[Bug 1208833] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs

2015-05-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||gdouros-aegyptus-fonts-5.03
   ||-0.2.20150430.fc22
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2015-05-10 19:46:42



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gdouros-aegyptus-fonts-5.03-0.2.20150430.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22
stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1208833] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs

2015-05-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package gdouros-aegyptus-fonts-5.03-0.2.20150430.fc22:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing
gdouros-aegyptus-fonts-5.03-0.2.20150430.fc22'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7627/gdouros-aegyptus-fonts-5.03-0.2.20150430.fc22
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1208833] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs

2015-05-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1208833] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs

2015-05-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gdouros-aegyptus-fonts-5.03-0.2.20150430.fc22 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdouros-aegyptus-fonts-5.03-0.2.20150430.fc22

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1208833] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs

2015-05-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1208833] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs

2015-05-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833



--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Complete.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1208833] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs

2015-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833

Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pnem...@redhat.com



--- Comment #12 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com ---
Yes add again CVS request with all the branches where you want to be owner.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1208833] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs

2015-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833

Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1208833] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs

2015-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833



--- Comment #13 from Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts
Branches: f20 f21 f22 master
Owners: alexpl
InitialCC: fonts-sig

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1208833] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs

2015-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833

Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #10 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
The updated srpm in comment#6 looks good now.

Package APPROVED.

You want to submit here package change request to own this package. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#Package_Change_Requests_for_existing_packages

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1208833] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs

2015-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833



--- Comment #11 from Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com ---
Do I need to specify the branches in my request, or is the following
sufficient?

Package Change Request
==
Package Name: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts
Owners: alexpl
InitialCC: fonts-sig


(not setting the cvs flag yet on purpose)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1208833] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs

2015-05-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833



--- Comment #9 from Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #8)
 We package per family fonts. See
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming page. So all
 other fonts need to be packaged as separate fonts and they will provide
 their own metainfo file. Just check all those 3 fonts have no common family
 name all are different.

The thing is that upstream does not follow typographic conventions, so even
though these fonts *should* be in the same family, they are not. You have seen
the structure of his web page; there is some sort of grouping that sometimes
makes sense, others not so much.
On the other hand, he ships Alexander and several others in the TextFonts
package, so at some point we could have gdouros-textfonts-alexander-fonts and
such.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1208833] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs

2015-04-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833



--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
Let's follow the same guideline here.
I propose to follow
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages
with following changes

%global checkout 20150430

Release:0.2.%{checkout}%{?dist}

also add changelog that uses 5.03-0.2.20150430

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1208833] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs

2015-04-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833



--- Comment #4 from Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #2)
 1) Please package per family only and corresponding fontconfig file for that
 font. Drop Nilus* and Gardiner* files, references from spec file. You may
 want to submit them as separate packages.

Is there a way to let users know that they might be interested in the other two
(not yet created) packages, that works regardless of whether they install
packages from the terminal or with a graphical package manager?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1208833] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs

2015-04-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833



--- Comment #5 from Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #4)
 Is there a way to let users know that they might be interested in the other
 two (not yet created) packages, that works regardless of whether they
 install packages from the terminal or with a graphical package manager?

I asked Richard Hughes about that and he suggested that I create a meta-font
that references 3 packages. I'll look into that right after I have updated all
of the spec files and srpms.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1208833] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs

2015-04-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833



--- Comment #6 from Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com ---
Updated files:

https://alexpl.fedorapeople.org/packages/fonts/gdouros/gdouros-aegyptus-fonts/gdouros-aegyptus-fonts.spec

https://alexpl.fedorapeople.org/packages/fonts/gdouros/gdouros-aegyptus-fonts/gdouros-aegyptus-fonts-5.03-0.2.20150430.fc21.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1208833] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs

2015-04-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833



--- Comment #7 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #4)
 (In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #2)
  1) Please package per family only and corresponding fontconfig file for that
  font. Drop Nilus* and Gardiner* files, references from spec file. You may
  want to submit them as separate packages.
 
 Is there a way to let users know that they might be interested in the other
 two (not yet created) packages, that works regardless of whether they
 install packages from the terminal or with a graphical package manager?

Only I think on this is to modify %description and add a line where you can say
other fonts provided by this font developer are pkg1, pkg2

But this is really not needed as one can search fonts and their package summary
will appear when they do like this
dnf search gdourus

Or you can write a blog and feed it to planet.fedoraproject.org and also google
can then show your blog entry in google search.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1208833] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs

2015-04-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833



--- Comment #8 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #5)
 (In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #4)
  Is there a way to let users know that they might be interested in the other
  two (not yet created) packages, that works regardless of whether they
  install packages from the terminal or with a graphical package manager?
 
 I asked Richard Hughes about that and he suggested that I create a meta-font
 that references 3 packages. I'll look into that right after I have updated
 all of the spec files and srpms.

We package per family fonts. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming page. So all other
fonts need to be packaged as separate fonts and they will provide their own
metainfo file. Just check all those 3 fonts have no common family name all are
different.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1208833] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs

2015-04-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833

Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||panem...@gmail.com
   See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
   ||/show_bug.cgi?id=530190
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com
Summary|Review Request: |Re-Review Request:
   |gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A  |gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A
   |font for Egyptian   |font for Egyptian
   |hieroglyphs |hieroglyphs
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
Review:

+ mock build is successful for F23 (x86_64)

+ rpmlint on generated rpms gave output
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

+ Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum)
srpm Source0: 64eeb840084a512779e2f0ad08e8d670346c3bafe5d81bddac8ba8c69376d527
upstream Source0 :
64eeb840084a512779e2f0ad08e8d670346c3bafe5d81bddac8ba8c69376d527
srpm Source3 : 927600d70b45568b2f23e677a3e7a6a29f948bc10134b33305cde9639e845604
upstream Source3 :
927600d70b45568b2f23e677a3e7a6a29f948bc10134b33305cde9639e845604

+ License is Public Domain as per given on upstream website Fonts and
documents in this site are not pieces of property or merchandise items; they
carry no trademark, copyright, license or other market tags; they are free for
any use. So no license text is included in font file or any text file

+ follows fonts packaging guidelines.

+ fontconfig file is present at priority 65.

+ Appdata metainfo file is present.


Suggestions:
1) Please package per family only and corresponding fontconfig file for that
font. Drop Nilus* and Gardiner* files, references from spec file. You may want
to submit them as separate packages. 

Provide new updated srpm which contains only aegyptus fonts.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review