[Bug 921304] Review Request: python-pecan - A lean WSGI object-dispatching web framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921304 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-01-27 03:23:03 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058195] New: Review Request: php-gitter - Object oriented interaction with Git repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058195 Bug ID: 1058195 Summary: Review Request: php-gitter - Object oriented interaction with Git repositories Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: shawn.iwin...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/siwinski/rpms/5ed64b05de1ef348df55ecb5621c33dddc6e6b9d/php-gitter.spec SRPM URL: http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/php-gitter-0.2.0-1.20131206git786e86a.fc20.src.rpm Description: Gitter allows you to interact in an object oriented manner with Git repositories via PHP. The main goal of the library is not to replace the system git command, but provide a coherent, stable and performatic object oriented interface. Most commands are sent to the system's git command, parsed and then interpreted by Gitter. Everything is transparent to you, so you don't have to worry about a thing. Fedora Account System Username: siwinski -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047510] Review Request: php-opencloud - PHP SDK for OpenStack/Rackspace APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047510 Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: php-opencloud Short Description: PHP SDK for OpenStack/Rackspace APIs Owners: brummbq Branches: f20 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058196] New: Review Request: php-goutte - A simple PHP web scraper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058196 Bug ID: 1058196 Summary: Review Request: php-goutte - A simple PHP web scraper Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: shawn.iwin...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/siwinski/rpms/16b086af367c53e92f63ca8c1af01784e71081ec/php-goutte.spec SRPM URL: http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/php-goutte-1.0.3-1.20140118gite83f8f9.fc20.src.rpm Description: Goutte is a screen scraping and web crawling library for PHP. Goutte provides a nice API to crawl websites and extract data from the HTML/XML responses. Fedora Account System Username: siwinski -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058174] Review Request: ghc-aeson-pretty - JSON pretty-printing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058174 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- This is also needed by pandoc-citeproce (to be submitted). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058196] Review Request: php-goutte - A simple PHP web scraper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058196 Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||php-goutte -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058195] Review Request: php-gitter - Object oriented interaction with Git repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058195 Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||php-gitter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058198] New: Review Request: ghc-rfc5051 - Simple unicode collation as per RFC5051
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058198 Bug ID: 1058198 Summary: Review Request: ghc-rfc5051 - Simple unicode collation as per RFC5051 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: peter...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-rfc5051.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-rfc5051-0.1.0.3-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: This library implements 'i;unicode-casemap', the simple, non locale-sensitive unicode collation algorithm described in RFC 5051 (http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5051.txt). Proper unicode collation can be done using text-icu, but that is a big dependency that depends on a large C library, and rfc5051 might be better for some purposes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058198] Review Request: ghc-rfc5051 - Simple unicode collation as per RFC5051
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058198 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- This package built on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6457315 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058198] Review Request: ghc-rfc5051 - Simple unicode collation as per RFC5051
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058198 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||haskell-devel@lists.fedorap ||roject.org Alias||ghc-rfc5051 Whiteboard||Ready --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- This is needed for pandoc-citeproc (to be submitted). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047510] Review Request: php-opencloud - PHP SDK for OpenStack/Rackspace APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047510 --- Comment #25 from Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de --- actually I think I forgot to add the proper obsoletes for php-cloudfiles. Well, I'll add this before import and retire cloudfiles afterwards. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048493] Review Request: icecat - GNU version of Firefox browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493 Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stran...@redhat.com --- Comment #12 from Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com --- There's a discussion about abandoning xulrunner. Official Firefox builds in Fedora are stand-alone builds now. So I guess the icecat package should not be based on xulrunner. Anyway, it may be also useful to check difference between Icecat and Firefox and ship just those ones. For instance, if the only changes are some extension, we can bundle them to an official Firefox package (say in icecat-extensions rpm) which would be much easier to maintain. But that's just a nit :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048493] Review Request: icecat - GNU version of Firefox browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493 --- Comment #13 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com --- Glenn Randers-Pehrson (the current 'libpng' maintainer) answered: Note that it's a one-line change to mozilla's configure.in to allow a non-apng supporting libpng to work. At line 3154 in today's Nightly, change AC_MSG_ERROR to AC_MSG_RESULT and you'll get the warning --with-system-png won't work because the system's libpng doesn't have APNG but configure will continue and build a non-APNG-supporting Firefox. If icecat's image/decoders/nsPNGDecoder.cpp is up-to-date with current mozilla-central it should work OK. If not, there was one place I had to add #ifdef PNG_APNG_SUPPORTED within the past couple of months. After that we can get rid of bundled libpng, at least. As for others (libtheora, libvorbis, libogg, libopus), I haven't checked yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1032479] Review Request: perl-Log-Report - Report a problem with exceptions and translation support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032479 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1032479] Review Request: perl-Log-Report - Report a problem with exceptions and translation support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032479 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Log-Report Short Description: Report a problem with exceptions and translation support Owners: ppisar jplesnik psabata Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049551] Review Request: jpegoptim - Utility to optimize JPEG files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049551 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|jpegoptim-1.3.0-1.fc20 |jpegoptim-1.3.0-1.el5 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- jpegoptim-1.3.0-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049551] Review Request: jpegoptim - Utility to optimize JPEG files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049551 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|jpegoptim-1.3.0-1.el5 |jpegoptim-1.3.0-1.el6 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- jpegoptim-1.3.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883104] Review Request: idle3-tools - Manipulate the value of the idle3 timer found on recent WD Hard Disk Drives
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883104 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|idle3-tools-0.9.1-1.fc20|idle3-tools-0.9.1-1.el6 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- idle3-tools-0.9.1-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058088] Review Request: mingw-opus - Audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058088 Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||manisan...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|manisan...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com --- Taking for review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051771] Review Request: vdr-tvguide - a highly customizable 2D EPG viewer plugin for the VDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051771
--- Comment #8 from Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com ---
Hello,
some comments:
- it looks like the package doesn't build on F20 and Rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6457561 (rawhide)
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6457430 (F20)
You try to build vdr-tvguide against graphicsmagick:
make CFLAGS=%{optflags} IMAGELIB=graphicsmagick %{?_smp_mflags} all
whereas your package depends on ImageMagick-c++-devel. As a result, drop
IMAGELIB=... to link against ImageMagick (this seems to be the default), or
replace your BR on ImageMagick-c++-devel by GraphicsMagick-c++-devel if you
have a reason to use GraphicsMagick instead.
- since the package is written in C++, and since the CXXFLAGS variable is
handled by the plugin Makefile, you must also set CXXFLAGS when calling make,
to keep consistency on build flags:
make CFLAGS=%{optflags} CXXFLAGS=%{optflags} ...
You should even add -fPIC to both CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS to handle build issues
on x86_64 platforms.
- a stable release 1.0.0 is available. Why do you need to use a development
snapshot?
- I wonder if a subpackage for themes is really necessary:
* the data subpackage is not very heavy
* the subpackage is useless standalone
* I don't think the data subpackage would be required by any other package
than vdr-tvguide.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058088] Review Request: mingw-opus - Audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058088
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
Full review below. Issues:
[!]: Changelog in prescribed format - there is a typo:
* Initial package
should be
- Initial package
Everything else is ok, approved! (Just remember to fix the changelog issue
before importing).
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
BSD (2 clause), GPL (v2 or later), Unknown or generated. 5 files
have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/sandro/.Data/Desktop/1058088-mingw-opus/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[!]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
mingw32-opus , mingw64-opus
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
Note: mingw64-opus : /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-
root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/opus.pc mingw32-opus : /usr/i686-w64-mingw32
/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/opus.pc
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported
[Bug 999959] Review Request: zmap - Network scanner for Internet-wide network studies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=59 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #29 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: zmap New Branches: el6 epel7 Owners: cicku -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1034492] Review Request: asciinema - Record and upload terminal sessions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034492 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jedelsky jakub.jedel...@gmail.com --- SPEC: https://gist.github.com/jakubjedelsky/7654715 SRPM: http://s.stderr.cz/rpm/asciinema-0.9.7-3.fc20.src.rpm %clean section, CFLAGS and python2-devel as BR was added earlier. Changes: removed python_sitelib for EPEL5 removed %defattr in %files section added ncurses as required package added %check section - need a patch for non-interative shell - need some BRs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1030751] Review Request: python-bbcode - A pure python bbcode parser and formatter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030751 --- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net --- Great! [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.3/site- packages/__pycache__(python3-setuptools, python3-libs) What this item on the list means is: The fedora-review tool found directories in the package, which are owned by other packages already. That refers to the following part of the guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_also_owned_by_a_package_implementing_required_functionality_of_your_package -- Owns it's own files in cited directories, It should _not_ own /usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/__pycache__ because that one belongs into python3-libs already. Co-ownership of directories can become a problem, if one package messes up the file access permissions, for example. That's why the guidelines still try to reduce co-ownership to the exceptional cases: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your_package_to_function [...] Not related to the Review Guidelines, but to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Examples_of_good_package_summaries Summary:A pure python bbcode parser and formatter My alternative suggestion that also eliminates the lower-case spelling of everything: Summary: BBCode parser and formatter written in Python -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051771] Review Request: vdr-tvguide - a highly customizable 2D EPG viewer plugin for the VDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051771 --- Comment #9 from Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com --- - The license tag should be set to GPLv2+ also (see COPYING file and license headers refering to GPLv2 or later in source files). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1022551] Review Request: bouncycastle-pkix - CMS, PKCS, EAC, TSP, CMP, CRMF, OCSP for Bouncy Castle
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022551 --- Comment #4 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com --- Hi Mattias, Thank you for picking this gem for a review. I originally needed this package due to JRuby update. However, I am currently busy with other stuff, so if it can wait ... or I am fain if anybody else is willing to finish the submission instead of me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1034492] Review Request: asciinema - Record and upload terminal sessions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034492 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org --- Ok, package look good, I think I can declare it approved. I have sponsored you in the packager group, so you can proceed according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process If you wish, you should send a email to fedora-devel to present yourself, and if you have any questions regarding Fedora or the packaging, do not hesitate to contact me over email or irc. And welcome to the team :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058280] New: Review Request: lmiwbem - Python WBEM Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058280 Bug ID: 1058280 Summary: Review Request: lmiwbem - Python WBEM Client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: phat...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://phatina.fedorapeople.org/rpms/lmiwbem.spec SRPM URL: http://phatina.fedorapeople.org/rpms/lmiwbem-0.1.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: LMIWBEM is a Python library, which performs CIM operations using CIM-XML protocol. The library tries to mimic PyWBEM. Fedora Account System Username: phatina -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1010557] Review Request: numix-themes - Numix themes for Gnome, Xfce and Openbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010557 --- Comment #17 from Satyajit Sahoo satyajit.ha...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #16) This is an unofficial review. Hopefully, you will find a sponsor soon who can do a formal review. One question I have about the spec file is - * If they are separate packages without depending on each other in this case, why is there a requires? Requires: numix-openbox-theme Requires: numix-xfwm4-theme Shouldn't all these packages only require numix-common since that is package containing common files for the theme? When a user installs the numix-themes package, he expects to have all the themes installed. A GTK3 theme is incomplete without a matching GTK2 theme, a GTK theme in incomplete without a matching WM theme (metacity, xfwm or openbox) etc. Hence the Requires. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1045556] Review Request: hbase - The Apache Hadoop database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045556 --- Comment #16 from Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com --- I disabled the tests for 2 reasons. 1) They took quite some time to run through, and 2) they were unstable. In my local testing, the suite never ran through to completion and the failure case would eventually result in the build hanging for forever as far as I could tell. I know I waited upwards of 30 minutes in one of the hang cases and it never timed out or completed. The tests also seemed to impact each other even previous ones passed. When running the suite locally tests would start failing with odd errors when all the tests were run together, but if the test was run separately or even if the module was run separately then everything would pass. It may be possible to come up with a way to run the tests that would be less unstable, but the test suite did not give me confidence it could be run consistently with useful results. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058280] Review Request: lmiwbem - Python WBEM Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058280 Peter Hatina phat...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1045556] Review Request: hbase - The Apache Hadoop database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045556 --- Comment #17 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com --- Since hbase tests are unstable, i think that no one will require you to enable them. Please consider adding a build conditional but i won't make it a blocker. So, i confirm that the review is approved, please continue with scm request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058038] Review Request: systeminfo - simple utility for viewing HW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058038 --- Comment #3 from pavol.ip...@gmail.com --- Hi, wow, i didn't expect so many things to fix :). I will look at them. Hmm interesting is why it didn't work for you on Fedora 20, i tested it on rhel 5.8-6.3, centos-6.5, fedora 20, ubuntu 12.04, i will check it. I already have HTML docs generated but i didn't package it yet. Thanks for reviewing :). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 470737] Review Request: pen - Load balancer for simple tcp based protocols such as http or smtp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470737 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 470737] Review Request: pen - Load balancer for simple tcp based protocols such as http or smtp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470737 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820452] Review Request: mediawiki119 - updated mediawiki for EPEL-6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820452 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820452] Review Request: mediawiki119 - updated mediawiki for EPEL-6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820452 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874677] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Rpc - Horde RPC API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874677 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874677] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Rpc - Horde RPC API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874677 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 895880] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Share - Horde Shared Permissions System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895880 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1002155] Review Request: simple-xml - An XML serialization framework for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002155 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||simple-xml-2.7.1-2.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-01-27 08:04:31 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- simple-xml-2.7.1-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 908329] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Core - Horde Core Framework libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908329 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1002163] Review Request: attributes-binder - Attribute binder and meta-data annotation preprocessor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002163 Bug 1002163 depends on bug 1002155, which changed state. Bug 1002155 Summary: Review Request: simple-xml - An XML serialization framework for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002155 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051771] Review Request: vdr-tvguide - a highly customizable 2D EPG viewer plugin for the VDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051771
--- Comment #10 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to Mohamed El Morabity from comment #8)
Hello,
some comments:
- it looks like the package doesn't build on F20 and Rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6457561 (rawhide)
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6457430 (F20)
You try to build vdr-tvguide against graphicsmagick:
make CFLAGS=%{optflags} IMAGELIB=graphicsmagick %{?_smp_mflags} all
whereas your package depends on ImageMagick-c++-devel. As a result, drop
IMAGELIB=... to link against ImageMagick (this seems to be the default),
or replace your BR on ImageMagick-c++-devel by GraphicsMagick-c++-devel if
you have a reason to use GraphicsMagick instead.
I replaced ImageMagick as requirement due big dependencies through
GraphicsMagick
- since the package is written in C++, and since the CXXFLAGS variable is
handled by the plugin Makefile, you must also set CXXFLAGS when calling
make, to keep consistency on build flags:
make CFLAGS=%{optflags} CXXFLAGS=%{optflags} ...
You should even add -fPIC to both CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS to handle build
issues on x86_64 platforms.
done
- a stable release 1.0.0 is available. Why do you need to use a development
snapshot?
because it is the current version and includes all necessary patches and more
features.
- I wonder if a subpackage for themes is really necessary:
* the data subpackage is not very heavy
* the subpackage is useless standalone
* I don't think the data subpackage would be required by any other package
than vdr-tvguide.
removed the data subpackage
- The license tag should be set to GPLv2+ also (see COPYING file and license
- headers refering to GPLv2 or later in source files).
done
Spec URL: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/d1u3vl780ovey8s/vdr-tvguide.spec
SRPM URL:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/qt4uo8ej1tcvzdl/vdr-tvguide-1.0.0-10.20140126git5eabb6e.fc20.src.rpm
%changelog
* Mon Jan 27 2014 Martin Gansser marti...@fedoraproject.org -
1.0.0-10.20140126git5eabb6e
- rebuild for new git release
- added correct license tag
- removed data subpackage
- removed ImageMagick-c++-devel package
- added GraphicsMagick-c++-devel package
- added CXXFLAGS and -fPIC build flag
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 960041] Review Request: lfcxml - Lemke Foundation Classes XML extension
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960041 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 895880] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Share - Horde Shared Permissions System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895880 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 977017] Review Request: dozer - Java Bean to Java Bean mapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977017 Bug 977017 depends on bug 977016, which changed state. Bug 977016 Summary: Review Request: xmlbeans-maven-plugin - Maven XML Beans Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977016 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1002157] Review Request: randomizedtesting - Java Testing Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002157 Bug 1002157 depends on bug 1002155, which changed state. Bug 1002155 Summary: Review Request: simple-xml - An XML serialization framework for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002155 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005792] Review Request: uima-addons - Apache UIMA Addons components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005792 Bug 1005792 depends on bug 977016, which changed state. Bug 977016 Summary: Review Request: xmlbeans-maven-plugin - Maven XML Beans Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977016 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 960851] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Dav - Horde library for WebDAV, CalDAV, CardDAV
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960851 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051836] Review Request: mingw-flac - Encoder/decoder for the Free Lossless Audio Codec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051836 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mingw-flac-1.3.0-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 960041] Review Request: lfcxml - Lemke Foundation Classes XML extension
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960041 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 908329] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Core - Horde Core Framework libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908329 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 960851] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Dav - Horde library for WebDAV, CalDAV, CardDAV
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960851 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1019403] Review Request: gst-editing-services - Gstreamer editing services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019403 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||gst-editing-services-1.1.90 ||-5.fc20.20140123git105d901 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-01-27 08:08:17 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- gst-editing-services-1.1.90-5.fc20.20140123git105d901, pitivi-0.92-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1011873] Review Request: ghc-byteable - Type class for sequence of bytes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011873 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||ghc-byteable-0.1.1-2.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-01-27 08:07:30 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-byteable-0.1.1-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016887] Review Request: mingw-c-ares - A library for asynchronous DNS operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016887 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||mingw-c-ares-1.10.0-2.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-01-27 08:07:38 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mingw-c-ares-1.10.0-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 --- Comment #28 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055393] Review Request: ocaml-biniou - Safe and fast binary data format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055393 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ocaml-biniou-1.0.9-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 977016] Review Request: xmlbeans-maven-plugin - Maven XML Beans Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977016 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||xmlbeans-maven-plugin-2.3.3 ||-1.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-01-27 08:06:21 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- xmlbeans-maven-plugin-2.3.3-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 987731] Review Request: qt4pas - Free Pascal Qt4 Binding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987731 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 987731] Review Request: qt4pas - Free Pascal Qt4 Binding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987731 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1016887] Review Request: mingw-c-ares - A library for asynchronous DNS operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016887 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mingw-c-ares-1.10.0-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 962189] Review Request: cego - A relational and transactional database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962189 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 999959] Review Request: zmap - Network scanner for Internet-wide network studies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=59 --- Comment #30 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 999959] Review Request: zmap - Network scanner for Internet-wide network studies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=59 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1056460] Review Request: ssdeep - Compute context triggered piecewise hashes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056460 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||ssdeep-2.10-2.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-01-27 08:08:38 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ssdeep-2.10-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1025601] Review Request: python-pypump - Python Pump.io library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025601 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051836] Review Request: mingw-flac - Encoder/decoder for the Free Lossless Audio Codec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051836 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||mingw-flac-1.3.0-1.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-01-27 08:10:55 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mingw-flac-1.3.0-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1011873] Review Request: ghc-byteable - Type class for sequence of bytes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011873 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ghc-byteable-0.1.1-2.fc19 |ghc-byteable-0.1.1-2.fc20 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-byteable-0.1.1-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1029002] Review Request: pcllib - Portable Coroutine Library (PCL)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029002 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1029002] Review Request: pcllib - Portable Coroutine Library (PCL)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029002 --- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1025601] Review Request: python-pypump - Python Pump.io library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025601 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1032479] Review Request: perl-Log-Report - Report a problem with exceptions and translation support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032479 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1032479] Review Request: perl-Log-Report - Report a problem with exceptions and translation support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032479 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 970423] Review Request: mingw-libsndfile - Library for reading and writing sound files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970423 Bug 970423 depends on bug 1051836, which changed state. Bug 1051836 Summary: Review Request: mingw-flac - Encoder/decoder for the Free Lossless Audio Codec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051836 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047510] Review Request: php-opencloud - PHP SDK for OpenStack/Rackspace APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047510 --- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047510] Review Request: php-opencloud - PHP SDK for OpenStack/Rackspace APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047510 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051372] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Form - Horde Form API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051372 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051372] Review Request: php-horde-Horde-Form - Horde Form API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051372 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051753] Review Request: drupal7-webform - Webform is the module for making surveys in Drupal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051753 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051753] Review Request: drupal7-webform - Webform is the module for making surveys in Drupal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051753 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1056435] Review Request: python-nose-parameterized - Decorator for parameterized testing with Nose
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056435 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1054830] Review Request: perl-Text-Haml - Haml Perl implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054830 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1056435] Review Request: python-nose-parameterized - Decorator for parameterized testing with Nose
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056435 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1054830] Review Request: perl-Text-Haml - Haml Perl implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054830 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058068] Review Request: nodejs-chai-connect-middleware - Helpers for testing Connect middleware with Chai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058068 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058068] Review Request: nodejs-chai-connect-middleware - Helpers for testing Connect middleware with Chai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058068 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058069] Review Request: nodejs-proxyquire - Proxies Node.js require to allow overriding dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058069 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058069] Review Request: nodejs-proxyquire - Proxies Node.js require to allow overriding dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058069 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058094] SCM Request: sylpheed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058094 --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058094] SCM Request: sylpheed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058094 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058280] Review Request: lmiwbem - Python WBEM Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058280 Tomas Smetana tsmet...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tsmet...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Tomas Smetana tsmet...@redhat.com --- I'll review the package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 977016] Review Request: xmlbeans-maven-plugin - Maven XML Beans Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977016 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058280] Review Request: lmiwbem - Python WBEM Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058280 Tomas Smetana tsmet...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1030751] Review Request: python-bbcode - A pure python bbcode parser and formatter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030751
Pete Travis m...@petetravis.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |
--- Comment #11 from Pete Travis m...@petetravis.com ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #10)
Great!
Thanks, Michael. I appreciate you taking the time to help me understand this.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.3/site-
packages/__pycache__(python3-setuptools, python3-libs)
What this item on the list means is: The fedora-review tool found
directories in the package, which are owned by other packages already. That
refers to the following part of the guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:
Guidelines#The_directory_is_also_owned_by_a_package_implementing_required_fun
ctionality_of_your_package
-- Owns it's own files in cited directories,
It should _not_ own /usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/__pycache__ because
that one belongs into python3-libs already.
Co-ownership of directories can become a problem, if one package messes up
the file access permissions, for example. That's why the guidelines still
try to reduce co-ownership to the exceptional cases:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:
Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your
_package_to_function
My thinking here was that the __pycache__ directory wasn't present in the
source tarball, and was claimed via the %{python3_sitelib}/* glob, so it was
a result of the build process and safe to glob, similar to the py2 glob that
didn't throw a warning or even pyc,pyo files that aren't shipped but generated.
I'll read up on this, and certainly remember it.
Christopher, please adjust for this.
[...]
Not related to the Review Guidelines, but to:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Examples_of_good_package_summaries
Summary:A pure python bbcode parser and formatter
My alternative suggestion that also eliminates the lower-case spelling of
everything:
Summary: BBCode parser and formatter written in Python
I prefer your suggestion too, but the existing summary matches upstream.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1009446] Review Request: open-mtools - Tools for testing IP multicast
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009446 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- - license breakdown should be documented Done. Updated package is on the same URL. - license text should be shipped with the tarball, can you contact upstream ? License is shipped with the archive. See README.txt: These tools are offered to the general public for any use without license. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED AS IS AND INFORMATICA DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. INFORMATICA DOES NOT WARRANT THAT USE OF THE SOFTWARE WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR-FREE. INFORMATICA SHALL NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, BE LIABLE TO LICENSEE FOR LOST PROFITS, CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL OR INDIRECT DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREUNDER, EVEN IF INFORMATICA HAS BEEN APPRISED OF THE LIKELIHOOD OF SUCH DAMAGES. Other respective license texts (BSD) are quoted in each respective file. - I do not see where is the gpl v3 code in the License tag Sorry. I had my own Makefile under GPLv3, but took it away, and forgot to remove the license name from the spec file. Also fixed. in fact, the tarball do not correspond to the files on svn, where there is udp.c in gpl v3. LGPLv2+. However I do not package the upstream development tree. I package released ZIP archive which does not contain the file yet. Is it acceptable? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1045556] Review Request: hbase - The Apache Hadoop database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045556 Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: hbase Short Description: The Apache Hadoop database Owners: rrati Branches: InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 949214] Review Request: python-iptools - A few useful functions and objects for manipulating ip addresses in python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949214 Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-01-27 08:57:35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 949371] Review Request: StarCluster - Tool for managing computing clusters hosted on Amazon's EC2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949371 Bug 949371 depends on bug 949214, which changed state. Bug 949214 Summary: Review Request: python-iptools - A few useful functions and objects for manipulating ip addresses in python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949214 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
