[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|php-composer-spdx-licenses- |php-composer-spdx-licenses- |1.1.0-2.fc22|1.1.0-2.el7 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-composer-spdx-licenses-1.1.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|php-composer-spdx-licenses- |php-composer-spdx-licenses- |1.1.0-2.fc21|1.1.0-2.fc22 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-composer-spdx-licenses-1.1.0-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||php-composer-spdx-licenses- ||1.1.0-2.fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-08-07 09:06:42 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-composer-spdx-licenses-1.1.0-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-composer-spdx-licenses-1.1.0-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-composer-spdx-licenses-1.1.0-2.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-composer-spdx-licenses-1.1.0-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-composer-spdx-licenses-1.1.0-2.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-composer-spdx-licenses-1.1.0-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-composer-spdx-licenses-1.1.0-2.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-composer-spdx-licenses-1.1.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shawn.iwin...@gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- @Shawn, would you have a few minutes for a quick formal review (as the informal already done most of the work). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 --- Comment #10 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- (In reply to Remi Collet from comment #1) No urgency... until https://github.com/composer/composer/pull/4264 is merged... PR 4264 is merged. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|shawn.iwin...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 --- Comment #12 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 1054353 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1054353action=edit phpcompatinfo-full.log phpCompatInfo version 4.3.0 DB built Jun 16 2015 12:31:49 CEST -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 --- Comment #13 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 1054354 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1054354action=edit phpcompatinfo-src.log phpCompatInfo version 4.3.0 DB built Jun 16 2015 12:31:49 CEST -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 --- Comment #14 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 1054355 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1054355action=edit fedora-review.txt Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1244102 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, PHP, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #15 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
[!]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
[!]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
Note: %defattr present but not needed
[!]: Buildroot is not present
Note: Buildroot: present but not needed
[!]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: %clean present but not required
As usual, remove EPEL 5 bits after initial import.
No blockers.
= APPROVED =
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- @Shawn great thanks, this was really fast :) New Package SCM Request === Package Name: php-composer-spdx-licenses Short Description: SPDX licenses list and validation library Upstream URL: https://github.com/composer/spdx-licenses Owners: remi Branches: f21 f22 f23 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102
--- Comment #5 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %license.
Note: License file CHANGELOG.md is marked as %doc instead of %license
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: Unknown or generated. 4 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/gani/1244102-php-composer-spdx-
licenses/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
/usr/share/php/Composer(composer)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[ ]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
Note: %defattr present but not needed
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 4 files.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[ ]: Buildroot is not present
Note: Buildroot: present but not needed
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: %clean present but not required
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 --- Comment #7 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- Thanks for this notice. It is comment generated automatically by fedora-review tool. I have no idea about it either why this comment occured. I pasted it as part of entire generated form. I will try to look on this issue deeper. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- (In reply to Marcin Haba from comment #5) Issues: === - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Note: License file CHANGELOG.md is marked as %doc instead of %license See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text I don't understand this comment. %license LICENSE %doc *.md -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 --- Comment #8 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- Hello, It looks that the source of this issue is here: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/generic.py Here is grabbing all potential licenses files: for potentialfile in ['COPYING', 'LICEN', 'copying', 'licen']: pattern = '*' + potentialfile + '*' [if 'COPYING', 'LICEN', 'copying' or 'licen' found in paths from rpm content then add the file to licenses list (licenses variable) and next the license files are checked if exists in docs files list: for _license in licenses: if _license in docs: [test fail due to found license file is in docs The problem here is in line 791 generic.py: pattern = '*' + potentialfile + '*' and in consequence in 793 generic.py: licenses = filter(lambda l: not self.rpms.find(l + '/*'), licenses)file because pattern here is find(l + '/*') Your package name contains in name keyword licenses - php-composer-spdx-licenses and from this reason it finish with test fail. I will propose to fedora-review author change the patterm from: pattern = '*' + potentialfile + '*' to: pattern = '*/' + potentialfile + '*' Then this test case be search on files only, not paths. I checked this change with your package and fedora-review. It works for me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 --- Comment #9 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- Hello, Just I notified fedora-review authors about issue from this feature request. https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/ticket/264 I also prepared a bit better patch that this above and I attached patch to ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- 1/ 2/ explained in comment = upstream doesn't provide any useful archive. 3/ not needed but not forbiden (I usually clean EL-5 stuff after inital import) 4/ yes, snapshot 5/ good catch, fixed Spec: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/remicollet/remirepo/2b0562f4427714414e2be3e0b9a778a9e090dfff/php/php-composer-spdx-licenses/php-composer-spdx-licenses.spec Srpm: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-composer-spdx-licenses-1.1.0-2.remi.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102
Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marcin.h...@bacula.pl
--- Comment #3 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl ---
Hello,
I am not Fedora packages maintainer, so my review is informal.
I have five following points about your Spec and package:
1) Source0 should be URL available to download, not
%{name}-%{version}-%{gh_short}.tgz
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL?rd=Packaging/SourceURL#Referencing_Source
2) URL value is not possible to open from Spec file due to macros used. I am
not sure if here are allowed macros.
URL: The full URL for more information about the program
from:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#SPEC_file_overview
I would ask somebody else for confirm or nagate this point.
3) The %clean section is not required for F-13 and above.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean
4) In Spec comment:
# git snashop to get upstream test suite
What is it snashop? Do you mean snapshot?
5) rpmlint shows on RPM:
php-composer-spdx-licenses.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/php/Composer/Spdx/autoload.php
php-composer-spdx-licenses.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/php/Composer/Spdx/SpdxLicenses.php
The two scripts have executable permissions. When you unset executable
permission on these files then should be OK.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||composer/spdx-licenses -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- No urgency... until https://github.com/composer/composer/pull/4264 is merged... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244102] Review Request: php-composer-spdx-licenses - SPDX licenses list and validation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- Update: https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/8162d32cbf9e0470aa078d252c2487c9eab125f8 Spec: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/remicollet/remirepo/8162d32cbf9e0470aa078d252c2487c9eab125f8/php/php-composer-spdx-licenses/php-composer-spdx-licenses.spec Srpm: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-composer-spdx-licenses-1.1.0-1.remi.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
