[Bug 963074] Review Request: librime - Rime Input Method Engine Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963074 Peng Wu p...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Peng Wu p...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: librime Short Description: Rime Input Method Engine Library Owners: pwu Branches: f18 f19 InitialCC: i18n-team petersen -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vphOIZNkgPa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 916432] Review Request: python-geojson - Encoder/decoder for simple GIS features
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916432 --- Comment #13 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at --- Please push the updates to stable! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7n3oODRTBHa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 834747] Review Request: gps - IDE for C and Ada
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834747 --- Comment #15 from Pavel Zhukov pzhu...@redhat.com --- You can use this one: http://vgai.de/fedora/2012-06-23/gps-5.0.1-1.fc17.src.rpm But I'm going to write new gpr files (please see AWS rpm for example) because original gprs contain a lot of crosslinks to bundled libraries, hard-coded compilation flags etc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7I4CQM22W4a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924377] Review Request: mate-user-share - Mate user file sharing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924377 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hdego...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|hdego...@redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com --- I'll review this one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CVsZM1vTf8a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962813] Review Request: funguloids - Space-Flying-Mushroom-Picking-Simulator game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962813 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com --- Hi, Thank for the review! (In reply to Wolfgang Ulbrich from comment #4) offtopic on (In reply to comment #2) Hi, (In reply to comment #1) Hi Hans, you didn't assign a review from me Yes, I didn't get around to doing one yet, will do so ASAP. any particular review you would prefer me to take? I prefer caja-dropbox at rpmfusion, but i don't wanna post the link here. But at the moment i'm a little bit confused about the licensing situation. And i don't know if it is possible to provide the package at there. There are some comments about this. If you think it is possible pls catch this review. I don't mind doing rpmfusion reviews, but I would rather wait for the licensing situation to sort itself out. Once that is sorted out drop me a mail, and I'm sure we can do another review swap. Otherwise catch one of them. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924377 I've taken this one. Regards, Hans -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=D3tgoc32Xia=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962813] Review Request: funguloids - Space-Flying-Mushroom-Picking-Simulator game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962813 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: funguloids Short Description: Space-Flying-Mushroom-Picking-Simulator game Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: f18 f19 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=17N6ETJukka=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924377] Review Request: mate-user-share - Mate user file sharing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924377 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com --- Full review done, results: Good: - rpmlint checks return: mate-user-share.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/mate-user-share.desktop 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. This warning can be ignored - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPLv2+) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - .desktop file properly validated Needs work: - You're using an upstream tarbal, so there should be no need to run autogen.sh, if there is a specific reason for this, please add a comment to the specfile why you're running autogen.sh. Note that %configure has been modified in newer redhat-rpm-config versions to take care of aarch64 issues, so if that is the reason you can drop the autogen.sh call. - desktop-file-validate is usually called from %install, %check is intended for packages with come with test-suites to run the test-suite. ie make test / make check -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bSEhTa3xiHa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 955804] Review Request: nzbget - Command-line based binary newsgrabber for nzb files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955804 Marcel Wysocki m...@satgnu.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marcel Wysocki m...@satgnu.net --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: nzbget Short Description: Command-line based binary newsgrabber for nzb files Owners: maci Branches: f17 f18 f19 el6 InitialCC: This package was deprecated before. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=l40sueTDsPa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 952355] Review Request: hovercraft - Makes impress.js presentations from reStructuredText
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952355 --- Comment #3 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. NO, See below - License CC0/BSD NO - License field in spec matches NO, See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream sha256sum: This package: c21eb09e6e0e5b8fd34275fda08fdd30e52dcf09b22b2ab3293a16287fd212c6 Upstream package: c21eb09e6e0e5b8fd34275fda08fdd30e52dcf09b22b2ab3293a16287fd212c6 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) OK, See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Rpmlint output: Checking: hovercraft-1.1-1.fc20.noarch.rpm hovercraft.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) reStructuredText - restructured Text, restructured-text, restructure hovercraft.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reStructuredText - restructured Text, restructured-text, restructure hovercraft.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repositioning - re positioning, re-positioning, positioning hovercraft.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/hovercraft/templates/simple/js/impress.js /usr/share/impressjs/impress.js hovercraft.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/hovercraft/templates/default/js/impress.js /usr/share/impressjs/impress.js hovercraft.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary hovercraft 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. The dangling symlinks are bogus: after installation they work. Spelling errors can be neglected in this case. Issues: 1. This package contains reST.xsl, which is licensed BSD. Maybe add this as well to the spec file? 2. The package does not contain a COPYING file. Please ask upstream to include it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3dzDQl5tA4a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 952355] Review Request: hovercraft - Makes impress.js presentations from reStructuredText
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952355 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. NO, See below - License CC0/BSD NO - License field in spec matches NO, See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream sha256sum: This package: c21eb09e6e0e5b8fd34275fda08fdd30e52dcf09b22b2ab3293a16287fd212c6 Upstream package: c21eb09e6e0e5b8fd34275fda08fdd30e52dcf09b22b2ab3293a16287fd212c6 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) OK, See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Rpmlint output: Checking: hovercraft-1.1-1.fc20.noarch.rpm hovercraft.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) reStructuredText - restructured Text, restructured-text, restructure hovercraft.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reStructuredText - restructured Text, restructured-text, restructure hovercraft.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repositioning - re positioning, re-positioning, positioning hovercraft.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/hovercraft/templates/simple/js/impress.js /usr/share/impressjs/impress.js hovercraft.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/hovercraft/templates/default/js/impress.js /usr/share/impressjs/impress.js hovercraft.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary hovercraft 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. The dangling symlinks are bogus: after installation they work. Spelling errors can be neglected in this case. Issues: 1. This package contains reST.xsl, which is licensed BSD. Maybe add this as well to the spec file? 2. The package does not contain a COPYING file. Please ask upstream to include it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lidCkowMIXa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894834] Review Request: mingw-gtkglext - OpenGL Extension to GTK+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894834 --- Comment #20 from Marcel Wysocki m...@satgnu.net --- * Mon May 20 2013 Marcel Wysocki m...@satgnu.net - 1.2.0-9 - remove autoconf files - spec cleanups - added infos about patches SPEC URL: http://maci.satgnu.net/rpmbuild/SPECS/mingw-gtkglext.spec SRPM URL: http://maci.satgnu.net/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mingw-gtkglext-1.2.0-9.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FZOUwWoINta=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924377] Review Request: mate-user-share - Mate user file sharing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924377 --- Comment #10 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de --- (In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #9) Full review done, results: snip Needs work: - You're using an upstream tarbal, so there should be no need to run autogen.sh, if there is a specific reason for this, please add a comment to the specfile why you're running autogen.sh. Note that %configure has been modified in newer redhat-rpm-config versions to take care of aarch64 issues, so if that is the reason you can drop the autogen.sh call. - desktop-file-validate is usually called from %install, %check is intended for packages with come with test-suites to run the test-suite. ie make test / make check Thanks for your hints. I will removed %check and use %install for desktop-file-validate. All current MATE tarballs comes without configure and make files, they have only configure.ac/in and Makefile.am include. For this reason i use NOCONFIGURE=1 ./autogen.sh to create them. New mock build: * Mon May 20 2013 Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de - 1.6.0-3 - remove %%check - add a comment for usage of autogen.sh Spec URL: http://raveit65.fedorapeople.org/Mate/SPECS/mate-user-share.spec SRPM URL: http://raveit65.fedorapeople.org/Mate/SRPM/mate-user-share-1.6.0-3.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=k5Q20DBUyba=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963693] Review Request: jenkins-commons-jelly - Open and customizable XML processing engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963693
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [-] = Not applicable
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Java:
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
Maven:
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even
when building with ant
[x]: Pom files have correct Maven mapping
[x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use %{_mavenpomdir} instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane.
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec
[Bug 958358] Review Request: darkhttpd - A secure, lightweight, fast, single-threaded HTTP/1.1 server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958358 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: darkhttpd Short Description: A secure, lightweight, fast, single-threaded HTTP/1.1 server Owners: cicku Branches: f18 f19 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YHxphMfVv0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 959974] Review Request: lfcbase - Lemke Foundation Classes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959974 --- Comment #21 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Björn Esser from comment #19) All should be fixed. Please try: Spec URL: http://cicku.me/liblfc.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/liblfc-1.5.4-2.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IEYMQX8v57a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 965007] New: Review Request: gedit-trailsave - Gedit plugin who strip trailing whitespace on save
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965007 Bug ID: 965007 Summary: Review Request: gedit-trailsave - Gedit plugin who strip trailing whitespace on save Product: Fedora Version: 19 Component: Package Review Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: llaum...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Gedit plugin who strip trailing whitespace on save --- SPEC: https://projects.llaumgui.com/p/rpmbuild/source/tree/master/SPECS/gedit-trailsave.spec SRPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/gedit-trailsave/gedit-trailsave-3.1.2-1.fc18.src.rpm rpmlint: gedit-trailsave.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) whitespace - white space, white-space, whites pace gedit-trailsave.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US whitespace - white space, white-space, whites pace gedit-trailsave.x86_64: E: no-binary gedit-trailsave.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib gedit-trailsave.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/gedit/plugins/trailsave.py gedit-trailsave.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/gedit/plugins/trailsave.plugin gedit-trailsave-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package gedit-trailsave.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) whitespace - white space, white-space, whites pace gedit-trailsave.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US whitespace - white space, white-space, whites pace gedit-trailsave.src: W: invalid-url Source0: https://github.com/jonleighton/gedit-trailsave/archive/a9b65a6358c07e41ea835bcd22cf1c99a8df470a/gedit-trailsave-3.1.2-a9b65a6.tar.gz The read operation timed out 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 6 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7Mu2brufJ0a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 959974] Review Request: lfcbase - Lemke Foundation Classes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959974 --- Comment #22 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Sorry for the shit.. Spec URL: http://cicku.me/lfcbase.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/lfcbase-1.5.4-2.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=es7h0QjMkMa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 956669] Review Request: erebus - 2D real-time Role-Playing Game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956669
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #2)
Hi Christopher.
Just some initial comments:
- I see some changes about FHS fixes. In my opinion, with a single
modification into 'deployment.pri' file, you can resolve all at one time ;)
Thanks! I'm not familiar with Qt, now I remember this~
- .desktop file is already in the source archive; why do you add another one
as Source1 ?
Its bundled desktop file is invalid and doesn't match Fedora's standard, I
think rewriting one is better than patching.
- %{_datadir}/%{name} directory must be owned by the package
You mean I should remove the asterisk?
- In erebus_source.txt file, the developer says:
The source code is released under the GPL v3 or later.
Please contact me if you have suggestions, bug fixes or whatever: mark dot
harman at ntlworld dot com .
I don't see any license file included, apart from docs/gpl.txt file that is
not the GPLv3+ text file.
Ok, I've mailed the author, hope he can fix that.
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jQkpXGRuJda=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 959974] Review Request: lfcbase - Lemke Foundation Classes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959974
--- Comment #23 from Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com ---
rpmlint is fine, now.
but still:
GPL (v3 or later)
-
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/builddir/build/BUILD/lfcbase-1.5.4/src/base64.c
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/builddir/build/BUILD/lfcbase-1.5.4/src/base64.h
copyright-header from base64.*:
/*
* Copyright (C), 2000-2007 by the monit project group.
* All Rights Reserved.
*
* This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
* (at your option) any later version.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program. If not, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/.
*/
which build objects liblfcbase.so is linked against, so in spec should be:
Name: lfcbase
Version: 1.5.4
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Lemke Foundation Classes
- License: GPLv2
+ License: GPLv2+ and GPLv3+
(suggestion: or ask upstream to upgrade license to GPLv3+ completely...)
If fixed in spec, I'll give fedora-review(+).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DgGBgMkVGna=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 947071] Review Request: monitorix - A free, open source, lightweight system monitoring tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947071 --- Comment #15 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Hi Robin, 1)Upstream provide a not good system unit file IMO, and logrotate file also. 2)Fixed. 3)I don't know if I create the sub packages I should Add Requires for httpd or lighthttpd? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tTaHCjxYuBa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924377] Review Request: mate-user-share - Mate user file sharing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924377 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com --- Looks good now. approved! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PSW2ciF8oha=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 947071] Review Request: monitorix - A free, open source, lightweight system monitoring tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947071 --- Comment #16 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #15) Hi Robin, 1)Upstream provide a not good system unit file IMO, and logrotate file also. Since upstream provides equivalent files, you should provide patches instead of replacing files. And then patches must be sent upstream and each come with a comment in the specfile. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment 3)I don't know if I create the sub packages I should Add Requires for httpd or lighthttpd? I don't fill splitting sub-packages is a necessary and perfect enhancement for this package. Just go ahead with other issues. After all, you must check the [!] items in the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NeiqZcgwuFa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 964143] Review Request: python-testscenarios - Testscenarios, a pyunit extension for dependency injection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964143 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- $ rpmlint -i -v * python-testscenarios.src: I: checking python-testscenarios.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) pyunit - impunity The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. python-testscenarios.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unittest - unit test, unit-test, unities The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. python-testscenarios.src: I: checking-url https://launchpad.net/testscenarios (timeout 10 seconds) python-testscenarios.src: I: checking-url http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/t/testscenarios/testscenarios-0.4.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) python-testscenarios.noarch: I: checking python-testscenarios.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) pyunit - impunity The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. python-testscenarios.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unittest - unit test, unit-test, unities The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. python-testscenarios.noarch: I: checking-url https://launchpad.net/testscenarios (timeout 10 seconds) python-testscenarios.noarch: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. python-testscenarios.spec: I: checking-url http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/t/testscenarios/testscenarios-0.4.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. Please add the doc files from the tarball to the package: Apache-2.0 COPYING GOALS BSD HACKING NEWS README The package is dual-licensed (Apache and BSD) which should be refelected in the license tag. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nS4976FWBda=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924377] Review Request: mate-user-share - Mate user file sharing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924377 Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de --- Thank you for the review Hans. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: mate-user-share Short Description: Mate user file sharing Owners: raveit65 Branches: f17 f18 f19 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=a3IFttDi9wa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bjoern.es...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aqdlzG1ZFWa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 960041] Review Request: lfcxml - Lemke Foundation Classes XML extension
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960041 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bjoern.es...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fkN6ziDt9Ma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 852185] Review Request: nfacct - Command line tool to create/retrieve/delete accounting objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852185 --- Comment #15 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- Any progress here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EpZRNm2CQva=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 915427] Review Request: python-zc-customdoctests - Use doctest with other languages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915427 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2013-05-20 06:44:37 --- Comment #15 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- Packages are in the stable repos for all requested branches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PXE69IbN35a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 916436] Review Request: python-narcissus-app - WSGI components for Narcissus, realtime log visualization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916436 Bug 916436 depends on bug 916419, which changed state. Bug 916419 Summary: Review Request: python-tw2-slideymenu - toscawidgets2 wrapper for a slidey menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916419 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fue3CWJObia=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 916419] Review Request: python-tw2-slideymenu - toscawidgets2 wrapper for a slidey menu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916419 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2013-05-20 06:47:37 --- Comment #7 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- Packages are in the stable repos for all requested branches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mhCGYB2vcKa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963604] Review Request: python-pdfrw - Python library to read and write PDF files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963604 Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||957835 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6Gl1O2zKyla=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 916431] Review Request: python-tw2-jqplugins-jqplot - Toscawidgets2 wrapper for the jqPlot jQuery plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916431 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2013-05-20 06:51:03 --- Comment #13 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- Packages are in the stable repos for all requested branches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CPm12I07i9a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 916436] Review Request: python-narcissus-app - WSGI components for Narcissus, realtime log visualization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916436 Bug 916436 depends on bug 916431, which changed state. Bug 916431 Summary: Review Request: python-tw2-jqplugins-jqplot - Toscawidgets2 wrapper for the jqPlot jQuery plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916431 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OjmD6e4kLka=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 916436] Review Request: python-narcissus-app - WSGI components for Narcissus, realtime log visualization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916436 Bug 916436 depends on bug 916426, which changed state. Bug 916426 Summary: Review Request: python-narcissus-common - Common components for Narcissus, realtime log visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916426 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kERjW8KVpVa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 916426] Review Request: python-narcissus-common - Common components for Narcissus, realtime log visualization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916426 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2013-05-20 06:52:35 --- Comment #14 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- Packages are in the stable repos for all requested branches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XNIGP850V3a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924279] Review Request: mate-character-map - Unicode character picker and font browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924279 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- I'll do the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VpRucQFa4ea=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821146] Review Request: jruby-rack - Rack adapter for JRuby and Servlet Containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821146 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it Flags||needinfo?(puntogil@libero.i ||t) --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu --- I am triaging old review tickets. I can't promise a review if you reply, but by closing out the stale tickets we can devote extra attention to the ones which aren't stale. Build fails for me: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5398903 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GE8jWNBb7ta=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924279] Review Request: mate-character-map - Unicode character picker and font browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924279
--- Comment #5 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Somewhat strange: Is it really intended to have the localization and help files
in a -data subpackage which is anyway installed as a dependency? If you
recognize the help files too large, put them into a -doc subpackage. This way
the users consider it correctly. The localization files should remain in the
main package, as usual for other software (e.g. for GNOME). Or are there
special rules for MATE packages which are not covered by the packaging
guidelines yet? In any case, the current behavior is confusing for me.
%{_libdir}/girepository-1.0
Your package owns the whole folder. But it is already owned by
gobject-introspection. Please use %{_libdir}/girepository-1.0/* instead. Due to
the gobject-introspection-devel build requirement, the runtime dependency
should be picked up automatically.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=besh1FbnXOa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 965095] New: python-rsa - Pure-Python RSA implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965095 Bug ID: 965095 Summary: python-rsa - Pure-Python RSA implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: yohangratero...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://yograterol.fedorapeople.org/python-rsa.spec SRPM URL: http://yograterol.fedorapeople.org/python-rsa-3.1.1-1.fc18.src.rpm Pure-Python RSA implementation FAS Username: yograterol -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=y4jQvXamEfa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858084] Review Request: mingw-qt5-qtwebkit - Qt5 for Windows - QtWebKit component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858084
--- Comment #11 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl ---
By un-bundling ANGLE and using the shared library from the mingw-angleproject
package (which was already used by mingw-qt5-qtbase) we managed to get the size
of the Qt5WebKit.dll library reduced with 2,7MB (from 23,7MB to 21MB)! The
build logs are now also much easier to read due to the backported patches which
resolve a flood of compiler warnings when using gcc 4.8
Updated Spec URL:
http://svn.nntpgrab.nl/svn/fedora_cross/mingw-qt5-qtwebkit/mingw-qt5-qtwebkit.spec
Updated SRPM URL:
http://koji.vanpienbroek.nl/kojifiles/packages/mingw-qt5-qtwebkit/5.0.2/2.fc20/src/mingw-qt5-qtwebkit-5.0.2-2.fc20.src.rpm
Koji scratch build: http://koji.vanpienbroek.nl/koji/buildinfo?buildID=147
* Sat May 18 2013 Erik van Pienbroek epien...@fedoraproject.org - 5.0.2-2
- Bumped the BR: mingw{32,64}-angleproject to = 0-0.5.svn2215.20130517
- Don't use the bundled ANGLE libraries any more
- Applied some upstream patches to prevent flooding the logs with
compiler warnings when using gcc 4.8
- Added BR: mingw32-qt5-qtmultimedia mingw64-qt5-qtmultimedia
- Added BR: mingw32-libwebp mingw64-libwebp
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=N2EnURHDuCa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 965095] python-rsa - Pure-Python RSA implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965095 --- Comment #1 from Yohan Graterol yohangratero...@gmail.com --- Test with koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5399455 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QOwFcrla3fa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962744] Review Request: perl-Number-WithError - Numbers with error propagation and scientific rounding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962744 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5TRzBZmnaza=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 960056] Review Request: rubygem-debug_inspector - A Ruby wrapper for the MRI 2.0 debug_inspector API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960056 Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jstri...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jstri...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com --- I will take it for a review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ktN9Rtgcqfa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 907924] Review Request: perl-Stream-Buffered - Temporary buffer to save bytes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907924 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vU0JgN6L5ja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924279] Review Request: mate-character-map - Unicode character picker and font browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924279
--- Comment #6 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de ---
Mario,
thank you for doing the review and for your hints.
I've removed the -data subpackage.
New mock build:
* Mon May 20 2013 Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de - 1.6.0-3
- do not own %%{_libdir}/girepository-1.0
- remove -data subpackage
- remove %%check and use %%install for desktop-file-validate
Spec URL: http://raveit65.fedorapeople.org/Mate/SPECS/mate-character-map.spec
SRPM URL:
http://raveit65.fedorapeople.org/Mate/SRPM/mate-character-map-1.6.0-3.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3o1stH6tlHa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924377] Review Request: mate-user-share - Mate user file sharing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924377 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Fu98awYGyOa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924377] Review Request: mate-user-share - Mate user file sharing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924377 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=351K3aBaM5a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958358] Review Request: darkhttpd - A secure, lightweight, fast, single-threaded HTTP/1.1 server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958358 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=76B4CnbgXQa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 958358] Review Request: darkhttpd - A secure, lightweight, fast, single-threaded HTTP/1.1 server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958358 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mq1GrF70Laa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 960200] Review Request: libyui-qt - Qt User Interface for libyui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960200 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yuhxwCZXCIa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 960200] Review Request: libyui-qt - Qt User Interface for libyui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960200 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AQhq9qUm3Fa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962744] Review Request: perl-Number-WithError - Numbers with error propagation and scientific rounding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962744 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- I haven't found any issues with in this package. Approving. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fnQBWWE14aa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 927237] Review Request: owfs - 1-Wire Virtual File System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927237 --- Comment #9 from Lorenzo Dalrio lorenzo.dal...@gmail.com --- Tomasz, the python sub-package need to BuildRequires: python2-devel and not Requires: python-devel [1]. This is my fault, i led you to mistake, sorry. shell, mon and tap sub-packages do not have a dependency on libs sub-package. If i have correctly understand, owfs-libs in this case is our base package and has to be required by sub-packages. [2] [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=w8uPF3tOdla=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961445] Review Request: mingw-winstorecompat - MinGW library to help porting to Windows Store
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961445 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rnhs5qobACa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961445] Review Request: mingw-winstorecompat - MinGW library to help porting to Windows Store
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961445 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IPCvUj2t91a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962813] Review Request: funguloids - Space-Flying-Mushroom-Picking-Simulator game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962813 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sHX2yDtTAga=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962813] Review Request: funguloids - Space-Flying-Mushroom-Picking-Simulator game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962813 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zK9MPJW97Ma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963074] Review Request: librime - Rime Input Method Engine Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963074 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5zc8GuqbrDa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963074] Review Request: librime - Rime Input Method Engine Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963074 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=twYqFgGYOqa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963265] Review Request: freecode-submit - A tool help submit release information to freecode.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963265 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Oshwv99r1ka=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963265] Review Request: freecode-submit - A tool help submit release information to freecode.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963265 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RtMybb1whPa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963339] Review Request: libyui-bindings - Language bindings for libyui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963339 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Tpe43ow1CLa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963339] Review Request: libyui-bindings - Language bindings for libyui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963339 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UmuismLrofa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963693] Review Request: jenkins-commons-jelly - Open and customizable XML processing engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963693 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=idg0UPT868a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963693] Review Request: jenkins-commons-jelly - Open and customizable XML processing engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963693 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lcpWRfOnhsa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 964412] Review Request: php-tcpdf - PHP class for generating PDF documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964412 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7jzoxzdvPma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 964412] Review Request: php-tcpdf - PHP class for generating PDF documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964412 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IHQJm8Tvn3a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 955804] Review Request: nzbget - Command-line based binary newsgrabber for nzb files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955804 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Unretired, take ownership in pkgdb and submit Package Change request for additional braches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2RSEO6dBBVa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 955804] Review Request: nzbget - Command-line based binary newsgrabber for nzb files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955804 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xh2ntl43Zda=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 928609] Review Request: xpra - screen for X
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928609 --- Comment #19 from Antoine Martin anto...@nagafix.co.uk --- More bugfixes today (some more important ones this time around). Just (wrongly) posted this on the rpmfusion ticket: I haven't tested systemd integration, but others have: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Xpra#Server -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=O6lFsYQQVha=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963213] Review Request: perl-HTTP-CookieJar - Minimalist HTTP user agent cookie jar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963213 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- Alright, all fixed. Approving. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9EY11tQki9a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858077] Review Request: mingw-qt5-qtsensors - Qt5 for Windows - QtSensors component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858077
greg.helli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||greg.helli...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|greg.helli...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #4 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
$ rpmlint mingw-qt5-qtsensors.spec
mingw-qt5-qtsensors.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{qt_module}
mingw-qt5-qtsensors.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{snapshot_rev}
mingw-qt5-qtsensors.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{qt_module}
mingw-qt5-qtsensors.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{snapshot_rev}
mingw-qt5-qtsensors.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: qt5-qtsensors-ceec1eda.tar.gz
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
$ rpmlint mingw-qt5-qtsensors-5.0.0-0.5.git20130510.ceec1eda.fc20.src.rpm
mingw-qt5-qtsensors.src: E: unknown-key GPG#9b393ae8
mingw-qt5-qtsensors.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{qt_module}
mingw-qt5-qtsensors.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{snapshot_rev}
mingw-qt5-qtsensors.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{qt_module}
mingw-qt5-qtsensors.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{snapshot_rev}
mingw-qt5-qtsensors.src: W: invalid-url Source0: qt5-qtsensors-ceec1eda.tar.gz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings.
$ rpmlint
results_mingw-qt5-qtsensors/5.0.0/0.5.git20130510.ceec1eda.fc18/mingw*.noarch.rpm
mingw32-qt5-qtsensors.noarch: W: no-documentation
mingw32-qt5-qtsensors-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources
mingw64-qt5-qtsensors.noarch: W: no-documentation
mingw64-qt5-qtsensors-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpm -q --requires mingw32-qt5-qtsensors
rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
mingw32-crt
mingw32-filesystem = 83
mingw32(kernel32.dll)
mingw32(libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll)
mingw32(libstdc++-6.dll)
mingw32(msvcrt.dll)
mingw32(qt5core.dll)
mingw32(qt5qml.dll)
mingw32(qt5sensors.dll)
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1
$ rpm -q --requires mingw64-qt5-qtsensors
rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
mingw64-crt
mingw64-filesystem = 83
mingw64(kernel32.dll)
mingw64(libstdc++-6.dll)
mingw64(msvcrt.dll)
mingw64(qt5core.dll)
mingw64(qt5qml.dll)
mingw64(qt5sensors.dll)
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1
$ rpm -q --provides mingw32-qt5-qtsensors
mingw32-qt5-qtsensors = 5.0.0-0.5.git20130510.ceec1eda.fc18
mingw32(qt5sensors.dll)
mingw32(qtsensorgestures_plugin.dll)
mingw32(qtsensorgestures_shakeplugin.dll)
mingw32(qtsensors_dummy.dll)
mingw32(qtsensors_generic.dll)
mingw32(declarative_sensors.dll)
$ rpm -q --provides mingw64-qt5-qtsensors
mingw64-qt5-qtsensors = 5.0.0-0.5.git20130510.ceec1eda.fc18
mingw64(qt5sensors.dll)
mingw64(qtsensorgestures_plugin.dll)
mingw64(qtsensorgestures_shakeplugin.dll)
mingw64(qtsensors_dummy.dll)
mingw64(qtsensors_generic.dll)
mingw64(declarative_sensors.dll)
+ OK
! Needs to be looked into
/ Not applicable
[+] Compliant with generic Fedora Packaging Guidelines
[+] Source package name is prefixed with 'mingw-'
[+] Spec file starts with %{?mingw_package_header}
[+] BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem = 95 is in the .spec file
[+] BuildRequires: mingw64-filesystem = 95 is in the .spec file
[+] Spec file contains %package sections for both mingw32 and mingw64 packages
[+] Binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are noarch
[+] Spec file contains %{?mingw_debug_package} after the %description section
[+] Uses one of the macros %mingw_configure, %mingw_cmake, %mingw_cmake_kde4
or %mingw_qmake_qt5 to configure the package
[+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to build the package
[+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to install the package
[+] If package contains translations, the %mingw_find_lang macro must be used
[+] No binary package named mingw-$pkgname is generated
[+] Libtool .la files are not bundled
[+] .def files are not bundled
[+] Man pages which duplicate native package are not bundled
[+] Info files which duplicate native package are not bundled
[+] Provides of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal
[+] Requires of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal
All of the discrepancies and warnings have been discussed before and are
acceptable.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1QCSdsxTNia=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961141] Review Request: debhelper - Helper programs for debian/rules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961141 --- Comment #29 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ser...@serjux.com --- Spec URL: http://oron.fedorapeople.org/deb-package/debhelper.spec SRPM URL: http://oron.fedorapeople.org/deb-package/debhelper-9.20120909-1.fc20.src.rpm for: fedora-review -b 961141 INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 961141 INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : 961141 ERROR: 'Cannot find source rpm URL' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NphH94jkMaa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963213] Review Request: perl-HTTP-CookieJar - Minimalist HTTP user agent cookie jar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963213 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-HTTP-CookieJar Short Description: Minimalist HTTP user agent cookie jar Owners: yaneti Branches: f19 InitialCC: perl-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=uhVpaJms89a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 952355] Review Request: hovercraft - Makes impress.js presentations from reStructuredText
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952355 --- Comment #5 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- Regarding python3-lxml, noted. I'll only request an f19 branch. License ping with upstream This is non-blocking, correct? https://github.com/regebro/hovercraft/issues/25 Here's a new release with the BSD comment added: Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/hovercraft.spec SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/hovercraft-1.1-2.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wmTXjhtwCia=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 960200] Review Request: libyui-qt - Qt User Interface for libyui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960200 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2xn7FGV8HGa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 960200] Review Request: libyui-qt - Qt User Interface for libyui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960200 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libyui-qt-2.43.3-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libyui-qt-2.43.3-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qe4FOFWQkoa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 960200] Review Request: libyui-qt - Qt User Interface for libyui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960200 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libyui-qt-2.43.3-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libyui-qt-2.43.3-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=uGxalAOALKa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 952355] Review Request: hovercraft - Makes impress.js presentations from reStructuredText
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952355 Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com --- Regarding python3-lxml: feel free to request F18/F17 branches, as you will be able to build/push those as soon as the python3-lxml 3.2.1 builds that are currently in testing land in stable. Thanks for updating spec file with license. This package is APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fQ6fp3k5Yea=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963339] Review Request: libyui-bindings - Language bindings for libyui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963339 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nBK8mNLXDOa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963339] Review Request: libyui-bindings - Language bindings for libyui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963339 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libyui-bindings-1.0.1-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libyui-bindings-1.0.1-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AHE56jDoOZa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963339] Review Request: libyui-bindings - Language bindings for libyui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963339 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libyui-bindings-1.0.1-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libyui-bindings-1.0.1-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ox5qbBLffba=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 818964] Review Request: staxmate - Light-weight Java framework for streaming XML processing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818964 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(puntogil@libero.i | |t) | --- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- hi, problem was caused by missing build dep: maven-local Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/staxmate.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/staxmate-2.2.0-1.fc18.src.rpm - update to 2.2.0 Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5400121 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TsPYqFw8L9a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963213] Review Request: perl-HTTP-CookieJar - Minimalist HTTP user agent cookie jar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963213 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=yMSSa3CQOia=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 963213] Review Request: perl-HTTP-CookieJar - Minimalist HTTP user agent cookie jar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963213 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=71jnibUtWNa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858061] Review Request: mingw-qt5-qt3d - Qt5 for Windows - Qt3d component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858061
greg.helli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||greg.helli...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|greg.helli...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
$ rpmlint mingw-qt5-qtjsbackend.spec
$ rpmlint mingw-qt5-qtjsbackend-5.0.1-1.fc19.src.rpm
$ rpmlint
results_mingw-qt5-qtjsbackend/5.0.1/1.fc18/mingw32-qt5-qtjsbackend-5.0.1-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
results_mingw-qt5-qtjsbackend/5.0.1/1.fc18/mingw64-qt5-qtjsbackend-5.0.1-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
$ rpm -q --requires mingw32-qt5-qtjsbackend
$ rpm -q --requires mingw64-qt5-qtjsbackend
$ rpm -q --provides mingw32-qt5-qtjsbackend
$ rpm -q --provides mingw64-qt5-qtjsbackend
$ wget --quiet
http://releases.qt-project.org/qt5/5.0.1/submodules_tar/qtjsbackend-opensource-src-5.0.1.tar.xz
-O - | md5sum
af5ccb9d5ab589df03eb0b12fb5ab4cd -
$ md5sum
qtjsbackend-opensource-src-5.0.1.tar.xzaf5ccb9d5ab589df03eb0b12fb5ab4cd
qtjsbackend-opensource-src-5.0.1.tar.xz
af5ccb9d5ab589df03eb0b12fb5ab4cd qtjsbackend-opensource-src-5.0.1.tar.xz
+ OK
! Needs to be looked into
/ Not applicable
[+] Compliant with generic Fedora Packaging Guidelines
[+] Source package name is prefixed with 'mingw-'
[+] Spec file starts with %{?mingw_package_header}
[+] BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem = 95 is in the .spec file
[+] BuildRequires: mingw64-filesystem = 95 is in the .spec file
[+] Spec file contains %package sections for both mingw32 and mingw64 packages
[+] Binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are noarch
[+] Spec file contains %{?mingw_debug_package} after the %description section
[+] Uses one of the macros %mingw_configure, %mingw_cmake, %mingw_cmake_kde4
or %mingw_qmake_qt5 to configure the package
[+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to build the package
[+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to install the package
[+] If package contains translations, the %mingw_find_lang macro must be used
[+] No binary package named mingw-$pkgname is generated
[+] Libtool .la files are not bundled
[+] .def files are not bundled
[+] Man pages which duplicate native package are not bundled
[+] Info files which duplicate native package are not bundled
[+] Provides of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal
[+] Requires of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=btdgPMnLYka=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 952355] Review Request: hovercraft - Makes impress.js presentations from reStructuredText
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952355 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: hovercraft Short Description: Makes impress.js presentations from reStructuredText Owners: ralph Branches: f19 f18 f17 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LSqkQ8ZBBDa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858061] Review Request: mingw-qt5-qt3d - Qt5 for Windows - Qt3d component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858061
greg.helli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to greg.hellings from comment #3)
Whoops, submitted the review template instead of the review! Let me try that
again...
$ rpmlint *.spec
mingw-qt5-qt3d.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{qt_module}
mingw-qt5-qt3d.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{snapshot_rev}
mingw-qt5-qt3d.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{qt_module}
mingw-qt5-qt3d.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{snapshot_rev}
mingw-qt5-qt3d.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: qt5-qt3d-0158ce78.tar.gz
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
$ rpmlint mingw-qt5-qt3d-5.0.0-0.4.git20130510.0158ce78.fc20.src.rpm
mingw-qt5-qt3d.src: E: unknown-key GPG#9b393ae8
mingw-qt5-qt3d.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{qt_module}
mingw-qt5-qt3d.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{snapshot_rev}
mingw-qt5-qt3d.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{qt_module}
mingw-qt5-qt3d.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{snapshot_rev}
mingw-qt5-qt3d.src: W: invalid-url Source0: qt5-qt3d-0158ce78.tar.gz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings.
$ rpmlint
results_mingw-qt5-qt3d/5.0.0/0.4.git20130510.0158ce78.fc18/mingw{32,64}*
mingw32-qt5-qt3d-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources
mingw64-qt5-qt3d-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpm -q --requires mingw32-qt5-qt3d
rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
mingw32-crt
mingw32-filesystem = 83
mingw32(kernel32.dll)
mingw32(libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll)
mingw32(libglesv2.dll)
mingw32(libstdc++-6.dll)
mingw32(msvcrt.dll)
mingw32(qt53d.dll)
mingw32(qt53dquick.dll)
mingw32(qt5core.dll)
mingw32(qt5gui.dll)
mingw32(qt5network.dll)
mingw32(qt5opengl.dll)
mingw32(qt5qml.dll)
mingw32(qt5quick.dll)
mingw32(qt5widgets.dll)
mingw32(user32.dll)
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1
$ rpm -q --requires mingw64-qt5-qt3d
rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
mingw64-crt
mingw64-filesystem = 83
mingw64(kernel32.dll)
mingw64(libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll)
mingw64(libglesv2.dll)
mingw64(libstdc++-6.dll)
mingw64(msvcrt.dll)
mingw64(qt53d.dll)
mingw64(qt53dquick.dll)
mingw64(qt5core.dll)
mingw64(qt5gui.dll)
mingw64(qt5network.dll)
mingw64(qt5opengl.dll)
mingw64(qt5qml.dll)
mingw64(qt5quick.dll)
mingw64(qt5widgets.dll)
mingw64(user32.dll)
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1
$ rpm -q --provides mingw32-qt5-qt3d
mingw32-qt5-qt3d = 5.0.0-0.4.git20130510.0158ce78.fc18
mingw32(qt53d.dll)
mingw32(qt53dquick.dll)
mingw32(qthreedqmlplugin.dll)
$ rpm -q --provides mingw64-qt5-qt3d
mingw64-qt5-qt3d = 5.0.0-0.4.git20130510.0158ce78.fc18
mingw64(qt53d.dll)
mingw64(qt53dquick.dll)
mingw64(qthreedqmlplugin.dll)
+ OK
! Needs to be looked into
/ Not applicable
[+] Compliant with generic Fedora Packaging Guidelines
[+] Source package name is prefixed with 'mingw-'
[+] Spec file starts with %{?mingw_package_header}
[+] BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem = 95 is in the .spec file
[+] BuildRequires: mingw64-filesystem = 95 is in the .spec file
[+] Spec file contains %package sections for both mingw32 and mingw64 packages
[+] Binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are noarch
[+] Spec file contains %{?mingw_debug_package} after the %description section
[+] Uses one of the macros %mingw_configure, %mingw_cmake, %mingw_cmake_kde4
or %mingw_qmake_qt5 to configure the package
[+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to build the package
[+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to install the package
[+] If package contains translations, the %mingw_find_lang macro must be used
[+] No binary package named mingw-$pkgname is generated
[+] Libtool .la files are not bundled
[+] .def files are not bundled
[+] Man pages which duplicate native package are not bundled
[+] Info files which duplicate native package are not bundled
[+] Provides of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal
[+] Requires of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal
Passes muster with the same types of scenarios as other Qt5 packages.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7mRjKW3FCPa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 632856] Review Request: xinput_calibrator - A generic touchscreen calibration program for X.Org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632856 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Whiteboard|AwaitingSubmitter | Last Closed||2013-05-20 10:38:34 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=uq2bOmCOgea=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 877275] Review Request: lhapdf - Les Houches Accord PDF Interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877275 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bjoern.es...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=USOm3fGTRAa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 877396] Review Request: HepMC - C++ Event Record for Monte Carlo Generators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877396 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bjoern.es...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pbhvzvgfGCa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 877607] Review Request: pythia8 - Pythia Event Generator for High Energy Physics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877607 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bjoern.es...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bUlt5IGTCja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 619437] Review Request: bm - Rpm package building helper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619437 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Whiteboard|AwaitingSubmitter | Last Closed||2013-05-20 10:39:50 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Wo2qL6NzRUa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961141] Review Request: debhelper - Helper programs for debian/rules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961141 Sergio Monteiro Basto ser...@serjux.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #30 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ser...@serjux.com --- Package APPROVED , you may proceed with SCM request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1AbA0mmuiNa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858077] Review Request: mingw-qt5-qtsensors - Qt5 for Windows - QtSensors component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858077 greg.helli...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hs3mwwaptra=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 952355] Review Request: hovercraft - Makes impress.js presentations from reStructuredText
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952355 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Nm36SizlWSa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 952355] Review Request: hovercraft - Makes impress.js presentations from reStructuredText
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952355 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ojugiiBCIxa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924377] Review Request: mate-user-share - Mate user file sharing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924377 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qglKEwLCP1a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924377] Review Request: mate-user-share - Mate user file sharing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924377 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mate-user-share-1.6.0-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mate-user-share-1.6.0-3.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ye7yxUTBbBa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 924377] Review Request: mate-user-share - Mate user file sharing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924377 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mate-user-share-1.6.0-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mate-user-share-1.6.0-3.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wDTBGPUOJEa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
