[Bug 1352972] Review Request: python-twine - Collection of utilities for interacting with PyPI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352972 William Morenochanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from William Moreno --- Looks good, package aproved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1310368] review request: rubygem-jekyll - A simple, blog aware, static site generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310368 Dennis Chenchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||barracks...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Dennis Chen --- This isn't a review request. Each one of those packages needs to undergo it's own package review. I'll be happy to sponsor you and review each one of the individual packages, but please file a separate package review for each of the dependencies and link them to this bugzilla for easy tracking. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1208911] Review Request: doublecmd - Twin-panel (commander-style) file manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911 Bug 1208911 depends on bug 1247925, which changed state. Bug 1247925 Summary: add ppc64le and aarch64 support for fpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247925 What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Resolution|EOL |--- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1269056] Review Request: php-pecl-mongodb - MongoDB driver for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269056 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System--- php-pecl-mongodb-1.1.8-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b855865eef -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1269056] Review Request: php-pecl-mongodb - MongoDB driver for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269056 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System--- php-pecl-mongodb-1.1.8-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e331dcb6c7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1269056] Review Request: php-pecl-mongodb - MongoDB driver for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269056 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- php-pecl-mongodb-1.1.8-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-539597afca -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1351092] Review Request: python-geoip2 - MaxMind GeoIP2 API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351092 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System--- python-geoip2-2.4.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1344115] Review Request: winetricks - Work around common problems in Wine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344115 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System--- winetricks-20160709-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1325378] Review Request: spasm-ng - A z80 assembler with extra features for TI calculators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325378 --- Comment #1 from Ben Rosser--- Having thought about the include file situation further... I believe they probably should be removed from the package: Their authorship and copyright is difficult to assert (most of the community written files are not licensed, and ti83plus.inc was originally written by TI and then heavily modified), most authors of TI calculator assembly projects bundle them with their code anyway, and spasm does not expect include files to be available system-wide to begin with. The AUR package for Arch makes a similar decision and does not include them. I have also realized the package was not being built with system-wide ldflags, so I fixed that and reuploaded the package. Spec URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/spasm/spasm-ng.spec SRPM URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/spasm/spasm-ng-0.5-0.3.beta.2.fc23.src.rpm I believe it is now ready for review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825 Ben Rosserchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Ben Rosser --- Issues == * Version 1.3.1 seems to be available: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/lightbeam/; can you update the package, and I'll re-review? * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kalev/MozillaExtensionsDraft#Sample_Spec_File seems to sugggest that XPIs should be unpacked? I'm assuming that's no longer the case because of extension signing? * This is very minor, but rpmlint is unhappy that your bundled font provides are not versioned. The versioning information can be acquired by unzipping the XPI and running ttname -a over the font files. It'd probably be nice to include that information, though I wouldn't consider it a blocker for review. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD (3 clause)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "*No copyright* MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* MPL (v2.0)". 5 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bjr/Programming/fedora/reviews/1082825-mozilla- lightbeam/licensecheck.txt [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/mozilla/extensions/{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}, /usr/share/mozilla/extensions/{92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a} [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local = SHOULD items = Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream,
[Bug 1328868] Review Request: presto - Distributed SQL query engine for big data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328868 Bug 1328868 depends on bug 1277450, which changed state. Bug 1277450 Summary: libsvm(-java) remove versioned jars from %{_javadir} https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277450 What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Resolution|EOL |--- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1223774] Review Request: rubygem-aes - An AES encrypt/ decrypt gem built ontop of OpenSSL.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223774 Igor Gnatenkochanged: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Version|22 |rawhide Resolution|EOL |--- Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko --- Something what should not be closed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1223777] Review Request: rubygem-digest-tiger - A Digest module implementing the Tiger hashing algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223777 Igor Gnatenkochanged: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Version|22 |rawhide Resolution|EOL |--- Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko --- Something what should not be closed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1223780] Review Request: rubygem-twofish - Twofish symmetric cipher in pure Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223780 Igor Gnatenkochanged: What|Removed |Added Version|22 |rawhide --- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko --- Something what should not be closed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1318814] Review Request: burp2 - Network backup / restore program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318814 Igor Gnatenkochanged: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Version|22 |rawhide Resolution|EOL |--- Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #5 from Igor Gnatenko --- well, it was not reviewed/pushed, so reopening -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1351041] Review Request: mlt - A multimedia framework designed for television broadcasting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351041 --- Comment #11 from Sergio Monteiro Basto--- No, we need open mlt-freeworld package review , but just for f25/rawhide ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1050744] Review Request: belle-sip - Linphone SIP stack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744 --- Comment #46 from Orion Poplawski--- Well, yeah. They are different function with different arguments. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1244658] Review Request: dgit - Integration between git and Debian-style archives
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244658 Igor Gnatenkochanged: What|Removed |Added Resolution|EOL |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1351092] Review Request: python-geoip2 - MaxMind GeoIP2 API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351092 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-07-19 18:22:49 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1351092] Review Request: python-geoip2 - MaxMind GeoIP2 API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351092 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System--- python-geoip2-2.4.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1344115] Review Request: winetricks - Work around common problems in Wine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344115 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-07-19 18:21:49 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1344115] Review Request: winetricks - Work around common problems in Wine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344115 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System--- winetricks-20160709-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1050744] Review Request: belle-sip - Linphone SIP stack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744 --- Comment #45 from nucleo--- (In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #44) > readdir_r is deprecated, just use readdir everywhere. After I replaced readdir_r with readdir: belle_sip_utils.c: In function 'belle_sip_parse_directory': belle_sip_utils.c:1241:8: error: too many arguments to function 'readdir' res = readdir(dir, ent, ); ^~~ In file included from belle_sip_utils.c:31:0: /usr/include/dirent.h:162:23: note: declared here extern struct dirent *readdir (DIR *__dirp) __nonnull ((1)); ^~~ belle_sip_utils.c:1241:6: error: assignment makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion] res = readdir(dir, ent, ); ^ belle_sip_utils.c:1249:9: error: too many arguments to function 'readdir' res = readdir(dir, ent, ); ^~~ In file included from belle_sip_utils.c:31:0: /usr/include/dirent.h:162:23: note: declared here extern struct dirent *readdir (DIR *__dirp) __nonnull ((1)); ^~~ belle_sip_utils.c:1249:7: error: assignment makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion] res = readdir(dir, ent, ); -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1358041] New: Review Request: python3-scipy - Scientific Tools for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358041 Bug ID: 1358041 Summary: Review Request: python3-scipy - Scientific Tools for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: or...@cora.nwra.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-scipy.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-scipy-0.17.1-1.el7.src.rpm Description: Scipy is open-source software for mathematics, science, and engineering. The core library is NumPy which provides convenient and fast N-dimensional array manipulation. The SciPy library is built to work with NumPy arrays, and provides many user-friendly and efficient numerical routines such as routines for numerical integration and optimization. Together, they run on all popular operating systems, are quick to install, and are free of charge. NumPy and SciPy are easy to use, but powerful enough to be depended upon by some of the world's leading scientists and engineers. Fedora Account System Username: orion This is for EPEL7 only. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14953600 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1050744] Review Request: belle-sip - Linphone SIP stack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744 --- Comment #44 from Orion Poplawski--- readdir_r is deprecated, just use readdir everywhere. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1154750] Review Request: mozilla-privacy-badger - Protects your privacy by blocking spying ads and invisible trackers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154750 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewskichanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) | --- Comment #10 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- No reason given for FE-Legal block, so lifting. Feel free to re-add with rationale. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235 [Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1324784] Review Request: pseudo - Advanced tool for simulating superuser privileges
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784 --- Comment #5 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski--- (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #4) > (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #1) > > Can you use the name pseudoroot for package and binary? I think pseudo is a > > too generic name and pseudoroot would be in conjunction with fakeroot what > > does similiar things. > > Makes sense. I'll ask upstream. On second thought, I don't think it's an issue. Besides, Ubuntu is already packaging it as "pseudo"[1] and upstream's rationale for the name is that it's pronounced similar to "sudo". [1] http://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/pseudo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1351041] Review Request: mlt - A multimedia framework designed for television broadcasting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351041 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart)changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kwiz...@gmail.com --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- Anyone has made a mlt-freeworld package ? Because until mlt is made fully fonctional, the rpmfusion's mlt package will replace the mlt one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1324784] Review Request: pseudo - Advanced tool for simulating superuser privileges
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784 --- Comment #4 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski--- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #1) > Can you use the name pseudoroot for package and binary? I think pseudo is a > too generic name and pseudoroot would be in conjunction with fakeroot what > does similiar things. Makes sense. I'll ask upstream. > There's an alternative and some binary/script fakeroot-pseudo, is it a plugin? This is actually a drop-in replacement for fakeroot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1351041] Review Request: mlt - A multimedia framework designed for television broadcasting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351041 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart)--- I meant "replace the fedora's one" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1324784] Review Request: pseudo - Advanced tool for simulating superuser privileges
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784 --- Comment #3 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski--- It looks like bug 134647 is taken already, but I'll happily review something else for you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 804125] Review Request: rdkit - A toolkit for cheminformatics and machine learning
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125 --- Comment #43 from Antonio Trande--- Hi Gianluca. Is this package for epel too ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 804125] Review Request: rdkit - A toolkit for cheminformatics and machine learning
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125 Antonio Trandechanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|anto.tra...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1318814] Review Request: burp2 - Network backup / restore program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318814 Fedora End Of Lifechanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL Last Closed||2016-07-19 16:00:57 --- Comment #4 from Fedora End Of Life --- Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1337348] Review Request: mediawiki-piwik - MediaWiki Piwik integration extension
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337348 Ricky Elrodchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2016-07-19 15:36:53 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1223777] Review Request: rubygem-digest-tiger - A Digest module implementing the Tiger hashing algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223777 Fedora End Of Lifechanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL Last Closed||2016-07-19 15:34:52 --- Comment #1 from Fedora End Of Life --- Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1223780] Review Request: rubygem-twofish - Twofish symmetric cipher in pure Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223780 Fedora End Of Lifechanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL Last Closed||2016-07-19 15:35:00 --- Comment #3 from Fedora End Of Life --- Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1223774] Review Request: rubygem-aes - An AES encrypt/ decrypt gem built ontop of OpenSSL.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223774 Fedora End Of Lifechanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL Last Closed||2016-07-19 15:34:43 --- Comment #3 from Fedora End Of Life --- Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825 --- Comment #5 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski--- Sure, I'll review cmap-resources. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1350260] Review Request: cmap-resources - CMap Resources for Adobe' s public character collections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350260 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewskichanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|domi...@greysector.net Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Taking review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1354210] Review Request: xviewer - Fast and functional graphics viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354210 --- Comment #8 from Mario Blättermann--- There is a general problem with /usr/share/help and all of its language-based subdirectories. They are not owned by *any* package. Some ownerships on a real system happen by accidence, but there's no regular owner, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357974. The bug in the Amharic translation has been fixed already in Launchpad: https://translations.launchpad.net/linuxmint/latest/+pots/xviewer/am/+translate?batch=10=all=%E1%88%9D%E1%88%B5%E1%88%8E%E1%89%BD%3A%E1%89%B0%E1%8A%95%E1%88%B8%E1%88%AB%E1%89%B3%E1%89%BD+%E1%88%9B%E1%88%B3%E1%8B%AB%3A%E1%8A%95%E1%8B%B5%E1%8D%8E%E1%89%BD%3B I've renamed the ChangeLog files amd added them to doc. The user documentation has now its own subpackage. This behaves the same as in Glabels (which I've used as template): The -doc package is independent, because in fact it contains text files only. It will be pulled in automatically by the main package, to avoid unexpected behavior when calling the help in the GUI. The advantages are, the -doc package is noarch, and it is easier to declare the license (CC-BY-SA). Spec URL: https://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/xviewer.spec SRPM URL: https://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/xviewer-1.0.4-2.fc24.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1354202] Review Request: purple-hangouts - Adds support for Hangouts to libpurple-based clients
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354202 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/purple-hangouts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1324204] Review Request: fast-vm - script for defining VMs from images provided in thin LVM pool.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324204 Fedora End Of Lifechanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL Last Closed||2016-07-19 14:47:42 --- Comment #12 from Fedora End Of Life --- Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1328868] Review Request: presto - Distributed SQL query engine for big data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328868 Bug 1328868 depends on bug 1277450, which changed state. Bug 1277450 Summary: libsvm(-java) remove versioned jars from %{_javadir} https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277450 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1357978] Review Request: php-consolidation-annotated-command - Initialize Symfony Console commands from annotated command class methods
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357978 --- Comment #1 from Shawn Iwinski--- NOTE: Not latest version 1.1.x because 1.0.x is required by drush 8.1.3 dependency (bug 1357097) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1357978] Review Request: php-consolidation-annotated-command - Initialize Symfony Console commands from annotated command class methods
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357978 Shawn Iwinskichanged: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1357977 ||(php-consolidation-output-f ||ormatters) Alias||php-consolidation-annotated ||-command Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357977 [Bug 1357977] Review Request: php-consolidation-output-formatters - Format text by applying transformations provided by plug-in formatters -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1357978] Review Request: php-consolidation-annotated-command - Initialize Symfony Console commands from annotated command class methods
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357978 Shawn Iwinskichanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1357097 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357097 [Bug 1357097] drush-8.1.3 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1357977] New: Review Request: php-consolidation-output-formatters - Format text by applying transformations provided by plug-in formatters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357977 Bug ID: 1357977 Summary: Review Request: php-consolidation-output-formatters - Format text by applying transformations provided by plug-in formatters Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sh...@iwin.ski QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/siwinski/rpms/4858e809df9cad5c7992b0e40120b83f540eda16/php-consolidation-output-formatters/php-consolidation-output-formatters.spec SRPM URL: https://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/php-consolidation-output-formatters-1.0.0-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: Format text by applying transformations provided by plug-in formatters. Fedora Account System Username: siwinski -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1270405] Review Request: native_client - Google Native Client Toolchain
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270405 Orion Poplawskichanged: What|Removed |Added CC||or...@cora.nwra.com --- Comment #9 from Orion Poplawski --- It's also a terribly lousy name by virtue of being too generic. Can't wait for "native_server". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1357977] Review Request: php-consolidation-output-formatters - Format text by applying transformations provided by plug-in formatters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357977 Shawn Iwinskichanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1357097 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357097 [Bug 1357097] drush-8.1.3 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1357977] Review Request: php-consolidation-output-formatters - Format text by applying transformations provided by plug-in formatters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357977 Shawn Iwinskichanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1357978 ||(php-consolidation-annotate ||d-command) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357978 [Bug 1357978] Review Request: php-consolidation-annotated-command - Initialize Symfony Console commands from annotated command class methods -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1357977] Review Request: php-consolidation-output-formatters - Format text by applying transformations provided by plug-in formatters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357977 Shawn Iwinskichanged: What|Removed |Added Alias||php-consolidation-output-fo ||rmatters -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1357978] New: Review Request: php-consolidation-annotated-command - Initialize Symfony Console commands from annotated command class methods
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357978 Bug ID: 1357978 Summary: Review Request: php-consolidation-annotated-command - Initialize Symfony Console commands from annotated command class methods Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sh...@iwin.ski QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/siwinski/rpms/4d8d91a0a108bddf0c4cdf94b65eea16c2ec47c3/php-consolidation-annotated-command/php-consolidation-annotated-command.spec SRPM URL: https://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/php-consolidation-annotated-command-1.0.1-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: Initialize Symfony Console commands from annotated command class methods. Fedora Account System Username: siwinski -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1050744] Review Request: belle-sip - Linphone SIP stack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744 --- Comment #43 from nucleo--- (In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #41) > With the patch in Comment 40 applied, this package builds cleanly on Fedora > 24 (the patch fixes an obvious typo in a comparison that wasn't caught by > earlier gcc revisions). > > All the items noted in Chris's previous review are resolved in 1.4.2-1, so > I'm approving this package (please be sure to apply that patch before > committing). Thanks for the patch but it builds fine only in F24 and fails in Rawhide: belle_sip_utils.c: In function 'belle_sip_parse_directory': belle_sip_utils.c:1241:2: error: 'readdir_r' is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations] res = readdir_r(dir, ent, ); ^~~ In file included from belle_sip_utils.c:31:0: /usr/include/dirent.h:183:12: note: declared here extern int readdir_r (DIR *__restrict __dirp, ^ belle_sip_utils.c:1249:3: error: 'readdir_r' is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations] res = readdir_r(dir, ent, ); ^~~ In file included from belle_sip_utils.c:31:0: /usr/include/dirent.h:183:12: note: declared here extern int readdir_r (DIR *__restrict __dirp, ^ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1208911] Review Request: doublecmd - Twin-panel (commander-style) file manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911 Bug 1208911 depends on bug 1247925, which changed state. Bug 1247925 Summary: add ppc64le and aarch64 support for fpc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247925 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1269056] Review Request: php-pecl-mongodb - MongoDB driver for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269056 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System--- php-pecl-mongodb-1.1.8-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e331dcb6c7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1269056] Review Request: php-pecl-mongodb - MongoDB driver for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269056 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System--- php-pecl-mongodb-1.1.8-3.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-539597afca -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1269056] Review Request: php-pecl-mongodb - MongoDB driver for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269056 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1269056] Review Request: php-pecl-mongodb - MongoDB driver for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269056 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System--- php-pecl-mongodb-1.1.8-3.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b855865eef -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1244658] Review Request: dgit - Integration between git and Debian-style archives
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244658 Fedora End Of Lifechanged: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL Last Closed||2016-07-19 13:05:23 --- Comment #7 from Fedora End Of Life --- Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1343661] Rebase clufter component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661 Jan Pokornýchanged: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1357945 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357945 [Bug 1357945] [clufter integration] clufter is distribution-sensitive wrt. new features so pass the current one on cluster.conf/corosync.conf match and allow user's override -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1270322] Review Request: chromium - A WebKit (Blink) powered web browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322 --- Comment #57 from Jon Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/chromium -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352553] Review Request: php-zendframework-zend-expressive-twigrenderer - Twig integration for Expressive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352553 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-zendframework-zend-expressive-twigrenderer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352536] Review Request: php-zendframework-zend-expressive - PSR-7 Middleware Microframework based on Stratigility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352536 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-zendframework-zend-expressive -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352549] Review Request: php-zendframework-zend-expressive-platesrenderer - Plates integration for Expressive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352549 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-zendframework-zend-expressive-platesrenderer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352539] Review Request: php-zendframework-zend-expressive-zendviewrenderer - zend-view PhpRenderer integration for Expressive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352539 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-zendframework-zend-expressive-zendviewrenderer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352538] Review Request: php-zendframework-zend-expressive-helpers - Helper/ Utility classes for Expressive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352538 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-zendframework-zend-expressive-helpers -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1269056] Review Request: php-pecl-mongodb - MongoDB driver for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269056 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-pecl-mongodb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352516] Review Request: php-zendframework-zend-expressive-aurarouter - Aura.Router integration for Expressive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352516 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-zendframework-zend-expressive-aurarouter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352528] Review Request: php-zendframework-zend-expressive-zendrouter - zend-mvc router support for Expressive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352528 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-zendframework-zend-expressive-zendrouter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352520] Review Request: php-zendframework-zend-expressive-fastroute - FastRoute integration for Expressive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352520 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-zendframework-zend-expressive-fastroute -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352468] Review Request: php-aura-router - A web router implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352468 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-aura-router -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352475] Review Request: php-zendframework-zend-stratigility - Middleware for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352475 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-zendframework-zend-stratigility -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352471] Review Request: php-zendframework-zend-expressive-template - Template subcomponent for Expressive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352471 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-zendframework-zend-expressive-template -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352469] Review Request: php-zendframework-zend-expressive-router - Router subcomponent for Expressive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352469 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-zendframework-zend-expressive-router -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352466] Review Request: php-aura-di - Dependency injection container system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352466 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-aura-di -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1356048] Review Request: rtlsdr-scanner - Frequency scanning GUI for RTL2832 based DVB-T dongles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048 --- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rtlsdr-scanner -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1050744] Review Request: belle-sip - Linphone SIP stack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744 --- Comment #42 from Jon Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/belle-sip -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1355830] Review Request: hidrd - HID report descriptor I/ O library and conversion tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355830 Jaroslav Škarvadachanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(jskarvad@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- Thanks for the review, hopefully all fixed, new files: Spec URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/hidrd/hidrd.spec SRPM URL: hidrd-0.2.0-2.20160712git1abf7033.fc23.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1323186] Review Request: opa-fmgui - Intel OPA Fabric GUI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186 --- Comment #80 from Michal Schmidt--- (In reply to Neil Horman from comment #79) > Thank you Rick. You're approved as a sponsor now Correction: s/sponsor/packager/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1323186] Review Request: opa-fmgui - Intel OPA Fabric GUI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186 Rick Tierneychanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(rick.tierney@inte |needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co |l.com) |m) --- Comment #81 from Rick Tierney --- Got it, no problem! I'll be working on that next. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1346249] Review Request: resultsdb - Results store for automated tasks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346249 Jaroslav Škarvadachanged: What|Removed |Added CC||jskar...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- (In reply to Jiri Kulda from comment #1) > - If settings.py.example is a configuration file than it should be installed > in /etc/* without .example suffix And executable files shouldn't be in /etc, nor in /usr/share/*. Also .pyc, .pyo. shouldn't be in /usr/share/* (you will have to workaround python autocompile directories). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1341099] Review Request: taskotron-trigger - Triggering Taskotron jobs on fedmsgs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341099 Jaroslav Škarvadachanged: What|Removed |Added CC||jskar...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- (In reply to Jiri Kulda from comment #2) > - I think python will download extra dependencies listed in setup.py: > moksha.hub - probably > fedmsg - probably not because it is in Requires > requests - Same case as fedmsg > If not they need to be added into requires... I think these are runtime deps, IMHO they should be added to the requires. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1346249] Review Request: resultsdb - Results store for automated tasks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346249 --- Comment #1 from Jiri Kulda--- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 18 files have unknown license. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 4 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep = SHOULD items = Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [!]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [!]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
[Bug 1341099] Review Request: taskotron-trigger - Triggering Taskotron jobs on fedmsgs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341099 --- Comment #2 from Jiri Kulda--- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 20 files have unknown license. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /etc/logrotate.d [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [!]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [!]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [!]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep = SHOULD items = Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [?]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [!]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean
[Bug 1215071] Review Request: querydsl - Type-safe queries for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215071 Bug 1215071 depends on bug 1213455, which changed state. Bug 1213455 Summary: Enable java jdbc driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213455 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 739323] Review Request: mozilla-https-everywhere - HTTPS/ HSTS enforcement extension for Mozilla browsers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739323 Bug 739323 depends on bug 1154321, which changed state. Bug 1154321 Summary: Fedora Packaging Rules violation: No source for defaults/rulesets.sqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154321 What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Resolution|EOL |--- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1323186] Review Request: opa-fmgui - Intel OPA Fabric GUI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186 Neil Hormanchanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co |needinfo?(rick.tierney@inte |m) |l.com) --- Comment #79 from Neil Horman --- Thank you Rick. You're approved as a sponsor now, so you should be able to complete the import section of the packaging process and close this bz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1208001] Review Request: python3-bokeh - < please provide short description>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208001 Fedora End Of Lifechanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL Last Closed||2016-07-19 09:19:50 --- Comment #4 from Fedora End Of Life --- Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1357875] Review Request: php-dnoegel-php-xdg-base-dir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specification for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357875 Shawn Iwinskichanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1357876 (psysh) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357876 [Bug 1357876] Review Request: psysh - A runtime developer console, interactive debugger and REPL for PHP -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1357873] Review Request: php-jakub-onderka-php-console-highlighter - Highlight PHP code in console (terminal)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357873 Shawn Iwinskichanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1357876 (psysh) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357876 [Bug 1357876] Review Request: psysh - A runtime developer console, interactive debugger and REPL for PHP -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1357876] Review Request: psysh - A runtime developer console, interactive debugger and REPL for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357876 Shawn Iwinskichanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1357097 Depends On||1357873 ||(jakub-onderka-php-console- ||highlighter), 1357875 ||(php-dnoegel-php-xdg-base-d ||ir) Alias||psysh Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357097 [Bug 1357097] drush-8.1.3 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357873 [Bug 1357873] Review Request: php-jakub-onderka-php-console-highlighter - Highlight PHP code in console (terminal) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357875 [Bug 1357875] Review Request: php-dnoegel-php-xdg-base-dir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specification for PHP -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1357876] New: Review Request: psysh - A runtime developer console, interactive debugger and REPL for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357876 Bug ID: 1357876 Summary: Review Request: psysh - A runtime developer console, interactive debugger and REPL for PHP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sh...@iwin.ski QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/siwinski/rpms/0a2a1552bffbda9d50cb1ae24cf86de10a8c388f/psysh/psysh.spec SRPM URL: https://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/psysh-0.7.2-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: A runtime developer console, interactive debugger and REPL for PHP. Fedora Account System Username: siwinski -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1357873] Review Request: php-jakub-onderka-php-console-highlighter - Highlight PHP code in console (terminal)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357873 Shawn Iwinskichanged: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1357871 ||(php-jakub-onderka-php-cons ||ole-color) Alias||jakub-onderka-php-console-h ||ighlighter Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357871 [Bug 1357871] Review Request: php-jakub-onderka-php-console-color - Simple library for creating colored console output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1357875] Review Request: php-dnoegel-php-xdg-base-dir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specification for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357875 Shawn Iwinskichanged: What|Removed |Added Alias||php-dnoegel-php-xdg-base-di ||r -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1357875] New: Review Request: php-dnoegel-php-xdg-base-dir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specification for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357875 Bug ID: 1357875 Summary: Review Request: php-dnoegel-php-xdg-base-dir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specification for PHP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sh...@iwin.ski QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/siwinski/rpms/3cdf23e59945a7f9b2c9fa0d9dc3e5a971e7d0ce/php-dnoegel-php-xdg-base-dir/php-dnoegel-php-xdg-base-dir.spec SRPM URL: https://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/php-dnoegel-php-xdg-base-dir-0.1-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specification for PHP. Fedora Account System Username: siwinski -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1357871] Review Request: php-jakub-onderka-php-console-color - Simple library for creating colored console output
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357871 Shawn Iwinskichanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1357873 ||(jakub-onderka-php-console- ||highlighter) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357873 [Bug 1357873] Review Request: php-jakub-onderka-php-console-highlighter - Highlight PHP code in console (terminal) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1357873] New: Review Request: php-jakub-onderka-php-console-highlighter - Highlight PHP code in console (terminal)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357873 Bug ID: 1357873 Summary: Review Request: php-jakub-onderka-php-console-highlighter - Highlight PHP code in console (terminal) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sh...@iwin.ski QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/siwinski/rpms/057d2be065ed67e4d04ae86f303b3312c5d11ce1/php-jakub-onderka-php-console-highlighter/php-jakub-onderka-php-console-highlighter.spec SRPM URL: https://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/php-jakub-onderka-php-console-highlighter-0.3.2-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: Highlight PHP code in console (terminal). Fedora Account System Username: siwinski -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1357871] Review Request: php-jakub-onderka-php-console-color - Simple library for creating colored console output
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357871 Shawn Iwinskichanged: What|Removed |Added Alias||php-jakub-onderka-php-conso ||le-color -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1357871] New: Review Request: php-jakub-onderka-php-console-color - Simple library for creating colored console output
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357871 Bug ID: 1357871 Summary: Review Request: php-jakub-onderka-php-console-color - Simple library for creating colored console output Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sh...@iwin.ski QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/siwinski/rpms/96a1a2520097c1f99952102079d0171e692131ca/php-jakub-onderka-php-console-color/php-jakub-onderka-php-console-color.spec SRPM URL: https://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/php-jakub-onderka-php-console-color-0.1-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: Simple library for creating colored console output. Fedora Account System Username: siwinski -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org