[Bug 809843] Review Request: perl-Test-Reporter - Sends test results to cpan-test...@perl.org

2014-12-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Test-Reporter-1.58-1.f |perl-Test-Reporter-1.60-3.e
   |c18 |l7
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Test-Reporter-1.60-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 809843] Review Request: perl-Test-Reporter - Sends test results to cpan-test...@perl.org

2014-11-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Test-Reporter-1.60-3.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-Reporter-1.60-3.el7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 809843] Review Request: perl-Test-Reporter - Sends test results to cpan-test...@perl.org

2014-11-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843



--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 809843] Review Request: perl-Test-Reporter - Sends test results to cpan-test...@perl.org

2014-11-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 809843] Review Request: perl-Test-Reporter - Sends test results to cpan-test...@perl.org

2014-11-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||dd...@cpan.org



--- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
*** Bug 1161825 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 809843] Review Request: perl-Test-Reporter - Sends test results to cpan-test...@perl.org

2014-11-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843



--- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
David feel free to request for the epel7 branch and maintain this package there
yourself.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 809843] Review Request: perl-Test-Reporter - Sends test results to cpan-test...@perl.org

2014-11-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843

David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #8 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org ---
Thanks Petr!

Package Change Request
==
Package Name: perl-Test-Reporter 
New Branches: epel7
Owners: ddick
InitialCC: perl-sig, ppisar

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 809843] Review Request: perl-Test-Reporter - Sends test results to cpan-test...@perl.org

2012-04-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843

--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2012-04-13 08:35:41 EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-Test-Reporter 
Short Description: Sends test results to cpan-test...@perl.org
Owners: ppisar mmaslano psabata
Branches: 
InitialCC: perl-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 809843] Review Request: perl-Test-Reporter - Sends test results to cpan-test...@perl.org

2012-04-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 809843] Review Request: perl-Test-Reporter - Sends test results to cpan-test...@perl.org

2012-04-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843

--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-04-13 09:12:22 EDT 
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 809843] Review Request: perl-Test-Reporter - Sends test results to cpan-test...@perl.org

2012-04-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843

Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Reporter-1.58-1.f
   ||c18
 Resolution||RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2012-04-13 09:45:09

--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2012-04-13 09:45:09 EDT ---
Thank you for the review and the repository.

I decided to keep the COPYING file because I believe upstream will fix it in
next release. In addition, the file does not contradict copyright. It's just a
little stronger.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 809843] Review Request: perl-Test-Reporter - Sends test results to cpan-test...@perl.org

2012-04-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843

Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||psab...@redhat.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com
   Flag||fedora-review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 809843] Review Request: perl-Test-Reporter - Sends test results to cpan-test...@perl.org

2012-04-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843

Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+

--- Comment #2 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com 2012-04-12 10:44:10 EDT ---
Package Review
==

Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated


 Generic 
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
 least one supported primary architecture.
[-]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
 Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
 Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm  4.4
 Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[-]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
 Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[!]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: No licenses found! Please check the source files for licenses
 manually.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
/home/contyk/src/review/809843/Test-Reporter-1.58.tar.gz :
  MD5SUM this package : 52ef5471e28ea441c0239606b1bb93e6
  MD5SUM upstream package : 52ef5471e28ea441c0239606b1bb93e6
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[-]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
 separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
 include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
 /usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
 --requires).
[?]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
 upstream.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[-]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[x]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[-]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.

Issues:
TODO: With respect to Comment #1, including the COPYING file doesn't make sense

[Bug 809843] Review Request: perl-Test-Reporter - Sends test results to cpan-test...@perl.org

2012-04-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809843

--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2012-04-05 02:43:41 EDT ---
This package is licensed as (GPL+ or Artistic) despite the COPYING file is
GPLv3 copy. Thus spake upstream:


From: David Golden dagol...@cpan.org
To: Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Test::Report lincense

The COPYING file is incorrect.  The license is Artistic 1 or GPL 1 (or
later GPL).

David

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
 Hello,

 I have a question regarding Test-Report-1.58 license. The lib/Test/Reporter.pm
 POD states:

 This is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under
 the same terms as the Perl 5 programming language system itself.

 and LICENSE file confirms it:

 Terms of the Perl programming language system itself
 a) the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
   Software Foundation; either version 1, or (at your option) any
   later version, or
 b) the Artistic License

 But the distributed COPYING file quotes GPLv3 license.

 It's confusing for me. Is Test-Report licensed as (GPLv1+ or Artistic) or
 (GPLv3+ or Artistic)?

 -- Petr

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review