[Bug 737401] Review Request: saga - Geographic information system with an API for processing geodata
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737401 --- Comment #10 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-12-13 02:46:09 EST --- wxpropgrid is on review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767082 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 767082] New: Review Request: wxpropgrid - A property sheet control for wxWidgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wxpropgrid - A property sheet control for wxWidgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767082 Summary: Review Request: wxpropgrid - A property sheet control for wxWidgets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: volke...@gmx.at QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/wxpropgrid.spec SRPM URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/wxpropgrid-1.4.15-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: wxPropertyGrid is a property sheet control for wxWidgets. In other words, it is a specialized two-column grid for editing properties such as strings, numbers, flagsets, string arrays, and colors. [makerpm@lenovo-muw ~]$ rpmlint wxprop* wxpropgrid.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) wxWidgets -> widgets wxpropgrid.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wxPropertyGrid -> expropriated wxpropgrid.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wxWidgets -> widgets wxpropgrid.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US flagsets -> flag sets, flag-sets, flatlets wxpropgrid.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libwxcode_gtk2u_propgrid-2.8.so.0.0.0 linux-vdso.so.1 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3581735 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697247] Review Request: gsmartcontrol - Graphical user interface for smartctl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697247 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-13 02:39:47 EST --- gsmartcontrol-0.8.6-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gsmartcontrol-0.8.6-3.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697247] Review Request: gsmartcontrol - Graphical user interface for smartctl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697247 --- Comment #12 from Eric Smith 2011-12-13 02:33:44 EST --- Applied simple patch from upstream that fixes build with Glib 2.31. Only a few lines of code changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697247] Review Request: gsmartcontrol - Graphical user interface for smartctl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697247 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-13 02:29:42 EST --- gsmartcontrol-0.8.6-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gsmartcontrol-0.8.6-3.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 697247] Review Request: gsmartcontrol - Graphical user interface for smartctl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697247 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 752169] Review Request: zukitwo - Themes for GTK+2, GTK+3, Metacity and GNOME Shell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752169 Mattia Meneguzzo changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: zukitwo - |gnome-shell-theme-zukitwo - |Themes for GTK+2, GTK+3, |The Zukitwo GTK and GNOME |Metacity and GNOME Shell |Shell theme | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766604] Review Request: Bashmount
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766604 Harsh Verma changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 765651] Review Request: asterisk-gui - Graphical interface for Asterisk configuration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765651 --- Comment #5 from Matthieu Saulnier 2011-12-13 01:04:03 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) > if this take some time open a bug to asterisk-gui bugzilla and show here the > url Done https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/AGUI-326 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766604] Review Request: Bashmount
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766604 --- Comment #3 from Harsh Verma 2011-12-13 00:46:26 EST --- Thanks folks for review. Have made the mentioned changes. Kindly check. Spec URL: http://yevlempy.fedorapeople.org/bashmount.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 761474] Review Request: ibus-european-table - Predictive text for european languages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761474 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 761474] Review Request: ibus-european-table - Predictive text for european languages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761474 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700353] Review Request: perl-HTTP-OAI - API for the OAI-PMH
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700353 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2011-12-12 23:33:55 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 767050] New: Review Request: hibernate-validator - Bean Validation (JSR 303) Reference Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hibernate-validator - Bean Validation (JSR 303) Reference Implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767050 Summary: Review Request: hibernate-validator - Bean Validation (JSR 303) Reference Implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: agr...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Name: hibernate-validator Version : 4.2.0 Group : Development/Libraries License : ASL 2.0 URL : http://www.hibernate.org/subprojects/validator.html Summary : Bean Validation (JSR 303) Reference Implementation Description : Bean Validation (JSR 303) Reference Implementation SPEC: http://downloads.eucalyptus.com/devel/packages/fedora-16/SPECS/hibernate-validator.spec SRPM: http://downloads.eucalyptus.com/devel/packages/fedora-16/SRPMS/hibernate-validator-4.2.0-1.fc17.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 767050] Review Request: hibernate-validator - Bean Validation (JSR 303) Reference Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767050 Andy Grimm changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 767047] New: Review Request: ViTables - Viewer for Hierarical Datafiles (HDF5)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ViTables - Viewer for Hierarical Datafiles (HDF5) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767047 Summary: Review Request: ViTables - Viewer for Hierarical Datafiles (HDF5) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thibault.no...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://tnorth.fedorapeople.org/ViTables.spec SRPM URL: http://tnorth.fedorapeople.org/ViTables-2.1-2.fc15.src.rpm Description: Viewer for Hierarical Datafiles (HDF5) Hi, ViTables is a Python/Qt viewer for HDF5 files, especially useful with python-tables. Having it into Fedora would be nice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 767042] Review Request: js-of-ocaml - OCaml to Javascript compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767042 --- Comment #1 from Scott Tsai 2011-12-12 22:48:01 EST --- Successful Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3581663 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 767042] New: Review Request: js-of-ocaml - OCaml to Javascript compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: js-of-ocaml - OCaml to Javascript compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767042
Summary: Review Request: js-of-ocaml - OCaml to Javascript
compiler
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: scottt...@gmail.com
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Spec URL: http://scottt.tw/fedora/js-of-ocaml.spec
SRPM URL: http://scottt.tw/fedora/js-of-ocaml-1.0.9-1.fc16.src.rpm
Description:
js_of_ocaml is a compiler of OCaml byte-code to JavaScript.
It makes it possible to run OCaml programs in a web browser.
Its key features are the following:
* the whole language, and most of the standard library are
supported;
* the generated code can be used with any web server and browser;
* you can use a standard installation of OCaml to compile your
programs. In particular, you do not have to recompile a library to
use it with Js_of_ocaml. You just have to link your program with a
specific library to interface with the browser APIs.
From: http://ocsigen.org/js_of_ocaml/manual/overview
"Usage:
Your program must first be compiled using the OCaml bytecode compiler ocamlc.
Javascript bindings, as well as a corresponding syntax extension, are provided
by the js_of_ocaml package.
ocamlfind ocamlc -package js_of_ocaml -syntax camlp4o -linkpkg \
-o cubes.byte cubes.ml
Then, run the js_of_ocaml compiler to produce Javascript code:
js_of_ocaml cubes.byte"
This is way I didn't split produce a separate -debug package.
While using rpmlint, note that:
If /usr/bin/js_of_ocaml is stripped, it generates a
Fatal error: exception Sys_error("Illegal seek")
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700353] Review Request: perl-HTTP-OAI - API for the OAI-PMH
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700353 Nicholas van Oudtshoorn changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Nicholas van Oudtshoorn 2011-12-12 22:26:33 EST --- Doh! Gotta hate copy and paste errors. Apologies for the time-stealing. Here's the proper SCM Request! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-HTTP-OAI Short Description: API for the OAI-PMH Owners: vanoudt Branches: f15 f16 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766604] Review Request: Bashmount
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766604 Rahul Sundaram changed: What|Removed |Added CC||methe...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Rahul Sundaram 2011-12-12 21:51:02 EST --- * You can just drop the defattr completely since its fully redundant now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700354] Review Request: perl-Locale-Currency-Format - Perl functions for formatting monetary values
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700354 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2011-12-12 21:39:43 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700344] Review Request: perl-Authen-CAS-Client - Interface for authentication via JA-SIG's Central Authentication Service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700344 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2011-12-12 21:30:42 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700353] Review Request: perl-HTTP-OAI - API for the OAI-PMH
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700353 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2011-12-12 21:32:16 EST --- Review summary and SCM request package names don't match, please correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747092] Review Request: lzma-sdk457 - SDK for lzma compression
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747092 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2011-12-12 21:20:34 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742996] Review Request: libpwquality - A library for password generation and password quality checking
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742996 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2011-12-12 21:18:27 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700354] Review Request: perl-Locale-Currency-Format - Perl functions for formatting monetary values
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700354 --- Comment #6 from Nicholas van Oudtshoorn 2011-12-12 21:05:19 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Locale-Currency-Format Short Description: Locale::Currency::Format is a light-weight Perl module that enables Perl code to display monetary values in the formats recognized internationally and/or locally. Owners: vanoudt Branches: f15 f16 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700353] Review Request: perl-HTTP-OAI - API for the OAI-PMH
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700353 --- Comment #6 from Nicholas van Oudtshoorn 2011-12-12 20:59:53 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Authen-CAS-Client Short Description: he Authen::CAS::Client module provides a simple interface for authenticating users using JA-SIG's CAS protocol. Both CAS v1.0 and v2.0 are supported. Owners: vanoudt Branches: f15 f16 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700352] Review Request: perl-DublinCore-Record - Container for Dublin Core metadata elements
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700352 --- Comment #7 from Nicholas van Oudtshoorn 2011-12-12 20:58:15 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-DublinCore-Record Short Description: DublinCore::Record is an abstract class for manipulating DublinCore meta-data. Owners: vanoudt Branches: f15 f16 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700344] Review Request: perl-Authen-CAS-Client - Interface for authentication via JA-SIG's Central Authentication Service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700344 Nicholas van Oudtshoorn changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Nicholas van Oudtshoorn 2011-12-12 20:55:57 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Authen-CAS-Client Short Description: Interface for authentication via JA-SIG's Central Authentication Service Owners: vanoudt Branches: f15 f16 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728815] Review Request: trademgen - C++ Simulated Travel Demand Generation Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728815 --- Comment #5 from Denis Arnaud 2011-12-12 20:53:54 EST --- Thanks for the review (I am conscious that it is not completed yet)! (In reply to comment #4) > REVIEW: > - your favorite, (ignorable in your case) rpmlint error: ;) > trademgen.src: E: invalid-spec-name Indeed, you did convince me to manage versionning of the specification file with Git in GitHub: https://github.com/denisarnaud/fedorareviews/blob/trunk/sim/trademgen/trademgen_728815/trademgen.spec In contrast, on the fedorapeople.org site, as we can not know the version of a specification without downloading it, I used to name the specification after the version, so that there is no ambiguity. For the next time, I'll use only GitHub for the specification file :) > NEEDSWORK: > - The python lib doesn't seem to work or pytrademgen has a UserError Well, that Python script is just a proof-of-concept/sample, in order to demonstrate how to expose a Python API, wrapped around the original C++ library API. It does nothing very useful for now. I'll rework it later on, so that the output seems alike what is produced by the pure C++ binary. In the meantime, I believe it is still interesting to see how to cleanly wrap the C++ library within a Python script, thanks to Boost.Python. > - license looks weired > - It looks like Boost is bundled for running the tests: > ./test/math/boost_math/empirical_distribution/count.hpp: BSL (v1.0) In fact, the test/math/ sub-directory is just a collection of samples from third party libraries. Indeed, I have benchmarked a few features of TraDemGen against some of those third party examples (that's why I left them there in the first place). For instance, a comparison of the different random generation methods/technologies can be made. However, those third party libraries are certainly not used by TraDemGen, neither by the core library, nor by the unit tests. I have therefore just transfered them into another Git repository, more appropriate for them (https://github.com/denisarnaud/playground). The test-related source tree has been cleaned (https://github.com/airsim/trademgen/tree/trunk/test). I have still to update the specification file to reflect that. Following is the updated package: -- Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/sim/trademgen/trademgen.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/sim/trademgen/trademgen-0.2.2-1.fc16.src.rpm -- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700352] Review Request: perl-DublinCore-Record - Container for Dublin Core metadata elements
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700352 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2011-12-12 20:50:02 EST --- Please include an SCM request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700344] Review Request: perl-Authen-CAS-Client - Interface for authentication via JA-SIG's Central Authentication Service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700344 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2011-12-12 20:38:19 EST --- Please include an SCM request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700344] Review Request: perl-Authen-CAS-Client - Interface for authentication via JA-SIG's Central Authentication Service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700344 Nicholas van Oudtshoorn changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700352] Review Request: perl-DublinCore-Record - Container for Dublin Core metadata elements
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700352 Nicholas van Oudtshoorn changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700354] Review Request: perl-Locale-Currency-Format - Perl functions for formatting monetary values
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700354 Nicholas van Oudtshoorn changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700353] Review Request: perl-HTTP-OAI - API for the OAI-PMH
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700353 Nicholas van Oudtshoorn changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726080] Review Request: Xnee - X11 environment recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726080 --- Comment #47 from Martin Gieseking 2011-12-12 17:13:54 EST --- Matthieu, please don't assign new release builds to the review request. Since the review is finished and Xnee is already in the stable repo, this ticket should kept closed. All further package updates are either related to the corresponding bug report or have no bug assigned in case of version bumps. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742166] Review Request: wmctrl - X Window Manager command-line tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742166 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|wmctrl-1.07-9.fc15 |wmctrl-1.07-9.fc16 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12 17:06:56 EST --- wmctrl-1.07-9.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747092] Review Request: lzma-sdk457 - SDK for lzma compression
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747092 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2011-12-12 18:22:50 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: lzma-sdk457 Short Description: SDK for lzma compression Owners: spot Branches: f15 f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 754094] Review Request: restauth - Web-service providing shared authentication, authorization and preferences
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754094 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||restauth-0.5.2-3.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-12-12 17:05:55 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12 17:05:55 EST --- restauth-0.5.2-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757290] Review Request: unicode-ucd - Unicode Character Database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757290 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|unicode-ucd-6.0.0-2.fc15|unicode-ucd-6.0.0-2.fc16 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12 17:08:00 EST --- unicode-ucd-6.0.0-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 755066] Review Request: chromaprint - Library implementing the AcoustID fingerprinting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755066 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||chromaprint-0.5-4.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-12-12 17:03:24 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12 17:03:24 EST --- chromaprint-0.5-4.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 751820] Review Request: pius - A tool for signing and emailing all UIDs on a set of PGP keys.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751820 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||pius-2.0.9-2.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-12-12 17:02:29 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12 17:02:29 EST --- pius-2.0.9-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 754088] Review Request: python-restauth-common - Collects various code used in RestAuth server/client implementations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754088 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-restauth-common-0.5. ||1-3.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-12-12 17:02:21 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12 17:02:21 EST --- python-restauth-common-0.5.1-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726080] Review Request: Xnee - X11 environment recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726080 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|Xnee-3.10.91-1.fc16 |Xnee-3.10.91-1.fc15 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12 17:04:53 EST --- Xnee-3.10.91-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747051] Review Request: transmission-remote-gtk - GTK remote control for the Transmission BitTorrent client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747051 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||transmission-remote-gtk-0.7 ||-3.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-12-12 16:55:52 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12 16:55:52 EST --- transmission-remote-gtk-0.7-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 735179] Review Request: openstack-keystone - OpenStack Identity Service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735179 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||openstack-keystone-2011.3.1 ||-2.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-12-12 16:56:35 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12 16:56:35 EST --- openstack-keystone-2011.3.1-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757997] Review Request: pam_mapi - PAM module for authentication via MAPI against a Zarafa server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757997 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|pam_mapi-0.1.0-1.fc15 |pam_mapi-0.1.0-1.fc16 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12 16:59:30 EST --- pam_mapi-0.1.0-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742166] Review Request: wmctrl - X Window Manager command-line tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742166 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||wmctrl-1.07-9.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-12-12 16:53:16 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12 16:53:16 EST --- wmctrl-1.07-9.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 726080] Review Request: Xnee - X11 environment recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726080 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||Xnee-3.10.91-1.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-12-12 16:55:06 --- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12 16:55:06 EST --- Xnee-3.10.91-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757997] Review Request: pam_mapi - PAM module for authentication via MAPI against a Zarafa server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757997 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||pam_mapi-0.1.0-1.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-12-12 16:52:48 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12 16:52:48 EST --- pam_mapi-0.1.0-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757290] Review Request: unicode-ucd - Unicode Character Database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757290 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||unicode-ucd-6.0.0-2.fc15 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2011-12-12 16:53:04 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12 16:53:04 EST --- unicode-ucd-6.0.0-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742996] Review Request: libpwquality - A library for password generation and password quality checking
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742996 Tomas Mraz changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Tomas Mraz 2011-12-12 16:10:58 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: libpwquality New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: tmraz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728815] Review Request: trademgen - C++ Simulated Travel Demand Generation Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728815 Thomas Spura changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|toms...@fedoraproject.org Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura 2011-12-12 16:07:12 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Hmm, you might need to port this to a new soci version > > In fact, I am also the maintainer of SOCI :) Hmm, problem solved ;) REVIEW: - your favorite, (ignorable in your case) rpmlint error: ;) $ rpmlint /home/tom/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/trademgen-0.2.1-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm /home/tom/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/trademgen-devel-0.2.1-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm /home/tom/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/trademgen-debuginfo-0.2.1-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm /home/tom/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/trademgen-doc-0.2.1-1.fc16.noarch.rpm /home/tom/rpmbuild/SRPMS/trademgen-0.2.1-1.fc16.src.rpm trademgen.src: E: invalid-spec-name 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. - name ok - doc noarch properly - el5 needs there (buildroot & R pkgconfig) - libraries correctly packaged - ldconfig there - check there - parallel make - macros everywhere - %doc ok - koji successful: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3580978 NEEDSWORK: - The python lib doesn't seem to work or pytrademgen has a UserError (Maybe write an test for it? ;)): $ pytrademgen FRA searchString: FRA Raw result from the Trademgen library: The Trademgen service has not been initialised, i.e., the init() method has not been called correctly on the Trademgener object. Please check that all the parameters are not empty and point to actual files. - license looks weired - It looks like Boost is bundled for running the tests: ./test/math/boost_math/empirical_distribution/count.hpp: BSL (v1.0) ./test/math/boost_math/empirical_distribution/frequency.hpp: BSL (v1.0) ./test/math/boost_math/empirical_distribution/ordered_sample.hpp: BSL (v1.0) But I can't find those files in boost-devel. If they are not needed besides the tests, it should be ok, but grepping for it: $ find | xargs grep functors.hpp ./test/math/boost_math/visualization/boost/svg_plot/detail/functors.hpp:// functors.hpp ./test/math/boost_math/visualization/boost/svg_plot/svg_1d_plot.hpp:#include "detail/functors.hpp" ./test/math/boost_math/visualization/boost/svg_plot/svg_boxplot.hpp:#include "detail/functors.hpp" ./test/math/boost_math/visualization/boost/svg_plot/svg_2d_plot.hpp:#include "detail/functors.hpp" Binary file ./trademgen/libtrademgen.so.0.2.1 matches Binary file ./trademgen/CMakeFiles/trademgenlib.dir/command/DemandManager.cpp.o matches Binary file ./trademgen/libtrademgen.so.0.2 matches Binary file ./trademgen/libtrademgen.so matches and $ locate functors.hpp /usr/include/boost/date_time/adjust_functors.hpp /usr/include/boost/icl/functors.hpp /usr/include/boost/lambda/detail/lambda_functors.hpp I'm unsure, where this dependency comes from, it just looks like the tests might be used in linking (after simply deleting tests cmake . doesn't complete...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758166] [EPEL] - Review Request -- thrift 0.6.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758166 --- Comment #17 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2011-12-12 15:19:40 EST --- (In reply to comment #16) > I would rather keep myself focused on EPEL and not on Fedora which demands far > more effort. Okay. That's fine. It would be nice if someone was interested in working on the Fedora side in this ticket, but if not, we can work this ticket just for EPEL and leave Fedora to some other ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766943] Review Request: jsilver - A pure-Java implementation of Clearsilver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766943 Andy Grimm changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766943] New: Review Request: jsilver - A pure-Java implementation of Clearsilver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jsilver - A pure-Java implementation of Clearsilver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766943 Summary: Review Request: jsilver - A pure-Java implementation of Clearsilver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: agr...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Name: jsilver Version : 1.0.0 Group : Development/Libraries License : ASL 2.0 URL : http://code.google.com/p/jsilver/ Summary : A pure-Java implementation of Clearsilver Description : A pure-Java implementation of Clearsilver, an HTML template system. SPEC: http://downloads.eucalyptus.com/devel/packages/fedora-16/SPECS/jsilver.spec SRPM: http://downloads.eucalyptus.com/devel/packages/fedora-16/SRPMS/jsilver-1.0.0-1.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758166] [EPEL] - Review Request -- thrift 0.6.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758166 --- Comment #16 from Nelson Marques 2011-12-12 15:13:16 EST --- Tom, Regarding 0.8.0 there's a few itches, some are actually new problems: * Parallel builds are broken; * Unit tests seem fail if redhat-rpm-config is around (needs a bit more of debugging, and most likely some fixes); Regarding the modules: * Java builds fine and installs fine (against java-1.7.0-openjdk); * C# has a open defect[1] on Thrift JIRA since 2009, opened by a Fedora contributor, but no upstream solution was provided since then; * Ruby packaging[2] is a nightmare, I was currently trying to fix this. I would rather keep myself focused on EPEL and not on Fedora which demands far more effort. [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-509 [2] - http://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Archive:PackagingDrafts/RubyGem_with_C_code&oldid=83884 NM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 751537] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-weather - An extension for displaying weather notifications in GNOME Shell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751537 --- Comment #12 from Elad Alfassa 2011-12-12 15:02:36 EST --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #9) > > (In reply to comment #8) > > > Perhaps someone should try getting this into rpmfusion-free... > > > > OK, I'll try to ask for its inclusion in RPMFusion. > > Regardless of an admisibility this package to Fedora it should be noted that > an > included 'weather-extension-configurator.py' is broken as it does not allow to > change what it calls "woeid". Regardless of what you type in a corresponding > form field it has no effect. Moreover despite of consistently calling it that > way it expects no WOEID, like returned for example by > http://woeid.rosselliot.co.nz/, but some other location code one has to divine > somehow to change from a deafault Insbruck or to adjust to a new location. > Currently possible using 'gsettings' once you found such code. This is not the place to report this problem. Report it to the upstream maintainer. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766932] New: Review Request: icfg - utiltiy for scriptable editing of network interface files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: icfg - utiltiy for scriptable editing of network interface files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766932 Summary: Review Request: icfg - utiltiy for scriptable editing of network interface files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nhor...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/icfg.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/icfg-0.9-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: This is a utility for manipulating SysV network interface configuration files (the files matching the glob /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/icfg-*). These are text based files, that are normally easily edited by hand, but in many environments hand editing is not desirable (for instance, during kickstart installations). Icfg creates a scriptable interface to allow an admin to provision a systems network interfaces during install, without having to fall back to using a series of sed and awk commands -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 751537] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-weather - An extension for displaying weather notifications in GNOME Shell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751537 Michal Jaegermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mic...@harddata.com --- Comment #11 from Michal Jaegermann 2011-12-12 14:59:27 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > Perhaps someone should try getting this into rpmfusion-free... > > OK, I'll try to ask for its inclusion in RPMFusion. Regardless of an admisibility this package to Fedora it should be noted that an included 'weather-extension-configurator.py' is broken as it does not allow to change what it calls "woeid". Regardless of what you type in a corresponding form field it has no effect. Moreover despite of consistently calling it that way it expects no WOEID, like returned for example by http://woeid.rosselliot.co.nz/, but some other location code one has to divine somehow to change from a deafault Insbruck or to adjust to a new location. Currently possible using 'gsettings' once you found such code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 765651] Review Request: asterisk-gui - Graphical interface for Asterisk configuration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765651 --- Comment #3 from MERCIER Jonathan 2011-12-12 14:37:35 EST --- it seem ok, could you please open a bug to upstream for fix the mismatch license This will fix rpmlint error: incorrect-fsf-address -> I'm asking with upstram to fix it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 765651] Review Request: asterisk-gui - Graphical interface for Asterisk configuration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765651 --- Comment #4 from MERCIER Jonathan 2011-12-12 14:38:46 EST --- oh i have miss your comment "I'm asking with upstram to fix it" if this take some time open a bug to asterisk-gui bugzilla and show here the url -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766916] New: Review Request: grinder - tool for synchronizing yum repositories
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: grinder - tool for synchronizing yum repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766916 Summary: Review Request: grinder - tool for synchronizing yum repositories Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jmatt...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- SRPM: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/g/r/grinder/grinder-0.0.132-1.fc14.src.rpm SPEC: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/g/r/grinder/grinder.spec %description A tool for syncing content from the Red Hat Network. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705372] Review Request: perl-Unicode-LineBreak - UAX #14 Unicode Line Breaking Algorithm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705372 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Unicode-LineBreak-2011 |perl-Unicode-LineBreak-2011 |.11-2.el6 |.11-2.el5 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12 14:28:20 EST --- perl-Unicode-LineBreak-2011.11-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 705372] Review Request: perl-Unicode-LineBreak - UAX #14 Unicode Line Breaking Algorithm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705372 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Unicode-LineBreak-2011 |perl-Unicode-LineBreak-2011 |.11-2.fc16 |.11-2.el6 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12 14:26:44 EST --- perl-Unicode-LineBreak-2011.11-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 754123] Review Request: fedora-review - Tool to automate package reviews
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754123 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|fedora-review-0.1.1-1.fc15 |fedora-review-0.1.1-1.el6 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12 14:26:34 EST --- fedora-review-0.1.1-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 754137] Review Request: nagios-plugins-bdii - Nagios Probe for the BDII
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754137 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12 14:26:57 EST --- nagios-plugins-bdii-1.0.14-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 732651] Review Request: sshpass - Non-interactive ssh authentication utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732651 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|sshpass-1.05-1.el6 |sshpass-1.05-1.el5 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12 14:28:44 EST --- sshpass-1.05-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758734] Review Request: fatrat-subtitlesearch - FatRat plugin enabling OpenSubtitles.org and Sublight.si integration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758734 --- Comment #3 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-12-12 14:13:47 EST --- Concerning the name macro: I recently discovered spectool. Spectool substitutes the macros and prints the result. The guidelines don't force you to use it, so it's up to you. Though, in your case, the name is pretty long and I can't see a potential disadvantage. Is there something wrong with the locales? I see they're not installed. OK, I'm fine with the comment in the diff. It's a "SHOULD": http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment I meant to add the %docdir comment in the spec file, not here. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758166] [EPEL] - Review Request -- thrift 0.6.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758166 --- Comment #15 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2011-12-12 13:56:48 EST --- Nelson, I have no problem with you focusing on EPEL here, perhaps Jeff is interested in maintaining the Fedora side of things? That would be an ideal situation, as I could review both sides at one ticket, and let you move forward independently on the EPEL side. It is concerning that redhat-rpm-config causes the build to fail, as koji will have it present in the Build Environment even if it is not specified as an explicit BuildRequires, so I think you may need to fix that now, if it affects 0.6.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766893] New: Review Request: VMware-view-open-client - VMware View Open Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: VMware-view-open-client - VMware View Open Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766893 Summary: Review Request: VMware-view-open-client - VMware View Open Client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: so...@cmu.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/VMware-view-open-client.spec SRPM URL: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/VMware-view-open-client-4.5.0-1.297975.fc14.src.rpm Description: Allows users to connect to desktops on a View Connection Server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 760177] Review Request: knot - Authoritative DNS server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760177
--- Comment #6 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-12-12 13:50:45 EST
---
%{_libexecdir}/%{name}/* --> %{_libexecdir}/%{name}
That takes ownership of the directory and everything below. The configuration
directory is without an owner as well.
I'd suggest to run the unit tests in a check section, but not to install them,
if you don't have a compelling reason. And if so, rather create a sub-package.
You need BuildRequires: systemd-units, see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Systemd#Filesystem_locations
Why don't you have a %postun scriplet? See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd
You can use %{_sharedstatedir} instead of %{_var}/lib (twice)
The %attr is not necessary for the configuration file. It defaults to exactly
that. In the case of the service file: Pleas use install -p -m644. That gives
you the proper permissions plus preserves the timestamp.
The configuration files should preserve their original timestamp on installing.
I wonder, if the other sample configuration files in the tarball could act as
further documentation.
(Please delete the empty line at the very bottom.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 749885] Review Request: iris - A library for working with the XMPP/Jabber protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749885 --- Comment #28 from Rex Dieter 2011-12-12 13:52:03 EST --- To my question that iris can be included with some missing copyright headers, fedora-legal responded with: "So, the answer here is yes (with caveats), as long as we have clear evidence that the files are part of a larger work where there is consistent licensing intent." full response here, http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2011-December/001765.html it is my opinion this means that the lack of clear copyright headers in this case should not be considered a review blocker. To be clear, however, I will continue my efforts to get upstream to clarify. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766882] Review Request: htmlunit - A headless web browser for automated testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766882 Andy Grimm changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766882] New: Review Request: htmlunit - A headless web browser for automated testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: htmlunit - A headless web browser for automated testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766882 Summary: Review Request: htmlunit - A headless web browser for automated testing Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: agr...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Name: htmlunit Version : 2.9 Group : Development/Libraries License : ASL 2.0 URL : http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net/ Summary : A headless web browser for automated testing Description : HtmlUnit is a "GUI-Less browser for Java programs". It models HTML documents and provides an API for automated testing of web applications. SPEC: http://downloads.eucalyptus.com/devel/packages/fedora-16/SPECS/htmlunit.spec SRPM: http://downloads.eucalyptus.com/devel/packages/fedora-16/SRPMS/htmlunit-2.9-1.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766883] New: Review Request: gerris - computational fluid dynamics flow solver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gerris - computational fluid dynamics flow solver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766883 Summary: Review Request: gerris - computational fluid dynamics flow solver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonathan.underw...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jgu/gerris.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jgu/gerris-1.3.2-3.2023.el6.src.rpm Description: Gerris is an Open Source Free Software library for the solution of the partial differential equations describing fluid flow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766604] Review Request: Bashmount
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766604 Cédric OLIVIER changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cedric.oliv...@free.fr --- Comment #1 from Cédric OLIVIER 2011-12-12 13:35:02 EST --- * Could you move %defattr at the top of %files (it's a cosmetic change, but %defattr tends to be used at the top of %files) * Could you remove #Requires comments * Could you remove "bash" build requires dependencies and add udisks(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2) For URL project page, http://sourceforge.net/projects/bashmount/ seems to be more complete than https://gitorious.org/bashmount/bashmount -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766707] Review Request: perl-Devel-Comments - Debug with executable smart comments to logs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766707 Bug 766707 depends on bug 76, which changed state. Bug 76 Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Capture-Extended - Extend functionality of IO::Capture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=76 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766666] Review Request: perl-IO-Capture-Extended - Extend functionality of IO::Capture
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=76 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-IO-Capture-Extended-0. ||11-1.fc17 Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-12-12 12:02:21 --- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar 2011-12-12 12:02:21 EST --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766824] Review Request: kremotecontrol - KDE frontend for your remote controls
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766824 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997(kde-reviews), ||765955(kde-4.8) Alias||kremotecontrol --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2011-12-12 11:46:58 EST --- Another kdeutils split module -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766824] New: Review Request: kremotecontrol - KDE frontend for your remote controls
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kremotecontrol - KDE frontend for your remote controls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766824 Summary: Review Request: kremotecontrol - KDE frontend for your remote controls Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdie...@math.unl.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdeutils/kremotecontrol.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdeutils/kremotecontrol-4.7.90-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: KRemoteControl (formerly known as KDELirc) is a KDE frontend for your remote controls. It allows to configure actions for button presses on remotes. All types of remotes supported by the Solid module in the KDE platform are also supported by KRemoteControl (e.g. with the Linux Infrared Remote Control system (LIRC) as backend). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766666] Review Request: perl-IO-Capture-Extended - Extend functionality of IO::Capture
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=76 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2011-12-12 11:42:51 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766666] Review Request: perl-IO-Capture-Extended - Extend functionality of IO::Capture
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=76 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766666] Review Request: perl-IO-Capture-Extended - Extend functionality of IO::Capture
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=76 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar 2011-12-12 11:37:18 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-IO-Capture-Extended Short Description: Extend functionality of IO::Capture Owners: ppisar mmaslano psabata Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766666] Review Request: perl-IO-Capture-Extended - Extend functionality of IO::Capture
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=76 --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar 2011-12-12 11:39:00 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) > Issues: > [!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent. > Inform upstream about the incorrect FSF address in their license copy. Already reported: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=73197 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758166] [EPEL] - Review Request -- thrift 0.6.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758166 --- Comment #14 from Nelson Marques 2011-12-12 11:15:53 EST --- Tom, Fedora builds are way too problematic and have way too much stuff to fix... I can't work them on work time because the build requires internet connection for erlang and java modules, it's dumb enough not to read my proxies, so I will either need a fix or direct connection to the internet. Furthermore, if redhat-rpm-config is a BuildRequires, the build just fails on the tests. Thrift 0.8.0 does seem to require some work to build properly. I have no interest in delaying Thrift 0.6.1 in EPEL because of this Fedora build. Anyway we can keep moving with the EPEL build and neglect Fedora submission for some time so I contact upstream and deal with this properly ? NM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766666] Review Request: perl-IO-Capture-Extended - Extend functionality of IO::Capture
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=76
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata 2011-12-12 10:38:07 EST ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported architecture.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[-]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generates any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
/home/contyk/src/review/76/IO-Capture-Extended-0.11.tar.gz :
MD5SUM this package : 3886ef237c2ac96a844eac58d62b4ff8
MD5SUM upstream package : 3886ef237c2ac96a844eac58d62b4ff8
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[?]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
upstream.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[-]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[-]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.
Issues:
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
Inform upstream about the incorrect FSF address in their license copy.
Approving.
Generated by fedora-review 0.1.1
External plugins:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review m
[Bug 766707] Review Request: perl-Devel-Comments - Debug with executable smart comments to logs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766707 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 608852] Review Request: epris - a dbus service to listen to music
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608852 --- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla 2011-12-12 10:36:47 EST --- epris.spec:13: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 13, tab: line 4) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. I still get the bad URL error, but it's good, you might file an rpmlint bug. So it's just the above, which is cosmetic. And you are sponsored now, correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747659] Review Request: proxool - Java connection pool library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747659 --- Comment #5 from Andy Grimm 2011-12-12 10:39:19 EST --- The maintainer has updated the license to ASL 2.0, and I've fixed the other issues noted. I will add the POM file to my own proxool branch in github and will send him a merge request. New URLs: SPEC: http://downloads.eucalyptus.com/devel/packages/fedora-16/SPECS/proxool.spec SRPM: http://downloads.eucalyptus.com/devel/packages/fedora-16/SRPMS/proxool-0.9.1-4.fc16.src.rpm Thanks for reviewing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 754137] Review Request: nagios-plugins-bdii - Nagios Probe for the BDII
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754137 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12 10:32:48 EST --- nagios-plugins-bdii-1.0.14-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nagios-plugins-bdii-1.0.14-1.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 754137] Review Request: nagios-plugins-bdii - Nagios Probe for the BDII
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754137 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12 10:26:55 EST --- nagios-plugins-bdii-1.0.14-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nagios-plugins-bdii-1.0.14-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 754137] Review Request: nagios-plugins-bdii - Nagios Probe for the BDII
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754137 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766707] New: Review Request: perl-Devel-Comments - Debug with executable smart comments to logs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Comments - Debug with executable smart comments to logs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766707 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Comments - Debug with executable smart comments to logs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Devel-Comments/perl-Devel-Comments.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Devel-Comments/perl-Devel-Comments-1.1.4-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Devel::Comments is a source filter for your Perl code, intended to be used only during development. Specially-formatted 'smart' comments are replaced by executable code to dump variables to screen or to file, display loop progress bars, or enforce conditions. These smart comments can all be disabled at once by commenting out the "use Devel::Comments" line, whereupon they return to being simple, dumb comments. Your debugging code can remain in place, guaranteed harmless, ready for the next development cycle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 754137] Review Request: nagios-plugins-bdii - Nagios Probe for the BDII
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754137 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2011-12-12 10:20:52 EST --- nagios-plugins-bdii-1.0.14-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nagios-plugins-bdii-1.0.14-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766666] Review Request: perl-IO-Capture-Extended - Extend functionality of IO::Capture
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=76 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||766707 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766707] Review Request: perl-Devel-Comments - Debug with executable smart comments to logs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766707 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||76 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 752169] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-zukitwo - The Zukitwo GTK and GNOME Shell theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752169 --- Comment #13 from Mohamed El Morabity 2011-12-12 10:19:54 EST --- (In reply to comment #12) > By the way, since the name of the package has changed, should I file a new > review request or can I go on with this one? You can go on with this one, you just have to edit the title of the bug report to reflect the new name of the .spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 752169] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-zukitwo - The Zukitwo GTK and GNOME Shell theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752169 --- Comment #12 from Mattia Meneguzzo 2011-12-12 10:11:17 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) > This is an example of how the splitting can be achieved: >http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/zukitwo/zukitwo.spec (In reply to comment #11) > In a such a case, the timestamp of the archive should be used as a version; > this should be here 20111205, for example. Thank you, Tim and Mohamed. Here's the new version of the package, corrected according to your valuable suggestions: Spec URL: http://db.tt/NHscmjFS SRPM URL: http://db.tt/wf9g2TAC By the way, since the name of the package has changed, should I file a new review request or can I go on with this one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
