[Bug 2184592] Review Request: mingw-gsettings-desktop-schemas - MinGW Windows gsettings-desktop-schemas
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184592
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(benson_muite@emai |
|lplus.org) |
--- Comment #3 from Benson Muite ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: mingw32-gsettings-desktop-schemas : /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
root/mingw/include/gsettings-desktop-schemas/gdesktop-enums.h
mingw64-gsettings-desktop-schemas : /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-
root/mingw/include/gsettings-desktop-schemas/gdesktop-enums.h
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/#_devel_packages
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License,
Version 2.1", "*No copyright* GNU Lesser General Public License", "GNU
Lesser General Public License v2.1 or later". 105 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/FedoraPackaging/reviews/mingw-gsettings-desktop-
schemas/2184592-mingw-gsettings-desktop-schemas/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
root/mingw/share/GConf, /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
root/mingw/share/GConf/gsettings, /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-
root/mingw/share/GConf, /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-
root/mingw/share/GConf/gsettings
[ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
root/mingw/share/glib-2.0/schemas, /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-
root/mingw/share/GConf, /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-
root/mingw/share/glib-2.0, /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-
root/mingw/share/GConf/gsettings, /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-
root/mingw/share/glib-2.0/schemas, /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
root/mingw/share/GConf, /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
root/mingw/share/GConf/gsettings, /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
root/mingw/share/glib-2.0
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large
[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/obs-studio -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399
Carl George 鸞 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--- Comment #37 from Carl George 鸞 ---
Package is approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in obs-
studio-libs , obs-studio-devel
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[-]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
[Bug 2182963] Review Request: fonts-compare - Tool to compare fonts for a language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182963 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2023-04-19 01:38:33 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-63df8aa409 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182963 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2176670] Review Request: fedora-iot-config - ostree configuration file for Fedora IoT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176670 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2023-04-19 01:38:48 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-8dcfdd9e10 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176670 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2185388] Review Request: R-ica - Independent Component Analysis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185388 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2023-04-19 01:38:35 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-5670b8caf4 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185388 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2166239] Review Request: ghc-fmt - A new formatting library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166239 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2023-04-19 01:38:31 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-f81da0100b has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166239 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2185389] Review Request: R-metaheuristicopt - Metaheuristics for Optimization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185389 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2023-04-19 01:38:37 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-a1be09c10b has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185389 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187678] Review Request: rust-lddtree - Read the ELF dependency tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187678 Maxwell G changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST Flags||fedora-review+ Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|maxw...@gtmx.me CC||maxw...@gtmx.me Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #2 from Maxwell G --- This package was generated using rust2rpm, which simplifies the review. Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated - [x] The specfile is sane. - [x] The latest version is packaged or packaging an earlier version is justified. - [x] The License tag uses the correct identifiers, and it reflects the package contents and Cargo metadata. - [x] The license text is included in the package and is marked with %license. - [x] The package builds successfully in mock. - [x] Package is installable (checked by fedora-review). - [x] There are no relevant rpmlint errors. - [x] The package runs tests in %check. - [x] The package complies with the Rust and general Packaging Guidelines. Package approved. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187678 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187670] Review Request: rust-cargo-options - Reusable common Cargo command line options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187670 --- Comment #3 from Maxwell G --- > (There are some warnings about zero length test files.) Hmm, should the tests be excluded from the package all together? In other packaging ecosystems I'm involved with (e.g. Python and Ansible collections), it's standard to remove the tests from the built package even if upstream installs them, but I'm not sure if Rust is different in this regard. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187670 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187670] Review Request: rust-cargo-options - Reusable common Cargo command line options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187670 Maxwell G changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|maxw...@gtmx.me CC||maxw...@gtmx.me Status|NEW |POST Flags||fedora-review+ Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #2 from Maxwell G --- This package was generated using rust2rpm, which simplifies the review. Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated - [x] The specfile is sane. - [x] The latest version is packaged or packaging an earlier version is justified. - [x] The License tag uses the correct identifiers, and it reflects the package contents and Cargo metadata. - [x] The license text is included in the package and is marked with %license. - [x] The package builds successfully in mock. - [x] Package is installable (checked by fedora-review). - [x] There are no relevant rpmlint errors. (There are some warnings about zero length test files.) - [-] (Justified with a comment in the specfile) The package runs tests in %check. - [x] The package complies with the Rust and general Packaging Guidelines. Package approved. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187670 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187668] Review Request: rust-cargo-config2 - Load and resolve Cargo configuration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187668 Maxwell G changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maxw...@gtmx.me Flags||fedora-review+ Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|maxw...@gtmx.me Status|NEW |POST --- Comment #2 from Maxwell G --- This package was generated using rust2rpm, which simplifies the review. Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated - [x] The specfile is sane. - [-] (justified) The latest version is packaged - [x] The License tag reflects the package contents and uses the correct identifiers. - [x] The license text is included in the package and is marked with %license. - [x] The package builds successfully in mock. - [x] Package is installable (checked by fedora-review). - [x] There are no relevant rpmlint errors. - [x] The package runs tests in %check. - [x] The package complies with the Rust and general Packaging Guidelines. Package approved. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187668 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2160214] Review Request: golang-github-alecthomas-assert-2 - A simple assertion library using Go generics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160214 W. Michael Petullo changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Last Closed||2023-04-18 21:52:55 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160214 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187845] golang-github-bep-lazycache - Thread safe in-memory LRU cache with non-blocking cache priming on cache misses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187845 W. Michael Petullo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1930952 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930952 [Bug 1930952] hugo-0.111.3 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187845 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187845] New: golang-github-bep-lazycache - Thread safe in-memory LRU cache with non-blocking cache priming on cache misses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187845 Bug ID: 2187845 Summary: golang-github-bep-lazycache - Thread safe in-memory LRU cache with non-blocking cache priming on cache misses Product: Fedora Version: rawhide OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@flyn.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/112.0 Build Identifier: Spec URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/golang-github-bep-lazycache.spec SRPM URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/golang-github-bep-lazycache-0.2.0-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: Thread safe in-memory LRU cache with non-blocking cache priming on cache misses. Fedora Account System Username: mikep Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187845 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187844] Review Request: golang-github-hashicorp-lru-2 - Golang LRU cache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187844 W. Michael Petullo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1930952 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930952 [Bug 1930952] hugo-0.111.3 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187844 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187844] New: Review Request: golang-github-hashicorp-lru-2 - Golang LRU cache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187844 Bug ID: 2187844 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-hashicorp-lru-2 - Golang LRU cache Product: Fedora Version: rawhide OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@flyn.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/112.0 Build Identifier: Spec URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/golang-github-hashicorp-lru-2.spec SRPM URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/golang-github-hashicorp-lru-2-2.0.2-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: Golang LRU cache. Fedora Account System Username: mikep Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187844 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187698] Review Request: maturin - Build and publish Rust crates as Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187698 --- Comment #5 from Fabio Valentini --- Thanks for the quick review! I've ported the spec to the pyproject macros, de-duplicated the version definition. I also added running the Rust tests, which I somehow forgot to add initially (there are no Python tests). diff here: https://github.com/decathorpe/maturin-rpms/commit/4109533 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187698 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187698] Review Request: maturin - Build and publish Rust crates as Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187698
Maxwell G changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maxw...@gtmx.me
--- Comment #4 from Maxwell G ---
You should use the pyproject macros here. %py3_build and %py3_install are
deprecated.
> %global pypi_version 1.0.0b7
I don't like this, as you now have to change two places to update the package.
Something like
%{version_no_tilde %{quote:%{nil}}}
or
%(echo %{version} | tr -d "~")
would be better.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187698
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187797] New: Review Request: rust-tracing-subscriber - Utilities for implementing and composing tracing subscribers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187797 Bug ID: 2187797 Summary: Review Request: rust-tracing-subscriber - Utilities for implementing and composing tracing subscribers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-tracing-subscriber.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-tracing-subscriber-0.3.16-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: Utilities for implementing and composing `tracing` subscribers. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187797 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187798] Review Request: rust-matchers - Regex matching on character and byte streams
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187798 --- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=100105444 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187798 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187798] New: Review Request: rust-matchers - Regex matching on character and byte streams
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187798 Bug ID: 2187798 Summary: Review Request: rust-matchers - Regex matching on character and byte streams Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-matchers.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-matchers-0.1.0-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: Regex matching on character and byte streams. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187798 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187797] Review Request: rust-tracing-subscriber - Utilities for implementing and composing tracing subscribers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187797 --- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=100105504 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187797 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187791] Review Request: rust-tracing-serde - Compatibility layer for serializing trace data with serde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187791 --- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=100105361 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187791 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187791] New: Review Request: rust-tracing-serde - Compatibility layer for serializing trace data with serde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187791 Bug ID: 2187791 Summary: Review Request: rust-tracing-serde - Compatibility layer for serializing trace data with serde Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-tracing-serde.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-tracing-serde-0.1.3-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: A compatibility layer for serializing trace data with `serde`. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187791 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187781] New: Review Request: rust-trust-dns-server - Trust-DNS is a safe and secure DNS server with DNSSec support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187781 Bug ID: 2187781 Summary: Review Request: rust-trust-dns-server - Trust-DNS is a safe and secure DNS server with DNSSec support Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-trust-dns-server.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-trust-dns-server-0.22.0-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: Trust-DNS is a safe and secure DNS server with DNSSec support. Eventually this could be a replacement for BIND9. The DNSSec support allows for live signing of all records, in it does not currently support records signed offline. The server supports dynamic DNS with SIG0 authenticated requests. Trust-DNS is based on the Tokio and Futures libraries, which means it should be easily integrated into other software that also use those libraries. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187781 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187780] Review Request: rust-trust-dns-recursor - Trust-DNS Recursor is a safe and secure DNS recursive resolver with DNSSec support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187780 --- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=100104608 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187780 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2179161] Review Request: rust-gst-plugin-reqwest - GStreamer reqwest HTTP Source Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179161 --- Comment #10 from Fabio Valentini --- > This is unnecessarily punitive Punitive? *I* am the one who's waiting for approval here :D I would've been fine with waiting until it's cleared up in the docs ... I just didn't want to submit a package that - in my opinion - violates the Packaging Guidelines, but if it will be approved like this, fine ... (files updated). I opened a ticket so we don't forget: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1273 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179161 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187781] Review Request: rust-trust-dns-server - Trust-DNS is a safe and secure DNS server with DNSSec support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187781 --- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=100104620 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187781 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187780] New: Review Request: rust-trust-dns-recursor - Trust-DNS Recursor is a safe and secure DNS recursive resolver with DNSSec support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187780 Bug ID: 2187780 Summary: Review Request: rust-trust-dns-recursor - Trust-DNS Recursor is a safe and secure DNS recursive resolver with DNSSec support Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-trust-dns-recursor.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-trust-dns-recursor-0.22.0-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: Trust-DNS Recursor is a safe and secure DNS recursive resolver with DNSSec support. Trust-DNS is based on the Tokio and Futures libraries, which means it should be easily integrated into other software that also use those libraries. This library can be used as in the server and binary for performing recursive lookups. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187780 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2179161] Review Request: rust-gst-plugin-reqwest - GStreamer reqwest HTTP Source Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179161
--- Comment #9 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #8)
> I've updated the files at the original URLs with two changes:
>
> - License tag contains no more simplifications (other than the "allowed"
> ones, for example that "(A OR B)" and "(B OR A)" are equivalent).
> - Added "Provides: gstreamer1-plugin-reqwest = %{version}-%{release}" to the
> gst-plugin-reqwest subpackage.
>
> If you want that latter one to be the other way round (i.e. "subpackage name
> = gstreamer1-plugin-reqwest", and "provides = gst-plugin-reqwest"), then
> please go through FPC to document this exception to the Packaging Guidelines
> (i.e. add a section for GStreamer plugins here:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/
> #_addon_packages).
This is unnecessarily punitive given that every other gst plugin package is
"gstreamer1-plugin-".
Please just flip it and we can reconcile it in the documentation after the
fact.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179161
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187762] New: Review Request: rust-zvariant_utils - Various utilities used internally by the zvariant crate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187762 Bug ID: 2187762 Summary: Review Request: rust-zvariant_utils - Various utilities used internally by the zvariant crate Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-zvariant_utils.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-zvariant_utils-1.0.0-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: Various utilities used internally by the zvariant crate. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187762 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187762] Review Request: rust-zvariant_utils - Various utilities used internally by the zvariant crate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187762 --- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=100103548 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187762 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2179161] Review Request: rust-gst-plugin-reqwest - GStreamer reqwest HTTP Source Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179161
--- Comment #8 from Fabio Valentini ---
I've updated the files at the original URLs with two changes:
- License tag contains no more simplifications (other than the "allowed" ones,
for example that "(A OR B)" and "(B OR A)" are equivalent).
- Added "Provides: gstreamer1-plugin-reqwest = %{version}-%{release}" to the
gst-plugin-reqwest subpackage.
If you want that latter one to be the other way round (i.e. "subpackage name =
gstreamer1-plugin-reqwest", and "provides = gst-plugin-reqwest"), then please
go through FPC to document this exception to the Packaging Guidelines (i.e. add
a section for GStreamer plugins here:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_addon_packages).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179161
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2163447] Review Request: mustach - Tiny Mustach processor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163447 --- Comment #15 from ha...@kit.edu --- Ok, I've updated the spec, and placed the SRPM to our repo server. I'm constantly interrupted by other work, unfortunately. Updated SRPM URL: http://repo.data.kit.edu/files/mustach-1.2.5-1.fc37.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163447 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187050] Review Request: golang-github-bmatcuk-doublestar - Support for double star (**) matches in golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187050 Pavel Solovev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Last Closed||2023-04-18 14:04:12 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187050 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2050169] Review Request: optee_client - OP-TEE Client API and supplicant
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050169 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/optee_client -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050169 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2050169] Review Request: optee_client - OP-TEE Client API and supplicant
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050169
Paul Whalen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Paul Whalen ---
Looks good, approved. Review posted below:
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages
[Bug 2022555] Review Request: lv2-eq10q - LV2 audio plugin suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022555 Nils Philippsen changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(code@musicinmybra ||in.net) --- Comment #7 from Nils Philippsen --- That said, @c...@musicinmybrain.net, still interested? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022555 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187698] New: Review Request: maturin - Build and publish Rust crates as Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187698 Bug ID: 2187698 Summary: Review Request: maturin - Build and publish Rust crates as Python packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/maturin.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/maturin-1.0.0~b7-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: Build and publish crates with pyo3, rust-cpython and cffi bindings as well as rust binaries as python packages. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187698 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2022555] Review Request: lv2-eq10q - LV2 audio plugin suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022555 --- Comment #6 from Nils Philippsen --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > Is that all you're asking from me as needinfo? Sorry, the needinfo was unintentional (happened because I (at)-tagged you). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022555 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187682] Review Request: rust-pep508_rs - Library for python dependency specifiers, better known as PEP 508
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187682 --- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini --- Successful COPR build with dependencies: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/decathorpe/maturin/build/5802134/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187682 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187694] New: Review Request: rust-python-pkginfo - Parse Python package metadata from sdist and bdists and etc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187694 Bug ID: 2187694 Summary: Review Request: rust-python-pkginfo - Parse Python package metadata from sdist and bdists and etc Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-python-pkginfo.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-python-pkginfo-0.5.5-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: Parse Python package metadata from sdist and bdists and etc. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187694 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187688] New: Review Request: rust-rfc2047-decoder - Rust library for decoding RFC 2047 MIME Message Headers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187688 Bug ID: 2187688 Summary: Review Request: rust-rfc2047-decoder - Rust library for decoding RFC 2047 MIME Message Headers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-rfc2047-decoder.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-rfc2047-decoder-0.2.2-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: Rust library for decoding RFC 2047 MIME Message Headers. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187688 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187687] New: Review Request: rust-pyproject-toml - Pyproject.toml parser in Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187687 Bug ID: 2187687 Summary: Review Request: rust-pyproject-toml - Pyproject.toml parser in Rust Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-pyproject-toml.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-pyproject-toml-0.5.1-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: Pyproject.toml parser in Rust. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187687 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187682] New: Review Request: rust-pep508_rs - Library for python dependency specifiers, better known as PEP 508
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187682 Bug ID: 2187682 Summary: Review Request: rust-pep508_rs - Library for python dependency specifiers, better known as PEP 508 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-pep508_rs.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-pep508_rs-0.1.5-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: A library for python dependency specifiers, better known as PEP 508. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187682 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187680] New: Review Request: rust-fat-macho - Mach-O Fat Binary Reader and Writer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187680 Bug ID: 2187680 Summary: Review Request: rust-fat-macho - Mach-O Fat Binary Reader and Writer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-fat-macho.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-fat-macho-0.4.6-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: Mach-O Fat Binary Reader and Writer. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187680 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187677] Review Request: rust-pep440_rs - Library for python version numbers and specifiers, implementing PEP 440
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187677 --- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=100099115 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187677 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187677] New: Review Request: rust-pep440_rs - Library for python version numbers and specifiers, implementing PEP 440
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187677 Bug ID: 2187677 Summary: Review Request: rust-pep440_rs - Library for python version numbers and specifiers, implementing PEP 440 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-pep440_rs.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-pep440_rs-0.3.5-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: A library for python version numbers and specifiers, implementing PEP 440. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187677 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187678] Review Request: rust-lddtree - Read the ELF dependency tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187678 --- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=100098993 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187678 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187679] Review Request: rust-llvm-bitcode - LLVM Bitcode parser in Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187679 --- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=100099024 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187679 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187678] New: Review Request: rust-lddtree - Read the ELF dependency tree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187678 Bug ID: 2187678 Summary: Review Request: rust-lddtree - Read the ELF dependency tree Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-lddtree.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-lddtree-0.3.2-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: Read the ELF dependency tree. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187678 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187679] New: Review Request: rust-llvm-bitcode - LLVM Bitcode parser in Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187679 Bug ID: 2187679 Summary: Review Request: rust-llvm-bitcode - LLVM Bitcode parser in Rust Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-llvm-bitcode.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-llvm-bitcode-0.1.2-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: LLVM Bitcode parser in Rust. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187679 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187672] New: Review Request: rust-chumsky - Parser library for humans with powerful error recovery
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187672 Bug ID: 2187672 Summary: Review Request: rust-chumsky - Parser library for humans with powerful error recovery Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-chumsky.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-chumsky-0.9.2-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: A parser library for humans with powerful error recovery. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187672 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187672] Review Request: rust-chumsky - Parser library for humans with powerful error recovery
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187672 --- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=100098746 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187672 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187670] New: Review Request: rust-cargo-options - Reusable common Cargo command line options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187670 Bug ID: 2187670 Summary: Review Request: rust-cargo-options - Reusable common Cargo command line options Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-cargo-options.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-cargo-options-0.6.0-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: Reusable common Cargo command line options. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187670 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187670] Review Request: rust-cargo-options - Reusable common Cargo command line options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187670 --- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=100098622 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187670 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187668] Review Request: rust-cargo-config2 - Load and resolve Cargo configuration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187668 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini --- koji scratch build for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=100098479 Note: I am packaging v0.1.6 intentionally, even though v0.1.7 is the latest version. However, v0.1.7 depends on v0.15 of the cfg-expr crate, which is still at v0.14 in Fedora, and can't easily be updated to v0.15 right now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187668 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187668] New: Review Request: rust-cargo-config2 - Load and resolve Cargo configuration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187668 Bug ID: 2187668 Summary: Review Request: rust-cargo-config2 - Load and resolve Cargo configuration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-cargo-config2.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-cargo-config2-0.1.6-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: Load and resolve Cargo configuration. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187668 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2186056] Review Request: python-pylint-venv - Make pylint respect virtualenvs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186056 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186056 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187643] Review Request: perl-Hash-Ordered - Perl class for ordered hashes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187643 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2187275 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187275 [Bug 2187275] perl-User-Identity-1.02 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187643 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187643] Review Request: perl-Hash-Ordered - Perl class for ordered hashes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187643 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Hash-Ordered/perl-Hash-Ordered.spec SRPM URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Hash-Ordered/perl-Hash-Ordered-0.014-1.fc39.src.rpm Description: This module implements an ordered hash, meaning that it associates keys with values like a Perl hash, but keeps the keys in a consistent order. Because it is implemented as an object and manipulated with method calls, it is much slower than a Perl hash. This is the cost of keeping order. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187643 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187643] Review Request: perl-Hash-Ordered - Perl class for ordered hashes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187643 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/112.0 Build Identifier: Spec URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Hash-Ordered/perl-Hash-Ordered.spec SRPM URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Hash-Ordered/perl-Hash-Ordered-0.014-1.fc39.src.rpm Description: This module implements an ordered hash, meaning that it associates keys with values like a Perl hash, but keeps the keys in a consistent order. Because it is implemented as an object and manipulated with method calls, it is much slower than a Perl hash. This is the cost of keeping order. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187643 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187643] New: Review Request: perl-Hash-Ordered - Perl class for ordered hashes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187643 Bug ID: 2187643 Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-Ordered - Perl class for ordered hashes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/112.0 Build Identifier: Spec URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Hash-Ordered/perl-Hash-Ordered.spec SRPM URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Hash-Ordered/perl-Hash-Ordered-0.014-1.fc39.src.rpm Description: This module implements an ordered hash, meaning that it associates keys with values like a Perl hash, but keeps the keys in a consistent order. Because it is implemented as an object and manipulated with method calls, it is much slower than a Perl hash. This is the cost of keeping order. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187643 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2022555] Review Request: lv2-eq10q - LV2 audio plugin suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022555 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(jwak...@redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, pstreams-devel is unretired and available in all of f36/f37/f38/rawhide. Is that all you're asking from me as needinfo? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022555 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 1830712] Review Request: kronometer - A simple KDE stopwatch application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830712 Andrea Perotti changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(c...@redhat.com) --- Comment #28 from Andrea Perotti --- (In reply to Carl George 鸞 from comment #23) > Andrea, I can see that you're in the packager group now, so I'm removing > FE-NEEDSPONSOR. I can take this review. Hi Carl, all comments has been addressed, you can find new spec here: Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/andreamtp/kronometer/master/kronometer.spec and builds are available via: # dnf copr enable andreamtp/kronometer I only have some doubts about the test part: I've build the package via `fedpkg --release f38 mockbuild` but even removing the exclusion you mentioned in your comment, I have no error and I got "No tests were found": + /usr/bin/ctest --test-dir redhat-linux-build --output-on-failure --force-new-ctest-process -j8 --verbose Internal ctest changing into directory: /builddir/build/BUILD/kronometer-2.3.0/redhat-linux-build UpdateCTestConfiguration from :/builddir/build/BUILD/kronometer-2.3.0/redhat-linux-build/DartConfiguration.tcl UpdateCTestConfiguration from :/builddir/build/BUILD/kronometer-2.3.0/redhat-linux-build/DartConfiguration.tcl Test project /builddir/build/BUILD/kronometer-2.3.0/redhat-linux-build Constructing a list of tests Updating test list for fixtures Added 0 tests to meet fixture requirements Checking test dependency graph... Checking test dependency graph end No tests were found!!! Do you have any hint in this regard? thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830712 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Review Service --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5800381 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2165399-obs-studio/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05800381-obs-studio/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Review Service --- Created attachment 1957940 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1957940=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5749313 to 5800381 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2165399] Review Request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 --- Comment #34 from Neal Gompa --- qsv11's license stanza has been extracted and collected as a license file now. Updated librtmp's license clause. Spec URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/obs-studio.spec SRPM URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/obs-studio-29.1.0~beta4-0.fc39.5.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165399 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
