[Bug 1104476] New: Review Request: python-wsgilog - WSGI logging and event reporting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104476 Bug ID: 1104476 Summary: Review Request: python-wsgilog - WSGI logging and event reporting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rhbgs.10.bigi_g...@xoxy.net QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://id-install-prd.ethz.ch/packages/python-wsgilog.spec SRPM URL: http://id-install-prd.ethz.ch/packages/python-wsgilog-0.3-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Supports logging events in WSGI applications to STDOUT, time rotated log files, email, syslog, and web servers. Also supports catching and sending HTML-formatted exception tracebacks to a web browser for debugging. Fedora Account System Username: pagiator Koji build URLs: f20: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6922976 rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6922978 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086217] Review Request: nodejs-strip-json-comments - Strip comments from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086217 --- Comment #7 from anish apa...@redhat.com --- Hi Tom Hughes! Thank you for your review comments, please find new SRPMS and spec file on Spec URL: http://anishpatil.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-strip-json-comments.spec SRPM URL: http://anishpatil.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-strip-json-comments-0.1.3-4.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086231] Review Request: nodejs-jsonparse - Pure-js JSON streaming parser for node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086231 --- Comment #7 from anish apa...@redhat.com --- Thanks for review comments, please find new spec file and SRPM file SPEC file:- http://anishpatil.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-jsonparse.spec SRPM file :- http://anishpatil.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-jsonparse-0.0.6-4.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092057] Review Request: golang-github-kdar-factorlog - Fast logging infrastructure for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092057 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-kdar-factorlo |golang-github-kdar-factorlo |g-0-0.1.git814d8f7.el6 |g-0-0.1.git814d8f7.fc20 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-kdar-factorlog-0-0.1.git814d8f7.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060989] Review Request: ghc-io-streams - Simple, composable, easy-to-use stream I/O
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060989 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-io-streams-1.1.4.5-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 908088] Review Request: ascend - ASCEND modelling environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908088 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- Package ascend-0.9.8-6.20140211svn4638.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing ascend-0.9.8-6.20140211svn4638.fc20' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7058/ascend-0.9.8-6.20140211svn4638.fc20 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092057] Review Request: golang-github-kdar-factorlog - Fast logging infrastructure for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092057 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-kdar-factorlo |golang-github-kdar-factorlo |g-0-0.1.git814d8f7.fc20 |g-0-0.1.git814d8f7.fc19 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-kdar-factorlog-0-0.1.git814d8f7.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069259] Review Request: ndoutils - Store Nagios configuration and event data in a database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069259 Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-06-04 03:59:05 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086217] Review Request: nodejs-strip-json-comments - Strip comments from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086217 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu --- That looks great now. Package is approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086231] Review Request: nodejs-jsonparse - Pure-js JSON streaming parser for node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086231 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu --- Looks great now. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086217] Review Request: nodejs-strip-json-comments - Strip comments from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086217 --- Comment #9 from anish apa...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: nodejs-strip-json-comments Short Description: strip comments from json Owners: anishpatil Branches: f20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086217] Review Request: nodejs-strip-json-comments - Strip comments from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086217 anish apa...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086231] Review Request: nodejs-jsonparse - Pure-js JSON streaming parser for node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086231 --- Comment #9 from anish apa...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: nodejs-jsonparse Short Description: Pure-js JSON streaming parser for node.js Owners: anishpatil Branches: f20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086231] Review Request: nodejs-jsonparse - Pure-js JSON streaming parser for node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086231 anish apa...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104579] New: Review Request: ghc-ieee754 - Utilities for dealing with IEEE floating point numbers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104579 Bug ID: 1104579 Summary: Review Request: ghc-ieee754 - Utilities for dealing with IEEE floating point numbers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: peter...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-ieee754.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-ieee754-0.7.3-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Utilities for dealing with IEEE floating point numbers, ported from the Tango math library; approximate and exact equality comparisons for general types. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103554] Review Request: cppcms - a Free High Performance Web Development Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103554 --- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net --- Why Bugzilla doesn't accept that?? At https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=account there are two (separate) fields for real name and email address. Enter the data and your password to confirm. That has worked before for other people, who had been asked to enter the real name. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104579] Review Request: ghc-ieee754 - Utilities for dealing with IEEE floating point numbers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104579 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- This package built on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6923287 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100961] Review Request: antimicro - Graphical program used to map keyboard buttons and mouse controls to a gamepad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100961 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- antimicro-2.4-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/antimicro-2.4-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100961] Review Request: antimicro - Graphical program used to map keyboard buttons and mouse controls to a gamepad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100961 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- antimicro-2.4-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/antimicro-2.4-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086217] Review Request: nodejs-strip-json-comments - Strip comments from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086217 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 877096] Review Request: perl-Fsdb - A set of commands for manipulating flat-text databases from the shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877096 --- Comment #35 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086217] Review Request: nodejs-strip-json-comments - Strip comments from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086217 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 877096] Review Request: perl-Fsdb - A set of commands for manipulating flat-text databases from the shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877096 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086231] Review Request: nodejs-jsonparse - Pure-js JSON streaming parser for node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086231 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086231] Review Request: nodejs-jsonparse - Pure-js JSON streaming parser for node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086231 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103466] Review Request: perl-Net-Statsd - Sends statistics to the stats daemon over UDP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103466 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103466] Review Request: perl-Net-Statsd - Sends statistics to the stats daemon over UDP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103466 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104604] New: Review Request: erlang-sd_notify - Erlang interface to systemd notify subsystem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104604 Bug ID: 1104604 Summary: Review Request: erlang-sd_notify - Erlang interface to systemd notify subsystem Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: lemen...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-sd_notify.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-sd_notify-0.1-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Erlang interface to systemd notify subsystem Fedora Account System Username: peter Koji scratch build for Rawhide: * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6921361 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104604] Review Request: erlang-sd_notify - Erlang interface to systemd notify subsystem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104604 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1103524 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103524 [Bug 1103524] Change rabbitmq-server systemd service to Type=notify -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103466] Review Request: perl-Net-Statsd - Sends statistics to the stats daemon over UDP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103466 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Net-Statsd-0.08-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-Statsd-0.08-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103466] Review Request: perl-Net-Statsd - Sends statistics to the stats daemon over UDP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103466 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103466] Review Request: perl-Net-Statsd - Sends statistics to the stats daemon over UDP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103466 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Net-Statsd-0.08-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-Statsd-0.08-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079732] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CustomErrorMessage - Catalyst plugin to have more cute error message
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079732 --- Comment #11 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org --- Hi Sven, Just a ping for the git work on this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086445] Review Request: dbusmenu-qt5 - A Qt 5 implementation of the DBusMenu protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086445 Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: dbusmenu-qt5 Short Description: A Qt 5 implementation of the DBusMenu protocol Upstream URL: https://launchpad.net/libdbusmenu-qt/ Owners: dvratil jgrulich ltinkl kkofler rdieter Branches: f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086231] Review Request: nodejs-jsonparse - Pure-js JSON streaming parser for node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086231 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-jsonparse-0.0.6-4.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-jsonparse-0.0.6-4.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086231] Review Request: nodejs-jsonparse - Pure-js JSON streaming parser for node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086231 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086445] Review Request: dbusmenu-qt5 - A Qt 5 implementation of the DBusMenu protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086445 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086445] Review Request: dbusmenu-qt5 - A Qt 5 implementation of the DBusMenu protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086445 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086217] Review Request: nodejs-strip-json-comments - Strip comments from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086217 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-strip-json-comments-0.1.3-4.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-strip-json-comments-0.1.3-4.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086217] Review Request: nodejs-strip-json-comments - Strip comments from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086217 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1096704] Review Request: python-bintrees - Binary-, RedBlack- and AVL-Trees in Python and Cython
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096704 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1096704] Review Request: python-bintrees - Binary-, RedBlack- and AVL-Trees in Python and Cython
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096704 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-bintrees-2.0.1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-bintrees-2.0.1-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070406] Review Request: signon - Accounts framework for Linux and POSIX based platforms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070406 Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(dvra...@redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #7 from Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com --- Updated spec with a patch to fix build (submitted upstream) Updated spec: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/spec/signon.spec Updated SRPML: http://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/spec/signon-8.56-3.fc20.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6923844 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103917] Review Request: python-cornice - Define Web Services in Pyramid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103917
Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com ---
I hereby approve of python-cornice into Fedora Packages Collection.
The rpmlint errors could be safely ignored.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or generated, *No copyright* MPL (v2.0). 4 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/haikel/1103917-python-
cornice/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages,
/usr/lib/python3.4
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages,
/usr/lib/python3.4
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 8 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[ ]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[ ]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
python3-cornice , python3-cornice-sphinx
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text
[Bug 1086445] Review Request: dbusmenu-qt5 - A Qt 5 implementation of the DBusMenu protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086445 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086445] Review Request: dbusmenu-qt5 - A Qt 5 implementation of the DBusMenu protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086445 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- dbusmenu-qt5-0.9.3-0.1.20140604bzr.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dbusmenu-qt5-0.9.3-0.1.20140604bzr.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103917] Review Request: python-cornice - Define Web Services in Pyramid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103917 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org --- Thanks for the review Haikel! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-cornice Short Description: Define Web Services in Pyramid Upstream URL: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/cornice Owners: bochecha lmacken hguemar Branches: devel el6 el7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104746] New: Review Request: soscleaner - sosreport data obfuscation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746 Bug ID: 1104746 Summary: Review Request: soscleaner - sosreport data obfuscation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jdun...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://people.redhahttp://people.redhat.com/jduncan/soscleaner/soscleaner.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jduncan/soscleaner/soscleaner-0.1-11.src.rpm Description: SOSCleaner helps users in environments that have data export restrictions clean up an sosreport so it can be safely uploaded to a support group for analysis. IT IS NOT ALL that should be done for this process, but it does help with the most common and repetitive items. This is going to be incorporated into the redhat-support-tool soon, and there is strong desire to have it as a standalone tool as well. This will, I hope, begin the process of creating the upstream for the project. This is my first package submission to Fedora. Fedora Account System Username: jduncan Thanks, Jamie Duncan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104746] Review Request: soscleaner - sosreport data obfuscation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746 --- Comment #1 from Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com --- EL6 Candidate Koji Build: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746 F20 Koji Build: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104746] Review Request: soscleaner - sosreport data obfuscation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746 --- Comment #2 from Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com --- don't know what happened there... EL6: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6924175 F20: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6924156 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104476] Review Request: python-wsgilog - WSGI logging and event reporting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104476
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||or...@cora.nwra.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|or...@cora.nwra.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= ISSUES =
- The .py files have CRLF line endings, would be good to fix that.
- Would be nice to have a separate license file
Neither of these are blockers though, so APPROVED.
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
BSD (3 clause). Detailed output of licensecheck in
/export/home/orion/redhat/python-wsgilog-0.3/1104476-python-
wsgilog/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and
[Bug 1104476] Review Request: python-wsgilog - WSGI logging and event reporting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104476 --- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com --- Sponsored now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104746] Review Request: soscleaner - sosreport data obfuscation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746 Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 825409] Review Request: gazebo - 3D multi-robot simulator with dynamics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825409 --- Comment #38 from Scott K Logan log...@cottsay.net --- Okay, I've done some more thorough testing. Lets first talk about the things I mentioned before: - %cmake macro - Addressed - make threading - Addressed - bundled fonts - Addressed - new version - Addressed Now for some new things: - Gazebo 3.0 added a build dependency on gdal-devel. This needs to be added as a run dependency in gazebo-devel [1]. - The fix for linking against player seems to have disappeared [2]. - We talked offline about this, but there is a pretty big difference in the way boost is influencing the behaviour of gzclient when there is no gazebo server running. The intended behaviour is that gzclient tries for 30 seconds and gives up. You should incorporate a patch to fix this, or Gazebo is essentially impossible to start using roslaunch [3]. - Since Gazebo explicitly needs sdformat 2, you should specify that in the build requirement. It took me a while to figure out why I couldn't build the new package...of course, updating sdformat to the newest RPM fixed it. - I found that when I added the correct PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the %check section, a large amount of the tests started working. Additionally, I analyzed the remaining three and found reasons that they may never work in fedora's build environment. I then blacklisted these tests, so all of them were succeeding when I built in mock on build slave. It looks like there are more tests that fail when built in Koji, so removing the /usr/bin/true from `make test` probably isn't a good idea, but it might be worth investigating the Koji failures eventually. The changes are at [4] and [5]. - I see that the base package depends on -media, but I'm wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea for -media to depend on the base as well. That way, there is still a separate noarch packge for the assets, but -media will be uninstalled with the base package. There really isn't a reason to have one without the other... I've implemented the changes and tested them. Feel free to use them directly, modify them, or not use them at all. I feel that this package is very close to being ready! [1] https://github.com/cottsay/gazebo-rpm/commit/7944d7b51eb91c1a64df34cdc7c0392f48a4 [2] https://github.com/cottsay/gazebo-rpm/commit/324f8e798473ca3d75aaed2883732eb6b5f36917 [3] https://github.com/cottsay/gazebo-rpm/commit/78c86e05018377f6b7acaa40d7845377fb757b99 [4] https://github.com/cottsay/gazebo-rpm/commit/19df7f9ad2a7cc7ad80160e6296024fd54bb9c04 [5] https://github.com/cottsay/gazebo-rpm/commit/68b8d4b6cc1891b291e8f2d5316b91e04f2755cc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103917] Review Request: python-cornice - Define Web Services in Pyramid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103917 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103917] Review Request: python-cornice - Define Web Services in Pyramid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103917 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104746] Review Request: soscleaner - sosreport data obfuscation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
--- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Spec URL:
http://people.redhahttp://people.redhat.com/jduncan/soscleaner/soscleaner.spec
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jduncan/soscleaner/soscleaner.spec
During review, keep the SRPM URL: and Spec URL: lines up-to-date when you
modify the package, so the fedora-review tool can be used. Consider running
fedora-review -b 1104746 to let that tool perform many helpful checks.
The spec file is full of mistakes and pitfalls.
%define name soscleaner
%define version 0.1
%define release 11
%{name}, %{version} and %{release} are implicitly defined by the Name:,
Version: and Release: tags, so it's very poor form to first define these
macros only to have the tags redefine the macros afterwards.
If you want these values at the top of the spec file, move the tags at the top.
Easy as that.
%define unmangled_version 0.1
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define
Source0: %{name}-%{unmangled_version}.tar.gz
That's not an URL:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL
Group: Applications
Not a group listed in /usr/share/doc/rpm/GROUPS and the Group tag is optional
nowadays. In case of doubt, remove the tag from the spec file:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Group_tag
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-buildroot
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
Prefix: %{_prefix}
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Relocatable_packages
Vendor: Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com
Packager: Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Tags
%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean
%files -f INSTALLED_FILES
As smart as you may find this technique, it hides too much under the carpet.
What about directory ownership, for example? Prefer listing files and
directories in the %files section directly. Use wildcards where helpful.
%defattr(-,root,root)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_Permissions
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104746] Review Request: soscleaner - sosreport data obfuscation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746 --- Comment #4 from Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com --- Michael, Thanks for the feedback. The spec file is *almost* 100% how it came from distutils. I will make the above changes and also take advantage of the tools you mention. Thanks again, Jamie Duncan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1081434] Review Request: ip2location - IP2location library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081434 --- Comment #20 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@redhat.com --- Thanks for the fixes, but i686 doesn't even build, which is one of the primary architectures: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6925071 Please try a scratch build to see if at least the primary architectures build successfully. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1061985] Review Request: coin-or-lemon - A C++ template library providing many common graph algorithms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061985 Andy Lutomirski l...@mit.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(l...@mit.edu) | --- Comment #4 from Andy Lutomirski l...@mit.edu --- Spec URL: http://web.mit.edu/luto/www/fedora/coin-or-lemon_v2/coin-or-lemon.spec SRPM URL: http://web.mit.edu/luto/www/fedora/coin-or-lemon_v2/coin-or-lemon-1.3-2.fc20.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6925124 Description: LEMON stands for Library for Efficient Modeling and Optimization in Networks. It is a C++ template library providing efficient implementations of common data structures and algorithms with focus on combinatorial optimization tasks connected mainly with graphs and networks. Fedora Account System Username: amluto This version should be a lot better. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104746] Review Request: soscleaner - sosreport data obfuscation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746 --- Comment #5 from Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com --- Michael and everyone else. It's amazing how much more sense the Packaging Guide makes when you have a little push in the right direction and a goal. I've refactored the spec file to be (I think) in line with the guidelines. I've also confirmed it builds of course both on my local system and in Koji. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6925123 I bumped up the release number to 12, with artifacts available at: SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jduncan/soscleaner/soscleaner-0.1-12.src.rpm Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jduncan/soscleaner/soscleaner.spec Thanks again for helping to straighten me out. Jamie Duncan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104746] Review Request: soscleaner - sosreport data obfuscation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746 --- Comment #6 from Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com --- Created attachment 902362 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=902362action=edit f-e review.txt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1026252] Review Request: kluppe - a live looping instrument
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026252 --- Comment #5 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at --- Brendan? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 957715] Review Request: gamgi - Build, View and Analyse Atomic Structures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957715 --- Comment #4 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at --- Shall we close this review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060924] Review Request: rubygem-unicode - Unicode normalization library for Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060924
--- Comment #3 from Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Ken Dreyer from comment #1)
Mind conditionalizing the Requires and Provides to follow the latest Ruby
Packaging Guidelines? For example:
%if 0%{?fc19} || 0%{?fc20} || 0%{?el7}
Requires: ruby
Requires: ruby(rubygems)
%endif
%if 0%{?fc19} || 0%{?fc20} || 0%{?el7}
Provides: rubygem(%{gem_name}) = %{version}
%endif
I conditionalized the rubygem Requires/Provides. The requirement on ruby is
still needed though, since this is a C extension so it's only compatible with
MRI.
Also, I'm getting a build failure on Rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6900143
mv: cannot stat
'/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/rubygem-unicode-0.4.4-1.fc21.x86_64/usr/share/
gems/gems/unicode-0.4.4/lib/unicode': No such file or directory
Looks like on F21+ rubygems has been made smarter about installing C extensions
to %{_libdir} so I have conditionalized the paths here as well.
I also updated to 0.4.4.1 of the gem, which is just a change to add license
metadata to the gemspec.
http://fedorapeople.org/~dcallagh/rubygem-unicode/rubygem-unicode.spec
http://fedorapeople.org/~dcallagh/rubygem-unicode/rubygem-unicode-0.4.4.1-1.fc21.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093406] Review Request: python-junitxml - pyunit extension to output JUnit compatible XML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093406 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-junitxml-0.7-1.fc20 |python-junitxml-0.7-1.el6 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-junitxml-0.7-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103466] Review Request: perl-Net-Statsd - Sends statistics to the stats daemon over UDP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103466 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Net-Statsd-0.08-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104746] Review Request: soscleaner - sosreport data obfuscation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746 --- Comment #7 from Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com --- SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jduncan/soscleaner/soscleaner-0.1-12.fc20.src.rpm Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jduncan/soscleaner/soscleaner.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104746] Review Request: soscleaner - sosreport data obfuscation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746 --- Comment #8 from Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com --- have gone through fedora-review a few times and it looks solid to me at this point. Definitely a learning experience. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104907] New: Free and simple TrueCrypt Implementation based on dm-crypt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104907 Bug ID: 1104907 Summary: Free and simple TrueCrypt Implementation based on dm-crypt Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: villadalm...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org tcplay is a free (BSD-licensed), pretty much fully featured (including multiple keyfiles, cipher cascades, etc) and stable TrueCrypt implementation http://villadalmine.fedorapeople.org/tcplay.spec http://villadalmine.fedorapeople.org/tc-play-1.0.0rc-1.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103917] Review Request: python-cornice - Define Web Services in Pyramid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103917 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-06-04 22:57:48 --- Comment #4 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org --- Thanks for the Git Jon! Package built, closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1104907] Free and simple TrueCrypt Implementation based on dm-crypt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104907 --- Comment #1 from Rino Rondan villadalm...@gmail.com --- please close.. package duplicate -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092828] Review Request: turses - A Twitter client for the console
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092828 --- Comment #6 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com --- Ok tweepy has been updated by me in rawhide and f20, please go ahead. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087734] Review Request: php-horde-imp - A web based webmail system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087734 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||php-horde-imp-6.1.7-2.fc20 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-horde-imp-6.1.7-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 949038] Review Request: php-horde-horde - Horde Application Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949038 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||php-horde-horde-5.1.6-3.fc2 ||0 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-horde-horde-5.1.6-3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087772] Review Request: php-horde-kronolith - A web based calendar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087772 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||php-horde-kronolith-4.1.5-2 ||.fc20 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-horde-kronolith-4.1.5-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086217] Review Request: nodejs-strip-json-comments - Strip comments from JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086217 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-strip-json-comments-0.1.3-4.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087742] Review Request: php-horde-turba - A web based address book
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087742 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||php-horde-turba-4.1.4-2.fc2 ||0 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-horde-turba-4.1.4-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086445] Review Request: dbusmenu-qt5 - A Qt 5 implementation of the DBusMenu protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086445 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- dbusmenu-qt5-0.9.3-0.1.20140604bzr.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087740] Review Request: php-horde-nag - A web based task list manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087740 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||php-horde-nag-4.1.4-3.fc20 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-horde-nag-4.1.4-3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1096704] Review Request: python-bintrees - Binary-, RedBlack- and AVL-Trees in Python and Cython
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096704 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-bintrees-2.0.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087737] Review Request: php-horde-ingo - An email filter rules manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087737 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||php-horde-ingo-3.1.4-2.fc20 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-horde-ingo-3.1.4-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086231] Review Request: nodejs-jsonparse - Pure-js JSON streaming parser for node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086231 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- Package nodejs-jsonparse-0.0.6-4.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing nodejs-jsonparse-0.0.6-4.fc20' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7097/nodejs-jsonparse-0.0.6-4.fc20 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
