[Bug 668820] Review Request: rubygem-rdoc - RDoc produces HTML and command-line documentation for Ruby projects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668820 --- Comment #10 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-07-11 03:41:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) I want to make change /usr/bin/rdoc to use alternatives mechanize and to give high priority on ones installed by rubygem-rdoc (if this package is going to be reviewed). Could you be more specific? Are you speaking about this [1] alternatives? Because it seems to me that easier way would be to patch the original /usr/bin/rdoc to load the RDoc gem if it is available, otherwise continue with the original RDoc. E.g. there would be typical RubyGems loader on the top of the /usr/bin/rdoc and if it fails (no RubyGems, no RDoc gem), then it would continue with the original one. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Alternatives -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720254] New: Review Request: perl-Unicode-Casing - Perl extension to override system case changing functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Unicode-Casing - Perl extension to override system case changing functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720254 Summary: Review Request: perl-Unicode-Casing - Perl extension to override system case changing functions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Unicode-Casing/perl-Unicode-Casing.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Unicode-Casing/perl-Unicode-Casing-0.07-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: This module allows overriding the system-defined character case changing functions. Any time something in its lexical scope would ordinarily call lc(), lcfirst(), uc(), or ucfirst() the corresponding user-specified function will instead be called. This applies to direct calls, and indirect calls via the \L, \l, \U, and \u escapes in double quoted strings and regular expressions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720254] Review Request: perl-Unicode-Casing - Perl extension to override system case changing functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720254 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 718165] Review Request: ibus-gucharmap - Unicode input engine (using gucharmap) for IBus platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718165 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-11 05:28:03 EDT --- ibus-gucharmap-1.4.0-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-gucharmap-1.4.0-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720267] New: Review Request: perl-smartmatch - Pluggable smart matching back-ends
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-smartmatch - Pluggable smart matching back-ends https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720267 Summary: Review Request: perl-smartmatch - Pluggable smart matching back-ends Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-smartmatch/perl-smartmatch.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-smartmatch/perl-smartmatch-0.03-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: This module allows you to override the behavior of the smart match operator (~~). use smartmatch $matcher hooks into the compiler to replace the smartmatch opcode with a call to a custom subroutine, specified either as a coderef or as a string, which will have smartmatch::engine:: prepended to it and used as the name of a package in which to find a subroutine named match. The subroutine will be called with two arguments, the values on the left and right sides of the smart match operator, and should return the result. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 718415] Review Request: sushi - A quick previewer for the Nautilus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718415 Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com 2011-07-11 05:42:32 EDT --- Add a period to the description, to make it a sentence. Looks good! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 486904] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N - I18N for Catalyst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486904 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2011-07-11 06:35:38 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N New Branches: el6 Owners: iarnell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 438119] Review Request: perl-Object-Signature - Cryptographically strong objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438119 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iarn...@gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2011-07-11 06:38:07 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Object-Signature New Branches: el6 Owners: iarnell Chris doesn't maintain his packages in EPEL, but doesn't have a problem with others doing so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 438119] Review Request: perl-Object-Signature - Cryptographically strong objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438119 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 449067] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session - Catalyst generic session plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449067 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iarn...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2011-07-11 06:39:14 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session New Branches: el6 Owners: iarnell Chris doesn't maintain his packages in EPEL, but doesn't have a problem with others doing so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719854] Review Request: rubygem-xmlparser-0.6.81-1 - Ruby bindings to the Expat XML parsing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719854
--- Comment #7 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2011-07-11 06:47:50
EDT ---
Concerning the %{SOURCE} item the following is I think better and does
work.
%prep
%setup -q -c -T
cp -p %{SOURCE0} %{gemname}-%{version}.gem
%build
mkdir -p .%{gemdir}
#gem install -V --local --install-dir $(pwd)/%{gemdir} --no-rdoc --no-ri
--force %{gemname}-%{version}.gem
gem install -V --local --install-dir $(pwd)/%{gemdir} --no-rdoc --no-ri --force
%{gemname}-%{version}.gem
I appreciate it makes no difference in reality but is consistant with the flow
of
other packages. I also see my earlier example rubygem-rake uses %{SOURCE0} in
%build but
I believe this to be wrong.
Anyway other things:
1) Requires: expat
is not needed, see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires
%global ruby_sitearch %(ruby -rrbconfig -e puts
Config::CONFIG['sitearchdir'])
%global ruby_sitelib %(ruby -rrbconfig -e puts Config::CONFIG['sitelibdir'])
is defined conditionally, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby
%{!?ruby_sitelib: %global rub
The rational being that in some future fedora version these macros will be
defined
like e.g. the python ones.
3) Your changelog is not actually being updated between these increments.
Genrally this package is looking better now, in order for me to sponsor you
which I am willing to do
can you maybe submit another package for review possibly but certainly provide
an
informal review of some other packages.
Choose a package from :
http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html
I would avoid the shaded sponsor needed ones
when you have made a review of package there which you mark as informal review
provide
a link here to it.
The other thing you can do now is submit this .src.rpm to koji as a --scratch
build.
For the sake of openness I declare also now that I work with and know you.
Steve.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720138] Review Request: django-avatar - A reusable django application for handling user avatars
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720138 Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720141] Review Request: python-grapefruit - Python module for color information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720141 Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668820] Review Request: rubygem-rdoc - RDoc produces HTML and command-line documentation for Ruby projects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668820 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC||mtas...@fedoraproject.org Resolution|WONTFIX | Keywords||Reopened -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668820] Review Request: rubygem-rdoc - RDoc produces HTML and command-line documentation for Ruby projects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668820 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-11 07:23:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) (In reply to comment #9) I want to make change /usr/bin/rdoc to use alternatives mechanize and to give high priority on ones installed by rubygem-rdoc (if this package is going to be reviewed). Could you be more specific? Are you speaking about this [1] alternatives? Yes. Because it seems to me that easier way would be to patch the original /usr/bin/rdoc to load the RDoc gem if it is available, otherwise continue with the original RDoc. E.g. there would be typical RubyGems loader on the top of the /usr/bin/rdoc and if it fails (no RubyGems, no RDoc gem), then it would continue with the original one. In this way, people will have to once remove rubygem-rdoc every time they want to use the original rdoc and it seems unpleasant to me. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Alternatives -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668820] Review Request: rubygem-rdoc - RDoc produces HTML and command-line documentation for Ruby projects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668820 --- Comment #12 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-07-11 07:46:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) In this way, people will have to once remove rubygem-rdoc every time they want to use the original rdoc and it seems unpleasant to me. Unpleasant, but IMO: 1) This is the way how it will work if you build/install your own Ruby, so I think Rubyists are used to it. Even now you loose the original rdoc executable once you install the gem version of RDoc. 2) I don't think there will be high demand in using original RDoc once there is installed the gem version. Are you aware about any specific reason why somebody would like to? 3) With RubyGems, there is always possibility to choose the executed version, e.g. you can call rdoc _3.6_ --version if you have installed RDoc 3.8 and 3.6 to use RDoc 3.6, so we can do something similar, i.e. rdoc _system_ or rdoc _1.0.1_ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720323] New: Review Request: perl-Module-Runtime - Runtime module handling
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Runtime - Runtime module handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720323 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Runtime - Runtime module handling Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Module-Runtime/perl-Module-Runtime.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Module-Runtime/perl-Module-Runtime-0.008-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: The functions exported by this module deal with runtime handling of Perl modules, which are normally handled at compile time. Notice for packager: Target to F16--14 due to perl-smartmatch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720327] New: Review Request: perl-DynaLoader-Functions - Deconstructed dynamic C library loading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DynaLoader-Functions - Deconstructed dynamic C library loading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720327 Summary: Review Request: perl-DynaLoader-Functions - Deconstructed dynamic C library loading Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-DynaLoader-Functions/perl-DynaLoader-Functions.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-DynaLoader-Functions/perl-DynaLoader-Functions-0.000-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: This module provides a function-based interface to dynamic loading as used by Perl. Some details of dynamic loading are very platform-dependent, so correct use of these functions requires the programmer to be mindful of the space of platform variations. Notice for packager: Target to F16--14 due to perl-smartmatch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720323] Review Request: perl-Module-Runtime - Runtime module handling
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720323 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||720327 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720327] Review Request: perl-DynaLoader-Functions - Deconstructed dynamic C library loading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720327 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||720323 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719332] Review Request: kamera - Digital camera support for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719332 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jrez...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jrez...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720333] New: Review Request: perl-Devel-CallChecker - Custom op checking attached to subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-CallChecker - Custom op checking attached to subroutines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720333 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-CallChecker - Custom op checking attached to subroutines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Devel-CallChecker/perl-Devel-CallChecker.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Devel-CallChecker/perl-Devel-CallChecker-0.003-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: This module makes some new features of the Perl 5.14.0 C API available to XS modules running on older versions of Perl. The features are centered around the function cv_set_call_checker, which allows XS code to attach a magical annotation to a Perl subroutine, resulting in resolvable calls to that subroutine being mutated at compile time by arbitrary C code. This module makes cv_set_call_checker and several supporting functions available. (It is possible to achieve the effect of cv_set_call_checker from XS code on much earlier Perl versions, but it is painful to achieve without the centralized facility.) Notice for packager: Target to F16--14 due to perl-smartmatch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720333] Review Request: perl-Devel-CallChecker - Custom op checking attached to subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720333 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||720327 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720327] Review Request: perl-DynaLoader-Functions - Deconstructed dynamic C library loading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720327 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||720333 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719332] Review Request: kamera - Digital camera support for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719332 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2011-07-11 08:23:50 EDT --- Name: ok Summary: ok License: ok URL: https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdegraphics/kamera would be better Source: ok (md5sum 4fd086610c958f359f6b22fcfa6fce3e) BRs: ok Conflicts: ok, previously in kdegraphics Description: ok Macro usage: consistent Docs: ok Simple review, know to work as it was part of kregraphics previously. rpmlint kamera-4.6.90-1.fc15.src.rpm kamera.src: W: invalid-url Source0: ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/4.6.90/src/kamera-4.6.90.tar.bz2 urlopen error ftp error: 550 Failed to change directory. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ok, should be unstable but it does not have any sense to change it with every prerelease as tarballs are uploaded in cache... APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719334] Review Request: kcolorchooser - A color chooser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719334 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jrez...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jrez...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 718415] Review Request: sushi - A quick previewer for the Nautilus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718415 Elad Alfassa el...@doom.co.il changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Elad Alfassa el...@doom.co.il 2011-07-11 08:32:19 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: sushi Short Description: A quick previewer for the Nautilus Owners: elad Branches: InitialCC: -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720267] Review Request: perl-smartmatch - Pluggable smart matching back-ends
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720267 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||720339 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720339] Review Request: perl-smartmatch-engine-core - Default smartmatch implementation from 5.10---5.14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720339 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||720267, 720333 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720333] Review Request: perl-Devel-CallChecker - Custom op checking attached to subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720333 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||720339 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720267] Review Request: perl-smartmatch - Pluggable smart matching back-ends
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720267 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2011-07-11 08:39:51 EDT --- Notice for packager: Target to F16--14 to bring better smartmatch operator to all users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719334] Review Request: kcolorchooser - A color chooser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719334 --- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2011-07-11 08:39:27 EDT --- Name: ok Summary: ok License: not ok! the correct one is BSD URL: please use https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdegraphics/kcolorchooser Sources: ok (md5sum 71fe4b550dc11fcbc8c57e9a6457d5f6) BRs: ok Conflicts: ok Description: ok Macros usage consistent: ok Desktop file validated: ok Icon cache updated: ok No docs: license file should be included, would be great to poke upstream to distribute a standard set of READMEs and LICENSEs for splitted packages Please fix the license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720339] New: Review Request: perl-smartmatch-engine-core - Default smartmatch implementation from 5.10---5.14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-smartmatch-engine-core - Default smartmatch implementation from 5.10---5.14 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720339 Summary: Review Request: perl-smartmatch-engine-core - Default smartmatch implementation from 5.10---5.14 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-smartmatch-engine-core/perl-smartmatch-engine-core.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-smartmatch-engine-core/perl-smartmatch-engine-core-0.02-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: This module implements the existing smart matching algorithm from perl 5.14, as a module. It has a pure perl implementation of the algorithm (which can be requested by setting $smartmatch::engine::core::USE_PP to a true value before use-ing this engine), but by default it uses a C implementation which should be identical to the algorithm in 5.14 - this module uses some new compiler hooks to turn calls to the engine's match function into a custom op-code, which is implemented by a copy of the smart match code from perl 5.14. Notice for packager: Target to F16--14 due to perl-smartmatch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719335] Review Request: kgamma - A monitor calibration tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719335 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jrez...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jrez...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719332] Review Request: kamera - Digital camera support for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719332 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-07-11 08:49:36 EDT --- Thanks. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: kamera Short Description: Digikam camera support for KDE Owners: than rdieter jreznik kkofler ltinkl rnovacek rrix Branches: f15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693950] Review Request: yagf - Graphical front-end for cuneiform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693950 --- Comment #4 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich kr...@land.ru 2011-07-11 08:48:27 EDT --- What is wrong with locales? Qt *.qm files. Locales are work. Permitions are 644. There are not handled with %find_lang script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719334] Review Request: kcolorchooser - A color chooser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719334 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-07-11 08:48:10 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdegraphics/kcolorchooser.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdegraphics/kcolorchooser-4.6.90-3.fc15.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Jul 11 2011 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org 4.6.90-3 - License: BSD - update URL * Wed Jul 06 2011 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org 4.6.90-2 - fix Source0 URL - Conflicts: kdegraphics 7:4.6.90-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719335] Review Request: kgamma - A monitor calibration tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719335 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2011-07-11 08:53:19 EDT --- Name: ok Summary: ok License: ok URL: please use https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdegraphics/kgamma Source: ok (md5sum 15e5d17a4b6bb157d0319d74058fb3f3) BRs: ok Conflicts: ok, previsously found in kdegraphics Description: ok Macros usage consistent: ok Docs: ok (but same comment as for kcolorchooser) Desktop file validation: not needed, KCM module rpmlint kgamma-4.6.90-1.fc15.src.rpm kgamma.src: W: invalid-url Source0: ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/4.6.90/src/kgamma-4.6.90.tar.bz2 urlopen error ftp error: 550 Failed to change directory. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Does not make sense for prerelease to change URL. Sources in cache. Fairly simple package, previously part of kdegraphics and known to work. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719335] Review Request: kgamma - A monitor calibration tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719335 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-07-11 08:58:49 EDT --- Thanks. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: kgamma Short Description: A monitor calibration tool Owners: than rdieter jreznik kkofler ltinkl rnovacek rrix Branches: f15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713320] Review Request: oz - Library and utilities for automated guest OS installs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713320 --- Comment #27 from Chris Lalancette clala...@redhat.com 2011-07-11 09:32:19 EDT --- Thanks Pádraig, I've taken ownership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719337] Review Request: kolourpaint - An easy-to-use paint program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719337 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jrez...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jrez...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 713159] Review Request: rubygem-rbvmomi - Ruby interface to the VMware vSphere API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713159 --- Comment #6 from Francesco Vollero fvoll...@redhat.com 2011-07-11 09:47:03 EDT --- Hi Vit Ondruch, I am submitting the new version of spec file with the suggestions/bugfix you suggested. http://crucco.razorinc.org/fedora/rubygem-rbvmomi-1.2.3.spec http://crucco.razorinc.org/fedora/rubygem-rbvmomi-1.2.3-2.fc14.src.rpm Let me know if it's all you need. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719324] Review Request: libkdcraw - A C++ interface around LibRaw library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719324 --- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-07-11 09:48:43 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdegraphics/libkdcraw.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdegraphics/libkdcraw-4.6.90-5.fc15.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Jul 11 2011 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org 4.6.90-5 - License: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2 and GPLv3+ - Provides: bundled(LibRaw) * Sun Jul 10 2011 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org 4.6.90-4 - fix URL - fix scriptlets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719337] Review Request: kolourpaint - An easy-to-use paint program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719337 --- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2011-07-11 09:55:31 EDT --- Name: ok Summary: ok License: ?, LGPLv2 but most of the code is under BSD license, please fix or comment, thanks URL: please use https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdegraphics/kolourpaint Source: ok (md5sum 71fe4b550dc11fcbc8c57e9a6457d5f6) BRs: ok Conflicts: ok, previously kdegraphics Description: ok Desktop file vailidity: ok Icon cache updated: ok Ldconfig post: ok Docs: ok Macros used constantly: ok Please fix or comment licensing issue, does LGPL affects the BSD code when linked together, so resulting lib is GPL/LGPL one? Otherwise simple package and it's ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720356] New: Review Request: rubygem-rack-ssl - Force SSL/TLS in your app
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rack-ssl - Force SSL/TLS in your app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720356 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rack-ssl - Force SSL/TLS in your app Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vondr...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-rack-ssl.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-rack-ssl-1.3.2-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Rack middleware to force SSL/TLS. Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3190854 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693950] Review Request: yagf - Graphical front-end for cuneiform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693950 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2011-07-11 09:55:51 EDT --- the permission fixes and dos2unix calls belong into the %prep section. (You want to fix the sources before compilation, not after compilation). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719342] Review Request: okular - A document viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719342 nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alekc...@googlemail.com --- Comment #1 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2011-07-11 10:06:48 EDT --- URL can be http://okular.kde.org/ or http://www.kde.org/applications/graphics/okular/. Maybe first is preferred. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719337] Review Request: kolourpaint - An easy-to-use paint program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719337 nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alekc...@googlemail.com --- Comment #2 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2011-07-11 10:03:23 EDT --- Maybe URL http://www.kde.org/applications/graphics/kolourpaint/ will be more useful than https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdegraphics/kolourpaint ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 693950] Review Request: yagf - Graphical front-end for cuneiform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693950 --- Comment #6 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2011-07-11 10:08:21 EDT --- But they should be handled with %find_lang. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719337] Review Request: kolourpaint - An easy-to-use paint program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719337 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-07-11 10:10:09 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdegraphics/kolourpaint.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdegraphics/kolourpaint-4.6.90-3.fc15.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Jul 11 2011 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org 4.6.90-3 - License: BSD, -libs: License: LGPLv2 - fix URL * Wed Jul 06 2011 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org 4.6.90-2 - fix Source0 URL - Conflicts: kdegraphics 7:4.6.90-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 530684] Review Request: nordugrid-arc - Advanced Resource Connector Grid Middleware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530684 --- Comment #10 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2011-07-11 10:12:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) New version: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/nordugrid-arc.spec http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/nordugrid-arc-1.0.0-3.fc15.src.rpm rpmlint: nordugrid-arc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US middleware - middle ware, middle-ware, middleweight The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. nordugrid-arc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US organisation - organization, organist, sanitation The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. nordugrid-arc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US analyse - analyses, analyst, analyze The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. Fix 2 and 3, skip 1. Done. nordugrid-arc-aris.noarch: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/grid-infosys While your daemon is running, you have to put a lock file in /var/lock/subsys/. To see an example, look at this directory on your machine and examine the corresponding init scripts. This one is a false error. The init script call another script and this scripts uses the subsys. So it looks like most of the problems here relate to doc/man pages and init script names. One suggestion, since as of F-15 we've switched to systemd by default, might you not want to create unit files and not provide the sysv init scripts? Several of the missing man pages have been added to upstream's svn and will be part of the next update. There is also a separate doc package that contains documentation. (See the review at bug #704835.) Converting to systemd unit files is in my plans, but it is not trivial, so it is not something I can do immediately. Especially the grid-infosys script needs some care - that one should probably be split into three separate unit files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668820] Review Request: rubygem-rdoc - RDoc produces HTML and command-line documentation for Ruby projects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668820 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-11 10:13:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) (In reply to comment #11) In this way, people will have to once remove rubygem-rdoc every time they want to use the original rdoc and it seems unpleasant to me. Unpleasant, but IMO: 1) This is the way how it will work if you build/install your own Ruby, Sorry but I cannot figure out what you are saying here. so I think Rubyists are used to it. Even now you loose the original rdoc executable once you install the gem version of RDoc. I only talk about what happens on current Fedora packaging or rpms so I just ignore it when people install gem files outside Fedora's rpm by themselves. 2) I don't think there will be high demand in using original RDoc once there is installed the gem version. Are you aware about any specific reason why somebody would like to? I don't recall it shortly, however other people may want. 3) With RubyGems, there is always possibility to choose the executed version, e.g. you can call rdoc _3.6_ --version if you have installed RDoc 3.8 and 3.6 to use RDoc 3.6, Again this won't happen on Fedora (please base your talk on Fedora's rpms or Fedora's packaging) so we can do something similar, i.e. rdoc _system_ or rdoc _1.0.1_ I don't understand your logic here. - If you want to do rdoc _system_ or so, perhaps we need another patch, and I don't want to do such mess method. - And specifying rdoc _system_ or so will also require another patches on packages which has /usr/bin/rdoc as BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719324] Review Request: libkdcraw - A C++ interface around LibRaw library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719324 nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added QAContact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |alekc...@googlemail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #10 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2011-07-11 10:29:40 EDT --- rpmlint output for ibkdcraw-4.6.90-5 rpms: libkdcraw.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libkdcraw-4.6.90/LICENSE.LGPL libkdcraw.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/libkdcraw-4.6.90/LICENSE.LGPL libkdcraw.src:25: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(LibRaw) libkdcraw.src:27: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(LibRaw-demosaic-pack-GPL2) libkdcraw.src:28: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(LibRaw-demosaic-pack-GPL3) libkdcraw.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libkdcraw-4.6.90/LICENSE.LGPL libkdcraw.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/libkdcraw-4.6.90/LICENSE.LGPL libkdcraw-devel.i686: W: no-documentation libkdcraw-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 7 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719324] Review Request: libkdcraw - A C++ interface around LibRaw library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719324 nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora_requires_release_not ||e+ --- Comment #11 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2011-07-11 10:35:25 EDT --- rpmlint errors not serious and can be fixed later. Package and spec names are fine, description is fine now, license GPLv2+ and LGPLv2 and GPLv3+ is actual license used in libkdcraw and bundled libraw sources, Requires in devel package fine, scriptlets are fine, package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3190903 Package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719324] Review Request: libkdcraw - A C++ interface around LibRaw library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719324 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-07-11 10:45:21 EDT --- Thanks. What's the purpose of marking fedora_requires_release_note flag? New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libkdcraw Short Description: A C++ interface around LibRaw library Owners: than rdieter jreznik kkofler ltinkl rnovacek rrix Branches: f15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719324] Review Request: libkdcraw - A C++ interface around LibRaw library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719324 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|alekc...@googlemail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 718415] Review Request: sushi - A quick previewer for the Nautilus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718415 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-11 11:00:20 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 449067] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session - Catalyst generic session plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449067 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-11 10:59:05 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 438119] Review Request: perl-Object-Signature - Cryptographically strong objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438119 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-11 10:58:18 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 486904] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N - I18N for Catalyst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486904 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-11 10:59:35 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719324] Review Request: libkdcraw - A C++ interface around LibRaw library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719324 nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |fedora_requires_release_not | |e+ | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719332] Review Request: kamera - Digital camera support for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719332 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-11 11:02:37 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719335] Review Request: kgamma - A monitor calibration tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719335 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-11 11:03:10 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720138] Review Request: django-avatar - A reusable django application for handling user avatars
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720138 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-11 11:07:55 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720141] Review Request: python-grapefruit - Python module for color information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720141 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-11 11:08:40 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719323] Review Request: libkipi - Common plugin infrastructure for KDE image applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719323 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-11 11:10:33 EDT --- Misformed request, what sort of intervention are you referring to? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720411] New: Review Request: OpenImageIO - Library for reading and writing images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: OpenImageIO - Library for reading and writing images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720411 Summary: Review Request: OpenImageIO - Library for reading and writing images Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hobbes1...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/OpenImageIO/OpenImageIO.spec SRPM URL: http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/OpenImageIO/OpenImageIO-0.10.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: OpenImageIO is a library for reading and writing images, and a bunch of related classes, utilities, and applications. Main features include: - Extremely simple but powerful ImageInput and ImageOutput APIs for reading and writing 2D images that is format agnostic. - Format plugins for TIFF, JPEG/JFIF, OpenEXR, PNG, HDR/RGBE, Targa, JPEG-2000, DPX, Cineon, FITS, BMP, ICO, RMan Zfile, Softimage PIC, DDS, SGI, PNM/PPM/PGM/PBM, Field3d. - An ImageCache class that transparently manages a cache so that it can access truly vast amounts of image data. - A really nice image viewer, iv, also based on OpenImageIO classes (and so will work with any formats for which plugins are available). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 668820] Review Request: rubygem-rdoc - RDoc produces HTML and command-line documentation for Ruby projects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668820 --- Comment #14 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com 2011-07-11 11:11:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) ad 1) I was speaking about users who does not use RPM Ruby, e.g. Ruby installed into /opt or using RVM. They will get overridden their default rdoc executable by rubygems one and they don't care. ad 3) Patch or alternatives, both methods are messy IMO. From my POV, the users expects that they will use the gem version of RDoc as soon as they install the gem. The question is how to fulfill the expectation the best. Also don't forget that any solution we choose will present precedent for future. So again, could you please shed more light on your alternatives proposal? What version will be default? How the defaults will change, how the user will work with them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719324] Review Request: libkdcraw - A C++ interface around LibRaw library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719324 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-11 11:15:34 EDT --- pkgdb says it already exists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719327] Review Request: libksane - SANE Library interface for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719327 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-11 11:14:38 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). nucleo, please take ownership of review tickets you're working on. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720411] Review Request: OpenImageIO - Library for reading and writing images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720411 --- Comment #1 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com 2011-07-11 11:16:38 EDT --- Rpmlint output: (comments inline) $ rpmlint OpenImageIO-*.rpm OpenImageIO.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US plugins - plug ins, plug-ins, plugging OpenImageIO.src: W: invalid-url Source0: https://download.github.com/OpenImageIO-oiio-Release-0.10.0-12-g8055b0f.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found I have not been able to find a permanent download link for github as it appears to generate the archives on the fly and then the link expires sometime later (1 hr). OpenImageIO.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US plugins - plug ins, plug-ins, plugging OpenImageIO.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/OpenImageIO.so OpenImageIO.so()(64bit) I looked at filtering this but it didn't seem to fit the guideline requirements. 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719325] Review Request: libkexiv2 - An Exiv2 wrapper library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719325 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-11 11:16:20 EDT --- pkgdb says this already exists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720040] Review Request: pugixml - A light-weight C++ XML processing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720040 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||720411 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720411] Review Request: OpenImageIO - Library for reading and writing images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720411 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||720040 --- Comment #2 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com 2011-07-11 11:18:30 EDT --- OpenImageIO bundles pugixml which has been removed from the SRPM and review request 720040 submitted to correct this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719327] Review Request: libksane - SANE Library interface for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719327 nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|alekc...@googlemail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 675050] Review Request: cloudfs - Cloud Filesystem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675050 --- Comment #17 from Kaleb KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com 2011-07-11 11:32:00 EDT --- New Spec and SRPM addresses all the issues in C14 above including as much of the rpmlint noise as is practical. For now I don't propose to fix the remaining rpmlint 'noise issues'. Spec URL: http://cloudfs.org/dist/0.7/cloudfs.spec SRPM URL: http://cloudfs.org/dist/0.7/cloudfs-0.7-2.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720435] New: Review Request: epson-inkjet-printer-escpr - Drivers for Epson inkjet printers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: epson-inkjet-printer-escpr - Drivers for Epson inkjet printers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720435 Summary: Review Request: epson-inkjet-printer-escpr - Drivers for Epson inkjet printers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.leht...@iki.fi QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4-1.src.rpm Description: This package contains drivers for Epson Inkjet printers that use the New Generation Epson Printer Control Language. For a detailed list of supported printers, please refer to http://avasys.jp/english/linux_e/ rpmlint output: epson-inkjet-printer-escpr.src:73: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/cups/filter/epson-* epson-inkjet-printer-escpr.src: W: invalid-url Source0: epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4-1lsb3.2.tar.gz epson-inkjet-printer-escpr.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/cups/filter/epson-escpr ['/usr/lib64'] epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4/lib/escpr_sp.h epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4/lib/escpr_cmd.c epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4/src/str.c epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4/src/csv.h epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4/lib/escpr_osdep.h epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4/lib/escpr_def.h epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4/src/filter.c epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4/src/pipsDef.h epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4/lib/escpr_osdep.c epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4/lib/escpr_api.c epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4/src/optBase.h epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4/src/wrapper.c epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4/src/pips.h epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4/lib/escpr_rle.c epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4/lib/escpr_sp.c epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4/src/err.h epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4/src/mem.c epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4/src/err.c epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4/src/def.h epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4/src/csv.c epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 22 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 710995] Review Request: kradview - An image viewer oriented to images obtained by X-Ray machines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710995 --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-07-11 11:57:42 EDT --- Hello, Updated: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/kradview/kradview-1.1.0-3.fc15.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/kradview/kradview.spec Thanks, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 462254] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap - FastMmap session storage backend
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462254 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-11 12:01:17 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720141] Review Request: python-grapefruit - Python module for color information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720141 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-11 12:24:58 EDT --- python-grapefruit-0.1a3-1.20110710svn31.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-grapefruit-0.1a3-1.20110710svn31.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720141] Review Request: python-grapefruit - Python module for color information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720141 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720447] New: Review Request: python-unidecode - US-ASCII transliterations of Unicode text
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-unidecode - US-ASCII transliterations of Unicode text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720447 Summary: Review Request: python-unidecode - US-ASCII transliterations of Unicode text Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/python-unidecode.spec SRPM URL: http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/python-unidecode-0.04.7-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: description here It often happens that you have non-Roman text data in Unicode, but you can't display it -- usually because you're trying to show it to a user via an application that doesn't support Unicode, or because the fonts you need aren't accessible. You could represent the Unicode characters as ??? or BA A0q0..., but that's nearly useless to the user who actually wants to read what the text says. What Unidecode provides is a function, 'unidecode(...)' that takes Unicode data and tries to represent it in ASCII characters (i.e., the universally displayable characters between 0x00 and 0x7F). The representation is almost always an attempt at transliteration -- i.e., conveying, in Roman letters, the pronunciation expressed by the text in some other writing system. For example 'unidecode(uu5317u4EB0)' returns 'Bei Jing'. This is a Python port of Text::Unidecode Perl module by Sean M. Burke. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 694139] Review Request: openvas-gsd - Greenbone Security Desktop client application for OpenVAS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694139 --- Comment #4 from Michal Ambroz re...@seznam.cz 2011-07-11 12:33:35 EDT --- Hi, once again thanks for comments. Sorry for delay - I am fighting the deprecated gnutls code in openvas-libraries to be able to update whole suite to recent versions. You can drop the defattr line, if you don't plan to package to EPEL4. I do plan for EPEL as the other packages of openvas do. Why do you set 755 for an icon? This is just wrong should be 644. Michal Ambroz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719323] Review Request: libkipi - Common plugin infrastructure for KDE image applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719323 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-07-11 12:54:29 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: libkipi Short Description: Common plugin infrastructure for KDE image applications Owners: than rdieter jreznik kkofler ltinkl rnovacek rrix Branches: f15 3 things needed: 1. updated owners 2. f15 branch 3. mark package not deprecated in pkgdb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719325] Review Request: libkexiv2 - An Exiv2 wrapper library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719325 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-07-11 12:55:46 EDT --- doh, forgot about that, let's try change request instead then. fyi, this needs also to be marked not deprecated. Package Change Request == Package Name: libkexiv2 Short Description: An Exiv2 wrapper library Owners: than rdieter jreznik kkofler ltinkl rnovacek rrix Branches: f15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719324] Review Request: libkdcraw - A C++ interface around LibRaw library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719324 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-07-11 12:56:25 EDT --- doh, forgot about that, let's try change request instead then. fyi, this needs also to be marked not deprecated. Package Change Request == Package Name: libkdcraw Short Description: A C++ interface around LibRaw library Owners: than rdieter jreznik kkofler ltinkl rnovacek rrix Branches: f15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719332] Review Request: kamera - Digital camera support for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719332 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-07-11 13:01:09 --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-07-11 13:01:09 EDT --- imported. builds pending review of other kdegraphics split packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720138] Review Request: django-avatar - A reusable django application for handling user avatars
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720138 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-11 13:03:49 EDT --- django-avatar-2.0a1-2.20110709git097ed8.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-avatar-2.0a1-2.20110709git097ed8.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720138] Review Request: django-avatar - A reusable django application for handling user avatars
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720138 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719335] Review Request: kgamma - A monitor calibration tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719335 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-07-11 13:03:22 --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-07-11 13:03:22 EDT --- imported. builds pending review of other kdegraphics split packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719323] Review Request: libkipi - Common plugin infrastructure for KDE image applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719323 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-11 13:12:34 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719324] Review Request: libkdcraw - A C++ interface around LibRaw library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719324 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-11 13:13:44 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719324] Review Request: libkdcraw - A C++ interface around LibRaw library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719324 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@jcomserv.net --- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-11 13:14:50 EDT --- Did f15 branch, can't do 1 or 3, you'll need to file a rel-eng trac. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719325] Review Request: libkexiv2 - An Exiv2 wrapper library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719325 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-11 13:15:20 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719323] Review Request: libkipi - Common plugin infrastructure for KDE image applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719323 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@jcomserv.net --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-11 13:13:57 EDT --- Created f15 branch, I can't do 1 or 3, you'll need to file a rel-eng trac. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719325] Review Request: libkexiv2 - An Exiv2 wrapper library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719325 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@jcomserv.net --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-07-11 13:17:33 EDT --- Did f15 branch, can't do 1 and 3, you'll need to file a rel-eng trac. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719337] Review Request: kolourpaint - An easy-to-use paint program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719337 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2011-07-11 13:24:49 EDT --- Thanks Rex, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719334] Review Request: kcolorchooser - A color chooser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719334 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com 2011-07-11 13:23:16 EDT --- Thanks Rex, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715180] Review Request: freemat - A free environment for rapid engineering, scientific prototyping and data processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715180 --- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2011-07-11 13:02:31 EDT --- Hi! [ankur@ankur SRPMS]$ rpmlint ../SPECS/freemat.spec freemat-20110620-0.3.svn4185.fc15.src.rpm /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm | sed '/incorrect-fsf-address/d' ../SPECS/freemat.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: freemat.tar.gz freemat.src: W: invalid-url Source0: freemat.tar.gz freemat.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary FreeMat freemat.src: W: invalid-url Source0: freemat.tar.gz freemat-data.i686: W: no-documentation freemat-data.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/FreeMat-4.1/toolbox/test/addArrays.c 6 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 47 errors, 6 warnings. 4.1 has also been released iirc. Googling for the version brings up quite a few packages. http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/freemat/freemat-20110620-0.3.svn4185.fc15.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/freemat/freemat.spec * Mon Jul 11 2011 Ankur Sinha ankursinha AT fedoraproject DOT org - 20110620-0.3.svn4185 - fix up BRs - fix up description - fix versioning - split the package Thanks! Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 719337] Review Request: kolourpaint - An easy-to-use paint program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719337 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-07-11 13:31:41 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: kolourpaint Short Description: An easy-to-use paint program Owners: than rdieter jreznik kkofler ltinkl rnovacek rrix Branches: f15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
