[Bug 1919639] Review Request: DOSBox-X - DOS/x86 emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919639 --- Comment #41 from Robert --- I made another minor change, I replaced the setcap command with the %caps macro. You can find the updated spec and srpm file here: https://github.com/rderooy/dosbox-x-rpm F34 build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=65836560 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944658] Review Request: htppu - Hessu's Tampa Ping-Pong conversd URO modified version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944658 Zdenek Dohnal changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(jskarvad@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #4 from Zdenek Dohnal --- Jarda, do you know about the reason why /etc/htppu/convers.conf is not readable for others? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1944658] Review Request: htppu - Hessu's Tampa Ping-Pong conversd URO modified version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944658 Zdenek Dohnal changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zdoh...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Zdenek Dohnal --- Giving review+ based on Richard's review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948882] New: Review Request: python-mujson - Use the fastest JSON functions available at import time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948882 Bug ID: 1948882 Summary: Review Request: python-mujson - Use the fastest JSON functions available at import time Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: c...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/carlwgeorge/reviews/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02130287-python-mujson/python-mujson.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/carlwgeorge/reviews/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02130287-python-mujson/python-mujson-1.4-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: mujson lets python libraries make use of the most performant JSON functions available at import time. It is small, and does not itself implement any encoding or decoding functionality. Fedora Account System Username: carlwgeorge -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947685] Review Request: ocaml-atd - Static Types for Json APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947685
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Do you know why the atdj and atds META files are both empty?
- The comment on line 51, "No Scala compiler in Fedora", is incorrect. The
Scala compiler is available in the scala package.
- Would it be worthwhile to split atdgen-codec-runtime and atdgen-runtime out
as separate packages, so that consumers don't need to drag everything in to
run?
- The opam and dune-package files are in the main package. They are small
enough that that doesn't overly concern me, but they probably fit better in
the -devel subpackage.
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Ocaml:
[x]: This should never happen
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installe
[Bug 1945771] Review Request: weldr-client - command line utility for osbuild-composer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1945771 Brian Lane changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2021-04-12 22:22:22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947685] Review Request: ocaml-atd - Static Types for Json APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947685 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||loganje...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|loganje...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jerry James --- I will take this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948777] New: Review Request: vim-editorconfig - EditorConfig Vim Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948777 Bug ID: 1948777 Summary: Review Request: vim-editorconfig - EditorConfig Vim Plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: c...@musicinmybrain.net QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/vim-editorconfig.spec SRPM URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/vim-editorconfig-1.1.1-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: This is an EditorConfig plugin for Vim. Fedora Account System Username: music COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/music/vim-editorconfig/ Koji builds: F35: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=65815485 F34: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=65815493 F33: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=65815494 F32: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=65815495 EPEL8: (built only in COPR, needs editorconfig dependency branched) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1919639] Review Request: DOSBox-X - DOS/x86 emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919639 --- Comment #40 from Robert --- I have done a new build with the suggested %doc packaging changes. You can find the updated spec and srpm file here: https://github.com/rderooy/dosbox-x-rpm F34 build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=65817372 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947670] Review Request: monocypher - Boring crypto that simply works
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947670
--- Comment #2 from Patrik Polakovič ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 from comment #1)
> - Please use lowercase for monocypher
>
> - This needs to be arch specific (add isa):
>
> Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
>
> - make %{?_smp_mflags} → %make_build
>
> - Static libraries are generally not packaged, remove it at the end of
> install:
>
> rm -v %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/*.a
Fixed the blockers you pointed out, and also some that one other person pointed
out on IRC. Updated my initial bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947670] Review Request: monocypher - Boring crypto that simply works
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947670 Patrik Polakovič changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/ppolakov/b51d20a4ee53d42719bbb7e280dd9370/raw/401dbf2668947ca657b983aa88fe99b883375956/monocypher.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/patrikp/Monocypher/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02130042-monocypher/monocypher-3.1.2-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: Monocypher is an easy to use cryptographic library. It provides functions for authenticated encryption, hashing, password hashing and key derivation, key exchange, and public key signatures. It is: - Small. Monocypher contains under 2000 lines of code, small enough to allow audits. The binaries can be under 50KB, small enough for many embedded targets. - Easy to deploy. Just add monocypher.c and monocypher.h to your project. They compile as C99 or C++ and are dedicated to the public domain (CC0-1.0, alternatively 2-clause BSD). - Portable. There are no dependencies, not even on libc. - Honest. The API is small, consistent, and cannot fail on correct input. - Direct. The abstractions are minimal. A developer with experience in applied cryptography can be productive in minutes. - Fast. The primitives are fast to begin with, and performance wasn't needlessly sacrificed. Monocypher holds up pretty well against Libsodium, despite being closer in size to TweetNaCl. Hello. This is my first package and I would be very thankful if somebody could review it. I am also in need of a sponsor. I have used rpmlint on the SPEC file, the Binary RPM, and the SRPM -- I am getting no errors and no warnings. I am also including a link for a successful koji build. Disclaimer: I am merely the packager, not the upstream maintainer. Fedora Account System Username: patrikp koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=65810208 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1906980] Review Request: highway - Efficient and performance-portable SIMD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906980 Ben Beasley changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@musicinmybrain.net --- Comment #7 from Ben Beasley --- Because my workstation is an antique, this fails to build in mock for me. > /usr/bin/cmake -D TEST_TARGET=hwy_test -D > TEST_EXECUTABLE=/builddir/build/BUILD/highway-0.11.1/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/tests/hwy_test > -D TEST_EXECUTOR= -D > TEST_WORKING_DIR=/builddir/build/BUILD/highway-0.11.1/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu > -D TEST_EXTRA_ARGS= -D TEST_PROPERTIES= -D TEST_PREFIX= -D TEST_SUFFIX= -D > NO_PRETTY_TYPES=FALSE -D NO_PRETTY_VALUES=FALSE -D TEST_LIST=hwy_test_TESTS > -D > CTEST_FILE=/builddir/build/BUILD/highway-0.11.1/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/hwy_test[1]_tests.cmake > -D TEST_DISCOVERY_TIMEOUT=60 -D TEST_XML_OUTPUT_DIR= -P > /usr/share/cmake/Modules/GoogleTestAddTests.cmake > CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake/Modules/GoogleTestAddTests.cmake:77 (message): > Error running test executable. > Path: > '/builddir/build/BUILD/highway-0.11.1/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/tests/hwy_test' > Result: Illegal instruction > Output: > > Call Stack (most recent call first): > /usr/share/cmake/Modules/GoogleTestAddTests.cmake:173 > (gtest_discover_tests_impl) You will need to make sure that tests using SIMD extensions that are not in the baseline for the architecture are not executed. SSE2 is inherently part of x86_64, and we can assume it in Fedora for i686 (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Update_i686_architectural_baseline_to_include_SSE2). Everything later needs to be checked by grepping /proc/cpuinfo, using the CLI tool from https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/google-cpu_features, or something similar. - It’s probably worth justifying shipping static libraries in a spec file comment. In this case it looks like there is simply no upstream support for building as a shared library. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1925323] Review Request: google-compute-engine - Top-level package for enabling Google Compute Engine features
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925323 --- Comment #13 from Dusty Mabe --- Just a note here that I think NetworkManager utilizes its own internal DHCP client implementation. I doubt the dhclient configuration that is getting dropped down by this RPM is even getting used. Here's an f34 vagrant box I just booted: ``` Apr 09 15:49:37 fedora NetworkManager[523]: [1617983377.5816] dhcp-init: Using DHCP client 'internal' ``` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948651] Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML-API - Wrapper around the C libyaml library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948651 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1948661 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948661 [Bug 1948661] Review Request: perl-YAML-PP-LibYAML - Faster parsing for YAML::PP -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948661] New: Review Request: perl-YAML-PP-LibYAML - Faster parsing for YAML::PP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948661 Bug ID: 1948661 Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-PP-LibYAML - Faster parsing for YAML::PP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jples...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-YAML-PP-LibYAML/perl-YAML-PP-LibYAML.spec SRPM URL: https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-YAML-PP-LibYAML/perl-YAML-PP-LibYAML-0.005-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: YAML::PP::LibYAML is a subclass of YAML::PP. Instead of using YAML::PP::Parser as a the backend parser, it uses YAML::PP::LibYAML::Parser which calls YAML::LibYAML::API, an XS wrapper around the C libyaml. Fedora Account System Username: jples...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948661] Review Request: perl-YAML-PP-LibYAML - Faster parsing for YAML::PP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948661 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1947805 Depends On||1948651 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947805 [Bug 1947805] perl-YAML-PP-0.027 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948651 [Bug 1948651] Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML-API - Wrapper around the C libyaml library -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1936080] Review Request: hikari - Stacking Wayland compositor with tiling capabilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936080 Bug 1936080 depends on bug 1910504, which changed state. Bug 1910504 Summary: Review Request: libucl - Universal configuration library parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910504 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1910504] Review Request: libucl - Universal configuration library parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910504 Timothée Floure changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2021-04-12 17:39:08 --- Comment #16 from Timothée Floure --- Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1947031] Review Request: bitwarden-cli - Command line password manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947031 --- Comment #8 from Michael Wojcik --- Excellent, I will speak with my project sponsor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948659] New: Review Request: gnome-kiosk - A pared down compositor and display server for single application deployments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948659 Bug ID: 1948659 Summary: Review Request: gnome-kiosk - A pared down compositor and display server for single application deployments Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rstr...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/gnome-kiosk/gnome-kiosk.spec SRPM URL: https://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/gnome-kiosk/gnome-kiosk-40.alpha-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: GNOME Kiosk provides a desktop enviroment suitable for fixed purpose, or single application deployments like wall displays and point-of-sale systems. Fedora Account System Username: rstrode -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948651] New: Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML-API - Wrapper around the C libyaml library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948651 Bug ID: 1948651 Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML-API - Wrapper around the C libyaml library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jples...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-YAML-LibYAML-API/perl-YAML-LibYAML-API.spec SRPM URL: https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-YAML-LibYAML-API/perl-YAML-LibYAML-API-0.012-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: This module provides a thin wrapper around the C libyaml API. Fedora Account System Username: jples...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1942104] Review Request: ghc-hosc - Haskell Open Sound Control
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942104 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-687551826b has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1933214] Review Request: ghc-data-binary-ieee754 - Parser/Serialiser for IEEE-754 floating-point values
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933214 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-687551826b has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1945771] Review Request: weldr-client - command line utility for osbuild-composer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1945771 --- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/weldr-client -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948161] Review Request: rust-sequoia-sq - Command-line frontends for Sequoia
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948161 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-sequoia-sq -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1936080] Review Request: hikari - Stacking Wayland compositor with tiling capabilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936080 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hikari -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1910504] Review Request: libucl - Universal configuration library parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910504 --- Comment #15 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libucl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948166] Review Request: rust-sequoia-sop - Stateless OpenPGP Command Line Interface using Sequoia
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948166 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-sequoia-sop -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1795461] Review Request: practrand - Software package for the Randon number generation & testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795461 --- Comment #22 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/practrand -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948163] Review Request: rust-sequoia-sqv - Simple OpenPGP signature verification program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948163 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-sequoia-sqv -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948159] Review Request: rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp - Reimplementation of RNP's interface using Sequoia
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948159 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948158] Review Request: rust-sequoia-net - Network services for OpenPGP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948158 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-sequoia-net -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948156] Review Request: rust-sequoia-autocrypt - Autocrypt support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948156 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-sequoia-autocrypt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948157] Review Request: rust-sequoia-ipc - Interprocess communication infrastructure for Sequoia
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948157 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-sequoia-ipc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948154] Review Request: rust-sequoia-openpgp - OpenPGP data types and associated machinery
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948154 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-sequoia-openpgp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948133] Review Request: rust-configparser - Simple configuration parsing utility with no dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948133 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-configparser -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948144] Review Request: rust-sha1collisiondetection - SHA-1 hash function with collision detection and mitigation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948144 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-sha1collisiondetection -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948142] Review Request: rust-memsec - Rust implementation of libsodium/utils
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948142 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-memsec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948152] Review Request: rust-ena - Union-find, congruence closure, and other unification code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948152 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-ena -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948153] Review Request: rust-rusqlite - Ergonomic wrapper for SQLite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948153 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-rusqlite -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948151] Review Request: rust-nettle - Rust bindings for the Nettle cryptographic library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948151 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-nettle -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948150] Review Request: rust-lalrpop - Convenient LR(1) parser generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948150 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-lalrpop -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948143] Review Request: rust-zbase32 - Implementation of zbase32
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948143 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-zbase32 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948145] Review Request: rust-nettle-sys - Low-level Rust bindings for the Nettle cryptographic library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948145 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-nettle-sys -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948136] Review Request: rust-fallible-streaming-iterator - Fallible streaming iteration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948136 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-fallible-streaming-iterator -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948134] Review Request: rust-dyn-clone - Clone trait that is object-safe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948134 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-dyn-clone -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948140] Review Request: rust-lalrpop-util - Runtime library for parsers generated by LALRPOP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948140 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-lalrpop-util -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948148] Review Request: rust-capnp-rpc - Implementation of the Cap'n Proto remote procedure call protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948148 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-capnp-rpc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948147] Review Request: rust-capnp-futures - Async serialization for Cap'n Proto messages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948147 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-capnp-futures -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948138] Review Request: rust-hashlink - HashMap-like containers with user-specified order
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948138 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-hashlink -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948135] Review Request: rust-capnp - Runtime library for Cap'n Proto data encoding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948135 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-capnp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948130] Review Request: rust-buffered-reader - Super-powered Reader
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948130 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-buffered-reader -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948128] Review Request: rust-ascii-canvas - Simple canvas for drawing lines and styled text and emitting to the terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948128 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-ascii-canvas -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1933395] Review Request: rust-confy - Boilerplate-free configuration management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933395 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-confy -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1910504] Review Request: libucl - Universal configuration library parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910504
Jan Staněk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #14 from Jan Staněk ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile
[Bug 1795461] Review Request: practrand - Software package for the Randon number generation & testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795461 --- Comment #21 from Jiri Hladky --- Hi Ankur, thanks a lot for the review! Good point about adding the comments to the spec file. The updated version is here: https://jhladky.fedorapeople.org/practrand.spec I have requested a new git repository here: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33487 Jirka -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1849706] Review Request: python-bluepyopt - The Blue Brain Python Optimisation Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849706 --- Comment #16 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Hi Anil, Yes, that's the current version that I've submitted for review. I'm also keeping these changes in a fork of your GitHub repo, but it's just easier to use fedorapeople to host the files so that they are easily accessible by the fedora-review tool. https://github.com/sanjayankur31/bluepyopt-rpm Cheers, Ankur -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948166] Review Request: rust-sequoia-sop - Stateless OpenPGP Command Line Interface using Sequoia
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948166 --- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33485 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33486 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948165] Review Request: rust-sequoia-keyring-linter - Linter for keyrings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948165 --- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33483 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33484 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948163] Review Request: rust-sequoia-sqv - Simple OpenPGP signature verification program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948163 --- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33481 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33482 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948161] Review Request: rust-sequoia-sq - Command-line frontends for Sequoia
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948161 --- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33479 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33480 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948159] Review Request: rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp - Reimplementation of RNP's interface using Sequoia
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948159 --- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini --- Exactly, that's to be expected, since without the PR, the packages conflict. Until the thunderbird patch is accepted, I'll modify the package slightly so that it doesn't conflict with thunderbird. https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33477 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33478 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948158] Review Request: rust-sequoia-net - Network services for OpenPGP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948158 --- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33475 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33476 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948157] Review Request: rust-sequoia-ipc - Interprocess communication infrastructure for Sequoia
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948157 --- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33473 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33474 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948156] Review Request: rust-sequoia-autocrypt - Autocrypt support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948156 --- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33471 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33472 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948154] Review Request: rust-sequoia-openpgp - OpenPGP data types and associated machinery
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948154 --- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33469 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33470 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948133] Review Request: rust-configparser - Simple configuration parsing utility with no dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948133 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- I've updated to 2.0.1 and added "chmod -x" ahead of importing. The issue with executable bits (and file mtimes of unix epoch 0 ???) has already been reported upstream: https://github.com/QEDK/configparser-rs/issues/15 Looks like the crate author has weird problems with their machine and / or publishing workflow. https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33467 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33468 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948144] Review Request: rust-sha1collisiondetection - SHA-1 hash function with collision detection and mitigation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948144 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- > - Shouldn't you add the license file here too: Yes, absolutely. I missed that. I've fixed it before the import. https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33465 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33466 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948142] Review Request: rust-memsec - Rust implementation of libsodium/utils
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948142 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- Ah, I missed that sequoia depends on memsec >=0.5, not ^0.5. I'll check if the packages build against 0.6.0, and update the package to 0.6.0 before importing if that works out. Thanks! https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33463 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33464 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948153] Review Request: rust-rusqlite - Ergonomic wrapper for SQLite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948153 --- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini --- sequoia-octopus-librnp required rusqlite 0.24.x, which is why I packaged a version matching that. I'll update to the latest version as soon as possible. https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33461 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33462 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948152] Review Request: rust-ena - Union-find, congruence closure, and other unification code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948152 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33459 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33460 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948150] Review Request: rust-lalrpop - Convenient LR(1) parser generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948150 --- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33455 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33456 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948143] Review Request: rust-zbase32 - Implementation of zbase32
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948143 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33453 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33454 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948145] Review Request: rust-nettle-sys - Low-level Rust bindings for the Nettle cryptographic library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948145 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33451 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33452 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948140] Review Request: rust-lalrpop-util - Runtime library for parsers generated by LALRPOP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948140 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33449 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33450 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948138] Review Request: rust-hashlink - HashMap-like containers with user-specified order
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948138 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33447 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33448 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948136] Review Request: rust-fallible-streaming-iterator - Fallible streaming iteration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948136 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33445 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33446 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948134] Review Request: rust-dyn-clone - Clone trait that is object-safe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948134 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33443 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33444 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948148] Review Request: rust-capnp-rpc - Implementation of the Cap'n Proto remote procedure call protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948148 --- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini --- I have not updated to 0.14.1 on purpose, because sequoia-ipc requires 0.13.x. I'll update the package as soon as possible. https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33441 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33442 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948147] Review Request: rust-capnp-futures - Async serialization for Cap'n Proto messages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948147 --- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini --- I have not updated to 0.14.1 on purpose, because sequoia-ipc requires 0.13.x. I'll update the package as soon as possible. https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33439 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33440 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948135] Review Request: rust-capnp - Runtime library for Cap'n Proto data encoding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948135 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- I have not updated to 0.14.1 on purpose, because sequoia-ipc requires 0.13.x. I'll update the package as soon as possible. https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33437 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33438 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948130] Review Request: rust-buffered-reader - Super-powered Reader
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948130 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33435 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33436 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1948128] Review Request: rust-ascii-canvas - Simple canvas for drawing lines and styled text and emitting to the terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948128 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33433 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33434 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1834731] Review Request: bitcoin - Peer to Peer Cryptographic Currency
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731 --- Comment #71 from Simone Caronni --- (In reply to Warren Togami from comment #70) > * Fedora's package should be named "bitcoincore". It should conflict with > "bitcoin". This would allow a popular feature-fork "bitcoinknots" would have > the same binary and configuration files and would thus conflict with these > other names. Fine, I will make the necessary adjustments. > * Ask FESCO to disallow any package named "bitcoin". There are multiple > reasons for this including unexpected upgrade conflicts with ways it was > previously packaged. It is also convenient for distributors to entirely > sidestep political fights over what has the right to be called "bitcoin". Fine for me as well. > * Less important: Another upstream concern is the risk of old bitcoin > binaries in the wild when Fedora goes EOL. The simplest safeguard is to ship > a final RPM update before a Fedora release's EOL that simply removes the > binary. We would ask FESCO if they're OK with this. I think this solves nothing (someone could still avoid installing the updates, fetching an old package or we could just miss a release retirement because of a person being on holiday, etc. Same applies for manually installed binaries, there is no way to enforce that. If you want it I'm fine with that, but again I think it's completely useless. > FYI: Years ago the linked library dependencies were a terrible risk of > causing consensus failure. It was beyond hypothetical risk, it actually > happened to unmaintained clones who failed to heed CVE's. That previous risk > was mostly mitigated by the removal of openssl. Upstream aims to eventually > eliminate the boost dependency which would further reduce risk. In any case > the risk is low enough now that it might be OK to ship in downstream > distros. I'm fine with this as well and will try to keep it in sync as possible with these dependencies slated for removal. > Don't mistake this as endorsement. I intend for upstream to > distribute a reproducibly built RPM that would Epoch override the Fedora > package for those who prefer static libraries exactly as tested by upstream. > Upstream opposes automatic upgrades of Bitcoin Core so this would be a way > for Fedora users to opt-in to upstream's recommended deployment method. This > isn't Fedora's concern but just explaining the line of reasoning here. I'm willing to keep it updated / in sync with upstream for the time being, so we can ensure a smooth upgrade path for whoever wants to use official binaries. Count me in if you think I should contribute to the upstream's SPEC file and SELinux policies. I'm fine also in integrating Guix as conditionals in the SPEC file to allow building from the same SPEC file (e.g. hosted upstream, non-guix build in fedora, higher epoch and guix build upstream). Are you ok with these points? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
