[Bug 698067] Review Request: hiredis - A C client library for redis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698067
--- Comment #3 from Shakthi Kannan 2011-05-10 03:11:36
EDT ---
Thanks for your comments. Updated:
SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/hiredis.spec
SRPM:
http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/hiredis-0.10.0-1.gitdf203bc328.fc14.src.rpm
* The 0.10.0 fails to build, so have updated to hiredis-0.10.0-1.gitdf203bc328.
* Updated use of:
make install PREFIX=%{buildroot}/%{_prefix}
INSTALL_LIB=%{buildroot}/%{_libdir}
For 64-bit, we need to override LIBRARY_PATH.
* redis is not required to build hiredis, but, only to use it. Hence, have used
Requires.
* Added TODO file as documentation.
$ rpmlint hiredis.spec
hiredis.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: hiredis.gitdf203bc328.tar.bz2
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint hiredis-0.10.0-1.gitdf203bc328.fc14.src.rpm
hiredis.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) minimalistic -> minimalist,
Minimalist, minimalism
hiredis.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US minimalistic ->
minimalist, Minimalist, minimalism
hiredis.src: W: invalid-url Source0: hiredis.gitdf203bc328.tar.bz2
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
$ rpmlint hiredis-0.10.0-1.gitdf203bc328.fc14.i686.rpm
hiredis.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) minimalistic -> minimalist,
Minimalist, minimalism
hiredis.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US minimalistic ->
minimalist, Minimalist, minimalism
hiredis.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary hiredis-example
hiredis.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary hiredis-test
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
$ rpmlint hiredis-devel-0.10.0-1.gitdf203bc328.fc14.i686.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Successful Koji builds for F-14, F-15, and EL-6:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3062235
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3062238
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3062241
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675234] Review Request: duply - Wrapper for duplicity
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675234 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Moschny 2011-05-10 03:14:33 EDT --- Updated spec and src rpm: Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/duply/duply.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/duply/duply-1.5.5-1.fc14.src.rpm %changelog * Tue May 10 2011 Thomas Moschny <..> - 1.5.5-1 - Update to 1.5.5. - Generate and pack a man page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689797] Review Request: perl-Task-Kensho-Toolchain - Task::Kensho::Toolchain Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689797 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marcela Mašláňová 2011-05-10 03:33:51 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Task-Kensho-Toolchain Short Description: Task::Kensho::Toolchain Perl module Owners: mmaslano psabata ppisar Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703367] New: Review Request: sxiv - Simple (or small or suckless) X Image Viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sxiv - Simple (or small or suckless) X Image Viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703367 Summary: Review Request: sxiv - Simple (or small or suckless) X Image Viewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: psab...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://psabata.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/sxiv/sxiv.spec SRPM URL: http://psabata.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/sxiv/sxiv-0.8.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: sxiv is an alternative to feh and qiv. Its only dependency besides xlib is imlib2. The primary goal for writing sxiv is to create an image viewer, which only has the most basic features required for fast image viewing (the ones I want). It works nicely with tiling window managers and its code base should be kept small and clean to make it easy for you to dig into it and customize it for your needs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670302] Review Request: libbacklight - Linux backlight abstraction library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670302 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DEFERRED Status Whiteboard||stalledsubmitter Flag|fedora-review+ | Last Closed||2011-05-10 04:06:17 --- Comment #10 from Ralf Corsepius 2011-05-10 04:06:17 EDT --- Another 2 weeks have past. Still not CVS-request. REVOKING approval, Closing STALLED SUBMITTER. Feel free to resubmit your package, when you have more time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633104] Review Request: monkeysphere - Use the OpenPGP web of trust to verify ssh connections
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633104 --- Comment #13 from Michal Nowak 2011-05-10 04:25:49 EDT --- It's quite some time I did my last package review; is there anything I should set/do so we can proceed towards Fedora dist-git? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 633104] Review Request: monkeysphere - Use the OpenPGP web of trust to verify ssh connections
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633104 Martin Gieseking changed: What|Removed |Added CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de --- Comment #14 from Martin Gieseking 2011-05-10 04:37:08 EDT --- No, everything looks good so far. Bernie should now request a Git repo for the package: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703392] New: Review Request: perl-threads-lite - Actor model threading for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-threads-lite - Actor model threading for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703392 Summary: Review Request: perl-threads-lite - Actor model threading for Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-threads-lite/perl-threads-lite.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-threads-lite/perl-threads-lite-0.030-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: This module implements threads for perl. One crucial difference with threads.pm threads is that the threads are disconnected, except by message queues. It thus facilitates a message passing style of multi-threading. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701932] Review Request: pymacs - Emacs and Python integration framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701932 --- Comment #2 from Stanislav Ochotnicky 2011-05-10 04:47:30 EDT --- Thanks for the review, appreciated. As you noticed this was my first emacs package so sorry for those mistakes. Hope everything is OK now. I tested this with ropemacs and it seemed to work including autoload. * Tue May 10 2011 Stanislav Ochotnicky - 0.23-2 - Rename to emacs-pymacs - Use emacs macros - Byte-compile elisp source and put sources into subpackage Spec URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/emacs-pymacs.spec SRPM URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/emacs-pymacs-0.23-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703392] Review Request: perl-threads-lite - Actor model threading for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703392 Petr Sabata changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701204] Review Request: libecap - Squid interface for embedded adaptation modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701204
--- Comment #2 from Jiri Skala 2011-05-10 04:58:36 EDT ---
1. rpmline RESULTS:
libecap.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eCAP -> e Cap, CAP, e
CAP
libecap-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
2. SPEC file issue(s):
- LICENCE have to be cited among %doc items
- %{?dist} in Release is not mandatory. I'd appreciate using it cos I suppose
I'll make not only Fedora's builds.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703392] Review Request: perl-threads-lite - Actor model threading for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703392 --- Comment #1 from Petr Sabata 2011-05-10 05:13:16 EDT --- Build fails in mock/koji, complaining %perl_default_filter is undefined. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703392] Review Request: perl-threads-lite - Actor model threading for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703392 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar 2011-05-10 05:20:00 EDT --- Fixed. Updated package on the same URLs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701932] Review Request: emacs-pymacs - Emacs and Python integration framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701932
Daiki Ueno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: pymacs -|Review Request:
|Emacs and Python|emacs-pymacs - Emacs and
|integration framework |Python integration
||framework
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Daiki Ueno 2011-05-10 05:30:35 EDT ---
It looks fine except that:
- Requires: should be "emacs(bin) >= %{_emacs_version}"
- You could use %{name} instead of emacs-%{pkg} everywhere
- The license looks GPLv2+ as far as I checked the files in the source tree
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701932] Review Request: emacs-pymacs - Emacs and Python integration framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701932 Stanislav Ochotnicky changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Stanislav Ochotnicky 2011-05-10 06:39:00 EDT --- Thanks for the review, appreciated. I got confused with emacs-filesystem, but in the end I figured it out. Thanks for pointing out the problems. Final fixes: Spec URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/emacs-pymacs.spec SRPM URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/emacs-pymacs-0.23-3.fc14.src.rpm New Package SCM Request === Package Name: emacs-pymacs Short Description: Emacs and Python integration framework Owners: sochotni Branches: f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703392] Review Request: perl-threads-lite - Actor model threading for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703392
Petr Sabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Petr Sabata 2011-05-10 06:54:30 EDT ---
Package: perl-threads-lite
Version: 0.030
Release: 1.fc14
Sources: threads-lite-0.030.tar.gz
Patches:
--
Package successfully built locally.
Package successfully built in mock, fedora-rawhide-x86_64.
Package successfully built in mock, fedora-rawhide-i386.
Package successfully built in mock, fedora-15-x86_64.
Package successfully built in mock, fedora-15-i386.
Package successfully built in mock, fedora-14-x86_64.
Package successfully built in mock, fedora-14-i386.
Package successfully built in koji, dist-rawhide.
MUST items:
[ OK ] Package does NOT include pre-built binaries or libraries
[ OK ] Spec file is legible and written in American english
[ OK ] Package successfully builds on at least one supported primary
architecture
[ -- ] All ExcludeArch tags valid, referencing proper bug reports
[ OK ] Package obeys FHS (with _libexecdir and /srv exceptions)
[ NOTE ] No errors reported by rpmlint
[ OK ] Changelog present and properly formatted
[ OK ] Package does NOT include Packager, Vendor, Copyright or PreReq tags
[ OK ] Source tags are working URLs and sources match upstream or justified
otherwise
[ OK ] Requires correct or justified otherwise
[ NOTE ] BuildRequires correct or justified otherwise
[ OK ] All file names are in proper UTF-8 encoding
[ OK ] All plain text failes are in proper UTF-8 encoding
[ -- ] Large documentation files are located in doc subpackage
[ OK ] All documentation prefixed with %doc
[ OK ] Documentation is NOT executable
[ OK ] No files in %doc are needed at run-time
[ OK ] Compiler flags honor Fedora defaults or are justified
[ OK ] Package generates useful debuginfo packages
[ -- ] Header files are placed in devel subpackage
[ -- ] Unversioned shared libraries are placed in devel subpackage
[ -- ] Pkgconfig files are placed in devel subpackage
[ -- ] Full-versioned Requires of the base package in subpackages
[ -- ] Package calls ldconfig in post and postun sections for all
subpackages, if applicable
[ -- ] Static libraries are provided by static subpackage
[ OK ] Package contains no static executables unless approved by FESCo
[ OK ] Package does NOT bundle any system libraries
[ OK ] RPath not used for anything besides internal libraries
[ -- ] All config files are marked noreplace or justified otherwise
[ OK ] No config files are located under /usr
[ -- ] Package contains a SystemV-compatible initscript
[ -- ] A GUI application installs a proper desktop file
[ -- ] All desktop files are installed by desktop-file-install or justified
otherwise
[ OK ] Package consistently uses macros
[ -- ] makeinstall macro is used only if make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
does NOT work
[ -- ] Macros in Summary and description are expandable at build-time
[ -- ] globals used in place of defines
[ -- ] Locales handled correctly -- package requires gettext and uses
find_lang, if applicable
[ -- ] Scriptlets are sane
[ OK ] Package is not relocatable unless justified
[ OK ] Package contains only acceptable code or content
[ OK ] Package owns all the files and directories it creates, installs and/or
uses unless those are already owned by another package
[ OK ] files sections do NOT contain duplicate files except for licenses
[ OK ] Package does NOT cause any conflicts
[ OK ] Package does NOT contain kernel modules
[ OK ] Package does NOT bundle fonts or other general purpose data
[ OK ] Final Requires and Provides are sane
SHOULD items:
[ OK ] The Summary does NOT end with a period
[ OK ] Package does NOT include BuildRoot tag, clean section or buildroot
removal in install section
[ OK ] Package should preserve files timestamps
[ OK ] Package does NOT explicitly BuildRequire bash, bzip2, coreutils, cpio,
diffutils, fedora-release, findutils, gawk, gcc, gcc-c++, grep, gzip, info,
make, patch, redhat-rpm-config, rpm-build, sed, shadow-utils, tar, unzip,
util-linux-ng, which or xz
[ OK ] Description does NOT consist of lines longer than 80 characters
[ -- ] Package uses parallel make
[ -- ] In case of a web application, package installs date into /usr/share
instead of /var/www
[ -- ] All patches have a comment or an upstream bug link
[ -- ] Package installs manpages for all executables
[ OK ] Package contains check section and all tests pass
[ ?? ] Package works as expected
NOTES:
--
1. rpmlint reports wrong FSF address in the LICENSE file
There's not much we could do about it besides reporting upstream.
2. threads::lite::tid uses
[Bug 703456] New: Review Request: perl-Scriptalicious - Make scripts more delicious to system administrators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Scriptalicious - Make scripts more delicious to system administrators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703456 Summary: Review Request: perl-Scriptalicious - Make scripts more delicious to system administrators Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Scriptalicious/perl-Scriptalicious.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Scriptalicious/perl-Scriptalicious-1.16-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: This module helps you write scripts that conform to best common practices, quickly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630282] Review Request: ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl - Monad-transformer for Control.Exception
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282 Lakshmi Narasimhan changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(maths...@gmail.co ||m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703456] Review Request: perl-Scriptalicious - Make scripts more delicious to system administrators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703456 Petr Sabata changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703461] New: Review Request: perl-threads-tbb - Interface to the Threading Building Blocks (TBB) API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-threads-tbb - Interface to the Threading Building Blocks (TBB) API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703461 Summary: Review Request: perl-threads-tbb - Interface to the Threading Building Blocks (TBB) API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-threads-tbb/perl-threads-tbb.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-threads-tbb/perl-threads-tbb-0.02-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: This module provides access to a few core TBB API functions to Perl programs. The algorithms employed by TBB are quite different to threads as provided by "use threads;" - instead of directly starting threads and managing their activity and communication/synchronization, an API is provided that provides data parallelism. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703461] Review Request: perl-threads-tbb - Interface to the Threading Building Blocks (TBB) API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703461 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||703456 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693275] Review Request: cuneiform - Command-line OCR system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693275 Pavel Zhukov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pa...@zhukoff.net --- Comment #7 from Pavel Zhukov 2011-05-10 08:18:25 EDT --- I'll review it! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703456] Review Request: perl-Scriptalicious - Make scripts more delicious to system administrators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703456 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||703461 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703248] Review Request: rubygem-foreigner - Foreign keys for Rails
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703248
--- Comment #2 from Darryl L. Pierce 2011-05-10 08:35:00
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I'm taking the review. You could check:
>
> http://lukas.zapletalovi.com/2011/01/how-to-prepare-gemfile-package-for.html
>
> if you use rubygem-gem2rpm in F-14.
Following the steps about removing the build and prep sections results in
additional warnings from rpmlint, so I'm leaving them in for now. Otherwise,
I've followed the suggestions. Thanks. :)
> 1. Use %global instead of %define
Done
> 2. Add "Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" as described in the Ruby packaging
> guideline
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#Ruby_Packaging_Guidelines
Done.
> 3. I get "File listed twice" warning when building
>
> warning: File listed twice:
> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/foreigner-0.9.2/README.rdoc
>
> This is because of the following lines in %files:
>
> %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/
> %doc %{geminstdir}/README.rdoc
>
> where %{geminstdir} == %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/. You could work
> around this by listing files/dirs under %{geminstdir} individually.
Fixed.
> 4. You can drop preparing/cleaning buildroot
Done.
> 5. License is MIT (not GPLv2+ and Ruby)
Corrected.
> 6. It is recommended to run test suite in %check
I'm working with the upstream to fix his tests, which are currently not working
correctly.
Updated SPEC: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-foreigner.spec
Updated SRPM:
http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-foreigner-0.9.2-2.fc14.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703464] New: Review Request: google-gson - conversion of Java objects into JSON representation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: google-gson - conversion of Java objects into JSON representation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703464 Summary: Review Request: google-gson - conversion of Java objects into JSON representation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jca...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://tavvva.net/files/redhat/google-gson/google-gson.spec SRPM URL: http://tavvva.net/files/redhat/google-gson/google-gson-1.7.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Hi. I would appreciate a review for google-gson. Gson is a Java library that can be used to convert a Java object into its JSON representation. It can also be used to convert a JSON string into an equivalent Java object. Gson can work with arbitrary Java objects including pre-existing objects that you do not have source-code of. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703392] Review Request: perl-threads-lite - Actor model threading for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703392 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar 2011-05-10 08:40:08 EDT --- > 1. rpmlint reports wrong FSF address in the LICENSE file > There's not much we could do about it besides reporting upstream. Reported: http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=68064 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703392] Review Request: perl-threads-lite - Actor model threading for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703392 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703392] Review Request: perl-threads-lite - Actor model threading for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703392 --- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar 2011-05-10 08:41:21 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-threads-lite Short Description: Actor model threading for Perl Owners: ppisar mmaslano psabata Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703464] Review Request: google-gson - conversion of Java objects into JSON representation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703464 Stanislav Ochotnicky changed: What|Removed |Added CC||socho...@redhat.com Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701204] Review Request: libecap - Squid interface for embedded adaptation modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701204
--- Comment #3 from Spike 2011-05-10 08:48:40 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> - LICENCE have to be cited among %doc items
Fixed
> - %{?dist} in Release is not mandatory. I'd appreciate using it cos I suppose
> I'll make not only Fedora's builds.
Fixed
New spec and SRPM:
http://spike.fedorapeople.org/libecap/libecap.spec
http://spike.fedorapeople.org/libecap/libecap-0.0.3-2.fc16.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703456] Review Request: perl-Scriptalicious - Make scripts more delicious to system administrators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703456
--- Comment #1 from Petr Sabata 2011-05-10 09:01:34 EDT ---
Package: perl-Scriptalicious
Version: 1.16
Release: 1.fc14
Sources: Scriptalicious-1.16.tar.gz
Patches:
--
Package failed to build locally!
Package successfully built in mock, fedora-rawhide-x86_64.
Package successfully built in mock, fedora-rawhide-i386.
Package successfully built in mock, fedora-15-x86_64.
Package successfully built in mock, fedora-15-i386.
Package successfully built in mock, fedora-14-x86_64.
Package successfully built in mock, fedora-14-i386.
Package successfully built in koji, dist-rawhide.
MUST items:
[ OK ] Package does NOT include pre-built binaries or libraries
[ OK ] Spec file is legible and written in American english
[ OK ] Package successfully builds on at least one supported primary
architecture
[ -- ] All ExcludeArch tags valid, referencing proper bug reports
[ OK ] Package obeys FHS (with _libexecdir and /srv exceptions)
[ OK ] No errors reported by rpmlint
[ OK ] Changelog present and properly formatted
[ OK ] Package does NOT include Packager, Vendor, Copyright or PreReq tags
[ OK ] Source tags are working URLs and sources match upstream or justified
otherwise
[ OK ] Requires correct or justified otherwise
[ FAIL ] BuildRequires correct or justified otherwise
[ OK ] All file names are in proper UTF-8 encoding
[ OK ] All plain text failes are in proper UTF-8 encoding
[ -- ] Large documentation files are located in doc subpackage
[ OK ] All documentation prefixed with %doc
[ OK ] Documentation is NOT executable
[ OK ] No files in %doc are needed at run-time
[ -- ] Compiler flags honor Fedora defaults or are justified
[ -- ] Package generates useful debuginfo packages
[ -- ] Header files are placed in devel subpackage
[ -- ] Unversioned shared libraries are placed in devel subpackage
[ -- ] Pkgconfig files are placed in devel subpackage
[ -- ] Full-versioned Requires of the base package in subpackages
[ -- ] Package calls ldconfig in post and postun sections for all
subpackages, if applicable
[ -- ] Static libraries are provided by static subpackage
[ OK ] Package contains no static executables unless approved by FESCo
[ OK ] Package does NOT bundle any system libraries
[ -- ] RPath not used for anything besides internal libraries
[ -- ] All config files are marked noreplace or justified otherwise
[ OK ] No config files are located under /usr
[ -- ] Package contains a SystemV-compatible initscript
[ -- ] A GUI application installs a proper desktop file
[ -- ] All desktop files are installed by desktop-file-install or justified
otherwise
[ OK ] Package consistently uses macros
[ -- ] makeinstall macro is used only if make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
does NOT work
[ -- ] Macros in Summary and description are expandable at build-time
[ -- ] globals used in place of defines
[ -- ] Locales handled correctly -- package requires gettext and uses
find_lang, if applicable
[ -- ] Scriptlets are sane
[ OK ] Package is not relocatable unless justified
[ OK ] Package contains only acceptable code or content
[ OK ] Package owns all the files and directories it creates, installs and/or
uses unless those are already owned by another package
[ OK ] files sections do NOT contain duplicate files except for licenses
[ OK ] Package does NOT cause any conflicts
[ OK ] Package does NOT contain kernel modules
[ OK ] Package does NOT bundle fonts or other general purpose data
[ OK ] Final Requires and Provides are sane
SHOULD items:
[ OK ] The Summary does NOT end with a period
[ OK ] Package does NOT include BuildRoot tag, clean section or buildroot
removal in install section
[ OK ] Package should preserve files timestamps
[ OK ] Package does NOT explicitly BuildRequire bash, bzip2, coreutils, cpio,
diffutils, fedora-release, findutils, gawk, gcc, gcc-c++, grep, gzip, info,
make, patch, redhat-rpm-config, rpm-build, sed, shadow-utils, tar, unzip,
util-linux-ng, which or xz
[ OK ] Description does NOT consist of lines longer than 80 characters
[ OK ] Package uses parallel make
[ -- ] In case of a web application, package installs date into /usr/share
instead of /var/www
[ -- ] All patches have a comment or an upstream bug link
[ -- ] Package installs manpages for all executables
[ OK ] Package contains check section and all tests pass
[ ?? ] Package works as expected
NOTES:
--
BuildRequire perl(base).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701204] Review Request: libecap - Squid interface for embedded adaptation modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701204 Jiri Skala changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698590] Review Request: drupal6-features - Provides feature management for Drupal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698590
Paul W. Frields changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Paul W. Frields 2011-05-10 09:34:38
EDT ---
[ O K ] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted
in the review.
[ O K ] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines.
[ O K ] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the
format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[ O K ] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[ O K ] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and
meet the Licensing Guidelines.
[ O K ] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[ O K ] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[ O K ] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[ O K ] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[ O K ] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
$ md5sum rpmbuild/SOURCES/drupal6-features-1.0/features-6.x-1.0.tar.gz ; curl
-s -o - http://ftp.drupal.org/files/projects/features-6.x-1.0.tar.gz | md5sum -
f63eb94c7ae5c553d3d4327ef0b9174b
rpmbuild/SOURCES/drupal6-features-1.0/features-6.x-1.0.tar.gz
f63eb94c7ae5c553d3d4327ef0b9174b -
[ O K ] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms
on at least one primary architecture.
[ N/A ] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
[ O K ] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except
for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[ O K ] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using
the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[ N/A ] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[ O K ] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[ O K ] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[ O K ] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does
not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which
does create that directory.
[ O K ] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific
situations)
[ O K ] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be
set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include
a %defattr(...) line.
[ O K ] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[ O K ] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[ O K ] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not
restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity).
[ O K ] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must
run properly if it is not present.
[ N/A ] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[ N/A ] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[ N/A ] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in
a -devel package.
[ N/A ] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the
base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}
[ O K ] MUST: Packages must NOT contain
[Bug 703488] New: Review Request: libmygpo-qt - Qt Library that wraps the gpodder.net Web API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libmygpo-qt - Qt Library that wraps the gpodder.net Web API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703488 Summary: Review Request: libmygpo-qt - Qt Library that wraps the gpodder.net Web API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdie...@math.unl.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libmygpo-qt/libmygpo-qt.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libmygpo-qt/libmygpo-qt-1.0.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: libmygpo-qt is a Qt Library that wraps the gpodder.net Web API, http://wiki.gpodder.org/wiki/Web_Services/API_2 Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3062925 rpmlint: $ rpmlint *.rpm */*.rpm libmygpo-qt.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) gpodder -> plodder, prodder, doddery libmygpo-qt.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gpodder -> plodder, prodder, doddery libmygpo-qt.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) gpodder -> plodder, prodder, doddery libmygpo-qt.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gpodder -> plodder, prodder, doddery libmygpo-qt-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703488] Review Request: libmygpo-qt - Qt Library that wraps the gpodder.net Web API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703488 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2011-05-10 10:01:01 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libmygpo-qt/libmygpo-qt-1.0.2-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703488] Review Request: libmygpo-qt - Qt Library that wraps the gpodder.net Web API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703488 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997(kde-reviews) --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2011-05-10 10:00:11 EDT --- Needed by amarok-2.4.1+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703456] Review Request: perl-Scriptalicious - Make scripts more delicious to system administrators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703456 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar 2011-05-10 10:04:10 EDT --- Package BuildRequiring perl(base) published on the same addresses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703456] Review Request: perl-Scriptalicious - Make scripts more delicious to system administrators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703456 Petr Sabata changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Petr Sabata 2011-05-10 10:15:03 EDT --- --- a/perl-Scriptalicious.spec +++ b/perl-Scriptalicious.spec @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) BuildRequires: perl(Getopt::Long) BuildRequires: perl(Term::ReadKey) # Test-time only: +BuildRequires: perl(base) BuildRequires: perl(Exporter) BuildRequires: perl(lib) BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) -- Approving. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703456] Review Request: perl-Scriptalicious - Make scripts more delicious to system administrators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703456 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703456] Review Request: perl-Scriptalicious - Make scripts more delicious to system administrators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703456 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar 2011-05-10 10:28:17 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Scriptalicious Short Description: Make scripts more delicious to system administrators Owners: ppisar mmaslano psabata Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703502] New: Review Request: ghc-executable-path - Haskell library to find full path of an executable
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-executable-path - Haskell library to find full path of an executable Alias: ghc-executable-path https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703502 Summary: Review Request: ghc-executable-path - Haskell library to find full path of an executable Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com, fedora-haskell-l...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-executable-path.spec SRPM link : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-executable-path-0.0.2-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703503] New: Review Request: ghc-xdg-basedir - Haskell library implementing XDG base directory spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-xdg-basedir - Haskell library implementing XDG base directory spec Alias: ghc-xdg-basedir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703503 Summary: Review Request: ghc-xdg-basedir - Haskell library implementing XDG base directory spec Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lakshminaras2...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com, fedora-haskell-l...@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec file: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-xdg-basedir.spec SRPM link: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-xdg-basedir-0.2-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698590] Review Request: drupal6-features - Provides feature management for Drupal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698590 Peter Borsa changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Peter Borsa 2011-05-10 10:41:50 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: drupal6-features Short Description: The features module enables the capture and management of features in Drupal. A feature is a collection of Drupal entities which taken together satisfy a certain use-case. Owners: asrob Branches: f14 f15 el5 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 673784] Rename Request: mingw32-filesystem -> mingw-filesystem - Cross compiler base filesystem and environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673784 --- Comment #31 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 11:14:26 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225280] Merge Review: aspell-pl - Polish dictionaries for Aspell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225280 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 11:12:48 EDT --- I'll clear the fedora-cvs flag so this doesn't appear in the ticket list. Please do re-raise the flag if you provide the information I requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658450] Review Request: ATpy - Astronomical Tables in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658450 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 11:13:15 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 678855] Review Request: python-rpyc - A Transparent, Symmetrical Python Library for Distributed-Computing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678855 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 11:20:48 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684429] Review Request: wbfs-manager - A WBFS manager for Linux using GTK+
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684429 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 11:24:04 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Although I have to add that neither the Summary: nor the %description actually tell you anything about what the package actually does. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703322] Review Request: tpp - text presentation program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703322
--- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2011-05-10 11:29:51
EDT ---
Please don't mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 696485] Review Request: django-countries - Provides a country field for Django models
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696485 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 11:29:28 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 691189] Review Request: wmbinclock - Dockapp which shows the actual system time as binary clock
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691189 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 11:29:09 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689685] Review Request: anchorman - The recording studio in-a-box
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689685 --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 11:28:21 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684475] Review Request: wmblob - Dockapp which shows funny moving `blobs'
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684475 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 11:28:02 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689797] Review Request: perl-Task-Kensho-Toolchain - Task::Kensho::Toolchain Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689797 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 11:28:50 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698264] Review Request: perl-TryCatch - First class try catch semantics for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698264 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 11:31:03 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 696527] Review Request: django-kombu - Kombu transport using the Django database as a message store
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696527 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 11:29:47 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698251] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-PPAddr - Hook into opcode execution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698251 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 11:30:45 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697425] Review Request: sound-theme-beethoven-fifth - Sound theme based on Beethoven's fifth symphony
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697425 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 11:30:23 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698576] Review Request: pal - Command line calendar that displays holidays and events
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698576 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 11:36:06 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698590] Review Request: drupal6-features - Provides feature management for Drupal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698590 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 11:40:13 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 699205] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy - Convert or render graphs as ASCII, HTML, SVG or via Graphviz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699205 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 11:40:29 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700571] Review Request: spindown - Daemon that can spindown idle disks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700571 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 11:40:45 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700833] Review Request: colorgcc - Script to colorize the terminal output of gcc, g++, cc, c++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700833 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 11:53:16 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701284] Review Request: python-py2pack - Generate distribution packages from Python packages on PyPI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701284 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 11:54:01 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701369] Review Request: ghc-json - Haskell JSON library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701369 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 11:54:46 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701343] Review Request: ghc-pandoc-types - Pandoc data structure library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701343 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 11:54:31 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701982] Review Request: osm-gps-map - A Gtk+ widget for displaying OpenStreetMap tiles
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701982 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 12:04:40 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701932] Review Request: emacs-pymacs - Emacs and Python integration framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701932 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 12:04:15 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702692] Review Request: perl-Test-CheckChanges - Check that the Changes file matches the distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702692 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 12:05:42 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702861] Review Request: libidn2 - Library to support IDNA2008 internationalized domain names
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702861 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 12:06:17 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703392] Review Request: perl-threads-lite - Actor model threading for Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703392 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 12:07:03 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703456] Review Request: perl-Scriptalicious - Make scripts more delicious to system administrators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703456 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-10 12:07:19 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697425] Review Request: sound-theme-beethoven-fifth - Sound theme based on Beethoven's fifth symphony
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697425 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697425] Review Request: sound-theme-beethoven-fifth - Sound theme based on Beethoven's fifth symphony
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697425 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-10 12:14:02 EDT --- sound-theme-beethoven-fifth-1.0-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sound-theme-beethoven-fifth-1.0-2.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 689797] Review Request: perl-Task-Kensho-Toolchain - Task::Kensho::Toolchain Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689797 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-05-10 12:14:39 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701204] Review Request: libecap - Squid interface for embedded adaptation modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701204 Spike changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Spike 2011-05-10 12:15:21 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libecap Short Description: Squid interface for embedded adaptation modules Owners: spike Branches: F-15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697425] Review Request: sound-theme-beethoven-fifth - Sound theme based on Beethoven's fifth symphony
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697425 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-10 12:18:29 EDT --- sound-theme-beethoven-fifth-1.0-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sound-theme-beethoven-fifth-1.0-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703464] Review Request: google-gson - conversion of Java objects into JSON representation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703464 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||akurt...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2011-05-10 13:14:20 EDT --- I would do this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701982] Review Request: osm-gps-map - A Gtk+ widget for displaying OpenStreetMap tiles
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701982 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701982] Review Request: osm-gps-map - A Gtk+ widget for displaying OpenStreetMap tiles
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701982 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-10 13:17:31 EDT --- osm-gps-map-0.7.3-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/osm-gps-map-0.7.3-3.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701982] Review Request: osm-gps-map - A Gtk+ widget for displaying OpenStreetMap tiles
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701982 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-10 13:20:01 EDT --- osm-gps-map-0.7.3-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/osm-gps-map-0.7.3-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701982] Review Request: osm-gps-map - A Gtk+ widget for displaying OpenStreetMap tiles
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701982 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-10 13:21:12 EDT --- osm-gps-map-0.7.3-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/osm-gps-map-0.7.3-3.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 703464] Review Request: google-gson - conversion of Java objects into JSON representation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703464
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2011-05-10
14:37:39 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[!] Rpmlint output:
google-gson.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pre -> per, ore,
pee
google-gson.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/google-gson-1.7.1/LICENSE
google-gson.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/google-gson
google-gson-javadoc.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/google-gson-javadoc-1.7.1/LICENSE
Fix the license file EOL
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x] Buildroot definition is not present
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: ASL 2.0
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[x] Package uses %global not %define
[x] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[-] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[x] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[x] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[x] pom files has correct add_to_maven_depmap call which resolves to the pom
file (use "JPP." and "JPP-" correctly)
=== Maven ===
[x] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[-] If package uses "-Dmaven.test.skip=true" explain why it was needed in a
comment
[-] If package uses custom depmap "-Dmaven2.jpp.depmap.file=*" explain why
it's needed in a comment
[x] Package uses %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x] Packages have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-utils (for
%update_maven_depmap macro)
=== Other suggestions ===
[x] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
=== Issues ===
1. Only the EOL
Quite good package for first try. I'm impressed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 561484] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561484 --- Comment #13 from Alexander Kurtakov 2011-05-10 14:51:30 EDT --- Ping, are we moving here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 695281] Review Request: perl-Devel-EnforceEncapsulation - Find access violations to blessed objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695281 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-10 14:58:12 EDT --- perl-Devel-EnforceEncapsulation-0.50-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684475] Review Request: wmblob - Dockapp which shows funny moving `blobs'
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684475 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684475] Review Request: wmblob - Dockapp which shows funny moving `blobs'
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684475 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-10 15:34:59 EDT --- wmblob-1.0.3-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wmblob-1.0.3-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684475] Review Request: wmblob - Dockapp which shows funny moving `blobs'
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684475 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-10 15:43:11 EDT --- wmblob-1.0.3-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wmblob-1.0.3-3.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698590] Review Request: drupal6-features - Provides feature management for Drupal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698590 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-10 16:01:00 EDT --- drupal6-features-1.0-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal6-features-1.0-2.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688421] Review Request: pyicu - Python extension wrapping IBM's ICU C++ libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688421 --- Comment #7 from PRABIN KUMAR DATTA 2011-05-10 16:10:53 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: pyicu Short Description: Python extension wrapping IBM's ICU C++ libraries Owners: prabindatta Branches: f14 f15 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 688421] Review Request: pyicu - Python extension wrapping IBM's ICU C++ libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688421 PRABIN KUMAR DATTA changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698067] Review Request: hiredis - A C client library for redis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698067 --- Comment #4 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-05-10 17:13:29 EDT --- Actually the upstream 0.10.0 builds just fine. Please use the .tar.gz from upstream, if it is smaller in size. Please see the spec below and apply the changes to your file. The changes basically are a corrected devel sub-package description, use of optimization flags and a simpler install path part. http://www.geofrogger.net/review/hiredis.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697425] Review Request: sound-theme-beethoven-fifth - Sound theme based on Beethoven's fifth symphony
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697425 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-10 17:16:44 EDT --- sound-theme-beethoven-fifth-1.0-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697425] Review Request: sound-theme-beethoven-fifth - Sound theme based on Beethoven's fifth symphony
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697425 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||sound-theme-beethoven-fifth ||-1.0-2.fc14 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-05-10 17:16:49 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697673] Review Request: sjinn - Simple tool for sending & receiving data from RS-232 devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697673 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-05-10 17:21:50 EDT --- sjinn-1.01-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663925] Review Request: autoconf-archive - The Autoconf Macro Archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663925 Adam Huffman changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Adam Huffman 2011-05-10 18:36:05 EDT --- Thanks for the new version. Looks fine to me now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700962] Review Request: pydf - Fully colorized df clone written in python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700962 --- Comment #5 from Adam Huffman 2011-05-10 18:40:48 EDT --- Looks okay now - thanks for the new version. Just one more thing - you should add '-p' to 'install' to preserve timestamps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 658450] Review Request: ATpy - Astronomical Tables in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658450 Sergio Pascual changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-05-10 19:24:13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 663925] Review Request: autoconf-archive - The Autoconf Macro Archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663925 --- Comment #9 from Takanori MATSUURA 2011-05-10 19:36:14 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: autoconf-archive Short Description: The Autoconf Macro Archive Owners: tmatsuu Branches: f13 f14 el5 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 696485] Review Request: django-countries - Provides a country field for Django models
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696485 Rahul Sundaram changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-05-10 20:14:41 --- Comment #6 from Rahul Sundaram 2011-05-10 20:14:41 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Arun. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
