[Bug 1076192] Review Request: python-bitmath - Aids representing and manipulating sizes in various prefix notations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076192 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-bitmath-1.0.4-1.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-03-24 02:37:56 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-bitmath-1.0.4-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076863] Review Request: cmockery2 - Lightweight C unit testing framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076863 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- cmockery2-1.3.6-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069934] Review Request: python-pytest-flakes - pytest plugin to check source code with pyflakes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069934 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com --- Looks good now. Thanks. APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1056235] Review Request: nfspy - An ID-spoofing NFS client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056235 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||nfspy-1.0-2.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-03-24 02:39:37 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nfspy-1.0-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894600] Review Request: coin-or-cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894600 Bug 894600 depends on bug 894586, which changed state. Bug 894586 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Osi - COIN-OR Open Solver Interface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894606] Review Request: coin-or-Couenne -Couenne, an exact solver for nonconvex MINLPs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894606 Bug 894606 depends on bug 894586, which changed state. Bug 894586 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Osi - COIN-OR Open Solver Interface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894608] Review Request: coin-or-SYMPHONY - Solver for mixed-integer linear programs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894608 Bug 894608 depends on bug 894586, which changed state. Bug 894586 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Osi - COIN-OR Open Solver Interface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894599] Review Request: coin-or-CoinMP - C-API interface to CLP, CBC and CGL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894599 Bug 894599 depends on bug 894586, which changed state. Bug 894586 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Osi - COIN-OR Open Solver Interface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894588] Review Request: coin-or-Cgl - Cut Generation Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894588 Bug 894588 depends on bug 894586, which changed state. Bug 894586 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Osi - COIN-OR Open Solver Interface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894602] Review Request: coin-or-Dip - Decomposition for Integer Programming
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894602 Bug 894602 depends on bug 894586, which changed state. Bug 894586 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Osi - COIN-OR Open Solver Interface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894591] Review Request: coin-or-Bcps - Part of the COIN High Performance Parallel Search Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894591 Bug 894591 depends on bug 894586, which changed state. Bug 894586 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Osi - COIN-OR Open Solver Interface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894597] Review Request: coin-or-Cbc - Coin-or branch and cut
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894597 Bug 894597 depends on bug 894586, which changed state. Bug 894586 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Osi - COIN-OR Open Solver Interface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894598] Review Request: coin-or-DyLP - Implementation of the dynamic simplex algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894598 Bug 894598 depends on bug 894586, which changed state. Bug 894586 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Osi - COIN-OR Open Solver Interface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894609] Review Request: coin-or-OS - Optimization Services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894609 Bug 894609 depends on bug 894586, which changed state. Bug 894586 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Osi - COIN-OR Open Solver Interface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894596] Review Request: coin-or-Blis - BLIS (BiCePS Linear Integer Solver)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894596 Bug 894596 depends on bug 894586, which changed state. Bug 894586 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Osi - COIN-OR Open Solver Interface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894593] Review Request: coin-or-Vol - Vol (Volume Algorithm)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894593 Bug 894593 depends on bug 894586, which changed state. Bug 894586 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Osi - COIN-OR Open Solver Interface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894605] Review Request: coin-or-Bonmin - Basic Open-source Nonlinear Mixed INteger programming
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894605 Bug 894605 depends on bug 894586, which changed state. Bug 894586 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Osi - COIN-OR Open Solver Interface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894587] Review Request: coin-or-Clp - Coin-or linear programming
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894587 Bug 894587 depends on bug 894586, which changed state. Bug 894586 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Osi - COIN-OR Open Solver Interface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894589] Review Request: coin-or-Alps - COIN-OR High-Performance Parallel Search Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894589 Bug 894589 depends on bug 894586, which changed state. Bug 894586 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Osi - COIN-OR Open Solver Interface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894586] Review Request: coin-or-Osi - COIN-OR Open Solver Interface Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||coin-or-Osi-0.106.2-3.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-03-24 02:40:00 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- coin-or-Osi-0.106.2-3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894594] Review Request: coin-or-Bcp - Branch-Cut-Price Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894594 Bug 894594 depends on bug 894586, which changed state. Bug 894586 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Osi - COIN-OR Open Solver Interface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894603] Review Request: coin-or-FlopC++ - Algebraic modelling language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894603 Bug 894603 depends on bug 894586, which changed state. Bug 894586 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Osi - COIN-OR Open Solver Interface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076192] Review Request: python-bitmath - Aids representing and manipulating sizes in various prefix notations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076192 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-bitmath-1.0.4-1.fc19 |python-bitmath-1.0.4-1.fc20 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-bitmath-1.0.4-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 977124] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-contrib-nodeunit - Run Nodeunit unit tests with grunt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977124 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||nodejs-grunt-contrib-nodeun ||it-0.3.2-1.fc19 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-grunt-contrib-nodeunit-0.3.2-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 977124] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-contrib-nodeunit - Run Nodeunit unit tests with grunt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977124 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nodejs-grunt-contrib-nodeun |nodejs-grunt-contrib-nodeun |it-0.3.2-1.fc19 |it-0.3.2-1.fc20 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-grunt-contrib-nodeunit-0.3.2-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1056235] Review Request: nfspy - An ID-spoofing NFS client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056235 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nfspy-1.0-2.fc19|nfspy-1.0-2.fc20 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nfspy-1.0-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069629] Review Request: jenkins-executable-war - Jenkins Executable War
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069629 Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Michal Srb m...@redhat.com --- Thanks! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jenkins-executable-war Short Description: Jenkins Executable War Owners: msrb sochotni mizdebsk msimacek Branches: InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079733] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Redirect - Redirect for Catalyst used easily is offered
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079733 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de --- Package is basically OK, but a missing BR: perl(strict). i.e. please add BuildRequires: perl(strict) Besides this, similar remarks wrt. rhel as with your other packages also apply here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1075598] Review Request: ghc-contravariant - Contravariant functors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075598 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Just for other people: this is needed for lens - trifecta - idris. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069709] Review Request: jenkins-mailer-plugin - Jenkins Mailer Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069709 Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Fixed In Version||jenkins-mailer-plugin-1.8-1 ||.fc21 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-03-24 03:19:11 --- Comment #6 from Michal Srb m...@redhat.com --- Fixed in jenkins-mailer-plugin-1.8-1.fc21. Closing. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069702] Review Request: jenkins-ssh-credentials-plugin - Jenkins SSH Credentials Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069702 Bug 1069702 depends on bug 1069617, which changed state. Bug 1069617 Summary: Review Request: jenkins-credentials-plugin - Jenkins Credentials Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069617 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069617] Review Request: jenkins-credentials-plugin - Jenkins Credentials Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069617 Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Fixed In Version||jenkins-credentials-plugin- ||1.10-1.fc21 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-03-24 03:20:26 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1075598] Review Request: ghc-contravariant - Contravariant functors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075598 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Created attachment 877946 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=877946action=edit contravariant-0.4.4-without-transformers-compat.patch Just for the record, this simple patch would allow avoiding the dependency on the backwards compat library transformers-compat. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069614] Review Request: jenkins-ssh-cli-auth - Jenkins SSH CLI client authenticator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069614 --- Comment #3 from Michal Srb m...@redhat.com --- Updated version: Spec URL: http://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/2/jenkins-ssh-cli-auth.spec SRPM URL: http://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/2/jenkins-ssh-cli-auth-1.2-2.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079745] Review Request: perl-Excel-Template - Create Excel files from templates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079745 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de --- * These Requires: should be removed from the *.spec: Requires: perl(XML::Parser) Requires: perl(IO::Scalar) Requires: perl(File::Basename) Requires: perl(Spreadsheet::WriteExcel::Utility) Rpm automatically detects them, causing the manually specified ones to appear twice on the resulting binary rpms. * BuildRequires: perl(Spreadsheet::WriteExcel) should match the run-time requirement: Requires: perl(Spreadsheet::WriteExcel) = 0.42 i.e. change BuildRequires: perl(Spreadsheet::WriteExcel) into BuildRequires: perl(Spreadsheet::WriteExcel) = 0.42 * I'd recommend to chmods the source-files in %build (Fix the sources) instead to chmod them after installation in %install (Workaround the bug). * The package ships a LICENCE file = MUST add LICENCE to %doc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079733] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Redirect - Redirect for Catalyst used easily is offered
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079733 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079890] New: Review Request: perl-REST-Client - A simple client for interacting with RESTful http/https resources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079890 Bug ID: 1079890 Summary: Review Request: perl-REST-Client - A simple client for interacting with RESTful http/https resources Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dd...@cpan.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://ddick.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-REST-Client.spec SRPM URL: http://ddick.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-REST-Client-271-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: A simple client for interacting with RESTful http/https resources Fedora Account System Username: ddick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079890] Review Request: perl-REST-Client - A simple client for interacting with RESTful http/https resources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079890 --- Comment #1 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org --- koji build at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=926 and for EPEL6 at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=906 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076739] Review Request: ghc-scientific - Arbitrary-precision floating-point numbers represented using scientific notation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076739 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1076739] Review Request: ghc-scientific - Arbitrary-precision floating-point numbers represented using scientific notation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076739 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Needed by quite a few important packages: http://packdeps.haskellers.com/reverse/scientific -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1036755] Review Request: python-httpretty - HTTP client mock for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036755 --- Comment #21 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com --- Dridi, do you still want to do the review, or should I do it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1075569] Review Request: ghc-ansi-wl-pprint - The Wadler/Leijen Pretty Printer for colored ANSI terminal output
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075569 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1019215] Review Request: ghc-network-enumerator - Enumerators for network sockets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019215 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |DEFERRED Last Closed||2014-03-24 06:10:11 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Closing this for now: retired from Rawhide - more later. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1075595] Review Request: ghc-transformers-compat - A compatibility shim exposing the new types from transformers 0.3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075595 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #1) However I think (untested;) it should be trivial to patch contravariant, distributive, exceptions, etc to depend on transformers instead of this compat package. For reference I attached a sample patch to bug 1075598 showing how we could do this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079928] New: Review Request: dvblinkremote - Tool for interacting with a DVBLink Connect! Server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079928 Bug ID: 1079928 Summary: Review Request: dvblinkremote - Tool for interacting with a DVBLink Connect! Server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pikachu.2...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/dvblinkremote/dvblinkremote.spec SRPM URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/dvblinkremote/dvblinkremote-0.2.0-0.1.beta.fc20.src.rpm Description: A command line tool for interacting with a DVBLink Connect! Server using the DVBLink Remote API. Fedora Account System Username: melmorabity -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 887821] Review Request: nagios-plugins-bonding - Nagios plugin to monitor Linux bonding interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887821 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 887821] Review Request: nagios-plugins-bonding - Nagios plugin to monitor Linux bonding interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887821 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1020839] Review Request: fedora-gooey-karma - GUI tool for adding karma to Bodhi system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1020839] Review Request: fedora-gooey-karma - GUI tool for adding karma to Bodhi system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839 --- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069629] Review Request: jenkins-executable-war - Jenkins Executable War
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069629 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069629] Review Request: jenkins-executable-war - Jenkins Executable War
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069629 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1074267] Review Request: t-prot - A filter which improves the readability of email messages and Usenet posts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074267 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1074267] Review Request: t-prot - A filter which improves the readability of email messages and Usenet posts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074267 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079617] Review Request: perl-Type-Tiny - Tiny, yet Moo(se)-compatible type constraint
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079617 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079617] Review Request: perl-Type-Tiny - Tiny, yet Moo(se)-compatible type constraint
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079617 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079661] Review Request: cinnamon-menus - A menu system for the Cinnamon project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079661 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079661] Review Request: cinnamon-menus - A menu system for the Cinnamon project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079661 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079960] New: Review Request: eclipse-m2e-sourcelookup - M2E Sources Lookup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079960 Bug ID: 1079960 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-m2e-sourcelookup - M2E Sources Lookup Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mizde...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Spec URL: http://mizdebsk.fedorapeople.org/review/eclipse-m2e-sourcelookup/eclipse-m2e-sourcelookup.spec SRPM URL: http://mizdebsk.fedorapeople.org/review/eclipse-m2e-sourcelookup/eclipse-m2e-sourcelookup-1.1.0.201401182304-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Allows Eclipse Java debugger lookup sources of Java classes dynamically loaded by Maven, such as Maven plugins. Supports multiple versions of the same class loaded by the Maven VM. Sources are looked up among Eclipse workspace projects or resolved from Maven repositories as necessary. Fedora Account System Username: mizdebsk Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079961] New: Review Request: eclipse-m2e-mavendev - Maven Development Tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079961 Bug ID: 1079961 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-m2e-mavendev - Maven Development Tools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mizde...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Spec URL: http://mizdebsk.fedorapeople.org/review/eclipse-m2e-mavendev/eclipse-m2e-mavendev.spec SRPM URL: http://mizdebsk.fedorapeople.org/review/eclipse-m2e-mavendev/eclipse-m2e-mavendev-0.2.0.201311250404-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Maven Development Tools is a collection of m2e extensions that enables end-to-end debugging of Maven Plugins, Maven Core and their dependencies from m2e development workspace, without the need to install artifacts to the local Maven repository. Fedora Account System Username: mizdebsk Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079960] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-sourcelookup - M2E Sources Lookup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079960 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1079961 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079961 [Bug 1079961] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-mavendev - Maven Development Tools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079961] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-mavendev - Maven Development Tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079961 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1079960 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079960 [Bug 1079960] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-sourcelookup - M2E Sources Lookup -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079965] New: Review Request: python-dpath - python library for searching dictionaries using XPath-like expressions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079965 Bug ID: 1079965 Summary: Review Request: python-dpath - python library for searching dictionaries using XPath-like expressions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: socho...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-dpath.spec SRPM URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-dpath-1.2-0.1.52.20140319gita6ce774d.fc21.src.rpm Description: A python library for accessing and searching dictionaries via /slashed/paths ala xpath Basically it lets you glob over a dictionary as if it were a filesystem. It allows you to specify globs (ala the bash eglob syntax, through some advanced fnmatch.fnmatch magic) to access dictionary elements, and provides some facility for filtering those results. Fedora Account System Username:sochotni -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079965] Review Request: python-dpath - python library for searching dictionaries using XPath-like expressions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079965 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1079967 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079967 [Bug 1079967] Review Request: fedwatch - Tool for watching fedmsg messages and running arbitrary scripts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079967] Review Request: fedwatch - Tool for watching fedmsg messages and running arbitrary scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079967 Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1079965 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079965 [Bug 1079965] Review Request: python-dpath - python library for searching dictionaries using XPath-like expressions -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079967] New: Review Request: fedwatch - Tool for watching fedmsg messages and running arbitrary scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079967 Bug ID: 1079967 Summary: Review Request: fedwatch - Tool for watching fedmsg messages and running arbitrary scripts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: socho...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/fedwatch.spec SRPM URL: http://sochotni.fedorapeople.org/packages/fedwatch-0.3-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Tool and library for watching fedmsg messages and running arbitrary scripts in a nice way. Think of fedwatch as simple converter from fedmsg json messages into shell arguments for scripts. Fedora Account System Username: sochotni current version is also available on copr: http://copr-fe.cloud.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sochotni/fedwatch/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069614] Review Request: jenkins-ssh-cli-auth - Jenkins SSH CLI client authenticator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069614 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069614] Review Request: jenkins-ssh-cli-auth - Jenkins SSH CLI client authenticator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069614
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- This seems like a Java package, please install fedora-review-plugin-java to
get additional checks
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or generated. 3 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/gil/1069614-jenkins-ssh-cli-auth/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in jenkins-
ssh-cli-auth-javadoc
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in
[Bug 1079960] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-sourcelookup - M2E Sources Lookup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079960 --- Comment #1 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6667330 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069614] Review Request: jenkins-ssh-cli-auth - Jenkins SSH CLI client authenticator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069614 --- Comment #5 from Michal Srb m...@redhat.com --- [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached diff). See: (this test has no URL) Oops, fixed: Spec URL: http://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/3/jenkins-ssh-cli-auth.spec SRPM URL: http://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/3/jenkins-ssh-cli-auth-1.2-2.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1036755] Review Request: python-httpretty - HTTP client mock for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036755 --- Comment #22 from Dridi Boukelmoune dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #21) Dridi, do you still want to do the review, or should I do it? I don't have time for this today, but it should be ok within the week. I'll gladly do the review since most of it has already been done, unless my latency is too high for you :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069614] Review Request: jenkins-ssh-cli-auth - Jenkins SSH CLI client authenticator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069614 Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Michal Srb m...@redhat.com --- Thanks! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jenkins-ssh-cli-auth Short Description: Jenkins SSH CLI client authenticator Owners: msrb sochotni mizdebsk msimacek Branches: InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069615] Review Request: jenkins-sshd - Jenkins sshd module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069615 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079960] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-sourcelookup - M2E Sources Lookup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079960 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070946] Review Request: python-SimpleCV - Open source framework for building computer vision applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070946 Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mru...@redhat.com Flags|fedora-review+ | --- Comment #5 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com --- Luis, you're supposed to do a manual review on all the form fields intentionally left blank in #c1 ! Esp. if you had done it, you had catched the bundled lib! E.g. https://github.com/sightmachine/SimpleCV/blob/master/SimpleCV/MachineLearning/query_imgs/flickrapi2.py # Copyright 2005 Brian Beej Jorgensen Hall b...@beej.us # # This work is licensed under the Creative Commons # Attribution License. To view a copy of this license, # visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ or send # a letter to Creative Commons, 543 Howard Street, 5th # Floor, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. # # This license says that I must be credited for any derivative works. # You do not need to credit me to simply use the FlickrAPI classes in # your Python scripts--you only need to credit me if you're taking this # FlickrAPI class and modifying it or redistributing it. So, copyright is wrong, too. And I didn't spoke about fonts yet. https://github.com/sightmachine/SimpleCV/tree/master/SimpleCV/fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079960] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-sourcelookup - M2E Sources Lookup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079960
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
MANUAL review, cause:
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException:
No solution found because the problem is unsatisfiable.:
[Unable to satisfy dependency from org.eclipse.m2e.maven.runtime
1.5.0.20140316-0047
to bundle org.eclipse.m2e.maven.runtime.slf4j.simple 0.0.0.;
No solution found because the problem is unsatisfiable.]
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- This seems like a Java package, please install fedora-review-plugin-java to
get additional checks
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or generated. 33 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/gil/1079960-eclipse-m2e-sourcelookup/review-
eclipse-m2e-sourcelookup/licensecheck.txt
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
Note: Using prebuilt rpms.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
FIXME
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
FIXME
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file
[Bug 1069614] Review Request: jenkins-ssh-cli-auth - Jenkins SSH CLI client authenticator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069614 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069614] Review Request: jenkins-ssh-cli-auth - Jenkins SSH CLI client authenticator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069614 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070946] Review Request: python-SimpleCV - Open source framework for building computer vision applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070946 Luis Bazan bazanlui...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079960] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-sourcelookup - M2E Sources Lookup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079960 --- Comment #3 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com --- Thank you for the review. I have submitted a request for upstream to include license text [1], but for now we need to keep a separate copy of the license. [1] https://github.com/ifedorenko/com.ifedorenko.m2e.sourcelookup/pull/5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070946] Review Request: python-SimpleCV - Open source framework for building computer vision applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070946 --- Comment #6 from Luis Bazan bazanlui...@gmail.com --- Please remove the bundled lib, thanks Matthias by this correction of my mistake. Regards! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079961] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-mavendev - Maven Development Tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079961 --- Comment #1 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com --- I have submitted a request for upstream to include license text [1], but for now we need to keep a separate copy of the license. [1] https://github.com/ifedorenko/com.ifedorenko.m2e.mavendev/pull/2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079960] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-sourcelookup - M2E Sources Lookup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079960 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: Review Request: eclipse-m2e-sourcelookup Short Description: M2E Sources Lookup Owners: mizdebsk mizdebsk sochotni msrb Branches: f20 InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069615] Review Request: jenkins-sshd - Jenkins sshd module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069615
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- This seems like a Java package, please install fedora-review-plugin-java to
get additional checks
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or generated. 11 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/gil/1069615-jenkins-sshd/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in jenkins-
sshd-javadoc
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor,
[Bug 1069702] Review Request: jenkins-ssh-credentials-plugin - Jenkins SSH Credentials Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069702 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079960] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-sourcelookup - M2E Sources Lookup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079960 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Fixed up name in Request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1059805] Review Request: greenmail - Suite of email servers for testing purposes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059805 --- Comment #3 from Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com --- spec and rpm are updated in place. All issues should be addressed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079960] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-sourcelookup - M2E Sources Lookup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079960 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069702] Review Request: jenkins-ssh-credentials-plugin - Jenkins SSH Credentials Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069702 --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- Please, consider upgrading to 1.6.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070946] Review Request: python-SimpleCV - Open source framework for building computer vision applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070946 --- Comment #7 from Luis Bazan bazanlui...@gmail.com --- Fonts meet licensing guidelines. - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Fonts Fonts Guidelines: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Package_layout_for_fonts Best Regards. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069702] Review Request: jenkins-ssh-credentials-plugin - Jenkins SSH Credentials Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069702
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- This seems like a Java package, please install fedora-review-plugin-java to
get additional checks
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
MIT/X11 (BSD like), Unknown or generated. 6 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1069702-jenkins-
ssh-credentials-plugin/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in jenkins-
ssh-credentials-plugin-javadoc
[x]: Package functions as described.
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
[!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not
[Bug 1063040] Review Request: rubygem-em-socksify - Transparent proxy support for any EventMachine protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063040
--- Comment #9 from Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com ---
Hey nitesh a couple things:
* Sorry if there was some confusion above but you _need_ Requires:
rubygem(eventmachine) = 1.0.0.beta4 but should _not_ have BuildRequires:
rubygem(eventmachine)
* The %{gem_instdir}/lib/* should not be marked as %{doc}, rather just have
%{gem_libdir} in the files list
Build looks good: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6667816
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1036755] Review Request: python-httpretty - HTTP client mock for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036755 --- Comment #23 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com --- I think a week should be fine considering this bug is here since December. Thanks for info. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079961] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-mavendev - Maven Development Tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079961 Bug 1079961 depends on bug 1079960, which changed state. Bug 1079960 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-m2e-sourcelookup - M2E Sources Lookup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079960 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079960] Review Request: eclipse-m2e-sourcelookup - M2E Sources Lookup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079960 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-03-24 10:31:34 --- Comment #6 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com --- Built in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6667928 Closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079617] Review Request: perl-Type-Tiny - Tiny, yet Moo(se)-compatible type constraint
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079617 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-03-24 10:45:50 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de --- Package now is in rawhide. f20 and f19 will follow, when perl-Exporter-Tiny will be available in f20 rsp. f19. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079618] Review Request: perl-MooX-late - Easily translate Moose code to Moo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079618 Bug 1079618 depends on bug 1079617, which changed state. Bug 1079617 Summary: Review Request: perl-Type-Tiny - Tiny, yet Moo(se)-compatible type constraint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079617 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 816869] Review Request: perl-VMware-API-LabManager - VMware LabManager API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816869 --- Comment #4 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- I haven't heard from upstream. I see a new version is out and it still mentions Perl Artistic 2.0 but points to regular Artistic 2.0 which is also attached. This is really old. I suggest you package the new version and I'll review the package again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069615] Review Request: jenkins-sshd - Jenkins sshd module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069615 Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Michal Srb m...@redhat.com --- Thanks! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jenkins-sshd Short Description: Jenkins sshd module Owners: msrb sochotni mizdebsk msimacek Branches: InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069702] Review Request: jenkins-ssh-credentials-plugin - Jenkins SSH Credentials Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069702 --- Comment #3 from Michal Srb m...@redhat.com --- Updated to 1.6.1: Spec URL: http://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/2/jenkins-ssh-credentials-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/2/jenkins-ssh-credentials-plugin-1.6.1-1.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069629] Review Request: jenkins-executable-war - Jenkins Executable War
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069629 Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Fixed In Version||jenkins-executable-war-1.29 ||-1.fc21 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-03-24 11:12:41 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
