[Bug 878421] Review Request: rubygem-bundler_ext - Load system gems via Bundler DSL
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878421 --- Comment #8 from Lukas Zapletal l...@redhat.com --- I have an issue, when I build your package under Fedora 17, the content is in a wrong directory: http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13940 [lzap@lzapx Download]$ rpm -qlp rubygem-bundler_ext-0.1.0-3.fc17.noarch.rpm /builddir/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/gems/bundler_ext-0.1.0 /builddir/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/gems/bundler_ext-0.1.0/COPYING /builddir/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/gems/bundler_ext-0.1.0/lib /builddir/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/gems/bundler_ext-0.1.0/lib/aeolus /builddir/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/gems/bundler_ext-0.1.0/lib/aeolus/ext /builddir/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/gems/bundler_ext-0.1.0/lib/aeolus/ext.rb /builddir/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/gems/bundler_ext-0.1.0/lib/aeolus/ext/bundler_ext.rb /builddir/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/gems/bundler_ext-0.1.0/lib/aeolus/ext/version.rb /builddir/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/specifications/bundler_ext-0.1.0.gemspec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880964] New: Review Request: python-django-select2 - Select2 option fields for Django
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880964 Bug ID: 880964 Summary: Review Request: python-django-select2 - Select2 option fields for Django Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Reporter: echevemas...@gmail.com Spec URL: http://echevemaster.fedorapeople.org/python-django-select2/python-django-select2.spec RPMS URL: http://echevemaster.fedorapeople.org/python-django-select2/python-django-select2-3.1.4-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Django includes basic select widget, which just generates selectoption…/option…/select tags. Although their ‘looks’ can be improved using basic CSS, but we hit a usability problem when there are too many options to select from. This is where Django-Select2 comes into picture. Fedora Account System Username: echevemaster rpmlint out: rpmlint -v python-django-select2.spec python-django-select2.spec: I: checking-url http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django-Select2/Django-Select2-3.1.4.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint -v python-django-select2-3.1.4-1.fc17.src.rpm python-django-select2.src: I: checking python-django-select2.src: I: checking-url https://github.com/applegrew/django-select2 (timeout 10 seconds) python-django-select2.src: I: checking-url http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django-Select2/Django-Select2-3.1.4.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint -v python-django-select2-3.1.4-1.fc17.noarch.rpm python-django-select2.noarch: I: checking python-django-select2.noarch: I: checking-url https://github.com/applegrew/django-select2 (timeout 10 seconds) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Tested on Koji: rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4737071 f18: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4737081 f17: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4737083 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880982] New: Review Request: xmvn - Local Extensions for Apache Maven
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880982 Bug ID: 880982 Summary: Review Request: xmvn - Local Extensions for Apache Maven Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: mizde...@redhat.com Spec URL: http://mizdebsk.fedorapeople.org/xmvn/xmvn.spec SRPM URL: http://mizdebsk.fedorapeople.org/xmvn/xmvn-0-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: This package provides extensions for Apache Maven that can be used to manage system artifact repository and use it to resolve Maven artifacts in offline mode, as well as Maven plugins to help with creating RPM packages containing Maven artifacts. Fedora Account System Username: mizdebsk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878421] Review Request: rubygem-bundler_ext - Load system gems via Bundler DSL
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878421 --- Comment #9 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #8) Sorry, you are right. The macros are not right. I made new revision fixing the issue: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-bundler_ext.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-bundler_ext-0.1.0-4.fc19.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4737159 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832666] Review Request: kfaenza-icon-theme - Faenza-Cupertino Icon Theme for KDE
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832666 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- kfaenza-icon-theme-0.8.9-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832666] Review Request: kfaenza-icon-theme - Faenza-Cupertino Icon Theme for KDE
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832666 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-11-28 06:26:28 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 870860] Review Request: opencsg - Library for Constructive Solid Geometry using OpenGL
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870860 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- opencsg-1.3.2-6.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 840109] Review Request: php-lessphp - A compiler for LESS written in PHP
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840109 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-lessphp-0.3.8-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 875506] Review Request: python-fdb - Firebird RDBMS bindings for Python
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875506 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 875506] Review Request: python-fdb - Firebird RDBMS bindings for Python
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875506 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-fdb-0.9.1-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 811661] Review Request: scirenderer - A Java rendering library based on JoGL
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811661 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- scirenderer-1.0.2-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 863571] Review Request: flare - A single player, 2D-isometric, action Role-Playing Game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571 --- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- flare-0.17.1-8.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832666] Review Request: kfaenza-icon-theme - Faenza-Cupertino Icon Theme for KDE
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832666 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- kfaenza-icon-theme-0.8.9-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880982] Review Request: xmvn - Local Extensions for Apache Maven
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880982 Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||tra...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tra...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com --- I'll do it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 872957] Review Request: php-pear-XML-SVG - API for building SVG documents
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872957 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 866463] Review Request: php-phpunit-FinderFacade - Wrapper for Symfony's Finder component
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866463 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-phpunit-FinderFacade-1.0.5-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 876645] Review Request: python-fixtures - Fixtures, reusable state for writing clean tests and more
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876645 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-fixtures-0.3.9-4.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 842199] Review Request: php-Monolog - Logging for PHP 5.3
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842199 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-Monolog-1.2.1-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860542] Review Request: kchildlock - KDE Parental Control Application
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860542 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- kchildlock-0.90.4.2-4.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860542] Review Request: kchildlock - KDE Parental Control Application
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860542 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-11-28 06:51:03 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860542] Review Request: kchildlock - KDE Parental Control Application
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860542 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- kchildlock-0.90.4.2-4.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 866428] Review Request: php-theseer-fDOMDocument - An Extension to PHP standard DOM
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866428 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-theseer-fDOMDocument-1.3.2-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-5.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854558] Review Request: erlang-riak_api - Riak Client APIs
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854558 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- erlang-eleveldb-1.2.2-1.fc17, erlang-riak_pipe-1.2.1-1.p1.fc17, erlang-merge_index-1.2.1-1.fc17, erlang-riak_api-1.2.1-1.fc17, erlang-riak_core-1.2.1-3.p1.fc17, erlang-riak_kv-1.2.1-2.p3.fc17, erlang-riak_search-1.2.1-1.p2.fc17, erlang-riak_control-1.2.1-2.fc17, riak-1.2.1-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 863571] Review Request: flare - A single player, 2D-isometric, action Role-Playing Game
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571 --- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- flare-0.17.1-8.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880982] Review Request: xmvn - Local Extensions for Apache Maven
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880982 --- Comment #2 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4737257 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 881016] New: Review Request: rubygem-audited - Log all changes to your models
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881016 Bug ID: 881016 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-audited - Log all changes to your models Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: vondr...@redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-audited.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-audited-3.0.0-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Log all changes to your models Fedora Account System Username: vondruch http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4737286 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 863569] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863569 Joseph Marrero jmarr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmarr...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Joseph Marrero jmarr...@gmail.com --- I could officially take this review, if still needed. It would be nice to have this ready before the official fedora 18 release. Let me know. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880982] Review Request: xmvn - Local Extensions for Apache Maven
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880982
Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in %package
javadoc
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Apache (v2.0). 1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/tradej/reviews/880982-xmvn/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: CheckResultdir
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 6 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java:
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
Note: Missing: 'Requires: %%{name} =' in: %package javadoc
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
Maven:
[x]: Pom files have correct add_maven_depmap call
Note: Some add_maven_depmap calls found. Please check if they are correct
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[-]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even
when building with ant
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use %{_mavenpomdir} instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer
[Bug 723575] Review Request: libpki - Easy-to-use PKI library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723575 Patrick Monnerat p...@datasphere.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2012-11-28 07:36:07 --- Comment #4 from Patrick Monnerat p...@datasphere.ch --- Too many problems (memory leaks) with this library: resigning. Will live with old version of ocspd not using it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880982] Review Request: xmvn - Local Extensions for Apache Maven
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880982 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: xmvn Short Description: Local Extensions for Apache Maven Owners: mizdebsk Branches: f17 f18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878199] Review Request: kcm-wacomtablet - KDE Control module for Wacom Graphictablets
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878199 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- i'll take a look today (sorry for the delay). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 845591] Review Request: qwt5 - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845591 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2012-11-28 07:52:00 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880982] Review Request: xmvn - Local Extensions for Apache Maven
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880982 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878188] Review Request: qtbase - Qt5 - QtBase components
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- After mulling it over a bit... while I'd hoped to be able to avoid namespacing/prefixing these, it seems the odds of hitting conflicts are high (esp given jreznik's qtwebkit example). So, i'll go ahead and rework this to use a qt5- prefix like wingw packaging is diong. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880982] Review Request: xmvn - Local Extensions for Apache Maven
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880982 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-11-28 08:08:53 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880179] Review Request: libnetfilter_cthelper - User-space infrastructure for connection tracking helpers
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880179 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880179] Review Request: libnetfilter_cthelper - User-space infrastructure for connection tracking helpers
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880179 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libnetfilter_cthelper-1.0.0-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libnetfilter_cthelper-1.0.0-3.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880179] Review Request: libnetfilter_cthelper - User-space infrastructure for connection tracking helpers
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880179 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libnetfilter_cthelper-1.0.0-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libnetfilter_cthelper-1.0.0-3.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880179] Review Request: libnetfilter_cthelper - User-space infrastructure for connection tracking helpers
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880179 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libnetfilter_cthelper-1.0.0-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libnetfilter_cthelper-1.0.0-3.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880179] Review Request: libnetfilter_cthelper - User-space infrastructure for connection tracking helpers
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880179 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libnetfilter_cthelper-1.0.0-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libnetfilter_cthelper-1.0.0-3.fc16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 872957] Review Request: php-pear-XML-SVG - API for building SVG documents
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872957 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 872957] Review Request: php-pear-XML-SVG - API for building SVG documents
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872957 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-pear-XML-SVG-1.1.0-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-XML-SVG-1.1.0-2.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 872957] Review Request: php-pear-XML-SVG - API for building SVG documents
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872957 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-pear-XML-SVG-1.1.0-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-XML-SVG-1.1.0-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 872957] Review Request: php-pear-XML-SVG - API for building SVG documents
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872957 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-pear-XML-SVG-1.1.0-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-XML-SVG-1.1.0-2.el5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 872957] Review Request: php-pear-XML-SVG - API for building SVG documents
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872957 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-pear-XML-SVG-1.1.0-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-XML-SVG-1.1.0-2.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874689] Review Request: libuv - Platform layer for node.js
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689 --- Comment #9 from Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com --- I don't have plans for F17 or EPEL 6 at this time. The reason for this is that libuv is pretty much only usable with Node.js at this time. The Node.js package undergoing review requires OpenSSL 1.0.1 or later, which is presently only available on F18+. If you have a use for libuv other than with Node.js, let me know. There's nothing preventing me building it on F17 and EPEL 6 technically, but I don't really want to support it there unless it's being used. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878199] Review Request: kcm-wacomtablet - KDE Control module for Wacom Graphictablets
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878199 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- $ rpmlint *.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. naming: ok license: ok macros: ok sources: ok f45f7be4fd1818d285dcef5d1300acba 114856-wacomtablet-1.3.7.tar.gz builds/installs: ok no issues found, APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 856560] Review Request: pg_journal - Module for sending PostgreSQL log messages directly to the systemd journal
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856560 --- Comment #3 from Tomasz Torcz zdzi...@irc.pl --- Ping? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 846481] Review Request: cantata - Client for the Music Player Daemon (MPD)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846481 --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/cantata/cantata.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/cantata/cantata-0.8.3.1-2.fc18.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Nov 28 2012 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org 0.8.3.1-2 - patch s|^#!/usr/bin/env perl|#!/usr/bin/perl| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878188] Review Request: qt5-qtbase - Qt5 - QtBase components
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: qtbase -|Review Request: qt5-qtbase |Qt5 - QtBase components |- Qt5 - QtBase components Alias||qt5-base --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qt5/qt5-qtbase.spec SRPM URL: Description: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qt5/qt5-qtbase-5.0.0-0.2.beta2.fc18.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Nov 28 2012 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org 5.0.0-0.2.beta2 - qtbase -- qt5-qtbase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878188] Review Request: qt5-qtbase - Qt5 - QtBase components
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Alias|qt5-base|qt5-qtbase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 863569] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863569 --- Comment #4 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz --- Absolutely. But I guess I will need to find a sponsor before the review? (I can't contact the sponsor for Fedora Grid Computing SIG so far.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 871216] Review Request: tupi - Tupi Open 2D Magic
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216 --- Comment #27 from Gustav Gonzalez xting...@gmail.com --- Please! I need some help with this issue... When I run the rpmlint command for the RPM file, I got many messages like this: tupi-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/tupi-0.2/src/shell/.moc But if I add this line to the SPEC file: find ./ -type d \( -name .obj -o -name .moc \) -print0 | xargs -0 /bin/rm -rf The rpmlint command prints 0 errors (which is good), but I got a lot of messages like this while the rpmbuild command is running: cpio: tupi-0.2/src/components/animation/.moc/moc_tupanimationarea.cpp: Cannot stat: No such file or directory I have been trying to put the find line in several places of the SPECfile with noluck. How do I deal with the .moc directoriescreatedby the Qt compilation process? Any hint? Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 871216] Review Request: tupi - Tupi Open 2D Magic
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216 --- Comment #28 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at --- Ignore the rpmlint warning and don't delete the files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 863569] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863569 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- I can review/sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 815018] Review Request: nodejs - javascript fast build framework
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815018 --- Comment #50 from Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com --- Originally I was considering arguing for allowing Node.js to take over the /usr/bin/node name, since it has a much higher user base than the amateur radio package. However, after looking into other distribution packages, it's become clear that they have all standardized on the 'nodejs' rename. So to remain consistent, I've patched the RPM build to generate output as 'nodejs' instead. I've also corrected the dependency requirement on http-parser, which needs to be 2.0+. Spec: http://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/packagereview/nodejs/nodejs.spec SRPM: http://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/packagereview/nodejs/nodejs-0.9.3-4.fc18.src.rpm Built in Koji for Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4737762 T.C., thank you for the information about the NPM stuff. I'm also wondering if you would be interested in being a comaintainer on the nodejs package. You seem to have a lot of knowledge on the subject. Right now my work on the npm packaging is stalled because we need to have the license evaluated. NPM uses a modified MIT license and it's not on the list of acceptable licenses for Fedora. (Nor is it on the unacceptable list) so I'm having the lawyers take a look at it. I'll let you know what they decide on. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 863569] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863569
--- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
$ rpmlint *.rpm
log4c.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US syslog - slog
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
naming: ok
license: NOT ok
1. MUST add license file
%doc COPYING
while, we're at it, may as well add
%doc AUTHORS ChangeLog README
as well
macros: ok
sources: ok
6dae664d3ce052ce8f99b249f094d152 log4c-1.2.2.tar.gz
builds/installs: ok
there's a few SHOULD items I'd like you to consider:
2. SHOULD track library soname use
%{_libdir}/liblog4c.so.3*
instead of
%{_libdir}/liblog4c.so.*
3. SHOULD drop deprecated items from .spec, if you're supporting fedora and/or
rhel =6, like
Group: tags
BuildRoot: tags
%defattr tags
%clean section
rm -rf %{buildroot} (from beginning of %install section)
4. SHOULD drop from -devel:
Requires: automake
rpm -q -f /usr/share/aclocal
filesystem-3.1-2.fc18.x86_64
is already owned by filesystem package in recent versions of fedora
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880863] Review Request: totpcgi - A centralized totp solution based on google-authenticator
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880863
--- Comment #2 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org ---
totpcgi.spec:12: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 7, tab: line 12)
Please add a BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires
[!]: Spec use %global instead of %define.
Note: %define totpcgiuser totpcgi %define totpcgiprovuser totpcgiprov
%define fixfiles_dirs %{_localstatedir}/www/totpcgi %{_localstatedir}/www
/totpcgi-provisioning %{_localstatedir}/lib/totpcgi
%{_sysconfdir}/totpcgi
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874689] Review Request: libuv - Platform layer for node.js
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874689 --- Comment #10 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com --- I'm looking at it for julia, but since julia also requires bleeding edge suitesparse which is only in rawhide, I'm fine with libuv not being elsewhere yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 881086] New: Review Request: rubygem-audited-activerecord - Log all changes to your ActiveRecord models
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881086 Bug ID: 881086 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-audited-activerecord - Log all changes to your ActiveRecord models Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: vondr...@redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-audited-activerecord.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-audited-activerecord-3.0.0-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Log all changes to your ActiveRecord models Fedora Account System Username: vondruch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 881086] Review Request: rubygem-audited-activerecord - Log all changes to your ActiveRecord models
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881086 Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||881016 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 881016] Review Request: rubygem-audited - Log all changes to your models
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881016 Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||881086 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 864187] Review Request: openscad - The Programmers Solid 3D CAD Modeller
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864187 --- Comment #16 from Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz --- Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/openscad.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/openscad-2012.10.31-2.fc17.src.rpm - Commented macros in comments - Fully versioned dependency of the main package - added desktop-file-validate -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 881096] New: Review Request: packstack - Openstack Install utility
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881096 Bug ID: 881096 Summary: Review Request: packstack - Openstack Install utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: der...@redhat.com Spec URL: http://goodsquishy.com/downloads/packstack-review-request/packstack.spec SRPM URL: http://goodsquishy.com/downloads/packstack-review-request/openstack-packstack-2012.2.1-1dev188.fc17.src.rpm Description: I have created packaging for packstack that I would like reviewed https://github.com/fedora-openstack/packstack Packstack is a utility to install a distributed openstack. It installs openstack via ssh using puppet modules. Fedora Account System Username: derekh -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 881096] Review Request: packstack - Openstack Install utility
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881096 Derek Higgins der...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pbr...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880863] Review Request: totpcgi - A centralized totp solution based on google-authenticator
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880863 Konstantin Ryabitsev i...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #3 from Konstantin Ryabitsev i...@fedoraproject.org --- See fixed versions: http://fedorapeople.org/~icon/f/totpcgi.spec http://fedorapeople.org/~icon/f/totpcgi-0.5.3-2.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880863] Review Request: totpcgi - A centralized totp solution based on google-authenticator
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880863 Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org --- This package is now APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 863569] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863569 --- Comment #7 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz --- Changes applied. AUTHORS file has a non-UTF-8 character, I suggest it could fixed directly in upstream sources (for next release). New URLs: Spec URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/log4c-1.2.2-1c/log4c.spec SRPM URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/log4c-1.2.2-1c/log4c-1.2.2-1.fc19.src.rpm koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4737887 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880863] Review Request: totpcgi - A centralized totp solution based on google-authenticator
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880863 Konstantin Ryabitsev mri...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Konstantin Ryabitsev mri...@gmail.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: totpcgi Short Description: A centralized totp solution based on google-authenticator Owners: icon Branches: f17 f18 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880863] Review Request: totpcgi - A centralized totp solution based on google-authenticator
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880863 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 880863] Review Request: totpcgi - A centralized totp solution based on google-authenticator
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880863 --- Comment #7 from Konstantin Ryabitsev i...@fedoraproject.org --- Terrific, thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832074] Review Request: python-tahrir-api - python module for commuicating with a tahrir database
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832074 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-tahrir-api-0.1.7-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-tahrir-api-0.1.7-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878199] Review Request: kcm-wacomtablet - KDE Control module for Wacom Graphictablets
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878199 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org --- naming: ok Uhm, shouldn't this be named kcm_wacomtablet instead? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878556] Review Request: rubygem-simplecov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby 1.9
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878556 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||msu...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|msu...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878199] Review Request: kcm-wacomtablet - KDE Control module for Wacom Graphictablets
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878199 --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- maybe, though we've never formally standardized kcm package names. we currently have examples of both kcm- and kcm_ in the repos. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 872957] Review Request: php-pear-XML-SVG - API for building SVG documents
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872957 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 872957] Review Request: php-pear-XML-SVG - API for building SVG documents
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872957 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-pear-XML-SVG-1.1.0-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865538] Review Request: datanommer-commands - Console commands for datanommer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865538 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- datanommer-commands-0.2.0-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865538] Review Request: datanommer-commands - Console commands for datanommer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865538 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|ERRATA |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865535] Review Request: python-datanommer-models - SQLAlchemy models for datanommer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865535 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|ERRATA |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865535] Review Request: python-datanommer-models - SQLAlchemy models for datanommer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865535 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-datanommer-models-0.2.0-6.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 871216] Review Request: tupi - Tupi Open 2D Magic
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216 --- Comment #29 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org --- Yes, those files are automatically generated during build. And the fact that they have hidden names is not an issue, that rpmlint warning is not a real issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-datanommer-consumer-0.2.0-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 865536] Review Request: python-datanommer-consumer - Hub consumer plugin for datanommer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865536 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|ERRATA |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874720] Review Request: python-anykeystore - A key-value store supporting multiple backends
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874720 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|ERRATA |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874720] Review Request: python-anykeystore - A key-value store supporting multiple backends
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874720 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-anykeystore-0.2-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 859731] Review Request: php-channel-sabredav - adds the SabreDAV channel to php-pear
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859731 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-channel-sabredav-1.3-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre-1.0.0-6.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_DAVACL-1.6.0-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_DAV-1.6.5-1.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_HTTP-1.6.4-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_VObject-1.3.5-2.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_CardDAV-1.6.5-2.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_CalDAV-1.6.4-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 862501] Review Request: php-sabredav-Sabre_DAV - Sabre_DAV is a WebDAV framework for PHP
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862501 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-channel-sabredav-1.3-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre-1.0.0-6.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_DAVACL-1.6.0-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_DAV-1.6.5-1.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_HTTP-1.6.4-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_VObject-1.3.5-2.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_CardDAV-1.6.5-2.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_CalDAV-1.6.4-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 862502] Review Request: php-sabredav-Sabre - base for Sabre_DAV packages
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862502 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-channel-sabredav-1.3-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre-1.0.0-6.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_DAVACL-1.6.0-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_DAV-1.6.5-1.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_HTTP-1.6.4-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_VObject-1.3.5-2.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_CardDAV-1.6.5-2.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_CalDAV-1.6.4-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 866118] Review Request: php-sabredav-Sabre_HTTP - allows for a central interface for Sabre DAV
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866118 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-channel-sabredav-1.3-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre-1.0.0-6.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_DAVACL-1.6.0-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_DAV-1.6.5-1.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_HTTP-1.6.4-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_VObject-1.3.5-2.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_CardDAV-1.6.5-2.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_CalDAV-1.6.4-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 869120] Review Request: php-sabredav-Sabre_DAVACL - DAVACL plugin for SabreDAV.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869120 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-channel-sabredav-1.3-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre-1.0.0-6.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_DAVACL-1.6.0-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_DAV-1.6.5-1.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_HTTP-1.6.4-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_VObject-1.3.5-2.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_CardDAV-1.6.5-2.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_CalDAV-1.6.4-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 869121] Review Request: php-sabredav-Sabre_CalDAV - CalDAV plugin for Sabre_DAV
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869121 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-channel-sabredav-1.3-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre-1.0.0-6.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_DAVACL-1.6.0-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_DAV-1.6.5-1.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_HTTP-1.6.4-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_VObject-1.3.5-2.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_CardDAV-1.6.5-2.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_CalDAV-1.6.4-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 869123] Review Request: php-sabredav-Sabre_CardDAV - CardDAV plugin for Sabre_DAV
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869123 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-channel-sabredav-1.3-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre-1.0.0-6.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_DAVACL-1.6.0-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_DAV-1.6.5-1.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_HTTP-1.6.4-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_VObject-1.3.5-2.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_CardDAV-1.6.5-2.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_CalDAV-1.6.4-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 869119] Review Request: php-sabredav-Sabre_VObject - An intuitive reader for iCalendar and vCard objects
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869119 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-channel-sabredav-1.3-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre-1.0.0-6.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_DAVACL-1.6.0-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_DAV-1.6.5-1.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_HTTP-1.6.4-3.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_VObject-1.3.5-2.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_CardDAV-1.6.5-2.el6, php-sabredav-Sabre_CalDAV-1.6.4-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834681] Review Request: python-sieve - XML Comparison Utils
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834681 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834681] Review Request: python-sieve - XML Comparison Utils
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834681 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-sieve-0.1.6-7.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878199] Review Request: kcm-wacomtablet - KDE Control module for Wacom Graphictablets
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878199
--- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
OK, I would concur with kevin here, for now let's try to use
Name: kcm_wacomtablet
(Long term, we may come up with some better standard scheme, but kcm_ is the
best we have *now*)
would you mind bumping Release, and adding,
Obsoletes: kcm-wacomtablet 1.3.7-2
Provides: kcm-wacomtablet = %{version}-%{release}
and submit an updated .spec for verification?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878556] Review Request: rubygem-simplecov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby 1.9
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878556
--- Comment #1 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com ---
Can you please explain?:
# Not doing tests, missing config file
Requires should be (to comply with ~ operator):
Requires: rubygem(multi_json) = 1.0
Requires: rubygem(multi_json) 2.0
Requires: rubygem(simplecov-html) = %{version}
Requires: rubygem(simplecov-html) 0.8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878515] Review Request: rubygem-simplecov-html - Default HTML formatter for SimpleCov
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878515 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||msu...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|msu...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
