[Bug 1366635] Review Request: python3-simpletal - An XML based template processor for TAL, TALES and METAL specifications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366635



--- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko  ---
(In reply to Dominika Krejčí from comment #1)
> You could use macro %{python3_version} in stead of * in files. ;)
> 
> %{python3_sitelib}/%{srcname}-%{version}-py%{python3_version}.egg-info

Not really.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366881] Review Request: ispc - C-based SPMD programming language compiler

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366881

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #19 from Igor Gnatenko  ---
Now it looks good ;)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1357724] Review Request: qcint - general GTO integrals for quantum chemistry

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357724



--- Comment #10 from Susi Lehtola  ---
Ping Matt, any progress?

PS. How're you coming along with pyscf? I'd like to see it in the distro.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1367971] Review Request: plasma-applet-weather-widget

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367971



--- Comment #6 from Gerald Cox  ---
Great... thanks much Jerry.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1307271] Review Request: vswm - Very Simple Wireless Manager

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307271



--- Comment #4 from Diogo Melo  ---
Hi Raphael and Giovanni,

I'm truly sorry about the delay. For some reason, my emails were going to
promotion tab.

Regarding the broken URLs. Here are the new URLs:

Spec URL: http://amuzi.me/vswm.spec
SRPM URL: http://amuzi.me/vswm-0.2-0.fc22.src.rpm

I'm working on the suggested changes. I will submit it ASAP.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1264660] Review Request: rubygem-mini_magick - Manipulate images

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264660



--- Comment #4 from Ilya Gradina  ---
New Spec:
https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/master/rubygems/rubygem-mini_magick.spec
New SRPM:
https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/master/rubygems/rubygem-mini_magick-4.5.1-1.fc24.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1367971] Review Request: plasma-applet-weather-widget

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367971

Jerry James  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Jerry James  ---
(In reply to Gerald Cox from comment #4)
> Didn't hear anything back yet on the directory ownership, but as mentioned
> in the ticket:  https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/ticket/269 - it's just
> notifying you that it could not determine the owner - and mentioning that my
> package must own any files it creates... and I do.  I didn't create those
> directories.  I could certainly take ownership and get rid of those messages
> by adding:
> 
> %dir %{_kf5_qmldir}/org/
> %dir %{_kf5_qmldir}/org/kde/
> %dir %{_kf5_qmldir}/org/kde/private/
> 
> but I don't think that would be appropriate since I did not create those
> directories.  It will need to be handled by whomever created them.

Agreed.  I see no further blocking issues, so this package is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1367971] Review Request: plasma-applet-weather-widget

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367971



--- Comment #4 from Gerald Cox  ---
OK, I've revised the spec and src.rpm:
Location of source files:
Spec URL:
https://gbcox.fedorapeople.org/review/plasma-applet-weather-widget.spec
SRPM URL:
https://gbcox.fedorapeople.org/review/plasma-applet-weather-widget-1.6.7-2.fc24.src.rpm

Didn't hear anything back yet on the directory ownership, but as mentioned in
the ticket:  https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/ticket/269 - it's just
notifying you that it could not determine the owner - and mentioning that my
package must own any files it creates... and I do.  I didn't create those
directories.  I could certainly take ownership and get rid of those messages by
adding:

%dir %{_kf5_qmldir}/org/
%dir %{_kf5_qmldir}/org/kde/
%dir %{_kf5_qmldir}/org/kde/private/

but I don't think that would be appropriate since I did not create those
directories.  It will need to be handled by whomever created them.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1352215] Review Request: llvm3.7 -- Versioned LLVM 3.7

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352215

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
llvm3.7-3.7.1-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a012749321

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366841] Review Request: openhft-java-lang - High Performance Java Lang library for High Frequency Trading

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366841

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
openhft-java-lang-6.8.2-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a5693080d4

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1361659] Re-Review Request: vdsm - Virtual Desktop Server Manager

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361659

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  ---
vdsm-4.18.999-440.git0bb7717.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-4df131ccd3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
mozilla-lightbeam-1.3.1-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-974e78f169

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366028] Review Request: python-flask-migrate - SQLAlchemy database migrations for Flask applications using Alembic

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366028

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-flask-migrate-2.0.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0c16f5b731

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368849] Review Request: rubygem-pathutil - Faster pure Ruby implementation of Pathname with extra bits

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368849

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc25, rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.fc25,
rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.fc25, rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-2.fc25,
rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc25, rubygem-pathutil-0.14.0-1.fc25,
rubygem-rouge-1.11.1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-37c56ba33e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368846] Review Request: rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter - Basic Sass converter for Jekyll

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368846

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc25, rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.fc25,
rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.fc25, rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-2.fc25,
rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc25, rubygem-pathutil-0.14.0-1.fc25,
rubygem-rouge-1.11.1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-37c56ba33e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368847] Review Request: rubygem-jekyll-watch - Rebuild your Jekyll site when a file changes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368847

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc25, rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.fc25,
rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.fc25, rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-2.fc25,
rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc25, rubygem-pathutil-0.14.0-1.fc25,
rubygem-rouge-1.11.1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-37c56ba33e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1364536] Review Request: terracotta-statistics - Terracotta Statistics

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364536

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
terracotta-statistics-1.1.0-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2d8ea3cee3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368845] Review Request: rubygem-forwardable-extended - Forwardable with hash, and instance variable extensions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368845

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc25, rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.fc25,
rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.fc25, rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-2.fc25,
rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc25, rubygem-pathutil-0.14.0-1.fc25,
rubygem-rouge-1.11.1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-37c56ba33e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366836] Review Request: webjars-locator-core - WebJar Locator Core functionality

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366836

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
webjars-locator-core-0.31-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-da4be3266a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368850] Review Request: rubygem-rouge - Simple, easy-to-extend drop-in replacement for pygments

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368850

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc25, rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.fc25,
rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.fc25, rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-2.fc25,
rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc25, rubygem-pathutil-0.14.0-1.fc25,
rubygem-rouge-1.11.1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-37c56ba33e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368848] Review Request: rubygem-mercenary - An easier way to build your command-line scripts in Ruby

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368848

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc25, rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.fc25,
rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.fc25, rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-2.fc25,
rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc25, rubygem-pathutil-0.14.0-1.fc25,
rubygem-rouge-1.11.1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-37c56ba33e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368844] Review Request: rubygem-colorator - Colorize your text in the terminal

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368844

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc25, rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.fc25,
rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.fc25, rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-2.fc25,
rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc25, rubygem-pathutil-0.14.0-1.fc25,
rubygem-rouge-1.11.1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-37c56ba33e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366355] Review Request: acme-tiny - Tiny auditable ACME script for Let's Encrypt

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366355



--- Comment #18 from Stuart D Gathman  ---
Testing with sendmail reveals a minor problem:

Aug 23 16:19:41 mail sendmail[6198]: STARTTLS=server: file
/var/lib/acme/certs/mail.crt unsafe: Permission denied

sendmail doesn't like the cert being writable by other.  This seems overly
paranoid - the key is a separate config and is secure.  I'm not thinking of a
simple way for acme-tiny to facilitate sendmail - the simplest seems to be a
root cron script that copies the mail crt when it changes.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1348202] Review Request: rubygem-pcaprub - libpcap bindings for ruby

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348202

Fabio Alessandro Locati  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Fabio Alessandro Locati  ---
Please delete commented code.

Package is ok, APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1348163] Review Request: rubygem-network-interface - A cross platform gem to help get network interface information

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348163



--- Comment #3 from Fabio Alessandro Locati  ---
This package is wrongly name. the file is rubygem-network_interface while the
package itself is rubygem-network-interface. This is wrong. The name has to be
exactly the same.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1348160] Review Request: rubygem-em-proxy - EventMachine Proxy DSL

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348160



--- Comment #14 from Fabio Alessandro Locati  ---
ok, then use it, because ATM you are adding it to the package but you are not
using it

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1348162] Review Request: rubygem-net-dns - Pure Ruby DNS library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348162

Fabio Alessandro Locati  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #7 from Fabio Alessandro Locati  ---
Ok, nice work. APPROVED!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368851] Review Request: rubygem-jekyll - Transform your plain text into static websites and blogs

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368851



--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rubygem-jekyll

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1369558] Review Request: python-smartcols - Python bindings for util-linux libsmartcols-library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369558

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Alias||python-smartcols



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1369558] Review Request: python-smartcols - Python bindings for util-linux libsmartcols-library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369558



--- Comment #1 from Igor Gnatenko  ---
Spec URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-smartcols.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-smartcols-0.1.1-2.fc26.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368851] Review Request: rubygem-jekyll - Transform your plain text into static websites and blogs

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368851

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo  ---
Issues:
- Package contains Requires: ruby(release).

[!]: Gem package should exclude cached Gem.
[!]: Test suite of the library should be run.
[!]: Specfile should use macros from rubygem-devel package.
 Note: The specfile doesn't use these macros: %exclude %{gem_cache},
 %{gem_libdir}

NON blocking issues:

[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 78 files have
 unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1368851
 -rubygem-jekyll/licensecheck.txt

 All source files without license headers:
 Please, report to upstream

[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.

 Please, add also License file in doc sub package

PLease, fix before import
Approved

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368851] Review Request: rubygem-jekyll - Transform your plain text into static websites and blogs

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368851



--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Package contains Requires: ruby(release).
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
  in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
  for the package is included in %license.
  Note: License file LICENSE.txt.erb is not marked as %license
  See:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 78 files have
 unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1368851
 -rubygem-jekyll/licensecheck.txt

 All source files without license headers:
 Please, report to upstream

[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.

 Please, add also License file in doc sub package

[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gems/cache,
 /usr/share/gems, /usr/share/gems/doc
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Ruby:
[x]: Platform dependent files must all go under %{gem_extdir_mri}, platform
 independent under %{gem_dir}.
[x]: Gem package must not define a non-gem subpackage
[x]: Macro %{gem_extdir} is deprecated.
[x]: Gem package is named rubygem-%{gem_name}
[x]: Package contains BuildRequires: rubygems-devel.
[x]: Gem package must define %{gem_name} macro.
[x]: Pure Ruby package must be built as noarch
[x]: Package does not contain Requires: ruby(abi).

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
 Note: Package contains font files
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rubygem-
 jekyll-doc
[x]: Package 

[Bug 1368851] Review Request: rubygem-jekyll - Transform your plain text into static websites and blogs

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368851



--- Comment #1 from Björn "besser82" Esser  ---
Koji Build:

  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15353716

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1367569] Review Request: perl-PFT - Hacker friendly static blog generator, core library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367569



--- Comment #6 from Giovanni  ---
Adding up Koji build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15353711

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368790] Review Request: perl-App-PFT - Hacker friendly static blog generator, command line utilities

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368790



--- Comment #9 from Giovanni  ---
Adding up Koji build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15353691

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368851] Review Request: rubygem-jekyll - Transform your plain text into static websites and blogs

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368851

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368790] Review Request: perl-App-PFT - Hacker friendly static blog generator, command line utilities

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368790



--- Comment #8 from Giovanni  ---
Indeed I was able to reproduce the error and to fix it with %{_fixperms} as by
point 6. All the remaining part was 

Everything should be fixed right now.

SPEC:
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/dacav/pft/perl-App-PFT.git/plain/perl-App-PFT.spec

SRPM:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/dacav/pft/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00443971-perl-App-PFT/perl-App-PFT-1.0.5-3.fc26.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1367569] Review Request: perl-PFT - Hacker friendly static blog generator, core library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367569



--- Comment #5 from Giovanni  ---
Some updates obtained by applying compatible comments from Bug 1368790.
New version of the spec and of its src.rpm.

- SPEC:
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/dacav/pft/perl-PFT.git/plain/perl-PFT.spec

- SRPM:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/dacav/pft/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00443648-perl-PFT/perl-PFT-1.0.3-3.fc26.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368849] Review Request: rubygem-pathutil - Faster pure Ruby implementation of Pathname with extra bits

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368849



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.el6 rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.el6
rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.el6 rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-1.el6
rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.el6 rubygem-pathutil-0.14.0-1.el6 has been submitted
as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-caa664f1d5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368849] Review Request: rubygem-pathutil - Faster pure Ruby implementation of Pathname with extra bits

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368849



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc24 rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.fc24
rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.fc24 rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-1.fc24
rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc24 rubygem-pathutil-0.14.0-1.fc24
rubygem-rouge-1.11.1-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-251f7325a0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368849] Review Request: rubygem-pathutil - Faster pure Ruby implementation of Pathname with extra bits

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368849



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.el7 rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.el7
rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.el7 rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-1.el7
rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.el7 rubygem-pathutil-0.14.0-1.el7
rubygem-rouge-1.11.1-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-3d40c22c4e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368849] Review Request: rubygem-pathutil - Faster pure Ruby implementation of Pathname with extra bits

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368849



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc25 rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.fc25
rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.fc25 rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-2.fc25
rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc25 rubygem-pathutil-0.14.0-1.fc25
rubygem-rouge-1.11.1-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-37c56ba33e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368849] Review Request: rubygem-pathutil - Faster pure Ruby implementation of Pathname with extra bits

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368849

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368850] Review Request: rubygem-rouge - Simple, easy-to-extend drop-in replacement for pygments

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368850



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc24 rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.fc24
rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.fc24 rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-1.fc24
rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc24 rubygem-rouge-1.11.1-1.fc24 has been submitted
as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-251f7325a0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368850] Review Request: rubygem-rouge - Simple, easy-to-extend drop-in replacement for pygments

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368850

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368850] Review Request: rubygem-rouge - Simple, easy-to-extend drop-in replacement for pygments

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368850



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.el7 rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.el7
rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.el7 rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-1.el7
rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.el7 rubygem-rouge-1.11.1-1.el7 has been submitted as
an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-3d40c22c4e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368850] Review Request: rubygem-rouge - Simple, easy-to-extend drop-in replacement for pygments

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368850



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc25 rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.fc25
rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.fc25 rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-2.fc25
rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc25 rubygem-rouge-1.11.1-1.fc25 has been submitted
as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-37c56ba33e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1365782] python-django-model-utils - Django model mixins and utilities

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1365782



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-django-model-utils-2.5.2-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-8076c1cbde

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1364535] Review Request: ehcache2 - Java in-process cache

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364535



--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/ehcache2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1367971] Review Request: plasma-applet-weather-widget

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367971



--- Comment #3 from Gerald Cox  ---
Wow, that was fast... Thanks Jerry!

This is just a quick note to comment on some things before I lost track.

1.  Since the Fonts issue is a "should" I'll deal with that at another time.

2.  The "description too long" error is a known problem reported here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768393
I've re-opened, but apparently no one in the rpmlint team deems it worthy
enough to even comment.

3.  I've submitted a question on the kde mailing list regarding the directories
that were created by other packages that are not owned.  Regarding
/usr/share/plasma/plasmoids; that directory is actually owned by two packages:

rpm -qf /usr/share/plasma/plasmoids
plasma-workspace-5.7.3-2.fc24.x86_64
plasma-desktop-5.7.3-1.fc24.x86_64

and appears to be this issue:
https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/ticket/269

It has been tagged as *WONTFIX* "...this is not a false positive, fedora-review
just cannot determine the directory owner. That is what the message says, it's
not saying that there is no owner. Basically, it means that a manual check is
necessary."

Regarding the other directories, I can certainly claim ownership to eliminate
the error but I'm unsure if that is the correct thing to do.  I'll wait to hear
back from the mailing list for guidance on that.  When I receive, I'll update
this ticket.

I'm also going to remove the icon cache processing... that was an oversight on
my part, it isn't needed.  There are no desktop icons.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1361212] Review Request: perl-Ref-Util - Utility functions for checking references

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361212



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Ref-Util-0.020-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1245958] Review Request: golang-github-coreos-pkg - A collection of go utility packages

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245958



--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-coreos-pkg-0-0.8.gitfa29b1d.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora
EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1361212] Review Request: perl-Ref-Util - Utility functions for checking references

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361212



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Ref-Util-0.020-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1350974] Openstack python-watcherclient

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350974



--- Comment #15 from Daniel Pawlik  ---
Hi,
Thanks Javier Peña for reviewing.

I made changes and updated version in on github.



Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dduuch/openstack-watcherclient/master/python-watcherclient.spec

SRPM URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dduuch/openstack-watcherclient/master/python-watcherclient-0.24.0-1.fc24.src.rpm


Github page: https://github.com/dduuch/openstack-watcherclient


If something is wrong, pls leave comment on github page ;)


Thanks a lot!


Regards

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1369560] Review Request: snapd-xdg-open - Bridge allowing (untrusted) snap applications to use xdg-open

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369560

Neal Gompa  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com



--- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa  ---
Taking this review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1364535] Review Request: ehcache2 - Java in-process cache

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364535



--- Comment #14 from gil cattaneo  ---
Sorry wrong referencies, for SCM request

create new SCM requests:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7427
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7428

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1369560] New: Review Request: snapd-xdg-open - Bridge allowing ( untrusted) snap applications to use xdg-open

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369560

Bug ID: 1369560
   Summary: Review Request: snapd-xdg-open - Bridge allowing
(untrusted) snap applications to use xdg-open
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@zygoon.pl
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~zyga/snapd-xdg-open.spec
SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~zyga/snapd-xdg-open-0.0.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: 
A D-Bus-activated helper service allowing snaps to launch URLs on the host
where its installed. The service validates and checks the requested URLs before
allowing them to be opened.

Fedora Account System Username: zyga

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366837] Review Request: webjars-locator - WebJar Locator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366837



--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/webjars-locator

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1367518] Review Request: async-http-client1 - Asynchronous Http Client for Java

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367518



--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/async-http-client1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366838] Review Request: gs-collections - A supplement or replacement for the Java Collections Framework

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366838



--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/gs-collections

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1369244] Review Request: jackson-datatype-jsr310 - Add-on module to support JSR-310 ( Java 8 Date & Time API) data types

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369244



--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/jackson-datatype-jsr310

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366835] Review Request: reactive-streams - A Protocol for Asynchronous Non-Blocking Data Sequence

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366835



--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/reactive-streams

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1369558] New: Review Request: python-smartcols - Python bindings for util-linux libsmartcols-library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369558

Bug ID: 1369558
   Summary: Review Request: python-smartcols - Python bindings for
util-linux libsmartcols-library
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: ignate...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-smartcols.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-smartcols-0.1.1-1.fc26.src.rpm
Description: Python bindings for util-linux libsmartcols-library.
Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1369248] Review Request: jackson-datatype-jdk8 - Add-on module for Jackson to support JDK 8 data types

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369248



--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/jackson-datatype-jdk8

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368849] Review Request: rubygem-pathutil - Faster pure Ruby implementation of Pathname with extra bits

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368849



--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rubygem-pathutil

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368850] Review Request: rubygem-rouge - Simple, easy-to-extend drop-in replacement for pygments

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368850



--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rubygem-rouge

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1364535] Review Request: ehcache2 - Java in-process cache

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364535



--- Comment #13 from gil cattaneo  ---
Thanks for the review!

create new SCM request/s:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7425
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7426

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366835] Review Request: reactive-streams - A Protocol for Asynchronous Non-Blocking Data Sequence

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366835



--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo  ---
Thanks for the review!

create new SCM request/s:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7419
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7420

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1367518] Review Request: async-http-client1 - Asynchronous Http Client for Java

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367518



--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo  ---
Thanks for the review!

create new SCM request/s:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7425
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7426

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366837] Review Request: webjars-locator - WebJar Locator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366837



--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo  ---
Thanks for the review!

create new SCM request/s:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7423
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7424

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1366838] Review Request: gs-collections - A supplement or replacement for the Java Collections Framework

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366838



--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo  ---
Thanks for the review!

create new SCM request/s:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7421
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7422

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1369244] Review Request: jackson-datatype-jsr310 - Add-on module to support JSR-310 ( Java 8 Date & Time API) data types

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369244



--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo  ---
Thanks for the review!

create new SCM request/s:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7418

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1369248] Review Request: jackson-datatype-jdk8 - Add-on module for Jackson to support JDK 8 data types

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369248



--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo  ---
Thanks for the review!

create new SCM request/s:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7417

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368845] Review Request: rubygem-forwardable-extended - Forwardable with hash, and instance variable extensions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368845



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc24 rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.fc24
rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.fc24 rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-1.fc24
rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-251f7325a0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368845] Review Request: rubygem-forwardable-extended - Forwardable with hash, and instance variable extensions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368845



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.el6 rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.el6
rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.el6 rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-1.el6
rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-caa664f1d5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368845] Review Request: rubygem-forwardable-extended - Forwardable with hash, and instance variable extensions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368845



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.el7 rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.el7
rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.el7 rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-1.el7
rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-3d40c22c4e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368845] Review Request: rubygem-forwardable-extended - Forwardable with hash, and instance variable extensions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368845

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368845] Review Request: rubygem-forwardable-extended - Forwardable with hash, and instance variable extensions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368845



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc25 rubygem-forwardable-extended-2.6.0-1.fc25
rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.fc25 rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-1.fc25
rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-37c56ba33e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368846] Review Request: rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter - Basic Sass converter for Jekyll

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368846



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc24 rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.fc24
rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-1.fc24 rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc24 has been
submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-251f7325a0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368846] Review Request: rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter - Basic Sass converter for Jekyll

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368846



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.el6 rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.el6
rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-1.el6 rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.el6 has been
submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-caa664f1d5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368846] Review Request: rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter - Basic Sass converter for Jekyll

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368846



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.el7 rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.el7
rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-1.el7 rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.el7 has been
submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-3d40c22c4e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368846] Review Request: rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter - Basic Sass converter for Jekyll

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368846

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368846] Review Request: rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter - Basic Sass converter for Jekyll

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368846



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc25 rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter-1.4.0-1.fc25
rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-1.fc25 rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc25 has been
submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-37c56ba33e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368847] Review Request: rubygem-jekyll-watch - Rebuild your Jekyll site when a file changes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368847



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc24 rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-1.fc24
rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-251f7325a0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368847] Review Request: rubygem-jekyll-watch - Rebuild your Jekyll site when a file changes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368847



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.el7 rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-1.el7
rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-3d40c22c4e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368847] Review Request: rubygem-jekyll-watch - Rebuild your Jekyll site when a file changes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368847

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368847] Review Request: rubygem-jekyll-watch - Rebuild your Jekyll site when a file changes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368847



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.el6 rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-1.el6
rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-caa664f1d5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368847] Review Request: rubygem-jekyll-watch - Rebuild your Jekyll site when a file changes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368847



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc25 rubygem-jekyll-watch-1.5.0-1.fc25
rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-37c56ba33e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368845] Review Request: rubygem-forwardable-extended - Forwardable with hash, and instance variable extensions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368845



--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rubygem-forwardable-extended

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1369248] Review Request: jackson-datatype-jdk8 - Add-on module for Jackson to support JDK 8 data types

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369248

Michael Simacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Michael Simacek  ---
Looks ok now, APPROVED


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183
[Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368851] Review Request: rubygem-jekyll - Transform your plain text into static websites and blogs

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368851

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||punto...@libero.it
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1369244] Review Request: jackson-datatype-jsr310 - Add-on module to support JSR-310 ( Java 8 Date & Time API) data types

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369244

Michael Simacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #7 from Michael Simacek  ---
Looks ok now, APPROVED


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183
[Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368850] Review Request: rubygem-rouge - Simple, easy-to-extend drop-in replacement for pygments

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368850

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo  ---
Issues:

- Package contains Requires: ruby(release).

[!]: Gem package should exclude cached Gem.
[!]: Test suite of the library should be run.
[!]: Specfile should use macros from rubygem-devel package.
 Note: The specfile doesn't use these macros: %exclude %{gem_cache},
 %{gem_libdir}


NON blocking issues:
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD (2 clause) MIT/X11 (BSD like)".
 237 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/gil/1368850-rubygem-rouge/licensecheck.txt
 All source files without license headers:
 Please, report to upstream

[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.

 Please, add also License file in doc sub package

Please, fix before import
Approved

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368850] Review Request: rubygem-rouge - Simple, easy-to-extend drop-in replacement for pygments

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368850

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Package contains Requires: ruby(release).


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD (2 clause) MIT/X11 (BSD like)".
 237 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/gil/1368850-rubygem-rouge/licensecheck.txt
 All source files without license headers:
 Please, report to upstream

[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.

 Please, add also License file in doc sub package

[-]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
 must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gems/cache,
 /usr/share/gems, /usr/share/gems/doc
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Ruby:
[x]: Platform dependent files must all go under %{gem_extdir_mri}, platform
 independent under %{gem_dir}.
[x]: Gem package must not define a non-gem subpackage
[x]: Macro %{gem_extdir} is deprecated.
[x]: Gem package is named rubygem-%{gem_name}
[x]: Package contains BuildRequires: rubygems-devel.
[x]: Gem package must define %{gem_name} macro.
[x]: Pure Ruby package must be built as noarch
[x]: Package does not contain Requires: ruby(abi).

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
 Note: Package contains font files
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final 

[Bug 1368848] Review Request: rubygem-mercenary - An easier way to build your command-line scripts in Ruby

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368848



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc24 rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc24 has been
submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-251f7325a0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368848] Review Request: rubygem-mercenary - An easier way to build your command-line scripts in Ruby

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368848



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.el6 rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.el6 has been submitted
as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-caa664f1d5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368848] Review Request: rubygem-mercenary - An easier way to build your command-line scripts in Ruby

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368848



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.el7 rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.el7 has been submitted
as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-3d40c22c4e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368848] Review Request: rubygem-mercenary - An easier way to build your command-line scripts in Ruby

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368848

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368848] Review Request: rubygem-mercenary - An easier way to build your command-line scripts in Ruby

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368848



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-colorator-1.1.0-1.fc25 rubygem-mercenary-0.3.6-1.fc25 has been
submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-37c56ba33e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1368850] Review Request: rubygem-rouge - Simple, easy-to-extend drop-in replacement for pygments

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368850

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||punto...@libero.it
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org