[Bug 771171] New: Review Request: django-tastypie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: django-tastypie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771171 Summary: Review Request: django-tastypie Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bkab...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Tastypie is an webservice API framework for Django. It provides a convenient, yet powerful and highly customizable, abstraction for creating REST-style interfaces. SPEC: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/django-tastypie/django-tastypie.spec SRPM: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/django-tastypie/django-tastypie-0.9.11-1.fc17.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3613483 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 749885] Review Request: iris - A library for working with the XMPP/Jabber protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749885 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #34 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2012-01-02 04:48:56 EST --- Rex, please excuse me for the so long time silence. End or year was very-very hot for me on my workplace. $ rpmlint iris-1.0.0-0.8.20110904svn812.fc16.src.rpm iris.src:77: W: configure-without-libdir-spec iris.src:27: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 27) iris.src: W: invalid-url Source0: iris-1.0.0-r812.tar.gz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Mix of space trivial to fix. Other issues lifted. So, PACKAGE APPROVED. P.S. Again sorry for such long delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 771111] Review Request: ovirt-engine-sdk - SDK for oVirt-Engine platform
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=77 --- Comment #13 from Ofer Schreiber 2012-01-02 04:57:05 EST --- I've uploaded a new TAR/SRPM/SPEC into http://oschreib.fedorapeople.org/ovirt-engine-sdk/ with fixes for all the issues mentioned above. upstream notified about the licensing issues, I hope to get a new license files soon (and a official tarball release as well). Few questions/notes: 1. I've noticed that after removing the BuildArch, rpmlint complains "E: no-binary", is that OK? 2. About the unowned dir: I thought that specifying a dir name without the "dir" prefix includes the dir with all the content inside. after fixing that, rpmbuild complains "warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk", is that OK? 3. About *-devel naming: the upstream project is called "ovirt-engine-sdk", So I thought it's the right name for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738590] Review request: rubygem-gettext_i18n_rails - Simple FastGettext Rails integration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738590
--- Comment #7 from Bohuslav Kabrda 2012-01-02 05:13:45
EST ---
- The license has been clarified - the gettext_i18n_rails is now the official
upstream and the problematic license note has been removed from
ruby_gettext_extractor.rb, so everything is now under Public Domain.
- I moved the %{geminstdir}/init.rb to -doc subpackage as suggested, the
package works fine without it.
- I also upgraded to the newest version and fixed dependencies accordingly.
SPEC:
http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/gettext_i18n_rails/rubygem-gettext_i18n_rails.spec
SRPM:
http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/gettext_i18n_rails/rubygem-gettext_i18n_rails-0.3.6-1.fc17.src.rpm
Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3613621
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742388] Review Request: polybori - Framework for Boolean Rings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742388
Brendan Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #11 from Brendan Jones 2012-01-02
05:33:33 EST ---
Hi Jerry,
Now all good. This package is APPROVED
Required
+ - OK
- - N/A
X - attention
? - comment please
[+] named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
[+] The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec
[+] Meet the Packaging Guidelines
unless building for F12 and below or EPEL
[+] Be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing
Guidelines
[+] The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license
[+] License file must be included in %doc
[+] The spec file must be written in American English
[+] The spec file for the package MUST be legible
[+] The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source
266218f3ccee05854dac6ea3e68ddbc570c16c45
rpmbuild/SOURCES/polybori-0.8.0.tar.gz
[+] Successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary
architecture
[-] Proper use of ExcludeArch
[+] All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
[-] The spec file MUST handle locales properly
[+] Shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's
default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun
[+] Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries
[-] If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this
fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation
of that specific package
[+] A package must own all directories that it creates
directories under this
[+] A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings
[+] Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] Each package must consistently use macros
[+] The package must contain code, or permissable content
[+] Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage
[+] If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application
[+] Header files must be in a -devel package
[+] Static libraries must be in a -static package
[+] library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package
[+] devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency
[+] Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives
[+] GUI apps must include a %{name}.desktop file, properly installed with
desktop-file-install in the %install section
[+] Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages
[+] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8
[+] Has BuildRequires: python2-devel and/or python3-devel
[-] Python eggs must be built from source. They cannot simply drop an egg from
upstream into the proper directory.
[+] Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[-] If egg-info files are generated by the modules build scripts they must be
included in the package.
[-] When building a compat package, it must install using easy_install -m so it
won't conflict with the main package.
[-] When building multiple versions (for a compat package) one of the packages
must contain a default version that is usable via "import MODULE" with no prior
setup.
[-] A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[+] Requires OK
[-] Egg install:
%install
%{__python} setup.py install --skip-build --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Should Items
[-] the packager SHOULD query upstream for any missing license text files to
include it
[-] Non-English language support for description and summary sections in the
package spec if available
[+] The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock
[+] The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures
[-] The reviewer should test that the package functions as described
[+] If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane
[+] Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using
a fully versioned dependency
Do you need an explicit Requires: apron-debug in package ocaml-apron-debug?
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) should usually be placed in a -devel pkg
[-] If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file
instead of the file itself
[+] Should contain man pages for binaries/scripts
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
[Bug 755510] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet - Gnome shell system monitor extension
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755510 --- Comment #9 from nicolas.vievi...@univ-valenciennes.fr 2012-01-02 06:44:54 EST --- Hello, First, happy new year 2012 to Fedora's community! As usual, new SPEC and SRPMS files according to the last upstream release. New rpmlint reports provided too. Caution: according to the new naming scheme dealing with git commits, previous SRPMS files are no longer available on my dropbox shared folder. I've also added links to the RPMS files to ease largest testing and installing this gnome-shell extension. F-16 Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25699833/Fedora/F-16/gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet/gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet.spec F-16 SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25699833/Fedora/F-16/gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet/gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet-1.99-0.1.git8149a27.fc16.src.rpm F-16 RPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25699833/Fedora/F-16/gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet/gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet-1.99-0.1.git8149a27.fc16.noarch.rpm F-17 Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25699833/Fedora/Rawhide/gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet/gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet.spec F-17 SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25699833/Fedora/Rawhide/gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet/gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet-1.99-0.1.git8149a27.fc17.src.rpm F-17 RPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25699833/Fedora/Rawhide/gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet/gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet-1.99-0.1.git8149a27.fc17.noarch.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/paradoxxxzero/gnome-shell-system-monitor-applet $ rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet.spec gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: paradoxxxzero-gnome-shell-system-monitor-applet-1.99-93-g8149a27.tar.gz 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet-1.99-0.1.git8149a27.fc16.src.rpm gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet.src: W: invalid-url Source0: paradoxxxzero-gnome-shell-system-monitor-applet-1.99-93-g8149a27.tar.gz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet.spec gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: paradoxxxzero-gnome-shell-system-monitor-applet-1.99-93-g8149a27.tar.gz 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet-1.99-0.1.git8149a27.fc17.src.rpm gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet.src: W: invalid-url Source0: paradoxxxzero-gnome-shell-system-monitor-applet-1.99-93-g8149a27.tar.gz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Any comment are welcome! Cordially, -- NVieville -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736262] Review Request: proxyfuzz - man-in-the-middle non-deterministic network fuzzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736262 Petr Sklenar changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(mno...@redhat.com ||) --- Comment #8 from Petr Sklenar 2012-01-02 07:27:08 EST --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/psklenar/pub/proxyfuzz/proxyfuzz.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/psklenar/pub/proxyfuzz/proxyfuzz-20110923-1.fc14.src.rpm mock -r fedora-16-x86_64 ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/proxyfuzz-20110923-1.fc14.src.rpm # progress seems good, results in : http://people.redhat.com/psklenar/pub/proxyfuzz/mock-result/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 768976] Review Request: perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie - Encrypted cookie-based session back-end for Dancer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768976 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 768976] Review Request: perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie - Encrypted cookie-based session back-end for Dancer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768976 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar 2012-01-02 07:33:59 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Dancer-Session-Cookie Short Description: Encrypted cookie-based session back-end for Dancer Owners: ppisar mmaslano psabata Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 769444] Review Request: korundum - Ruby bindings for KDE libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769444 --- Comment #6 from Jaroslav Reznik 2012-01-02 07:38:03 EST --- The package is ok from the kde/qt packaging view. Already packaged in Fedora, this is a split of previously monolithic kdebindings package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 769444] Review Request: korundum - Ruby bindings for KDE libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769444 Bohuslav Kabrda changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bkab...@redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Bohuslav Kabrda 2012-01-02 07:41:58 EST --- Ok, since there are no other blockers, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 767583] Review Request: python-poppler-qt4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767583 --- Comment #14 from Brendan Jones 2012-01-02 08:56:48 EST --- Thanks for that, I have updated in rawhide, Will issue and update for the other branches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 738590] Review request: rubygem-gettext_i18n_rails - Simple FastGettext Rails integration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738590 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Vít Ondruch 2012-01-02 10:02:07 EST --- rpmlint reports following warning: rubygem-gettext_i18n_rails.src: W: strange-permission rubygem-gettext_i18n_rails.spec 0666L A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. * Please consider removing of "Requires: rubygem(gettext)", since it is rails application development dependency, not a runtime think. * Similarly "Requires: rubygem(ruby_parser)" should be removed for the same reason. Unfortunately, this dependency is now enforced by upstream. I have already opened issue [1] because of this. Nevertheless, since these are just minor nits, I APPROVE the package. Please fix them before commit if possible. [1] https://github.com/grosser/gettext_i18n_rails/issues/49 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 770721] Review Request: substance - Swing look-and-feel library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770721 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: substance |Review Request: substance - ||Swing look-and-feel library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 770615] Review Request: baobab - A graphical directory tree analyzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770615 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|baobab - A graphical |Review Request: baobab - A |directory tree analyzer |graphical directory tree ||analyzer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 771070] Review Request: nwipe - Securely erase disks using a variety of recognized methods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771070 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2012-01-02 10:06:23 EST --- Ivan: if you are going to review this, then please set the status, assigned to and fedora-review flags accordingly. ** The reason why the build fails is revealed from root.log: DEBUG util.py:257: warning: group taurus does not exist - using root DEBUG util.py:257: ## DEBUG util.py:257: error: unpacking of archive failed on file /builddir/build/SOURCES/nwipe-0.05.tar.gz;4f012b0b: cpio: MD5 sum mismatch I guess this is because new versions of rpm use sha1 sums instead of md5 sums, so the srpm should be created with md5 checksum. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 755291] Review Request: mod_pagespeed - Page Speed is an open-source project started at Google to help developers optimize their web pages by applying web performance best practices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755291 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: | - | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 754246] Review Request: TV-Browser - A TV Browsing application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754246 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: TV-Browser |Review Request: TV-Browser ||- A TV Browsing application -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 771070] Review Request: nwipe - Securely erase disks using a variety of recognized methods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771070 --- Comment #8 from Ivan Romanov 2012-01-02 10:32:24 EST --- Hm ... how do I make such rpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 757657] Review Request: perl-Wx-Scintilla - Scintilla source code editing component for wxWidgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757657 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Mašláňová 2012-01-02 11:06:11 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) New version of the specfile. http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Wx-Scintilla.spec > Source tar ball is original. Ok. > Summary verified from lib/Wx/Scintilla.pm. Ok. > > FIX: License tag does not cover bundled Scintilla sources > (wx-scintilla/src/scintilla/). I can attach an email from the upstream if comments in the specfile are not enough. > FIX: Do not bundle Scintilla (wx-scintilla/src/scintilla/). Scintilla must be bundled. According to upstream development of the main source is slow and it doesn't have some features, which they need. So, they've also changed some files for specific usage in Padre. qtscintilla made the same thing, but for their own use. Another reason is the portability. > > TODO: Augment description with other paragraphs from lib/Wx/Scintilla.pm POD. > The first one does not define what this package delivers. Fixed. > > FIX: Build-require perl(Exporter) (lib/Wx/Scintilla/Constant.pm:12) > FIX: Build-require perl(Caro) (lib/Wx/Scintilla.pm:6) > FIX: Build-require perl(XSLoader) (lib/Wx/Scintilla.pm:8) > > FIX: Build-require perl(base) (t/lib/Tests_Helper.pm:197) > FIX: Build-require perl(Wx::App) (t/lib/Tests_Helper.pm:197) > FIX: Build-require perl(Wx::Frame) (t/lib/Tests_Helper.pm:218) > FIX: Build-require perl(Wx::Event) (t/03_editor.t:27) > FIX: Build-require perl(lib) (t/02_inheritance.t:10) > Fixed. > TODO: Do not %doc-package META.json (as you do not package META.yml) > Fixed. > All tests pass. Ok. > > $ rpmlint perl-Wx-Scintilla.spec > ../SRPMS/perl-Wx-Scintilla-0.34-1.fc17.src.rpm > ../RPMS/x86_64/perl-Wx-Scintilla-* > perl-Wx-Scintilla.spec:22: W: comparison-operator-in-deptoken font(:lang=en) > perl-Wx-Scintilla.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) wxWidgets -> caskets, > gaskets, casket's > perl-Wx-Scintilla.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US StyledTextCtrl > perl-Wx-Scintilla.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wxWidgets -> > caskets, gaskets, casket's > perl-Wx-Scintilla.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US timeline -> > time > line, time-line, timberline > perl-Wx-Scintilla.src:22: W: comparison-operator-in-deptoken font(:lang=en) > perl-Wx-Scintilla.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) wxWidgets -> > caskets, gaskets, casket's > perl-Wx-Scintilla.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US > StyledTextCtrl > perl-Wx-Scintilla.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wxWidgets -> > caskets, gaskets, casket's > perl-Wx-Scintilla.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US timeline -> > time line, time-line, timberline > perl-Wx-Scintilla.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides > /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Wx/Scintilla/Scintilla.so > Scintilla.so()(64bit) > perl-Wx-Scintilla.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides > /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Wx/Scintilla/libwx_gtk2u_scintilla-2.8.so > libwx_gtk2u_scintilla-2.8.so()(64bit) > perl-Wx-Scintilla.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides > /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Wx/Scintilla/Scintilla.so > Scintilla.so()(64bit) > perl-Wx-Scintilla.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides > /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Wx/Scintilla/libwx_gtk2u_scintilla-2.8.so > libwx_gtk2u_scintilla-2.8.so()(64bit) > perl-Wx-Scintilla.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath > /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Wx/Scintilla/ ['$ORIGIN'] > perl-Wx-Scintilla-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources > 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 14 warnings. > > FIX: Do not provide private libraries (unbundle or use %perl_default_filter). Filter is used. > FIX: Do not set RPATH in Scintilla.so (unbundle or use > LDFLAGS+=--enable-new-dtags to convert RPATH to RUN_PATH). I guess RPATH is not a problem here. They are using the bundled version, so they want to use this specific Scintilla.so. > > TODO: You can package some tools/*. Not sure if they are useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 770174] Review Request: kde-partitionmanager - GUI for managing disk partitions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770174 --- Comment #14 from Mattia 2012-01-02 11:37:59 EST --- > > This looks good now -> approved! > > If you create a FAS account (if you've not done so already) and let me know > your FAS login then I'll sponsor you. > > Regards, > > Hans > > p.s. > > I guess you should drop the chmod -x I made you add, given Kevin comments. > Please do this either before importing the package into git, or change it in > git before building the package. Thank you all, I will correct the SRPM before importing it into git. My FAS login is "mattia" (I really lack fantasy). After being sponsored I think I must apply for ownership of the package: can I do that directly in the Fedora Package Database web interface or should I use this bug as described in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#Package_Change_Requests_for_existing_packages ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 770174] Review Request: kde-partitionmanager - GUI for managing disk partitions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770174 --- Comment #15 from Rex Dieter 2012-01-02 12:04:37 EST --- that's correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 771230] New: Review Request: gemrb - GemRB is a port of BioWare's Infinity Engine-based games, fine RPGs like Baldur's Gate, Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn, Icewind Dale, Icewind Dale II and Pl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gemrb - GemRB is a port of BioWare's Infinity Engine-based games, fine RPGs like Baldur's Gate, Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn, Icewind Dale, Icewind Dale II and Planescape: Torment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771230 Summary: Review Request: gemrb - GemRB is a port of BioWare's Infinity Engine-based games, fine RPGs like Baldur's Gate, Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn, Icewind Dale, Icewind Dale II and Planescape: Torment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: schluss...@schlussarz.pl QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://db.tt/2pM55Q4X SRPM URL: http://db.tt/mEJ8jLi3 Description: FE-NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 771231] New: Review Request: gemrb - GemRB is a port of BioWare's Infinity Engine-based games, fine RPGs like Baldur's Gate, Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn, Icewind Dale, Icewind Dale II and Pl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gemrb - GemRB is a port of BioWare's Infinity Engine-based games, fine RPGs like Baldur's Gate, Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn, Icewind Dale, Icewind Dale II and Planescape: Torment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771231 Summary: Review Request: gemrb - GemRB is a port of BioWare's Infinity Engine-based games, fine RPGs like Baldur's Gate, Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn, Icewind Dale, Icewind Dale II and Planescape: Torment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: schluss...@schlussarz.pl QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://db.tt/2pM55Q4X SRPM URL: http://db.tt/mEJ8jLi3 Description: FE-NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 771230] Review Request: gemrb - GemRB is a port of BioWare's Infinity Engine-based games, fine RPGs like Baldur's Gate, Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn, Icewind Dale, Icewind Dale II and Planesc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771230 --- Comment #1 from Schlussarz 2012-01-02 12:28:20 EST --- *** Bug 771231 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 771231] Review Request: gemrb - GemRB is a port of BioWare's Infinity Engine-based games, fine RPGs like Baldur's Gate, Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn, Icewind Dale, Icewind Dale II and Planesc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771231 Schlussarz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE Last Closed||2012-01-02 12:28:19 --- Comment #1 from Schlussarz 2012-01-02 12:28:19 EST --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 771230 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 749885] Review Request: iris - A library for working with the XMPP/Jabber protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749885 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #35 from Rex Dieter 2012-01-02 12:46:44 EST --- Thanks! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: iris Short Description: A library for working with the XMPP/Jabber protocol Owners: rdieter Branches: f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 769444] Review Request: ruby-korundum - Ruby bindings for KDE libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769444 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: korundum - |Review Request: |Ruby bindings for KDE |ruby-korundum - Ruby |libraries |bindings for KDE libraries Alias||ruby-korundum Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter 2012-01-02 13:23:34 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ruby-korundum Short Description: Ruby bindings for KDE libraries Owners: than jreznik ltinkl rnovacek rdieter kkofler Branches: f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 771233] New: Review Request: rubygem-rack-protection - Ruby gem that protects against typical web attacks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rack-protection - Ruby gem that protects against typical web attacks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771233 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rack-protection - Ruby gem that protects against typical web attacks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mfoj...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://omicron.mifo.sk/rubygem-rack-protection.spec SRPM URL: http://omicron.mifo.sk/rubygem-rack-protection-1.2.0-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: This gem protects against typical web attacks. Should work for all Rack apps, including Rails. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 771233] Review Request: rubygem-rack-protection - Ruby gem that protects against typical web attacks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771233 --- Comment #1 from Michal Fojtik 2012-01-02 13:44:23 EST --- This package is need for updating Sinatra to 1.3.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 768500] Review Request: subscription-manager - Tools and libraries for subscription and repository management.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768500
Lukáš Zapletal changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||l...@redhat.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|l...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Lukáš Zapletal 2012-01-02 14:02:36 EST ---
Taking the review.
First look:
rpmlint subscription-manager-0.99.2-1.fc16.src.rpm
subscription-manager.src:11: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
subscription-manager.src:11: W: macro-in-comment %{release}
subscription-manager.src:162: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{_prefix}/lib/yum-plugins/subscription-manager.py*
subscription-manager.src:163: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{_prefix}/lib/yum-plugins/product-id.py*
subscription-manager.src:164: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{_prefix}/lib/yum-plugins/katello.py*
subscription-manager.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
subscription-manager-0.99.2.tar.gz
All errors and warning above are properly commented in the spec and are not
problems. Formal review will follow later on.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 771237] New: Review Request: rubygem-showoff - Ruby web app that reads simple configuration files for a presentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-showoff - Ruby web app that reads simple configuration files for a presentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771237 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-showoff - Ruby web app that reads simple configuration files for a presentation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mfoj...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://omicron.mifo.sk/rubygem-showoff.spec SRPM URL: http://omicron.mifo.sk/rubygem-showoff-0.0.7-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: ShowOff is a Sinatra web app that reads simple configuration files for a presentation. It is sort of like a Keynote web app engine - think S5 + Slidedown. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 768500] Review Request: subscription-manager - Tools and libraries for subscription and repository management.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768500 Lukáš Zapletal changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Lukáš Zapletal 2012-01-02 14:27:19 EST --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3614692 FORMAL REVIEW MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] The LICENSE file is missing, distribution for all subpackages is recommended. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. I would suggest to add one line instructing user to install tito, not all of use know what tito is. Not a blocker. Excelent work for such a complicated package, only minor points. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 768500] Review Request: subscription-manager - Tools and libraries for subscription and repository management.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768500 Lukáš Zapletal changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|l...@redhat.com |dgood...@redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Lukáš Zapletal 2012-01-02 14:31:07 EST --- Devan, please fix the minor issue (LICENSE file distribution) before you commit to the distgit. *** PACKAGE IS APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 768500] Review Request: subscription-manager - Tools and libraries for subscription and repository management.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768500
--- Comment #4 from Lukáš Zapletal 2012-01-02 14:35:29 EST ---
For completeness I am attaching rpmlint for binaries:
subscription-manager-firstboot.i686: W: no-documentation
subscription-manager-gnome.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/pam.d/subscription-manager-gui
subscription-manager-gnome.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/security/console.apps/subscription-manager-gui
subscription-manager.src:11: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
subscription-manager.src:11: W: macro-in-comment %{release}
subscription-manager.src:162: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{_prefix}/lib/yum-plugins/subscription-manager.py*
subscription-manager.src:163: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{_prefix}/lib/yum-plugins/product-id.py*
subscription-manager.src:164: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{_prefix}/lib/yum-plugins/katello.py*
subscription-manager.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
subscription-manager-0.99.2.tar.gz
subscription-manager.i686: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
subscription-manager.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/bash_completion.d/subscription-manager
subscription-manager.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/security/console.apps/subscription-manager
subscription-manager.i686: W: no-dependency-on usermode
subscription-manager.i686: W: manual-page-warning
/usr/share/man/man8/subscription-manager.8.gz 672: warning: macro `pp' not
defined
subscription-manager.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/pam.d/subscription-manager
subscription-manager.i686: W: service-default-enabled
/etc/rc.d/init.d/rhsmcertd
subscription-manager.i686: W: incoherent-init-script-name rhsmcertd
('subscription-manager', 'subscription-managerd')
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 14 warnings.
No blockers.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 765651] Review Request: asterisk-gui - Graphical interface for Asterisk configuration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765651 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2012-01-02 14:54:39 EST --- asterisk-gui-2.0-3.20111230svn5218.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #21 from Shawn Starr 2012-01-02 15:06:30 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-addressable Short Description: Improved URI/URL handling Owners: spstarr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728088] Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 --- Comment #18 from Shawn Starr 2012-01-02 15:07:26 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-idn Short Description: Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library Owners: spstarr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #11 from Ryan H. Lewis (rhl) 2012-01-02 15:16:32 EST --- "P.S. Spec file formatted by tabs with 5 space width ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PavelAlexeev/tabsize ). Please, do not start review if it is a problem for you." Make it so that I don't need to do this. I should be able to view the spec file so that it is legible: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Spec_Legibility I'm not modifying my tabsize to deal with your spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 598860] Review Request: httpd-itk - MPM Itk for Apache HTTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 --- Comment #12 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2012-01-02 15:26:11 EST --- How I can known what tab size you are using? Now, today, tomorrow?? May be we start real work? Or do not start it. I'm ready continue this discussion if you want, but I think mail list or private conversation, forum or jabber will be much more appropriate place for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700350] Review Request: perl-CGI-Session-Driver-memcached - CGI::Session driver for memcached
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700350 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-CGI-Session-Driver-mem ||cached-0.04-2.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2012-01-02 16:48:27 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2012-01-02 16:48:27 EST --- perl-CGI-Session-Driver-memcached-0.04-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700344] Review Request: perl-Authen-CAS-Client - Interface for authentication via JA-SIG's Central Authentication Service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700344 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Authen-CAS-Client-0.05 ||-2.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2012-01-02 16:49:31 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2012-01-02 16:49:31 EST --- perl-Authen-CAS-Client-0.05-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 721179] Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721179 Shawn Starr changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review- --- Comment #28 from Shawn Starr 2012-01-02 16:49:37 EST --- Change flag from + -> - we're not done reviewing yet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 721179] Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721179 --- Comment #27 from Shawn Starr 2012-01-02 16:47:09 EST --- Updated, bumped to 0.9.15 also. See updates spec: Spec URL: http://www.sh0n.net/spstarr/fedora/rubygem-extlib/rubygem-extlib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.sh0n.net/spstarr/fedora/rubygem-extlib/rubygem-extlib-0.9.15-2.fc17.src.rpm rpmlint: PASS (with usual ruby doc warnings) mock build: PASS Please re-review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 758470] Review Request: vmmlib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758470 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||vmmlib-1.0-0.2.rc1.fc16 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2012-01-02 16:55:35 EST --- vmmlib-1.0-0.2.rc1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700352] Review Request: perl-DublinCore-Record - Container for Dublin Core metadata elements
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700352 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-DublinCore-Record-0.03 ||-2.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2012-01-02 16:53:54 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2012-01-02 16:53:54 EST --- perl-DublinCore-Record-0.03-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700354] Review Request: perl-Locale-Currency-Format - Perl functions for formatting monetary values
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700354 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Locale-Currency-Format ||-1.30-1.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2012-01-02 16:50:58 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2012-01-02 16:50:58 EST --- perl-Locale-Currency-Format-1.30-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700349] Review Request: perl-Biblio-EndnoteStyle - Reference formatting using Endnote-like templates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700349 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Biblio-EndnoteStyle-0. ||05-2.fc16 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2012-01-02 16:56:12 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2012-01-02 16:56:12 EST --- perl-Biblio-EndnoteStyle-0.05-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766932] Review Request: icfg - utiltiy for scriptable editing of network interface files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766932 --- Comment #7 from Jon Masters 2012-01-02 17:19:43 EST --- I am presently completing the review, sorry about that. Should have some comments for you in a few. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 771252] New: Review Request: cinnamon - Window management and application launching for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cinnamon - Window management and application launching for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771252 Summary: Review Request: cinnamon - Window management and application launching for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: leigh123li...@googlemail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/cinnamon/1/cinnamon.spec SRPM URL: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/cinnamon/1/cinnamon-1.1.3-1.fc16.src.rpm Cinnamon provides core user interface functions for the GNOME 3 desktop, like switching to windows and launching applications. Cinnamon takes advantage of the capabilities of modern graphics hardware and introduces innovative user interface concepts to provide a visually attractive and easy to use experience. The desktop layout is similar to Gnome 2. The underlying technology is forked from Gnome Shell.e> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 771254] New: Review Request: libva-vdpau-driver - HW video decode support for VDPAU platforms
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libva-vdpau-driver - HW video decode support for VDPAU platforms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771254 Summary: Review Request: libva-vdpau-driver - HW video decode support for VDPAU platforms Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwiz...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/libva-vdpau-driver.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/libva-vdpau-driver-0.7.3-2.fc16.src.rpm Description: HW video decode support for VDPAU platforms This package is a bridge between vdpau and vaapi, there is no actual hardware back-end provided here. (instead a given back-end may rely on this package to HW decode a video stream from a VA-API enabled player) There seem to have proof of concept of a vdpau backend for an open source driver (untested yet) http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~emericg So that make the package interest to rise up for fedora itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 519652] Review Request: sabnzbdplus - Heavily Featured Automatic Binary Newsgrabber
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519652 Major Hayden changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ma...@mhtx.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 519652] Review Request: sabnzbdplus - Heavily Featured Automatic Binary Newsgrabber
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519652 Major Hayden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ma...@mhtx.net Flag||needinfo?(kon...@tylerc.org ||) --- Comment #10 from Major Hayden 2012-01-02 18:13:39 EST --- Conrad - Are you still working on this package? If not, I'll be glad to pick it up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 519652] Review Request: sabnzbdplus - Heavily Featured Automatic Binary Newsgrabber
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519652 Conrad Meyer changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(kon...@tylerc.org | |) | --- Comment #11 from Conrad Meyer 2012-01-02 18:17:59 EST --- Still waiting for a review ;-). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766932] Review Request: icfg - utiltiy for scriptable editing of network interface files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766932
--- Comment #8 from Jon Masters 2012-01-02 18:26:48 EST ---
Terje raised the main issues I had already. Python dep might be extraneous.
Also very unlikely but I'm honestly not sure if SysV is a legacy trademark. Its
use is so profuse that I don't intend to object to it, just mention it here.
Summary: I think otherwise this package is ready, so it passes review. However
I am unable to set the flag (due to a quirk of BZ) so I filed a request with
rel-eng just now that they do so on my behalf.
Review
--
* PASS: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces
- The output pertains to a few false-positive spelling "errors", none
of
which are actual errors. Therefore this part of the test is passed.
** The output should be posted in the review:
$ rpmlint icfg-0.9-1.fc15.src.rpm
icfg.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sysconfig -> configure
icfg.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kickstart -> kick start,
kick-start, kicks tart
icfg.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scriptable -> scrip table,
scrip-table, script able
icfg.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sed -> tied, ed, seed
icfg.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US awk -> awl, aw, wk
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
$ rpmlint icfg-0.9-1.fc16.noarch.rpm
icfg.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sysconfig -> configure
icfg.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kickstart -> kick start,
kick-start, kicks tart
icfg.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scriptable -> scrip table,
scrip-table, script able
icfg.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sed -> tied, ed, seed
icfg.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US awk -> awl, aw, wk
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
(additionally no errors detected during package build)
* The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines: PASS
* The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.spec unles your
package has an exemption: PASS
* The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines
- Naming guidelines already confirmed
- Version and Release is consistent
- License is consistent with FPG
- Package is useful without external bits (just scripts, NA)
- No inclusion of pre-built binaries or libraries (noarch scripts!)
- Obfuscated Code Contest: not entered. SPEC is clean.
- Architecture support: noarch, and not limited
- FHS: use seems to be consistent
- Libexec: not applicable
- /run: not applicable
- Binaries not dependent upon separate libraries: correct
- rpmlint has already been run (above)
- Changelogs: appear to be correct
- No use of deprecated packager tag
- No use of deprecated vendor tag
- No use of deprecated copyright tag
- Summary does not end in a period
- No use of pre-requires
- Source URL is correct and works
- Buildroot tag is allowed and ignored
- Clean section is present and allowed
- No build requires
- No use of pre-requires
- No use of file requires
- Assume python binary dep not automatic??? (check)
- No use of autogenerated provide filtering
- Exception not applicable
- Summary: seems concise and reasonable
- Description: seems fine, is "SysV" a trademark?
- Encoding: meets the requirement for ASCII
- Documentation: is included using correct macro
- Compiler flags: not applicable
- PIE: not applicable
- Debuginfo packages: not applicable
- Devel packages: not applicable
- Pkgconfig files: not applicable
- Requiring base package: not applicable
- Shared libraries: not applicable
- Packaging static libraries: not applicable
- Statically linking executables: not applicable
- Duplication of system libraries: not appliable
- Beware of Rpath: not applicable
- Configuration files: not applicable
- Configuration of package managers: not applicable
- Systemd: not a startup service and not applicable
- Initscripts: not applicable
- Desktop files: not applicable
- Macro use is consistent
- Correct use of RPM_BUILD_ROOT macros
- No use of makeinstall macro (correct)
- No macros used in Summary and Description
- No improper use of _sourcedir macro
- No local or global macro defines
- No locale translations
- Preserve file timestamps - install command does so
- Parallel make is not applicable
- Scriptlets are not used
- Transactions are not manipulated
- Condition
[Bug 766932] Review Request: icfg - utiltiy for scriptable editing of network interface files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766932 --- Comment #9 from Jon Masters 2012-01-02 18:28:30 EST --- Apologies for the delay in completing this. If you need any further assistance, I'll endeavor to turn it around swiftly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 722640] Review Request: R-qcc - SQC package for R
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722640 John J. McDonough changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 519652] Review Request: sabnzbdplus - Heavily Featured Automatic Binary Newsgrabber
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519652 --- Comment #12 from Major Hayden 2012-01-02 20:42:39 EST --- I'm not a reviewer but I'll give the package a look and try to find someone to review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 519652] Review Request: sabnzbdplus - Heavily Featured Automatic Binary Newsgrabber
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519652 Major Hayden changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|ma...@mhtx.net |nob...@fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766932] Review Request: icfg - utiltiy for scriptable editing of network interface files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766932 --- Comment #11 from Neil Horman 2012-01-02 21:13:44 EST --- nm, seems I'm able to do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766932] Review Request: icfg - utiltiy for scriptable editing of network interface files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766932 Neil Horman changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766932] Review Request: icfg - utiltiy for scriptable editing of network interface files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766932 --- Comment #10 from Neil Horman 2012-01-02 21:12:32 EST --- Thank you, Jon, I appreciate the review. Terje's notes have been incorporated into the package already, and it appears that you have not other objections. If you could please set the fedora review flag to + so that I can get the SCM request submitted, I'd appreciate it. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766932] Review Request: icfg - utiltiy for scriptable editing of network interface files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766932 Neil Horman changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Neil Horman 2012-01-02 21:16:35 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: icfg Short Description: sysv network configuration file command line editor Owners: nhor...@redhat.com, agosp...@redhat.com Branches: rawhide, fc16 InitialCC: nhor...@redhat.com, agosp...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766932] Review Request: icfg - utiltiy for scriptable editing of network interface files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766932 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co ||m) --- Comment #13 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2012-01-02 21:22:24 EST --- owners must be your fedora account username (fas) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 766932] Review Request: icfg - utiltiy for scriptable editing of network interface files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766932 --- Comment #14 from Jon Masters 2012-01-02 21:28:43 EST --- Yea, per my email I was unable to set it as I have a BZ account (j...@redhat.com) that differs from my personal Fedora information and the various systems really don't like that. I guess I might just set everything to j...@redhat.com eventually. I filed a ticket before so I assume they'll just close that since you were able to set the flags now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742388] Review Request: polybori - Framework for Boolean Rings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742388 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Jerry James 2012-01-02 22:56:20 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: polybori Short Description: Framework for Boolean Rings Owners: jjames Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 770695] Review Request: bengali-typing-booster - Bengali typing booster tables for ibus indic table
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770695 Pravin Satpute changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-01-03 00:22:12 --- Comment #5 from Pravin Satpute 2012-01-03 00:22:12 EST --- Thanks Jon for git Built for master, f16 and f15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 755275] Review Request: CSSLint - Detecting potential problems in CSS code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755275 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2012-01-03 01:39:19 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: csslint Short Description: Detecting potential problems in CSS code Owners: Branches: f15 f16 el5 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 771295] New: Review Request: rubygem-delorean - lets you travel in time with Ruby by mocking Time.now
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-delorean - lets you travel in time with Ruby by mocking Time.now https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771295 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-delorean - lets you travel in time with Ruby by mocking Time.now Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bkab...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Delorean lets you travel in time with Ruby by mocking Time.now. SPEC: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/delorean/rubygem-delorean.spec SRPM: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/delorean/rubygem-delorean-1.2.0-1.fc17.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3615002 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
