[Bug 1151415] Review Request: perl-Return-MultiLevel - Return across multiple call levels

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151415

David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #3 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org ---
Agreed.  %perl_default_filter macro has been removed.

Thanks Petr!

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-Return-MultiLevel
Short Description: Return across multiple call levels
Upstream URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Return-MultiLevel/
Owners: ddick
Branches: f20, f21, epel7
InitialCC: perl-sig

 -

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1150610] Review Request: kalibrate-rtl - GSM based frequency calibration for rtl-sdr

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150610

Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: kalibrate-rtl
Short Description: GSM based frequency calibration for rtl-sdr
Upstream URL: http://github.com/steve-m/kalibrate-rtl
Owners: jskarvad
Branches: f20 f21 epel7
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1071204] Review Request: perl-Gtk3-WebKit - WebKit bindings for Perl

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071204

David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #8 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: perl-Gtk3-WebKit
New Branches: epel7
Owners: ddick
InitialCC: perl-sig

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 886192] Review Request: perl-Module-Package-Au - Reusable Module::Install bits

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886192
Bug 886192 depends on bug 874743, which changed state.

Bug 874743 Summary: Review Request: perl-Unicode-EastAsianWidth - East Asian 
Width properties
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874743

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 874743] Review Request: perl-Unicode-EastAsianWidth - East Asian Width properties

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874743

Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Unicode-EastAsianWidth
   ||-1.33-3.fc22
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2014-10-13 04:46:22



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1151779] Review Request: golang-gopkg-check - Rich testing for the Go language

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151779

Lokesh Mandvekar l...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||l...@fedoraproject.org
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|l...@fedoraproject.org
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1151778] Review Request: golang-github-elazarl-go-bindata-assetfs - Serve embedded files from jteeuwen/go-bindata

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151778

Lokesh Mandvekar l...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||l...@fedoraproject.org
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|l...@fedoraproject.org
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1151778] Review Request: golang-github-elazarl-go-bindata-assetfs - Serve embedded files from jteeuwen/go-bindata

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151778

Lokesh Mandvekar l...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package approved. Spec file conforms to current Go packaging draft.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1151779] Review Request: golang-gopkg-check - Rich testing for the Go language

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151779

Lokesh Mandvekar l...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package approved. Spec file conforms to current Go packaging draft.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1094581] Review Request: drupal7-admin_menu - Provides a theme-independent administration interface

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094581

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1099269] Review Request: drupal7-admin_theme - Allows you to define a different theme for admin pages

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099269



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-admin_theme-1.0-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-admin_theme-1.0-2.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1094581] Review Request: drupal7-admin_menu - Provides a theme-independent administration interface

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094581



--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-admin_menu-3.0-0.4.rc4.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-admin_menu-3.0-0.4.rc4.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1099269] Review Request: drupal7-admin_theme - Allows you to define a different theme for admin pages

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099269

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1095593] Review Request: drupal7-block_class - Block Class allows users to add classes via block configuration interface

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095593

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1095593] Review Request: drupal7-block_class - Block Class allows users to add classes via block configuration interface

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095593



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-block_class-2.1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-block_class-2.1-1.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1099269] Review Request: drupal7-admin_theme - Allows you to define a different theme for admin pages

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099269



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-admin_theme-1.0-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-admin_theme-1.0-2.el7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1095593] Review Request: drupal7-block_class - Block Class allows users to add classes via block configuration interface

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095593



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-block_class-2.1-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-block_class-2.1-1.el7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1095593] Review Request: drupal7-block_class - Block Class allows users to add classes via block configuration interface

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095593



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-block_class-2.1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-block_class-2.1-1.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1094581] Review Request: drupal7-admin_menu - Provides a theme-independent administration interface

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094581



--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-admin_menu-3.0-0.4.rc4.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-admin_menu-3.0-0.4.rc4.el7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1099267] Review Request: drupal7-addressfield - Address Field defines a new field type to store intl addresses

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099267



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-addressfield-1.0-0.2.beta5.fc20 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-addressfield-1.0-0.2.beta5.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1099267] Review Request: drupal7-addressfield - Address Field defines a new field type to store intl addresses

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099267

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1151779] Review Request: golang-gopkg-check - Rich testing for the Go language

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151779

Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #2 from Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: golang-gopkg-check
Short Description: Rich testing for the Go language
Upstream URL: http://gopkg.in/check.v1
Owners: jchaloup lsm5 vbatts
Branches: f21 f20 f19 el6
InitialCC: golang-sig

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1151778] Review Request: golang-github-elazarl-go-bindata-assetfs - Serve embedded files from jteeuwen/go-bindata

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151778

Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #2 from Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: golang-github-elazarl-go-bindata-assetfs
Short Description: Serve embedded files from jteeuwen/go-bindata
Upstream URL: https://github.com/elazarl/go-bindata-assetfs
Owners: jchaloup lsm5 vbatts
Branches: f21 f20 f19 el6
InitialCC: golang-sig

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1152047] New: Review Request: jenkins-matrix-project-plugin - Jenkins Matrix Project Plugin

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152047

Bug ID: 1152047
   Summary: Review Request: jenkins-matrix-project-plugin -
Jenkins Matrix Project Plugin
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/jenkins-matrix-project-plugin.spec
SRPM URL:
https://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/jenkins-matrix-project-plugin-1.3-1.fc22.src.rpm
Description: This package provides Jenkins plugin which adds support for
Multi-configuration (matrix) project type.
Fedora Account System Username: msrb

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1152047] Review Request: jenkins-matrix-project-plugin - Jenkins Matrix Project Plugin

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152047

Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183
[Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1094581] Review Request: drupal7-admin_menu - Provides a theme-independent administration interface

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094581



--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-admin_menu-3.0-0.4.rc4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-admin_menu-3.0-0.4.rc4.el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1094581] Review Request: drupal7-admin_menu - Provides a theme-independent administration interface

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094581



--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-admin_menu-3.0-0.4.rc4.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-admin_menu-3.0-0.4.rc4.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1099269] Review Request: drupal7-admin_theme - Allows you to define a different theme for admin pages

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099269



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-admin_theme-1.0-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-admin_theme-1.0-2.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1099269] Review Request: drupal7-admin_theme - Allows you to define a different theme for admin pages

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099269



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-admin_theme-1.0-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-admin_theme-1.0-2.el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1099267] Review Request: drupal7-addressfield - Address Field defines a new field type to store intl addresses

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099267



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-addressfield-1.0-0.2.beta5.fc19 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-addressfield-1.0-0.2.beta5.fc19

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-addressfield-1.0-0.2.beta5.el7 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-addressfield-1.0-0.2.beta5.el7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1099267] Review Request: drupal7-addressfield - Address Field defines a new field type to store intl addresses

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099267



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-addressfield-1.0-0.2.beta5.fc19 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-addressfield-1.0-0.2.beta5.fc19

--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-addressfield-1.0-0.2.beta5.el7 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-addressfield-1.0-0.2.beta5.el7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1095593] Review Request: drupal7-block_class - Block Class allows users to add classes via block configuration interface

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095593



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-block_class-2.1-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-block_class-2.1-1.el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1152057] New: Review Request: csnappy - Snappy compression library ported to C

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152057

Bug ID: 1152057
   Summary: Review Request: csnappy - Snappy compression library
ported to C
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/csnappy/csnappy.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/csnappy/csnappy-0-0.20141010gitb43c183.fc22.src.rpm
Description:
This is an ANSI C port of Google's Snappy library. Snappy is a compression
library designed for speed rather than compression ratios.

Fedora Account System Username: ppisar

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1099267] Review Request: drupal7-addressfield - Address Field defines a new field type to store intl addresses

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099267



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-addressfield-1.0-0.2.beta5.el6 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-addressfield-1.0-0.2.beta5.el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1151843] Review Request: perl-WebService-Dropbox - Perl interface to Dropbox API

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151843

Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||psab...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1094581] Review Request: drupal7-admin_menu - Provides a theme-independent administration interface

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094581

Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pnem...@redhat.com
  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #27 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com ---
I got the permission from this package submitter to build his packages. I see
this package missed f21 branch please create it.

Package Change Request
===
Package Name: drupal7-admin_menu
New Branches: f21
Owners: cycloptivity asrob siwinski

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1095593] Review Request: drupal7-block_class - Block Class allows users to add classes via block configuration interface

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095593

Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pnem...@redhat.com
  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #13 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com ---
I got the permission from this package submitter to build his packages. I see
this package missed f21 branch please create it.

Package Change Request
===
Package Name: drupal7-block_class
New Branches: f21
Owners: cycloptivity asrob siwinski

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1099269] Review Request: drupal7-admin_theme - Allows you to define a different theme for admin pages

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099269

Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pnem...@redhat.com
  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #12 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com ---
I got the permission from this package submitter to build his packages. I see
this package missed f21 branch please create it.

Package Change Request
===
Package Name: drupal7-admin_theme
New Branches: f21
Owners: cycloptivity asrob siwinski

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1099267] Review Request: drupal7-addressfield - Address Field defines a new field type to store intl addresses

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099267

Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pnem...@redhat.com
  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #12 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com ---
I got the permission from this package submitter to build his packages. I see
this package missed f21 branch please create it.

Package Change Request
===
Package Name: drupal7-addressfield
New Branches: f21
Owners: cycloptivity asrob siwinski

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1121074] Review Request: rubygem-cliver - Cross-platform version constraints for cli tools

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121074

Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jstri...@redhat.com
  Flags||needinfo?(jstribny@redhat.c
   ||om)



--- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com ---
ping! Any progress here?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1077795] Review Request: copr-selinux - SELinux module for COPR

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077795



--- Comment #6 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com ---
Updated:
SRPM URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/copr/copr-selinux-1.32-1.fc21.src.rpm
Spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/copr/copr-selinux.spec

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1151843] Review Request: perl-WebService-Dropbox - Perl interface to Dropbox API

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151843



--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
You're missing some build deps
For running Build.PL:
 - CPAN::Meta, Build.PL:15
 - CPAN::Meta::Prereqs, Build.PL:16
 - File::Basename, Build.PL:13
 - File::Spec, Build.PL:14
 - utf8, Build.PL:10
Then for running the test suite:
 - Data::Dumper, t/05_accessor.t:2, t/10_api.t:2, t/11_range.t:2, t/12_304.t:2
 - Encode, t/05_accessor.t:3, t/10_api.t:3, t/11_range.t:3, t/12_304.t:3
 - File::Temp, t/05_accessor.t:5, t/10_api.t:5, t/11_range.t:5, t/12_304.t:5
 - HTTP::Request, lib/WebService/Dropbox.pm:47 (via import() - use_lwp())
 - IO::File, t/05_accessor.t:6, t/10_api.t:6, t/11_range.t:6, t/12_304.t:6

Next, unused dependencies which should be removed:
 - IO::Socket::SSL -- not used if Furl is not available

Missing a runtime dependency; this one won't be autodetected:
 - HTTP::Request, lib/WebService/Dropbox.pm:47

The specific perl version BR is rather unnecessary.

Also, filter out all those underspecified dependencies.

Don't repeat the module name in the %description.  Begin it with A Perl
interface... or similar instead.  And end it with a period.  Also, consider
including the points from upstream POD description.
http://search.cpan.org/dist/WebService-Dropbox/lib/WebService/Dropbox.pm#DESCRIPTION

Don't package distribution meta files in %doc.  End users have no need for
them.  This includes cpanfile, META.json and minil.toml.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1151759] Review Request: tclbsd - Interfacing to various BSD UNIX system calls and routines

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151759



--- Comment #7 from Ma Kai crtm...@gmail.com ---
Thanks for your reviews. These problems are fixed. (I reported the permission
problem to the upstream as well.)

Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ekd123/fedora/master/tcl-tclbsd.spec
SRPM URL: http://ekd123.org/tcl-tclbsd-1.6-3.fc21.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1141494] Review Request: python-flask-whooshalchemy - Whoosh extension to Flask/SQLAlchemy

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141494

Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||msu...@redhat.com



--- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com ---
BTW there is already in Fedora:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/python-flask-whooshee
which is packaged version of:
https://github.com/bkabrda/flask-whooshee

While
  https://github.com/gyllstromk/Flask-WhooshAlchemy
is different project. There is nothing bad on having two packages with same
functionality in Fedora per se. But you may consider joining force.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1119056] Review Request: python-idna - Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA)

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119056

Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||msu...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|msu...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1119056] Review Request: python-idna - Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA)

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119056

Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tom.pri...@ualberta.net
  Flags||needinfo?(tom.prince@ualber
   ||ta.net)



--- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com ---
Just quick review for start:

License need to be:
License:BSD and Python and something

where something is Unicode, but I could not find it in list of approved
licenses:
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing
and UCD is not similar to actual license on Unicode site.

What code in this module actually use that Unicode license?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 755510] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet - Gnome shell system monitor extension

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755510



--- Comment #65 from Jeff Peeler jpee...@redhat.com ---
You don't need to ask permission for reviewing other packages. Just review the
package so that you can show a sponsor, Hey, I know enough about packaging to
be trusted to generally do the right thing. A good start is utilization of the
fedora-review tool (mentioned here
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process). Perhaps you can even
find another gnome extension to package in order to use the knowledge you've
learned.

I understand that there is a lot to learn about packaging, but your reviews nor
your official package submission has to be perfect. That's one thing the entire
process is designed to do - that is correct your mistakes.

I can't approve you to be a packager, but I can look over your package reviews
to make it easier for your package reviews to be reviewed. I'm trying to do
everything I can for you here :) That said, if nothing happens within a very
long time span, say 6 months, I'll probably un-CC myself from this bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1128253] Review Request: gerrymander - A client API and command line tool for gerrit

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128253



--- Comment #25 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
is this built on koji?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1062315] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-fbturbo - Xorg X11 fbturbo video driver

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062315



--- Comment #15 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
any updates here?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1078327] Review Request: github2fedmsg - Pubsubhubbub app that rebroadcasts GH events over fedmsg

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078327

Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #24 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: github2fedmsg
New Branches: epel7
Owners: ralph

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1078315] Review Request: python-pyramid-mako - Mako template bindings for the Pyramid web framework

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078315

Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #12 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: python-pyramid-mako
New Branches: epel7
Owners: ralph

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 833204] Review Request: python-pyramid-tm - Allows pyramid requests to join the active transaction

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833204

Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #14 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: python-pyramid-tm
New Branches: epel7
Owners: ralph

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 674692] Review Request: python-pyramid - The Pyramid web application framework, a Pylons project

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674692

Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rb...@redhat.com
  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #16 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: python-pyramid
New Branches: epel7
Owners: ralph

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1152047] Review Request: jenkins-matrix-project-plugin - Jenkins Matrix Project Plugin

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152047

gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||punto...@libero.it
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1151747] Review request: onionshare - share files of any size securely and anonymously

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151747



--- Comment #7 from pjp pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in ---
   Hello Robert,

(In reply to Robert Mayr from comment #6)
 1) The guidelines for the github commit contain also a shortcommit
 instruction. I think it's better to add it.

It's not used in the spec file. I think it's used for 'pre-release'
packages.[1]

---
  ...If no numeric version is indicated in the code, you may set Version to 0,
and treat the package as a pre-release package (and make use of the
%{shortcommit} macro).
---

 2) You should use either $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot}, don't mix them up.

  Fixed.

 3) in the %files section you have %{_datadir}/* - is the package the owner
 of all the stuff beside it? It's better to define the single directories
 separately, IMHO.

  done.

 4) Use valid macros for the name instead of hardcoding

  ...? 

 5) Your desktop file has a deprecated Encoding instruction in the [Desktop
 Entry] section.

  Fixed. (I'll let the upstream know about it)


Please see:
  - https://pjp.fedorapeople.org/onionshare.spec
  - https://pjp.fedorapeople.org/onionshare-0.6-4.fc19.src.rpm
  - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7851242


Thank you.
---
[1] - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Github

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1152244] New: Review Request: unsafe-mock - A mock of sun.misc.Unsafe

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152244

Bug ID: 1152244
   Summary: Review Request: unsafe-mock - A mock of
sun.misc.Unsafe
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: mmo...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://mmorsi.fedorapeople.org/staging/unsafe-mock.spec
SRPM URL:
https://mmorsi.fedorapeople.org/staging/unsafe-mock-8.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description: 
A mock of sun.misc.Unsafe for the JRuby build system

Fedora Account System Username: mmorsi

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1152245] New: Review Request: jsr292-mock - Mock versions of java.lang.invoke

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152245

Bug ID: 1152245
   Summary: Review Request: jsr292-mock - Mock versions of
java.lang.invoke
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: mmo...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://mmorsi.fedorapeople.org/staging/jsr292-mock.spec
SRPM URL:
https://mmorsi.fedorapeople.org/staging/jsr292-mock-1.1-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description: 
A mock of java.lang.invoke for JRuby

Fedora Account System Username: mmorsi

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1152246] New: Review Request: joda-timezones - Timezone data for joda-time

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152246

Bug ID: 1152246
   Summary: Review Request: joda-timezones - Timezone data for
joda-time
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: mmo...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://mmorsi.fedorapeople.org/staging/joda-timezones.spec
SRPM URL:
https://mmorsi.fedorapeople.org/staging/joda-timezones-2013d-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description: 
Timezone data for joda-time

Fedora Account System Username: mmorsi

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1152247] New: Review Request: options - Library for managing sets of JVM properties to configure an app or library

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152247

Bug ID: 1152247
   Summary: Review Request: options - Library for managing sets of
JVM properties to configure an app or library
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: mmo...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://mmorsi.fedorapeople.org/staging/options.spec
SRPM URL: https://mmorsi.fedorapeople.org/staging/options-1.2-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description: 
Provides a simple mechanism for defining JVM property-based
configuration for an application or library.

Fedora Account System Username: mmorsi

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 875274] Review Request: python-velruse - Simplify third-party authentication for web applications

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875274

Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #16 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: python-velruse
New Branches: epel7
Owners: ralph

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 451405] Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451405

Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rb...@redhat.com
  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #19 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: python-weberror
New Branches: epel7
Owners: ralph

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1152246] Review Request: joda-timezones - Timezone data for joda-time

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152246

Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1152249




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152249
[Bug 1152249] Update to latest JRuby 1.7.16
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1108813] Review Request: python-ZEO - Client-server storage implementation for ZODB

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108813



--- Comment #3 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com ---
Christopher, are you able to do this review, or are you not?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1152245] Review Request: jsr292-mock - Mock versions of java.lang.invoke

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152245

Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1152249




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152249
[Bug 1152249] Update to latest JRuby 1.7.16
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1152244] Review Request: unsafe-mock - A mock of sun.misc.Unsafe

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152244

Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1152249




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152249
[Bug 1152249] Update to latest JRuby 1.7.16
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1152247] Review Request: options - Library for managing sets of JVM properties to configure an app or library

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152247

Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1152249




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152249
[Bug 1152249] Update to latest JRuby 1.7.16
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1152047] Review Request: jenkins-matrix-project-plugin - Jenkins Matrix Project Plugin

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152047

gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1152047] Review Request: jenkins-matrix-project-plugin - Jenkins Matrix Project Plugin

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152047

gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1135654] Review Request: libpuma - Library for parsing and manipulating C/C++ source code

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135654

Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
   Assignee|i...@cicku.me  |nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Flags|fedora-review?  |



--- Comment #2 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com ---
In accordance with the policy for stalled reviews, where the reviewer is not
responding, I note that there was no action from the reviewer for one month
prior to Comment 1, and that more than a week has passed since, still with no
action and no communication from the reviewer.  Therefore, I am invoking
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainer_policy#Reviewer_not_responding

This review has been reset to the unassigned state.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1152047] Review Request: jenkins-matrix-project-plugin - Jenkins Matrix Project Plugin

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152047



--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Source package does not include license text. Please, you SHOULD query upstream
to include it.

found non-blocking issues, approved

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1144087] Review Request: btest - A Simple Driver for Basic Unit Tests

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144087

Fabian Affolter m...@fabian-affolter.ch changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(d...@der-flo.net)  |



--- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter m...@fabian-affolter.ch ---
cicku, is there documentation available?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1151747] Review request: onionshare - share files of any size securely and anonymously

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151747



--- Comment #9 from Robert Mayr robyd...@gmail.com ---
Oh, and maybe it's better to put your instruction to get rif of the Encoding
key into %prep, before the %build section.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1152312] New: Review Request: cloudtoserver - Tool to convert Fedora Cloud instance to Fedora Server instance

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152312

Bug ID: 1152312
   Summary: Review Request: cloudtoserver - Tool to convert Fedora
Cloud instance to Fedora Server instance
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: kushal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/cloudtoserver.spec
SRPM URL:
https://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/cloudtoserver-0.1-1.el6.src.rpm
Description: Tool to convert Fedora Cloud instance to Fedora Server instance
Fedora Account System Username: kushal

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1080203] Review Request: perl-Excel-Template-Plus - An extension to the Excel::Template module

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080203



--- Comment #5 from Sven Nierlein sven.nierl...@consol.de ---
sorry my bad, spec and source rpm is here:
http://www.nierlein.com/fedora/2014-10-13/perl-Excel-Template-Plus-0.05-3.fc22.src.rpm
http://www.nierlein.com/fedora/2014-10-13/perl-Excel-Template-Plus.spec

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1152312] Review Request: cloudtoserver - Tool to convert Fedora Cloud instance to Fedora Server instance

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152312



--- Comment #1 from Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com ---
Newer package and spec:

Spec URL: https://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/cloudtoserver.spec
SRPM URL:
https://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/cloudtoserver-0.1-2.el6.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1152312] Review Request: cloudtoserver - Tool to convert Fedora Cloud instance to Fedora Server instance

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152312



--- Comment #2 from Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com ---
Newer package and spec:

Spec URL: https://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/cloudtoserver.spec
SRPM URL:
https://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/cloudtoserver-0.1-3.el6.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1152312] Review Request: cloudtoserver - Tool to convert Fedora Cloud instance to Fedora Server instance

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152312

Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||puiterw...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|puiterw...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@redhat.com ---
This package is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1152312] Review Request: cloudtoserver - Tool to convert Fedora Cloud instance to Fedora Server instance

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152312



--- Comment #4 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
 for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
 from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

= EXTRA items =

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
---
Checking: cloudtoserver-0.1-3.fc21.noarch.rpm
  cloudtoserver-0.1-3.fc21.src.rpm
cloudtoserver.noarch: E: changelog-time-in-future 2014-10-14
cloudtoserver.src: E: changelog-time-in-future 2014-10-14
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)

# 

[Bug 168838] Review Request: cpanspec

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168838



--- Comment #10 from Luigi Iotti lu...@iotti.biz ---
Yes, I was referring to Steven Pritchard. Sorry for the confusion, but the
package maintainer is listed only as steve here
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/cpanspec/bugs/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1152312] Review Request: cloudtoserver - Tool to convert Fedora Cloud instance to Fedora Server instance

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152312

Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #5 from Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: cloudtoserver
Short Description: Tool to convert Fedora Cloud instance to Fedora Server
instance
Upstream URL: https://github.com/fedora-cloud/cloudtoserver
Owners: kushal
Branches: f21
InitialCC: kushal

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1099267] Review Request: drupal7-addressfield - Address Field defines a new field type to store intl addresses

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099267

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-addressfield-1.0-0.2.beta5.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6
testing repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1094581] Review Request: drupal7-admin_menu - Provides a theme-independent administration interface

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094581

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-admin_menu-3.0-0.4.rc4.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1025292] Review Request: python-twiggy - A Pythonic logger

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025292



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-twiggy-0.4.5-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1132971] Review Request: python-pyvmomi - pyVmomi is the Python SDK for the VMware vSphere API that allows you to manage ESX, ESXi, and vCenter

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132971

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|python-pyvmomi-5.5.0.2014.1 |python-pyvmomi-5.5.0.2014.1
   |.1-2.fc19   |.1-3.el7



--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-pyvmomi-5.5.0.2014.1.1-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 851745] Review Request: python-bitlyapi - A thin python wrapper for the bit.ly REST API

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851745



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-bitlyapi-0.1.1-5.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1095593] Review Request: drupal7-block_class - Block Class allows users to add classes via block configuration interface

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095593

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-block_class-2.1-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1144886] Review Request: hackrf - Utilities for HackRF

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144886

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||hackrf-2014.08.1-1.el7
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2014-10-13 17:40:36



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
hackrf-2014.08.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 848256] Review Request: python-taskw - Python bindings for your taskwarrior database

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848256



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-taskw-0.8.6-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1132971] Review Request: python-pyvmomi - pyVmomi is the Python SDK for the VMware vSphere API that allows you to manage ESX, ESXi, and vCenter

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132971

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|python-pyvmomi-5.5.0.2014.1 |python-pyvmomi-5.5.0.2014.1
   |.1-3.el7|.1-3.el6



--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-pyvmomi-5.5.0.2014.1.1-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1099269] Review Request: drupal7-admin_theme - Allows you to define a different theme for admin pages

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099269

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-admin_theme-1.0-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1146551] Review Request: nex - A lexer generator for Go that is similar to Lex/Flex

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146551



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nex-20140621-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 168838] Review Request: cpanspec

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168838



--- Comment #11 from Luigi Iotti lu...@iotti.biz ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: cpanspec
New Branches: epel7
Owners: Lux

Since Steve did not respond in about 2 months, I would like to ask if I may
maintain the cpanspec package for epel7. Obviously Steve would be welcome shoud
he respond in the future.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1060519] Review Request: qm-dsp - Library for DSP and Music Informatics purposes

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060519

Martin Milata mmil...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||val...@civ.zcu.cz
  Flags||needinfo?(val...@civ.zcu.cz
   ||)



--- Comment #4 from Martin Milata mmil...@redhat.com ---
Looks pretty good!

The only guideline not followed I've been able to find is All patches should
have an upstream bug link or comment[1] - can you submit
qm-dsp-cxx-build.patch (or does [2] do the same?) and qm-dsp-install.patch
upstream and include a link/comment?

Also, it makes sense to try to be close to upstream but can you perhaps open an
upstream bug for supporting shared library builds (provided qm-vamp-plugins can
use it)?

[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment
[2]
https://code.soundsoftware.ac.uk/projects/qm-dsp/repository/revisions/915365c58758

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 916087] Review Request: cloud-initramfs-tools - cloud image initramfs management utilities

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916087

Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||or...@cora.nwra.com



--- Comment #31 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
Any interest in maintaining this in EPEL7?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 191603] Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191603

Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 194470] Review Request: php-magickwand

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194470

Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 191603] Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191603



--- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 194470] Review Request: php-magickwand

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194470



--- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 215865] Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki notekeeper

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=215865



--- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 225341] Review Request: php-pear-PHP-CodeSniffer - PHP coding standards enforcement tool

2014-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225341



--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

  1   2   3   >