[Bug 1847058] Review Request: mod_authn_otp - One-time password authentication for apache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847058 Oden Eriksson changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(o...@nux.se)| --- Comment #16 from Oden Eriksson --- (In reply to Mattia Verga from comment #15) > Package never imported, resetting ticket status (it will need a fresh review > to create the repository). > > Oden, what's the status? Are you still interested in packaging this in > Fedora? Hi, I'm sorry to say I lost interest in this particular software. It's free for anyone to adopt. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1985398] Review Request: pack - Convert code into runnable images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985398 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-ae17f8b9e7 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1971315] Review Request: chessx - Chess Database and PGN viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971315 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-b7f3c1ad0c has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1981110] Review Request: rust-cpufeatures - No-std compatible alternative to the is_x86_feature_detected! macro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981110 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-9f4d0e6041 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1988832] Review Request: python-pytest-bdd - BDD library for the py.test runner
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988832 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-949de57a23 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-949de57a23 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-949de57a23 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1982011] Review Request: netperf - Benchmark to measure the performance of many different types of networking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-088c69a486 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-088c69a486 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-088c69a486 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1985398] Review Request: pack - Convert code into runnable images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985398 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-08-04 03:43:04 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-1b3a943753 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1982772] Review Request: ndppd - NDP Proxy Daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982772 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-4b43b575e2 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-4b43b575e2 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4b43b575e2 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1979403] Review Request: wdsp - DSP library for LinHPSDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979403 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-79ee1eba84 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-79ee1eba84 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-79ee1eba84 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976414] Review Request: mqttcli - Simple MQTT CLI pub/sub client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976414 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2021-08-04 03:43:02 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-cbe9daa4c9 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976993] Review Request: rust-gtk3-macros - Rust bindings for the GTK 3 library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976993 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-08-04 03:42:54 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-663706621d has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1978509] Review Request: rust-radix64 - A base64 library by another name
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978509 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-08-04 03:42:51 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-5168bf3f5a has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1971315] Review Request: chessx - Chess Database and PGN viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971315 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2021-08-04 03:42:34 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-4ae6f3b0a9 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1979403] Review Request: wdsp - DSP library for LinHPSDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979403 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-8e0d8e4e2f has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-8e0d8e4e2f \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8e0d8e4e2f See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1988832] Review Request: python-pytest-bdd - BDD library for the py.test runner
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988832 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-1ceffed98b has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-1ceffed98b \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-1ceffed98b See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1987045] Review Request: dump1090 - Simple Mode S decoder specifically designed for RTLSDR devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987045
--- Comment #9 from Troy Curtis ---
Yeah when I plugged mine in I wondered to myself if I had setup the RTLSDR on
this laptop or not, and happily I had!
Overall looks good now, especially will those handly forge macros, just a few
nits in the text but otherwise looks good to go to me!
= Issues
- A small rpmlint warning that should probably be addressed:
- dump1090.src:7: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 2, tab: line
7)
- It probably makes the most sense to put the %forgemeta line before the Name:
line, since it defines values used later, and isn't really "part" of the
header.
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Unknown or generated", "BSD (2 clause)". 6
files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/troycurtisjr/working/oss/fedora/reviews/dump1090/2/review-
dump1090/licensecheck.txt
[-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
Note: Technically the license text is from upstream, but extracted from a
header.
[x]: Patches link to up
[Bug 1752233] Review Request: mle - small, flexible, terminal-based text editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752233 --- Comment #8 from a...@php.net --- Hello. Since filing these tickets, the original author of termbox stepped down and I started maintaining it. I also identified a few issues[1] in termbox that I'd like to address before continuing packaging[2]. It will likely entail ABI changes. If someone wants to pick up where I left off and package the current versions (termbox v1.1.4, mle v1.4.3) that would be fine by me. [1] https://github.com/termbox/termbox/issues [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752158 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1989787] New: Review Request: pop-icon-theme - Pop Icons
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989787 Bug ID: 1989787 Summary: Review Request: pop-icon-theme - Pop Icons Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: c...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/carlwgeorge/cosmic/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02362289-pop-icon-theme/pop-icon-theme.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/carlwgeorge/cosmic/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02362289-pop-icon-theme/pop-icon-theme-2.1.0%5E1.8e5d8ca-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: Pop_Icons is the icon theme for Pop!_OS. It uses a semi-flat design with raised 3D motifs to help give depth to icons. Pop_Icons take inspiration from the Adwaita GNOME Icons. Fedora Account System Username: carlwgeorge Note: When running fedora-review on this package, there will be an issue about the package name already existing. This package was previously in the distribution. Once the package review is approved I will unretire the package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1989786] New: Review Request: pop-gtk-theme - Pop GTK Theme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989786 Bug ID: 1989786 Summary: Review Request: pop-gtk-theme - Pop GTK Theme Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: c...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/carlwgeorge/cosmic/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02362281-pop-gtk-theme/pop-gtk-theme.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/carlwgeorge/cosmic/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02362281-pop-gtk-theme/pop-gtk-theme-5.3.3%5E1.11bcd41-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: The Pop theme for GTK. Fedora Account System Username: carlwgeorge Note: When running fedora-review on this package, there will be an issue about the package name already existing. This package was previously in the distribution. Once the package review is approved I will unretire the package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1977061] Review Request: rust-graphene-sys - FFI bindings to libgraphene-1.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977061 Bug 1977061 depends on bug 1974969, which changed state. Bug 1974969 Summary: rust-glib-sys-0.14.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974969 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1977061] Review Request: rust-graphene-sys - FFI bindings to libgraphene-1.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977061 Bug 1977061 depends on bug 1935094, which changed state. Bug 1935094 Summary: rust-system-deps-3.2.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935094 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1970050] Review Request: cri-o - Kubernetes Container Runtime Interface for OCI-based containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970050
--- Comment #12 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #11)
>
> > Version: 1.21.0
>
> You have a %built_tag_strip variable that you should probably have using
> this value
What I mean here is that Version should be "Version: %{built_tag_strip}"
instead.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1970050] Review Request: cri-o - Kubernetes Container Runtime Interface for OCI-based containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970050
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ngomp...@gmail.co |
|m) |
--- Comment #11 from Neal Gompa ---
Looking over the spec...
> %if ! 0%{?gobuild:1} || 0%{?centos}
Use %rhel instead of %centos
> %define download_url %{git0}/archive/%{built_tag}.tar.gz
Use "%{git0}/archive/%{built_tag}/%{name}-%{built_tag_strip}.tar.gz"
> Version: 1.21.0
You have a %built_tag_strip variable that you should probably have using this
value
> %if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?centos} >= 8
Use %rhel instead of %centos
> %if 0%{?centos} <= 7 || 0%{?rhel} <= 7
Use "%if 0%{?rhel} && 0%{?rhel} < 8" instead.
> %if ! 0%{?fedora} && (0%{?centos} <= 7 || 0%{?rhel} <= 7)
Use "%if 0%{?rhel} && 0%{?rhel} < 8" instead.
> %postun
> rm -f %{_unitdir}/%{repo}.service
This is not acceptable in a scriptlet. Please drop that.
> #define license tag if not already defined
> %{!?_licensedir:%global license %doc}
This is not needed for any supported Fedora or RHEL release. Please drop it.
> %{_usr}/lib/sysctl.d/99-cri-o.conf
Use "%{_sysctldir}/99-cri-o.conf" instead.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1982011] Review Request: netperf - Benchmark to measure the performance of many different types of networking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-941089b392 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-941089b392 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1982772] Review Request: ndppd - NDP Proxy Daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982772 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-caf4df5837 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-caf4df5837 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1982011] Review Request: netperf - Benchmark to measure the performance of many different types of networking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-088c69a486 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-088c69a486 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1982772] Review Request: ndppd - NDP Proxy Daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982772 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-4b43b575e2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4b43b575e2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1986417] Review Request: python-azure-sdk-tools - Specific tools for Azure SDK for Python testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986417 Major Hayden 🤠 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2021-08-03 21:56:53 --- Comment #6 from Major Hayden 🤠 --- Built in rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=73228599 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1986602] Review Request: azure-cli - Microsoft Azure Command-Line Tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986602 Bug 1986602 depends on bug 1986417, which changed state. Bug 1986417 Summary: Review Request: python-azure-sdk-tools - Specific tools for Azure SDK for Python testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986417 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1986417] Review Request: python-azure-sdk-tools - Specific tools for Azure SDK for Python testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986417 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-azure-sdk-tools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1986417] Review Request: python-azure-sdk-tools - Specific tools for Azure SDK for Python testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986417 --- Comment #4 from Major Hayden 🤠 --- Ugh, I'll get that fixed. Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1986417] Review Request: python-azure-sdk-tools - Specific tools for Azure SDK for Python testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986417 Sandro Mani changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(manisandro@gmail. | |com)| --- Comment #3 from Sandro Mani --- Still read License:MIT but I trust you to fix it before importing ;) Approved! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1986417] Review Request: python-azure-sdk-tools - Specific tools for Azure SDK for Python testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986417 Major Hayden 🤠 changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(manisandro@gmail. ||com) --- Comment #2 from Major Hayden 🤠 --- (In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #1) > MUST issues: > > [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. => > There are some ASL 2.0 licensed files Fixed. > SHOULD issues: > > [!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise > justified. I added a comment explaining about the testing requirements only being required for Azure's CI. Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mhayden/python-azure-sdk-tools.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mhayden/python-azure-sdk-tools-0.0.0~git.1.9d4f5a6-1.fc35.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1989306] Review Request: mingw-libsigc++30 - MinGW Windows sigc++ 3.0 library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989306 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-libsigc++30 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1988686] Review Request: mingw-qt6-qtdeclarative - Qt6 for Windows - QtDeclarative component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988686 Sandro Mani changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(manisandro@gmail. | |com)| Status|POST|ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Sandro Mani --- Right a wrong libdir ended up in a cmake file shipped by the mingw-qt6-qtbase package, was unluckily lucky before that I didn't pick it up as I only built on x86_64 hosts. I'll ping when the fixed build has landed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1986417] Review Request: python-azure-sdk-tools - Specific tools for Azure SDK for Python testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986417
--- Comment #1 from Sandro Mani ---
MUST issues:
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. =>
There are some ASL 2.0 licensed files
SHOULD issues:
[!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "MIT License", "*No copyright* GNU
Lesser General Public License", "*No copyright* [generated file]",
"*No copyright* MIT License", "Apache License 2.0". 10188 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/sandro/Downloads/review/1986417-python-azure-sdk-
tools/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[?]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
[Bug 1986602] Review Request: azure-cli - Microsoft Azure Command-Line Tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986602 Major Hayden 🤠 changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(manisandro@gmail. ||com) --- Comment #3 from Major Hayden 🤠 --- Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mhayden/azure-cli.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mhayden/azure-cli-2.26.1-1.src.rpm Okay, Sandro -- we should be good to go now. I ran a build through koji and it looks like the dependencies are in there now: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=73224140 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1981048] Review Request: linhpsdr - An HPSDR application for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981048 Bug 1981048 depends on bug 1979403, which changed state. Bug 1979403 Summary: Review Request: wdsp - DSP library for LinHPSDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979403 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1979403] Review Request: wdsp - DSP library for LinHPSDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979403 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-8e0d8e4e2f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8e0d8e4e2f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1979403] Review Request: wdsp - DSP library for LinHPSDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979403 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-79ee1eba84 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-79ee1eba84 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1979403] Review Request: wdsp - DSP library for LinHPSDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979403 Jaroslav Škarvada changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2021-08-03 20:30:13 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1981103] Review Request: pihpsdr - Raspberry Pi standalone code for HPSDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981103 Bug 1981103 depends on bug 1979403, which changed state. Bug 1979403 Summary: Review Request: wdsp - DSP library for LinHPSDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979403 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1989306] Review Request: mingw-libsigc++30 - MinGW Windows sigc++ 3.0 library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989306
Major Hayden 🤠 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Major Hayden 🤠 ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
None found. Lots of devel files in the main packages, but that seems standard
for these mingw packages. Some tests would be nice at some point, but we make
the most with what we have. 😉
Approved. 🎉
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1
or later [obsolete FSF postal address (Temple Place)]", "GNU Lesser
General Public License, Version 3", "GNU Lesser General Public License
v2.1 or later", "FSF All Permissive License", "*No copyright* GNU
Lesser General Public License", "GNU Lesser General Public License
v2.1 or later [obsolete FSF postal address (Mass Ave)]", "GNU General
Public License v3.0 or later", "GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0
or later", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later", "Expat
License". 434 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/mingw-
libsigc++30/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{ve
[Bug 1988686] Review Request: mingw-qt6-qtdeclarative - Qt6 for Windows - QtDeclarative component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988686 Major Hayden 🤠 changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(manisandro@gmail. ||com) --- Comment #5 from Major Hayden 🤠 --- Looks like the build failed on all arches: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mhayden/review-mingw-qt6-qtdeclarative/build/2362164/ -- Detecting C compile features - done CMake Error at /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/cmake/Qt6/qt.toolchain.cmake:82 (message): To use a cross-compiled Qt, please specify a path to a host Qt installation CMake directory by setting the QT_HOST_PATH_CMAKE_DIR cache variable. Call Stack (most recent call first): /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/cmake/Qt6/Qt6Config.cmake:27 (include) CMakeLists.txt:21 (find_package) -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! See also "/builddir/build/BUILD/qtdeclarative-everywhere-src-6.1.1/build_win32/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log". error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.T8mMIf (%build) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1988686] Review Request: mingw-qt6-qtdeclarative - Qt6 for Windows - QtDeclarative component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988686 Major Hayden 🤠 changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Major Hayden 🤠 --- Oops, got my tickets crossed. Hold on here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1988686] Review Request: mingw-qt6-qtdeclarative - Qt6 for Windows - QtDeclarative component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988686
Major Hayden 🤠 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Major Hayden 🤠 ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
None found. Lots of devel files in the main packages, but that seems standard
for these mingw packages. Some tests would be nice at some point, but we make
the most with what we have. 😉
Approved. 🎉
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1
or later [obsolete FSF postal address (Temple Place)]", "GNU Lesser
General Public License, Version 3", "GNU Lesser General Public License
v2.1 or later", "FSF All Permissive License", "*No copyright* GNU
Lesser General Public License", "GNU Lesser General Public License
v2.1 or later [obsolete FSF postal address (Mass Ave)]", "GNU General
Public License v3.0 or later", "GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0
or later", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later", "Expat
License". 434 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/mingw-
libsigc++30/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{ve
[Bug 1979403] Review Request: wdsp - DSP library for LinHPSDR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979403 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wdsp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1989306] Review Request: mingw-libsigc++30 - MinGW Windows sigc++ 3.0 library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989306 Major Hayden 🤠 changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mhay...@redhat.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mhay...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1986417] Review Request: python-azure-sdk-tools - Specific tools for Azure SDK for Python testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986417 Sandro Mani changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|manisan...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? CC||manisan...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1987045] Review Request: dump1090 - Simple Mode S decoder specifically designed for RTLSDR devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987045 --- Comment #8 from Stuart D Gathman --- Ah. When I first plugin the rtlsdr, it has group root. When I restart systemd-udev, still owned by group root. But now when I plugin again, it is owned by group rtlsdr. I had indeed restarted systemd-udev on rpi3, thinking it was because I had just installed rtl-sdr that the usb perms weren't getting set. And I had to replug the rtlsdr on rpi3 also (thinking it was because the udev rules had just been installed). So nice to know it works the same on both arches. :-) It could be a bug in udev or in rtl-sdr - but I am not deep enough into udev to be sure. I will let it go, and maybe make a bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1245351] Review Request: ps2emu-tools - PS/2 recording/playback tools for userio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245351 Lyude changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DEFERRED Last Closed||2021-08-03 18:31:40 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1970050] Review Request: cri-o - Kubernetes Container Runtime Interface for OCI-based containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970050 Peter Hunt changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com ||) ||needinfo?(ngomp...@gmail.co ||m) --- Comment #10 from Peter Hunt --- hey folks, checking in on the status of this. Can someone review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1988832] Review Request: python-pytest-bdd - BDD library for the py.test runner
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988832 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-1ceffed98b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-1ceffed98b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1988832] Review Request: python-pytest-bdd - BDD library for the py.test runner
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988832 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-949de57a23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-949de57a23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1987045] Review Request: dump1090 - Simple Mode S decoder specifically designed for RTLSDR devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987045 --- Comment #7 from Ben Beasley --- (In reply to Stuart D Gathman from comment #6) > Just built and installed on rpi3. It complains: > > Found 1 device(s): > 0: , , SN: (currently selected) > usb_open error -3 > Please fix the device permissions, e.g. by installing the udev rules file > rtl-sdr.rules > Error opening the RTLSDR device: Permission denied > > rtl_test finds no errors. Had to add login to rtlsdr group. I didn't have > to do that on an Intel f33 system. > > After adding login to rtlsdr group, it works on rpi3. This is interesting. The rtl-sdr package is responsible for the mentioned udev rules file: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rtl-sdr/blob/rawhide/f/rtl-sdr.spec. I would say this sounds like a bug in that package, but perhaps on x86 rather than on arm/rpi3; the spec file comment implies you *should* have to be a member of the “rtlsdr” group to control the device. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1987045] Review Request: dump1090 - Simple Mode S decoder specifically designed for RTLSDR devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987045 --- Comment #6 from Stuart D Gathman --- Just built and installed on rpi3. It complains: Found 1 device(s): 0: , , SN: (currently selected) usb_open error -3 Please fix the device permissions, e.g. by installing the udev rules file rtl-sdr.rules Error opening the RTLSDR device: Permission denied rtl_test finds no errors. Had to add login to rtlsdr group. I didn't have to do that on an Intel f33 system. After adding login to rtlsdr group, it works on rpi3. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1988832] Review Request: python-pytest-bdd - BDD library for the py.test runner
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988832 --- Comment #3 from Ben Beasley --- Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1921853] Review Request: rust-derive-new - Derive simple constructor functions for structs and enums
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1921853 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||igor.ra...@gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Mattia Verga --- *** Bug 1873737 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1873737] Review Request: rust-derive-new - `#[derive(new)]` implements simple constructor functions for structs and enums
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873737 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |DUPLICATE Flags|fedora-review+ | Assignee|ngomp...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #3 from Mattia Verga --- Oh wait, the one in the repos was from another review request. Closing this as duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1921853 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1873737] Review Request: rust-derive-new - `#[derive(new)]` implements simple constructor functions for structs and enums
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873737 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Status|POST|CLOSED Last Closed||2021-08-03 16:21:24 --- Comment #2 from Mattia Verga --- Package is available in repos -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1869907] Review Request: spirv-llvm-translator - LLVM/SPIRV translator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869907 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2021-08-03 16:20:26 --- Comment #10 from Mattia Verga --- Package is available in repos. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1818999] Review Request: ofono - open source telephony
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818999 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Status|POST|CLOSED Last Closed||2021-08-03 16:19:31 --- Comment #9 from Mattia Verga --- Package is available in repos. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1866798] Review Request: golang-github-xanzy-gitlab - A GitLab API client enabling Go programs to interact with GitLab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1866798 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|m...@fabian-affolter.ch |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flags|fedora-review+ |needinfo?(jsmith.fedora@gma ||il.com) --- Comment #2 from Mattia Verga --- Package never imported, resetting ticket status. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1477834] Review Request: treefrog-framework - High-speed C++ MVC Framework for Web Application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477834 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mattia.ve...@protonmail.com Flags||needinfo?(sensor.wen@gmail. ||com) --- Comment #11 from Mattia Verga --- Package never imported, are you still interested in getting it into Fedora repos? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1982011] Review Request: netperf - Benchmark to measure the performance of many different types of networking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011 --- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/netperf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1982772] Review Request: ndppd - NDP Proxy Daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982772 --- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ndppd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1860941] Review Request: golang-github-danieljoos-wincred - Go wrapper around the Windows Credential Manager API functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860941 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ |needinfo?(kchamart@redhat.c ||om) Status|POST|NEW Assignee|yanqiy...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #3 from Mattia Verga --- Package never imported, resetting ticket status. Kashyap, are you still on this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 902024] Review Request: gdk-pixbuf-psd - GdkPixbuf loader for the PSD file format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|kwiz...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flags|fedora-review+ |needinfo?(mtasaka@fedorapro ||ject.org) --- Comment #25 from Mattia Verga --- Package never imported, resetting ticket status. Mamoru, are you still on this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1858360] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Headers-ActionPack - HTTP Action, Adventure and Excitement
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858360 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|ppi...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flags|fedora-review+ |needinfo?(rc040203@freenet. ||de) --- Comment #2 from Mattia Verga --- Package never imported, resetting ticket status. Ralf, are you still on this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1858413] Review Request: mm - File system based matrix client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858413 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ |needinfo?(mail@fabian-affol ||ter.ch) Status|POST|NEW Assignee|zebo...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Mattia Verga --- Package never imported, resetting ticket status. Moreover, we already have a 'mm' package in Fedora, so we have a name collision here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1982011] Review Request: netperf - Benchmark to measure the performance of many different types of networking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011 --- Comment #8 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! I think %autochangelog is fine per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/rpmautospec and it seems to work properly in F34 for other packages I have. I'll have a look at those systemd macros and see if I can use DynamicUser=yes in the service. $ fedpkg request-repo netperf 1982011 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/36036 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1851405] Review Request: libbee2 - cryptographic library which implements cryptographic algorithm and protocols standardized in Belarus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851405 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ |needinfo?(fuki...@tiksi.ru) Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|zebo...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #22 from Mattia Verga --- Package never imported, resetting ticket status. If you're still interested and still need to find a sponsor, consider open a ticket in https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issues -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1982772] Review Request: ndppd - NDP Proxy Daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982772 --- Comment #6 from Davide Cavalca --- Thanks! $ fedpkg request-repo ndppd 1982772 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/36035 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1245852] Review Request: mingw-lua51 - MinGW Windows Library providing Lua 5.1 programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245852 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ |needinfo?(redhat-bugzilla@l ||inuxnetz.de) Status|POST|NEW Assignee|zebo...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #6 from Mattia Verga --- Package never imported, resetting ticket status (it will need a fresh review to create the repository). Robert, are you still interested in this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1752233] Review Request: mle - small, flexible, terminal-based text editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752233 --- Comment #7 from Mattia Verga --- What's the status on this ticket? I see it depends on termbox, which was also approved and yet not imported as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1847058] Review Request: mod_authn_otp - One-time password authentication for apache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847058 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ngomp...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Flags|fedora-review+ |needinfo?(o...@nux.se) --- Comment #15 from Mattia Verga --- Package never imported, resetting ticket status (it will need a fresh review to create the repository). Oden, what's the status? Are you still interested in packaging this in Fedora? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1662549] Review Request: libqtshadowsocks - A lightweight and ultra-fast shadowsocks library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662549 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Flags|fedora-review+ | |needinfo?(sensor.wen@gmail. | |com)| Status|POST|CLOSED Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Assignee|zebo...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Last Closed||2021-08-03 15:47:23 --- Comment #4 from Mattia Verga --- Package repository retired. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1957744] New RHEL9 package: debugedit - Tools for debuginfo creation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1957744 Matt Newsome changed: What|Removed |Added Pool ID|sst_program_rhel_9 |sst_platform_tools_rhel_9 CC||mnews...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1986602] Review Request: azure-cli - Microsoft Azure Command-Line Tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986602 Bug 1986602 depends on bug 1986414, which changed state. Bug 1986414 Summary: Review Request: python-azure-devtools - Microsoft Azure Development Tools for SDK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986414 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1986414] Review Request: python-azure-devtools - Microsoft Azure Development Tools for SDK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986414 Major Hayden 🤠 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2021-08-03 14:34:24 --- Comment #9 from Major Hayden 🤠 --- Just built for rawhide. Hopefully it shows up in tomorrow's compose. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1989360] Review Request: fedora-flathub-remote - Third party remote pointing to a filtered version of flathub.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989360 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1989357 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989357 [Bug 1989357] Review Request: fedora-third-party - Tool for handling third-party RPM and Flatpak repositories in Fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1989357] Review Request: fedora-third-party - Tool for handling third-party RPM and Flatpak repositories in Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989357 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1989360 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989360 [Bug 1989360] Review Request: fedora-flathub-remote - Third party remote pointing to a filtered version of flathub.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1989360] Review Request: fedora-flathub-remote - Third party remote pointing to a filtered version of flathub.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989360 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa --- Taking this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1989357] Review Request: fedora-third-party - Tool for handling third-party RPM and Flatpak repositories in Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989357 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa --- Taking this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1982011] Review Request: netperf - Benchmark to measure the performance of many different types of networking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011
--- Comment #7 from Petr Menšík ---
I just found in [1] that %{?systemd_ordering} might be useful without explicit
dependency. It would allow installation without systemd, but with correct order
if installed.
1.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/#_dependencies_on_the_systemd_package
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1989592] New: Review Request: fmidi - A library to read and play back MIDI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989592 Bug ID: 1989592 Summary: Review Request: fmidi - A library to read and play back MIDI files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: c...@musicinmybrain.net QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/fmidi.spec SRPM URL: https://music.fedorapeople.org/fmidi-0.1.1-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Fmidi is a library to read and play back MIDI files. It supports both standard MIDI files and RIFF MIDI files. The functionality is exposed as a C programming interface, and it is implemented with C++. It is a simple library which is good for implementing a MIDI file player, or any program taking MIDI files as inputs. In fact, a player with a terminal interface is provided as an example. Fedora Account System Username: music Koji scratch builds: F35: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=73207484 F34: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=73207485 F33: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=73207486 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1982619] Review Request: php-fgrosse-phpasn1 - A PHP Framework that allows you to encode and decode arbitrary ASN.1 structures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982619
Christopher Engelhard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(c...@lcts.de) |needinfo?(otu...@iki.fi)
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Engelhard ---
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/lcts/nextcloud/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02358089-php-fgrosse-phpasn1/php-fgrosse-phpasn1.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/lcts/nextcloud/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02358089-php-fgrosse-phpasn1/php-fgrosse-phpasn1-2.3.0-1.fc35.src.rpm
Sorry for the delay, $DAYJOB intervened.
(In reply to Otto Urpelainen from comment #1)
> 1.
> > Summary:Thin assertion library for input validation in business
> > models
>
> In composer.json it is:
> "A PHP Framework that allows you to encode and decode arbitrary ASN.1
> structures using the ITU-T X.690 Encoding Rules."
> "
Fixed.
> 2.
> > Autoloader: %{_datadir}/php/%{ns_dir}/autoload.php
>
> You may want to use the less specfile tag looking formatting here.
Changed it to the same format as in php-league-uri-interfaces
> 3.
> > : Create a PSR-0 tree
> > mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/php/%{ns_dir}
> > cp -pr lib/* %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/php/%{ns_dir}
>
> In another review it was suggested
> that %{ns_dir} should have two components: vendor and project [1].
> Should the same logic apply here?
> That would create a path fgrosse/FG, with FG being the project name.
> That sounds strange, but perhaps that is just because
> upstream chose a strange namespace name for this project?
>
> [1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982616#c2
As Remi pointed out, this library is a bit of a mess. It's also the only
library the vendor has, so I think it's unlikely there will be any conflict
anytime soon. I left it at php/FG/.. for now, but I'll see if upstream is
interested in bringing a bit more order into this.
> 4.
> > %if 0%{?with_tests}
> > : Run tests
> > : No tests implemented
> > %endif
>
> Upstream has them. I suppose makesrc.sh needs to be introduced.
Did that. I added a small patch to make the tests work with PHPUnit 8 since 7
is EOL. They can also be made compatible with PHPUnit 9, but that patch is
quite extensive. If you're OK with that I'd prefer to take that upstream since
PHPUnit 8 is still fully supported.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1988832] Review Request: python-pytest-bdd - BDD library for the py.test runner
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988832 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pytest-bdd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1982011] Review Request: netperf - Benchmark to measure the performance of many different types of networking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011
--- Comment #6 from Petr Menšík ---
Wait.
Your package uses %systemd_post etc., but does not use %{?systemd_requires} to
require systemd during upgrades. It seems that case is well covered and it
makes sense to work even without systemd. Not necessary it seems, but would
solve unowned %_unitdir.
Another recommendation would be using unprivileged user for netperf service. It
uses root user, which is dangerous. I haven't found whether it is mandatory, I
think it should be therefore just recommended. Consult user and groups [1] in
Guidelines. I think at minimum DynamicUser=yes feature of systemd should be
used to run non-privileged service. I just guess it does not require special
privileges, capabilities(7) would provide ability to grant just few required
permissions in the other case.
1. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/UsersAndGroups/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1987564] Review Request: -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987564
Artur Frenszek-Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
--- Comment #3 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki ---
> Spec URL:
> https://github.com/OEntegrasyon/MongoDB_incremental_backup/releases/tag/mongoInc-backup
> SRPM URL:
> https://github.com/OEntegrasyon/MongoDB_incremental_backup/releases/tag/mongoInc-backup
This is a link to a GitHub downloads page. Please use direct links to the "raw"
.spec and .src.rpm files.
> License: GNU
GNU is a free software project, not the name of a license. Looking at the
sources, you meant the GNU General Public License, version 3. Use "GPLv3" here.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#SoftwareLicenses
> Group:System
> Packager: Ergün Elvan Bilsel
Not used in Fedora.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_tags_and_sections
> mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/mongobackup/
> mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/local/bin/
> mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/licenses/mongoInc-backup/
> mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/doc/mongoInc-backup/
Do not use hard-coded paths. You should use the appropriate RPM macros instead,
e.g. '/usr/share' -> '%{_datadir}'.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/RPMMacros/#_macros_for_paths_set_and_used_by_build_systems
> cp
> /home/ergunbilsel/PycharmProjects/mongoinc/mongoInc-backup-0.1/mongodb-backup.config
> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/mongobackup/
> ...
> cp /home/ergunbilsel/PycharmProjects/mongoinc/mongoInc-backup-0.1/THANKS
> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/doc/mongoInc-backup/
1. Uh... this will fail when run anywhere else apart from your machine.
2. This is done in %prep, whereas it should be done in %install.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1957744] New RHEL9 package: debugedit - Tools for debuginfo creation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1957744 Martin Cermak changed: What|Removed |Added QA Contact|mcer...@redhat.com |mcou...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1982011] Review Request: netperf - Benchmark to measure the performance of many different types of networking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--- Comment #5 from Petr Menšík ---
Okay, seems good to go.
Not sure %autochangelog feature is available already. There seems to be
opposition to it and it is not ready for Fedora 35 [1]. I know I already
accepted some your reviews using %autochangelog, but it seems it should be
removed for now [1]. Original change introducing it were never finished in f34.
My local builds were successful on your spec file, but you may require to
return to classic Release: with %{?dist} tag. I think you will be able to
adjust spec for production build.
1. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/109
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1949633] Review Request: python-pick - pick an option in the terminal with a simple GUI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949633 Petr Viktorin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pvikt...@redhat.com Flags||needinfo?(ge...@bechards.or ||g) --- Comment #4 from Petr Viktorin --- Are you still interested in getting this package into Fedora? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1981493] Review Request: librnd - library for 2D CAD applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981493 Alain V. changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1981493] Review Request: librnd - library for 2D CAD applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981493 Alain V. changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/avigne/librnd/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02315051-librnd/librnd.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/avigne/librnd/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02315051-librnd/librnd-3.0.0-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: Modular framework library for 2D CAD applications. Fedora Account System Username: avigne This library is extracted from pcb-rnd, a PCB editor tool. See http://www.repo.hu/projects/ringdove/ web site to get a broader context (EDA suite) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1985036] Review Request: libart - Adaptive Radix Trees implemented in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985036 Petr Menšík changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2021-08-03 08:20:47 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1939391] Review Request: python-getkey - Read single characters and key-strokes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939391 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Status|POST|CLOSED Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Last Closed||2021-08-03 08:16:24 --- Comment #4 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- I no longer need this, so I'm going to close the request, since it never built due to missing doublex, and orphan the package. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1939391] Review Request: python-getkey - Read single characters and key-strokes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939391 Bug 1939391 depends on bug 1939390, which changed state. Bug 1939390 Summary: Review Request: python-doublex - Python test doubles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939390 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1939390] Review Request: python-doublex - Python test doubles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939390 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Last Closed||2021-08-03 08:14:19 --- Comment #3 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- I actually no longer need this, so I'm abandoning this review. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1984793] Review Request: perl-Module-cpmfile - Parse cpmfile
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984793 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Module-cpmfile-0.001-1 ||.fc35 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2021-08-03 08:01:14 --- Comment #4 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Thank you for the review and the repository. I updated package due to review comments. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
