[Bug 741945] Review Request: python-isodate - An ISO 8601 date/time/duration parser and formater

2012-01-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741945

James Laska jla...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #11 from James Laska jla...@redhat.com 2012-01-24 09:12:38 EST ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: python-isodate
New Branches: el6 f15
Owners: jlaska

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 741945] Review Request: python-isodate - An ISO 8601 date/time/duration parser and formater

2012-01-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741945

--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-01-24 09:16:08 EST 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 741945] Review Request: python-isodate - An ISO 8601 date/time/duration parser and formater

2011-12-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741945

Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed||2011-12-08 07:44:59

--- Comment #10 from Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2011-12-08 07:44:59 EST ---
Closing this out as this is now in Fedora

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 741945] Review Request: python-isodate - An ISO 8601 date/time/duration parser and formater

2011-10-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741945

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-09 
15:39:37 EDT ---
python-isodate-0.4.4-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 741945] Review Request: python-isodate - An ISO 8601 date/time/duration parser and formater

2011-10-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741945

James Laska jla...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||743402

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 741945] Review Request: python-isodate - An ISO 8601 date/time/duration parser and formater

2011-10-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741945

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-04 
15:46:31 EDT ---
python-isodate-0.4.4-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13548

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 741945] Review Request: python-isodate - An ISO 8601 date/time/duration parser and formater

2011-10-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741945

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 741945] Review Request: python-isodate - An ISO 8601 date/time/duration parser and formater

2011-09-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741945

James Laska jla...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mmo...@redhat.com
   Flag||needinfo?(mmo...@redhat.com
   ||)

--- Comment #4 from James Laska jla...@redhat.com 2011-09-30 08:21:17 EDT ---
Mo: anyone else you can think of who would like to be an owner/cc of this
package?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 741945] Review Request: python-isodate - An ISO 8601 date/time/duration parser and formater

2011-09-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741945

--- Comment #3 from James Laska jla...@redhat.com 2011-09-30 08:19:54 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
 Overall looks good, koji build is green

Thanks for the review!

 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3388155
 
 A few nits
 
 * BuildRoot is no longer needed and should be removed

Thanks, removed.  I also replaced the use of $RPM_OPT_FLAGS with %{optflags}
for consistent macro use.

 * same w/ the rm buildroot in the install and clean sections

Looks like that isn't required for F13 and newer.  I'll probably leave this for
EL6 packages, unless I can confirm that it's no longer needed there either.

 * Do we still need the exceptions for the older non-supported Fedora versions?
 I see these in the python guidelines though so if they are required you can
 just ignore this note

I left them mainly for EL5 or EL6 compat.  I could be pedantic, and they're
just not needed anymore.  I'll try to confirm.

 * is python-devel required as a build time dependency (again see this in the
 python guideliness, but this is my first python package review so I could be
 mistaken)

Excellent catch.  Normally, yes.  The package python-devel provides the
distutils library which is needed by many python packages that 'import
distutils' from inside their setup.py.  In the case of isodate, it's doing
'from setuptools import setup'.  For that, I've added a BuildRequires:
python-setuptools.

*BUT*, I missed that I'm relying on distutils for the %{python_sitelib} macro. 
So it is needed.  Thanks!

 From what I can tell, everything else looks good, so APPROVED

Thanks again.  I updated the .spec and src.rpm posted from comment#0, and will
request SCM shortly.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 741945] Review Request: python-isodate - An ISO 8601 date/time/duration parser and formater

2011-09-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741945

Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?(mmo...@redhat.com |
   |)   |

--- Comment #5 from Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2011-09-30 08:27:34 EDT ---
Hrm not sure, since its a pulp dependency and not an aeolus one,probably don't
have the cycles to take it on my plate. Perhaps ping'ing one of the pulp
guys/gals?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 741945] Review Request: python-isodate - An ISO 8601 date/time/duration parser and formater

2011-09-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741945

James Laska jla...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #6 from James Laska jla...@redhat.com 2011-09-30 08:56:38 EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-isodate
Short Description: An ISO 8601 date/time/duration parser and formater
Owners: jlaska jmatthews
Branches: f16
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 741945] Review Request: python-isodate - An ISO 8601 date/time/duration parser and formater

2011-09-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741945

--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-09-30 09:27:38 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 741945] Review Request: python-isodate - An ISO 8601 date/time/duration parser and formater

2011-09-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741945

Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||mmo...@redhat.com
   Flag||fedora-review?

--- Comment #1 from Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2011-09-29 10:26:26 EDT ---
Taking this one

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Bug 741945] Review Request: python-isodate - An ISO 8601 date/time/duration parser and formater

2011-09-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741945

Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #2 from Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2011-09-29 10:31:02 EDT ---
Overall looks good, koji build is green

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3388155

A few nits

* BuildRoot is no longer needed and should be removed

* same w/ the rm buildroot in the install and clean sections

* Do we still need the exceptions for the older non-supported Fedora versions?
I see these in the python guidelienss though so if they are required you can
just ignore this note

* is python-devel required as a build time dependency (again see this in the
python guideliness, but this is my first python package review so I could be
mistaken)

From what I can tell, everything else looks good, so APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review