[Bug 790893] Review Request: ibus-hunspell-table - Predictive text using hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790893 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-12 03:06:19 EDT --- ibus-hunspell-table-0.0.3-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-hunspell-table-0.0.3-1.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790893] Review Request: ibus-hunspell-table - Predictive text using hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790893 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-12 03:05:50 EDT --- ibus-hunspell-table-0.0.3-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-hunspell-table-0.0.3-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790893] Review Request: ibus-hunspell-table - Predictive text using hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790893 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-12 03:06:26 EDT --- ibus-hunspell-table-0.0.3-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-hunspell-table-0.0.3-1.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790990] Review Request: annogen - Java framework for JSR-175 annotations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790990 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 03:49:45 EDT --- *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 801865] Review Request: jboss-transaction-spi - JBoss Transaction SPI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801865 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 03:53:08 EDT --- Ricardo, you bumped the release but forgot to add a changelog entry, please fix that at the time of importing the package. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740799] Review Request: jboss-jad-1.2-api - JavaEE Application Deployment 1.2 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740799 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 03:59:18 EDT --- Thanks for approving it! I'm not sure how the wrong Group made it into this spec file, heh. I contacted upstream regarding the FSF address. IIRC only LICENSE files must be put in subpackages. On the other hand content of this file is pretty much license information, so I'll include it at the time of import. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jboss-jad-1.2-api Short Description: JavaEE Application Deployment 1.2 API Owners:goldmann Branches: f17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790497] Review Request: jboss-jms-1.1-api - JBoss JMS API 1.1 Spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790497 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG) | Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 04:01:45 EDT --- Thanks for review. Upstream contacted, README will be included :) New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jboss-jms-1.1-api Short Description: JBoss JMS API 1.1 Spec Owners:goldmann Branches: f17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730306] Review Request: jboss-interceptors-1.1-api - Interceptors 1.1 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730306
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Kostadinov vladimir.kostadi...@gmail.com
2012-03-12 04:34:49 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[!] Rpmlint output:
jboss-interceptors-1.1-api.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org
HTTP Error 403: Forbidden
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
OK.
jboss-interceptors-1.1-api.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/jboss-interceptors-1.1-api-1.0.1/LICENSE
The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or
misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file,
possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF.
jboss-interceptors-1.1-api-javadoc.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US)
Javadocs - Java docs, Java-docs, Avocados
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
OK.
jboss-interceptors-1.1-api-javadoc.noarch: W: invalid-url URL:
http://www.jboss.org HTTP Error 403: Forbidden
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
OK.
jboss-interceptors-1.1-api-javadoc.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/jboss-interceptors-1.1-api-javadoc-1.0.1/LICENSE
The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or
misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file,
possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF.
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x] Buildroot definition is not present
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: CDDL or GPLv2 with exceptions
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates or must require other
packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with
good reason
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[x] Package uses %global not %define
[x] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[-] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[x] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[x] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[x] pom files has correct add_maven_depmap
=== Maven ===
[x] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[-] If package uses -Dmaven.test.skip=true explain why it was needed in a
comment
[-] If package uses custom depmap -Dmaven.local.depmap.file=* explain why
it's needed in a comment
[x] Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x] Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on
jpackage-utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
=== Other suggestions ===
[x] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[Bug 730233] Review Request: jboss-jaxrpc-1.1-api - Java API for XML-Based RPC (JAX-RPC) 1.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730233 --- Comment #16 from Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 04:35:24 EDT --- I say good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 485207] Review Request: perl-Test-Assert - Assertion methods for those who like JUnit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485207 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 04:32:49 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Test-Assert New Branches: f15 f16 f17 Owners: InitialCC: perl-sig Please add perl-sig user with watch* permissions only to all Fedora branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225759] Merge Review: fontconfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225759 --- Comment #19 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 04:44:32 EDT --- fontconfig 2.9.0 is released now. Can we have it built for Fedora 17? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 799392] Review Request: geronimo-commonj - CommonJ Specification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799392 Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 04:57:09 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: geronimo-commonj Short Description: CommonJ Specification Owners: jhernand Branches: f17 InitialCC: arg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790540] Review Request: python-liblarch_gtk - Liblarch gtk binding for use in Gtk.Treevew
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790540 Bug 790540 depends on bug 790538, which changed state. Bug 790538 Summary: Review Request: python-liblarch - Data structures helper library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790538 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com 2012-03-12 05:07:33 EDT --- Spec URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/python-liblarch/python-liblarch_gtk.spec SRPM URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/python-liblarch/python-liblarch_gtk-0.1.0-3.fc18.src.rpm - 0.1.0-3 - Fix summary typo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 796346] Review Request: jboss-annotations-1.1-api - Common Annotations 1.1 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796346 --- Comment #3 from Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 05:21:12 EDT --- The updated .spec and SRPM are available here: http://jhernand.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jboss-annotations-1.1-api/1.0.1-0.1.20120212git76e1a2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 709328] Review Request: psi-plus - Jabber client based on Qt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709328 --- Comment #66 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru 2012-03-12 05:24:34 EDT --- Hi, Rex. I've posted your message on psi-dev conference. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 797165] Review Request: jboss-el-2.2-api - Expression Language 2.2 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797165 --- Comment #4 from Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 05:31:36 EDT --- The updated spec and SRPM are available here: http://jhernand.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jboss-el-2.2-api/1.0.1-0.1.20120212git2fabd8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730232] Review Request: jboss-servlet-3.0-api - Java Servlet 3.0 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730232 --- Comment #6 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 05:49:06 EDT --- Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/jboss-servlet-3.0-api/2/jboss-servlet-3.0-api.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/jboss-servlet-3.0-api/2/jboss-servlet-3.0-api-1.0.1-0.1.20120312gitd4b6f2.fc17.src.rpm Updated files after license cleanup + spec file cleanup itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 795801] Review Request: paranamer - Library for accessing non-private methods at runtime
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795801 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: paranamer - |Review Request: paranamer - |Library for accessing |Library for accessing |private methods at runtime |non-private methods at ||runtime --- Comment #2 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 06:02:23 EDT --- Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/paranamer/2/paranamer.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/paranamer/2/paranamer-2.2-2.fc17.src.rpm Updated summary and url. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 480724] Review Request: ndjbdns - New djbdns, usable djbdns.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 --- Comment #64 from pjp pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in 2012-03-12 06:18:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #63) You are welcome. Couple of quick notes before you import: * List the binaries individually rather than use a wildcard * If you are creating log files in /var/log by default, you should run logrotate on them. See other spec files for examples. say httpd.spec * You might want to change the upstream url to ndjbdns as well to avoid any confusion with the original source. Yes, I'll do these before the upcoming release. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579299] Review Request: perl-Test-LeakTrace - Traces memory leaks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579299 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2012-03-12 06:22:20 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Test-LeakTrace New Branches: EL-5 Owners: pghmcfc InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730306] Review Request: jboss-interceptors-1.1-api - Interceptors 1.1 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730306 --- Comment #8 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 06:27:02 EDT --- Some notes: 1. Upstream was informed about the FSF address issue. 2. There is no mismatch of licenses here. It was cleared with RH Legal. Rich, could you please confirm that the license should be CDDL or GPLv2 with exceptions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730233] Review Request: jboss-jaxrpc-1.1-api - Java API for XML-Based RPC (JAX-RPC) 1.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730233 --- Comment #17 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 06:28:26 EDT --- I say thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730306] Review Request: jboss-interceptors-1.1-api - Interceptors 1.1 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730306 --- Comment #9 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 06:34:27 EDT --- Vladimir, please note also that the Legal flag was lifted after I updated the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 796346] Review Request: jboss-annotations-1.1-api - Common Annotations 1.1 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796346 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mgold...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 06:31:52 EDT --- I'll take it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 797165] Review Request: jboss-el-2.2-api - Expression Language 2.2 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797165 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mgold...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 06:32:27 EDT --- I'll take it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730306] Review Request: jboss-interceptors-1.1-api - Interceptors 1.1 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730306 --- Comment #10 from Vladimir Kostadinov vladimir.kostadi...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 07:26:44 EDT --- If this package has been cleared with CDDL or GPLv2 with exceptions, then please remove ASL 2.0 license from /src/main/resources/LICENSE.txt and put license information in some of the source file headers. Having LICENSE.txt with ASL 2.0 can mislead one to assuming that ASL 2.0 is a valid license too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 485207] Review Request: perl-Test-Assert - Assertion methods for those who like JUnit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485207 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:00:31 EDT --- Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 480724] Review Request: ndjbdns - New djbdns, usable djbdns.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 --- Comment #65 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 07:59:07 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Added f17. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 558061] Review Request: levmar - Levenberg-Marquardt nonlinear least squares optimization
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558061 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:01:15 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579299] Review Request: perl-Test-LeakTrace - Traces memory leaks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579299 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:03:07 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 644135] Review Request: miglayout - Versatile and flexible Swing and SWT layout manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644135 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:04:08 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 560380] Review Request: free42 - 42S Calculator Simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560380 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:02:35 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 591365] Review Request: libexplain - Library functions to explain system call errors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591365 --- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:03:49 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 720813] Review Request: python-strainer - Tools to allow developers to cleanup web serialization objects (HTML, JSON, XHTML)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720813 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:04:44 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 559117] Review Request: lcdtest - display test pattern generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559117 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:01:55 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590355] Review Request: golly - cellular automata simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590355 --- Comment #28 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:03:26 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740799] Review Request: jboss-jad-1.2-api - JavaEE Application Deployment 1.2 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740799 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:05:34 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 559856] Review Request: libbsd - Library providing BSD-compatible functions for portability
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856 --- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:02:16 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785727] Review Request: ocaml-camlimages - OCaml image processing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785727 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:08:42 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Created new branches, please take ownership of devel, and possibly EL-6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730306] Review Request: jboss-interceptors-1.1-api - Interceptors 1.1 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730306 --- Comment #11 from Richard Fontana rfont...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 08:10:14 EDT --- I confirm that the best license tag here is CDDL or GPLv2 with exceptions. Putting license information in the source file headers is, to my knowledge, not a Fedora packaging or legal requirement. The inclusion of the Apache License 2.0 may not be necessary and will be investigated upstream. However, it is not necessarily in conflict with the CDDL/GPLv2 license designation, and therefore should not be a packaging obstacle IMO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 794941] Review Request: neethi - Web Services Policy framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794941 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:11:33 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 781260] Review Request: leechcraft - A Free Open Source Cross-Platform Modular Internet-Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781260 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:07:03 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Added f17. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790497] Review Request: jboss-jms-1.1-api - JBoss JMS API 1.1 Spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790497 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:10:49 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 787020] Review Request: trafficserver - Apache Traffic Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787020 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:10:06 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Kalpa, please take ownership of review BZs. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802035] Review Request: librabbitmq - Client library and command line tools for AMPQ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802035 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:16:09 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 796201] Review Request: glassfish-jaxb - JAXB Reference Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796201 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:12:41 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 801614] Review Request: jboss-connector-1.6-api - Java EE Connector Architecture 1.6 API classes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801614 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:14:52 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 794946] Review Request: XmlSchema - Lightweight schema object model
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794946 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:11:54 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 799392] Review Request: geronimo-commonj - CommonJ Specification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799392 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:13:59 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 795069] Review Request: sugar-countries - Countries is a game to play with identifying countries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795069 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:12:17 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 801651] Review Request: jboss-jacc-1.4-api - JBoss Java Authorization Contract for Containers 1.4 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801651 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:15:28 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798715] Review Request: Luminance HDR - A graphical tool for creating and tone-mapping HDR images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798715 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:13:14 EDT --- Summary and SCM request package name don't match, please correct. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802377] New: Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377 Summary: Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: p...@city-fan.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://subversion.city-fan.org/repos/cfo-repo/perl-Env-Sanctify/branches/fedora/perl-Env-Sanctify.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Env-Sanctify/perl-Env-Sanctify-1.04-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: Env::Sanctify is a module that provides lexically-scoped manipulation and sanctification of %ENV. You can specify that it alter or add additional environment variables or remove existing ones according to a list of matching regexen. You can then either restore the environment back manually or let the object fall out of scope, which automagically restores. It's useful for manipulating the environment that forked processes and sub-processes will inherit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730306] Review Request: jboss-interceptors-1.1-api - Interceptors 1.1 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730306 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akurt...@redhat.com --- Comment #12 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 08:21:27 EDT --- Hmm, as Vladimir's sponsor I have to say that he is correct despite the legal team opinion. It is not obvious what the license is. And having the ASL 2.0 license shipped with the source should make the License tag at least CDDL or GPLv2 with exceptions or ASL 2.0 otherwise clear headers should be added to the source files or ASL license file removed from the source tarball so one can exclude the possibility of having ASL 2.0 content in the package. From merely looking at the source tarball I would say that it is as legal to ship it under ASL 2.0 as it is to ship it underl GPLv2 with exceptions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790990] Review Request: annogen - Java framework for JSR-175 annotations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790990 Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:22:19 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: annogen Short Description: Java framework for JSR-175 annotations Owners: arg Branches: f17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798715] Review Request: Luminance HDR - A graphical tool for creating and tone-mapping HDR images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798715 --- Comment #20 from Franco Comida francocom...@googlemail.com 2012-03-12 08:27:16 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: Luminance HDR Short Description: A graphical tool for creating and tone-mapping HDR images Owners: fcomida Branches: f17 InitialCC: rdieter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 579299] Review Request: perl-Test-LeakTrace - Traces memory leaks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579299 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-12 08:28:12 EDT --- perl-Test-LeakTrace-0.14-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-LeakTrace-0.14-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800930] Review Request: redeclipse - Multiplayer FPS game based on Cube2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800930 --- Comment #20 from Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:28:50 EDT --- Once again Martin it seems I have misled you. It looks like some repacking of the source is required (as you quite rightly suspected at the beginning). My apologies Have a look at this link, I think it explains it really well. Your debian package is doing the same thing as far as I can tell. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785727] Review Request: ocaml-camlimages - OCaml image processing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785727 --- Comment #11 from Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to 2012-03-12 08:31:50 EDT --- The package still shows as deprecated in el6 and devel, so I can't take ownership there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802384] New: Review Request: perl-Language-Prolog-Types - Prolog types in Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Language-Prolog-Types - Prolog types in Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802384 Summary: Review Request: perl-Language-Prolog-Types - Prolog types in Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Language-Prolog-Types/perl-Language-Prolog-Types.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Language-Prolog-Types/perl-Language-Prolog-Types-0.10-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: This module exports subroutines to create Prolog terms in Perl, to test term types and also some utility functions to convert data between Prolog and Perl explicitly. Notice for packager: This package will go into Fedora ≥ 16. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798654] Review Request: cmpi-bindings - CMPI-compliant provider interface for various languages via SWIG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798654 Vitezslav Crhonek vcrho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Vitezslav Crhonek vcrho...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 08:39:03 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: cmpi-bindings Short Description: CMPI-compliant provider interface for various languages via SWIG Owners: vcrhonek Branches: f16 f17 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 799392] Review Request: geronimo-commonj - CommonJ Specification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799392 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730306] Review Request: jboss-interceptors-1.1-api - Interceptors 1.1 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730306 --- Comment #13 from Richard Fontana rfont...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 08:44:16 EDT --- As lawyer for the committers of the upstream project, I confirm that under currently available information anyone is authorized to remove the Apache License text in this case. (However, I would note that one can imagine a case where preservation of the Apache License text would be necessary in otherwise very similar circumstances.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 799392] Review Request: geronimo-commonj - CommonJ Specification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799392 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-12 08:44:59 EDT --- geronimo-commonj-1.1.0-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/geronimo-commonj-1.1.0-2.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 799392] Review Request: geronimo-commonj - CommonJ Specification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799392 Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG) | Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-03-12 08:45:39 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 796201] Review Request: glassfish-jaxb - JAXB Reference Implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796201 Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG) | Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-03-12 08:51:11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 Bug 800720 depends on bug 796201, which changed state. Bug 796201 Summary: Review Request: glassfish-jaxb - JAXB Reference Implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796201 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 796204] Review Request: maven-jaxb2-plugin - Provides the capability to generate java sources from schemas
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796204 Bug 796204 depends on bug 796201, which changed state. Bug 796201 Summary: Review Request: glassfish-jaxb - JAXB Reference Implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796201 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 796204] Review Request: maven-jaxb2-plugin - Provides the capability to generate java sources from schemas
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796204 Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||agr...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|agr...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790990] Review Request: annogen - Java framework for JSR-175 annotations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790990 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:59:19 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 789602] Review Request: codemodel - Java library for code generators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789602 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-12 08:57:28 EDT --- codemodel-2.6-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/codemodel-2.6-3.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802384] Review Request: perl-Language-Prolog-Types - Prolog types in Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802384 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||802388 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802388] Review Request: perl-Language-Prolog-Sugar - Syntactic sugar for Prolog term constructors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802388 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||802384 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798654] Review Request: cmpi-bindings - CMPI-compliant provider interface for various languages via SWIG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798654 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 08:59:46 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802388] New: Review Request: perl-Language-Prolog-Sugar - Syntactic sugar for Prolog term constructors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Language-Prolog-Sugar - Syntactic sugar for Prolog term constructors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802388 Summary: Review Request: perl-Language-Prolog-Sugar - Syntactic sugar for Prolog term constructors Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Language-Prolog-Sugar/perl-Language-Prolog-Sugar.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Language-Prolog-Sugar/perl-Language-Prolog-Sugar-0.06-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: Language::Prolog::Sugar is able to export to the calling package a set of subroutines to create Prolog terms as defined in the Language::Prolog::Types module. Perl programs using these constructors have the same look as real Prolog programs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 770615] Review Request: baobab - A graphical directory tree analyzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770615 Rui Matos tiagoma...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Rui Matos tiagoma...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 09:10:51 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: baobab New Branches: f17 Owners: rtcm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 770615] Review Request: baobab - A graphical directory tree analyzer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770615 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 09:12:32 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 760154] Review Request: xcb-util-keysyms - Standard X key constants and keycodes conversion on top of libxcb
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760154
--- Comment #2 from Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com 2012-03-12
09:14:05 EDT ---
- You can remove the BuildRoot tag:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
- The BuildRequires on pkgconfig is useless, since xcb-util-devel already
requires it.
- You can also remove the Requires on pkgconfig in the devel subpackage, since
it provides a pc. file. A dependency on pkgconfig is automatically added.
- You can remove the « rm -rf %{buildroot} » instruction in %install:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
- %defattr is no longer needed in %files:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_Permissions
- About the rpath issue... I tried to build your source RPM in F16 (x86_64),
without the rpath fix stuff... The package can be built. Is the rpath fixes are
really useful?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798715] Review Request: Luminance HDR - A graphical tool for creating and tone-mapping HDR images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798715 --- Comment #21 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2012-03-12 09:20:00 EDT --- No, you want to use luminance-hdr in both places, not Luminance HDR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798715] Review Request: luminance-hdr - A graphical tool for creating and tone-mapping HDR images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798715 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: Luminance |Review Request: |HDR - A graphical tool for |luminance-hdr - A graphical |creating and tone-mapping |tool for creating and |HDR images |tone-mapping HDR images --- Comment #22 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2012-03-12 09:20:36 EDT --- I'll fix summary, just redo comment #18 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785727] Review Request: ocaml-camlimages - OCaml image processing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785727 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to 2012-03-12 09:34:21 EDT --- The package also seems to be blocked from building even on the instances that I am approved for. Builds are failing for being blocked on f15 through devel. el6 does not have one of the build dependencies (ocaml-omake), so at least for the near term the package should stay blocked in el6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798715] Review Request: luminance-hdr - A graphical tool for creating and tone-mapping HDR images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798715 --- Comment #23 from Franco Comida francocom...@googlemail.com 2012-03-12 09:38:12 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: luminance-hdr Short Description: A graphical tool for creating and tone-mapping HDR images Owners: fcomida Branches: f17 InitialCC: rdieter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 09:37:57 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[-]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[!]: MUST Buildroot is not present
Note: Invalid buildroot found:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu)
[-]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[!]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean is needed only if supporting EPEL
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[-]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5
[-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
(FSF address)
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
/home/contyk/src/review/802377/Env-Sanctify-1.04.tar.gz :
MD5SUM this package : 304b28041d75f64da4551e4db238d354
MD5SUM upstream package : 304b28041d75f64da4551e4db238d354
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
(Patched)
[-]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[?]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
upstream.
[x]: SHOULD Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
(It's obvious)
[x]: SHOULD SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[-]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[-]: SHOULD Spec use
[Bug 636905] Review Request: python-zope-structuredtext - StructuredText parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636905 --- Comment #2 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 09:43:14 EDT --- Update to 3.5.1 Spec URL: http://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/python-zope-structuredtext.spec SRPM URL: http://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/python-zope-structuredtext-3.5.1-1.fc17.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 723779] Review Request: lwjgl - LightWeight Java Game Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723779 Andrew Robinson arobi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||arobi...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|arobi...@redhat.com Bug 723779 depends on bug 790172, which changed state. Bug 790172 Summary: Review Request: jinput - Java Game Controller API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790172 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Andrew Robinson arobi...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 09:46:01 EDT --- I'll review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802384] Review Request: perl-Language-Prolog-Types - Prolog types in Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802384 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785727] Review Request: ocaml-camlimages - OCaml image processing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785727 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 09:55:11 EDT --- I unretired EL-6 and devel. You'll need to file a ticket with rel-eng to unblock the Fedora branched. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740799] Review Request: jboss-jad-1.2-api - JavaEE Application Deployment 1.2 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740799 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740799] Review Request: jboss-jad-1.2-api - JavaEE Application Deployment 1.2 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740799 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-12 09:58:58 EDT --- jboss-jad-1.2-api-1.0.1-0.1.20120309git3c3e7a.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jboss-jad-1.2-api-1.0.1-0.1.20120309git3c3e7a.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790497] Review Request: jboss-jms-1.1-api - JBoss JMS API 1.1 Spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790497 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790497] Review Request: jboss-jms-1.1-api - JBoss JMS API 1.1 Spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790497 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-12 10:07:11 EDT --- jboss-jms-1.1-api-1.0.1-0.1.20120309gitc251f89.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jboss-jms-1.1-api-1.0.1-0.1.20120309gitc251f89.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377 --- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2012-03-12 10:11:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) TODO: There are some missing build dependencies (required by bundled Module::Install), namely base, Cwd, File::Path, and File::Spec. The package builds without them at the moment, though. Added in -2. NOTE: I guess you're going to maintain EPEL branches as well so the usual BuildRoot/%defattr/%clean stuff is okay. Indeed, although since EL-4 is now EOL I'm leaving out %defattr as that's not been needed since before rpm version 4.4. TODO: Incorrent FSF address in the licence. Notify upstream, please. Done: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=75714 No blockers. Approving. Thanks Petr. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2012-03-12 10:13:10 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Env-Sanctify Short Description: Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV Owners: pghmcfc Branches: EL-5 EL-6 F-15 F-16 F-17 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802377] Review Request: perl-Env-Sanctify - Lexically scoped sanctification of %ENV
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802377 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 10:16:50 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 794946] Review Request: XmlSchema - Lightweight schema object model
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794946 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-12 10:16:47 EDT --- XmlSchema-1.4.7-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/XmlSchema-1.4.7-1.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 794946] Review Request: XmlSchema - Lightweight schema object model
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794946 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 795566] Review Request: woden - Web Service Description Language (WSDL) validating parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795566 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mgold...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-12 10:19:17 EDT --- I'll take it. I appreciate your time in looking at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730232 Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800930] Review Request: redeclipse - Multiplayer FPS game based on Cube2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800930 --- Comment #21 from Martin Erik Werner martinerikwer...@gmail.com 2012-03-12 10:23:29 EDT --- Yeah, I saw the discussion on the -devel list, and I was the one who pointed out the fonts in the new egoboo being freeware-ish over at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799778 ;) But I'm wondering to what extent does this apply? The wiki article only mentions if the content is legally non-*distributable* as far as I can tell, and I get the impression that *freeware* (or e.g. CC-BY-NC) would not fall under the prohibited code umbrella? In addition, there is this notice regarding game *data* http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Shareware In general the documentation is really flaky regarding the separation of the source rpm and the binary rpm, or if there would be any difference there at all? The license *info* seems to only apply to the binary rpms... I will be re-repacking the source, anyhow, since it's unclear, for the time being, better safe than sorry. I'm keeping the Enet lib code (not binary lib) in there though (it is clearly MIT-free), since upstream has warned that Enet shouldn't be treated as a separate lib (and asked for it to be used embedded, which I'm not doing), so I'm guessing that at some point it might be necessary to make use of it, if we're unlucky, better be prepared. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802443] New: Review Request: perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi - Yet another interface to SWI-Prolog
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi - Yet another interface to SWI-Prolog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802443 Summary: Review Request: perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi - Yet another interface to SWI-Prolog Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi/perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi/perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi-0.19-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: This package provides a bidirectional interface to SWI-Prolog. That means that Prolog code can be called from Perl that can call Perl code again and so on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
