[Bug 1874058] Review Request: logiops - Unofficial driver for Logitech mice and keyboard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874058 Nicolas De Amicis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2020-09-02 10:10:15 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1874058] Review Request: logiops - Unofficial driver for Logitech mice and keyboard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874058 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/logiops -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1874058] Review Request: logiops - Unofficial driver for Logitech mice and keyboard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874058
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Don't mix tabs and spaces:
logiops.src:7: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 7)
There a tab after the URL: field.
Package approved, please fix the issue before import.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License v3.0 or
later". 10 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck
in /home/bob/packaging/review/logiops/review-logiops/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: systemd_post is invoked in %post, systemd_preun in %preun, and
systemd_postun in %postun for Systemd service files.
Note: Systemd service file(s) in logiops
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does
[Bug 1874058] Review Request: logiops - Unofficial driver for Logitech mice and keyboard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874058 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas De Amicis --- Thanks Robert-André, I modified the spec file as requested. Could you review again :-) ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1874058] Review Request: logiops - Unofficial driver for Logitech mice and keyboard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874058
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- BR systemd-rpm-macros
- %{_exec_prefix}/lib/systemd/system/logid.service → %{_unitdir}/logid.service
- Add the systemd scriptlets. See
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/#_systemd
%post
%systemd_post logid.service
%preun
%systemd_preun logid.service
%postun
%systemd_postun_with_restart logid.service
- License: GPL v3 → License: GPLv3
- %{cmake} call should be at the beginning of %build, not in %prep
- Use a more specific name for your archive. Also we usually work with tar.gz
in Linux
Source0: https://github.com/PixlOne/logiops/archive/v%{version}.zip
→
Source0:
https://github.com/PixlOne/logiops/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
- Please add your email to your changelog entry:
* Mon Aug 31 2020 Nicolas De Amicis - 0.2.2-1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1874058] Review Request: logiops - Unofficial driver for Logitech mice and keyboard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874058 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas De Amicis --- Thanks for the review. I made the changes. Could you please review the package again? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1874058] Review Request: logiops - Unofficial driver for Logitech mice and keyboard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874058
Artur Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment #1 from Artur Iwicki ---
>%global logiops %{name}
What's this for?
>Source0: https://github.com/PixlOne/logiops/archive/6d7d91c.zip
The project seems to mark releases with git tags. You can fetch a specific tag
from GitHub. Switch the Source URL to:
https://github.com/PixlOne/logiops/archive/%{version}/logiops-%{version}.zip
>ExclusiveArch: x86_64
Why? I took a brief peek at the GitHub repo and didn't see anything saying that
it won't work on other architectures.
>%global debug_package %{nil}
This is generally a red flag. We want debuginfo in Fedora packages. Remove
this.
>mkdir build
>cd build
>cmake ..
Use the %{cmake} macro instead. It will handle setting up CXXFLAGS (which
should enable debuginfo generation) and also create the build directory
("%{__cmake_builddir}").
>cd build
>make
Use %{cmake_build} instead.
>install -d -m 755 %{buildroot}%{_bindir}
>cp -a build/logid %{buildroot}%{_bindir}
>install -d -m 755 %{buildroot}%{_exec_prefix}/lib/systemd/system/
>cp -a build/logid.service %{buildroot}%{_exec_prefix}/lib/systemd/system/
Try using %{cmake_install} instead?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
