[Bug 895077] Review Request: python-docopt - Pythonic argument parser, that will make you smile
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895077 Martin Sivák msi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Martin Sivák msi...@redhat.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-docopt New Branches: el6 Owners: msivak miminar InitialCC: There is a request for docopt on CentOS 6 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194598 I think it is not a bad idea. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194184] Review Request: perl-Perl4-CoreLibs - Libraries historically supplied with Perl 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194184 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- You shouldn't need File::Find, Socket, or warnings::register BRs. These appear to be only used by scripts which aren't tested -- find.pl and finddepth.pl for File::Find, and syslog.pl for Socket and warnings::register. Suggestion: Follow English rules when sorting stuff. No review blockers, approving. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194184] Review Request: perl-Perl4-CoreLibs - Libraries historically supplied with Perl 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194184 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Perl4-CoreLibs Short Description: Libraries historically supplied with Perl 4 Upstream URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Perl4-CoreLibs/ Owners: ppisar jplesnik psabata Branches: f20 f21 f22 InitialCC: perl-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194576] New: Review Request:python-docx - Lib for creating/updating docx files [FE-NEEDSPONSOR]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194576 Bug ID: 1194576 Summary: Review Request:python-docx - Lib for creating/updating docx files [FE-NEEDSPONSOR] Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: kushal...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://kushal124.fedorapeople.org/python-docx.spec SRPM URL: https://kushal124.fedorapeople.org/python-docx-0.8.2-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Python library for creating and updating Microsoft Word (.docx) files. Fedora Account System Username: kushal124 Koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9003516 This is my first package and I need sponsor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 902086] Review request: Elasticsearch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086 --- Comment #128 from jiri vanek jva...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #127) Created attachment 993789 [details] elasticsearch.service - move Description to the right section - add Documentation, ProtectHome, ProtectSystem, User, LimitNOFILE It seems to have missing User=elasticsearch Group=elasticsearch I will add it to it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194032] Review Request: perl-Math-Int64 - Manipulate 64 bits integers in Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194032 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- Ack, approving. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194187] Review Request: libuecc - Very small Elliptic Curve Cryptography library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194187 Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libuecc Short Description: Very small Elliptic Curve Cryptography library Upstream URL: http://git.universe-factory.net/libuecc Owners: heffer Branches: f20 f21 f22 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194187] Review Request: libuecc - Very small Elliptic Curve Cryptography library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194187 --- Comment #2 from Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org --- Thank your for this review. I have changed the %doc tag to %license here: SPEC: https://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/libuecc/libuecc.spec SRPM: https://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/libuecc/libuecc-5-2.fc21.src.rpm This is the version I will commit then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194184] Review Request: perl-Perl4-CoreLibs - Libraries historically supplied with Perl 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194184 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1191212] Review Request: nodejs-cli-table - Pretty unicode tables for the CLI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191212
--- Comment #4 from Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com ---
Hi Ralph,
npm(expresso) is provided by expresso:
$ dnf whatprovides 'npm(expresso)'
expresso-0.9.2-6.fc21.noarch
The npm download does not contain the tests, to enable the test you could fetch
the source from github. (I actually use github as Source0 by default now for
node modules as many npm downloads miss license files and tests).
Github sources:
Source0:
https://github.com/Automattic/%{barename}/archive/%{version}/%{barename}-%{version}.tar.gz
%setup -q -n %{barename}-%{version}
The tests fail:
uncaught undefined: Error: Cannot find module 'colors/safe'
It seems that colors/save.js appeared in colors 1.0.0 for the first time. This
module will not work with nodejs-colors-0.6.2 which is in Fedora.
To have this module working in Fedora we would need to upgrade nodejs-colors or
multiversion nodejs-colors:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Node.js?rd=Node.js/Packagers#Handling_Multiple_Version_Scenarios
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1190728] Review Request: forbidden-apis - Checks Java byte code against a list of forbidden API signatures.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190728 zzamb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2015-02-20 07:09:27 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1190733] Review Request: mycila-licenses - Licenses used in Mycila projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190733 zzamb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2015-02-20 07:09:56 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 902086] Review request: Elasticsearch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086 --- Comment #130 from jiri vanek jva...@redhat.com --- Also note, deadline is 24th Feb, so we should push and build today, or in Monday as latest -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 722807] Review Request: python-bottle - Fast and simple WSGI-framework for small web-applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722807 Michel Samia msa...@netsuite.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msa...@netsuite.com --- Comment #4 from Michel Samia msa...@netsuite.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-bottle New Branches: el6 Owners: stardust85 InitialCC: Hi, Rahul Sundaram agreed that I can maintain el6 branch for his package. So please create the branch. Thanks, Michel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 722807] Review Request: python-bottle - Fast and simple WSGI-framework for small web-applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722807 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msu...@redhat.com Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194576] Review Request:python-docx - Lib for creating/updating docx files [FE-NEEDSPONSOR]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194576 Kushal kushal...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||100 (ML-SIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=100 [Bug 100] Machine Learning SIG - review tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194628] New: Review Request: perl-Module-Metadata-Changes - Manage a module's machine-readable Changes/CHANGES file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194628 Bug ID: 1194628 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Metadata-Changes - Manage a module's machine-readable Changes/CHANGES file Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Module-Metadata-Changes/perl-Module-Metadata-Changes.spec SRPM URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Module-Metadata-Changes/perl-Module-Metadata-Changes-2.05-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: Module::Metadata::Changes is a pure Perl module. It allows you to convert old-style Changes/CHANGES files, and to read and write Changelog.ini files. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 902086] Review request: Elasticsearch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086 --- Comment #129 from jiri vanek jva...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #126) So... this is starting to look good. Add BR and R: java-base64 = 2.3.8-7 Why this: Requires(post): chkconfig Requires(preun): chkconfig removed. I found in in some example.. Change systemd-units to systemd in the requirements. changed. Still valid: - %description needs to be extended to say what this package does. The new text seems to have been pasted from a website. It's a promotional blurb. It even ends with Learn more. Please add something more technical. Improved by paragraph from wikipedia s/distributive search and analytic/distributed search and analytics/ done The daemon creates /data/elasticsearch. It should use /var/lib/elasticsearch instead. used [1] The daemon should run under its own user. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UsersAndGroups#Dynamic_allocation for the setup. /var/lib/elasticsearch has to be owned by this user. good catch! done. The user is never removed? directory also owned. Updated service file in attachment. used with small sync from upstream service (https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/elasticsearch/review/v6/elasticsearch.service.in) [1] This needed some rework. I had to get rid of %jpackage_script and use elasticsearch.in to This script is redirecting ES work to /var/lib/elasticsearch (in case of service) and to XDG_CONFIG_HOME in case od regular user's run My motivation is, that users data definitely should be separate from service's data. If one can use global data as default, he can always symlink. see: https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/elasticsearch/review/v6/elasticsearch.in SPEC: https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/elasticsearch/review/v6/elasticsearch.spec SRPM: https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/elasticsearch/review/v6/elasticsearch-1.4.3-0.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194628] Review Request: perl-Module-Metadata-Changes - Manage a module's machine-readable Changes/CHANGES file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194628 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 458011] Review Request: ms-sys - Create DOS/MS-compatible boot records
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458011 --- Comment #21 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org --- Actually, is ms-sys-free really Free (or even legally redistributable)? I'm not convinced, seeing how e.g.: http://sourceforge.net/p/ms-sys-free/code/ci/master/tree/inc/br_fat32fd_0x52.h says: /* br_fat32_0x52.h // // ANI // substring gmbh/tw 14.9.04 // modified bootstrap code 0x052 to support FreeDOS so it looks like this doesn't actually come from the FreeDOS project, but is a derivative work of the proprietary hexdump. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 458011] Review Request: ms-sys - Create DOS/MS-compatible boot records
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458011 Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CANTFIX -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1189460] Review Request: dock - Improved builder for Docker images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189460 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1189460] Review Request: dock - Improved builder for Docker images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189460 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- dock-1.1.0-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dock-1.1.0-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 902086] Review request: Elasticsearch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086 jiri vanek jva...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1190733] Review Request: mycila-licenses - Licenses used in Mycila projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190733 zzamb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1190728] Review Request: forbidden-apis - Checks Java byte code against a list of forbidden API signatures.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190728 zzamb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 895077] Review Request: python-docopt - Pythonic argument parser, that will make you smile
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895077 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 895077] Review Request: python-docopt - Pythonic argument parser, that will make you smile
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895077 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1174974] Review Request: python-mox3 - Mock object framework for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174974 Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com --- Thanks. As it seems, I might not need this package after all (meybe). So I'm changing this to NotReady and will eventually either close it or continue by fixing it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 722807] Review Request: python-bottle - Fast and simple WSGI-framework for small web-applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722807 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 722807] Review Request: python-bottle - Fast and simple WSGI-framework for small web-applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722807 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194184] Review Request: perl-Perl4-CoreLibs - Libraries historically supplied with Perl 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194184 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194187] Review Request: libuecc - Very small Elliptic Curve Cryptography library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194187 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194187] Review Request: libuecc - Very small Elliptic Curve Cryptography library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194187 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194628] Review Request: perl-Module-Metadata-Changes - Manage a module's machine-readable Changes/CHANGES file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194628
--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
Note: All the patched files are read-only. I assume the patching could fail,
even though it currently doesn't. Perhaps making them writable before patching
would be a good idea.
Ad Patch1 -- according to Web Assets guidelines, Fedora webservers provide
%{_webassetdir} in `/_sysassets', not `/.sysassets'. Please, correct the
patch.
Consider bumping the minimum required version of EU::MM to 6.76 and using
NO_PACKLIST to simplify the SPEC.
The convert.t test doesn't actually convert anything. Maybe you could enhance
it a bit? However, that's beyond the scope of this review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194225] Review Request: python-XStatic-termjs - term.js (XStatic packaging standard)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194225 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-XStatic-termjs-0.0.4.2-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1177038] Review Request: qt5-qtwebsockets - Qt5 - WebSockets component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177038 --- Comment #9 from Taylor Braun-Jones tay...@braun-jones.org --- Thanks, Rex. Do you mind if I list you as a secondary owner for this package? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1177038] Review Request: qt5-qtwebsockets - Qt5 - WebSockets component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177038 --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Please do, thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194911] New: Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-args - Grunt util for extracting arguments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194911 Bug ID: 1194911 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-args - Grunt util for extracting arguments Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: piotr1...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-grunt-util-args.spec SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-grunt-util-args-0.0.3-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Grunt util for extracting arguments Fedora Account System Username: piotrp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194916] New: Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-process - Grunt util for processing values in an object
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194916 Bug ID: 1194916 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-process - Grunt util for processing values in an object Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: piotr1...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-grunt-util-process.spec SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-grunt-util-process-0.0.1-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Grunt util for processing values in an object Fedora Account System Username: piotrp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1107800] Review Request: dl_poly - General purpose classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107800 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- dl_poly-1.9.20140324-9.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1177038] Review Request: qt5-qtwebsockets - Qt5 - WebSockets component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177038 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- sponsored, please let me know if you need anything else. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194923] Review Request: nodejs-ava - Simple test runner
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194923 Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1194925 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194925 [Bug 1194925] Review Request: nodejs-log-symbols - Colored symbols for various log levels -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194925] Review Request: nodejs-log-symbols - Colored symbols for various log levels
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194925 Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1194923 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194923 [Bug 1194923] Review Request: nodejs-ava - Simple test runner -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194926] New: Review Request: nodejs-set-immediate-shim - Simple setImmediate shim
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194926 Bug ID: 1194926 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-set-immediate-shim - Simple setImmediate shim Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: piotr1...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-set-immediate-shim.spec SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-set-immediate-shim-1.0.0-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Simple setImmediate shim Fedora Account System Username: piotrp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1177038] Review Request: qt5-qtwebsockets - Qt5 - WebSockets component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177038 Taylor Braun-Jones tay...@braun-jones.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186503] Review Request: openclonk - Fast-paced 2d genre mix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186503
--- Comment #7 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
new rpm package:
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/openclonk.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/openclonk-5.5.1-3.fc21.src.rpm
%changelog
* Fri Feb 20 2015 Martin Gansser marti...@fedoraproject.org - 5.5.1-3
- corrected requirements to pkgconfig(xml2po)
- deleted Requieres from sub package
- added Requires to main package
- added html desktop files
- replaced tabs by space
- added RR xdg-utils to docs package
- added %%{?_smp_mflags} flag to html make
- added png file to devel-docs package
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194923] New: Review Request: nodejs-ava - Simple test runner
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194923 Bug ID: 1194923 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-ava - Simple test runner Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: piotr1...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-ava.spec SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-ava-0.0.4-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Simple test runner Fedora Account System Username: piotrp nodejs-ava, nodejs-log-symbols, nodejs-set-immediate-shim and nodejs-each-async depend on each other (circular). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194798] Review Request: GeoIP-GeoLite-data - Free GeoLite IP geolocation country database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194798 --- Comment #2 from Philip Prindeville phil...@redfish-solutions.com --- (In reply to Philip Prindeville from comment #1) So we just rebuild it and bump the Version field every month? Or are we still suggesting everyone use the geoipupdate-cron* subpackages? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194897] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-propery - Grunt util for getting and setting properties
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194897 Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1194902 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194902 [Bug 1194902] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-options - Grunt util for getting options -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194902] New: Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-options - Grunt util for getting options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194902 Bug ID: 1194902 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-options - Grunt util for getting options Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: piotr1...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-grunt-util-options.spec SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-grunt-util-options-0.0.2-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Grunt util for getting options Fedora Account System Username: piotrp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194902] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-options - Grunt util for getting options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194902 Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1194897 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194897 [Bug 1194897] Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-propery - Grunt util for getting and setting properties -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194931] New: Review Request: nodejs-each-async - Async concurrent iterator (async forEach)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194931 Bug ID: 1194931 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-each-async - Async concurrent iterator (async forEach) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: piotr1...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-each-async.spec SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-each-async-1.1.1-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Async concurrent iterator (async forEach) Fedora Account System Username: piotrp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194897] New: Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-propery - Grunt util for getting and setting properties
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194897 Bug ID: 1194897 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-grunt-util-propery - Grunt util for getting and setting properties Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: piotr1...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-grunt-util-property.spec SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-grunt-util-property-0.0.1-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Grunt util for getting and setting properties Fedora Account System Username: piotrp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194926] Review Request: nodejs-set-immediate-shim - Simple setImmediate shim
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194926 Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1194931 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194931 [Bug 1194931] Review Request: nodejs-each-async - Async concurrent iterator (async forEach) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194931] Review Request: nodejs-each-async - Async concurrent iterator (async forEach)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194931 Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1194927, 1194926 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194926 [Bug 1194926] Review Request: nodejs-set-immediate-shim - Simple setImmediate shim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194927 [Bug 1194927] Review Request: nodejs-onetime - Only call a function once -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194927] Review Request: nodejs-onetime - Only call a function once
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194927 Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1194931 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194931 [Bug 1194931] Review Request: nodejs-each-async - Async concurrent iterator (async forEach) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1183193] Review Request: ceres-solver - A non-linear least squares minimizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183193 Taylor Braun-Jones tay...@braun-jones.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194927] New: Review Request: nodejs-onetime - Only call a function once
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194927 Bug ID: 1194927 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-onetime - Only call a function once Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: piotr1...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-onetime.spec SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-onetime-1.0.0-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Only call a function once Fedora Account System Username: piotrp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1188093] Review Request: qtile - A pure-Python tiling window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188093 John Dulaney jdula...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1191544 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191544 [Bug 1191544] qtile -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1147743] Review Request: python-nose-cov - nose plugin for coverage reporting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147743 John Dulaney jdula...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2015-02-20 20:37:31 --- Comment #18 from John Dulaney jdula...@fedoraproject.org --- Stable -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194950] New: Review Request: nodejs-window-size - Get the height and width of the terminal in a node.js environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194950 Bug ID: 1194950 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-window-size - Get the height and width of the terminal in a node.js environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rb...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://ralph.fedorapeople.org//nodejs-window-size.spec SRPM URL: http://ralph.fedorapeople.org//nodejs-window-size-0.1.0-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Reliable way to to get the height and width of the terminal/console in a node.js environment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194950] Review Request: nodejs-window-size - Get the height and width of the terminal in a node.js environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194950 --- Comment #1 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- This package built on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9009301 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194576] Review Request:python-docx - Lib for creating/updating docx files [FE-NEEDSPONSOR]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194576 Kushal kushal...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194545] Review Request: python-cached-property - A cached-property for decorating methods in Python classes.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194545
Adam Williamson (Red Hat) awill...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||awill...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Adam Williamson (Red Hat) awill...@redhat.com ---
you don't need to define sitearch, and it's 'good practice' to make
sitelib/sitearch definition conditional on old EL and version specific:
%if 0%{?rhel} 0%{?rhel} = 6
%{!?python2_sitelib: %global python2_sitelib %(%{__python2} -c from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib()))}
%endif
then use python2_sitelib not python_sitelib (this is all from
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python ).
The packaging guidelines require using commit-based tarballs when using
github-generated sources, not versions:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Github
that can be a bit tricky to read, but yes, it really does mean you should use a
tarball derived from a commit hash even for stable releases, unless upstream
provides tarballs in some way *other* than github's generation system. The
justification is that commit hashes are less mutable and thus more predictable,
so we should take advantage of that when we can. You can still version the
package as 1.0.0-1 , but the Source0 URL should use a commit hash. See
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/php-google-apiclient.git/tree/php-google-apiclient.spec
for an example.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194576] Review Request:python-docx - Lib for creating/updating docx files [FE-NEEDSPONSOR]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194576 --- Comment #1 from Kushal kushal...@gmail.com --- Updated the spec file to fix tests. New koji build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9009221 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1189460] Review Request: dock - Improved builder for Docker images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189460 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- dock-1.1.0-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1122176] Review Request: kubernetes - Kubernetes container management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122176 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|kubernetes-0.9.1-0.2.git362 |kubernetes-0.9.1-0.2.git362 |3a01.fc21 |3a01.fc20 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- kubernetes-0.9.1-0.2.git3623a01.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1122176] Review Request: kubernetes - Kubernetes container management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122176 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|kubernetes-0.6-4.0.git993ef |kubernetes-0.9.1-0.2.git362 |88.fc20 |3a01.fc21 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- kubernetes-0.9.1-0.2.git3623a01.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194184] Review Request: perl-Perl4-CoreLibs - Libraries historically supplied with Perl 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194184 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Perl4-CoreLibs-0.003-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1177406] Review Request: csvcat - Efficiently concatenate CSVs or other tabular text files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177406 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||csvcat-0.1-20141205git858ed ||fe.fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-02-20 23:23:16 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- csvcat-0.1-20141205git858edfe.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1188093] Review Request: qtile - A pure-Python tiling window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188093 --- Comment #15 from John Dulaney jdula...@fedoraproject.org --- Beuler? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194545] Review Request: python-cached-property - A cached-property for decorating methods in Python classes.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194545 --- Comment #2 from Pete Travis m...@petetravis.com --- Thanks for the thorough explanation, Adam. I've made the suggested changes, and a few more minor ones after reviewing rpmlint and the python guidelines again. Were you envisioning this package in EPEL, or is the conditional only for best practices? Also, I'm wavering on the package name - python-cached-property to match the upstream project, or python-cached_property to match the module. Leaning towards the latter - any thoughts? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194184] Review Request: perl-Perl4-CoreLibs - Libraries historically supplied with Perl 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194184 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-Perl4-CoreLibs-0.003-1 ||.fc23 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194058] Review Request: atomic - Tool for managing ProjectAtomic systems and containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194058 Colin Walters walt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||walt...@redhat.com Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Colin Walters walt...@redhat.com --- Ok, the latest fedora-review is giving me errors on RHEL7, so not pasting that. However, we changed license upstream to LGPLv2+, can you update the spec file too? See https://github.com/projectatomic/atomic/issues/21 With that change, LGTM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194028] Review Request: python-jwt - JSON Web Token implementation in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194028 --- Comment #3 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- As for the tests... I just got them included in the tarball today. https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt/pull/95 :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1191212] Review Request: nodejs-cli-table - Pretty unicode tables for the CLI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191212
--- Comment #6 from Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com ---
just upgrading nodejs-colors will break all packages which depend on it... see
below, all nodejs-colors dependents depend on 1
for line in $(repoquery --whatrequires 'npm(colors)'); do
echo ${line}:
repoquery -R ${line} | grep colors;
echo
done
nodejs-dtree-0:0.0.7-1.fc21.noarch:
npm(colors) 0.7
npm(colors) = 0.6.2
nodejs-grunt-0:0.4.4-4.fc21.noarch:
npm(colors) 1
npm(colors) = 0.6
nodejs-grunt-html-validation-0:0.1.18-2.fc21.noarch:
npm(colors)
npm(colors) 0.7
npm(colors) = 0.6.0
nodejs-grunt-init-0:0.3.1-2.fc21.noarch:
npm(colors) 1
npm(colors) = 0.6
nodejs-grunt-saucelabs-0:8.3.3-1.fc21.noarch:
npm(colors) 0.7
npm(colors) = 0.6.2
nodejs-node-static-0:0.7.3-2.fc21.noarch:
npm(colors) = 0.6.0
nodejs-replace-0:0.3.0-2.fc21.noarch:
npm(colors)
nodejs-winston-0:0.7.3-2.fc21.noarch:
npm(colors) 0.7
npm(colors) = 0.6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1191212] Review Request: nodejs-cli-table - Pretty unicode tables for the CLI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191212 --- Comment #5 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- Let's wait to upgrade nodejs-colors. I just requested commit access to help with updating it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1191212] Review Request: nodejs-cli-table - Pretty unicode tables for the CLI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191212 --- Comment #7 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- What a mess. We'll need to file bugs on each of those asking the maintainers to update in rawhide, I suppose. (or, multi-version like you were suggesting). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194184] Review Request: perl-Perl4-CoreLibs - Libraries historically supplied with Perl 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194184 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Perl4-CoreLibs-0.003-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Perl4-CoreLibs-0.003-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194184] Review Request: perl-Perl4-CoreLibs - Libraries historically supplied with Perl 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194184 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Perl4-CoreLibs-0.003-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Perl4-CoreLibs-0.003-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194058] Review Request: atomic - Tool for managing ProjectAtomic systems and containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194058 --- Comment #6 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com --- Trouble with github urls sorry. Reverting to fedorapeople urls: Spec URL: https://lsm5.fedorapeople.org/atomic/atomic.spec SRPM URL: https://lsm5.fedorapeople.org/atomic/SRPMS/atomic-0-0.3.gite4081c9.fc23.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194028] Review Request: python-jwt - JSON Web Token implementation in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194028 --- Comment #4 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- New release here, addressing your concerns, except: - The tests should show up in the next release. - I like shipping python2 and python3 versions of the executables for the purists out there that want to run python3-only everything. :) Other packages do this (in some cases its necessary like with nosetests-3.4 and coverage, other cases not, like python3-ansi2html). Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9006048 Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/SPECS/python-jwt.spec SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/SRPMS/python-jwt-0.4.3-1.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1191212] Review Request: nodejs-cli-table - Pretty unicode tables for the CLI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191212 --- Comment #8 from Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com --- just sent a mail to nodejs sig mailing list for help on this https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/nodejs/2015-February/000171.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1193730] Review Request: apache-jena - Java framework for building Semantic Web and Linked Data applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193730 --- Comment #1 from Donald Pellegrino dapellegr...@dow.com --- Note that the .spec file should be named apache-jena.spec to prevent a warning from rpmlint on the resulting SRPM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1183193] Review Request: ceres-solver - A non-linear least squares minimizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183193 --- Comment #2 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1) I think I'd submitted this long time ago, although I didn't update it, see bug 1128662. Only one review please. Which one? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 837840] Bug for testing SCM requests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837840 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 837840] Bug for testing SCM requests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837840 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194058] Review Request: atomic - Tool for managing ProjectAtomic systems and containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194058 Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: atomic Short Description: Tool for managing ProjectAtomic systems and containers Upstream URL: https://github.com/projectatomic/atomic Owners: lsm5 walters Branches: f22 f21 f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 837840] Bug for testing SCM requests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837840 Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||puiterw...@redhat.com Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1192969] Review Request: python-hardware - Hardware detection and classification utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192969
Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
Package approved.
---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
Note: Cannot find LICENSE in rpm(s)
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Apache (v2.0), Unknown or generated, *No copyright* Apache (v2.0).
2 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/sagitter/1192969-python-hardware/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
Note: Test run failed
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Test run failed
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Note: Test run failed
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
Python:
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
python3-hardware , python-hardware-doc
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
[Bug 837840] Bug for testing SCM requests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837840 Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: stupid-package Short Description: Some testing package Upstream URL: https://fedoraproject.org/ Owners: puiterwijk Branches: f22 f21 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194058] Review Request: atomic - Tool for managing ProjectAtomic systems and containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194058 --- Comment #8 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com --- fedora-review seems to work fine on fedora rawhide though. but nvm, thanks for the review, here's the updates: %changelog * Fri Feb 20 2015 Lokesh Mandvekar l...@fedoraproject.org - 0-0.4.gitf7f6fa8 - Resolves: rhbz#1194058 - approved version, ready for upload - change license to LGPLv2+ Spec URL: https://lsm5.fedorapeople.org/atomic/atomic.spec SRPM URL: https://lsm5.fedorapeople.org/atomic/SRPMS/atomic-0-0.4.gitf7f6fa8.fc23.src.rpm scm request follows -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 837840] Bug for testing SCM requests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837840 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1192969] Review Request: python-hardware - Hardware detection and classification utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192969 Dmitry Tantsur dtant...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dtant...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Tantsur dtant...@redhat.com --- Thanks for review, update files. I've dropped tests from packaging, as it will introduce unnecessary dependencies, especially critical as this package will be used on ramdisks. Please let me know if it works for you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1107800] Review Request: dl_poly - General purpose classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107800 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- dl_poly-1.9.20140324-9.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dl_poly-1.9.20140324-9.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665733] Review Request: Coin3 - High-level 3D visualization library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665733 --- Comment #26 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de --- (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #25) Likely I'll revisit my packaging and publish updated versions later this week. Sorry, took a little longer than a week to get back to it: New versions: Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/Coin3.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/Coin3-3.1.5-1.fc23.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 665733] Review Request: Coin3 - High-level 3D visualization library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665733 --- Comment #27 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de --- (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #26) (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #25) Likely I'll revisit my packaging and publish updated versions later this week. Sorry, took a little longer than a week to get back to it: New versions: Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/Coin3.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/Coin3-3.1.5-1.fc23.src.rpm Oops, typo: Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/Coin3.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/Coin3-3.1.3-5.fc23.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194798] Review Request: GeoIP-GeoLite-data - Free GeoLite IP geolocation country database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194798 Philip Prindeville phil...@redfish-solutions.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||philipp@redfish-solutions.c ||om --- Comment #1 from Philip Prindeville phil...@redfish-solutions.com --- So we just rebuild it and bump the Version field every month? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194925] New: Review Request: nodejs-log-symbols - Colored symbols for various log levels
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194925 Bug ID: 1194925 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-log-symbols - Colored symbols for various log levels Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: piotr1...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-log-symbols.spec SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-log-symbols-1.0.1-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Colored symbols for various log levels Fedora Account System Username: piotrp nodejs-ava, nodejs-log-symbols, nodejs-set-immediate-shim and nodejs-each-async depend on each other (circular). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
