[Bug 878501] Review Request: rubygem-ci_reporter - Generate XML for continuous integration systems
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878501 --- Comment #7 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com --- Looks good, but fails to build in mock. See: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4765761 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0P5A8IayLha=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885013] New: Review Request: python-backports-ssl_match_hostname -
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885013 Bug ID: 885013 Summary: Review Request: python-backports-ssl_match_hostname - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: i...@ianweller.org Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-backports-ssl_match_hostname/3.2-0.1.a3/python-backports-ssl_match_hostname.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-backports-ssl_match_hostname/3.2-0.1.a3/python-backports-ssl_match_hostname-3.2-0.1.a3.fc17.src.rpm Description: The Secure Sockets layer is only actually secure if you check the hostname in the certificate returned by the server to which you are connecting, and verify that it matches to hostname that you are trying to reach. But the matching logic, defined in RFC2818, can be a bit tricky to implement on your own. So the ssl package in the Standard Library of Python 3.2 now includes a match_hostname() function for performing this check instead of requiring every application to implement the check separately. This backport brings match_hostname() to users of earlier versions of Python. The actual code inside comes verbatim from Python 3.2. Fedora Account System Username: ianweller Blocking FE-Legal off the bat here (weird licensing shit), will post a link to the legal list posting when that's sent. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Iyg14RBTLXa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885013] Review Request: python-backports-ssl_match_hostname - The ssl.match_hostname() function from Python 3.2
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885013 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal) Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |python-backports-ssl_match_ |python-backports-ssl_match_ |hostname - |hostname - The ||ssl.match_hostname() ||function from Python 3.2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=q5uEtoJnNsa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885013] Review Request: python-backports-ssl_match_hostname - The ssl.match_hostname() function from Python 3.2
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885013 --- Comment #1 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org --- FE-Legal: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2012-December/002045.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vzM0Fz9CqUa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 881590] Review Request: leveldbjni - A Java Native Interface to LevelDB
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881590 Bug 881590 depends on bug 881608, which changed state. Bug 881608 Summary: Applied patch for allow leveldbjni build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881608 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CYMad2stgta=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885038] New: Review Request: pentobi - Program that plays the board game Blokus
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885038 Bug ID: 885038 Summary: Review Request: pentobi - Program that plays the board game Blokus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Reporter: jo...@fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://jouty.fedorapeople.org/pentobi.spec SRPM URL: http://jouty.fedorapeople.org/pentobi-4.3-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Pentobi is a computer program that plays the board game Blokus Fedora Account System Username:jouty -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=b4VBe7BrUna=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885039] New: Review Request: seam-parent - The parent for Seam modules
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885039 Bug ID: 885039 Summary: Review Request: seam-parent - The parent for Seam modules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: punto...@libero.it Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/seam-parent.spec SRPM URL: srpm info here Description: Parent for seamframework.org Projects. Fedora Account System Username: gil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EoCqwxnuW9a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885038] Review Request: pentobi - Program that plays the board game Blokus
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885038 Christophe Burgun jo...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pin...@pingoured.fr Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8Ys93jpJ2ja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885043] New: Review Request: seam-solder - A portable CDI extensions library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885043 Bug ID: 885043 Summary: Review Request: seam-solder - A portable CDI extensions library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: punto...@libero.it Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/seam-solder.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/seam-solder-3.1.1-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: A portable CDI extensions library for developing CDI applications, frameworks or other extensions. Fedora Account System Username: gil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0DveYXCLqha=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885039] Review Request: seam-parent - The parent for Seam modules
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885039 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||885043 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ctUvgaTi3xa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885043] Review Request: seam-solder - A portable CDI extensions library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885043 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||885039 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lv6fNJL9nIa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860249] Review Request: adobe-source-code-pro-fonts - A set of mono-spaced OpenType fonts designed for coding environments
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860249 --- Comment #28 from Tobias Florek m...@ibotty.net --- new upstream release: http://www.math.hu-berlin.de/~florek/adobe-source-code-pro-fonts.spec http://www.math.hu-berlin.de/~florek/adobe-source-code-pro-fonts-1.013-1.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=m0iTOmJeisa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 884604] Review Request: rubygem-riot - An extremely fast, expressive, and context-driven unit-testing framework
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884604 Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||bkab...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bkab...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com --- I'll take this for a review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oZMYHhdNcKa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 884677] Review Request: rubygem-rabl - General Ruby templating with JSON, BSON, XML and MessagePack support
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884677
--- Comment #1 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com ---
Incorrect license (It is MIT actually).
Can you please put at the end of %install
rm -rf ./%{gem_instdir}/.yardoc
so build pass even for those of us, who have installed yardoc?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KiGTJYVRYJa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 884604] Review Request: rubygem-riot - An extremely fast, expressive, and context-driven unit-testing framework
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884604
--- Comment #2 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com ---
- %{gem_instdir}/MIT-LICENSE should be marked as %doc
- It is customary to keep %{gem_instdir}/%{gem_name}.gemspec in the -doc
subpackage, but not mandatory, so this is not a blocker.
- You can avoid the for loops and sedding in %check by using -Ilib:test for
testrb. That way, teststrap will be on loadpath and will load ok.
- License seems to be MIT, not Ruby or GPLv2.
- File %{gem_instdir}/.yardopts is useless from Fedora POV and should be
excluded.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XY7gfmQN7ea=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 782000] Review Request: ghc-hashtables - Mutable hash tables in the ST monad
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782000 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SuKqXk8c6da=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878644] Review Request: openshift-origin-broker-util -Utility scripts for the OpenShift Origin broker
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878644 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AYBdKfgtIsa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 873256] Review Request: python-cssselect - cssselect parses CSS3 Selectors and translates them to XPath 1.0
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873256 --- Comment #2 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com --- So, any progress on this review? Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0MRWRFOhlTa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 873256] Review Request: python-cssselect - cssselect parses CSS3 Selectors and translates them to XPath 1.0
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873256 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@danny.cz --- Comment #3 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz --- seems already included - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=15004 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vx5FXkDNtRa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 875213] Review Request: python-cssselect - Parses CSS3 Selectors and translates them to XPath 1.0
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875213 Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bkab...@redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com --- Hi Kevin, I'd like to ask you to first search for already existing reviews on a package. 4 days before you, I submitted my review request for python-cssselect: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873256 This is not a rant, but some people might actually consider this rude :) Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Glu8DbnDeca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 875213] Review Request: python-cssselect - Parses CSS3 Selectors and translates them to XPath 1.0
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875213 --- Comment #10 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com --- *** Bug 873256 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7zyYArV20sa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 873256] Review Request: python-cssselect - cssselect parses CSS3 Selectors and translates them to XPath 1.0
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873256 Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2012-12-07 09:08:34 --- Comment #4 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 875213 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=O8d7kKdSKla=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860249] Review Request: adobe-source-code-pro-fonts - A set of mono-spaced OpenType fonts designed for coding environments
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860249 --- Comment #29 from Matt Rose mr...@n-able.com --- Can we get some movement from Fedora on this feature? Tobias opened it over two months ago, and he's shown great devotion to keeping the package up-to-date over the last two months. What are the next steps that have to happen before this is accepted into Fedora? Is there a current package maintainer willing to sponsor this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MuS2rit1gna=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878501] Review Request: rubygem-ci_reporter - Generate XML for continuous integration systems
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878501 --- Comment #8 from Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com --- It fails to build in rawhide, I build it in F18 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4765286 This isn't the first package I've seen that builds fine in F18, but not in rawhide. I think some of the main rubygems have changed what they provide and/or require. Looking into it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nzFhgWROtca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 875213] Review Request: python-cssselect - Parses CSS3 Selectors and translates them to XPath 1.0
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875213 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com --- Sorry. I thought I did check, I'm not sure why I didn't see the existing review. ;( You're quite welcome to co-maintain or make any improvements you like to the package. Feel free to apply in pkgdb. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Xq2kkQqxaPa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860249] Review Request: adobe-source-code-pro-fonts - A set of mono-spaced OpenType fonts designed for coding environments
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860249 --- Comment #30 from Michael J Gruber m...@fedoraproject.org --- (In reply to comment #29) Can we get some movement from Fedora on this feature? Tobias opened it over two months ago, and he's shown great devotion to keeping the package up-to-date over the last two months. What are the next steps that have to happen before this is accepted into Fedora? Is there a current package maintainer willing to sponsor this? Since Tobias is not a packager yet, he needs a sponsor in order to become a packager. Then he can file the request to create the package in the infrastructure. I'd be happy to help out, but I'm just a packager myself, not a sponsor. Please try to find a sponsor on the fedora-devel list, saying you want to become a packager, need a sponsor etc. Tobias may need to do a few informal package reviews before becoming a packager (in order to prove he's aware of the guidelines) in addition to having specced his own package. Alternatively, a packager could take over this package from Tobias right away to get it in, but that's not the idea behind the process. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8iE97jJWLxa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885013] Review Request: python-backports-ssl_match_hostname - The ssl.match_hostname() function from Python 3.2
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885013 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) | --- Comment #2 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com --- Seems like if it is copied verbatim from Python 3.2, it is under the Python license, not MIT. You should contact the upstream and try to get them to clarify why they think it is MIT. Mark it as Python and go ahead for now. If it ends up having some valid rationale for being MIT, you can change it without any Freedom concerns. Lifting FE-Legal -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SJpzr46eoea=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885120] New: Review Request: python-elfdata - Python wrapper to get ELF data
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885120 Bug ID: 885120 Summary: Review Request: python-elfdata - Python wrapper to get ELF data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: k...@redhat.com Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-elfdata.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-elfdata-0.2-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Python wrapper to get ELF data. Fedora Account System Username: kushal EPEL build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4766621 RAWHIDE: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4766639 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HGmCbw88Vya=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878644] Review Request: openshift-origin-broker-util -Utility scripts for the OpenShift Origin broker
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878644 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- openshift-origin-broker-util-1.1.8-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openshift-origin-broker-util-1.1.8-3.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=r4HJXvitBna=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878644] Review Request: openshift-origin-broker-util -Utility scripts for the OpenShift Origin broker
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878644 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hDLm7jK5K7a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 881096] Review Request: openstack-packstack - OpenStack Install utility
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881096 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- openstack-packstack-2012.2.2-0.2.dev211.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openstack-packstack-2012.2.2-0.2.dev211.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nmNXLOrmWJa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885195] New: Review Request: python-colander - A simple schema-based serialization and deserialization library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885195 Bug ID: 885195 Summary: Review Request: python-colander - A simple schema-based serialization and deserialization library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: rb...@redhat.com Spec URL: http://ralph.fedorapeople.org//python-colander.spec SRPM URL: http://ralph.fedorapeople.org//python-colander-0.9.9-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: An extensible package which can be used to: - deserialize and validate a data structure composed of strings, mappings, and lists. - serialize an arbitrary data structure to a data structure composed of strings, mappings, and lists. It runs on Python 2.6, 2.7 and 3.2. Please see http://docs.pylonsproject.org/projects/colander/en/latest/ for further documentation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=neohV3cUkGa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885195] Review Request: python-colander - A simple schema-based serialization and deserialization library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885195 --- Comment #1 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- This package built on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4767346 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QpKJMb0XDWa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- I set this request to NotReady. Well, it is actually ready, but I want to package libdbusmenu and appmenu-gtk first, to make sure to have a complete global menu bar, not only for the Plasma desktop. Perhaps I try to package Unity-2D, which could be a more convenient solution for non-KDE users. I don't use KDE, and for the time being I run plasma-desktop under Xfce, but that's not really fine. However, once appmenu-qt has been approved (bug #882508) and someone wants to maintain plasma-widget-menubar, feel free to do so. Otherwise, I will maintain it, but once we have another solution (like the mentioned Unity-2D) I will probably orphan it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZMrhjfw5hFa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882084] Review Request: python-blessings - Python library for terminal coloring, styling, and positioning
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882084
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
||m
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
||m
Alias||python-blessings
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4767484
$ rpmlint -i -v *python3-blessings.noarch: I: checking
python3-blessings.noarch: I: checking-url https://github.com/erikrose/blessings
(timeout 10 seconds)
python-blessings.src: I: checking
python-blessings.src: I: checking-url https://github.com/erikrose/blessings
(timeout 10 seconds)
python-blessings.src: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/b/blessings/blessings-1.5.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
python-blessings.noarch: I: checking
python-blessings.noarch: I: checking-url https://github.com/erikrose/blessings
(timeout 10 seconds)
python-blessings.spec: I: checking-url
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/b/blessings/blessings-1.5.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Rpmlint is happy, and I've no further objections.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
MIT
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it
is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
$ sha256sum *
3aa414066c285646622384b563ec4b93c7e50099bd65a397b8db6b6e9a90b657
blessings-1.5.tar.gz
3aa414066c285646622384b563ec4b93c7e50099bd65a397b8db6b6e9a90b657
blessings-1.5.tar.gz.orig
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[.] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific
situations)
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[Bug 885211] New: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy-traversal - A pyramid extension for traversal with SQLAlchemy objects
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885211 Bug ID: 885211 Summary: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy-traversal - A pyramid extension for traversal with SQLAlchemy objects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: rb...@redhat.com Spec URL: http://ralph.fedorapeople.org//python-sqlalchemy-traversal.spec SRPM URL: http://ralph.fedorapeople.org//python-sqlalchemy-traversal-0.4.1-1.fc18.src.rpm Description: This is a pyramid extension that allows you to use traversal with SQLAlchemy objects -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KAT3WX7FAua=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885211] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy-traversal - A pyramid extension for traversal with SQLAlchemy objects
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885211 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||885195 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=v5wa42o6qAa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885195] Review Request: python-colander - A simple schema-based serialization and deserialization library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885195 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||885211 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HQ1rcn7Rc7a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879757] Review Request: ds-backup - for school server
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879757 --- Comment #4 from zy...@myseneca.ca --- The script-without-shebang error has been fixed. SPEC URL: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~zyu26/olpc/release_0.3/ds-backup.spec SRPM URL: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~zyu26/olpc/release_0.3/ds-backup-0.11.5.g536d1d6-4.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nM3bp6rutXa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858841] Review Request: owncloud - Private file sync and share server
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841 --- Comment #35 from Matthew Miller mat...@redhat.com --- Should config.sample.php go in %doc instead of the config directory? I don't have a strong feeling here; I think we're inconsistent as a distro and I don't see a guideline offhand. Shouldn't PEAR5.php and PEAR-LICENSE be removed along with the other pear files? And, I'm sorry for not saying this sooner, but I was re-reading the bundled libraries rules and I think we need to either split out or go through the bundled-library-exception process for the remaining stuff under 3rdparty. (A lot of it may fall under copylibs https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Copylibs) (I know you're working on jquery at bug #857992). This may have the benefit of making the License field less insane. :) On a less difficult note, maybe some of the text from http://owncloud.org/about/ could go in the description? I think it'd be nice for the description of the database subpackages to make clear that it's intentional for them to be empty. Alternately, they could contain doc files for configuration with that particular database? Not a review blocker. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iEHy2iExv5a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 864187] Review Request: openscad - The Programmers Solid 3D CAD Modeller
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864187
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #26 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4767543
$ rpmlint -i -v *
openscad.src: I: checking
openscad.src: I: checking-url http://www.openscad.org/ (timeout 10 seconds)
openscad.src: W: invalid-url Source0: openscad-2012.10.31.tar.gz
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
openscad.i686: I: checking
openscad.i686: I: checking-url http://www.openscad.org/ (timeout 10 seconds)
openscad.x86_64: I: checking
openscad.x86_64: I: checking-url http://www.openscad.org/ (timeout 10 seconds)
openscad-debuginfo.i686: I: checking
openscad-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://www.openscad.org/ (timeout 10
seconds)
openscad-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking
openscad-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://www.openscad.org/ (timeout 10
seconds)
openscad.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: openscad-2012.10.31.tar.gz
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Nothing of interest.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
GPLv2 with exceptions
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it
is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
$ sha256sum *
0257c25980035444fa3912a19ebf6fbba9247b8f52a0656219910d60858953d8
openscad-2012.10.31.tar.gz
0257c25980035444fa3912a19ebf6fbba9247b8f52a0656219910d60858953d8
openscad-2012.10.31.tar.gz.orig
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[.] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific
situations)
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must
[Bug 864187] Review Request: openscad - The Programmers Solid 3D CAD Modeller
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864187 --- Comment #27 from Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: openscad Short Description: The Programmers Solid 3D CAD Modeller Owners: churchyard mariobl Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: gregjurman -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1lL6Rgnvhra=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879754] xs-activity-server review request
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879754 --- Comment #2 from zy...@myseneca.ca --- In Release 0.3, changed the source0 tag URL. SPEC URL: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~zyu26/olpc/release_0.3/xs-activity-server.spec SRPM URL: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~zyu26/olpc/release_0.3/xs-activity-server-0.3.5.g3b1d13b-4.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hJ8985Ifsoa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 860249] Review Request: adobe-source-code-pro-fonts - A set of mono-spaced OpenType fonts designed for coding environments
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860249 --- Comment #31 from Matthew Miller mat...@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #30) Please try to find a sponsor on the fedora-devel list, saying you want to become a packager, need a sponsor etc. Tobias may need to do a few informal package reviews before becoming a packager (in order to prove he's aware of the guidelines) in addition to having specced his own package. I'm going to post to the fonts sig mailing list pointing to this bug. It seems like a font packager would be the most appropriate sponsor here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oAiGICccYRa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 884876] Review Request: openscad-MCAD - OpenSCAD Parametric CAD Library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884876 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- Taking for a full review, once openscad is available in Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1Mjb2q9n9za=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 884876] Review Request: openscad-MCAD - OpenSCAD Parametric CAD Library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884876 --- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz --- Thnaks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MZTgGzWLcpa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 864187] Review Request: openscad - The Programmers Solid 3D CAD Modeller
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864187 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SScWifZHkva=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851745] Review Request: python-bitlyapi - A thin python wrapper for the bit.ly REST API
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851745 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ | Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-bitlyapi New Branches: el6 Owners: ralph InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7tvoHOilhqa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851745] Review Request: python-bitlyapi - A thin python wrapper for the bit.ly REST API
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851745 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|ERRATA |--- Keywords||Reopened -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qq4Rkdu1f5a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851746] Review Request: bitlyclip - Shorten urls in the X clipboard with bit.ly
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851746 Bug 851746 depends on bug 851745, which changed state. Bug 851745 Summary: Review Request: python-bitlyapi - A thin python wrapper for the bit.ly REST API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851745 What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|ERRATA |--- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pehMDn6GPaa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882481] Review Request: python-doit - Automation Tool
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882481 --- Comment #9 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4767718 urllib.error.URLError: urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known The same problem. Koji is unable to load external things - in general, or at least in this case. But once the package is approved, you have Koji only and you cannot upload packages which have been built in Mock... We need a proper solution in any case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PlZJkan41oa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878644] Review Request: openshift-origin-broker-util -Utility scripts for the OpenShift Origin broker
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878644 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9UfyVp7pLxa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878644] Review Request: openshift-origin-broker-util -Utility scripts for the OpenShift Origin broker
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878644 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- openshift-origin-broker-util-1.1.8-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=esKt370y5Oa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878247] Review Request: perl-Lingua-EN-Numbers-Easy - Hash access to Lingua::EN::Numbers objects
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878247 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gRwBph3DlGa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878247] Review Request: perl-Lingua-EN-Numbers-Easy - Hash access to Lingua::EN::Numbers objects
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878247 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Lingua-EN-Numbers-Easy-2009110701-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KuN99rSdfPa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882701] Review Request: zathura-ps - PS support for zathura via libspectre
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882701 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- zathura-pdf-poppler-0.2.1-4.fc18, zathura-ps-0.2.0-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nDLj5JKhVIa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882701] Review Request: zathura-ps - PS support for zathura via libspectre
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882701 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PEwFpfzrPna=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 881431] Review Request: zathura-pdf-poppler - PDF support for zathura via poppler
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881431 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- zathura-pdf-poppler-0.2.1-4.fc18, zathura-ps-0.2.0-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=otR9Y7Q9gNa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 881431] Review Request: zathura-pdf-poppler - PDF support for zathura via poppler
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881431 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gIWKJwYlNfa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885195] Review Request: python-colander - A simple schema-based serialization and deserialization library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885195 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m Alias||python-colander Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- $ rpmlint -i -v * python-colander.src: I: checking python-colander.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) deserialization - serialization, materialization, denationalization The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. python-colander.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US deserialize - serialize, desalinize The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. python-colander.src: I: checking-url http://pypi.python.org/pypi/colander (timeout 10 seconds) python-colander.src: I: checking-url http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/c/colander/colander-0.9.9.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) python-colander.noarch: I: checking python-colander.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) deserialization - serialization, materialization, denationalization The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. python-colander.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US deserialize - serialize, desalinize The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. python-colander.noarch: I: checking-url http://pypi.python.org/pypi/colander (timeout 10 seconds) python-colander.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/python-colander-0.9.9/docs/.static The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. python-colander.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/python-colander-0.9.9/docs/.static The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. python-colander.spec: I: checking-url http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/c/colander/colander-0.9.9.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. Just one issue of interest: There's a hidden folder in the docs. This doesn't make sense anyway, unless it is needed at runtime, but in this case it is not allowed, because files in the docs must not affect the package itself. The folder contains a gif picture and a css stylesheet. As far as I can see, these files are needed to produce HTML formatted output from the *.rst files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8XCBqytpWCa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851745] Review Request: python-bitlyapi - A thin python wrapper for the bit.ly REST API
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851745 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tQBgp2mD6Ja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833226] Review Request: python-pycparser - C parser and AST generator written in Python
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833226 --- Comment #8 from Jos de Kloe josdek...@gmail.com --- Hi Scott Tsai, could you please fix the last tiny issue in the spec file (adding the LICENSE file to the %doc section, see Comment 3). The other issues I mentioned are optional, and it's up to you to decide what to do with them. After that, I have no more comments and will approve this package. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4ZDrZOkzZca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 807383] Review Request: PythonMagick - Interface to ImageMagick for Python written in C++
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807383 --- Comment #8 from Jos de Kloe josdek...@gmail.com --- As mentioned earlier, my review is an informal one, meaning that I do not have the rights to sponsor you. You still need to find a sponsor to allow the package to be accepted into Fedora. The best way is to introduce yourself on the devel mailinglist (assuming you did not yet do this). The procedure for this is detailed here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=buapevH7iza=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 815018] Review Request: nodejs - javascript fast build framework
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815018 --- Comment #57 from Kevin Fox kevin@pnnl.gov --- For reference, here's how Debian solved it: lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/07/msg2.html Both sides have good reasons for not wanting to rename now. Debian concluded neither side will agree and put steps into place to resolve it fairly by renaming both. I'd suggest doing something very similar. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lR2mwbz4RKa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885120] Review Request: python-elfdata - Python wrapper to get ELF data
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885120
Jos de Kloe josdek...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||josdek...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Jos de Kloe josdek...@gmail.com ---
the package builds fine using mock with target rawhide as well on my side, and
produces 3 rpms. The rpmlint results on these are:
rpmlint python-elfdata-0.2-1.fc19.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint python-elfdata-0.2-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm
python-elfdata.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.7/si\
te-packages/elfdata.so 0775L
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint python-elfdata-debuginfo-0.2-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
the software seems to work correct:
at the python prompt:
import elfdata
elfdata.get_buildid('/usr/bin/python')
['581d0eca14f240d039dea75937520809a6f02cfc']
gives the same buildid result as issuing
eu-readelf -n /usr/bin/python
on the commandline.
eu-readelf -n /usr/bin/python | tail -1
Build ID: 581d0eca14f240d039dea75937520809a6f02cfc
My main complaint for this module is the lack of documentation.
(usage of the module may be obvious for those deeply involved into elf, but it
wasn't for me). This is not directly related to the packaging, but since you
are the author as well I have to mention it.
The only 3 lines of documentation in the doc string of the module
after issuing help(elfdata) on the python prompt are:
FUNCTIONS
get_buildid(...)
Does some magic
adding some more documentation would make this module
much more usefull to actual users I think.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Y3ZcHi24dsa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882481] Review Request: python-doit - Automation Tool
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882481 --- Comment #10 from José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt --- Koji does not allow to load external material, for obvious security reasons. :-) Imagine that it allowed and later that site went rogue... an invitation to disaster. :-) Thanks for looking into this, I will find out why it fails. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7Z6NdIbXQZa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 876043] Review Request: xfce-theme-manager - A theme manager for Xfce
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876043 --- Comment #13 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com --- Hi Kevin since you have granted review, and has put his state in +, when I can give approval to this package? Thanks in advance and very grateful for the reviews- Kind Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dW8bWaCDSAa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 876043] Review Request: xfce-theme-manager - A theme manager for Xfce
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876043 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com --- Follow the process from: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Add_Package_to_Source_Code_Management_.28SCM.29_system_and_Set_Owner basically you add a scm request here and set the 'fedora-cvs' flag to ? and then scmadmins process it and you can import, build and push updates of the package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WRyOppqlMfa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 871216] Review Request: tupi - 2D vector-based animation environment
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
Gustav Gonzalez xting...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|rawhide |17
--- Comment #32 from Gustav Gonzalez xting...@gmail.com ---
I simplified the files list. The only lines I left were these:
%{_libdir}/%{name}
%{_bindir}/%{name}
%{_bindir}/%{name}.bin
%{_datadir}/applications/tupi.desktop
%{_datadir}/man/man1/*.1*
%{_datadir}/mime/packages/tupi.xml
%{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}.png
%{_datadir}/%{name}
But now I got these warnings when I build the RPM file:
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/tupi/data/translations/tupi_ca.qm
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/tupi/data/translations/tupi_cs.qm
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/tupi/data/translations/tupi_da.qm
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/tupi/data/translations/tupi_de.qm
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/tupi/data/translations/tupi_es.qm
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/tupi/data/translations/tupi_gl.qm
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/tupi/data/translations/tupi_it.qm
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/tupi/data/translations/tupi_pt.qm
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/tupi/data/translations/tupi_ru.qm
Is this a critical error? I was checking and there's no double copy or anything
weird about those files. How do I fix this?
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3EtZaohIRXa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 876043] Review Request: xfce-theme-manager - A theme manager for Xfce
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876043 Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #14) Follow the process from: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Add_Package_to_Source_Code_Management _.28SCM.29_system_and_Set_Owner basically you add a scm request here and set the 'fedora-cvs' flag to ? and then scmadmins process it and you can import, build and push updates of the package. If I know, I think there is a misunderstanding here from me (by the language), as I not saw the word approved. I thought you had something more to review, :) thanks again New Package SCM Request === Package Name: xfce-theme-manager Short Description: A theme manager for Xfce Owners: echevemaster Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dRuId4WY3Ja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 871216] Review Request: tupi - 2D vector-based animation environment
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #33 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com ---
Use:
%exclude %{_datadir}/%{name}/data/translations
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ib1EXEoWxCa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 876043] Review Request: xfce-theme-manager - A theme manager for Xfce
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876043 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com --- Sorry if you were waiting for me. ;( Should be all set from my side. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bcRVbN3TMea=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 884759] Review Request: toilet - colorful ASCII art generator
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884759 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@zarb.org --- Comment #1 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org --- Hi, you didn't gave your username, and the email you us do not correspond to the one of jnovy in FAS, can you give the info ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bHoTtOvCvIa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 871216] Review Request: tupi - 2D vector-based animation environment
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #34 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org ---
But now I got these warnings when I build the RPM file:
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/tupi/data/translations/tupi_ca.qm
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/tupi/data/translations/tupi_cs.qm
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/tupi/data/translations/tupi_da.qm
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/tupi/data/translations/tupi_de.qm
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/tupi/data/translations/tupi_es.qm
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/tupi/data/translations/tupi_gl.qm
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/tupi/data/translations/tupi_it.qm
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/tupi/data/translations/tupi_pt.qm
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/tupi/data/translations/tupi_ru.qm
That's because those files are already listed in tupi.lang (found by
%find_lang) (and that's how it should be).
Use:
%exclude %{_datadir}/%{name}/data/translations
No, that won't work as expected, because we actually want those files packaged.
You cannot use %exclude in this case.
You will have to use a more detailed file list.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hcTxQ7dTm7a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885195] Review Request: python-colander - A simple schema-based serialization and deserialization library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885195 --- Comment #3 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- Hm. I believe I can just remove that folder without issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RQllcY2w7za=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885195] Review Request: python-colander - A simple schema-based serialization and deserialization library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885195 --- Comment #4 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- New release with that folder removed. SPEC: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-colander.spec SRPM: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-colander-0.9.9-2.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hFl6ZO9Biba=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851745] Review Request: python-bitlyapi - A thin python wrapper for the bit.ly REST API
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851745 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=C8xBBa55qLa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851745] Review Request: python-bitlyapi - A thin python wrapper for the bit.ly REST API
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851745 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-bitlyapi-0.1.1-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-bitlyapi-0.1.1-2.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bmN42dbYVfa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 879881] Review Request: gst-openmax - OpenMAX plugin for gstreamer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879881 --- Comment #8 from amartinenco...@gmail.com --- You just looked over the old package, the updated one is in the attachment section. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TOhTrrZxjwa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878500] Review Request: rubygem-appraisal - Find out what your Ruby gems are worth
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878500 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-12-07 23:24:19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WpKyjxnphka=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878500] Review Request: rubygem-appraisal - Find out what your Ruby gems are worth
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878500 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-appraisal-0.5.1-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=v11y5e6ne1a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878236] Review Request: python-waitress - Waitress WSGI server
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878236 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-12-07 23:25:46 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1rRbr5gqUNa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878236] Review Request: python-waitress - Waitress WSGI server
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878236 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-waitress-0.8.2-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jCSsrBVXOga=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 825494] Review Request: cliquer - Find cliques in arbitrary weighted graphs
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825494 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pwJKjkP4rDa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 825494] Review Request: cliquer - Find cliques in arbitrary weighted graphs
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825494 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- cliquer-1.21-4.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AfNaXEayVca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854764] Review Request:openshift-origin-port-proxy - Script to configure HAProxy to do port forwarding for OpenShift Origin
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854764 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-12-07 23:26:59 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FNLTEUyKwMa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854764] Review Request:openshift-origin-port-proxy - Script to configure HAProxy to do port forwarding for OpenShift Origin
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854764 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- openshift-origin-port-proxy-1.1.1-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pjKltefJqma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878199] Review Request: kcm_wacomtablet - KDE Control module for Wacom Graphictablets
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878199 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BBh2t41kIOa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878199] Review Request: kcm_wacomtablet - KDE Control module for Wacom Graphictablets
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878199 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- kcm_wacomtablet-1.3.7-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NxMc8BoZ0Da=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878556] Review Request: rubygem-simplecov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby 1.9
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878556 Bug 878556 depends on bug 878515, which changed state. Bug 878515 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-simplecov-html - Default HTML formatter for SimpleCov https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878515 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UBOnD98d4Oa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878515] Review Request: rubygem-simplecov-html - Default HTML formatter for SimpleCov
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878515 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-12-07 23:29:25 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MUhHQFnuCua=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878515] Review Request: rubygem-simplecov-html - Default HTML formatter for SimpleCov
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878515 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-simplecov-html-0.7.1-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EId6ZZOMnxa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 851689] Review Request: mingw-libgsf - Library for reading and writing structured files
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851689 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mingw-libgsf-1.14.25-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=V1FUQJmVHYa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874249] Review Request: rubygem-inifile - INI file reader and writer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874249 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Taking I would appreciate it if you would review my review request bug 872909 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Pp8fsWG2Z4a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874249] Review Request: rubygem-inifile - INI file reader and writer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874249 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bANSFm9HZWa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 836368] Review Request: rubygem-bicho - Library to access Bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836368 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Taking. I would appreciate it if you would review my review request bug 872910. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jJnneipaVwa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874105] Review Request: qpid-proton - Proton is a high performance, lightweight messaging library
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874105 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #3 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Taking. I would appreciate it if you would review my review requst bug 770534. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vbqflWtKP3a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
