- Submitted in rpmfusion: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1742 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 613766] Review Request: python-xlwt - Library to generate files compatible with Microsoft Excel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613766 Jens Kuehnel bugzilla-red...@jens.kuehnel.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzilla-redhat@jens.kuehne ||l.org --- Comment #8 from Jens Kuehnel bugzilla-red...@jens.kuehnel.org 2011-05-09 12:20:45 EDT --- Hi Jef, could you make the SRPMS and SPEC file available again? Thanks CU Jens -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 613766] Review Request: python-xlwt - Library to generate files compatible with Microsoft Excel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613766 --- Comment #9 from Jens Kuehnel bugzilla-red...@jens.kuehnel.org 2011-05-09 12:21:43 EDT --- Sorry, I hate the proxy here. Please ignore Comment #8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700141] Review Request: perl-Devel-PatchPerl - Patch perl source à la Devel::PPPort's buildperl.pl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700141 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-09 12:38:02 EDT --- perl-Devel-PatchPerl-0.30-1.el6.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Devel-PatchPerl-0.30-1.el6.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mari...@freenet.de --- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de 2011-05-09 13:57:33 EDT --- Hi Shaun, if you are new to the packaging maintainers, I assume you need a sponsor, according to the guidelines. Am I right? If yes, you should set the flag FE-NEEDSPONSOR in Blocks:. Although I'm unable to act as a sponsor, I will have a look at your package anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703248] New: Review Request: rubygem-foreigner - Foreign keys for Rails
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-foreigner - Foreign keys for Rails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703248 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-foreigner - Foreign keys for Rails Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dpie...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-foreigner.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-foreigner-0.9.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Adds helpers to migrations and correctly dumps foreign keys to schema.rb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698333] Review Request: cowdancer - Tool for limited copy-on-write directory tree access
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698333 Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org Flag|needinfo? |needinfo? --- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2011-05-09 14:03:59 EDT --- Are you aware of http://blog.tridgell.net/?p=141 too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 690919] Review Request: aswvdial - Dockapp for wvdial
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690919 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)| --- Comment #5 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2011-05-09 14:11:24 EDT --- Handling the incorrect-fsf-address issue in situations where upstream is dead/non-responsive is ultimately up to the package maintainer. It should be safe for the maintainer to replace the older COPYING file with an updated one (note, this means getting a newer COPYING with the correct address from the FSF website for the same license version, not for a different version of that license), however, if the maintainer chooses not to take that action, it is not considered a blocker. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 --- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de 2011-05-09 14:12:00 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3060852 $ rpmlint -v * itstool.src: I: checking itstool.src: I: checking-url http://itstool.org/ (timeout 10 seconds) itstool.src: I: checking-url http://files.itstool.org/itstool/itstool-1.0.1.tar.bz2 (timeout 10 seconds) itstool.noarch: I: checking itstool.noarch: I: checking-url http://itstool.org/ (timeout 10 seconds) itstool.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary itstool itstool.spec: I: checking-url http://files.itstool.org/itstool/itstool-1.0.1.tar.bz2 (timeout 10 seconds) 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Are you planning to add a manual page to itstool? Well, it is not mandatory, but would be fine to have it. Good old xml2po has a manpage, terribly outdated, but it has. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702989] Review Request: itstool - Translate XML files with PO using ITS rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702989 Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #3 from Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org 2011-05-09 14:19:27 EDT --- Thanks. I will need a sponsor. I've mostly only worked on the source tarball side of things. I'll add a manpage for 1.0.2. I think other distros are more strict about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691189] Review Request: wmbinclock - Dockapp which shows the actual system time as binary clock
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691189 Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de 2011-05-09 14:20:27 EDT --- Thanks for the review! There's no proper solution regarding the wrong FSF address. Upstream is dead for ages. Either we patch/replace such files in general, or we do nothing. See bug #690919. Perhaps I will write a man page and add it to the package next weeks. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: wmbinclock Short Description: Dockapp which shows the actual system time as binary clock Owners: mariobl Branches: f14 f15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689685] Review Request: anchorman - The recording-studio-in-a-box
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689685 Trever Fischer wm...@wm161.net changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: Anchorman - |Review Request: anchorman - |The |The |recording-studio-in-a-box |recording-studio-in-a-box -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689685] Review Request: anchorman - The recording studio in-a-box
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689685 Trever Fischer wm...@wm161.net changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: anchorman - |Review Request: anchorman - |The |The recording studio |recording-studio-in-a-box |in-a-box --- Comment #12 from Trever Fischer wm...@wm161.net 2011-05-09 14:40:21 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: anchorman Short Description: The recording studio in-a-box Owners: tdfischer Branches: f14 f15 InitialCC: tdfischer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689685] Review Request: anchorman - The recording studio in-a-box
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689685 Trever Fischer wm...@wm161.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689797] Review Request: perl-Task-Kensho-Toolchain - Task::Kensho::Toolchain Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689797
Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mari...@freenet.de
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de 2011-05-09 14:42:34
EDT ---
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
GPL+ or Artistic
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
$ md5sum *
c1dc5ff6f2533dcf2d79123618e993f2 Task-Kensho-Toolchain-0.27.tar.gz
c1dc5ff6f2533dcf2d79123618e993f2
Task-Kensho-Toolchain-0.27.tar.gz.packaged
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
- Succesful Koji build available.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[.] MUST: If a package installs files below %{_datadir}/icons, the icon cache
must be updated.
[.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Packages must not provide RPM dependency information when that
information is not global in nature, or are otherwise handled.
[.] MUST: When filtering automatically generated RPM dependency information,
the filtering system implemented by Fedora must be used.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), ...
[.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
[.] MUST: .desktop files must be properly installed with desktop-file-install
in the %install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream...
[+] SHOULD: Timestamps of files should be preserved.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
See Koji build above (which uses mock anyway)
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
I assume the packager has tested it. Don't know how to test it on my
system.
[+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
[.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
[.] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg.
[.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/bin, or /usr/sbin ...
[.] SHOULD: Your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts.
PACKAGE APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 699205] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy - Convert or render graphs as ASCII, HTML, SVG or via Graphviz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699205
Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mari...@freenet.de
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de 2011-05-09 14:47:47
EDT ---
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
GPL+ or Artistic
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
md5sum *
ced2a9ebee7b751d3223317f46dc08c0 Graph-Easy-0.70.tar.gz
ced2a9ebee7b751d3223317f46dc08c0 Graph-Easy-0.70.tar.gz.packaged
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
- Succesful Koji build available.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[.] MUST: If a package installs files below %{_datadir}/icons, the icon cache
must be updated.
[.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Packages must not provide RPM dependency information when that
information is not global in nature, or are otherwise handled.
[.] MUST: When filtering automatically generated RPM dependency information,
the filtering system implemented by Fedora must be used.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), ...
[.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
[.] MUST: .desktop files must be properly installed with desktop-file-install
in the %install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream...
[+] SHOULD: Timestamps of files should be preserved.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
See Koji build above (which uses mock anyway)
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
I assume the packager has tested it.
[+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
[.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
[.] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg.
[.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/bin, or /usr/sbin ...
[.] SHOULD: Your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts.
PACKAGE APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702957] Review Request: pclock - WindowMaker dockapp which displays an analog clock
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702957 --- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann mari...@freenet.de 2011-05-09 14:59:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) - The app only works properly on my system if switch -w is given. Otherwise, I get a black window. Maybe -w should also be added to the start scripts. The switch -w is common to almost all dockapps. These applets are intended to be running in a dock rather than a window. And the docks (in Afterstep, Blackbox, Fluxbox, Openbox and Windowmaker) doesn't behave identically. Sometimes the switch is needed, sometimes not. That's why I wouldn't add -w generally. In my Fluxbox dock (named slit here) the switch is not needed for pclock, but wmnet needs it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 699205] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy - Convert or render graphs as ASCII, HTML, SVG or via Graphviz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699205 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 699205] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy - Convert or render graphs as ASCII, HTML, SVG or via Graphviz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699205 --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2011-05-09 15:16:47 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Graph-Easy Short Description: Convert or render graphs as ASCII, HTML, SVG or via Graphviz Owners: iarnell Branches: f13 f14 f15 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 687942] Review Request: mysql-sandbox - Quick painless install of side by side MySQL server in isolation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=687942 Jeffrey Ness jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2011-05-09 15:19:38 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey Ness jeffrey.n...@rackspace.com 2011-05-09 15:19:38 EDT --- Looks like upstream is ignoring this issue https://answers.launchpad.net/mysql-sandbox/+question/151299 I'm very hesitant to add a package to EPEL with the developers not being active enough to answer / address issues. Going to close out this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668204] Review Request: buzzbird - Twitter and identi.ca desktop client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668204 --- Comment #11 from Christopher Aillon cail...@redhat.com 2011-05-09 16:50:20 EDT --- Sure, but you're generating the source tarball anyway, stripping out the binary cruft isn't that much more difficult and would probably make reviewers happier (at least it would make me happier). Anyway, a note that due to the gecko requires, this will not work on F15 or newer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678442] Review Request: os-prober - Probes disks on the system for installed operating systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678442 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-09 16:54:10 EDT --- os-prober-1.46-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 699902] Review Request: python-manuel - Build tested documentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699902 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-manuel-1.5.0-2.fc15 |python-manuel-1.5.0-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678442] Review Request: os-prober - Probes disks on the system for installed operating systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678442 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|os-prober-1.46-2.fc15 |os-prober-1.46-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 699902] Review Request: python-manuel - Build tested documentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699902 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-09 16:54:36 EDT --- python-manuel-1.5.0-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700141] Review Request: perl-Devel-PatchPerl - Patch perl source à la Devel::PPPort's buildperl.pl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700141 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-09 16:53:58 EDT --- perl-Devel-PatchPerl-0.30-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679133] Review Request: starcal - A desktop calendar with Gregorian, Jalali and Hijri support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679133 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-09 16:55:31 EDT --- starcal-1.5.3-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700141] Review Request: perl-Devel-PatchPerl - Patch perl source à la Devel::PPPort's buildperl.pl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700141 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Devel-PatchPerl-0.30-1 |perl-Devel-PatchPerl-0.30-1 |.fc15 |.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679133] Review Request: starcal - A desktop calendar with Gregorian, Jalali and Hijri support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679133 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||starcal-1.5.3-1.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-05-09 16:55:37 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700141] Review Request: perl-Devel-PatchPerl - Patch perl source à la Devel::PPPort's buildperl.pl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700141 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-09 16:57:01 EDT --- perl-Devel-PatchPerl-0.30-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700141] Review Request: perl-Devel-PatchPerl - Patch perl source à la Devel::PPPort's buildperl.pl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700141 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Devel-PatchPerl-0.30-1 |perl-Devel-PatchPerl-0.30-1 |.fc14 |.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697680] Review Request: surf-geometry - visualizer for real algebraic geometry
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697680
--- Comment #7 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2011-05-09 17:00:52 EDT
---
Thanks for the review, Mario.
(In reply to comment #6)
[x] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
%{_datadir}/surf-geometry
just put a / after this entry to let the package own this folder and its
content.
I don't understand. I have this in %files:
%{_datadir}/surf-geometry
and after installing, I see that that directory is owned:
$ rpm -ql surf-geometry
/usr/bin/surf-geometry
/usr/share/doc/surf-geometry-1.0.6
/usr/share/doc/surf-geometry-1.0.6/AUTHORS
/usr/share/doc/surf-geometry-1.0.6/COPYING
/usr/share/doc/surf-geometry-1.0.6/ChangeLog
/usr/share/doc/surf-geometry-1.0.6/NEWS
/usr/share/doc/surf-geometry-1.0.6/README
/usr/share/doc/surf-geometry-1.0.6/TODO
/usr/share/doc/surf-geometry-1.0.6/background.pic
/usr/share/doc/surf-geometry-1.0.6/manual-1.html
/usr/share/doc/surf-geometry-1.0.6/manual-2.html
/usr/share/doc/surf-geometry-1.0.6/manual-3.html
/usr/share/doc/surf-geometry-1.0.6/manual-4.html
/usr/share/doc/surf-geometry-1.0.6/manual.html
/usr/share/man/man1/surf.1.gz
/usr/share/mime/packages/surf.xml
/usr/share/surf-geometry
/usr/share/surf-geometry/surf.xpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693608] Review Request: icinga - System Monitoring Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693608 --- Comment #6 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 2011-05-09 17:07:27 EDT --- Mike, if you incorporate the changes in the last three comments and post your updated files, I'll do a formal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693608] Review Request: icinga - System Monitoring Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693608 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 483859] Review Request: libg3d - Library for 3D file/object viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483859 Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2011-05-09 17:44:07 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 483863] Review Request: g3dviewer - A 3D file/object viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483863 Bug 483863 depends on bug 483859, which changed state. Bug 483859 Summary: Review Request: libg3d - Library for 3D file/object viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483859 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NOTABUG Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703305] New: Review Request: mingw32-libtasn1 - MinGW Windows libtasn1 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libtasn1 - MinGW Windows libtasn1 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703305 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libtasn1 - MinGW Windows libtasn1 library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ka...@smartlink.ee QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libtasn1.spec SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libtasn1-2.7-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: libtasn1 is the ASN.1 library used in GNUTLS. This package contains the MinGW Windows cross compiled libtasn1 library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703305] Review Request: mingw32-libtasn1 - MinGW Windows libtasn1 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703305 Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-mingw@lists.fedorapr ||oject.org --- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee 2011-05-09 17:52:21 EDT --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3061368 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693493] Review Request: thunderbird-lightning - The calendar extension to Thunderbird
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693493 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-05-09 18:45:57 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703322] New: Review Request: tpp - text presentation program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tpp - text presentation program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703322 Summary: Review Request: tpp - text presentation program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jes...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://jmrodri.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/tpp.spec SRPM URL: http://jmrodri.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/tpp-1.3.1-3.fc14.src.rpm Description: tpp stands for text presentation program and is an ncurses-based presentation tool. The presentation can be written with your favorite editor in a simple description format and then shown on any text terminal that is supported by ncurses - ranging from an old VT100 to the Linux framebuffer to an xterm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 190362] Review Request: unifdef
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190362 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-09 22:24:57 EDT --- unifdef-1.171-10.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unifdef-1.171-10.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 694950] Review Request: torrent-search - A torrent searching graphical application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694950 --- Comment #11 from Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com 2011-05-09 23:08:24 EDT --- Thanks for reminding, I will do it with-in 2-3 days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701932] Review Request: pymacs - Emacs and Python integration framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701932
Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||du...@redhat.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|du...@redhat.com
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com 2011-05-09 23:09:05 EDT ---
Hi, thanks for packaging this! The Python packaging looks fine with me. One
suggestion is that the package should follow the Emacs packaging guideline,
since the description says once started from Emacs. This sounds for me that
the package is mainly used with Emacs.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Emacs
To migrate, the package will need to:
- be renamed or split from pymacs to emacs-pymacs
- byte-compile /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/pymacs.el
- use %{_emacs_site*dir} macros
- add a startup file for autoloading
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679133] Review Request: starcal - A desktop calendar with Gregorian, Jalali and Hijri support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679133 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-09 23:34:45 EDT --- starcal-1.5.3-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 679133] Review Request: starcal - A desktop calendar with Gregorian, Jalali and Hijri support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679133 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|starcal-1.5.3-1.fc14|starcal-1.5.3-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689039] Review Request: csdp - C library for SemiDefinite Programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689039 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||csdp-6.1.1-1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-05-09 23:33:12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689039] Review Request: csdp - C library for SemiDefinite Programming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689039 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-09 23:33:07 EDT --- csdp-6.1.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
