[Bug 1022283] Review Request: gnulib - GNU Portability Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022283 --- Comment #27 from Mosaab Alzoubi moc...@hotmail.com --- Fixes after Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek revision: - Remove prebuilt java class. - gnulib-docs require gnulib. - List all licenses. - Replace define by global. Spec URL: http://ojuba.org/oji/SPECS/gnulib.spec SRPM URL: http://ojuba.org/oji/SRPMS/gnulib-20131027.git5191b35-2.oji.fc19.src.rpm Thank You. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1015778] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-openid - A library for consuming and serving OpenID identities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- (In reply to Ken Dreyer from comment #8) The PNGs' executable bits is a bug in the rdoc gem. I've submitted https://github.com/rdoc/rdoc/pull/258 to fix this. Ah, I did not notice this. Would you open a tracker bug for Fedora side? For this package, approving. This package (rubygem-ruby-openid) is APPROVED by mtasaka -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1022255] Review Request: libltc - Linear/Longitudinal Time Code (LTC) Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255 Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libltc Short Description: Linear/Longitudinal Time Code (LTC) Library Owners: nphilipp Branches: f18 f19 f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1022255] Review Request: libltc - Linear/Longitudinal Time Code (LTC) Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255 --- Comment #24 from Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com --- I concur with Björn why the autofoo files may be not quite up to date. Anyway, this is an artifact of not having official tarballs (which would contain a configure script unlike the on-the-fly generated ones by github that aren't the result of make dist), and doesn't concern me too much. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1023879] New: Review Request: php-solarium - Solarium PHP Solr client library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023879 Bug ID: 1023879 Summary: Review Request: php-solarium - Solarium PHP Solr client library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: fed...@famillecollet.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/remicollet/remirepo/cdcd2259e64b462ff8e403ea2296924e0819c7c6/php/php-solarium/php-solarium.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-solarium-3.1.2-1.remi.src.rpm Description: Solarium is a PHP Solr client library that accurately model Solr concepts. Where many other Solr libraries only handle the communication with Solr, Solarium also relieves you of handling all the complex Solr query parameters using a well documented API. Documentation: http://wiki.solarium-project.org/ Fedora Account System Username: remi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016803] Review Request: rodent-icon-theme - SVG scalable icon theme by Rodent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016803 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=860313 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1019435] Review Request: fluid - Library for fluid and dynamic applications development with QtQuick
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019435 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk --- Hi, thank you for your suggestions. (In reply to Eduardo Echeverria from comment #1) Hi @Lkundrak: - Can you handle the Source url, under this scheme? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Github. I can not; that document is not up to date. Github no longer allows adding files to archive, nor provides a way to retrieve a sanely named tagged snapshot. I've raised a ticket about that to github, and there isn't much I could do about that until they fix their thing. - Not is a blocker, but pkgconfig retrieve slowly dependencies, I would use the name of the devel-packages The build system looks for pkgconfig files, so this is definitely more correct. It does not appear slow to me -- if it is slow for you it should probably be fixed in RPM instead. - Why do you use ldconfig? I can't see any lib in $LDPATH root No good reason, I'll remove it. - Please , don't use rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT after %install, It is just for el5 packaging, Same applies for %defattr(-,root,root,-) Will do. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1019435] Review Request: fluid - Library for fluid and dynamic applications development with QtQuick
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019435 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk --- SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/fluid.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/fluid-0.1.90-2.20130723git6d6e0cd.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1023356] Review Request: ghc-stm - Software Transactional Memory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023356 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Built for F21 rawhide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1023356] Review Request: ghc-stm - Software Transactional Memory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023356 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|rawhide |20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1021339] Review Request: ghc-events - Library and tool for parsing GHC eventlog files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021339 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: ghc-events |Review Request: ghc-events |- Library and tool for |- Library and tool for |parsing .eventlog files |parsing GHC eventlog files |from GHC| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1023706] Review Request: ghc-zlib - Compression and decompression in the gzip and zlib formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023706 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|unspecified |medium Severity|unspecified |medium -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1017678] Review Request: hibernate-hql - Hibernate Query Parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017678 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Fixed In Version||hibernate-hql-1.0.0-0.2.Alp ||ha5 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-10-28 05:26:14 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005930] Review Request: noggit - JSON streaming parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005930
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
*No copyright* Apache (v2.0).
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java:
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It is
pulled in by maven-local
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
Maven:
[ ]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even
when building with ant
[x]: Pom files have correct Maven mapping
[x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use %{_mavenpomdir} instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires:
[Bug 1014738] Review Request: python-astropy - A Community Python Library for Astronomy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014738 --- Comment #12 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com --- New upstream source Spec URL: http://guaix.fis.ucm.es/~spr/python-astropy.spec SRPM URL: http://guaix.fis.ucm.es/~spr/python-astropy-0.2.5-1.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 970956] Review Request: libclens - A convenience library to aid in porting code from OpenBSD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970956 --- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net --- We don't apply a lib prefix to libraries. We prefer the upstream tarball or project name, which often means the src.rpm %name matches the tarball name. rpm -qf /usr/lib*/lib*.so*|grep -v ^lib|sort|uniq Sometimes, depending on what components a software project builds, it can make sense to build a -libs subpackage. In other cases, the project may include programs, and then the added lib prefix would be a hindrance (and it would be necessary to redefine the binary rpm names completely to be closer to the upstream name). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 967659] Review Request: robojournal - cross-platform journal/diary tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967659 Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | Blocks|1009703 | --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net --- *** Bug 1009703 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009703 [Bug 1009703] Review Request: roboJournal - Keep a journal/diary of day-to-day events in your life -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1009703] Review Request: roboJournal - Keep a journal/diary of day-to-day events in your life
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009703 Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||bugs.mich...@gmx.net Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Depends On|967659 | Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2013-10-28 06:29:30 --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net --- As outlined in the private email conversation, please continue in the existing review ticket bug 967659 with a complete pair of Spec URL: and SRPM URL: lines for the updated package. That would also make it possible to run fedora-review -b 967659 for letting it perform several helpful checks. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 967659 *** Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967659 [Bug 967659] Review Request: robojournal - cross-platform journal/diary tool -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 970407] Review Request: mingw-libtheora - Theora Video Compression Codec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970407 --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net --- Also, I've had a look at whether there is a Fedora MinGW SIG, and there is one http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW including an own mailing-list. There are a lot of pending review requests according to the query they have linked on that page, so there is a lot to do. I highly recommend getting in touch with them for any progress. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 807821] Review request: ns-3 Network Simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807821 Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||NotReady -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821917] Review Request: mu - maildir utility with Emacs support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821917
Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugs.mich...@gmx.net
--- Comment #17 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
* fedora-review -b 821917 fails due to a build failure. Give it a try.
* Manual rpmbuild on Fedora 20 development also fails:
checking for xapian-config... xapian-config
configure: error: *** xapian version = 1.2 needed, but version 1.2.15 found.
make %{?_smp_mflags}
Build output is non-verbose. Figure out whether can configure with
--disable-silent-rules, whether running V=1 make … works, or whether patching
the Makefiles may be needed.
Only then it would become possible to see the used compiler/link flags and
options and e.g. verify them.
%install
rm -rf %{buildroot}
Buildroot is created and emptied automatically nowadays, so preferably be
explicit about whether the spec file is supposed to target EL5:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
is not needed anymore for any of the active dists (even EL5):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_Permissions
%{_datadir}/man/man*/*.gz
%{_datadir}/man/man*/* is what many reviewers recommend, because it allows for
changed/customised/disabled compression of manual pages.
* Without being able to build the package, I can only point out that I find its
inter-dependencies too complicated:
emacs-mu4e-el requires emacs-mu4e, which in turn requires emacs(bin) and mu
but
emacs-mu4e-el additionally requires emacs and mu
so the dependency on emacs and mu is redundant, and since I wondered why
splitting of the source files into a separate subpackage would be justified,
I've searched a bit in the packaging guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Emacs#Packaging_of_source_elisp_files
That part of the guidelines explains several scenarios. Splitting of -el
subpackages for the source files has been done only up to Fedora 16. It's even
possible to include the files in the base mu package with a proper dep on
emacs-filesystem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 819678] Review Request: cmake28 - A package of CMake 2.8.x for EL6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819678 --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 819678] Review Request: cmake28 - A package of CMake 2.8.x for EL6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819678 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821455] Review Request: python-trml2pdf12 - Tiny RML2PDF is a tool to easily create PDF documents without programming
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821455 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821455] Review Request: python-trml2pdf12 - Tiny RML2PDF is a tool to easily create PDF documents without programming
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821455 --- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 965443] Review Request: mod_auth_openid - OpenID authentication for apache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965443 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). f20 already existed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 965443] Review Request: mod_auth_openid - OpenID authentication for apache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965443 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1015958] Review Request: fst - run VST plugins under wine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015958 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1015958] Review Request: fst - run VST plugins under wine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015958 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016170] Review Request: ncdc - A modern and lightweight direct connect client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016170 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016170] Review Request: ncdc - A modern and lightweight direct connect client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016170 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016677] Review Request: mathjax - JavaScript library to render math in the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016677 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016677] Review Request: mathjax - JavaScript library to render math in the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016677 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016807] Review Request: tubo - Library to thread process std-in/std-err/std-out from fork() child
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016807 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016807] Review Request: tubo - Library to thread process std-in/std-err/std-out from fork() child
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016807 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1018384] Review Request: tinyca2 - TinyCA graphical openssl based CA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018384 --- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1018384] Review Request: tinyca2 - TinyCA graphical openssl based CA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018384 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1022255] Review Request: libltc - Linear/Longitudinal Time Code (LTC) Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1022255] Review Request: libltc - Linear/Longitudinal Time Code (LTC) Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255 --- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1023356] Review Request: ghc-stm - Software Transactional Memory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023356 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1023356] Review Request: ghc-stm - Software Transactional Memory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023356 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1023429] Review Request: jberet - Batch Applications Implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023429 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1023429] Review Request: jberet - Batch Applications Implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023429 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016677] Review Request: mathjax - JavaScript library to render math in the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016677 --- Comment #12 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- could you consider supporting epel-6 too? (I've a el6 site @work that would greatly benefit from it). Though it would appear web-assets stuff doesn't support epel-6 (yet, afaict). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1023619] Review Request: perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Callback - Send Log::Any logs to a subroutine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023619 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1023619] Review Request: perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Callback - Send Log::Any logs to a subroutine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023619 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995933] Re-Review Request: mlmmj - A simple and slim mailing list manager inspired by ezmlm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995933 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Unretired f19 and devel, please take ownership in pkgdb and submit a Package Change Request to add f20. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995933] Re-Review Request: mlmmj - A simple and slim mailing list manager inspired by ezmlm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995933 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016677] Review Request: mathjax - JavaScript library to render math in the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016677 --- Comment #13 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl --- (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #12) could you consider supporting epel-6 too? (I've a el6 site @work that would greatly benefit from it). Though it would appear web-assets stuff doesn't support epel-6 (yet, afaict). In principle I have nothing against the idea, but I know next to nothing EPEL, I probably wouldn't have any way to test the package. Let's first see if the package works properly in Fedora proper. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1023848] Review Request: closure-compiler - JavaScript minifier and checker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023848 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1023832 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023832 [Bug 1023832] guava: please package upstream version 1.15 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1022255] Review Request: libltc - Linear/Longitudinal Time Code (LTC) Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255 --- Comment #26 from Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com --- I've notified Robin Gareus and he'll look into the autotools thing: https://github.com/x42/libltc/issues/9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1022255] Review Request: libltc - Linear/Longitudinal Time Code (LTC) Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1022255] Review Request: libltc - Linear/Longitudinal Time Code (LTC) Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libltc-1.1.2-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libltc-1.1.2-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1022255] Review Request: libltc - Linear/Longitudinal Time Code (LTC) Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libltc-1.1.2-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libltc-1.1.2-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1022255] Review Request: libltc - Linear/Longitudinal Time Code (LTC) Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libltc-1.1.2-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libltc-1.1.2-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016677] Review Request: mathjax - JavaScript library to render math in the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016677 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mathjax-2.2-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mathjax-2.2-3.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016677] Review Request: mathjax - JavaScript library to render math in the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016677 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016677] Review Request: mathjax - JavaScript library to render math in the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016677 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mathjax-2.2-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mathjax-2.2-3.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821455] Review Request: python-trml2pdf12 - Tiny RML2PDF is a tool to easily create PDF documents without programming
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821455 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821455] Review Request: python-trml2pdf12 - Tiny RML2PDF is a tool to easily create PDF documents without programming
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821455 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-trml2pdf12-1.2-13.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-trml2pdf12-1.2-13.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995933] Re-Review Request: mlmmj - A simple and slim mailing list manager inspired by ezmlm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995933 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: mlmmj New Branches: f20 Owners: cicku -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005930] Review Request: noggit - JSON streaming parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005930 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- Thanks for review New Package SCM Request === Package Name: noggit Short Description: JSON streaming parser Owners: gil Branches: f19 f20 InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005930] Review Request: noggit - JSON streaming parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005930 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005930] Review Request: noggit - JSON streaming parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005930 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995933] Re-Review Request: mlmmj - A simple and slim mailing list manager inspired by ezmlm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995933 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016170] Review Request: ncdc - A modern and lightweight direct connect client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016170 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995933] Re-Review Request: mlmmj - A simple and slim mailing list manager inspired by ezmlm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995933 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016170] Review Request: ncdc - A modern and lightweight direct connect client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016170 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ncdc-1.18.1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ncdc-1.18.1-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1023619] Review Request: perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Callback - Send Log::Any logs to a subroutine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023619 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1023619] Review Request: perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Callback - Send Log::Any logs to a subroutine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023619 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Callback-0.06-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Callback-0.06-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1022584] Review Request: qpid-qmf - The QPID Management Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022584
--- Comment #6 from Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #5)
1. 10. Dist tag is missing.
Still missing.
Hrm, though I'd added it. Fixed (definitely) now.
2. Requires: qpid-cpp-client%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
Is this necessary?
Yes.
The dependency should be picked up automatically. Also,
it ties this package to qpid-cpp-client, when you said
that they should become independent.
No, I said that at the source code level the Qpid team is separating the QMF
codebase from the Qpid codebase; i.e., when a Qpid sources are released it's
not going to contain QMF code. We want the packages separate, even though QMF
will still have a dependency on what Qpid provides.
Rpmlint
---
Checking: qpid-qmf-0.24-11.fc21.x86_64.rpm
qpid-qmf-devel-0.24-11.fc21.x86_64.rpm
qpid-qmf-0.24-11.src.rpm
qpid-qmf.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalability
qpid-qmf.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary qmf-toolqpid-qmf-devel.x86_64:
W: no-documentation
qpid-qmf-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary qmf-gen
qpid-qmf.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalability
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
Mostly irrelevant, apart from the missing manpages.
I suggest using help2man to generate the missing manpages.
I'll update the Cmake in the upstream code and add manpages there.
Updated spec: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qpid-qmf.spec
Updated SRPM:
http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qpid-qmf-0.24-12.fc19.src.rpm
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6107331
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1023619] Review Request: perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Callback - Send Log::Any logs to a subroutine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023619 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Callback-0.06-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Callback-0.06-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005930] Review Request: noggit - JSON streaming parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005930 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- noggit-0.5-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/noggit-0.5-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005930] Review Request: noggit - JSON streaming parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005930 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005930] Review Request: noggit - JSON streaming parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005930 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- noggit-0.5-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/noggit-0.5-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016807] Review Request: tubo - Library to thread process std-in/std-err/std-out from fork() child
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016807 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- tubo-5.0.7-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tubo-5.0.7-2.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016807] Review Request: tubo - Library to thread process std-in/std-err/std-out from fork() child
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016807 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1024043] New: Review Request: python-arrow - Better dates and times for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024043 Bug ID: 1024043 Summary: Review Request: python-arrow - Better dates and times for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pin...@pingoured.fr QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org//python-arrow.spec SRPM URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org//python-arrow-0.4.1-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Arrow is a Python library that offers a sensible, human-friendly approach to creating, manipulating, formatting and converting dates, times, and timestamps. It implements and updates the datetime type, plugging gaps in functionality, and provides an intelligent module API that supports many common creation scenarios. Simply put, it helps you work with dates and times with fewer imports and a lot less code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1024043] Review Request: python-arrow - Better dates and times for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024043 --- Comment #1 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr --- This package built on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6107669 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016807] Review Request: tubo - Library to thread process std-in/std-err/std-out from fork() child
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016807 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- tubo-5.0.7-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tubo-5.0.7-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016807] Review Request: tubo - Library to thread process std-in/std-err/std-out from fork() child
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016807 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- tubo-5.0.7-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tubo-5.0.7-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 875087] Review Request: pbsclusterviz - Visualise the status of PBS clusters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087 --- Comment #8 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com --- First issue: error: %changelog not in descending chronological order -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1019435] Review Request: fluid - Library for fluid and dynamic applications development with QtQuick
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019435 Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|echevemas...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 875087] Review Request: pbsclusterviz - Visualise the status of PBS clusters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #9 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com --- Also doesn't build: RPM build errors: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pbsclusterviz-0.7a-py2.7.egg-info Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pbsclusterviz-0.7a-py2.7.egg-info You might want to take a look at the current Python packaging guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python although you're going to need to take care if you also want to support EPEL5 with the same spec file. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1021749] Review Request: php-symfony2 - PHP full-stack web framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021749
--- Comment #9 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
Quick notes
ln -s %{name}-common-%{version} %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}
This will not work on Fedora = 20
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 907688] Review Request: python-urllib3 - Python HTTP library with thread-safe connection pooling and file post
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907688 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-urllib3-1.5-7.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-urllib3-1.5-7.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885357] Review Request: OpenShadingLanguage - Shader language libraries and compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885357 Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net --- 404 not found -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016807] Review Request: tubo - Library to thread process std-in/std-err/std-out from fork() child
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016807 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- tubo-5.0.7-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016803] Review Request: rodent-icon-theme - SVG scalable icon theme by Rodent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016803 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cwick...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com --- I'd be fine just dropping rodent from xfce4-icon-theme in favor of this one... Adding Christoph to see what he thinks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1024043] Review Request: python-arrow - Better dates and times for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024043
Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||rb...@redhat.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rb...@redhat.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com ---
Pierre -- only one should issue. I know the tests are non-standard, but if
you could get them running in the spec file, that would be best.
Other than that -- *PACKAGE IS APPROVED*.
Package Review
==
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or generated. 9 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/threebean/1024043-python-arrow/licensecheck.txt
[-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
python3-arrow
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary
[Bug 1022255] Review Request: libltc - Linear/Longitudinal Time Code (LTC) Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022255 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- Package libltc-1.1.2-1.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing libltc-1.1.2-1.fc20' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-20094/libltc-1.1.2-1.fc20 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821455] Review Request: python-trml2pdf12 - Tiny RML2PDF is a tool to easily create PDF documents without programming
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821455 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-trml2pdf12-1.2-13.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005930] Review Request: noggit - JSON streaming parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005930 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- noggit-0.5-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016677] Review Request: mathjax - JavaScript library to render math in the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016677 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mathjax-2.2-3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016170] Review Request: ncdc - A modern and lightweight direct connect client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016170 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ncdc-1.18.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1023619] Review Request: perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Callback - Send Log::Any logs to a subroutine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023619 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Callback-0.06-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1024043] Review Request: python-arrow - Better dates and times for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024043 --- Comment #3 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr --- Thanks Ralph for the review, I will look at the unit-tests and see if I can activate them during the build (maybe I can figure something and push it upstream). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1024043] Review Request: python-arrow - Better dates and times for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024043 --- Comment #5 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-arrow Short Description: Better dates and time for Python Owners: pingou Branches: f19 f20 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1024043] Review Request: python-arrow - Better dates and times for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024043 --- Comment #4 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-arrow Short Description: Better dates and time for Python Owners: pingou Branches: F19 F20 EPEL6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1023848] Review Request: closure-compiler - JavaScript minifier and checker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023848 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1024114 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024114 [Bug 1024114] Review Request: json - JavaScript Object Notation support in Java -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
