[Bug 1978861] Review Request: xsettingsd - Provides settings to X11 clients via the XSETTINGS specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978861 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #2 from Davide Cavalca --- Note: this will need to be unretired, I'll file a ticket with releng once approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978861] New: Review Request: xsettingsd - Provides settings to X11 clients via the XSETTINGS specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978861 Bug ID: 1978861 Summary: Review Request: xsettingsd - Provides settings to X11 clients via the XSETTINGS specification Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dcava...@fb.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/xsettingsd/xsettingsd.spec SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/xsettingsd/xsettingsd-1.0.2-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: xsettingsd is a daemon that implements the XSETTINGS specification. It is intended to be small, fast, and minimally dependent on other libraries. It can serve as an alternative to gnome-settings-daemon for users who are not using the GNOME desktop environment but who still run GTK+ applications and want to configure things such as themes, font anti-aliasing/hinting, and UI sound effects. Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978858] Review Request: xrefresh - Refresh all or part of an X screen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978858 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #2 from Davide Cavalca --- Note: this will need to be unretired, I'll file a ticket with releng once approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978858] New: Review Request: xrefresh - Refresh all or part of an X screen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978858 Bug ID: 1978858 Summary: Review Request: xrefresh - Refresh all or part of an X screen Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dcava...@fb.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/xrefresh/xrefresh.spec SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/xrefresh/xrefresh-1.0.6-3.fc35.src.rpm Description: xrefresh is a simple X program that causes all or part of your screen to be repainted. Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978847] Review Request: libobjc2 - GNUstep Objective-C runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978847 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978847] Review Request: libobjc2 - GNUstep Objective-C runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978847
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
> Source: %{url}/archive/v%{version}.tar.gz
Please adjust this to "%{url}/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978847] Review Request: libobjc2 - GNUstep Objective-C runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978847 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #2 from Davide Cavalca --- This is based on https://github.com/trunkmaster/nextspace/blob/448b9e8e1bba4b814ffed33200f6cae3564a516f/Libraries/libobjc2/libobjc2.spec Note that I'm renaming an include to avoid a conflict with libdispatch-devel. A better way to handle this would probably be some kind of alternatives system so that one could pick the include they want. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978847] New: Review Request: libobjc2 - GNUstep Objective-C runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978847 Bug ID: 1978847 Summary: Review Request: libobjc2 - GNUstep Objective-C runtime library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dcava...@fb.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/libobjc2/libobjc2.spec SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/libobjc2/libobjc2-2.1-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: The GNUstep Objective-C runtime is designed as a drop-in replacement for the GCC runtime. It supports both a legacy and a modern ABI, allowing code compiled with old versions of GCC to be supported without requiring recompilation. The modern ABI adds the following features: * Non-fragile instance variables. * Protocol uniquing. * Object planes support. * Declared property introspection. Both ABIs support the following feature above and beyond the GCC runtime: * The modern Objective-C runtime APIs, introduced with OS X 10.5. * Blocks (closures). * Low memory profile for platforms where memory usage is more important than speed. * Synthesised property accessors. * Efficient support for @synchronized() * Type-dependent dispatch, eliminating stack corruption from mismatched selectors. * Support for the associated reference APIs introduced with Mac OS X 10.6. * Support for the automatic reference counting APIs introduced with Mac OS X 10. Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1974114] Review Request: python-environs - Python library for parsing environment variables
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974114 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-07-03 01:24:59 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-c3669c1600 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973993] Review Request: rust-cordic - fixed-point numbers using the CORDIC method.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973993 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-93e583c2bb has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-93e583c2bb \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-93e583c2bb See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973992] Review Request: rust-fixed - Fixed-point numbers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973992 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-93e583c2bb has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-93e583c2bb \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-93e583c2bb See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973987] Review Request: rust-az - Casts and checked casts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973987 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-93e583c2bb has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-93e583c2bb \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-93e583c2bb See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1974793] Review Request: rust-target - Get information on compilation target
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974793 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-c1dffd09dc has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-c1dffd09dc \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c1dffd09dc See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973987] Review Request: rust-az - Casts and checked casts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973987 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-967f15d023 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-967f15d023 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-967f15d023 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976038] Review Request: golang-github-sgreben-flagvar - A collection of CLI argument types for the Go `flag` package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976038 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-4d087e6324 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-4d087e6324` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4d087e6324 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1966385] Review Request: rust-oxipng - Oxipng is a multithreaded lossless PNG compression optimizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1966385 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-fd30df9fff has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-fd30df9fff \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-fd30df9fff See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976414] Review Request: mqttcli - Simple MQTT CLI pub/sub client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976414 Link Dupont changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1976041, 1976038 --- Comment #4 from Link Dupont --- Yea, those two packages are still under review. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976038 [Bug 1976038] Review Request: golang-github-sgreben-flagvar - A collection of CLI argument types for the Go `flag` package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976041 [Bug 1976041] Review Request: golang-github-peterbourgon-ff-3 - Flags-first package for configuration -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976038] Review Request: golang-github-sgreben-flagvar - A collection of CLI argument types for the Go `flag` package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976038 Link Dupont changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1976414 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976414 [Bug 1976414] Review Request: mqttcli - Simple MQTT CLI pub/sub client -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976041] Review Request: golang-github-peterbourgon-ff-3 - Flags-first package for configuration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976041 Link Dupont changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1976414 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976414 [Bug 1976414] Review Request: mqttcli - Simple MQTT CLI pub/sub client -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973987] Review Request: rust-az - Casts and checked casts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973987 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-967f15d023 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-967f15d023 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973918] Review Request: golang-github-facebookgo-stack - Utilities to capture and pass around stack traces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973918 --- Comment #5 from Davide Cavalca --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35462 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973918] Review Request: golang-github-facebookgo-stack - Utilities to capture and pass around stack traces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973918 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||golang-github-facebookgo-st ||ack-0-0.1.git7517733.fc35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973969] Review Request: golang-github-ziutek-telnet - Package to handle a telnet connection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973969 --- Comment #5 from Davide Cavalca --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35461 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973969] Review Request: golang-github-ziutek-telnet - Package to handle a telnet connection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973969 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||golang-github-ziutek-telnet ||-0-0.1.gitc3b780d.fc35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973927] Review Request: golang-github-rekby-gpt - Library for direct work with GPT table
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973927 --- Comment #5 from Davide Cavalca --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35460 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973927] Review Request: golang-github-rekby-gpt - Library for direct work with GPT table
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973927 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||golang-github-rekby-gpt-0-0 ||.1.git7da10ae.fc35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973926] Review Request: golang-github-intel-cpuid - Intel CPUID library for Go Programming Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973926 --- Comment #5 from Davide Cavalca --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35459 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973926] Review Request: golang-github-intel-cpuid - Intel CPUID library for Go Programming Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973926 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||golang-github-intel-cpuid-0 ||-0.1.git5747e5c.fc35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973914] Review Request: golang-github-u-root-uio - Golang package for breaking up circular dependencies in u-root
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973914 --- Comment #5 from Davide Cavalca --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35458 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973914] Review Request: golang-github-u-root-uio - Golang package for breaking up circular dependencies in u-root
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973914 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||golang-github-u-root-uio-0- ||0.1.gite40b768.fc35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973915] Review Request: golang-github-fanliao-promise - A library to implement future and promise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973915 --- Comment #5 from Davide Cavalca --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35457 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973915] Review Request: golang-github-fanliao-promise - A library to implement future and promise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973915 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||golang-github-fanliao-promi ||se-1.0.0.Alpha-1.git1890db3 ||.fc35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973920] Review Request: golang-github-facebookgo-subset - A library to check if a value is a subset of another
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973920 --- Comment #5 from Davide Cavalca --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35456 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973920] Review Request: golang-github-facebookgo-subset - A library to check if a value is a subset of another
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973920 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||golang-github-facebookgo-su ||bset-0-0.1.gitc811ad8.fc35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973762] Review Request: golang-github-xaionaro-atomicmap - High performance thread-safe implementation of hash map for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973762 --- Comment #7 from Davide Cavalca --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35455 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973762] Review Request: golang-github-xaionaro-atomicmap - High performance thread-safe implementation of hash map for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973762 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||golang-github-xaionaro-atom ||icmap-0-0.1.git96a7f1f.fc35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973520] Review Request: golang-github-chappjc-logrus-prefix - Logrus Prefixed Log Formatter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973520 --- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35454 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973520] Review Request: golang-github-chappjc-logrus-prefix - Logrus Prefixed Log Formatter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973520 Davide Cavalca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||golang-github-chappjc-logru ||s-prefix-0-0.1.20210406git3 ||a1d648.fc35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973993] Review Request: rust-cordic - fixed-point numbers using the CORDIC method.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973993 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-93e583c2bb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-93e583c2bb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973992] Review Request: rust-fixed - Fixed-point numbers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973992 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-93e583c2bb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-93e583c2bb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973987] Review Request: rust-az - Casts and checked casts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973987 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-93e583c2bb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-93e583c2bb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1974119] Review Request: golang-github-google-goexpect - Expect for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974119 --- Comment #2 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-google-goexpect 1974119 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35452 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1974115] Review Request: golang-github-google-goterm - Go Terminal library with PTY support and colors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974115 --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-google-goterm 1974115 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35451 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976414] Review Request: mqttcli - Simple MQTT CLI pub/sub client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976414 Sergio Basto changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ser...@serjux.com --- Comment #3 from Sergio Basto --- No matching package to install: 'golang(github.com/peterbourgon/ff/v3)' No matching package to install: 'golang(github.com/sgreben/flagvar)' Not all dependencies satisfied Error: Some packages could not be found. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1974112] Review Request: golang-github-google-tpm - Go library that communicates directly with a TPM device
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974112 --- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-google-tpm 1974112 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35450 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953340] Review Request: dovecot-fts-xapian - Xapian plugin for Dovecot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340
--- Comment #7 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to Joan Moreau from comment #6)
> In practical terms, how to move forward ("get a sponsor" is just a foggy
> stuff -> I am just willing to resolve a request
> (https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/issues/82 ), not planning to "show my
> expertise"
>
We don't just allow anybody into the packager group, you need to be vetted, by
showing you understand the packaging guidelines,
> What is "needinfo" ?
Below the reply text area, there is a check box with "Need additional
information from"
>
> Can you help with moving this forward ?
>
I've sent you a mail regarding sponsorship but I haven't heard back from you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1953340] Review Request: dovecot-fts-xapian - Xapian plugin for Dovecot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340
--- Comment #6 from Joan Moreau ---
In practical terms, how to move forward ("get a sponsor" is just a foggy stuff
-> I am just willing to resolve a request
(https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/issues/82 ), not planning to "show my
expertise"
What is "needinfo" ?
Can you help with moving this forward ?
Or how can I sponsor myself ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978515] Review Request: dropwatch - monitor for dropped network packets in the kernel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978515 --- Comment #10 from Mikel Olasagasti Uranga --- And also remember to split and order BuildRequires and Requires so it's easier to read -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978515] Review Request: dropwatch - monitor for dropped network packets in the kernel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978515
Mikel Olasagasti Uranga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(mikel@olasagasti. |
|info) |
--- Comment #9 from Mikel Olasagasti Uranga ---
Hi Hangbin,
One last thing and this should be complete.
- Use make_install macro
-mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}
-mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1
-install -m0755 src/dropwatch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}
-install -m0644 doc/dropwatch.1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1
-
+%{make_install}
And then in %files you can change from * to binaries
-%{_bindir}/*
+%{_bindir}/dropwatch
+%{_bindir}/dwdump
Same with man pages, but you'll need to patch doc/Makefile.am to include
dwdump's man page with
https://github.com/nhorman/dropwatch/commit/a6a152f111766afefcdf3a3ba271cdeb3f387553
You can use directly:
Patch1: https://github.com/nhorman/dropwatch/pull/33.patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1974793] Review Request: rust-target - Get information on compilation target
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974793 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-c1dffd09dc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c1dffd09dc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1908526] Review Request: python-opentracing - OpenTracing interface for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908526 Fabrice Bauzac-Stehly changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2021-07-02 20:08:43 --- Comment #16 from Fabrice Bauzac-Stehly --- Builds for f33, f34 and f35 successful. Closing this bug as per step 12 of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/New_package_process_for_existing_contributors . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978795] Review Request: tree-sitter - An incremental parsing system for programming tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978795 --- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tree-sitter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978795] Review Request: tree-sitter - An incremental parsing system for programming tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978795
--- Comment #7 from Aleksei Bavshin ---
Hm. I overlooked that, but
> Requires: lib%{name} = %{version}
in libtree-sitter-devel should be stricter: `Requires: lib%{name}%{?_isa}
= %{version}-%{release}`. You can fix that before import.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1046959] Review Request: simple-tpm-pk11 - A simple tool for using the TPM chip to secure SSH keys
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046959 Otto Urpelainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||otu...@iki.fi Flags||needinfo?(m...@zarb.org) --- Comment #18 from Otto Urpelainen --- This review request is really old. Do you still intend to complete it? If so, please indicate. If not, please close this issue and make it block FE-DEADREVIEW, or do nothing, in which case automation will close the request in one month. In can review if needed, but I do not have the device this is used with. Because of that, Nicolas would be a better candidate, if he is still interested and has the device. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1974793] Review Request: rust-target - Get information on compilation target
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974793 --- Comment #4 from Olivier Lemasle --- Thanks for the review Robert-André! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1027541] Review Request: cb2bib - A tool for extracting bibliographic reference s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027541 Otto Urpelainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||otu...@iki.fi Flags||needinfo?(ia...@zathras.org ||) --- Comment #5 from Otto Urpelainen --- This review request is really old. Do you still intend to complete it? If so, I can review. If not, please close this issue and make it block FE-DEADREVIEW, or do nothing, in which case automation will close the request in one month. I cannot help with sponsoring, though. Somebody from the packager sponsors group should do that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978795] Review Request: tree-sitter - An incremental parsing system for programming tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978795
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Aleksei Bavshin ---
Approved.
You can reset the changelog and Release before import.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 332 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/alebastr/fedora-
scm/review/1978795-tree-sitter/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in libtree-
sitter , libtree-sitter-devel
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is
[Bug 1026052] Review Request: rubygem-github-markdown - rubygem to process github markdown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026052 Otto Urpelainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||otu...@iki.fi Flags||needinfo?(af...@affix.me) --- Comment #14 from Otto Urpelainen --- This review request is really old. Do you still intend to complete it? If so, I can review. If not, please close this issue and make it block FE-DEADREVIEW, or do nothing, in which case automation will close the request in one month. Since there is no public upstream repository and the gem itself is now "not maintained and not supported", I think this package should not be added to Fedora. But it is your call if you want to do that, of course. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978795] Review Request: tree-sitter - An incremental parsing system for programming tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978795 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schneider --- Spec URL: https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/tree-sitter/tree-sitter.spec SRPM URL: https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-0.20.0-3.fc34.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978795] Review Request: tree-sitter - An incremental parsing system for programming tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978795 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schneider --- Spec URL: https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/tree-sitter/tree-sitter.spec SRPM URL: https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-0.20.0-2.fc34.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976414] Review Request: mqttcli - Simple MQTT CLI pub/sub client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976414 John W. Linville changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|linvi...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flags|fedora-review? | --- Comment #2 from John W. Linville --- Unfortunately, at the moment I can't get fedora-review to run properly -- some sort of problem with mock? Anyway, give me a week or so. If no one else picks-up this review then Needinfo me and I'll get back to it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978795] Review Request: tree-sitter - An incremental parsing system for programming tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978795 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schneider --- The main package could be a binary if you package the rust stuff, but I don't care about that. However it might be done later, so I've named it libtree-sitter ... Will fix the rest. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1002328] Review request: grub2-circled-nasa-themes - A circled countdown on a NASA iotd wallpaper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002328 Otto Urpelainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||otu...@iki.fi Flags||needinfo?(erat.simon@gmail. ||com) --- Comment #13 from Otto Urpelainen --- This review request is really old. Do you still intend to complete it? If so, please confirm. If not, please close this issue and make it block FE-DEADREVIEW, or do nothing, in which case automation will close the request in one month. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1004544] Package Review: grub2-icons
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004544 Otto Urpelainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||otu...@iki.fi Flags||needinfo?(erat.simon@gmail. ||com) --- Comment #22 from Otto Urpelainen --- This review request is really old. Do you still intend to complete it? If so, please confirm. If not, please close this issue and make it block FE-DEADREVIEW, or do nothing, in which case automation will close the request in one month. Specfile and srpm links are dead, fresh ones are needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1974793] Review Request: rust-target - Get information on compilation target
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974793 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-target -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1012837] Review Request: sxhkd - A simple X hotkey daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012837 Otto Urpelainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||otu...@iki.fi Flags||needinfo?(i...@cicku.me) --- Comment #14 from Otto Urpelainen --- This review request is really old. Do you still intend to complete it? If so, I can review, unless Pavel wants to continue. If not, please close this issue and make it block FE-DEADREVIEW, or do nothing, in which case automation will close the request in one month. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1000799] Review Request: ulatencyd - Daemon to minimize latency on a Linux system using cgroups
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000799 Otto Urpelainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||otu...@iki.fi Flags||needinfo?(pa...@hubbitus.in ||fo) --- Comment #9 from Otto Urpelainen --- This review request is really old. Do you still intend to complete it? If so, I can review. If not, please close this issue and make it block FE-DEADREVIEW, or do nothing, in which case automation will close the request in one month. Upstream README starts with note about being unmaintained. Combined with the build and bundling issues, it seems to me that ulatencyd should not be added to Fedora. But, it is your call if you want to keep it running, of course. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 996530] Review Request: Script-Tools - Automate releases & more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996530 Otto Urpelainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||otu...@iki.fi Flags||needinfo?(erat.simon@gmail. ||com) --- Comment #20 from Otto Urpelainen --- This review request is really old. Do you still intend to complete it? If so, I can review. If not, please close this issue and make it block FE-DEADREVIEW, or do nothing, in which case automation will close the request in one month. According to earlier comments, the specfile has multiple outstanding issues. Also, Fedora packaging guidelines have changed considerably in the meantime, so you should check the specfile against the current guidelines. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978795] Review Request: tree-sitter - An incremental parsing system for programming tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978795
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||alebast...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|alebast...@gmail.com
Flags|fedora-review? |
--- Comment #2 from Aleksei Bavshin ---
> Source0:
> https://github.com/tree-sitter/%{name}/archive/v%{version}.tar.gz#/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
You can simplify that to
https://github.com/tree-sitter/%{name}/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
> BuildRequires: cargo > 1.40
Not needed/used in the build. If you intended to build rust bindings, please
create a new package from https://crates.io/crates/tree-sitter according to the
rust guidelines. However, that's not requires for neovim.
Following two lines are required though:
BuildRequires: gcc
BuildRequires: make
> Summary:Asychronous I/O support library
That doesn't seem right.
Also, you don't have to create lib%{name} subpackages. That's not regulated by
the guidelines, but lib%{name} pattern is mostly used when the library is an
additional output of the source and the main package is a binary.
> export CFLAGS='%{optflags}'
%set_build_flags
This macro will export all required flags and save you from, for example,
forgetting to set LDFLAGS required by Fedora.
> %post -n lib%{name} -p /sbin/ldconfig
> %postun -n lib%{name} -p /sbin/ldconfig
That's no longer necessary since... a while ago. If you want your spec to be
compatible with el7, you can use `%{?ldconfig_scriptlets}` instead. Otherwise,
please, remove this.
> %{_libdir}/libtree-sitter.so.*
Please, use part of soname in glob, i.e. `%{_libdir}/libtree-sitter.so.0*`.
Rationale:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_listing_shared_library_files
`
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 490140] Review Request: zsync - Client-side implementation of the rsync algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140 Otto Urpelainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||otu...@iki.fi Flags||needinfo?(cassmodiah@fedora ||project.org) --- Comment #23 from Otto Urpelainen --- This review request is really old. Do you still intend to complete it? If so, I can review. If not, please close this issue and make it block FE-DEADREVIEW, or do nothing, in which case automation will close the request in one month. Previously, this was blocked because of bundled zlib. Since then, the rules have changed and a FESCo exception is no longer needed, just adding the appropriate virtual provide. Thus, the bundling situation should not block this any more. Links to specfile and srpm are dead, please provide fresh ones. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978795] Review Request: tree-sitter - An incremental parsing system for programming tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978795 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schneider --- This is a new requirement for neovim 0.5.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978795] Review Request: tree-sitter - An incremental parsing system for programming tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978795 Andreas Schneider changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978795] New: Review Request: tree-sitter - An incremental parsing system for programming tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978795 Bug ID: 1978795 Summary: Review Request: tree-sitter - An incremental parsing system for programming tools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: a...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/tree-sitter/tree-sitter.spec SRPM URL: https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-0.20.0-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Tree-sitter is a parser generator tool and an incremental parsing library. It can build a concrete syntax tree for a source file and efficiently update the syntax tree as the source file is edited. Tree-sitter aims to be: * General enough to parse any programming language * Fast enough to parse on every keystroke in a text editor * Robust enough to provide useful results even in the presence of syntax errors * Dependency-free so that the runtime library (which is written in pure C) can be embedded in any application Fedora Account System Username: asn -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1974821] Review Request: debugbreak - Break into the debugger programmatically
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974821
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License", "Unknown or generated". 11
files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/debugbreak/review-
debugbreak/licensecheck.txt
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile
[Bug 1974793] Review Request: rust-target - Get information on compilation target
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974793 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. Thanks for picking it up! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1974749] Review Request: moolticute - Companion app for Mooltipass password manager devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974749
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Bump to 0.50.1
-
> If I understand the guidelines correctly, the package can be licensed under
> the GPLv3
because they are compiled into a single binary, and the GPLv3 is the most
restrictive license.
So, if you are comfortable calculating the effective license it can be helpful
to others to use that in the License: field. If you're not comfortable, or you
wish to be precise in how you populate the License: field, you may list all of
the licenses in the source that were compiled together to make the combined
work in the binary rpm.
GPLv3 is okay. I generally encourage people to list all the licenses but it's
good that way. I'd like you to add the license breakdown as a comment above the
License field,
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License v3.0 or
later", "*No copyright* [generated file]", "GNU General Public
License, Version 3", "GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 3 GNU
General Public License, Version 2", "BSD 2-clause "Simplified"
License", "Expat License SIL Open Font License", "SIL Open Font
License", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License", "Expat License",
"Do What The Fuck You Want To Public License, Version 2". 435 files
have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/moolticute/review-
moolticute/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[Bug 1976038] Review Request: golang-github-sgreben-flagvar - A collection of CLI argument types for the Go `flag` package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976038 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-4d087e6324 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4d087e6324 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1974597] Review Request: vim-ale - Asynchronous Vim Lint Engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974597
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License", "Unknown or generated".
657 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/vim-ale/review-vim-ale/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
/usr/share/vim/vimfiles/rplugin(vim-devicons),
/usr/share/vim/vimfiles/rplugin/python3(vim-devicons, vim-go)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in neovim-
ale
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to
[Bug 1978515] Review Request: dropwatch - monitor for dropped network packets in the kernel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978515 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mattia.ve...@protonmail.com --- Comment #8 from Mattia Verga --- (In reply to Hangbin Liu from comment #6) > BTW, I have a question about the account. > > I already have an account at > https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/user/liuhangbin/. > And I have signed the FPCA in the setting page. But when I try to fork the > dropwatch > code in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dropwatch. It said I need to sign > the PFCA > again with address https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/. But I can't > log in to this > site with my fedora account/passwd. Should I re-create a new account there? > > Thanks > Hangbin We recently switched the account system from admin.fedoraproject.org to accounts.fedoraproject.org so you don't need to create an account on the old system (you can't, the old system is also read only). This is probably a bug in src.fpo.org looking for the FPCA agreement in the old place rather then in the new. Can you open a bug in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues for this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1974431] Review Request: fast_float - Fast & exact implementation of C++ from_chars for float/double
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974431
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required.
Note: Sources not installed
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0",
"*No copyright* Expat License", "Apache License 2.0". 48 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/fast_float/review-
fast_float/licensecheck.txt
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify
[Bug 1974119] Review Request: golang-github-google-goexpect - Expect for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974119 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1974115] Review Request: golang-github-google-goterm - Go Terminal library with PTY support and colors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974115 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1974118] Review Request: python-typer-cli - Run Typer scripts with completion, without creating a package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974118 --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Also your help on Package Reviews is highly appreciated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973993] Review Request: rust-cordic - fixed-point numbers using the CORDIC method.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973993 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-cordic -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973992] Review Request: rust-fixed - Fixed-point numbers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973992 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1974118] Review Request: python-typer-cli - Run Typer scripts with completion, without creating a package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974118
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Bump to 0.0.12
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License", "*No copyright* Expat
License". 40 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-typer-cli/review-
python-typer-cli/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream
[Bug 1973987] Review Request: rust-az - Casts and checked casts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973987 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-az -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1974358] Review Request: fdr - Flight Data Recorder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974358 --- Comment #10 from Mikel Olasagasti Uranga --- *** Bug 1974355 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1974355] Review Request: fdr - Flight Data Recorder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974355 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||mi...@olasagasti.info Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2021-07-02 15:33:07 --- Comment #1 from Mikel Olasagasti Uranga --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1974358 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1974112] Review Request: golang-github-google-tpm - Go library that communicates directly with a TPM device
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974112 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973993] Review Request: rust-cordic - fixed-point numbers using the CORDIC method.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973993 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973992] Review Request: rust-fixed - Fixed-point numbers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973992 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1973987] Review Request: rust-az - Casts and checked casts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973987 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978706] New: Review Request: glusterfs-selinux - This is package for selinux policies for gluster
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978706 Bug ID: 1978706 Summary: Review Request: glusterfs-selinux - This is package for selinux policies for gluster Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sacha...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NZWqZykLvmIDdXoDmKetDjTHGgChOgJe/view?usp=sharing SRPM URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GajmD4K_7bE0KG0pyfLnZsO4ADO4_3ry/view?usp=sharing Description: This is package for glusterfs selinux https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs-selinux I am packaging glusterfs-selinux for the first time. Scratch builds: f33: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=71187324 f34: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=71187863 f35: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=71188146 I am requesting for a sponsorship. Fedora Account System Username: shwetha -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978515] Review Request: dropwatch - monitor for dropped network packets in the kernel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978515 Hangbin Liu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(mikel@olasagasti. ||info) --- Comment #7 from Hangbin Liu --- Hi Mikel, Here are the updated spec file and SRPM: SPEC URL: https://people.redhat.com/haliu/dropwatch/dropwatch.spec SRPM URL: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9845/71189845/dropwatch-1.5.3-5.fc34.src.rpm Thanks Hangbin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978682] New: Review Request : rust-rust-json_value_merge - Give an interface to merge two json_serde::Value together.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978682 Bug ID: 1978682 Summary: Review Request : rust-rust-json_value_merge - Give an interface to merge two json_serde::Value together. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jbtryst...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora spec file : https://gitlab.com/jbtrystram/rust-json_merge_values/-/raw/main/rust-json_value_merge.spec SRPM file : https://gitlab.com/jbtrystram/rust-json_merge_values/-/raw/main/rust-json_value_merge-0.1.2-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Small library that givea an interface to merge two json_serde::Value together. Fedora Account System Username: jbtrystram Koji build : https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=71191121 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976481] Review Request: gi-docgen - Documentation tool for GObject-based libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976481 --- Comment #4 from Tomas Hrcka --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gi-docgen -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1971512] Review Request: jigawatts - Java CRIU helper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971512 --- Comment #31 from Tomas Hrcka --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jigawatts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976481] Review Request: gi-docgen - Documentation tool for GObject-based libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976481 --- Comment #3 from Artem --- > high-quality gi-docgen package It's great and there is lot work. I didn't even tried to package it TBH and thought it will be trivial but time consuming. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976481] Review Request: gi-docgen - Documentation tool for GObject-based libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976481 --- Comment #2 from Ben Beasley --- Thanks for the review. Repository requested. I think I’ve made a high-quality gi-docgen package, but I haven’t tried actually generating documentation with it, so I appreciate and look forward to any feedback. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
