[Bug 1159965] Review Request: python-deltasigma - Package to create Delta Sigma modulators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159965 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-deltasigma-0.1-4.fc2 |python-deltasigma-0.1-4.fc2 |1 |0 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-deltasigma-0.1-4.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159965] Review Request: python-deltasigma - Package to create Delta Sigma modulators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159965 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-deltasigma-0.1-4.fc2 |python-deltasigma-0.1-4.fc1 |0 |9 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-deltasigma-0.1-4.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162484] Review Request: python-unittest2 - The new features in unittest backported to Python 2.4+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162484 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-unittest2-0.8.0-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1123654] Review Request: smemstat - Shared memory usage monitoring tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123654 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|smemstat-0.01.10-2.fc19 |smemstat-0.01.10-2.fc20 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- smemstat-0.01.10-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1089493] Review Request: bashmount - A menu-driven bash script for mounting removable media
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089493 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||bashmount-3.2.0-3.fc21 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- bashmount-3.2.0-3.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159315] Review Request: multiverse - A software transactional memory implementation for the JVM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159315 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- multiverse-0.7.0-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1150666] Review Request: gr-iqbal - GNURadio block for suppressing IQ imbalance
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150666 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|gr-iqbal-0.37.2-3.fc21 |gr-iqbal-0.37.2-3.fc20 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- gr-iqbal-0.37.2-3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1156383] Review Request: sonar-update-center - Sonar Update Center
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156383 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||sonar-update-center-1.12.1- ||2.fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-11-15 04:19:44 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- sonar-update-center-1.12.1-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146933] Review Request: fontdump - Dump the CSS and different formats offonts for Google Fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146933 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|fontdump-1.2.1-1.fc21 |fontdump-1.2.1-1.fc20 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- fontdump-1.2.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146932] Review Request: python-fontname - A lib for guessing font name
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146932 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-fontname-0.2.0-2.fc2 |python-fontname-0.2.0-2.fc1 |1 |9 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-fontname-0.2.0-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146932] Review Request: python-fontname - A lib for guessing font name
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146932 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-fontname-0.2.0-2.fc1 |python-fontname-0.2.0-2.fc2 |9 |0 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-fontname-0.2.0-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146933] Review Request: fontdump - Dump the CSS and different formats offonts for Google Fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146933 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|fontdump-1.2.1-1.fc20 |fontdump-1.2.1-1.fc19 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- fontdump-1.2.1-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1009247] Review Request: minimodem - General-purpose software audio FSK modem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009247 Ricky Elrod rel...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Ricky Elrod rel...@redhat.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: minimodem New Branches: epel7 Owners: kg4sgp codeblock -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 831895] Review Request: cloc - Count Lines of Code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831895 Ricky Elrod rel...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Ricky Elrod rel...@redhat.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: cloc New Branches: epel7 Owners: codeblock -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 831895] Review Request: cloc - Count Lines of Code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831895 Ricky Elrod rel...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamieli...@fedoraproject.or ||g --- Comment #22 from Ricky Elrod rel...@redhat.com --- *** Bug 1164371 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Net-CIDR New Branches: epel7 Owners: pghmcfc InitialCC: perl-sig Nicolas is ok with me taking the EPEL branch: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163610#c4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1155793] Review Request: Hyperrogue - An SDL roguelike in a non-euclidean world
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793 --- Comment #5 from nobra...@gmail.com --- Hi, I moved the Spec and the SRPM to fedorapeople.org Spec URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue.spec SRPM URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue-4.4-3.fc21.src.rpm I also ran a scratch build in rawhide, and hyperrogue builded sucessfully in all architectures. results here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8151067 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1155793] Review Request: hyperrogue - An SDL roguelike in a non-euclidean world
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||i...@cicku.me
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|i...@cicku.me
Summary|Review Request: Hyperrogue |Review Request: hyperrogue
|- An SDL roguelike in a |- An SDL roguelike in a
|non-euclidean world |non-euclidean world
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Hi,
I just went through your spec and found some problems you have to fix.
1.
BuildRequires: SDL_mixer-devel SDL_ttf-devel SDL_gfx-devel
BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils
Requires: SDL_mixer SDL_ttf SDL_gfx
If linker works well, no need to explicitly Requires SDL_mixer SDL_ttf SDL_gfx.
2. Summary:An SDL rogue-like in a non-euclidean world
Arr... rogue-like or roguelike exactly?
3. # Upstream no provides the install target. I have to install files by
hand.
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/%{name}
cp -p hyper %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/%{name}/hyperrogue
cp -p *ogg %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/%{name}/
cp -p VeraBd.ttf %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/%{name}/
Although install target is unavailable, yours is not good.
These files should be put into %{_datadir}.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1155793] Review Request: hyperrogue - An SDL roguelike in a non-euclidean world
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #7 from nobra...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue.spec
SRPM URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue-4.4-4.fc21.src.rpm
Hi,
Thank you for your help :)
1. If linker works well, no need to explicitly Requires SDL_mixer SDL_ttf
SDL_gfx.
You're right, linker works very well. I fix it
2. Arr... rogue-like or roguelike exactly?
At the begining, I've wrote roguelike, but it generates this rpmlint warning:
spelling-error Summary(en_US) roguelike - rogue like, rogue-like, Rogelio
So, I changed it to rogue-like, but English is not my native language... It
really changes the meaning ?
3. Although install target is unavailable, yours is not good.
These files should be put into %{_datadir}.
As I explained it in the first comment, the arch-dependent binairie need to be
in the same directory as the font file. And put the executable it in
%{_datadir} generates this rpmlint warning:
arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/hyperrogue/hyperrogue
As suggested Rahul Sundaram, I change %{_datadir} to %{_libdir}
Alexandre
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1117961] Review Request: lua-msgpack - Lua binary-based efficient object serialization library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117961 Eduardo Mayorga e...@mayorgalinux.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||e...@mayorgalinux.com --- Comment #2 from Eduardo Mayorga e...@mayorgalinux.com --- Where is the license text? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1155210] Review Request: drumstick0 - C++/Qt4 wrapper around the ALSA library sequencer interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155210
Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|toms...@fedoraproject.org
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
- Why is there Conflicts: %{realname}-devel 0.5.0? Doesn't it also conflict
if it is any other version of the real-devel package?
- Large doc in -devel (this is a should, see below)
- Requires is missing an %{?_isa}
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
GPL (v2 or later), Unknown or generated. 1 files have unknown
license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/mime,
/usr/share/mime/packages
[!x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/include/drumstick
(drumstick-devel)
As this is a compat package for drumstick-devel, this is ignorable.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[!x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
Only expected conflicts
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[.]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
Note: Test run failed
[!]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
The devel package is ~2MB, because of html files. I'd leave that out as it is
enough to have them in the main drumstick-devel package.
This is a should only.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Note: Test run failed
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec
[Bug 872771] Review Request: qextserialport - Qt interface class for old fashioned serial ports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872771 Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davejohan...@gmail.com --- Comment #13 from Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: qextserialport New Branches: el6 epel7 Owners: dlj InitialCC: volter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164478] Review Request: nodejs-json-localizer - Utility to localize a JSON object
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164478 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164478] New: Review Request: nodejs-json-localizer - Utility to localize a JSON object
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164478 Bug ID: 1164478 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-json-localizer - Utility to localize a JSON object Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: t...@compton.nu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-json-localizer.spec SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-json-localizer-0.0.2-1.fc20.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: tomh Description: Utility to localize a JSON object from another JSON object or a simple API. Used when you need humans to localize a JSON object from a config file. Typical use case is for a local config file to extend an application config on the fly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164479] New: Review Request: nodejs-mapnik-pool - Manage a pool of mapnik instances
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164479 Bug ID: 1164479 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-mapnik-pool - Manage a pool of mapnik instances Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: t...@compton.nu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-mapnik-pool.spec SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-mapnik-pool-0.1.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: tomh Description: If you want to use node-mapnik in an app with concurrency, you'll want to use a map pool. Concurrently using a single map instance can crash your app, and several map instances will give you a significant speedup. mapnik-pool manages a generic-pool of mapnik.Map instances so you don't have to. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164479] Review Request: nodejs-mapnik-pool - Manage a pool of mapnik instances
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164479 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164481] Review Request: nodejs-utilities - A classic collection of JavaScript utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164481 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164481] New: Review Request: nodejs-utilities - A classic collection of JavaScript utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164481 Bug ID: 1164481 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-utilities - A classic collection of JavaScript utilities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: t...@compton.nu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-utilities.spec SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-utilities-1.0.4-1.fc20.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: tomh Description: A classic collection of JavaScript utilities. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164483] Review Request: nodejs-filelist - Lazy-evaluating list of files, based on globs or regexes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164483 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews) Depends On||1164481 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164481 [Bug 1164481] Review Request: nodejs-utilities - A classic collection of JavaScript utilities -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164481] Review Request: nodejs-utilities - A classic collection of JavaScript utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164481 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1164483 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164483 [Bug 1164483] Review Request: nodejs-filelist - Lazy-evaluating list of files, based on globs or regexes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164483] New: Review Request: nodejs-filelist - Lazy-evaluating list of files, based on globs or regexes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164483 Bug ID: 1164483 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-filelist - Lazy-evaluating list of files, based on globs or regexes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: t...@compton.nu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-filelist.spec SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-filelist-0.0.3-1.fc20.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: tomh Description: A FileList is a lazy-evaluated list of files. When given a list of glob patterns for possible files to be included in the file list, instead of searching the file structures to find the files, a FileList holds the pattern for latter use. This allows you to define a FileList to match any number of files, but only search out the actual files when then FileList itself is actually used. The key is that the first time an element of the FileList/Array is requested, the pending patterns are resolved into a real list of file names. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164481] Review Request: nodejs-utilities - A classic collection of JavaScript utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164481 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1164484 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164484 [Bug 1164484] Review Request: jake - Jake -- the JavaScript build tool for Node.js -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164484] New: Review Request: jake - Jake -- the JavaScript build tool for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164484 Bug ID: 1164484 Summary: Review Request: jake - Jake -- the JavaScript build tool for Node.js Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: t...@compton.nu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/jake.spec SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/jake-8.0.10-1.fc20.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: tomh Description: Jake is the JavaScript build tool for NodeJS. Jake has been around since the very early days of Node, and is very full featured and well tested. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164483] Review Request: nodejs-filelist - Lazy-evaluating list of files, based on globs or regexes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164483 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1164484 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164484 [Bug 1164484] Review Request: jake - Jake -- the JavaScript build tool for Node.js -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164484] Review Request: jake - Jake -- the JavaScript build tool for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164484 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews) Depends On||1164481, 1164483 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164481 [Bug 1164481] Review Request: nodejs-utilities - A classic collection of JavaScript utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164483 [Bug 1164483] Review Request: nodejs-filelist - Lazy-evaluating list of files, based on globs or regexes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164485] New: Review Request: nodejs-leaflet - An open source JavaScript Library for Interactive Maps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164485 Bug ID: 1164485 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-leaflet - An open source JavaScript Library for Interactive Maps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: t...@compton.nu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-leaflet.spec SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-leaflet-0.7.3-1.fc20.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: tomh Description: An open source JavaScript library for mobile-friendly interactive maps. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164484] Review Request: jake - Jake -- the JavaScript build tool for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164484 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1164485 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164485 [Bug 1164485] Review Request: nodejs-leaflet - An open source JavaScript Library for Interactive Maps -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164485] Review Request: nodejs-leaflet - An open source JavaScript Library for Interactive Maps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164485 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews) Depends On||1164484 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164484 [Bug 1164484] Review Request: jake - Jake -- the JavaScript build tool for Node.js -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164486] New: Review Request: nodejs-leaflet-formbuilder - Helpers to build forms in Leaflet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164486 Bug ID: 1164486 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-leaflet-formbuilder - Helpers to build forms in Leaflet Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: t...@compton.nu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-leaflet-formbuilder.spec SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-leaflet-formbuilder-0.0.6-1.fc20.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: tomh Description: Helpers to build forms in Leaflet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164485] Review Request: nodejs-leaflet - An open source JavaScript Library for Interactive Maps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164485 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1164486 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164486 [Bug 1164486] Review Request: nodejs-leaflet-formbuilder - Helpers to build forms in Leaflet -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164486] Review Request: nodejs-leaflet-formbuilder - Helpers to build forms in Leaflet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164486 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews) Depends On||1164485 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164485 [Bug 1164485] Review Request: nodejs-leaflet - An open source JavaScript Library for Interactive Maps -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164487] New: Review Request: nodejs-leaflet-hash - Linkable location hashes for leaflet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164487 Bug ID: 1164487 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-leaflet-hash - Linkable location hashes for leaflet Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: t...@compton.nu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-leaflet-hash.spec SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-leaflet-hash-0.2.1-1.fc20.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: tomh Description: Leaflet-hash lets you to add dynamic URL hashes to web pages with Leaflet maps. You can easily link users to specific map views. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164485] Review Request: nodejs-leaflet - An open source JavaScript Library for Interactive Maps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164485 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1164487 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164487 [Bug 1164487] Review Request: nodejs-leaflet-hash - Linkable location hashes for leaflet -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164487] Review Request: nodejs-leaflet-hash - Linkable location hashes for leaflet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164487 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews) Depends On||1164485 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164485 [Bug 1164485] Review Request: nodejs-leaflet - An open source JavaScript Library for Interactive Maps -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #11 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru --- $ rpm -qpl /home/taurus/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/qca-2.1.0-2.fc20.R.x86_64.rpm /usr/bin/mozcerts /usr/bin/qcatool /usr/lib64/libqca.so.2 /usr/lib64/libqca.so.2.1.0 It is bad idea to mix library and executable files. In this case I can't install on my system both qca.x86_64 and qca.i686 pacakges. Also mozcerts and qcatool not need for regular users. So this files should be moved to separate subpackes qca-tools for example or something like. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #12 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru --- I wonder is it OK that package doesn't provide libqca-2.1.so ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164496] New: Review Request: statsd - A simple, lightweight network daemon to collect metrics over UDP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164496 Bug ID: 1164496 Summary: Review Request: statsd - A simple, lightweight network daemon to collect metrics over UDP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: piotr1...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://vps533.directvps.nl/statsd.spec SRPM URL: http://vps533.directvps.nl/statsd-0.7.2-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: A simple, lightweight network daemon to collect metrics over UDP Fedora Account System Username: piotrp koji scratch rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8153984 koji scratch f21: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8153986 koji scratch f20: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8153988 koji scratch f19: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8153992 koji scratch epel7: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8153990 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 168190] Review Request: gpsim - A simulator for Microchip (TM) PIC (TM) microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168190 Roy Rankin rran...@ihug.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #13 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Re: comment #11 binaries should be ok, rpm uses binary coloring to prefer native binaries in this context. Not sure what you mean by comment #12 , the library soname is libqca.so.2 (not libqca-2-1.so) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1163666] Review Request: american-fuzzy-lop - Practical, instrumentation-driven fuzzer for binary formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163666 --- Comment #15 from Pádraig Brady pbr...@redhat.com --- You'll need version 0.48b that fixes https://code.google.com/p/american-fuzzy-lop/issues/detail?id=13 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #14 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru --- [root@lix lib64]# ll libQtCore.so.* lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 18 Nov 14 02:14 libQtCore.so.4 - libQtCore.so.4.8.6 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 18 Nov 14 02:14 libQtCore.so.4.8 - libQtCore.so.4.8.6 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3108864 Jul 24 00:32 libQtCore.so.4.8.6 [root@lix lib64]# ll libqca.so.* lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Nov 14 02:15 libqca.so.2 - libqca.so.2.0.3 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Nov 14 02:15 libqca.so.2.0 - libqca.so.2.0.3 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1154456 Aug 4 2013 libqca.so.2.0.3 In new qca no libqca.so.2.1 . There are only libqca.so.2 and libqca.so.2.1.0. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1163666] Review Request: american-fuzzy-lop - Practical, instrumentation-driven fuzzer for binary formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163666 --- Comment #16 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com --- Spec URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/afl/american-fuzzy-lop.spec SRPM URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/afl/american-fuzzy-lop-0.48b-1.fc21.src.rpm * Sat Nov 15 2014 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 0.48b-1 - New upstream version 0.48b. - Fix: https://code.google.com/p/american-fuzzy-lop/issues/detail?id=13 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #15 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru --- (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #13) Re: comment #11 binaries should be ok, rpm uses binary coloring to prefer native binaries in this context. Yes. I checked it. No any problems. I installed both qca.i686 and qca.x86_64 # rpm -qa | grep qca qca-devel-2.1.0-2.fc20.i686 qca-2.1.0-2.fc20.x86_64 qca-ossl-2.1.0-2.fc20.x86_64 qca-devel-2.1.0-2.fc20.x86_64 qca-gnupg-2.1.0-2.fc20.x86_64 qca-2.1.0-2.fc20.i686 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1157908] Review Request: calamares - Installer from a live CD/DVD/USB to disk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157908 Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-11-15 21:41:43 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1155210] Review Request: drumstick0 - C++/Qt4 wrapper around the ALSA library sequencer interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155210
--- Comment #12 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Thomas Spura from comment #11)
Issues:
- Why is there Conflicts: %{realname}-devel 0.5.0? Doesn't it also
conflict if it is any other version of the real-devel package?
Fixed.
- Large doc in -devel (this is a should, see below)
I will prefer not to change this for a compat package.
- Requires is missing an %{?_isa}
Fixed
Spec URL: http://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/drumstick0.spec
SRPM URL: http://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/drumstick0-0.5.0-13.fc21.src.rpm
Changes:
- Removed conflicts versioning of devel subpackage
- Specified Requires of devel subpackage
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 586473] Review Request: mg - Tiny Emacs-like editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586473 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|mg-20140414-2.el7 |mg-20141007-1.el7 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mg-20141007-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1158040] Review Request: php-react-promise - A lightweight implementation of CommonJS Promises/A for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158040 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|php-react-promise-2.1.0-1.f |php-react-promise-2.1.0-1.e |c21 |l7 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-react-promise-2.1.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590305] Review Request: vile - VI Like Emacs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590305 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|vile-9.8d-3.fc13|vile-9.8o-1.el7 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- vile-9.8o-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1163666] Review Request: american-fuzzy-lop - Practical, instrumentation-driven fuzzer for binary formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163666 --- Comment #17 from Pádraig Brady pbr...@redhat.com --- Versions coming thick and fast. Up to 0.50b now :/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
