[Bug 761094] Review Request: asn1c - An ASN.1 Compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761094 Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(nathaniel@natemcc ||allum.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 765652] Review Request: bvi - Display-oriented editor for binary files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765652 Matthieu Saulnier casper.le.fan...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #2 from Matthieu Saulnier casper.le.fan...@gmail.com 2011-12-09 04:55:23 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/bvi-debuginfo-1.3.2-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm bvi-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Don't submit packages without any unjustified rpmlint error. Okay, so I can't fix it now, I've contacted the developper about this error. bmore.help is not a documentation file, it contains the help summary for bmore, displayed using the 'h' key. As a result, this file can't be considered to be as an optional one, you can't move it where you want without any consequence. Please explain *why* you want to move this file elsewhere. I fixed an other rpmlint warning by this way, but I didn't seen help function was broken. $ rpmlint *.rpm bvi.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bmore - bore, more, b more bvi.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib bvi.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/bvi.1.gz 2: warning: macro `''' not defined bvi.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/bvi.1.gz 36: warning: macro `--' not defined bvi.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/bvi.1.gz 48: warning: macro `M' not defined bvi.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/bvi.1.gz 48: warning: macro `S' not defined bvi.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/bvi.1.gz 48: warning: macro `N' not defined bvi.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/bvi.1.gz 48: warning: macro `T' not defined bvi.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/bmore.1.gz 56: warning: macro `L'' not defined bvi.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/bmore.1.gz 56: warning: macro `R'' not defined bvi.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/bvi-1.3.2/COPYING bvi.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bview bvi.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bvedit bvi-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 12 warnings. bvi.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib That was the rpmlint warning I tryed to fix by moving the help file. It is currently located here: -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib64/bmore.help I don't know how to move it without break help function. Latest release: Spec URL: http://fantom.fedorapeople.org/bvi.spec SRPM URL: http://fantom.fedorapeople.org/bvi-1.3.2-2.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 752169] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-zukitwo - The Zukitwo GTK and GNOME Shell theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752169 --- Comment #8 from Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk 2011-12-09 05:14:34 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) (In reply to comment #2) In my opinion, having an only package would be better, because * the GTK themes and the Gnome Shell theme have been created explicitly to be used together; * anyway, one can still choose to apply the GTK themes or the Gnome Shell theme alone through Gnome Tweak Tool, if he prefers. But this is only a beginner's point of view. If other reasons exist to prefer creating separate subpackages, please let me know. You should *really* split this package, as justified here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744952#c5 The gtk2/gtk3/metacity theme can be used independently each other, and outside GNOME. You should also rename your SRPM name, as explained here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744952#c8 I agree, you split the gtk parts up in sub packages and let the gnome3 theme require them, then it will be possible to use them outside gnome -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 752169] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-zukitwo - The Zukitwo GTK and GNOME Shell theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752169 --- Comment #9 from Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com 2011-12-09 05:43:43 EST --- This is an example of how the splitting can be achieved: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/zukitwo/zukitwo.spec By the way, you should *really* ask uipstream to set versions on its themes archive. You can't track new versions of the theme otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 755890] Review Request: snap A modular cross-platform system backup/restore utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890 Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: Snap A |Review Request: snap A |modular cross-platform |modular cross-platform |system backup/restore |system backup/restore |utility |utility Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #25 from Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2011-12-09 06:30:51 EST --- My apologies. It is acceptable to edit the summary correct? (which I have done). I would prefer the lower case version. Thank you. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: snap Short Description: A modular cross-platform system backup/restoration utility Owners: mmorsi Branches: f15 f16 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 765652] Review Request: bvi - Display-oriented editor for binary files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765652 --- Comment #3 from Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com 2011-12-09 06:45:50 EST --- Created attachment 544493 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=544493 Disable binary stripping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 765652] Review Request: bvi - Display-oriented editor for binary files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765652
--- Comment #4 from Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com 2011-12-09
06:48:14 EST ---
Created attachment 544497
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=544497
Install help file in %{_datadir}, to comply with the FHS
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 765652] Review Request: bvi - Display-oriented editor for binary files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765652
--- Comment #5 from Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com 2011-12-09
06:49:19 EST ---
I've just attached two patch:
- the first one to solve the debuginfo issue;
- the second one to install the help file in %{_datadir}/%{name}, to comply
with the FHS.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757314] Review Request: ipgrab - A verbose packet sniffer for hosts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757314
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
--- Comment #1 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2011-12-09 07:55:09 EST
---
Doesn't build on my machine:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/ucd-snmp
-I/usr/include/ucd-snmp -I/usr/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wformat -O2
-g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c snmp.c
In file included from snmp.c:43:0:
/usr/include/ucd-snmp/asn1.h:7:2: error: #error Please update your headers or
configure using --enable-ucd-snmp-compatibility
In file included from snmp.c:47:0:
/usr/include/ucd-snmp/snmp.h:7:2: error: #error Please update your headers or
configure using --enable-ucd-snmp-compatibility
make[2]: *** [snmp.o] Error 1
I think this is related to having Net-SNMP instead of UCD.
You can drop rm -rf %{buildroot}
Probably re-phrase this passage of the description: except that I've made an
effort. There are also two spaces before the next sentence.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 755890] Review Request: snap A modular cross-platform system backup/restore utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890 --- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2011-12-09 08:12:05 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 765802] New: Review Request: indimpc - A minimalist MPD client with support for the gnome-shell and multimedia keys
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: indimpc - A minimalist MPD client with support for the gnome-shell and multimedia keys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765802 Summary: Review Request: indimpc - A minimalist MPD client with support for the gnome-shell and multimedia keys Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sanjay.an...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/indimpc/indimpc.spec SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/indimpc/indimpc-0-0.20111209.git.fc17.src.rpm Description: This is a minimalist MPD client with support for the gnome-shell indication system and multimedia keys. It is easily configurable and can launch a more featured client when needed. It depends on: python-dbus (dbus-python in some systems) python-notify python-mpd python-keybinder (not needed if using Gnome) For its normal operation, indimpc requires a notifications daemon, hopefully with support for action-icons, body-markup and persistence (gnome-shell is recommended). If there is no instance of gnome-settings-daemon running, it will fallback to python-keybinder to grab the multimedia keys. --- rpmlint output: [ankur@ankur SRPMS]$ rpmlint indimpc-0-0.20111209.git.fc16.src.rpm /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm ../SPECS/indimpc.spec indimpc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dbus - dubs, bus, buds indimpc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpd - mod, mp, pd indimpc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US keybinder - key binder, key-binder, bindery indimpc.src: W: strange-permission fmoralesc-indimpc-2313a1a.tar.gz 0640L indimpc.src: W: invalid-url Source0: fmoralesc-indimpc-2313a1a.tar.gz indimpc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dbus - dubs, bus, buds indimpc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpd - mod, mp, pd indimpc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US keybinder - key binder, key-binder, bindery indimpc.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary indimpc indimpc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dbus - dubs, bus, buds indimpc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpd - mod, mp, pd indimpc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US keybinder - key binder, key-binder, bindery indimpc.src: W: strange-permission fmoralesc-indimpc-2313a1a.tar.gz 0640L indimpc.src: W: invalid-url Source0: fmoralesc-indimpc-2313a1a.tar.gz ../SPECS/indimpc.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: fmoralesc-indimpc-2313a1a.tar.gz 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 15 warnings. [ankur@ankur SRPMS]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 756443] Review Request: cagraph - A PyGTK widget for plotting charts and graphs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756443
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
--- Comment #1 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2011-12-09 08:27:11 EST
---
According to the files, license is GPLv3+, not GPLv3
rm -rf %{buildroot}/*, clean section and buildroot definition are not
necessary, if you're not aiming for EPEL 5:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#BuildRoot_tag
Defining sitearch or sitelib is only necessary for EPEL 5 as well, see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python
The if clause for Suse is no use in Fedora. I guess you're trying to keep a
single spec for Suse and Fedora. I don't know Suse's guidelines, but that might
not work.
Don't install the documentation on your own. Only use %doc in the files
section: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Documentation
FSF postal address is wrong:
[makerpm@desktop SPECS]$ rpmlint
/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/cagraph-1.2-7.fc16.noarch.rpm
cagraph.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/cagraph/axis/taxis.py
cagraph.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/cagraph-1.2/examples/example99.py
cagraph.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/cagraph-1.2/examples/example6.py
cagraph.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/cagraph/axis/xaxis.py
...
Please contact the developers on that and feel free to correct it.
I think this package should have python in the name:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29
I suppose you can use a single chmod to change all the py file's permissions.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2011-12-09 08:57:24 EST --- All comments were addressed, I also cringed at the %perl statements in there but could not give a reason for them to go. I'm glad they have :-) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405 --- Comment #17 from Jeffrey C. Ollie j...@ocjtech.us 2011-12-09 09:57:18 EST --- (In reply to comment #16) I also cringed at the %perl statements in there but could not give a reason for them to go. I'm glad they have :-) Yeah using Perl is like trying to pound a nail with a sledgehammer but I'm usually better at writing regexes with Perl than sed, especially if they are complex. These were trivial so it was easy to replace them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405 Jeffrey C. Ollie j...@ocjtech.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Jeffrey C. Ollie j...@ocjtech.us 2011-12-09 10:20:35 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: mcollective Short Description: A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems Owners: jcollie Branches: f16 f15 el6 el5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2011-12-09 10:37:19 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 761063] Review Request: cover_grabber - Download album cover art
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761063 --- Comment #9 from Jayson Vaughn vaughn.jay...@gmail.com 2011-12-09 11:44:47 EST --- Spec URL: http://69.164.204.114/cover_grabber.spec SRPM URL: http://69.164.204.114/cover_grabber-1.1.0-1.fc16.src.rpm rpmlint output: cover_grabber.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ogg - egg, org, boggy cover_grabber.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US covergrabber - cover grabber, cover-grabber, recoverable cover_grabber.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ogg - egg, org, boggy cover_grabber.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary covergrabber 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Will post Koji scratch build when Koji is operational again. Currently it is down due to NFS failure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 753513] Review Request: minetest - Multiplayer infinite-world block sandbox with survival mode
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753513 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-09 13:31:22 EST --- minetest-0.3.1-6.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/minetest-0.3.1-6.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 753513] Review Request: minetest - Multiplayer infinite-world block sandbox with survival mode
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753513 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-09 13:31:12 EST --- minetest-0.3.1-6.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/minetest-0.3.1-6.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 753513] Review Request: minetest - Multiplayer infinite-world block sandbox with survival mode
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753513 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 755498] Review Request: trayer - Lightweight GTK2-based systray for UNIX desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755498 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #1 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2011-12-09 13:39:15 EST --- According to the files, the license is GPLv2+, not MIT. The FSF address is wrong. Feel free to correct it or not, but inform upstream. Inform upstream, they're shipping a wrong license file and therefore don't include it or replace it with the proper one for Fedora. Even other files state LGPL. I'm not really sure, whether you're packaging a real release or a snapshot. If it is a snapshot, you must change release and give guidelines how to build the tarball you're using. If it is not a snapshot, use a URL for Source0. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines The build does not respect Fedora's optflags. You can drop defattr. CREDITS is not UTF8. Buildroot, clean section and the rm in the install section are only useful for EPEL 5 or older. If you're not going for these, remove them. Don't exceed 80 characters per line with your description. Please align the entries for Source0 and Group with the rest (mixed use of tabs and spaces) Ask upstream to release tarball names and directories that don't contain a Git hash, but name-version or something different that makes sense: http://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/kernel.org/software/scm/git/docs/git-archive.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 765953] Review Request: qyoto - Mono Qt bindings library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765953 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997(kde-reviews) Alias||qyoto -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 765953] New: Review Request: qyoto - Mono Qt bindings library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qyoto - Mono Qt bindings library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765953 Summary: Review Request: qyoto - Mono Qt bindings library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdie...@math.unl.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdebindings/qyoto.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdebindings/qyoto-4.7.90-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: .NET/Mono bindings for the Qt libraries from the kdebindings Qyoto project. More split kdebindings packaging (last monotithic kdebindings was in f15/kdebindings-4.6.x) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 765953] Review Request: qyoto - Mono Qt bindings library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765953 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||765955(kde-4.8) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757851] Review Request: ark - Archive manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757851 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||765955(kde-4.8) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757856] Review Request: kdf - View disk usage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757856 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||765955(kde-4.8) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757855] Review Request: kcharselect - Character selector
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757855 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||765955(kde-4.8) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757866] Review Request: kde-printer-applet - KDE printer applet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757866 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||765955(kde-4.8) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757861] Review Request: ktimer - Task Scheduler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757861 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||765955(kde-4.8) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 761559] Review Request: filelight - Graphical Disk Usage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761559 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||765955(kde-4.8) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757861] Review Request: ktimer - Task Scheduler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757861 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|656997(kde-reviews) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758234] Review Request: kmag - A screen magnifier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758234 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||765955(kde-4.8) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757868] Review Request: superkaramba - Create widgets for your KDE desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757868 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||765955(kde-4.8) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757858] Review Request: kfloppy - Floppy formatting tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757858 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||765955(kde-4.8) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758278] Review Request: kmouth - A program that speaks for you
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758278 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||765955(kde-4.8) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758245] Review Request: kmousetool - A program that clicks the mouse for you
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758245 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu Blocks||765955(kde-4.8) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757870] Review Request: sweeper - Clean unwanted traces the user leaves on the system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757870 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||765955(kde-4.8) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757861] Review Request: ktimer - Task Scheduler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757861 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-12-09 13:57:40 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-12-09 13:57:40 EST --- imported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747093] Review Request: physfs2 - Library to provide abstract access to various archives
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747093 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX Last Closed||2011-12-09 14:29:41 --- Comment #2 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2011-12-09 14:29:41 EST --- I'm closing this one out, since it is clear on a second look that 2.0.2 is backwards compatible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 755093] Review Request: mactel-boot - boot tools for Intel Apple hardware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755093 --- Comment #26 from Chris Murphy bugzi...@colorremedies.com 2011-12-09 14:32:56 EST --- MacBookPro 4,1 - over 20 EFI boot attempts with ~4 possible boot results from DVD, and from hard disk. Appears to be some sort of intermittent corruption, resulting in initramfs unpacking problems, or VBIOS corruption. Also frequently hangs at GRUB. These entries are for a computer I own. MacBookPro 3,1 - ~ 10 EFI boot attempts also with varying results boot to boot. Same Nvidia graphics as the 4,1 model. Original bug reporter's owns this hardware. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765954 Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems until there is a consistently bootable machine, there's not much point in using it for further testing. Next are display problems with a MacBookPro8,2 (early 2011) which likewise for the moment makes further testing very difficult since I can't see what I'm doing. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765954 Neither are afflicted in this manner when booting with CSM-BIOS. So I'm kinda stuck 2 for 2 on Apple hardware and EFI boot not even working at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747092] Review Request: lzma-sdk457 - SDK for lzma compression
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747092 --- Comment #4 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2011-12-09 14:30:57 EST --- I really could use this package to get physfs updated... are there any items holding up this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758278] Review Request: kmouth - A program that speaks for you
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758278 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758278] Review Request: kmouth - A program that speaks for you
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758278 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-12-09 14:44:15 EST --- naming: ok sources: ok 80cf8b5a2ebf1ce21f1ef7aba67db136 kmouth-4.7.80.tar.bz2 licensing: ok scriptlets: ok SHOULD: the htmldoc hack is not needed here (it's not multilib'd), but it's not exactly harmful to keep either. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758278] Review Request: kmouth - A program that speaks for you
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758278 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-12-09 14:46:48 EST --- small thing, looks like the license comment is a copy-n-paste error (from mag?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758234] Review Request: kmag - A screen magnifier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758234 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-12-09 14:47:50 EST --- pretty simple naming: ok sources: ok 23c851b67903e844030ec7b104c3f1d8 kmag-4.7.80.tar.bz2 licensing: ok scriptlets: ok APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758245] Review Request: kmousetool - A program that clicks the mouse for you
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758245 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758245] Review Request: kmousetool - A program that clicks the mouse for you
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758245 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2011-12-09 14:49:55 EST --- another small/simple one. naming: ok sources: ok 3273a914ea43f1dbf21e00ef727f750b kmousetool-4.7.80.tar.bz2 license: ok scriptlets: ok APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 723427] Review Request: jinput - Java Game Controller API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723427 --- Comment #7 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2011-12-09 14:50:50 EST --- Ping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 765988] Review Request: mobipocket - A collection of plugins to handle mobipocket files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765988 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997(kde-reviews), ||765955(kde-4.8) Alias||mobipocket -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 765988] New: Review Request: mobipocket - A collection of plugins to handle mobipocket files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mobipocket - A collection of plugins to handle mobipocket files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765988 Summary: Review Request: mobipocket - A collection of plugins to handle mobipocket files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdie...@math.unl.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdegraphics/mobipocket.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdegraphics/mobipocket-4.7.90-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: A collection of plugins to handle mobipocket files another kdegraphics-split-in-git victim. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758166] [EPEL] - Review Request -- thrift 0.6.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758166 --- Comment #11 from Jeffrey C. Ollie j...@ocjtech.us 2011-12-09 15:37:01 EST --- Created attachment 544692 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=544692 Build with 0.8.0 on Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758166] [EPEL] - Review Request -- thrift 0.6.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758166 Jeffrey C. Ollie j...@ocjtech.us changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@ocjtech.us --- Comment #12 from Jeffrey C. Ollie j...@ocjtech.us 2011-12-09 15:39:44 EST --- Nelson, thanks for taking this on. I attached a patch to the spec file that has the changes that I made to get Thrift 0.8.0 to compile on Fedora. I'm just getting started with Thrift/Cassandra so I figured I'd start with the latest available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720813] Review Request: python-strainer - Tools to allow developers to cleanup web serialization objects (HTML, JSON, XHTML)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720813 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #1 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2011-12-09 15:36:32 EST --- Do you want to package for EPEL 5 or older? If not, delete buildroot, clean section and the rm in the install section, as well as the sitelib definition. Otherwise, use an if around it, like: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Macros Defattr is no longer necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 714543] Review Request: maze5 - A program for generating mazes of miscellaneous styles and sizes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714543 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Status Whiteboard||Stalled review Last Closed||2011-12-09 15:39:59 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-09 15:55:34 EST --- mcollective-1.3.1-6.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mcollective-1.3.1-6.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-09 15:57:04 EST --- mcollective-1.3.1-6.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mcollective-1.3.1-6.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 750139] Review Request: lv2-mdala-plugins - LV2 port of the MDA VST plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139 --- Comment #7 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com 2011-12-09 15:55:25 EST --- Hi Jerry, this may be on hold for a while. I have this other LV@ plugin if interested bug 760270 cheers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 706432] Review Request: aggregate - IPv4 CIDR prefix aggregator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706432 Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added CC||volke...@gmx.at --- Comment #1 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at 2011-12-09 16:04:39 EST --- licensecheck finds the license to be ISC. What does aggregate(1) mean in the ios description? You don't need to include the license file and history in the sub-package, as it requires the main package. Better use an asterix instead of gz in the files section. The manpages should be installed with -p. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 755079] Review Request: condor-wallaby-base-db - A condor database for wallaby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755079 --- Comment #2 from Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com 2011-12-09 16:12:42 EST --- Updated from upstream and fixed a few build issues: Spec URL: http://rrati.fedorapeople.org/condor-wallaby-base-db.spec SRPM URL: http://rrati.fedorapeople.org/condor-wallaby-base-db-1.18-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 755066] Review Request: chromaprint - Library implementing the AcoustID fingerprinting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755066 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-09 16:24:43 EST --- chromaprint-0.5-4.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/chromaprint-0.5-4.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 755066] Review Request: chromaprint - Library implementing the AcoustID fingerprinting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755066 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-09 16:24:55 EST --- chromaprint-0.5-4.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/chromaprint-0.5-4.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 755066] Review Request: chromaprint - Library implementing the AcoustID fingerprinting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755066 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 755890] Review Request: snap A modular cross-platform system backup/restore utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-09 16:29:55 EST --- snap-0.5-7.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/snap-0.5-7.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 755890] Review Request: snap A modular cross-platform system backup/restore utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-09 16:29:38 EST --- snap-0.5-7.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/snap-0.5-7.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 755890] Review Request: snap A modular cross-platform system backup/restore utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 755890] Review Request: snap A modular cross-platform system backup/restore utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-09 16:29:46 EST --- snap-0.5-7.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/snap-0.5-7.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720813] Review Request: python-strainer - Tools to allow developers to cleanup web serialization objects (HTML, JSON, XHTML)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720813 --- Comment #2 from Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com 2011-12-09 16:33:16 EST --- Yes, I do wish to build this for EPEL 5. I updated the package to address all of your points. Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-strainer.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-strainer-0.1.4-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 753855] Review Request: pslib - C-library to create PostScript files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753855 --- Comment #5 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-12-09 16:40:11 EST --- Never got a response to my post in legal. I guess I don't have any concerns, but if you do we should block FE-LEGAL I think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 706432] Review Request: aggregate - IPv4 CIDR prefix aggregator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706432 --- Comment #2 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com 2011-12-09 17:04:13 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) Thanks for the review. licensecheck finds the license to be ISC. Obviously BSD type licenses confuse me. Didn't know about licensecheck. What does aggregate(1) mean in the ios description? I guess it means aggregate in man section 1, as most commands are usually referred in documentation. But I guess not necessary here. I've removed it. You don't need to include the license file and history in the sub-package, as it requires the main package. Removed. Better use an asterix instead of gz in the files section. Changed to asterisk. The manpages should be installed with -p. Added a -p. 1.6-2 - Some changes suggested by review comment #1 Spec URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/aggregate/aggregate.spec SRPM URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/aggregate/aggregate-1.6-2.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 555018] Review Request: gnac - An audio converter for GNOME (first package, seeking sponsor)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555018 Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Last Closed||2011-12-09 17:04:40 --- Comment #27 from Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-09 17:04:40 EST --- It seems that Tylor is no longer interested Danny, if you would like to take over this package, please go ahead. Update the package, file a new review request and mark then change the resolution of this one to Duplicate of the new one. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 761319] Fedora 17 feature GTKD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761319 --- Comment #1 from MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornat...@gmail.com 2011-12-09 17:52:47 EST --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3576386 this one add in more tag for geany and a book for devhelp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758166] [EPEL] - Review Request -- thrift 0.6.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758166 --- Comment #13 from Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com 2011-12-09 17:58:15 EST --- Hi Jeffrey, I will try to finish this submission this weekend and if possible a few others I have on the queue (lcm, darwin streaming server and a few perl modules). I've seen Tom also closed two reviews that will help enable a package I have for Fedora, so there's quite a few hours I need to fix all of this. Right now struggling to recover my system as RHEL update from 6.1 to 6.2 has some nefast effects on my laptop. NM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 698405] Review Request: mcollective - A framework to build server orchestration or parallel job execution systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698405 --- Comment #22 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2011-12-09 18:42:43 EST --- Hi Jeffrey, It's your call but does it make sense to release with 1.3.2 at this point since just released. Steve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747659] Review Request: proxool - Java connection pool library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747659 --- Comment #4 from Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com 2011-12-09 19:06:08 EST --- Oh, you are correct on the license. At first glance, it does resemble 4-clause BSD ... but it has 6 clauses, of course, and is essentially a clone of Apache Software License 1.0 with Proxool substituted for Apache. I have sent an email to the maintainer. As it stands, the proper license for the package should literally be Proxool License, but I'm going to hope that he comes back with the other authors and a decision to adopt a less restrictive license (like ASL 2.0 or revised BSD). Does a license like this require approval from legal, or is it sufficient to diff it against ASL 1.0 and say these are the same? If it does not require separate approval, I'll just change the LICENSE line and finish up the review, and if/when the maintainer updates the license upstream, I can update the package. If it has to go through a process to be added to the license list, though, I'm not sure it's worth the trouble. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766083] New: Fedora 17 feature Derelict
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Fedora 17 feature Derelict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766083 Summary: Fedora 17 feature Derelict Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bioinfornat...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Created attachment 544811 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=544811 spec file rplint Spec: - $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/derelict.spec rpmbuild/SPECS/derelict.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: derelict-20111031svn591.tar.xz 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - rpmlint SRPMS: - $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/derelict-2-12.20111031svn591.fc16.src.rpm derelict.src: W: spelling-error Summary(fr) It - T, Itô, Dt derelict.src: W: spelling-error Summary(fr) is - si, us, os derelict.src: W: spelling-error Summary(fr) of - off, if, or derelict.src: W: spelling-error Summary(fr) bindings - buildings derelict.src: W: spelling-error Summary(fr) to - tau, go, t derelict.src: W: spelling-error Summary(fr) shared - daredare derelict.src: W: spelling-error Summary(fr) libraries - libraires, librairies, librairie derelict.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtime - run time, run-time, rudiment derelict.src: W: strange-permission DdocToDevhelp 0755L derelict.src: W: invalid-url Source0: derelict-20111031svn591.tar.xz - scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3576576 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 760268] Review Request: zita-dpl1 - digital peak limiter for JACK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760268 Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo? | Last Closed||2011-12-09 19:57:03 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 656082] Review Request: cprops - library of C prototyping functions, mostly searching
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656082 --- Comment #11 from Philip Prindeville phil...@redfish-solutions.com 2011-12-09 22:25:08 EST --- Updating again: http://fedorapeople.org/~philipp/libcprops-0.1.10-0.1.fc16.src.rpm http://fedorapeople.org/~philipp/libcprops.spec [philipp@builder SPECS]$ rpmlint libcprops.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [philipp@builder SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/libcprops-0.1.10-0.1.fc16.src.rpm libcprops.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US trie - tire, true, tie libcprops.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tcp - pct, tsp, tip libcprops.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http - HTTP libcprops.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US api - pi, ape, apt libcprops.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dbms - DBMS, dims, dams 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. [philipp@builder SPECS]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 761094] Review Request: asn1c - An ASN.1 Compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761094 Nathaniel McCallum nathan...@natemccallum.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(nathaniel@natemcc | |allum.com) | --- Comment #4 from Nathaniel McCallum nathan...@natemccallum.com 2011-12-10 00:24:49 EST --- Updated with the fix to remove the duplicate docs directory. Spec URL: http://npmccallum.fedorapeople.org/asn1c/asn1c.spec SRPM URL: http://npmccallum.fedorapeople.org/asn1c/asn1c-0.9.21-2.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
