[Bug 1899298] Review Request: python-pagure-messages - A schema package for messages sent by pagure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899298 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-b2d9ed864e has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1899298] Review Request: python-pagure-messages - A schema package for messages sent by pagure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899298 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4a81277172 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1899298] Review Request: python-pagure-messages - A schema package for messages sent by pagure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899298 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-12-08 01:37:18 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-9afa1d1530 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905277] Request for Package Review & Inclusion: Diffuse Now Has an Active Python 3 Fork
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905277 --- Comment #1 from niohiani --- I should also note that the nemo-extensions package contains a useful plugin for the nemo file manager, called nemo-compare. It supports numerous diff utilities (including Diffuse), yet the maintainer for said package seems to believe that Meld should be treated as a dependency for this plugin, when it is absolutely functional without it. Simply removing "Requires:meld" from the spec file for the package in question would resolve the issue, but my bug report was immediately closed with "WONTFIX", when the maintainer doesn't even seem to understand the problem. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905281 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
needinfo canceled: [Bug 1544239] Review Request: unison248 - There is a new incompatible version of unison240
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Package Review has canceled Package Review 's request for dper...@gmail.com's needinfo: Bug 1544239: Review Request: unison248 - There is a new incompatible version of unison240 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544239 --- Comment #6 from Package Review --- This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1904832] Review Request: python-pep562 - Backport of PEP 562
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904832 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-214f645be0 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-214f645be0 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1904833] Review Request: python-django-jsonfield-backport - Backport of the cross-DB JSONField model and form fields from Django 3.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904833 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-214f645be0 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-214f645be0 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905277] New: Request for Package Review & Inclusion: Diffuse Now Has an Active Python 3 Fork
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905277 Bug ID: 1905277 Summary: Request for Package Review & Inclusion: Diffuse Now Has an Active Python 3 Fork Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: notinsideofhereiamnotins...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description: The Diffuse diff utility now has an active Python 3 fork, which should be included in Fedora repositories. Additional info: I've been hosting builds in a copr repo for now, but this has always been a reliable and quick diff utility, and seeing that it was originally available in the official repos for Fedora, I believe that it should be made available to all Fedora users again, now that it has been ported to Python 3. Current spec file: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/niohiani/Diffuse-Python-3/fedora-33-x86_64/01817739-diffuse/diffuse3-meson.spec Latest build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/niohiani/Diffuse-Python-3/build/1817739/ I'm relatively new to packaging for Fedora, but I would have no problem maintaining the packaging for Diffuse. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905273] New: Review Request: cjson - Ultralightweight JSON parser in ANSI C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905273 Bug ID: 1905273 Summary: Review Request: cjson - Ultralightweight JSON parser in ANSI C Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/cjson.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/cjson-1.7.14-1.fc33.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/DaveGamble/cJSON Description: cJSON aims to be the dumbest possible parser that you can get your job done with. It's a single file of C, and a single header file. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5749 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint cjson-1.7.14-1.fc33.src.rpm cjson.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Ultralightweight -> Ultra lightweight, Ultra-lightweight, Ultralight weight 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint cjson* cjson.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Ultralightweight -> Ultra lightweight, Ultra-lightweight, Ultralight weight 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905260] Review Request: yascreen - Yet Another Screen Library (lib(n)curses alternative)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905260 Boian Bonev changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Boian Bonev --- This library is a dependency of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905270 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905270] New: Review Request: bpfmon - Traffic monitor for BPF expression/iptables rule
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905270 Bug ID: 1905270 Summary: Review Request: bpfmon - Traffic monitor for BPF expression/iptables rule Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: bbo...@ipacct.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://github.com/bbonev/bpfmon/raw/master/fedora/bpfmon.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/bbonev/bpfmon/raw/fedora/fedora/bpfmon-2.49-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Traffic monitor for BPF expression/iptables rule Fedora Account System Username: bbonev1 This depends on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905260 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905260] New: Review Request: yascreen - Yet Another Screen Library (lib(n)curses alternative)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905260 Bug ID: 1905260 Summary: Review Request: yascreen - Yet Another Screen Library (lib(n)curses alternative) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: bbo...@ipacct.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://github.com/bbonev/yascreen/raw/master/fedora/yascreen.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/bbonev/yascreen/raw/fedora/fedora/yascreen-1.85-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Yet Another Screen Library (lib(n)curses alternative) Fedora Account System Username: bbonev1 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=56884926 scratch build before fixing the generated .pc file rpmlint complains about stdio, stdout, wcwidth (libc symbols) and linenoise (name of another project) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905189] Review Request: python-stone - The Official Api Spec Language for Dropbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905189 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2020-12-07 18:10:15 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905189] Review Request: python-stone - The Official Api Spec Language for Dropbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905189 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-stone -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905189] Review Request: python-stone - The Official Api Spec Language for Dropbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905189 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- I agree WRT the tests. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905189] Review Request: python-stone - The Official Api Spec Language for Dropbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905189
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Package APPROVED.
Since you are already pulling in pytest-runner, consider running the tests in
%check.
However, it seems the tests require pytest < 5, so maybe this is not a good
idea?
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Expat License", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Expat
License".
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[?]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
[-]: Description and summary
[Bug 1904172] Review Request: endlessh - SSH tarpit that slowly sends an endless banner
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904172 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-e034e4c49a has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-e034e4c49a \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e034e4c49a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1897961] Review Request: R-conflicted - An Alternative Conflict Resolution Strategy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1897961 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-d36f78f45f has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-d36f78f45f \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d36f78f45f See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1897619] Review Request: rubygem-asciidoctor-diagram - Asciidoctor diagramming extension
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1897619 Christopher Brown changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(jsmith.fedora@gma ||il.com) --- Comment #3 from Christopher Brown --- Hi Jared, anything else that needs doing here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1350884] Review Request: mspgcc - Rebase of GCC for the MSP430 to TI / Red Hat upstream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350884 --- Comment #59 from Brandon Nielsen --- I cannot recreate s390x failures locally, even tests work fine. I have no idea what the issue is on koji. I experimented some with building on copr but it seems to timeout even with the max possible value[0]. I also poked at the armhfp test failues some more. They're segfaults (in qemu?), not regular test failures. I again have no idea what the issue is. I tried patching out the tests that segfault and then started running into tests that hang indefintely (eg. gdb.base/utf8-identifiers.exp). I think the best course of action is to disable tests for armhfp, and possibly s390x as well to work around timeouts there? My last remaining question is why I cannot get all packages to install by doing a `dnf install msp430-elf-toolchain` as described in comment 35. I thought the issue was the wrong requires on the main package, but I've corrected those in the latest spec[1] (lines 50-53) and it still doesn't work. Any thoughts? [0] - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nielsenb/msp430-development-tools/build/1808709/ [1] - https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nielsenb/msp430-development-tools/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01807519-msp430-elf-toolchain/msp430-elf-toolchain.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905189] Review Request: python-stone - The Official Api Spec Language for Dropbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905189 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- Thanks. Addressed the above. SRPM: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/python-stone/python-stone-3.2.1-2.fc33.src.rpm SPEC: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/python-stone/python-stone.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1897961] Review Request: R-conflicted - An Alternative Conflict Resolution Strategy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1897961 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-a2186e98bf has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-a2186e98bf \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a2186e98bf See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1904172] Review Request: endlessh - SSH tarpit that slowly sends an endless banner
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904172 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-4b377f8a28 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-4b377f8a28 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-4b377f8a28 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905189] Review Request: python-stone - The Official Api Spec Language for Dropbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905189
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok ---
Doesn't build, needs to BR python3-pytest-runner:
+ /usr/bin/python3 setup.py build '--executable=/usr/bin/python3 -s'
...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/builddir/build/BUILD/stone-3.2.1/setup.py", line 39, in
dist = setup(
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/setuptools/__init__.py", line 152, in
setup
_install_setup_requires(attrs)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/setuptools/__init__.py", line 147, in
_install_setup_requires
dist.fetch_build_eggs(dist.setup_requires)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py", line 673, in
fetch_build_eggs
resolved_dists = pkg_resources.working_set.resolve(
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 764,
in resolve
dist = best[req.key] = env.best_match(
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 1049,
in best_match
return self.obtain(req, installer)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 1061,
in obtain
return installer(requirement)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py", line 732, in
fetch_build_egg
return fetch_build_egg(self, req)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/setuptools/installer.py", line 68, in
fetch_build_egg
return _legacy_fetch_build_egg(dist, req)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/setuptools/installer.py", line 51, in
_legacy_fetch_build_egg
return cmd.easy_install(req)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py",
line 663, in easy_install
raise DistutilsError(msg)
distutils.errors.DistutilsError: Could not find suitable distribution for
Requirement.parse('pytest-runner')
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905189] Review Request: python-stone - The Official Api Spec Language for Dropbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905189
--- Comment #1 from Miro Hrončok ---
Spec sanity:
> %{?python_provide:%python_provide python3-%{pypi_name}}
If you only target F33+, you can drop it. If you also target F32, please use
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_the_py_provides_macro
instead.
> %description -n python3-%{pypi_name}
> ${summary}
That seems like a typo (note the $).
> %{python3_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}
> %{python3_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}-%{version}-py%{python3_version}.egg-info
I recommend adding training slashes to indicate and assert those are
directories.
Running Fedora Review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905189] Review Request: python-stone - The Official Api Spec Language for Dropbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905189 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mhron...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mhron...@redhat.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905189] New: Review Request: python-stone - The Official Api Spec Language for Dropbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905189 Bug ID: 1905189 Summary: Review Request: python-stone - The Official Api Spec Language for Dropbox Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: gw...@protonmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 1905175 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description: The Official Api Spec Language for Dropbox SRPM: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/python-stone/python-stone-3.2.1-1.fc33.src.rpm SPEC: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/python-stone/python-stone.spec Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905175 [Bug 1905175] F34FailsToInstall: python3-dropbox -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1901306] Review Request: tlpi - Utilities to display namespaces and control groups
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901306 Göran Uddeborg changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #2 from Göran Uddeborg --- As indicated in the %description, in the beginning of namespaces_of.go there is a comment which could be useful for the end user. For the other programs the corresponding explanations are much shorter, short enough I could include it in extenso in the package description. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905148] New: Review Request: rust-colorful - Terminal coloring library for Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905148 Bug ID: 1905148 Summary: Review Request: rust-colorful - Terminal coloring library for Rust Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: cku...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ckuehl/rust-colorful/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01817423-rust-colorful/rust-colorful.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ckuehl/rust-colorful/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01817423-rust-colorful/rust-colorful-0.2.1-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Terminal coloring library for Rust Fedora Account System Username: ckuehl --- Hello, This is one of my first packages for Fedora and I am seeking sponsorship to include this crate and a few others that my team develops or depends on. Successful builds are shown in the Copr frontend: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ckuehl/rust-colorful/build/1817423/ with the exception of the armhfp chroot; a number of my builds for that chroot have been failing during chroot construction due to lack of disk space. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905145] New: Review Request: rust-codicon - Rust traits for encoding and decoding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905145 Bug ID: 1905145 Summary: Review Request: rust-codicon - Rust traits for encoding and decoding Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: cku...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ckuehl/rust-codicon/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01817420-rust-codicon/rust-codicon.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ckuehl/rust-codicon/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01817420-rust-codicon/rust-codicon-3.0.0-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Rust traits for encoding and decoding Fedora Account System Username: ckuehl --- Hello, This is one of my first packages for Fedora and I am seeking sponsorship to include this crate and a few others that my team develops or depends on. I am a member of the team upstream that develops this library. Successful builds are shown in the Copr frontend here: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ckuehl/rust-codicon/build/1817420/ with the exception of the armhfp chroot; a number of my builds for that chroot have been failing during chroot construction due to lack of disk space. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1905143] New: Review Request: rust-iocuddle - Safely call ioctls from Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905143 Bug ID: 1905143 Summary: Review Request: rust-iocuddle - Safely call ioctls from Rust Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: cku...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ckuehl/rust-iocuddle/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01817421-rust-iocuddle/rust-iocuddle.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ckuehl/rust-iocuddle/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01817421-rust-iocuddle/rust-iocuddle-0.1.1-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Safely call ioctls from Rust Fedora Account System Username: ckuehl --- Hello, This is one of my first packages for Fedora and I am seeking sponsorship to include this crate and a few others that my team develops or depends on. I am a member of the team upstream that develops this library. Successful builds are shown in the Copr frontend: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ckuehl/rust-iocuddle/build/1817421/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309
--- Comment #1 from Silvie Chlupova ---
Just a few things:
> Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
%python_provide macro still works for compatibility reasons but it is
deprecated and should not be used and packagers should replace it with an
appropriate %py_provides call. Also, packages must not have dependencies on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix and you have in your spec
file BuildRequires: python-setuptools.
> Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
See section Issues of this comment. Python packages must not contain
%{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
Note: Package contains %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
See: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/782
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "GNU General Public License, Version 2", "Unknown or
generated". 8 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/schlupov/1899309-python-templated-
dictionary/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[!]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from
[Bug 1902632] Review Request: python-imbalanced-learn - A Python Package to Tackle the Imbalanced Datasets in Machine Learning
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902632 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-imbalanced-learn -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802171] Review Request: restraint - tool designed to execute tasks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802171 Theodoros Apazoglou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2020-12-07 13:46:47 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1802171] Review Request: restraint - tool designed to execute tasks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802171 Theodoros Apazoglou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tapaz...@redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Theodoros Apazoglou --- We will not continue with the process of packaging restraint to the Fedora due to team's capacity. Thank you -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1904833] Review Request: python-django-jsonfield-backport - Backport of the cross-DB JSONField model and form fields from Django 3.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904833 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-214f645be0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-214f645be0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1904832] Review Request: python-pep562 - Backport of PEP 562
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904832 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2020-214f645be0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-214f645be0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1902632] Review Request: python-imbalanced-learn - A Python Package to Tackle the Imbalanced Datasets in Machine Learning
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902632 --- Comment #5 from Iztok Fister Jr. --- Thanks very much Aniket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1902632] Review Request: python-imbalanced-learn - A Python Package to Tackle the Imbalanced Datasets in Machine Learning
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902632 Aniket Pradhan changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Aniket Pradhan --- That's great if you can package the latest version. Just a bit small nits, 1. Please leave a small comment in the spec, about why you're disabling the tests. 2. If possible, please report the issues in the tests to upstream, so that they can patch it up. 3. I believe there are other tests in the project directory, so I guess there's no need to manually specify a particular directory and let pytest discover the tests automatically. Other than that, the spec is amazing, and I am approving the review. After doing the above changes, you can manually proceed with the repo creation! Good Luck :D -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1902632] Review Request: python-imbalanced-learn - A Python Package to Tackle the Imbalanced Datasets in Machine Learning
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902632 --- Comment #3 from Iztok Fister Jr. --- A new version is available on GH. SPEC: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/firefly-cpp/imbalanced-learn-rpm/main/python-imbalanced-learn.spec SRPM: https://github.com/firefly-cpp/imbalanced-learn-rpm/raw/main/python-imbalanced-learn-0.7.0-1.fc33.src.rpm Latest koji report: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=56955971 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1899309] Review Request: python-templated-dictionary - Dictionary with Jinja2 expansion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899309 Silvie Chlupova changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
