[Bug 1579528] Review Request: tflogger - TensorFlow event logger
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579528 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KFGZGRQHA6STM6F5NBOLC435ZHJLY6HE/
[Bug 1579528] Review Request: tflogger - TensorFlow event logger
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579528 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- tflogger-0.1.1-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-230fa660b8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IG5EG3W4BSIDNW3VUDDPTTP3FNXOOCRC/
[Bug 1579528] Review Request: tflogger - TensorFlow event logger
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579528 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- tflogger-0.1.1-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-32e4f13343 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Y72JPW3AJLC5GBQFUO3WFEOQIVTWVDIM/
[Bug 1578108] Review Request: python-towncrier - Building newsfiles for your project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578108 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- python-towncrier-17.8.0-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7db4f93052 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5TZKJOTTDI7JBGW3TJFECZR4DXS4DXDL/
[Bug 1578093] Review Request: python-constantly - Symbolic constants in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578093 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- python-constantly-15.1.0-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-767dd39f87 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5R26GH6IITW3CJZACWLM5WWJEUK7FPPL/
[Bug 1578107] Review Request: python-priority - A pure-Python implementation of the HTTP/ 2 priority tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578107 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- python-priority-1.3.0-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-666563d2eb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EWISY6SAN26XWV4OK6HU55CMDZAMXIJG/
[Bug 1573997] Review Request: golang-github-jedisct1-xsecretbox - Go implementation of crypto_secretbox_xchacha20poly1305
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573997 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-jedisct1-xsecretbox-0-0.1.20180518git7a679c0.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-b997ba3241 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2LU7LQDGPIJVVB3V5JCG6GPWRLQBXI4F/
[Bug 1573991] Review Request: golang-github-aead-chacha20 - ChaCha20 and XChaCha20 stream ciphers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573991 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-aead-chacha20-0-0.1.20180517gite253874.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e8bd8fcb9f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WRRK2SEO27BDPD2MVQIC7BX6GGJMEBQJ/
[Bug 1575412] Review Request: libmml - MML Widget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575412 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- COPASI-4.23.184-5.fc28, libmml-2.4-2.20180425git07159b0.fc28, qwtplot3d-qt5-0.3.1a-4.20170803git34d8141.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-61efbc5eb0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KOMNJUS4NOG46KLMKA3QRKTPDGT7BWV3/
[Bug 1573999] Review Request: golang-github-pquerna-cachecontrol - Golang HTTP Cache-Control Parser and Interpretation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573999 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-pquerna-cachecontrol-0-0.2.20180517git0923c70.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-af840e2ff2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QZXOMROBI7HFFS2YTU5UXAVT23Q4JKMY/
[Bug 1573999] Review Request: golang-github-pquerna-cachecontrol - Golang HTTP Cache-Control Parser and Interpretation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573999 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-facebookgo-pidfile-0-0.1.20180517gitf242e29.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f9f787ad4c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4XHYPW4S52KV2B4GFFVQQJDRF7W6WUKM/
[Bug 1573993] Review Request: golang-github-aead-poly1305 - The poly1305 message authentication code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573993 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-aead-poly1305-0-0.1.20180517git969857f.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f4f3c11dde -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZRCANDRDDFFI2DIH727J66J5N52YBKFH/
[Bug 1575991] Review Request: golang-github-jedisct1-dnsstamps - DNS Stamps library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575991 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-jedisct1-dnsstamps-0-0.1.20180517git1e49992.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0e4ad90e02 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MC3A66ZD6LNTEJSBMV5CZHKXGIB75CSW/
[Bug 1573984] Review Request: golang-github-facebookgo-atomicfile - Provides an atomically written/ replaced file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573984 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-facebookgo-atomicfile-0-0.1.20180517git2de1f20.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-4afe778ee1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3L5QLZI6HCOUYVLEO7DLIEKJYVZHGCOB/
[Bug 1575992] Review Request: golang-github-k-sone-critbitgo - Crit-bit trees in golang and its applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575992 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-k-sone-critbitgo-1.2.0-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-91e49711fd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Z4VKIO5EYFRAI3MBBOVE3NOCOCLAXPLE/
[Bug 1573995] Review Request: golang-github-jedisct1-dlog - A super simple logger for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573995 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-jedisct1-dlog-0.3-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-61a830bc27 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6GHS6FIHDBX4XGHYRBXZAORQDCS5PJS7/
[Bug 1566718] Review Request: quasselgrep - Tool for searching quassel logs from the commandline
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566718 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- quasselgrep-0.1-0.2.20170411git502c88b.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6MFISAOX5JRG2OSETTUNLC7WBDE5JFUY/
[Bug 1419379] Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- libefp-1.5.0-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2JW6T5FHY4C4GVQIOY7F5BEK3XOYTOBW/
[Bug 1575453] Review Request: R-quadprog - Functions to solve Quadratic Programming Problems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575453 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-05-18 22:00:52 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- R-quadprog-1.5.5-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HQH4QD5DV74ARLYUBKFXZHTXSWLS4D33/
[Bug 1575676] Review Request: python3-exiv2 - Python3 bindings for the exiv2 library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575676 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-05-18 22:00:45 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python3-exiv2-0.2.1-3.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CSW34A5FYJETYC4UGWR6S7DGCCZZ2XLT/
[Bug 1575452] Review Request: R-chron - Chronological Objects which can Handle Dates and Times
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575452 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- R-chron-2.3.52-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Q5HNE3DIUFPV426JDIS7MURPIB4IHLSW/
[Bug 1566889] Review Request: ghc-mockery - Support functions for automated testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566889 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-05-18 22:00:34 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-mockery-0.3.5-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MCWTR64PHE4ULGAQGG64Q5YR4ITM5NLZ/
[Bug 1566718] Review Request: quasselgrep - Tool for searching quassel logs from the commandline
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566718 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-05-18 22:00:27 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- quasselgrep-0.1-0.2.20170411git502c88b.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4UNUY5IYHU64MMVSPTZDFO554HYII4FZ/
[Bug 1572459] Review Request: R-future - Unified Parallel and Distributed Processing in R for Everyone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572459 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-05-18 22:00:32 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- R-future-1.8.1-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/E2ABM5S4Z6LX76Y6BAIAHSP23MBMI2MF/
[Bug 1575412] Review Request: libmml - MML Widget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575412 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- COPASI-4.23.184-5.fc27, libmml-2.4-2.20180425git07159b0.fc27, qwtplot3d-qt5-0.3.1a-4.20170803git34d8141.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9c5e508ffe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3A6PNOHTPFHVXCZBSXBDPGBXRQKTDYTB/
[Bug 1424890] Review Request: domterm - terminal emulator based on web technologies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424890 --- Comment #33 from Per Bothner --- "Source0 is wrong. It seems you didn't actually tag 1.0.2?" I've made a habit of updating the version number in domterm.spec when I update the version number in the git repository itself. It probably makes more sense to only update the version number in domterm.spec when creating a tag or release. The "BSD1" is because some package-test program didn't like plain "BSD" - don't remember which. I'll change it to the latter. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/K6AOMLYHLTERVYFPOECX5N2EA7HJCUEM/
[Bug 1570047] Review Request: prestopalette - A tool for artists to create harmonious color palettes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570047 --- Comment #10 from Darryl T. Agostinelli --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/PrestoPalette/PrestoPalette-Packaging/master/Fedora/prestopalette.spec SRPM URL: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8166/26828166/prestopalette-0.1.31-1.fc29.src.rpm FYI: see comment on 2018-05-06 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SI4Q25KSBZFCUGYMMZMJNJRJRFFMSJ5L/
[Bug 1424890] Review Request: domterm - terminal emulator based on web technologies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424890 --- Comment #32 from Per Bothner --- In terms of I reviewing other packages, I'm having trouble finding packages that haven't already gotten the kind of review I'd be qualified to give. There there are some packages in my areas of interest/expertise, but they already have a number of comments. One exception is js-viewport-navigation (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571742). There I focused on the package itself, rather than the packaging, and opined it was not suitable/ready for Fedora - hopefully in a constructive way. I tried fedora-review on pgcli (https://bugzilla.redhat.comshow_bug.cgi?id=1570551) but ran into problems, as you can see. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PR22YA72EJVFNQKEXY2AG4JEIVGDOWUT/
[Bug 1570551] Review Request: pgcli - Postgres CLI with autocompletion and syntax highlighting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570551 Per Bothner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@bothner.com --- Comment #1 from Per Bothner --- The SRPM URL is dead. Instead I tried: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/meeuw/pgcli/fedora-27-x86_64/00738202-pgcli/pgcli-1.9.1-1.fc27.src.rpm I got a confusing result from fedora-review: INFO: Processing local files: /home/bothner/Downloads/pgcli-1.9.1-1.fc27.src.rpm INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : Local files in /home/bothner/tmp INFO: --> SRPM url: file:///home/bothner/Downloads/pgcli-1.9.1-1.fc27.src.rpm INFO: Using review directory: /home/bothner/tmp/pgcli INFO: Downloading (Source0): https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/p/pgcli/pgcli-1.9.1.tar.gz INFO: Running checks and generating report ERROR: Exception(/home/bothner/Downloads/pgcli-1.9.1-1.fc27.src.rpm) Config(fedora-27-x86_64) 0 minutes 4 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /home/bothner/tmp/pgcli/results ERROR: Command failed: INFO: WARNING: Probably non-rawhide buildroot used. Rawhide should be used for most package reviews ERROR: 'mock build failed, see /home/bothner/tmp/pgcli/results/build.log' [tmp]1059$ less /home/bothner/tmp/pgcli/results/build.log [tmp]1060$ uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 4.16.8-300.fc28.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed May 9 20:23:40 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux No useful error messages in /home/bothner/tmp/pgcli/results/build.log. I'm running Fedora 28. If you still want this reviewed, I suggest creating a new src.rpm for Fedora 28, and fixing the URLs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4UDM64OIKX3SUTPEYWP5YLBUIMQQJSUO/
[Bug 1577690] Review Request: ignition-cmake - CMake modules to be used by the Ignition projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1577690 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ignition-cmake -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZO4QKEZ37RICLCE5CVUZSYKDQPKTAUL4/
[Bug 1571742] Review Request: js-viewport-navigation - Scrolling viewport contents navigation menu for web pages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571742 --- Comment #4 from Per Bothner --- Bottom line: I don't think js-viewport-navigation by itself is suitable as a Fedora package. However, I do have something related that I'd love someone to look at: Last year Mathieu Lirzin did a Google Summer of Code project (http://mathieu.lirzin.emi.u-bordeaux.fr/tags/texinfo/) to implement smart JavaScript navigation for GNU texinfo manuals. Here is his interface for the previously-mentioned Kawa manual: https://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/gsoc-2017-js-example/kawa/Strings.html#Concatenation-and-replacing I would love for someone to combine Mathieu's code with your scroll-watcher and turn it into a separate library suitable for "book-style" sites (both ones generated from texinfo and otherwise). (Mathieu's code is GPLT, for what that is worth.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/O6OXNQ3NLHKPYLHTR7A7W6ZIKMKNTTAX/
[Bug 1570047] Review Request: prestopalette - A tool for artists to create harmonious color palettes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570047 --- Comment #9 from William Moreno --- Please re upload the src.rpm https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6133/26476133/prestopalette-0.1.31-1.fc29.src.rpm Not Found The requested URL /work/tasks/6133/26476133/prestopalette-0.1.31-1.fc29.src.rpm was not found on this server. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3VL3T4US333SRWRNI4K57CATKJFGPVYX/
[Bug 1571742] Review Request: js-viewport-navigation - Scrolling viewport contents navigation menu for web pages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571742 --- Comment #3 from Per Bothner --- I noted a minor glitch: https://github.com/danieljrmay/viewport-navigation/issues/3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VQGIGQADCJMDAE6F2MRKK5ZIIKMIT62Z/
[Bug 1571742] Review Request: js-viewport-navigation - Scrolling viewport contents navigation menu for web pages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571742 Per Bothner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@bothner.com --- Comment #2 from Per Bothner --- Some preliminary informal comments, based on just the GitHub project. These are my personal opinions/suggestions as a Fedora user, not a Fedora packing expert. * I think you need to make a case for why this should be in Fedora. It would be helpful if you linked to some web-page that actually uses the library - i.e. some real-life non-trivial web-page (with non-trivial styling). Perhaps documentation or the home page for some other Fedora package (or proposed package). * How does your navigator deal with multiple pages? It seems it can only be useful for navigating a single-page document. This limits its usefulness. For comparison, I wrote a side-bar navigator for Kawa that handles navigation both between and within pages. For example try: https://www.gnu.org/software/kawa/Strings.html#Immutable-String-Constructors . It might be useful to combine your logic for watching scrolling into my side-bar navigator. * Using the GPL license for a JavaScript library means (I believe) that all of the JavaScript on a web page has to be released under the GPL. This may be a concern for some people, and limit take-up - and possibly its suitability for Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WQU3IXZJQFIHOQQ6OP6FA755FG4G4S7Z/
[Bug 1570047] Review Request: prestopalette - A tool for artists to create harmonious color palettes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570047 William Moreno changed: What|Removed |Added CC||williamjmore...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|williamjmore...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JT2K4527JC45XJ3CD76HALHNHHIMM42N/
[Bug 1573638] Review Request: python-dotenv - Add .env support to your django/flask apps in development
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573638 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Assignee|athoscribe...@gmail.com |zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Thanks for taking the sponsorship! Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Z3KQJ5ACTZFY7PU4UWXJIA6QZR7HYZTE/
[Bug 1579528] Review Request: tflogger - TensorFlow event logger
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579528 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VSKKFKEAJZHJANMTFMPDVISHGYWPN54I/
[Bug 1579528] Review Request: tflogger - TensorFlow event logger
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579528 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- tflogger-0.1.1-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-32e4f13343 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QJHSOKLZUHXBXDSLMM4YYMGQJ5GC74MY/
[Bug 1573638] Review Request: python-dotenv - Add .env support to your django/flask apps in development
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573638 Athos Ribeiro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Athos Ribeiro --- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR: I started the process with Fernando and will aponsor him as soon as he complete some tasks to show he is able to apply the Fedora Packaging Guidelines when working on Fedora packages. He will be either performing a few informal package reviews or applying some patches in packages I maintain in our next iterations (his choice). When he is done, I will approve this package if Robert does not do it until then. Robert, Thanks for the review, feel free to take the ticket and finish the review if you want :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KIJDIEACAJMJ3IGYP4UU6NKIQBF4QI3G/
[Bug 1573638] Review Request: python-dotenv - Add .env support to your django/flask apps in development
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573638 Athos Ribeiro changed: What|Removed |Added CC||athoscribe...@gmail.com Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|athoscribe...@gmail.com Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SO44VOCSLTGIZBDVRN7NJDOWUZDPXKYA/
[Bug 1517451] Review Request: gnome-internet-radio-locator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517451 --- Comment #15 from o...@gnome.org --- 1. I have removed %post and built and published 1.1.3-3 for Fedora Core 28. Spec URL: https://people.gnome.org/~ole/testing/SPECS/gnome-internet-radio-locator.spec SRPM URL: https://people.gnome.org/~ole/testing/SRPMS/gnome-internet-radio-locator-1.1.3-3.fc28.src.rpm 2. I prefer to keep the style for %changelog comments since version 0.1.0. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QVRWU6CPE2RNSOCDNW2V3DLD3EV7TAIO/
[Bug 1545479] Review Request: hcc- Heterogeneous C++ Compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479 --- Comment #3 from Tom Stellard --- I'm not going to push a ROCm 1.6 version of hcc into Fedora. I have updated the spec file locally to ROCm 1.7, but I would need to update rocm-runtime and libhsakmt in Fedora to ROCm 1.7, before I can it to Fedora. ROCm 1.8 hcc will probably not happen in Fedora because AMD have not released a special version of libhsakmt that works with the upstream kernel like they did for 1.6 and 1.7. If you are interested in testing, I have a copr with most of the ROCm 1.7 packages (it's basically hiptensorflow plus all its dependencies) if you want to take a look: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/tstellar/rocm-1.7-userspace/ Note that since I haven't packaged the upstream thunk yet for ROCm 1.7, you will need to install the 'official' AMD kernel and thunk from this copr to get it to work: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/tstellar/rocm-1.7-amd/ But on the plus side, with the AMD kernel you will get dGPU and Vega support. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OCIY6GRBM5TLJ6WQ4U7AU43WASW5KMO5/
[Bug 1578107] Review Request: python-priority - A pure-Python implementation of the HTTP/ 2 priority tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578107 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- python-priority-1.3.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-666563d2eb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DOZUCA6ZJW4ZDQJZY7FQDIS3YNSDFZ3H/
[Bug 1578107] Review Request: python-priority - A pure-Python implementation of the HTTP/ 2 priority tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578107 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XAA3BCAIJ4Y2RJYRO3XWOR6F6VOOTV7K/
[Bug 1543578] Review Request: php-deepdiver-zipstreamer - package maintained fork of PHPZipStreamer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543578 Christian Glombek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-05-18 12:18:53 --- Comment #18 from Christian Glombek --- rawhide's been build, f27 and f28 branches have been requested -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/B3ZZSLFLRIPLPSR6ZAVFCJST6QJ7VAH5/
[Bug 1578108] Review Request: python-towncrier - Building newsfiles for your project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578108 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XD4FDUXZWG3IQGFH37J3BOO6DHFFOEFR/
[Bug 1578108] Review Request: python-towncrier - Building newsfiles for your project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578108 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- python-towncrier-17.8.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7db4f93052 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WT2YFXIQFV2PEKR5VWBXCHAEJPTFPF2Z/
[Bug 1578093] Review Request: python-constantly - Symbolic constants in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578093 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- python-constantly-15.1.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-767dd39f87 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/B3FHPACGUZDMLWDD4WMFWG57YEIDQQHM/
[Bug 1578093] Review Request: python-constantly - Symbolic constants in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578093 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2JLRADU54G2MHLJRABS2FCRKTNOQKU56/
[Bug 1578107] Review Request: python-priority - A pure-Python implementation of the HTTP/ 2 priority tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578107 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-priority -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/B6XMXZO3JK5OELHUWWBW2WEPRCQYMZGR/
[Bug 1578108] Review Request: python-towncrier - Building newsfiles for your project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578108 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-towncrier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UGUUL7QY56TPMTGMIBOU3BKZNQUU3E7F/
[Bug 1579416] Review Request: ghc-bdcs - Tools for managing a content store
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579416 Chris Lumens changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-05-18 11:07:55 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BHSE5I2HOAJ7N3NTK645Q2JNWHLJA6RU/
[Bug 1578093] Review Request: python-constantly - Symbolic constants in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578093 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-constantly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YIQUDWRUKUXLODI3Y7OBSSZNXBAXL7AI/
[Bug 1579523] Review Request: RxCpp - Reactive Extensions for C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579523 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/RxCpp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/M3ESRNRNSGUWLYEGFXU4A7BC6ZHGW36L/
[Bug 1578564] Review Request: golang-github-mdlayher-wifi - Provides access to IEEE 802.11 WiFi device actions and statistics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578564 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KWYSXVACHVT73WELNHFJLCIF6BETCBL4/
[Bug 1579789] Review Request: python-elasticsearch-logger - Elasticsearch Log handler for the logging library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579789
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- License:Apache2
The correct license shorthand for Apache is "ASL 2.0"
- If you plan to only support F28 and later, you can use the new
%?python_enable_dependency_generator to replace the Requires. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnablingPythonGenerators#How_To_Test
- Use macros and use a more meaningful name for your archive with:
Source0:
https://github.com/cmanaha/python-elasticsearch-logger/archive/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
- Install the license with %licerse, not %doc:
%doc README.rst
%license LICENSE.md
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %license.
Note: License file LICENSE.md is not marked as %license
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 12 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review
/python-elasticsearch-logger/review-python-elasticsearch-
logger/licensecheck.txt
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final pr
[Bug 1573997] Review Request: golang-github-jedisct1-xsecretbox - Go implementation of crypto_secretbox_xchacha20poly1305
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573997 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JXSC3J6TDVRLYEUOLATZR5U75K5NU6KZ/
[Bug 1573997] Review Request: golang-github-jedisct1-xsecretbox - Go implementation of crypto_secretbox_xchacha20poly1305
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573997 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-jedisct1-xsecretbox-0-0.1.20180518git7a679c0.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-b997ba3241 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HADIDGLUT2ZSRKLTHJJF7UPDXG4QFZGT/
[Bug 1579528] Review Request: tflogger - TensorFlow event logger
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579528 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tflogger -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/64YU7EFV73C4IV2Q5LONXEJVDJ3FGHCE/
[Bug 1579523] Review Request: RxCpp - Reactive Extensions for C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579523
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Thanks I didn't know that trick, turns out the build also use all my free disk
space on /.
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache
(v2.0)". 313 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/RxCpp/review-
RxCpp/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 51200 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in RxCpp-
devel
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
[Bug 1578107] Review Request: python-priority - A pure-Python implementation of the HTTP/ 2 priority tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578107
Björn 'besser82' Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 14 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/besser82/fedora/review/1578107-python-priority/licensecheck.txt
---> Name of license in the spec file is technically invalid, correct
in its meaning:
s!License:MIT License!License:MIT!
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
python2-priority , python3-priority
---> Not needed. Python packages are stand alone.
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[
[Bug 1579528] Review Request: tflogger - TensorFlow event logger
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579528
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- You should use a single "=" here
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} == %{version}-%{release}
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 20 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/tflogger/review-tflogger/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
tflogger-devel
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]
[Bug 1579523] Review Request: RxCpp - Reactive Extensions for C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579523 --- Comment #3 from Björn 'besser82' Esser --- You can download all built rpms in the needed arch from the scratch build on Koji and run `fedora-review -p -n RxCpp` from the same dir, where you downloaded the files into. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5OKQLWIGCW3RYIS7SKVVEY3WTSQP5WGV/
[Bug 1573991] Review Request: golang-github-aead-chacha20 - ChaCha20 and XChaCha20 stream ciphers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573991 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Q7GO7AUQCQK4PPEB4K3CCE3THUTDSAVA/
[Bug 1573991] Review Request: golang-github-aead-chacha20 - ChaCha20 and XChaCha20 stream ciphers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573991 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-aead-chacha20-0-0.1.20180517gite253874.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e8bd8fcb9f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PKAXAYID63RVFYFMOIBFZAO4D7GOFIJ6/
[Bug 1579523] Review Request: RxCpp - Reactive Extensions for C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579523 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zebo...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - AUTHORS.txt should be %doc, not %license - I had to disable mt for the review cause I don't have enough memory for it. - Build stops in fedora-review with the following error: [ 88%] Building CXX object build/test/CMakeFiles/rxcpp_test_lift.dir/operators/lift.cpp.o cd /builddir/build/BUILD/RxCpp-4.0.0/build/test && /usr/lib64/ccache/c++ -DCATCH_CONFIG_MAIN -I/builddir/build/BUILD/RxCpp-4.0.0/Rx/v2/src -I/usr/include/catch -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong -grecord-gcc-switches -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -DNDEBUG -Wall -Wextra -Werror -Wunused -std=gnu++11 -o CMakeFiles/rxcpp_test_lift.dir/operators/lift.cpp.o -c /builddir/build/BUILD/RxCpp-4.0.0/Rx/v2/test/operators/lift.cpp make[2]: *** [build/test/CMakeFiles/rxcpp_test_lift.dir/build.make:66: build/test/CMakeFiles/rxcpp_test_lift.dir/operators/lift.cpp.o] Error 1 I'll retry later with a clean chroot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/74VCVE6ATYTPJY6MHRAEFU7WLZCIZNYT/
[Bug 1577690] Review Request: ignition-cmake - CMake modules to be used by the Ignition projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1577690 --- Comment #2 from Rich Mattes --- Thanks for the quick review! I'll make sure to remove the shebang in cpplint.py when I import the package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EWSOIKCZ6A36RASV2OM3CMACXIMQCBH2/
[Bug 1578108] Review Request: python-towncrier - Building newsfiles for your project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578108
Björn 'besser82' Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 30 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/besser82/fedora/review/1578108-python-towncrier/licensecheck.txt
---> License tag looks good.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
python2-towncrier , python3-towncrier
---> Not needed. Python packages are stand alone.
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages,
[Bug 1578093] Review Request: python-constantly - Symbolic constants in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578093
Björn 'besser82' Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 10 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/besser82/fedora/review/1578093-python-
constantly/licensecheck.txt
---> License tag looks good.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
python2-constantly , python3-constantly
---> Not needed. Python packages are stand alone.
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[Bug 1578108] Review Request: python-towncrier - Building newsfiles for your project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578108 Björn 'besser82' Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||besse...@fedoraproject.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|besse...@fedoraproject.org Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NC2QHFJQFOISXP4IPTEF4KS2E6G3MUDH/
[Bug 1578107] Review Request: python-priority - A pure-Python implementation of the HTTP/ 2 priority tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578107 Björn 'besser82' Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||besse...@fedoraproject.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|besse...@fedoraproject.org Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Q47JMROEY7HHDRMENQ77GRDYYPMZY4SM/
[Bug 1578098] Review Request: python-hpack - Pure-Python HPACK header compression
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578098 Björn 'besser82' Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||besse...@fedoraproject.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|besse...@fedoraproject.org Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WGD6SZITYUPV6X3XW5JCREGTY5DWZO7K/
[Bug 1578103] Review Request: python-hyperlink - A featureful, immutable, and correct URL for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578103 Björn 'besser82' Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||besse...@fedoraproject.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|besse...@fedoraproject.org Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2MAOVWH6GQFQ5ULUOIIYE2EQJJEB7HMU/
[Bug 1578099] Review Request: python-hyperframe - HTTP/ 2 framing layer for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578099 Björn 'besser82' Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||besse...@fedoraproject.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|besse...@fedoraproject.org Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EET5G3SGO66IQ5N7HA72CNIB7VMMM6IF/
[Bug 1578101] Review Request: python-h2 - HTTP/ 2 State-Machine based protocol implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578101 Björn 'besser82' Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||besse...@fedoraproject.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|besse...@fedoraproject.org Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4JYLFDPGEOM6R7YVS7JTCLEM5TYBOSWZ/
[Bug 1578093] Review Request: python-constantly - Symbolic constants in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578093 Björn 'besser82' Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||besse...@fedoraproject.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|besse...@fedoraproject.org Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZGEGEFTK4LUIHBFYGSMLCEY7D6J5V6DG/
[Bug 1579789] Review Request: python-elasticsearch-logger - Elasticsearch Log handler for the logging library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579789 --- Comment #1 from Jan Kaluža --- Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=27037133 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UM7FFKTZYAU2TBMFXN6V6UJYC7WZADK5/
[Bug 1579789] New: Review Request: python-elasticsearch-logger - Elasticsearch Log handler for the logging library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579789 Bug ID: 1579789 Summary: Review Request: python-elasticsearch-logger - Elasticsearch Log handler for the logging library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jkal...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://jkaluza.fedorapeople.org/python-elasticsearch-logger.spec SRPM URL: http://jkaluza.fedorapeople.org/python-elasticsearch-logger-1.0.0-1.src.rpm Description: This library provides an Elasticsearch logging appender compatible with the python standard logging library. Fedora Account System Username: jkaluza -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/J7VVP7FBH5WL3KJPPQ6CIMFECGNBXKKX/
[Bug 1545479] Review Request: hcc- Heterogeneous C++ Compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479 --- Comment #2 from Felix Schwarz --- Just a random note: Do you plan to update the spec to the latest HCC version/roc 1.7/1.8 in this review request or would you like to do that after the package got reviewed? (Thanks for working on this btw :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7CCFS5SSX33SHBEINJYD6GCJO5GOTYRF/
