[Bug 1703382] Review Request: libetnaviv - Vivante GPU user-space driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703382 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2019-06-25 07:30:37 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1703382] Review Request: libetnaviv - Vivante GPU user-space driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703382 --- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libetnaviv -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1703382] Review Request: libetnaviv - Vivante GPU user-space driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703382 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zbys...@in.waw.pl Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Use %autosetup in build? Should the .pc file be also included? Should the package be called -headers or -devel? + package name is acceptable + license is acceptable for Fedora (MIT) + license is specified correctly + builds and installs OK + BR/R/P look OK Package is APPROVED. I think this looks OK, so I'll set the flag, but is the package really needed? Maybe it'd be easier and simpler and more effiecient to just copy those few files into the xorg-x11-drv-armada package? Are any other users likely? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1703382] Review Request: libetnaviv - Vivante GPU user-space driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703382 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1703386 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel --- Note that this package doesn't actually build the libetnaviv driver (see %build comment). Its sole purpose is to ship the headers so that xorg-x11-drv-armada (bug #1703386) can generate the command stream. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703386 [Bug 1703386] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-armada - X.org graphics driver for KMS based systems with pluggable GPU backend -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org