[Bug 1872427] Review Request: ec2-hibinit-agent - support for hibernation for Amazon ec2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872427 --- Comment #54 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-642382d570 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-642382d570` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-642382d570 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872427 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 1872427] Review Request: ec2-hibinit-agent - support for hibernation for Amazon ec2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872427 --- Comment #53 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-4edd939f66 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-4edd939f66` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-4edd939f66 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872427 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2210898] New: Review Request: rust-http-auth - HTTP authentication: parse challenge lists, respond to Basic and Digest challenges
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210898 Bug ID: 2210898 Summary: Review Request: rust-http-auth - HTTP authentication: parse challenge lists, respond to Basic and Digest challenges Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-http-auth.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-http-auth-0.1.8-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: HTTP authentication: parse challenge lists, respond to Basic and Digest challenges. Likely to be extended with server support and additional auth schemes. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210898 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2210898] Review Request: rust-http-auth - HTTP authentication: parse challenge lists, respond to Basic and Digest challenges
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210898 --- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101632821 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210898 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2210897] New: Review Request: rust-orion - Usable, easy and safe pure-Rust crypto
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210897 Bug ID: 2210897 Summary: Review Request: rust-orion - Usable, easy and safe pure-Rust crypto Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-orion.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-orion-0.17.4-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: Usable, easy and safe pure-Rust crypto. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210897 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2210896] New: Review Request: rust-ed25519-compact - Small, self-contained, wasm-friendly Ed25519 implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210896 Bug ID: 2210896 Summary: Review Request: rust-ed25519-compact - Small, self-contained, wasm-friendly Ed25519 implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-ed25519-compact.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-ed25519-compact-2.0.4-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: A small, self-contained, wasm-friendly Ed25519 implementation. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210896 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2210895] Review Request: rust-ct-codecs - Constant-time hex and base64 codecs from libsodium reimplemented in Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210895 --- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101632829 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210895 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2210895] New: Review Request: rust-ct-codecs - Constant-time hex and base64 codecs from libsodium reimplemented in Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210895 Bug ID: 2210895 Summary: Review Request: rust-ct-codecs - Constant-time hex and base64 codecs from libsodium reimplemented in Rust Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-ct-codecs.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-ct-codecs-1.1.1-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: Constant-time hex and base64 codecs from libsodium reimplemented in Rust. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210895 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2209378] Review Request: rust-html2text - Render HTML as plain text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209378 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2023-05-30 00:25:51 --- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini --- Imported and built: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-dd54df6fce -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209378 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2191661] Review Request: python-bsmschema - BIDS Stats Models Schema
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2191661 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-f9fcfdcf26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-f9fcfdcf26 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2191661 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2191661] Review Request: python-bsmschema - BIDS Stats Models Schema
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2191661 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2023-05-30 00:19:28 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-f9fcfdcf26 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2191661 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2191661] Review Request: python-bsmschema - BIDS Stats Models Schema
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2191661 Ben Beasley changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2191661 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2191661] Review Request: python-bsmschema - BIDS Stats Models Schema
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2191661 --- Comment #4 from Ben Beasley --- Thanks! I’m glad you are looking closely at these details. I would rather respond to a concern that turns out to be unfounded than have a careless review. I am setting the status back to ASSIGNED since this is required when requesting the dist-git repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2191661 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2191661] Review Request: python-bsmschema - BIDS Stats Models Schema
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2191661 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-bsmschema -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2191661 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2210816] Review Request: rust-option-ext - Extends Option with additional operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210816 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2023-05-30 00:01:52 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-c819ea1ca6 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210816 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2210816] Review Request: rust-option-ext - Extends Option with additional operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210816 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-c819ea1ca6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-c819ea1ca6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210816 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 1872427] Review Request: ec2-hibinit-agent - support for hibernation for Amazon ec2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872427 --- Comment #52 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-4edd939f66 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-4edd939f66 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872427 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2209378] Review Request: rust-html2text - Render HTML as plain text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209378 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-html2text -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209378 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2209378] Review Request: rust-html2text - Render HTML as plain text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209378 --- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini --- Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209378 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 1872427] Review Request: ec2-hibinit-agent - support for hibernation for Amazon ec2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872427 --- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-642382d570 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-642382d570 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872427 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2209450] Review Request: rust-minijinja - Powerful template engine for Rust with minimal dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209450 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|POST|CLOSED Last Closed||2023-05-29 22:23:25 --- Comment #5 from Fabio Valentini --- Imported and built: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-fbc58027f5 Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209450 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187797] Review Request: rust-tracing-subscriber - Utilities for implementing and composing tracing subscribers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187797 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|POST|CLOSED Last Closed||2023-05-29 21:43:50 --- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini --- Imported and built: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-60b9675c1f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187797 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2191661] Review Request: python-bsmschema - BIDS Stats Models Schema
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2191661 Sandro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Sandro --- Thanks for the detailed explanation. I was being mislead by the split of the repo. What is being published on PyPI and what is contained in the distribution tarball is actually the bsmschema/ directory of the repo. And that indeed contains another LICENSE file with the Apache license text in it. All good => APPROVED! Sorry about the noise. ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2191661 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2209450] Review Request: rust-minijinja - Powerful template engine for Rust with minimal dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209450 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-minijinja -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209450 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2210816] Review Request: rust-option-ext - Extends Option with additional operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210816 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-option-ext -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210816 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2210816] Review Request: rust-option-ext - Extends Option with additional operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210816 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210816 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2209450] Review Request: rust-minijinja - Powerful template engine for Rust with minimal dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209450
blinxen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|h-k...@hotmail.com
Status|NEW |POST
Flags||fedora-review+
CC||h-k...@hotmail.com
--- Comment #3 from blinxen ---
Taking this review
General commnets:
- Package was generated with rust2rpm and some features were removed
- Removed features are not needed at the moment and they require additional
packages to be included. Should be OK for now. They can still be added later on
if they are needed by some other package.
APPROVED
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0". 45
files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/rust-minijinja/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
Note: Couldn't connect to Pagure, check manually
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust-
minijinja-devel ,
[Bug 2210816] Review Request: rust-option-ext - Extends Option with additional operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210816
blinxen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|h-k...@hotmail.com
Status|NEW |POST
Flags||fedora-review+
CC||h-k...@hotmail.com
--- Comment #2 from blinxen ---
Taking this review
General comments:
- Package was generated with rust2rpm and no changes were made
APPROVED
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Mozilla Public License
2.0". 5 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/rust-option-ext/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust-
option-ext-devel , rust-option-ext+default-devel
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
[Bug 2187781] Review Request: rust-trust-dns-server - Trust-DNS is a safe and secure DNS server with DNSSec support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187781 --- Comment #5 from Fabio Valentini --- I've pushed a workaround for the enum-as-inner breakage, this package should be buildable against latest rawhide (i.e. with "mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --enablerepo local"). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187781 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187797] Review Request: rust-tracing-subscriber - Utilities for implementing and composing tracing subscribers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187797 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-tracing-subscriber -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187797 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187797] Review Request: rust-tracing-subscriber - Utilities for implementing and composing tracing subscribers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187797 --- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini --- Thanks for the review! (In reply to blinxen from comment #3) > Taking this review > > General comments: > > - Package was generated with rust2rpm and a feature was removed > - Feature appears to be unstable, so I guess this is OK The removed features are gated behind a custom `--cfg` flag, which needs to be passed as RUSTFLAGS="--cfg tracing_unstable" environment variable, which is not supported for RPM builds, so removing them is the only sensible thing we can do. > - Tests were deactivated because they rely on an unpublished crate. I guess > this is OK but what is normally done here? Should this be reported to > upstream? I don't think this is useful to report to upstream. They choose not to publish the crate that's needed to run the tests, so there's not much we can do. > - Version 0.3.17 was published I will update the package before I import it. > APPROVED Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187797 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2145116] Review Request: rust-serde-sarif - Serde serialization for SARIF files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2145116 blinxen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||h-k...@hotmail.com Flags||needinfo?(jama...@redhat.co ||m) --- Comment #1 from blinxen --- Do you still need this package? The provided URLs result in a 404. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2145116 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2209378] Review Request: rust-html2text - Render HTML as plain text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209378
blinxen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h-k...@hotmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|h-k...@hotmail.com
Status|NEW |POST
--- Comment #3 from blinxen ---
Taking this review
General comments:
- Package was generated with rust2rpm and no changes were made
APPROVED
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "MIT License", "Apache License (v2.0)
or MIT license". 19 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/rust-
html2text/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust-
html2text-devel , rust-html2text+default-devel , rust-
html2text+ansi_colours-devel , rust-html2text+backtrace-devel , rust-
html2text+html_trace-devel , rust-html2text+html_trace_bt-devel
[x]: Package functions as described.
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first
[Bug 2050682] Review Request: lemonldap-ng - Web Single Sign On (SSO) and Access Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(emmanuel@seyman.f | |r) | --- Comment #16 from Emmanuel Seyman --- FTR, I've restarted the review but it's going to take a few days (this is a complex spec file). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050682 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2191661] Review Request: python-bsmschema - BIDS Stats Models Schema
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2191661 --- Comment #2 from Ben Beasley --- Thank you for the review! (In reply to Sandro from comment #1) > > [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > > => The LICENSE file is for CC-BY-4.0. On GitHub the commit for the LICENSE > file states: > "Licensing: CC-BY-4.0 for text, Apache2 for code". I'm not sure what "text" > the CC-BY-4.0 > license applies to, but the license text for Apache-2.0 appears no to be > included. > > Upstream probably needs to include the Apache-2.0 text in the LICENSE file > as well. So, if you look at https://github.com/bids-standard/stats-models, you’ll see a top-level LICENSE file that is CC-BY-4.0, and a README.md that says: This repository is intended to be the authoritative reference for the BIDS Stats Models specification. It consists of two parts: 1. bsmschema, a Pydantic description of the BIDS Stats Models files, which can be used as a schema validator or generate JSON schema for independent validation. 2. specification, a JupyterBook website that includes more human readable introductions and explanations, as well as a reference document for bsmschema. In this context, it seems clear that the “text” that is CC-BY-4.0 is meant to be the contents of specification/, and the “code” is meant to be the contents of bsmschema/. Since the Python package doesn’t need anything from specification/, I package from the PyPI sdist, which only contains files from bsmschema/. Thus, if you look at the top-level LICENSE file in the source archive, you’ll find it is actually https://github.com/bids-standard/stats-models/blob/0.1.0/bsmschema/LICENSE, which is the Apache-2.0 license text. Since this sdist pretty clearly contains only “code,” I think it’s safe to say that CC-BY-4.0 does not apply. Furthermore, you can verify that pyproject-rpm-macros does handle the license file properly: $ rpm -qL -p review-python-bsmschema/results/python3-bsmschema-0.1.0-1.fc39.noarch.rpm /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/bsmschema-0.1.0.dist-info/licenses/LICENSE ...and inspection of its contents confirms it is the Apache-2.0 text. Let me know if you find any discrepancies in the above. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2191661 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187781] Review Request: rust-trust-dns-server - Trust-DNS is a safe and secure DNS server with DNSSec support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187781 --- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini --- Yeah this is unfortunate ... the latest version of enum-as-inner introduced a breaking change. I already commented on the enum-as-inner ticket you linked to propose two possible fixes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187781 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187781] Review Request: rust-trust-dns-server - Trust-DNS is a safe and secure DNS server with DNSSec support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187781 blinxen changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|h-k...@hotmail.com CC||h-k...@hotmail.com Flags||fedora-review? Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from blinxen --- Taking this review I tried building this package in rawhide but I get a compile error. See https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/blinxen/fedora-review-rust-trust-dns-server/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05977616-rust-trust-dns-server/builder-live.log.gz Related github issues: - https://github.com/bluejekyll/trust-dns/issues/1946 - https://github.com/bluejekyll/enum-as-inner/issues/98 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187781 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2187797] Review Request: rust-tracing-subscriber - Utilities for implementing and composing tracing subscribers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187797
blinxen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||h-k...@hotmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|h-k...@hotmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from blinxen ---
Taking this review
General comments:
- Package was generated with rust2rpm and a feature was removed
- Feature appears to be unstable, so I guess this is OK
- Tests were deactivated because they rely on an unpublished crate. I guess
this is OK but what is normally done here? Should this be reported to upstream?
- Version 0.3.17 was published
APPROVED
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "MIT License", "*No copyright* MIT
License". 76 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/rust-tracing-
subscriber/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rust-
tracing-subscriber-devel , rust-tracing-subscriber+default-devel ,
rust-tracing-subscriber+alloc-devel , rust-tracing-subscriber+ansi-
[Bug 2173178] Review Request: kde-inotify-survey - inotify monitor for kde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178 Steve Cossette changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|POST|CLOSED Last Closed||2023-05-29 18:31:36 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2209450] Review Request: rust-minijinja - Powerful template engine for Rust with minimal dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209450 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini --- Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-minijinja.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-minijinja-0.33.0-1.fc38.src.rpm Updated to version 0.33.0 and enabled the "custom_syntax" feature (depends on rust-aho-corasick >= 1.0.0, only landed in rawhide today). This package is necessary for enabling the "scaffolding" feature of maturin. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209450 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2180418] Review Request: input-remapper - An easy to use tool to change the mapping of your input device buttons
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180418 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Last Closed||2023-05-29 18:19:28 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-e7bae8683c has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180418 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2180418] Review Request: input-remapper - An easy to use tool to change the mapping of your input device buttons
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180418 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-e7bae8683c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-e7bae8683c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180418 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2209193] Review Request: python-ratinabox - A package for simulating motion and ephys data in continuous environments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209193 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2023-05-29 17:58:28 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-900dba6058 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209193 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2209193] Review Request: python-ratinabox - A package for simulating motion and ephys data in continuous environments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209193 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-900dba6058 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-900dba6058 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209193 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2209193] Review Request: python-ratinabox - A package for simulating motion and ephys data in continuous environments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209193 --- Comment #3 from Ben Beasley --- Thank you for the review! Please note that you should generally edit the fedora-review output to remove the initial template instructions, and ensure that each “[ ]” is replaced with something else to indicate you have at least considered the line-item. I have requested the repository and added the distribution mapping to release-monitoring.org. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209193 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2209193] Review Request: python-ratinabox - A package for simulating motion and ephys data in continuous environments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209193 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-ratinabox -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209193 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2190039] Review Request: tepl - Text editor product line library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2190039 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-e83d7a66eb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-e83d7a66eb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2190039 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2173178] Review Request: kde-inotify-survey - inotify monitor for kde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178 --- Comment #48 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions --- The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kde-inotify-survey -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2173178] Review Request: kde-inotify-survey - inotify monitor for kde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
|needinfo?(benson_muite@emai |
|lplus.org) |
--- Comment #47 from Benson Muite ---
Thanks for the changes.
a) In the spec file, the line
Patch:
https://invent.kde.org/system/%{name}/-/commit/efbf77b480c2f5a8c40fadfd169a916a51363a23.diff
should be just
Patch: efbf77b480c2f5a8c40fadfd169a916a51363a23.diff
Urls are only needed for files that will not be put into dist-git. The patch
can also be named
so that one can understand what it does, for example fix-translations.patch
b) In the spec file, rather than globbing:
%{_datadir}/dbus-1/*
please use
%{_datadir}/dbus-1/system-services/org.kde.kded.inotify.service
%{_datadir}/dbus-1/system.d/org.kde.kded.inotify.conf
Please make the changes upon import.
Approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2210816] Review Request: rust-option-ext - Extends Option with additional operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210816 --- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101614874 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210816 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2210816] New: Review Request: rust-option-ext - Extends Option with additional operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210816 Bug ID: 2210816 Summary: Review Request: rust-option-ext - Extends Option with additional operations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-option-ext.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-option-ext-0.2.0-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: Extends `Option` with additional operations. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210816 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2209024] Review Request: smatch - A static analyzer for C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209024 --- Comment #8 from Benson Muite --- a) Build completed on all architectures: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fed500/smatch/build/5972453/ b) It is possible to download a tarball from repo.or.cz last release is at: https://repo.or.cz/smatch.git/snapshot/2b596bf0d9bc4d0e8dbe3c6d73ef0fbf9a4d1337.tar.gz c) Get warnings during build: Makefile:347: warning: pattern recipe did not update peer target '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/smatch-1.73-1.fc39.aarch64/usr/share/man/man1/smatch_data see https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/smatch/fedora-rawhide-aarch64/05972453-smatch/builder-live.log.gz Related information: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MAKE44#Upgrade/compatibility_impact https://stackoverflow.com/questions/74449959/makefile-warning-pattern-recipe-did-not-update-peer-target May need to send a patch upstream if it will not be fixed by the next release for Fedora 39/40. d) Perhaps add a comment in the spec file that the regular build produces a number of other files that are installed in the bin directory, cgcc, c2xml, test-inspect, semind, sparsec, sparse-llvm Sparse provides these https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sparse so they are not duplicated. e) smdb.py does not seem to be installed, so its license does not need to be listed. f) Should a copy of the BSD 3 Clause license be distributed? cwchash/hashtable.c contains: * * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the * documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209024 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2173178] Review Request: kde-inotify-survey - inotify monitor for kde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178 Steve Cossette changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(benson_muite@emai ||lplus.org) --- Comment #46 from Steve Cossette --- Oh, fair enough. I didn't know that was a thing. I went ahead and updated the spec and created a new src.rpm and uploaded them to the server. I deleted the config off the server too (As it's no longer needed). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2173178] Review Request: kde-inotify-survey - inotify monitor for kde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178 Benson Muite changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(benson_muite@emai | |lplus.org) | --- Comment #45 from Benson Muite --- For c - it will not fetch it, it will just use what is packaged. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2210767] New: Review Request: hunspell-cs - Czech Hunspell dictionary
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210767 Bug ID: 2210767 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-cs - Czech Hunspell dictionary Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/hunspell-cs/hunspell-cs.spec SRPM URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/hunspell-cs/hunspell-cs-0%5e20210220-1.fc39.src.rpm Description: This package contains a Czech dictionary for the Hunspell spelling checker. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210767 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2210761] New: Review Request: mpdevil - A simple music browser for MPD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210761 Bug ID: 2210761 Summary: Review Request: mpdevil - A simple music browser for MPD Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: leigh123li...@googlemail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/mpdevil/mpdevil.spec SRPM URL: https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/mpdevil/mpdevil-1.10.2-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: A simple music browser for MPD Fedora Account System Username: leigh123linux -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210761 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2173178] Review Request: kde-inotify-survey - inotify monitor for kde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178 --- Comment #44 from Steve Cossette --- And for c), If I don't put the URL, how will fedora-review fetch it? Once I have my distgit, I'll remove the URL and simply use the filename, but for now if I remove it I believe that would break the automated review process. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2173178] Review Request: kde-inotify-survey - inotify monitor for kde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178 Steve Cossette changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(benson_muite@emai ||lplus.org) --- Comment #43 from Steve Cossette --- a) Are you maybe looking at an old version of the config file? This is the org.kde.kded.inotify.conf file that is currently on the server: http://www.freedesktop.org/standards/dbus/1.0/busconfig.dtd;> b) That's because of the patch. It's hanging on the "org.kde.kded.inotify.conf" file because it's modified most likely, which is normal in this case. https://api.nicehomeservices.com/images/temp/org.kde.kded.inotify.conf : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : b850ffd8d8a141dcd9a684991213bdff7445f573eb979dbe5b58decd6506d6e7 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : b34a0ce3612f17108603096c23e256f20740dde862d0878d55fb4d3ff3ae9843 https://invent.kde.org/system/kde-inotify-survey/-/archive/v1.0.0/kde-inotify-survey-v1.0.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 8cae21eefb84b16e2a1b93a105cbfd8be8680eb4a74fbff3d2bd024eca4365ba CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 8cae21eefb84b16e2a1b93a105cbfd8be8680eb4a74fbff3d2bd024eca4365ba -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2169357] Review Request: stats-collect - A tool for collecting and visualising system statistics and telemetry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169357 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Review Service --- Created attachment 1967648 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1967648=edit The .spec file difference from Copr build 5850867 to 5972451 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169357 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2169357] Review Request: stats-collect - A tool for collecting and visualising system statistics and telemetry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169357 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Review Service --- Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/5972451 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2169357-stats-collect/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05972451-stats-collect/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169357 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2169357] Review Request: stats-collect - A tool for collecting and visualising system statistics and telemetry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169357 --- Comment #8 from Ali Erdinc Koroglu --- Thank you. SPEC Url: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/aekoroglu/fedora/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05972276-stats-collect/stats-collect.spec SRPM Url: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/aekoroglu/fedora/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05972276-stats-collect/stats-collect-1.0.3-1.fc39.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169357 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2209024] Review Request: smatch - A static analyzer for C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209024 --- Comment #7 from Benson Muite --- Checked with upstream, cgcc, sparsec, sparsei and sparse-llvm-dis are executable scripts so are ok. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209024 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2173178] Review Request: kde-inotify-survey - inotify monitor for kde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178 Benson Muite changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(benson_muite@emai | |lplus.org) | --- Comment #42 from Benson Muite --- Thanks for adding the tests and your patience in getting this package into Fedora. a) Please update org.kde.kded.inotify.conf file to use just org.freedesktop.Notifications rather than * for everything. This has a security implication, and would be best to allow for least required privileges - which is why for example one does not use root, even though it would be convenient. Will check on kauth separately, figure out if something is needed to improve a secure Fedora KDE experience. b) Output of last build : https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2173178-kde-inotify-survey/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05970727-kde-inotify-survey/fedora-review/review.txt indicates: - Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in /var/lib/copr- rpmbuild/results/kde-inotify-survey/diff.txt See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/ c) Finally, in the spec file for the patch and conf file, just give the names, no need to have the url other than as a comment. Perhaps rename the patch file to something more meaningful. When creating the source rpm on your machine, provided the files are in the same directory, they should be incorporated. With those changes expect should be ok. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173178 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2210624] Review Request: tomlplusplus - Header-only TOML config file parser and serializer for C++17.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210624 Felix Wang changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Felix Wang --- update: Spec URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/rpms/tomlplusplus.spec SRPM URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/rpms/tomlplusplus-3.3.0-1.fc39.src.rpm Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101600109 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210624 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2209759] Review Request: rocclr - ROCm Compute Language Runtime
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209759 --- Comment #7 from Philipp K. --- Ok, sry for the noise, but square.hipref.cpp with the latest build that include the patches from RHBZ#2207599 work now. However, I find it a bit odd that this square example pulls in the device libs, even though it is already compiled and does not use hiprtc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209759 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2209759] Review Request: rocclr - ROCm Compute Language Runtime
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209759 --- Comment #6 from Philipp K. --- There also seem to be missing some perl requirements in your current spec: hip-devel needs in hipconfig: perl-Getopt-Long rocm-hip-devel needs in roc-obj-*: perl-URI-Encode Thx for your work :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209759 ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
