[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #99 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-23 13:48:04 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 690282 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 Bug 439630 depends on bug 572512, which changed state. Bug 572512 Summary: Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572512 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #98 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-03-11 07:41:46 EST --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 572515 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||572512 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #97 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-03-10 16:06:40 EST --- I guess is time to reopen this review (and for gluegen too). Should I create a new one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #96 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-03-09 18:23:42 EST --- (In reply to comment #91) > jogl.i686: W: no-documentation > jogl-debuginfo.i686: E: debuginfo-without-sources It seems that this error can be ignored https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563001 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #95 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-03-09 18:17:09 EST --- (In reply to comment #93) > rpmlint -a | grep "debuginfo-without-sources" > > returns nothing (and I do have quite a number of debuginfo packages > installed), > so I suspect that one is a problem. Should it be the same case? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545039#c9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630
--- Comment #94 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior
2010-03-09 18:06:26 EST ---
(In reply to comment #92)
> rm -rf %{buildroot} (in install)
I put this because of a rpmlint error: jogl.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot
%install
> don't use -p in install param
>
> if you use
> mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_javadir}
> why use a few lines later
> install -dm 755 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/%{name}
> some place use install some place use cp...
> try to be consequent.
I have some recycled code here.
> don't use "\" line break so much. a 80 chars long lines is not too long, so
> most lines shouldn't have to break.
Just for aesthetic reasons, or is there any consequences for rpm's generation?
(In reply to comment #93)
> rpmlint -a | grep "debuginfo-without-sources"
>
> returns nothing (and I do have quite a number of debuginfo packages
> installed),
> so I suspect that one is a problem.
Thank you so much, James, I guess that is time to some googleing and ask for
help in the lists.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #93 from James Heather 2010-03-09 17:26:43 EST --- Is the no-documentation problematic? Obviously the javadoc is in a separate package, but maybe you are supposed to put in a README? Not sure. I have run rpmlint -a | grep no-doc and it did seem that there were quite a lot of installed packages on my machine that have that warning, so you're in good company. You'd think that an error would be a fatal problem, wouldn't you? Well, rpmlint -a | grep " E: " returns plenty of stuff. But rpmlint -a | grep "debuginfo-without-sources" returns nothing (and I do have quite a number of debuginfo packages installed), so I suspect that one is a problem. James -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630
--- Comment #92 from Levente Farkas 2010-03-09 17:12:58
EST ---
not required:
cd ..
rm -rf %{buildroot} (in install)
don't use -p in install param
if you use
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_javadir}
why use a few lines later
install -dm 755 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/%{name}
some place use install some place use cp...
try to be consequent.
don't use "\" line break so much. a 80 chars long lines is not too long, so
most lines shouldn't have to break.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #91 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-03-09 16:41:42 EST --- Here is an update: spec: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/jogl/1.1.1/4/jogl.spec srpm: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/jogl/1.1.1/4/jogl-1.1.1-4.fc12.src.rpm rpmlint is a bit more happy: [lon...@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i686/jogl-* jogl.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Microsystems -> Micro systems, Micro-systems, Ecosystems jogl.i686: W: no-documentation jogl-debuginfo.i686: E: debuginfo-without-sources 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. (In reply to comment #87) > About the debuginfo without sources, I am not familiar with fedora but I am > pretty sure you should copy the native source (C) into a dedicated package > into > a directory where gdb can find them. It is a mystery to me too, Sylvestre -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #90 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-03-09 16:32:47 EST --- Absolutely right. It should be /usr/lib64/jogl (my fault). I'm uploading a fix right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 Stephen R. Saucier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ssau...@umbc.edu --- Comment #89 from Stephen R. Saucier 2010-03-09 16:23:35 EST --- Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior: rpm -q --filesbypkg jogl jogl /usr/lib64jogl/libjogl.so jogl /usr/lib64jogl/libjogl_awt.so jogl /usr/share/java/jogl-1.1.1.jar jogl /usr/share/java/jogl.jar Granted, I have no idea what I am talking about, however: that /usr/lib64jogl/ seems suspect to me, shouldn't that be /usr/lib64/java? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630
--- Comment #88 from James Heather 2010-03-09 13:42:01
EST ---
(In reply to comment #86)
> jogl.i686: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libjogl_awt.so
> jogl.i686: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libjogl.so
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Packaging_JAR_files_that_use_JNI
Looks like the .so files need to go into %{_libdir}/%{name}. I suspect that
will get rid of the warning; but it needs doing either way.
Good work--this looks like it's coming along nicely.
James
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #87 from Sylvestre Ledru 2010-03-09 13:24:11 EST --- I don't think the soname missing is really an issue since .so should never be called directly. Only called through Java. About the debuginfo without sources, I am not familiar with fedora but I am pretty sure you should copy the native source (C) into a dedicated package into a directory where gdb can find them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #86 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-03-09 12:52:01 EST --- Solved. I'm able to build now: spec: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/jogl/1.1.1/3/jogl.spec srpm: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/jogl/1.1.1/3/jogl-1.1.1-3.fc12.src.rpm rpmlint has 5 complains: [lon...@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i686/jogl-* jogl.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Microsystems -> Micro systems, Micro-systems, Ecosystems jogl.i686: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libjogl_awt.so jogl.i686: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libjogl.so jogl.i686: W: no-documentation jogl-debuginfo.i686: E: debuginfo-without-sources 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. I guess we should ignore this "jogl.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Microsystems -> Micro systems, Micro-systems, Ecosystems" end this "jogl.i686: W: no-documentation", but I don't know hot to fix the others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #85 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-03-09 11:23:42 EST --- Created an attachment (id=398837) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=398837) patch to correctly point build.xml This is a patch to correctly point build.xml -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #84 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-03-09 11:14:01 EST --- Hi, sorry for the delay, but I'm a little sick this days. As you can see, I've updated gluegen to build a package named gluegen-source. By doing this, I'm, now, able to build jogl without gluegen side by side and my spec now BuildRequires: gluegen-source. I've made a patch to point my build.xml to the correc (and new) location of gluegen. Despite the fact that my local copy of jogl builds ok, I'm having problems with my rpmbuild version: BUILD FAILED /home/lonely/rpmbuild/BUILD/jogl/make/build.xml:1562: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/lonely/rpmbuild/BUILD/jogl/make/build.xml:487: The following error occurred while executing this line: /usr/share/gluegen-source/gluegen/make/build.xml:458: The following error occurred while executing this line: /usr/share/gluegen-source/gluegen/make/build.xml:378: The following error occurred while executing this line: /usr/share/gluegen-source/gluegen/make/gluegen-cpptasks.xml:394: Problem: failed to create task or type compiler Cause: The name is undefined. Action: Check the spelling. Action: Check that any custom tasks/types have been declared. Action: Check that any / declarations have taken place. Total time: 4 seconds erro: Status de saída de /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.lV0Zq0 inválido (%build) That is weird... one version builds and another not. spec: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/jogl/1.1.1/2/jogl.spec srpm: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/jogl/1.1.1/2/fix-buildxml.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #83 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-03-01 21:26:49 EST --- I guess we have some precedent cases. The discussion can be found here: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-February/131665.html So, I'll continue this package with BuildRequires: gluegen-source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #82 from Sylvestre Ledru 2010-03-01 16:01:53 EST --- FYI, in Debian/Ubuntu, for the past 2 or 3 years, I am packaging JOGL and Gluegen as a single package. There is not much libraries using Gluegen and, for now, nobody complained about the fact that JOGL and Gluegen are provided into the same package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #81 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-03-01 10:18:30 EST --- [lon...@localhost jogl-1.1.1a-src]$ patch -p0 < uncouple-gluegen.patch patching file jogl/make/build.xml Hunk #1 succeeded at 131 (offset 4 lines). [lon...@localhost make]$ ant Buildfile: build.xml BUILD FAILED /home/lonely/rpmbuild/SOURCES/jogl-1.1.1a-src/jogl/make/build.xml:62: Cannot find ../../gluegen/make/gluegen-cpptasks.xml imported from /home/lonely/rpmbuild/SOURCES/jogl-1.1.1a-src/jogl/make/build.xml Total time: 0 seconds I was looking at the source and skip this "searching gluegen's code" may be too much work, but if we provide the gluegen-source as Hans have suggested it it relatively easy to declare another gluegen root. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #80 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-02-28 21:53:26 EST --- Thank you. This is quite different from the patch that found previously. I'll give it a try. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #79 from Chen Lei 2010-02-28 21:19:37 EST --- Created an attachment (id=396941) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=396941) gentoo' patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #78 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-02-28 17:52:08 EST --- Yes, I've seen opensuse's mandriva's and gentoo's way. This question seems to be more philosophical than technical. So I decided to send the e-mail asking for guidance to the lists. It seems to me that the work will be stuck until they decide on the better way, so I think I'll do ALL the ways and wait the decision. =) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #77 from James Heather 2010-02-28 17:35:50 EST --- BTW this is good and important work--it will be really good to get JOGL into Fedora. That's true especially if it means Scilab too, but JOGL is also important in its own right, for Java development. I presume you've seen the SUSE JOGL stuff at http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/3/srodzaj/1/search/jogl ? The OpenSUSE RPMs install just fine on F12, so they're obviously doing something right... the source RPMs won't compile on Fedora, though. But there might be some good clues in there. They seem to be building jogl and gluegen in the same spec file. James -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #76 from James Heather 2010-02-28 17:27:45 EST --- I'm not really following this. If gluegen and jogl are separate projects but jogl needs the gluegen project to compile, does that not mean it makes sense to do this as a single spec file? I don't understand the motivation for splitting into two, if one needs the source of the other to compile. That to me sounds like effectively a single project, regardless of whether it's split into two projects upstream. Am I missing something? James -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #75 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-02-28 11:29:44 EST --- (In reply to comment #73) > Haven't you tried using uncouple-gluegen.patch from gentoo? Could you, please, take a look at the patch? As I can see it is doing nothing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630
--- Comment #74 from Chen Lei 2010-02-28 10:50:01 EST ---
Also
%{_javadir}/*.jar
%attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libjogl.so
%attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libjogl_awt.so
must changed to %{_libdir}/%{name}/*.jar
%{_libdir}/%{name}/*.so
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #73 from Chen Lei 2010-02-28 10:48:34 EST --- Haven't you tried using uncouple-gluegen.patch from gentoo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #72 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-02-28 08:33:02 EST --- It will be a great loss to Fedora if Scilab remains outside of our repos (since JOGL is a dependency of it) because this is probably the best software available for simulation and modeling. Particularly I would not see a great problem in bringing the source code of gluegen with JOGL because the gluegen's code follows the requirements of not using precompiled jars and is deleted immediately after the stage where JOGL finish to get the information it needs. I'm not familiar with the procedures of RPMFusion, but I think it might be a good alternative if this package could move to there if it is not acceptable in our official repos. If this is our only alternative, Sclab will need to be moved as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #71 from Chen Lei 2010-02-28 04:25:06 EST --- (In reply to comment #68) > (In reply to comment #67) > > You need patch build.xml, it's easy to do say. > I know that the ideal is to build JOGL without using this gluegen source, but, > as I can see, even the gentoo guys didn't make it. > I'm not an experienced programmer and, maybe, this is just one thing that is > beyond my skills. Use this source looks mandatory because to build JOGL > without > it may need to rewrite great amounts of code. I think this will let package unproved. You may need someone for help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #70 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-02-27 19:46:46 EST --- I'll probably need some help with this no-soname issue. Ideas, guys? (In reply to comment #69) > Does that not suggest that it would be better off as a single spec file that > builds both gluegen and jogl? I am not sure what the motivation is for > splitting into two packages if the gluegen source is needed to build both of > them. > > James Build both from the same source was my first idea, but since they are different projects, maybe, provide a separated gluegen is the best practice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #69 from James Heather 2010-02-27 12:16:48 EST --- Does that not suggest that it would be better off as a single spec file that builds both gluegen and jogl? I am not sure what the motivation is for splitting into two packages if the gluegen source is needed to build both of them. James -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #68 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-02-26 22:24:18 EST --- (In reply to comment #67) > You need patch build.xml, it's easy to do say. I know that the ideal is to build JOGL without using this gluegen source, but, as I can see, even the gentoo guys didn't make it. I'm not an experienced programmer and, maybe, this is just one thing that is beyond my skills. Use this source looks mandatory because to build JOGL without it may need to rewrite great amounts of code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #67 from Chen Lei 2010-02-26 21:47:00 EST --- (In reply to comment #66) > (In reply to comment #64) > > I wonder that "Source2: gluegen-1.0.20102502svn.tar.gz" is not needed. > As described here[1] JOGL relies on gluegen's source tree: "Check out the > GlueGen source tree: > JOGL relies on the GlueGen project to autogenerate most of the Java and JNI > code for the OpenGL interface. The jogl/ and gluegen/ workspaces must be > side-by-side in order for JOGL to build properly." > So, it is not enough to have gluegen packaged in order to build JOGL, we'll > need gluegen's source in the first stage. > Here goes the error message: > [lon...@localhost make]$ ant > Buildfile: build.xml > > BUILD FAILED > /home/lonely/jogl/jogl/make/build.xml:62: Cannot find > ../../gluegen/make/gluegen-cpptasks.xml imported from > /home/lonely/jogl/jogl/make/build.xml > You need patch build.xml, it's easy to do say. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #66 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-02-26 15:42:13 EST --- (In reply to comment #64) > I wonder that "Source2: gluegen-1.0.20102502svn.tar.gz" is not needed. As described here[1] JOGL relies on gluegen's source tree: "Check out the GlueGen source tree: JOGL relies on the GlueGen project to autogenerate most of the Java and JNI code for the OpenGL interface. The jogl/ and gluegen/ workspaces must be side-by-side in order for JOGL to build properly." So, it is not enough to have gluegen packaged in order to build JOGL, we'll need gluegen's source in the first stage. Here goes the error message: [lon...@localhost make]$ ant Buildfile: build.xml BUILD FAILED /home/lonely/jogl/jogl/make/build.xml:62: Cannot find ../../gluegen/make/gluegen-cpptasks.xml imported from /home/lonely/jogl/jogl/make/build.xml (In reply to comment #65) > Do you really need the %post section? It seems odd. It looks as though the "ln > -s" in the %install, and the %ghost line in %files, should be enough to create > the symlink without needing to rm and ln -s in %post. You are completely right, I didn't noticed it. > restorecon -v $(rpm -ql jogl jogl-javadoc jogl-manual) restorecon returns nothing: restorecon -v $(rpm -ql jogl jogl-javadoc jogl-manual) [lon...@localhost ~]$ restorecon -v $(rpm -ql jogl jogl-javadoc jogl-manual) [lon...@localhost ~]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #65 from James Heather 2010-02-26 08:19:12 EST --- Do you really need the %post section? It seems odd. It looks as though the "ln -s" in the %install, and the %ghost line in %files, should be enough to create the symlink without needing to rm and ln -s in %post. Do you need to use restorecon to set the selinux contexts, by the way? I've noticed that in some spec files before. But maybe it all happens automatically. Might be worth installing the rpm, and then trying restorecon -v $(rpm -ql jogl jogl-javadoc jogl-manual) If it tells you it's changing anything, that probably means you need to use restorecon in %post. James -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #64 from Chen Lei 2010-02-26 07:38:37 EST --- I wonder that "Source2: gluegen-1.0.20102502svn.tar.gz" is not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630
--- Comment #63 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior
2010-02-26 07:29:33 EST ---
SPEC: http://lonelyspooky.com/uploads/SRPMs/jogj/1.1.1-2/jogl.spec
SRPM:
http://lonelyspooky.com/uploads/SRPMs/jogj/1.1.1-2/jogl-1.1.1-2.fc11.src.rpm
rpmlint is a bit more happy now:
[virt...@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i586/jogl*
jogl.i586: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libjogl_awt.so
jogl.i586: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libjogl_awt.so
jogl.i586: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libjogl.so
jogl.i586: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libjogl.so
jogl.i586: W: no-documentation
jogl-debuginfo.i586: E: empty-debuginfo-package
jogl-javadoc.i586: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings.
[virt...@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/jogl-1.1.1-2.fc11.src.rpm
jogl.src:75: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build rm -rf %{buildroot}
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #62 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-02-26 05:34:55 EST --- Thanks, James. Soon I post an update here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630
--- Comment #61 from James Heather 2010-02-26 05:28:01
EST ---
In fact, I think it's normal to start the %install section with
%install
rm -rf %{buildroot}
That would make rpmlint happier, and also solve your problem. At the moment,
you'll hit this issue if the previous build failed, because %clean won't get
executed, and the next build will get confused because of the existing files.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #60 from James Heather 2010-02-26 05:25:21 EST --- (In reply to comment #59) > Yes, it is normal when you try to build in a dirt > /home/Sylvestre/rpmbuild/BUILD (from previous attempts). When Koji builds the > packages it uses always a clean directory, but I can solve this because it is > annoying. I suspect this is related to the rpmlint warning: jogl.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install Is this something to with not having an %install section? I am not quite sure what's going on there. I expected to see an %install but there isn't one. Maybe the %clean isn't being fired for some reason. That ought to be getting rid of the previous build attempts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #59 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-02-26 05:12:49 EST --- Yes, it is normal when you try to build in a dirt /home/Sylvestre/rpmbuild/BUILD (from previous attempts). When Koji builds the packages it uses always a clean directory, but I can solve this because it is annoying. Maybe Chen Lei could guide me through this rpmlint issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #58 from Sylvestre Ledru 2010-02-26 03:50:10 EST --- Well done! I think you already know but when I tried 'rpmbuild -bb jogl.spec', I get: + /usr/bin/unzip -qq /home/Sylvestre/rpmbuild/SOURCES/jogl-1.1.1a-src.zip replace gluegen/doc/manual/index.html? [y]es, [n]o, [A]ll, [N]one, [r]ename: It is normal ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630
--- Comment #57 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior
2010-02-25 21:59:41 EST ---
Here is my first build.
I do not want to go to bed without posting it. Please, keep in mind that it is
a draft.
SPEC: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/jogl/1.1.1/1/jogl.spec
SRPM: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/jogl/1.1.1/1/jogl-1.1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm
rpmlint:
[lon...@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/jogl-1.1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm
jogl.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Microsystems -> Micro
systems, Micro-systems, Ecosystems
jogl.src:75: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build rm -rf %{buildroot}
jogl.src:78: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_javadir}
jogl.src:80: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build
%{buildroot}%{_javadir}/%{name}-%{version}.jar
jogl.src:81: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build pushd %{buildroot}%{_javadir}
jogl.src:88: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build install -dm 755
%{buildroot}%{_libdir}
jogl.src:90: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build %{buildroot}%{_libdir}
jogl.src:93: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build install -dm 755
%{buildroot}%{_javadocdir}/%{name}-%{version}
jogl.src:95: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build
%{buildroot}%{_javadocdir}/%{name}-%{version}
jogl.src:96: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build ln -s %{name}-%{version}
%{buildroot}%{_javadocdir}/%{name} # ghost symlink
jogl.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
jogl.src: W: no-%install-section
jogl.src: W: invalid-url Source2: gluegen-1.0.20102502svn.tar.gz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 13 warnings.
[lon...@localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i686/jogl*
jogl.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Microsystems -> Micro
systems, Micro-systems, Ecosystems
jogl.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libjogl_awt.so
jogl.i686: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libjogl_awt.so
jogl.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libjogl.so
jogl.i686: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libjogl.so
jogl.i686: W: no-documentation
jogl-javadoc.i686: W: non-standard-group Development/Java
jogl-javadoc.i686: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm
jogl-manual.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) documetation ->
documentation, documentary, documented
jogl-manual.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Usermanual -> User
manual, User-manual, Wassermann
jogl-manual.i686: W: non-standard-group Development/Java
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #56 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-02-25 19:09:05 EST --- Have just updated gluegen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 If gluegen is OK we're almost there. =) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #55 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-02-25 13:34:06 EST --- Found it: svn checkout https://gluegen.dev.java.net/svn/gluegen/tags/1.0b06a gluegen --username user Just a few more fixes and I post here a draft. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #54 from Chen Lei 2010-02-23 23:08:44 EST --- (In reply to comment #52) > (In reply to comment #51) > > > Are you going to have a separate jogl-javadoc package, by the way, or will > > that > > come as part of the jogl package? > I'm going to build a separated javadock package. > We already have this functional gluegen package: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627#c35 but the main problem > with JOGL is that it needs a side by side copy of gluegen to build his > build.xml. The doubt here is if we can use this bundled gluegen in this > initial > step and discard it. It's definitely not. You must using a git or svn version of gluegen. Maybe you need wrote some patches for gluegen to let jogl 1.1.1a build success with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #53 from Chen Lei 2010-02-23 23:05:00 EST --- (In reply to comment #51) > > Normally we should build jogl against the system-wide copy of gluegen > > In other words, against the one we've just built? > > So package gluegen: > > Requires: jogl > > and package jogl: > > Requires: gluegen > BuildRequires: jogl > > Are you going to have a separate jogl-javadoc package, by the way, or will > that > come as part of the jogl package? > > Really glad to see progress on this! > > James gluegen not depends on jogl, we need to build a gluegen which can works fine with jogl 1.1.1a. We need find a svn or git version gluegen source which has the same codes compared to the bundled gluegen in jogl or find a version which is compatible with jogl 1.1.1a. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #52 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-02-22 07:03:42 EST --- (In reply to comment #51) > Are you going to have a separate jogl-javadoc package, by the way, or will > that > come as part of the jogl package? I'm going to build a separated javadock package. We already have this functional gluegen package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627#c35 but the main problem with JOGL is that it needs a side by side copy of gluegen to build his build.xml. The doubt here is if we can use this bundled gluegen in this initial step and discard it. This bundled gluegen and our packaged gluegen will be the same. Use the bundled gluegen only means that the package can be done without major hacking in JOGL (which, incidentally, are out of my ability). Maybe it becames clearer if I post here one draft. I'm working on it. =) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #51 from James Heather 2010-02-22 02:35:17 EST --- > Normally we should build jogl against the system-wide copy of gluegen In other words, against the one we've just built? So package gluegen: Requires: jogl and package jogl: Requires: gluegen BuildRequires: jogl Are you going to have a separate jogl-javadoc package, by the way, or will that come as part of the jogl package? Really glad to see progress on this! James -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #50 from Chen Lei 2010-02-22 02:05:01 EST --- Normally we should build jogl against the system-wide copy of gluegen, that is to say we must del the code of gluegen in %prep section. %prep %setup -q %patch0 -p1 %patch1 -p1 #remove bundled gluegen rm -rf (bundled gluegen) Regards, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #49 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-02-21 18:21:51 EST --- Hi, after a little work this weekend I've made some progress with this package, but, to be honest, I'm a little confused about this "gentoo way" to uncouple JOGL/gluegen. This patch do not make much sense to me[1] and looking after the ebuild code[2] I have a impression that the gentoo guys are doing almost the same that we are doing. What I have in mind is to build a separated gluegen package, but continue to use this gluegen that cames with JOGL source to build it, then, after JOGL is done, we can simply rm this gluegen codes. Since both, JOGL and his gluegen are compiled from source, this can be one easy way to get the package ready. [1] - http://gentoo-overlays.zugaina.org/java-overlay/portage/dev-java/jogl/files/1.1.0/uncouple-gluegen.patch [2] - http://gentoo-overlays.zugaina.org/java-overlay/portage/dev-java/jogl/jogl-1.1.1.ebuild -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 James Heather changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j.heat...@surrey.ac.uk --- Comment #48 from James Heather 2010-02-01 11:17:03 EST --- I am very glad to hear about this! I use JOGL/gluegen a lot for my OpenGL teaching, and it would be fantastic to have it in Fedora. When it turns up, could we please have an F12 build of the JOGL stuff as well as rawhide? Looking forward to it. James -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #47 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2010-01-31 10:10:45 EST --- Hello, I will, then, continue to try to package JOGL/gluegen to make scilab possible in Fedora. Although not much experienced, I believe that with some help it will be possible. I travel now, in February 3 and return on February 9, but I'll try to leave at least an early draft. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #46 from Sylvestre Ledru 2010-01-29 03:13:52 EST --- OK, thanks. I just sent an email to Henrique about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #45 from Chen Lei 2010-01-29 00:39:36 EST --- Sylvestre， I think Henrique may be helpful to package gluegen and jogl. Try to contact him and let him known what gentoo is doing. http://gpo.zugaina.org/dev-java/jogl/ChangeLog and http://gpo.zugaina.org/dev-java/gluegen/ChangeLog (while Debian is not. Debian uses the one provided in jogl tarballs) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #44 from Sylvestre Ledru 2010-01-28 15:39:08 EST --- Well, I am not a Fedora contributor neither a user... Do you think someone can handle this for me ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #43 from Chen Lei 2010-01-28 14:43:00 EST --- You can follow the instruction below. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Create_Your_Review_Request You need to edit the Review Summary and upload the srpm. The "Review Request" for jogl and gluegen should be two separate bugzilla reports. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #42 from Sylvestre Ledru 2010-01-28 14:30:13 EST --- What about ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559623 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #41 from Chen Lei 2010-01-28 14:08:38 EST --- (In reply to comment #40) > Yes, gentoo is doing it: > http://gpo.zugaina.org/dev-java/jogl/ChangeLog > and > http://gpo.zugaina.org/dev-java/gluegen/ChangeLog > (while Debian is not. Debian uses the one provided in jogl tarballs) Since the original "Review Request" for gluegen and jogl aren closed, you or someone should create new "Review Request" for those two. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join The closed "Review Request" can't be seen by fedora package sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #40 from Sylvestre Ledru 2010-01-28 13:46:10 EST --- Yes, gentoo is doing it: http://gpo.zugaina.org/dev-java/jogl/ChangeLog and http://gpo.zugaina.org/dev-java/gluegen/ChangeLog (while Debian is not. Debian uses the one provided in jogl tarballs) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #39 from Chen Lei 2010-01-28 13:39:34 EST --- Do you mean gluegen should ship with jogl? Is this possible to build gluegen before build jogl using source from http://download.java.net/media/gluegen/builds/archive/ or from certain git revision? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #38 from Sylvestre Ledru 2010-01-28 13:25:18 EST --- gluegen (with jogl) has the same version. About the jing.jar and jimi.jar, I reported a bug upstream: http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6524 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #37 from Chen Lei 2010-01-28 13:14:42 EST --- (In reply to comment #36) > Well, I don't know which changelog you are talking about but the version jogl > 1.1 tarball has both gluegen and jogl together. > You can create separate packages of them without any problems. > If you are talking about jogl 2.0, it is still a dev version and there are > several problems with it: > * a lot of changes occurred in the API > * the last modifications on jogl git are three months old. > * there is not ETA on the release of a stable version (I tried a few time to > contact upstream about that and about contributing to jogl but I never > received > any answer) > For all these reasons, jogl 1.1 should be packaged first. If so, I think we can create a jogl1 package instead of jogl to push jogl 1.1 to the fedora repo like qt3 and qt(qt4). What is the version of gluegen that included in jogl 1.1 tarball? > About the prerequirements, I don't know any dependencies of Scilab using > jing.jar or jimi.jar ?! There is a Prerequirements to compile Scilab 5.2.0 from scilab's site. See http://www.scilab.org/download/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #36 from Sylvestre Ledru 2010-01-28 12:39:14 EST --- Well, I don't know which changelog you are talking about but the version jogl 1.1 tarball has both gluegen and jogl together. You can create separate packages of them without any problems. If you are talking about jogl 2.0, it is still a dev version and there are several problems with it: * a lot of changes occurred in the API * the last modifications on jogl git are three months old. * there is not ETA on the release of a stable version (I tried a few time to contact upstream about that and about contributing to jogl but I never received any answer) For all these reasons, jogl 1.1 should be packaged first. About the prerequirements, I don't know any dependencies of Scilab using jing.jar or jimi.jar ?! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #35 from Chen Lei 2010-01-28 12:25:35 EST --- (In reply to comment #34) > jogl, jgraphx, jhdf (see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/SciTech/Scilab > but > note that net-cdf-java & fits dependencies are far from mandatory) and > jlatexmath (http://forge.scilab.org/index.php/p/jlatexmath/) > Note only jogl is necessary for Scilab 5.1.1. > Anyway, I followed your comment and wrote bug #559623 Hi! Because Fedora is a "Breeding Edge" distrowatch, I think we should skip scilab 5.1.1 and begin to build scilab 5.2.0. I realized from the changelog of jogl that the GlueGen runtime classes have been removed from jogl.jar. I think we can pull the source directly from upstream's vcs and package jogl and GlueGen separately. Should all files in the prerequirements-scilab-5.2.0-src.tar.gz(such as jing.jar, jimi.jar, etc.) to be packaged before packaging scilab? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #34 from Sylvestre Ledru 2010-01-28 10:59:35 EST --- jogl, jgraphx, jhdf (see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/SciTech/Scilab but note that net-cdf-java & fits dependencies are far from mandatory) and jlatexmath (http://forge.scilab.org/index.php/p/jlatexmath/) Note only jogl is necessary for Scilab 5.1.1. Anyway, I followed your comment and wrote bug #559623 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 Chen Lei changed: What|Removed |Added CC||supercy...@163.com --- Comment #33 from Chen Lei 2010-01-28 01:56:54 EST --- (In reply to comment #32) > Could we upload JOGL 1.1 into Fedora/Redhat this way ? > And plan to do the gluegen/jogl separation when JOGL 2.0 is released (which > will be trivial since it will be done upstream). > Thanks > PS: can someone reopen this bug ? Hi, Sylvestre. I think you'd better open a new bugzilla report and mark this bugzilla report as a duplicate. PS: Which packages are not in fedora right now for packaging scilab 5.20? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #32 from Sylvestre Ledru 2010-01-15 04:23:23 EST --- Could we upload JOGL 1.1 into Fedora/Redhat this way ? And plan to do the gluegen/jogl separation when JOGL 2.0 is released (which will be trivial since it will be done upstream). Thanks PS: can someone reopen this bug ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
