[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-23 08:32:56 EDT --- lv2-ll-plugins-0.2.8-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|lv2-ll-plugins-0.2.8-4.fc13 |lv2-ll-plugins-0.2.8-4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-23 00:55:05 EDT --- lv2-ll-plugins-0.2.8-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||lv2-ll-plugins-0.2.8-4.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2010-09-23 00:55:11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-23 00:59:02 EDT --- lv2-ll-plugins-0.2.8-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|lv2-ll-plugins-0.2.8-4.fc12 |lv2-ll-plugins-0.2.8-4.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-06 01:15:24 EDT --- lv2-ll-plugins-0.2.8-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lv2-ll-plugins'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lv2-ll-plugins-0.2.8-4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-03 23:53:48 EDT --- lv2-ll-plugins-0.2.8-4.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lv2-ll-plugins-0.2.8-4.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-03 23:54:14 EDT --- lv2-ll-plugins-0.2.8-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lv2-ll-plugins-0.2.8-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-03 23:54:08 EDT --- lv2-ll-plugins-0.2.8-4.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lv2-ll-plugins-0.2.8-4.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2010-09-02 02:47:04 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: lv2-ll-plugins Short Description: Collection of LV2 plugins Owners: oget Branches: F-12 F-13 F-14 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-02 17:28:53 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 David Cornette r...@davidcornette.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from David Cornette r...@davidcornette.com 2010-08-25 03:10:10 EDT --- Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 --- Comment #9 from David Cornette r...@davidcornette.com 2010-08-22 16:31:10 EDT --- It sounds like a good idea to not package elven. If it is a separate project now, that makes things a little tricky going forward. You can imagine a user upgrade a plugin, and suddenly a program they have been using is gone. Or this plugin package would have to require an elven package, even though many users have no need for it. SO if you want to remove elven, and add the lv2core require, this should be good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 --- Comment #10 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2010-08-22 19:59:24 EDT --- Alright SPEC: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/lv2-ll-plugins.spec SRPM: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/lv2-ll-plugins-0.2.8-4.fc13.src.rpm changelog 0.2.8-4 - Add R: lv2core - Don't build and package elven as it is now a separate project - Remove BR: jack-audio-connection-kit-devel boost-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2010-08-08 22:35:28 EDT --- Hello, sorry I was too busy in the past week with the python-2.7 rebuilds for Fedora 14. (In reply to comment #7) There are a few issues to address. Here is the output of rpmlint: lv2-ll-plugins.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US arpeggiator - arpeggiate, arpeggio, appoggiatura lv2-ll-plugins.src:39: W: configure-without-libdir-spec lv2-ll-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US arpeggiator - arpeggiate, arpeggio, appoggiatura lv2-ll-plugins.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary elven /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SPECS/lv2-ll-plugins.spec:39: W: configure-without-libdir-spec Spelling is fine. I suppose we could file a bug against the words package if we wanted to be helpful, but that isn't necessary. You should email upstream about a man page. I talked to upstream about elven. Apparently, elven became a separate project: http://gitorious.org/elven/elven The next release of the ll plugins will not include elven. I should probably drop elven from our RPM. What do you think? I understand that configure isn't generated by autotools, but I am not sure you couldn't specify libdir instead of specifying lv2plugindir. It looks like lv2plugindir will be set to $(libdir)/lv2 by default, so why not just set libdir? Am I missing something? Well, we can do it either way. It really doesn't matter. This is more of a convention. I don't think this should be a blocker. Since the elven package is capable of displaying some plugins with guis, should there be .desktop files for it to start the included gui plugins? See above about dropping elven. But I don't think we should include a .desktop file. If we do, we need to supply a .desktop file for every lv2 plugin we ship. And this means that the elven package needs to be updated whenever some lv2-X-plugins package gets included in Fedora. This sounds impractical. This package needs to Require: lv2core for directory ownership. Ah good catch. I will add this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 David Cornette r...@davidcornette.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from David Cornette r...@davidcornette.com 2010-08-01 03:30:47 EDT --- There are a few issues to address. Here is the output of rpmlint: lv2-ll-plugins.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US arpeggiator - arpeggiate, arpeggio, appoggiatura lv2-ll-plugins.src:39: W: configure-without-libdir-spec lv2-ll-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US arpeggiator - arpeggiate, arpeggio, appoggiatura lv2-ll-plugins.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary elven /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SPECS/lv2-ll-plugins.spec:39: W: configure-without-libdir-spec Spelling is fine. I suppose we could file a bug against the words package if we wanted to be helpful, but that isn't necessary. You should email upstream about a man page. I understand that configure isn't generated by autotools, but I am not sure you couldn't specify libdir instead of specifying lv2plugindir. It looks like lv2plugindir will be set to $(libdir)/lv2 by default, so why not just set libdir? Am I missing something? Since the elven package is capable of displaying some plugins with guis, should there be .desktop files for it to start the included gui plugins? This package needs to Require: lv2core for directory ownership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2010-07-28 02:41:28 EDT --- Hello, slightly off-topic but, I just wanted to warn you that I rebuilt lv2-c++-tools against the new boost on rawhide. Since lv2-c++-tools contains a static library you need to rebuild lv2-EQ10Q-plugins against it. This is for rawhide only. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2010-07-27 00:57:35 EDT --- Apparently, I never built this on mock, because when I prepared it for review, lv2-c++-tools was not in the repos. I added the missing BRs. The DSO error is something that came with F-13. From F-13 on, Fedora does not allow indirect linking to libraries. So I added the missing link. Thanks for the warnings. SPEC: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/lv2-ll-plugins.spec SRPM: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/lv2-ll-plugins-0.2.8-3.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 Bug 567028 depends on bug 537363, which changed state. Bug 537363 Summary: Review Request: lv2-c++-tools - Support library for writing LV2 plugins in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537363 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2010-07-25 15:42:41 EDT --- Hello, are you still reviewing this? If not, let's set the Assigned To to null. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 --- Comment #4 from David Cornette r...@davidcornette.com 2010-07-26 00:52:04 EDT --- I have started to take a look at this package, and I am unable to get it to build in mock. It looks like it may be missing some BuildRequires. It looks like you need to add lv2core-devel and boost-devel. I tried building it outside of mock, where I already have those two packages installed, and got this error, which if I am not mistaken is a common one on F13: /usr/bin/ld: programs/elven/lv2host.o: undefined reference to symbol 'dlclose@@GLIBC_2.2.5' /usr/bin/ld: note: 'dlclose@@GLIBC_2.2.5' is defined in DSO /lib64/libdl.so.2 so try adding it to the linker command line /lib64/libdl.so.2: could not read symbols: Invalid operation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 David Cornette r...@davidcornette.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||r...@davidcornette.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|r...@davidcornette.com --- Comment #2 from David Cornette r...@davidcornette.com 2010-05-18 23:24:26 EDT --- I'll review this once its dependency is closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 567028] Review Request: lv2-ll-plugins - Collection of LV2 plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567028 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||537363 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
