[Bug 820488] Review Request: mod_auth_xradius - Apache module that provides authentication against RADIUS Servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820488 --- Comment #9 from Simone Caronni 2012-05-16 02:50:42 EDT --- Many thanks, I've added you in CC for the ticket on FPC: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/175 I'll try to do something with the library and see if it can be built as a shared object. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676943] Review Request: eiskaltdcpp-qt - Qt frontend to DC++ client library eiskaltdcpp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676943 vasc...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vasc...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from vasc...@gmail.com 2012-05-16 01:14:32 EDT --- Jason Tibbitts, please, look at my Review Request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821406 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 812659] Review Request: par - paragraph reformatter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812659
--- Comment #7 from David Levine 2012-05-15 22:53:10
EDT ---
Spec URL: http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~levine/par/par-1.52-5.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~levine/par/par-1.52-5.fc16.src.rpm
After seeing the discussion about id-utils on the devel mailing list, I think
that the par executable should be installed as /usr/lib/par/par. So,
par-1.52-5.spec installs these files:
/usr/lib/par/par
/usr/share/doc/par-1.52/par.doc
/usr/share/doc/par-1.52/releasenotes
/usr/share/man/man1/par.1.gz
The defattr directive can be removed if install explicitly creates the doc dir.
Output of rpmlint -o 'ValidLicenses ("Par")':
par.i386: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) reformatter -> reformatted,
reformatting, reformatory
par.i386: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fmt -> ft, mt, fit
par.i386: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bodiless -> bodices
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 --- Comment #93 from Rosen Diankov 2012-05-15 22:47:48 EDT --- hi tim, still working on sympy 0.7.x compat and should be done soon. If openrave-config is including "-L/usr/lib", it is because some library openrave links to is including /usr/lib in its linked directories. The stringis the following: -L@CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX@/lib -lopenrave@OPENRAVE_LIBRARY_SUFFIX@ @OPENRAVE_BOOST_LIB_DIRS@ @Boost_THREAD_LIBRARY_RELEASE@ If you can find out which library (boost most likely?) then you can find out why it is giving wrong info. The openrave latest_stable branch now includes fparser 4.5 since it allows us to compile with LLVM/Clang As for the Vector casts, we removed the operator (float*) cast because several compiles failed because it was clashing with operator[]. For example, which function should v[0] call? I believe it was encouraging unsafe C-type array practices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 817984] Review Request: ghc-zlib-conduit - Conduits for (de)compression
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817984 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||805887 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 817984] Review Request: ghc-zlib-conduit - Conduits for (de)compression
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817984 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2012-05-15 21:30:20 EDT --- Built for F18 rawhide. F17 and earlier need newer zlib-bindings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 817391] Review Request: jupiter - Jupiter Hardware Control System for Computers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817391 --- Comment #18 from Adrian Alves 2012-05-15 19:39:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Your Source0 is not a valid URL, see > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL > > You should drop your commented echos. Check it please, I have to add a comments there: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/jupiter.spec http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/jupiter-0.1.2-6.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 817391] Review Request: jupiter - Jupiter Hardware Control System for Computers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817391 --- Comment #19 from Adrian Alves 2012-05-15 19:41:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > This sudo hacking seems messy, consider to use pkexec from polkit. > A quick intro is found here: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsermodeMigration How u recommend to use it? make an script how? How do I use this: exec /usr/bin/pkexec command? that way? can u help me? how i need to remove the sudo hack for this pkexec? not sure how. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821296] Review Request: drpython - python IDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821296 --- Comment #6 from Adrian Alves 2012-05-15 19:21:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Some details > > [!]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define. > Note: %define nameup DrPython > > drpython.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US customizable -> > customization > > drpython.src: W: non-standard-group Development/Python > > drpython.src: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog > > drpython.src: E: non-utf8-spec-file > /tmp/rpmlint.drpython-3.11.1-2.fc16.src.rpm.Ek4ENv/drpython.spec > > drpython.src:3: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 2) Fixed Spec URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/drpython.spec SRPM URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/drpython-3.11.1-3.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 771137] Review Request: decibel-audio-player - straightforward music player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771137
--- Comment #15 from Volker Fröhlich 2012-05-15 17:37:48 EDT
---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[-]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[-]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[!]: MUST Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop using desktop-
file-install file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST The spec file handles locales properly.
[!]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
Please use the _prefix macro on your two sed invocations.
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
rpmlint decibel-audio-player-1.08-4.fc18.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint decibel-audio-player-1.08-4.fc18.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
/media/speicher1/makerpm/decibel-audio-player-1.08.tar.gz :
MD5SUM this package : e8ebaf819c198ff9951903e7c4056aef
MD5SUM upstream package : e8ebaf819c198ff9951903e7c4056aef
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[-]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[-]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[x]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
upstream.
[x]: SHOULD Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[-]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve tim
[Bug 818589] Review Request: fest-swing-junit - FEST Swing JUnit support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818589 --- Comment #5 from Roman Kennke 2012-05-15 17:01:39 EDT --- I added BuildRequires on Maven and fixed the JUnit dependency. Spec URL: http://rkennke.fedorapeople.org/fest-swing-junit/3/fest-swing-junit.spec SRPM URL: http://rkennke.fedorapeople.org/fest-swing-junit/3/fest-swing-junit-1.2.1-3.fc16.src.rpm Ok now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 718430] Review Request: unknown-horizons - a 2D RTS game written in python which uses the fife engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718430 Nelson Marques changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #25 from Nelson Marques 2012-05-15 15:34:35 EDT --- Re-opened Updated previous stuff: * http://nmarques.fedorapeople.org/packages/unknown-horizons/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737286] Review Request: salt - A parallel remote execution system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|salt-0.9.9.1-1.fc15 |salt-0.9.9.1-1.el6 --- Comment #59 from Fedora Update System 2012-05-15 15:28:46 EDT --- salt-0.9.9.1-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 744432] Review Request: pyenet - python bindings for ENet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744432 Nelson Marques changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #5 from Nelson Marques 2012-05-15 15:12:59 EDT --- Re-opening the bug report since current events. Stuff includes 'SRPM' and 'spec'. Stuff: http://nmarques.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-enet/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 771137] Review Request: decibel-audio-player - straightforward music player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771137 --- Comment #14 from Volker Fröhlich 2012-05-15 15:16:59 EDT --- On future comments, please always post the direct link to spec file and SRPM. The fedora-review utility requires that too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821890] Review Request: trac-sphinx-plugin - Basic tasks to manage Sphinx documentation in Trac
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821890 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ke...@scrye.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2012-05-15 15:09:04 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (BSD) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: (Sources do match up, md5 difference is due to timestamps) 87ae6e18ac9b477df50ea8df762c0ea1 trac-sphinx-plugin-0.2.1.20120515.hge021e691af84.tar.gz 93fb5087f811a3f4d9d02528e31069e4 trac-sphinx-plugin-0.2.1.20120515.hge021e691af84.tar.gz.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Issues: 1. rpmlint says: trac-sphinx-plugin.src: W: invalid-url Source0: trac-sphinx-plugin-0.2.1.20120515.hge021e691af84.tar.gz 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Can be ignored. I see no blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820488] Review Request: mod_auth_xradius - Apache module that provides authentication against RADIUS Servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820488 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2012-05-15 14:58:49 EDT --- Ugh. Sigh. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Exceptions File a Trac for FPC and we'll see. I'm optimistic. I'd rather see this packaged separately, so if you can coax a solib out of it that would be better. If you can get the Trac in soon we can probably look at it at tomorrow's meeting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821889] Review Request: sphinx-webtools - Sphinx web tools for python web frameworks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821889 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2012-05-15 14:49:38 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (BSD) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: (md5's don't match because of timestamp differences, contents are the same) 8241b4a44d3af52ab44c2c8f48fed441 sphinx-webtools-0.2.1.20120515.hg86a2eac02afe.tar.gz 150001f6bf73a0dca6c94092ab2be8be sphinx-webtools-0.2.1.20120515.hg86a2eac02afe.tar.gz.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Issues: 1. There's a test suite, might run it in a %check section? python setup.py test 2. rpmlint says: sphinx-webtools.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US functionalities -> functionalists, functionality, functionalist sphinx-webtools.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US functionalities -> functionalists, functionality, functionalist sphinx-webtools.src: W: invalid-url Source0: sphinx-webtools-0.2.1.20120515.hg86a2eac02afe.tar.gz 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. All can be ignored. I don't see any blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. Please do consider enabling the tests if they work ok in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 819237] Review Request: vdr-screenshot - Extended screenshot plugin for VDR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819237 --- Comment #12 from MartinKG 2012-05-15 14:48:31 EDT --- SRPM URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-screenshot/vdr-screenshot-0.0.14-3.fc17.src.rpm?a=mpJvUWzKWgc Spec URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-screenshot/vdr-screenshot.spec?a=yszn7xxxQkE rpmlint output: rpmlint vdr-screenshot-0.0.14-3.fc17.src.rpm vdr-screenshot.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) screenshots -> screen shots, screen-shots, screens hots vdr-screenshot.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mainmenu -> main menu, main-menu, trainmen vdr-screenshot.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mmdd vdr-screenshot.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hhmmss vdr-screenshot.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US jpg -> jog, jg, pg 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. rpmlint vdr-screenshot-0.0.14-3.fc17.x86_64.rpm vdr-screenshot.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) screenshots -> screen shots, screen-shots, screens hots vdr-screenshot.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mainmenu -> main menu, main-menu, trainmen vdr-screenshot.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mmdd vdr-screenshot.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hhmmss vdr-screenshot.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US jpg -> jog, jg, pg vdr-screenshot.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/cache/vdr/screenshot vdr 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820488] Review Request: mod_auth_xradius - Apache module that provides authentication against RADIUS Servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820488 --- Comment #7 from Simone Caronni 2012-05-15 14:48:49 EDT --- The libradius bundled has been updated in recent FreeBSD CVS commits at the previous links. There are no tarball releases for it, as it is part of the FreeBSD release: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/9.0-RELEASE/src.txz bundled(libradius-bsd)? Thanks, --Simone -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821838] Review Request: gitolite3 - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821838 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2012-05-15 14:46:51 EDT --- I believe so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820488] Review Request: mod_auth_xradius - Apache module that provides authentication against RADIUS Servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820488 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2012-05-15 14:40:51 EDT --- Ok, I've added that md5 implementation, so use bundled(md5-polstra). Can that libradius build a solib? Is it updated in the CVS beyond what's in this module? Are there tarball releases of it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821296] Review Request: drpython - python IDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821296 --- Comment #5 from Sergio Monteiro Basto 2012-05-15 14:38:51 EDT --- Some details [!]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define. Note: %define nameup DrPython drpython.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US customizable -> customization drpython.src: W: non-standard-group Development/Python drpython.src: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog drpython.src: E: non-utf8-spec-file /tmp/rpmlint.drpython-3.11.1-2.fc16.src.rpm.Ek4ENv/drpython.spec drpython.src:3: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 2) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821917] New: Review Request: mu - maildir utility with Emacs support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mu - maildir utility with Emacs support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821917 Summary: Review Request: mu - maildir utility with Emacs support Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: maciek.borze...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://fiona.dmcs.pl/~mborzecki/fedora/mu/mu.spec SRPM URL: http://fiona.dmcs.pl/~mborzecki/fedora/mu/mu-0.9.8.4-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: mu is a tool for dealing with e-mail messages stored in the Maildir-format, on Unix-like systems. mu's main purpose is to help you to find the messages you need, quickly; in addition, it allows you to view messages, extract attachments, create new maildirs, etc. mu has a nice Emacs interface provided in emacs-mu4e package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821838] Review Request: gitolite3 - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821838 --- Comment #7 from Simone Caronni 2012-05-15 14:27:54 EDT --- Are these the intended behaviour in the latest revision you posted? E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gitolite3/syntactic-sugar/continuation-lines E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gitolite3/syntactic-sugar/keysubdirs-as-groups E: non-executable-script /usr/share/gitolite3/VREF/MERGE-CHECK 0644L /usr/bin/perl --Simone -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821917] Review Request: mu - maildir utility with Emacs support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821917 maciek.borze...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736861] Review Request: hgview - A fast Mercurial log navigator for qt4 or curses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736861 Mads Kiilerich changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: hgview - A |Review Request: hgview - A |fast Mercurial log |fast Mercurial log |navigator written in pyqt4 |navigator for qt4 or curses -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821889] Review Request: sphinx-webtools - Sphinx web tools for python web frameworks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821889 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ke...@scrye.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2012-05-15 14:26:55 EDT --- I'll review this. Look for a full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820488] Review Request: mod_auth_xradius - Apache module that provides authentication against RADIUS Servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820488 --- Comment #5 from Simone Caronni 2012-05-15 14:19:00 EDT --- Many thanks for the patch and the the time for the review. Spec URL: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/mod_auth_xradius.spec SRPM URL: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/mod_auth_xradius-0.4.6-4.fc17.src.rpm - Changed default config to point to localhost only. - Added patch for rawhide. Regarding md5 and libradius; it seems is none of the md5 implementations listed at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#cite_note-1 this is the text file that comes inside the source: "This software was originally written by John Polstra, and donated to the FreeBSD project by Juniper Networks, Inc. Oleg Semyonov subsequently added the ability to perform RADIUS accounting. The following source files were extracted from a FreeBSD 5-STABLE system as of 20-Sep-2004: /usr/src/sys/sys/md5.h /usr/src/lib/libmd/md5c.c /usr/src/lib/libradius/libradius.3 /usr/src/lib/libradius/radius.conf.5 /usr/src/lib/libradius/radlib.c /usr/src/lib/libradius/radlib.h /usr/src/lib/libradius/radlib_private.h /usr/src/lib/libradius/radlib_vs.h" They're still in FreeBSD CVS and licensed as part of the base BSD archive that's BSD licensed: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/libradius/ What should I do? Thanks, --Simone -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 819237] Review Request: vdr-screenshot - Extended screenshot plugin for VDR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819237
--- Comment #11 from Ville Skyttä 2012-05-15 14:10:46 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #10)
> vdr-screenshot.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid
> /usr/share/locale/tr_TR/LC_MESSAGES/vdr-screenshot.mo vdr
These errors need fixing, translations should be owned by root, not vdr.
Dropping all %defattrs and using plain "%attr(-,%{vdr_user},root) %dir
%{vdr_cachedir}/screenshot/" just for the dir would be one way to fix it, or
adding one more %defattr(-,root,root,-) at the end - that's the one that ends
up affecting stuff passed to %files with -f.
Non-blocker, but I'd recommend combining the picture-path and readme patches
into one.
BTW upstream reported that the *.po patch will be included in the next release.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739015] Review Request: erlang-riak_sysmon - Rate-limiting system_monitor event handler for Riak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739015
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status Whiteboard|NotReady|
--- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2012-05-15 13:55:06 EDT
---
Lifted NotReady and updated to 1.1.2:
http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-riak_sysmon.spec
http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-riak_sysmon-1.1.2-1.fc18.src.rpm
Koji scratchbuild for F-18:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4079575
rpmlint:
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint
../RPMS/ppc/erlang-riak_sysmon-1.1.2-1.fc18.ppc.rpm
../SRPMS/erlang-riak_sysmon-1.1.2-1.fc18.src.rpm
erlang-riak_sysmon.ppc: E: explicit-lib-dependency erlang-stdlib
^^^ this one is a false positive (stdlib as a trigger)
erlang-riak_sysmon.ppc: E: no-binary
erlang-riak_sysmon.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
^^^ this one is tricky. All erlang packages must be installed into
%{_libdir}/erlang/lib so despite of the fact that some of them contains only
arch-independent data they all must be build as arch-dependent. I plan to fix
than but I wouldn't hold my breath.
erlang-riak_sysmon.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
basho-riak_sysmon-1.1.2-0-gaab7706.tar.gz
^^^ blame github for that, not me.
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings.
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820452] Review Request: mediawiki119 - updated mediawiki for EPEL-6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820452 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2012-05-15 13:31:01 EDT --- Excellent. Thanks! So, the only outstanding things I see are the rpmlint fixes, which are pretty minor and updating the License field. Please do those before checking in, but otherwise this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820452] Review Request: mediawiki119 - updated mediawiki for EPEL-6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820452 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)| --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2012-05-15 13:24:00 EDT --- Diane Peters, General Counsel for Creative Commons has agreed to except the distribution made by Fedora of the unmodified Creative Commons trademarked logo files as distributed in Mediawiki. This resolves the issue with the trademark terms to my satisfaction, so I'm lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821838] Review Request: gitolite3 - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821838 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2012-05-15 13:25:29 EDT --- - Added license file, fixed duplicate files, dropped defattr. - Dropped clean and buildroot. - Added script to generate tarball in comments. Right, I'll be building F-17, F-16, and EL-6 only. SPEC: http://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/gitolite3/gitolite3.spec SRPM: http://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/gitolite3/gitolite3-3.01-2.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820488] Review Request: mod_auth_xradius - Apache module that provides authentication against RADIUS Servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820488 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2012-05-15 13:04:30 EDT --- Builds fine on f16, but needs the following patch to build in mock for rawhide: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820488] Review Request: mod_auth_xradius - Apache module that provides authentication against RADIUS Servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820488 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2012-05-15 13:05:20 EDT --- Created attachment 584723 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=584723 unixd patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821838] Review Request: gitolite3 - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821838
--- Comment #4 from Simone Caronni 2012-05-15 13:00:15
EDT ---
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[-]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[!]: MUST Buildroot is not present
Note: Buildroot is not needed unless packager plans to package for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[!]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean is needed only if supporting EPEL
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[!]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: defattr() present in %files section. This is OK if packaging
for EPEL5. Otherwise not needed
[-]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5
[-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[!]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST No %config files under /usr.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
[!]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
Package has no sources or they are generated by developer
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[-]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[x]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
upstream.
[-]: SHOULD Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[-]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821838] Review Request: gitolite3 - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821838
--- Comment #5 from Simone Caronni 2012-05-15 13:01:08
EDT ---
EPEL 5: Looking at the spec file I assume that the package will not be built
for EPEL 5.
[!]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
The archive includes the "COPYING" file but that's not included in the %doc
section.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
gitolite3.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US userids -> use rids,
use-rids, user ids
gitolite3.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ssh's -> ash's,
sash's
gitolite3.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pubkey -> pub key,
pub-key, puberty
gitolite3.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gitosis -> mitosis,
halitosis
gitolite3.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Gitolite -> Impolite
gitolite3.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US userids -> use rids,
use-rids, user ids
gitolite3.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ssh's -> ash's, sash's
gitolite3.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pubkey -> pub key,
pub-key, puberty
gitolite3.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gitosis -> mitosis,
halitosis
gitolite3.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US perl -> Perl, peel, perk
Dictionary errors, can be ignored (halitosis?).
gitolite3.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Gitolite/Triggers/CpuTime.pm
gitolite3.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gitolite3/lib/Gitolite/Triggers/CpuTime.pm
No interpreter for perl modules, can be ignored.
gitolite3.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gitolite3/syntactic-sugar/continuation-lines
gitolite3.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/gitolite3/syntactic-sugar/keysubdirs-as-groups
Do these need an interpreter at the top?
gitolite3.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/gitolite3/.ssh/authorized_keys
gitolite3
gitolite3.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/gitolite3/.ssh/authorized_keys
gitolite3
gitolite3.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/gitolite3 gitolite3
gitolite3.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/gitolite3 gitolite3
gitolite3.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/gitolite3 0750L
gitolite3.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/gitolite3/.ssh gitolite3
gitolite3.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/gitolite3/.ssh gitolite3
gitolite3.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /var/lib/gitolite3/.ssh
I suppose these can be ignored as per the package structure and the way the
user is confined.
gitolite3.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/gitolite3/.ssh 0750L
gitolite3.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /var/lib/gitolite3/.ssh
gitolite3.noarch: E: non-readable /var/lib/gitolite3/.ssh/authorized_keys 0640L
gitolite3.noarch: E: zero-length /var/lib/gitolite3/.ssh/authorized_keys
Maybe (I'm not sure) this line can be removed from the spec file:
%attr(750,%{name},%{name}) %{gitolite_homedir}/.ssh
and a %ghost could be added to the authorized_keys file. Or another option can
be like pcpa stated in Comment #3
gitolite3.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gitolite
Can be ignored.
gitolite3.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/share/gitolite3/VREF/MERGE-CHECK 0644L /usr/bin/perl
I think this is wrong, all the other scripts in /usr/share/gitolite3/VREF/ are
executable.
gitolite3.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
sitaramc-gitolite-v3.01-0-g88b4c86-nodocs.tar.gz
Missing script to generate tarball in the SRPM.
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 9 errors, 20 warnings.
[!]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
Package has no sources or they are generated by developer
Script to generate the sources tarball from the git repository with the
declared components excluded is missing:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821838] Review Request: gitolite3 - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821838
pcpa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr
||a...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from pcpa 2012-05-15
12:56:08 EDT ---
I suggest using
%attr(750,%{name},%{name}) %dir %{gitolite_homedir}
%attr(750,%{name},%{name}) %dir %{gitolite_homedir}/.ssh
instead of
%attr(750,%{name},%{name}) %{gitolite_homedir}
%attr(750,%{name},%{name}) %{gitolite_homedir}/.ssh
to avoid files listed multiple times.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821889] New: Review Request: sphinx-webtools - Sphinx web tools for python web frameworks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sphinx-webtools - Sphinx web tools for python web frameworks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821889 Summary: Review Request: sphinx-webtools - Sphinx web tools for python web frameworks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andrea.v...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://averi.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/sphinx-webtools/sphinx-webtools.spec SRPM URL: http://averi.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/sphinx-webtools/sphinx-webtools-0.2.1-20120515.hg86a2eac02afe.fc16.src.rpm Description: This package includes some tools to manage sphinx docs on the Python web framework: generate docs, get contents and links, search functionalities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821890] New: Review Request: trac-sphinx-plugin - Basic tasks to manage Sphinx documentation in Trac
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: trac-sphinx-plugin - Basic tasks to manage Sphinx documentation in Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821890 Summary: Review Request: trac-sphinx-plugin - Basic tasks to manage Sphinx documentation in Trac Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andrea.v...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://averi.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/trac-sphinx-plugin/trac-sphinx-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://averi.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/trac-sphinx-plugin/trac-sphinx-plugin-0.2.1-20120515.hge021e691af84.fc16.src.rpm Description: A trac plugin that implements basic tasks to manage Sphinx documentation in Trac. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 814916] Review Request: sratom - a C library for serializing LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814916 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2012-05-15 12:41:56 EDT --- sratom-0.2.0-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 812699] Review Request: ghc-happstack-server - Happstack web framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812699 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2012-05-15 12:40:55 EDT --- ghc-sendfile-0.7.6-1.fc17, ghc-happstack-server-7.0.0-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 808768] Review Request: annox - Java annotations in XML resources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808768 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2012-05-15 12:41:49 EDT --- annox-0.5.0-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 814924] Review Request: jalv - a simple LV2 host
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814924 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2012-05-15 12:41:20 EDT --- jalv-1.0.0-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820488] Review Request: mod_auth_xradius - Apache module that provides authentication against RADIUS Servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820488 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla 2012-05-15 12:30:51 EDT --- Good: - rpmlint checks return: mod_auth_xradius-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) auth -> auto, Ruth, author The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. mod_auth_xradius-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) xradius -> radius, x radius, radium The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. mod_auth_xradius-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US auth -> auto, Ruth, author The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. mod_auth_xradius-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xradius -> radius, x radius, radium The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Ignore, otherwise clean. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines X license ( ASL 2.0 ) OK, text in %doc, matches source except for md5. - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file In auth_xradius.conf, should line 16 possibly be limited to just localhost by default? Maybe with what's there present, but commented out? Bundles md5, which is OK, but needs to Provide bundled(md5-$IMPLEMENTATION). Not sure what implementation we have here, might be a new one for the list. Bundles libradius. Where's it from? Is there an upstream we can package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 819237] Review Request: vdr-screenshot - Extended screenshot plugin for VDR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819237 --- Comment #10 from MartinKG 2012-05-15 12:24:58 EDT --- SRPM URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-screenshot/vdr-screenshot-0.0.14-2.fc17.src.rpm?a=ovt8WkmH_3I Spec URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-screenshot/vdr-screenshot.spec?a=A6zmPocvTXo hunspell-en is now installed rpmlint output: rpmlint vdr-screenshot-0.0.14-2.fc17.src.rpm vdr-screenshot.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) screenshots -> screen shots, screen-shots, screens hots vdr-screenshot.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mainmenu -> main menu, main-menu, trainmen vdr-screenshot.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mmdd vdr-screenshot.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hhmmss vdr-screenshot.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US jpg -> jog, jg, pg 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. rpmlint vdr-screenshot-0.0.14-2.fc17.x86_64.rpm vdr-screenshot.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) screenshots -> screen shots, screen-shots, screens hots vdr-screenshot.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mainmenu -> main menu, main-menu, trainmen vdr-screenshot.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mmdd vdr-screenshot.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hhmmss vdr-screenshot.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US jpg -> jog, jg, pg vdr-screenshot.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/locale/tr_TR/LC_MESSAGES/vdr-screenshot.mo vdr vdr-screenshot.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/locale/es_ES/LC_MESSAGES/vdr-screenshot.mo vdr vdr-screenshot.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/locale/fi_FI/LC_MESSAGES/vdr-screenshot.mo vdr vdr-screenshot.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/cache/vdr/screenshot vdr vdr-screenshot.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/locale/de_DE/LC_MESSAGES/vdr-screenshot.mo vdr vdr-screenshot.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/locale/ca_ES/LC_MESSAGES/vdr-screenshot.mo vdr vdr-screenshot.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/locale/it_IT/LC_MESSAGES/vdr-screenshot.mo vdr 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 12 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820452] Review Request: mediawiki119 - updated mediawiki for EPEL-6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820452 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2012-05-15 12:22:28 EDT --- I've confirmed with Jonathan Snook and Robert Nyman via email that we have permission to distribute their code (the part of wikibits.js which is problematic) under CC-BY-SA 2.5. I've reached out to Creative Commons to try to come up with some sort of resolution to that issue, please stay tuned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821838] Review Request: gitolite3 - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821838 Simone Caronni changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821838] Review Request: gitolite3 - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821838 --- Comment #2 from Simone Caronni 2012-05-15 12:19:47 EDT --- I will review this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821838] Review Request: gitolite3 - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821838 Simone Caronni changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821838] Review Request: gitolite3 - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821838 Simone Caronni changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|negativ...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820488] Review Request: mod_auth_xradius - Apache module that provides authentication against RADIUS Servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820488 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||limburg...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|limburg...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla 2012-05-15 12:17:30 EDT --- In progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821296] Review Request: drpython - python IDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821296 --- Comment #4 from Sergio Monteiro Basto 2012-05-15 12:11:44 EDT --- Spec URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/drpython.spec SRPM URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/drpython-3.11.1-2.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821862] New: Review Request: perl-srpm-macros - RPM macros for building Perl source package from source repository
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-srpm-macros - RPM macros for building Perl source package from source repository https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821862 Summary: Review Request: perl-srpm-macros - RPM macros for building Perl source package from source repository Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ppi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-srpm-macros/perl-srpm-macros.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-srpm-macros/perl-srpm-macros-1-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: These RPM macros are used for building Perl source packages from source repositories. They influence build-requires set into the source package. The only source files will live in Fedora source package git repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821845] Review Request: erlang-egeoip - Erlang IP Geolocation module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821845 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2012-05-15 11:00:00 EDT --- Cast wizards - raise magic FE-Legal flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821845] New: Review Request: erlang-egeoip - Erlang IP Geolocation module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: erlang-egeoip - Erlang IP Geolocation module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821845
Summary: Review Request: erlang-egeoip - Erlang IP Geolocation
module
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lemen...@gmail.com
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-egeoip.spec
SRPM URL:
http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-egeoip-0-0.2.20111025git45c32ad.fc18.src.rpm
Description: Erlang IP Geolocation module, currently supporting the MaxMind
GeoLite City Database.
Koji scratchbuild for F-18:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4078818
rpmlit report:
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint
../RPMS/ppc/erlang-egeoip-0-0.2.20111025git45c32ad.fc18.ppc.rpm
../SRPMS/erlang-egeoip-0-0.2.20111025git45c32ad.fc18.src.rpm
erlang-egeoip.ppc: E: explicit-lib-dependency erlang-stdlib
^^^ this one is a false positive (stdlib as a trigger)
erlang-egeoip.ppc: E: no-binary
erlang-egeoip.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
^^^ this one is tricky. All erlang packages must be installed into
%{_libdir}/erlang/lib so despite of the fact that some of them contains only
arch-independent data they all must be build as arch-dependent. I plan to fix
than but I wouldn't hold my breath.
erlang-egeoip.src: W: invalid-url Source0: mochi-egeoip-45c32ad.tar.gz
^^^ blame github for that, not me.
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings.
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS:
This is a popular (among fellow erlangers) Geolocation Erlang library. Note -
content license is originally named ad "Open Data License". AFAIK it looks like
BSD with advertising, but IANAL.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821838] Review Request: gitolite3 - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821838 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lkund...@v3.sk --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla 2012-05-15 10:50:44 EDT --- CCing gitolite maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821838] New: Review Request: gitolite3 - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gitolite3 - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821838 Summary: Review Request: gitolite3 - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limburg...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: Bug Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description: Gitolite allows a server to host many git repositories and provide access to many developers, without having to give them real userids on the server. The essential magic in doing this is ssh's pubkey access and the authorized keys file, and the inspiration was an older program called gitosis. Gitolite can restrict who can read from (clone/fetch) or write to (push) a repository. It can also restrict who can push to what branch or tag, which is very important in a corporate environment. Gitolite can be installed without requiring root permissions, and with no additional software than git itself and perl. It also has several other neat features described below and elsewhere in the doc/ directory. SPEC: http://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/gitolite3/gitolite3.spec SRPM: http://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/gitolite3/gitolite3-3.01-1.fc16.src.rpm Does not Obsolete gitolite because gitolite 2.x will be maintained for some time, and this facilitates careful migration to 3.x. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 808769] Review Request: jaxb2-common-basics - JAXB2 Basics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808769 --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo 2012-05-15 10:42:01 EDT --- tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4078625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739016] Review Request: erlang-poolboy - A hunky Erlang worker pool factory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739016
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status Whiteboard|NotReady|
--- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2012-05-15 10:32:16 EDT
---
Cleaned up NotReady and updated up to 0.7.0
http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-poolboy.spec
http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-poolboy-0.7.0-1.fc18.src.rpm
Koji scratchbuild for F-18:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4078604
rpmlint:
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint
../RPMS/ppc/erlang-poolboy-0.7.0-1.fc18.ppc.rpm
../SRPMS/erlang-poolboy-0.7.0-1.fc18.src.rpm
erlang-poolboy.ppc: E: no-binary
erlang-poolboy.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
^^^ this one is tricky. All erlang packages must be installed into
%{_libdir}/erlang/lib so despite of the fact that some of them contains only
arch-independent data they all must be build as arch-dependent. I plan to fix
than but I wouldn't hold my breath.
erlang-poolboy.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
devinus-poolboy-0.7.0-0-g6aab8b8.tar.gz
^^^ blame github for that, not me.
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821802] New: Review Request: erlang-erlando - A set of syntax extensions for Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: erlang-erlando - A set of syntax extensions for Erlang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821802
Summary: Review Request: erlang-erlando - A set of syntax
extensions for Erlang
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lemen...@gmail.com
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-erlando.spec
SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-erlando-2.8.2-1.fc18.src.rpm
Description: A set of syntax extensions for Erlang.
Koji scratchbuild for F-18:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4078450
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint
../RPMS/ppc/erlang-erlando-2.8.2-1.fc18.ppc.rpm
../SRPMS/erlang-erlando-2.8.2-1.fc18.src.rpm
erlang-erlando.ppc: E: explicit-lib-dependency erlang-stdlib
^^^ this one is a false positive (stdlib as a trigger)
erlang-erlando.ppc: E: no-binary
erlang-erlando.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
^^^ this one is tricky. All erlang packages must be installed into
%{_libdir}/erlang/lib so despite of the fact that some of them contains only
arch-independent data they all must be build as arch-dependent. I plan to fix
than but I wouldn't hold my breath.
erlang-erlando.src: W: strange-permission rebar 0764L
^^^ minor issue. I'll report upstream.
erlang-erlando.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
rabbitmq-erlando-rabbitmq_v2_8_2-0-g002ce5e.tar.gz
^^^ blame github for that, not me.
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings.
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS:
This app is growing popularity among Erlang developers quite fast (I'm using it
as well).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821771] Review Request: erlang-edown - EDoc extension for generating Github-flavored Markdown
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821771
--- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2012-05-15 09:59:03 EDT
---
rpmlint report:
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/erlang-edown-0.2.4-1.fc18.ppc.rpm
../SRPMS/erlang-edown-0.2.4-1.fc18.src.rpm
erlang-edown.ppc: E: explicit-lib-dependency erlang-stdlib
^^^ this one is a false positive (stdlib as a trigger)
erlang-edown.ppc: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) EDoc -> E Doc, Doc, Educ
erlang-edown.ppc: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US EDoc -> E Doc, Doc,
Educ
^^^ likewise
erlang-edown.ppc: E: no-binary
erlang-edown.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
^^^ this one is tricky. All erlang packages must be installed into
%{_libdir}/erlang/lib so despite of the fact that some of them contains only
arch-independent data they all must be build as arch-dependent. I plan to fix
than but I wouldn't hold my breath.
erlang-edown.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) EDoc -> E Doc, Doc, Educ
erlang-edown.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US EDoc -> E Doc, Doc,
Educ
^^^ false positives
erlang-edown.src: W: invalid-url Source0: esl-edown-v0.2.4-0-gdbdd41e.tar.gz
^^^ blame github for that, not me.
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 6 warnings.
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821771] New: Review Request: erlang-edown - EDoc extension for generating Github-flavored Markdown
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: erlang-edown - EDoc extension for generating Github-flavored Markdown https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821771 Summary: Review Request: erlang-edown - EDoc extension for generating Github-flavored Markdown Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemen...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-edown.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-edown-0.2.4-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: EDoc extension for generating Github-flavored Markdown. Koji scratchbuild for F-18: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4078397 THis is one of the requirements for updated erlang-gproc, which is also a requirement for numerous other recently updated Erlang packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 808768] Review Request: annox - Java annotations in XML resources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808768 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2012-05-15 09:44:58 EDT --- annox-0.5.0-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/annox-0.5.0-2.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820543] Review Request: libguac-client-vnc - VNC support for guacd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820543 Bug 820543 depends on bug 820542, which changed state. Bug 820542 Summary: Review Request: libguac - The common library used by all C components of Guacamole https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820542 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820544] Review Request: libguac-client-rdp - RDP support for guacd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820544 Bug 820544 depends on bug 820542, which changed state. Bug 820542 Summary: Review Request: libguac - The common library used by all C components of Guacamole https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820542 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820561] Review Request: guacd - Proxy daemon for Guacamole
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820561 Bug 820561 depends on bug 820542, which changed state. Bug 820542 Summary: Review Request: libguac - The common library used by all C components of Guacamole https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820542 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820542] Review Request: libguac - The common library used by all C components of Guacamole
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820542 Simone Caronni changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-05-15 09:43:24 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 808768] Review Request: annox - Java annotations in XML resources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808768 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820970] Review Request: perl-Task-Moose - Task::Moose install Moose and Moose extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820970 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-05-15 09:33:12 --- Comment #6 from Jitka Plesnikova 2012-05-15 09:33:12 EDT --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820660] Review Request: FEniCS - tracker bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820660 Jonathan Underwood changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||807731 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Underwood 2012-05-15 09:29:25 EDT --- EPEL6 also blocked by needing a later Swig package. BZ#807731 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821732] New: Review Request: scantailor - recovering retired package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: scantailor - recovering retired package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821732 Summary: Review Request: scantailor - recovering retired package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jho...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://xhorak.fedorapeople.org/scantailor.spec SRPM URL: http://xhorak.fedorapeople.org/scantailor-0.9.11-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Scan Tailor is an interactive post-processing tool for scanned pages. It performs operations such as page splitting, deskewing, adding/removing borders, and others. You give it raw scans, and you get pages ready to be printed or assembled into a PDF or DJVU file. Scanning, optical character recognition, and assembling multi-page documents are out of scope of this project. NOTE: this is actually recover of retired package. I was the maintainer before. I'm just following procedure from: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers This package works just fine on f15 (see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=302121 ) so review shouldn't be much complicated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821727] Review Request: dolfin - the C++/Python interface of FEniCS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821727 Jonathan Underwood changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||820659(python-ufc), ||693158(python-viper), ||693137(python-ffc), ||799702(python-ufl), ||483496(python-instant), ||483501(python-fiat) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820659] Review Request: python-ufc - Unified Form-assembly Code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820659 Jonathan Underwood changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||821727(dolfin) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 799702] Review Request: python-ufl - A compiler for finite element variational forms
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799702 Jonathan Underwood changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||821727(dolfin) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821727] Review Request: dolfin - the C++/Python interface of FEniCS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821727 Jonathan Underwood changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||820660(FEniCS) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820660] Review Request: FEniCS - tracker bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820660 Jonathan Underwood changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||821727(dolfin) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821727] New: Review Request: dolfin - the C++/Python interface of FEniCS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dolfin - the C++/Python interface of FEniCS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821727 Summary: Review Request: dolfin - the C++/Python interface of FEniCS Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonathan.underw...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/dolfin.spec SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/dolfin-1.0.0-0.1.el6.src.rpm Description: DOLFIN is the C++/Python interface of FEniCS, providing a consistent PSE (Problem Solving Environment) for ordinary and partial differential equations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821727] Review Request: dolfin - the C++/Python interface of FEniCS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821727 Jonathan Underwood changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||dolfin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 808768] Review Request: annox - Java annotations in XML resources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808768 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2012-05-15 09:03:33 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 808768] Review Request: annox - Java annotations in XML resources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808768 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo 2012-05-15 08:48:11 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: annox Short Description: Java annotations in XML resources Owners: gil Branches: f16 f17 InitialCC: java-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 808768] Review Request: annox - Java annotations in XML resources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808768 Mikolaj Izdebski changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Mikolaj Izdebski 2012-05-15 08:43:54 EDT --- Fixed issue: [x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. Checked now: [x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Some minor problems not blocking the package: [!]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass. Tests are skipped, but a justification is given. [!]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged. A newer upstream version is available. [!]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. The maintainer hasn't asked upstream to include the license text. Because the remaining issues are not very important, annox is: *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821511] Review Request: hornetq - High performance messaging system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821511 --- Comment #1 from Marek Goldmann 2012-05-15 08:24:20 EDT --- Reverting to version 2.2.13, as the previous one (2.2.16) is NOT compatible with AS7 (7.1.1.Final). Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4078189 Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/hornetq/2.2.13-1/hornetq.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/hornetq/2.2.13-1/hornetq-2.2.13-1.fc17.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 808768] Review Request: annox - Java annotations in XML resources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808768 --- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo 2012-05-15 08:23:04 EDT --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/annox/annox.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/annox/annox-0.5.0-2.fc16.src.rpm tested on : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4078187 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820845] Review Request: python-django-dajax - Library to create asynchronous presentation logic with Django and dajaxice
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820845 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla 2012-05-15 08:18:37 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820841] Review Request: python-django-dajaxice - Django AJAX library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820841 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla 2012-05-15 08:18:19 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820970] Review Request: perl-Task-Moose - Task::Moose install Moose and Moose extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820970 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2012-05-15 08:19:05 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 815583] Review Request: ghc-edit-distance - Levenshtein and restricted Damerau-Levenshtein edit distances
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815583 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2012-05-15 08:16:12 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820542] Review Request: libguac - The common library used by all C components of Guacamole
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820542 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla 2012-05-15 08:17:44 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 817984] Review Request: ghc-zlib-conduit - Conduits for (de)compression
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817984 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2012-05-15 08:17:11 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821712] New: Review Request: apache-commons-vfs - Commons Virtual File System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: apache-commons-vfs - Commons Virtual File System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821712 Summary: Review Request: apache-commons-vfs - Commons Virtual File System Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: punto...@libero.it QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-vfs.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-vfs-2.0-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Commons VFS provides a single API for accessing various different file systems. It presents a uniform view of the files from various different sources, such as the files on local disk, on an HTTP server, or inside a Zip archive. Some of the features of Commons VFS are: * A single consistent API for accessing files of different types. * Support for numerous file system types. * Caching of file information. Caches information in-JVM, and optionally can cache remote file information on the local file system. * Event delivery. * Support for logical file systems made up of files from various different file systems. * Utilities for integrating Commons VFS into applications, such as a VFS-aware ClassLoader and URLStreamHandlerFactory. * A set of VFS-enabled Ant tasks. Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4078170 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 --- Comment #91 from Tim Niemueller 2012-05-15 07:08:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #87) > hi tim, > > unfortunately compatibility for sympy 0.7.1 is not that easy. like promised > i'll be looking into compatibility for it shortly and within the week it > should > be in trunk. but keep in mind it will be officially released in openrave > 0.8.0. > for now, just package sympy 0.6.x, i'm sure fedora core supports offering rpms > with different versions of libraries as long as they are named differently. > it's not worth breaking openrave functionality. Nope, it ain't that easy and it would mean I need to file another review request. I have already done almost half a dozen for OpenRAVE, so I'd rather wait for sympy 0.7 compatibility. > also, just did a hot fix for openrave 0.6.4 for "openrave-core.pc.in", i > highly > suggest you repackage the srpm with r3204 of > > https://openrave.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/openrave/tags/0.6.4 I'll have a look. > as for libfparser, the priority on it is really low. by the time openrave > 0.8.0 > releases, most likely fparser will have reached a different version ;0) Well, for now I'm happy with the old fparser version. Let me know when I can upgrade. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 --- Comment #92 from Tim Niemueller 2012-05-15 07:12:14 EDT --- > can you give us the current output and expected output? by openrave tools, do > you mean the openrave-config program? The output always includes "-L/usr/lib" which is wrong on x86_64. Also, historically *-config had been used to know which flags were used to compile that particular tool and not what flags should be used to link against it. That has arguably change over the recent years, but I still prefer pkg-config whenever available. (In reply to comment #90) > you should be able to do: > > const Vector& trans; > __env->plot3(&trans[0], ...) Right, that'll be faster. I'll change it. Thanks for catching this. Is there a specific reason why there is no convenience (overridden) method to directly pass the transform? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 808768] Review Request: annox - Java annotations in XML resources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808768 --- Comment #4 from Mikolaj Izdebski 2012-05-15 07:00:54 EDT --- My question about the licensing situation on Fedora-legal-list: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2012-May/001907.html and the answer: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2012-May/001908.html I'm waiting for gil to take an appropriate action. gil: The spec file you sent to me looked fine. Post here the updated SRPM and spec please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 794783] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-modesetting - X.org modesetting fallback driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794783 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-05-15 07:02:26 --- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov 2012-05-15 07:02:26 EDT --- Ok, I'm closing this. I don't think that build failure on F-15 is relevant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821247] Review Request: fcitx-table-other - Other tables for Fcitx
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821247 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |fcitx-table-other - Oher|fcitx-table-other - Other |tables for Fcitx|tables for Fcitx -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 814924] Review Request: jalv - a simple LV2 host
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814924 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2012-05-15 05:54:22 EDT --- jalv-1.0.0-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jalv-1.0.0-2.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 814924] Review Request: jalv - a simple LV2 host
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814924 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805587] Review Request: jquery - The jQuery JavaScript Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805587 Karel Klíč changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kk...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Karel Klíč 2012-05-15 05:39:50 EDT --- How can I help to move this review forward? Here is a jQuery package built from upstream source tree: http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/jquery.spec http://kklic.fedorapeople.org/jquery-1.7.2-1.fc17.src.rpm The build does not contain a minified version. I'd wait until nodejs is packaged into Fedora and then start shipping the minified version the same way as upstream does. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
