[Bug 738746] Review Request: rubygem-coffee-script-source - A package for the coffee-script-source Ruby gem

2012-07-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738746

Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||vondr...@redhat.com

--- Comment #11 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
Hi Slavek,

Since Fotios seems to be busy, I updated his package to the latest
coffee-script-source version to keep going forward:

SPEC: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-coffee-script-source.spec
SRPM:
http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-coffee-script-source-1.3.3-1.fc18.src.rpm
Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4243247

Please note that the test suite is not possible to Run. The
rubygem-coffee-script is testing this package.

In ideal world, this package should not be needed, since we would have
independent coffee-script package, build from source. But that would be hard.
Since there is exception for javascript bundling, I would prefer to not dive
into this mess.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 738746] Review Request: rubygem-coffee-script-source - A package for the coffee-script-source Ruby gem

2012-07-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738746

Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #12 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com ---
 In ideal world, this package should not be needed, since we would have
 independent coffee-script package, build from source. But that would be
 hard. Since there is exception for javascript bundling, I would prefer to
 not dive into this mess.

Agreed.
Not much to review here :) The only thing that comes to my mind is that it
might be nice to ask upstream to include a license file in the package, but
this is not a blocker. This package is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 738746] Review Request: rubygem-coffee-script-source - A package for the coffee-script-source Ruby gem

2012-07-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738746

Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #13 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
@Slavek: Thank you for the review. I'll consider it :)

https://github.com/jashkenas/coffee-script/issues/2443

@Fotios: I am going to request the git repository. Please ask for
co-maintaining  or I am completely fine to hand the package over to you if you
like. Just let me know.


New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: rubygem-coffee-script-source
Short Description: The CoffeeScript Compiler
Owners: vondruch
Branches: 
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 738746] Review Request: rubygem-coffee-script-source - A package for the coffee-script-source Ruby gem

2012-03-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738746

--- Comment #10 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com 2012-03-26 
04:58:38 EDT ---
Hi Fotios, any progress on this? We will need this for new rails in F18, so it
would be great to have it ASAP.
Thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 738746] Review Request: rubygem-coffee-script-source - A package for the coffee-script-source Ruby gem

2012-02-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738746

--- Comment #8 from Fotios Lindiakos fot...@redhat.com 2012-02-29 10:44:31 
EST ---
Ok, followed your suggestions and here is a new package (note: SPEC is the same
location because it's controlled via git)
SPEC:
https://raw.github.com/fotioslindiakos/rubygem-all/master/SPECS/rubygem-coffee-script-source.spec
 
SRPM:
https://github.com/fotioslindiakos/rubygem-all/raw/master/SRPMS/rubygem-coffee-script-source-1.2.0-2.fc16.src.rpm
KOJI: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3840346

As for tests, there are tests upstream under the coffee-script package (which
includes this source package and a js runtime), but they can't be run without
additional dependencies. IMHO, since this source package, installing a
javascript runtime just for running the tests would defeat the purpose of
having a package with no deps. But this is my first package, so if that is a
common thing to do, let me know, I'd be happy to take care of it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 738746] Review Request: rubygem-coffee-script-source - A package for the coffee-script-source Ruby gem

2012-02-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738746

--- Comment #9 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com 2012-03-01 
01:30:18 EST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
 Ok, followed your suggestions and here is a new package (note: SPEC is the 
 same
 location because it's controlled via git)
 SPEC:
 https://raw.github.com/fotioslindiakos/rubygem-all/master/SPECS/rubygem-coffee-script-source.spec
  
 SRPM:
 https://github.com/fotioslindiakos/rubygem-all/raw/master/SRPMS/rubygem-coffee-script-source-1.2.0-2.fc16.src.rpm
 KOJI: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3840346
 
 As for tests, there are tests upstream under the coffee-script package (which
 includes this source package and a js runtime), but they can't be run without
 additional dependencies. IMHO, since this source package, installing a
 javascript runtime just for running the tests would defeat the purpose of
 having a package with no deps. But this is my first package, so if that is a
 common thing to do, let me know, I'd be happy to take care of it.

Well, my idea is, that you only run tests in Build time, not runtime. That way,
you may have many BR:, but runtime requires will stay the same.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 738746] Review Request: rubygem-coffee-script-source - A package for the coffee-script-source Ruby gem

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738746

--- Comment #6 from Fotios Lindiakos fot...@redhat.com 2012-02-28 09:47:58 
EST ---
Updated the package to build against rawhide and Ruby 1.9.1. Links to updated
files are included. I also successfully build the package in koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3827994

SPEC:
https://raw.github.com/fotioslindiakos/rubygem-all/master/SPECS/rubygem-coffee-script-source.spec

SRPM:
https://github.com/fotioslindiakos/rubygem-all/raw/master/SRPMS/rubygem-coffee-script-source-1.2.0-1.fc16.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 738746] Review Request: rubygem-coffee-script-source - A package for the coffee-script-source Ruby gem

2012-02-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738746

--- Comment #7 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com 2012-02-29 
02:07:02 EST ---
- Please bump the release when doing changes (you can use rpmdev-bumpspec) - or
if you are updating to newer version, you still need to add a changelog entry,
that notes it.
- According to [1], you can use the new macros for gem files and directories.
The only thing you need to do is define %gem_name, then you will have
%gem_instdir, %gem_cache, etc... Also, you should now have BR: rubygems-devel
instead of BR: ruby(rubygems) (the runtime dependency however stays on
ruby(rubygems) ).
- If there are tests available in the upstream, that are not present in the gem
itself, it a good custom to run them. You can see rubygem-delorean as an
example how to do that (you have to check them out from git separately in the
correct version and add them as another source).

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Ruby#Macros

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 738746] Review Request: rubygem-coffee-script-source - A package for the coffee-script-source Ruby gem

2012-02-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738746

--- Comment #5 from Fotios Lindiakos fot...@redhat.com 2012-02-27 11:55:52 
EST ---
Sorry, fell onto the back burner. I'm doing it right now, I'll update when I
have a new package for the latest version built against the new guidelines

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 738746] Review Request: rubygem-coffee-script-source - A package for the coffee-script-source Ruby gem

2012-02-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738746

--- Comment #4 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com 2012-02-27 
02:37:26 EST ---
Hi Fotios, any progress on this one? It is a requirement for Rails 3.2 stack,
which we would like to get to Rawhide ASAP, so we can have enough time to fix
all the things it will break.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 738746] Review Request: rubygem-coffee-script-source - A package for the coffee-script-source Ruby gem

2012-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738746

Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bkab...@redhat.com

--- Comment #1 from Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com 2012-01-30 07:42:52 
EST ---
I'll take this one.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 738746] Review Request: rubygem-coffee-script-source - A package for the coffee-script-source Ruby gem

2012-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738746

Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bkab...@redhat.com
   Flag||fedora-review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 738746] Review Request: rubygem-coffee-script-source - A package for the coffee-script-source Ruby gem

2012-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738746

--- Comment #2 from Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com 2012-01-30 07:56:36 
EST ---
- Please update to the latest upstream version (currently 1.2.0).
- Consider excluding cached gem. This is only used with gem pristine command,
which is irrelevant for RPM gems, as they should be restored by yum
reinstall.

* You probably haven't noticed, but we are moving to Ruby 1.9.3 in rawhide,
which involves some changes to the gem packaging - see [1] for new guidelines
draft. Some information can be found on Ruby-sig fedora mailing list [2] (you
should subscribe to that one, if you haven't already).
* Currently, we only build new packages for Ruby 1.9.3 in its special target
f17-ruby (again, all the info is is [2]).
* I suggest you update to the latest version, then we can sort out any
leftovers and I can also help you with the new-style packaging. The package
looks good, so I think it shouldn't be a problem.


[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Ruby
[2] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/2012-January/000805.html

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 738746] Review Request: rubygem-coffee-script-source - A package for the coffee-script-source Ruby gem

2012-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738746

--- Comment #3 from Fotios Lindiakos fot...@redhat.com 2012-01-30 10:08:30 
EST ---
Thanks for picking this up! I'll look over those suggestions and update the
package to the newest version.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 738746] Review Request: rubygem-coffee-script-source - A package for the coffee-script-source Ruby gem

2011-09-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738746

Fotios Lindiakos fot...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR),
   ||738742

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review