Re: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-8.0 released
*again with my subscribed email address* Am 06.07.2020 um 03:23 schrieb jenk...@build.gluster.org: > SRC: > https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/121/artifact/glusterfs-8.0.tar.gz > HASH: > https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/121/artifact/glusterfs-8.0.sha512sum > > This release is made off jenkins-release-121 > Hi, I have got a problem with the new libglusterd library: W: libglusterd0: shared-library-lacks-prerequisites usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterd.so.0.0.1 N: N: The listed shared library doesn't include information about the other N: libraries against which it was linked. N: N: More specifically, "ldd foo.so" should report such other libraries. In N: your case, it reports "statically linked". N: N: The fix is to specify the libraries. One way to do so is to add N: something like "-lc" to the command-line options for "ld". N: N: Severity: warning N: N: Check: binaries ___ packaging mailing list packaging@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
Re: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-8.0 released
Am 06.07.2020 um 03:23 schrieb jenk...@build.gluster.org: > SRC: > https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/121/artifact/glusterfs-8.0.tar.gz > HASH: > https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/121/artifact/glusterfs-8.0.sha512sum > > This release is made off jenkins-release-121 > Hi, I have got a problem with the new libglusterd library: W: libglusterd0: shared-library-lacks-prerequisites usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterd.so.0.0.1 N: N: The listed shared library doesn't include information about the other N: libraries against which it was linked. N: N: More specifically, "ldd foo.so" should report such other libraries. In N: your case, it reports "statically linked". N: N: The fix is to specify the libraries. One way to do so is to add N: something like "-lc" to the command-line options for "ld". N: N: Severity: warning N: N: Check: binaries -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer Blog: https://www.linux-dev.org/ E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org */ ___ packaging mailing list packaging@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
Re: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] Requesting for an early 5.6 release
Am 08.04.2019 um 16:04 schrieb Shyam Ranganathan: > On 4/6/19 1:47 AM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We had a critical bug [1], that got introduced in gluster release 5. >> There are users waiting on an update with the fix. Hence requesting for >> an out of band release for 5.6. Myself and jiffin, volunteer to do some >> tasks of the release- tagging(?) testing. But would need help with the >> builds and other tasks. Hi, Debian Buster 10 is now in freeze and I were able to pull in version 5.5 instead of 5.4 for it. Pulling again a new upstream version to buster could be difficult.. Could you point me to the bug report and the diff for the critical fix, so that I can upload this explicit change to buster? -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer Blog: http://www.linux-dev.org/ E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org */ ___ packaging mailing list packaging@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
Re: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-4.1.5 released
Am 21.09.2018 um 19:00 schrieb Kaleb S. KEITHLEY: > On 09/21/2018 10:14 AM, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote: >> SRC: >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/70/artifact/glusterfs-4.1.5.tar.gz >> HASH: >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/70/artifact/glusterfs-4.1.5.sha512sum >> >> This release is made off jenkins-release-70 >> >> >> >> ___ >> packaging mailing list >> packaging@gluster.org >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging >> > glusterfs-4.1.5 packages for: > > * Fedora 28 and 29 are in the Fedora Updates-Testing or Rawhide > repo. Use `dnf` to install. Fedora packages will move to the Fedora > Updates repo after a nominal testing period. Fedora 27 packages are at [1] > > * Debian Stretch/9 and Buster/10(Sid) are on download.gluster.org at [1] > (arm64 packages coming soon.) > > * Xenial/16.04, Bionic/18.04, and Cosmic/18.10 are on Launchpad at [2]. > > * SUSE SLES12, Leap42.3, Tumbleweed, SLES15, and Leap15 are on OpenSUSE > Build Service at [3]. > > The .../LATEST and .../4.1/LATEST symlinks have been updated. > > [1] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/4.1 > [2] https://launchpad.net/~gluster/+archive/ubuntu/glusterfs-4.1 > [3] https://build.opensuse.org/project/subprojects/home:glusterfs > Debian is also already updated in testing+unstable+buster to 4.1.5-1 and now I just updated the stretch backports package from 4.0.2-1~bpo9+1 to 4.1.5-1~bpo9+1. See also: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/glusterfs -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer Blog: http://www.linux-dev.org/ E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org */ ___ packaging mailing list packaging@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
[gluster-packaging] Fwd: Bug#873878: glusterfs-client: mount.glusterfs needs bash as /bin/sh
Hi,
how should it be fixed for glusterfs now? Better shell code without
bashishm or do you want /bin/bash as shebang?
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff:Bug#873878: glusterfs-client: mount.glusterfs needs bash as
/bin/sh
Weitersenden-Datum: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 20:21:01 +
Weitersenden-Von: Michael Lundkvist <brels.deb...@solske.net>
Weitersenden-An:debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org
Weitersenden-CC: Patrick Matthäi <pmatth...@debian.org>
Datum: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 21:46:18 +0200
Von:Michael Lundkvist <brels.deb...@solske.net>
Antwort an: Michael Lundkvist <brels.deb...@solske.net>,
873...@bugs.debian.org
An: Debian Bug Tracking System <sub...@bugs.debian.org>
Package: glusterfs-client
Version: 3.12.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 10.4
Version 3.12 of Glusterfs adds code in /sbin/mount.glusterfs that depends on
bash.
With dash as /bin/sh, I get the following error message when trying to mount a
glusterfs volume:
> /sbin/mount.glusterfs: 667: /sbin/mount.glusterfs: Bad substitution
Line 667 is:
667 [ ${volume_str:0:1} = '/' ] && {
Modifying mount.glusterfs to use /bin/bash makes it possible to mount again.
/Micke
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.12.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages glusterfs-client depends on:
ii fuse 2.9.7-1
ii glusterfs-common 3.12.0-1
ii libc6 2.24-17
ii libssl1.1 1.1.0f-5
ii python2.7.13-2
glusterfs-client recommends no packages.
glusterfs-client suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
___
packaging mailing list
packaging@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
Re: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.11.0 released
Am 02.06.2017 um 13:49 schrieb Niels de Vos:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 10:55:34AM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>
>> 1) gluster group: shouldn't the init script chgrp the statedump dir on
>> starting glusterfs? /run (or /var/run) are on most systems on tmpfs
> We use a tmpfiles.d/ snippet for that on systemd environments. Older RPM
> distributions do not have /var/run as tmpfs and the owner/group are
> properties of the RPM contents.
Thanks for your hint. I have added extras/run-gluster.tmpfiles.in to the
packaging.
>
>> 2) Patch 02-init-remote-fs.diff: please merge it
> This introduces a dependency for starting the glusterd management
> daemon. Before starting the daemon, the $remote_fs service(s) need to
> start. This will be a problem for fuse.glusterfs mountpoints that are
> listed in /etc/fstab. Can you explain why this is not a problem or if it
> is something that was missed?
I have dropped it now, too. Looks like the requirement on $remote_fs
(for a mounted /usr) is obsolete with Debian Stretch now.
>> 4) Patch 03-shell-script-syntax.diff: it fixes syntax errors with dash
>> and bash. To be checked by you is my change of $b(/.*)? to just $b -
>> cant recognize what do you try there. It fails in dash and bash
This "$b(/.*)?" issue is still there:
E: glusterfs-server: shell-script-fails-syntax-check
var/lib/glusterd/hooks/1/create/post/S10selinux-label-brick.sh
N:
N:Running this shell script with the shell's -n option set fails, which
N:means that the script has syntax errors. The most common cause of this
N:problem is a script expecting /bin/sh to be bash checked on a system
N:using dash as /bin/sh.
N:
N:Run e.g. sh -n yourscript to see the errors yourself.
me@srv1:~/build/glusterfs-3.11.1$ LC_ALL=C bash -n
./extras/hook-scripts/create/post/S10selinux-label-brick.sh
./extras/hook-scripts/create/post/S10selinux-label-brick.sh: line 46:
syntax error near unexpected token `('
./extras/hook-scripts/create/post/S10selinux-label-brick.sh: line 46:
`semanage fcontext --add -t glusterd_brick_t -r s0 $b(/.*)?'
me@srv1:~/build/glusterfs-3.11.1$ LC_ALL=C dash -n
./extras/hook-scripts/create/post/S10selinux-label-brick.sh
./extras/hook-scripts/create/post/S10selinux-label-brick.sh: 46:
./extras/hook-scripts/create/post/S10selinux-label-brick.sh: Syntax
error: "(" unexpected (expecting "done")
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
Blog: http://www.linux-dev.org/
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
*/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
packaging mailing list
packaging@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
Re: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.11.1 released
Am 27.06.2017 um 17:25 schrieb Gluster Build System:
>
> SRC: http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.11.1.tar.gz
>
> This release is made off jenkins-release-200
>
> -- Gluster Build System
> ___
> packaging mailing list
> packaging@gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
Hi,
thanks, uploading to Debian now. Please merge the attached patch and
tell the author, to avoid the same faults again and again ;)
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
Blog: http://www.linux-dev.org/
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
*/
# Fix new spelling errors.
diff -Naur glusterfs-3.11.1.orig/libglusterfs/src/event-epoll.c
glusterfs-3.11.1/libglusterfs/src/event-epoll.c
--- glusterfs-3.11.1.orig/libglusterfs/src/event-epoll.c2017-06-27
17:25:12.258136867 +0200
+++ glusterfs-3.11.1/libglusterfs/src/event-epoll.c 2017-06-30
12:18:37.450755846 +0200
@@ -489,7 +489,7 @@
This not only saves a system call, but also
avoids possibility of another epoll thread
- parallely picking up the next event while the
+ parallelly picking up the next event while the
ongoing handler is still in progress (and
resulting in unnecessary contention on
rpc_transport_t->mutex).
diff -Naur glusterfs-3.11.1.orig/xlators/cluster/dht/src/dht-shared.c
glusterfs-3.11.1/xlators/cluster/dht/src/dht-shared.c
--- glusterfs-3.11.1.orig/xlators/cluster/dht/src/dht-shared.c 2017-06-27
17:25:12.333137017 +0200
+++ glusterfs-3.11.1/xlators/cluster/dht/src/dht-shared.c 2017-06-30
12:16:39.491250769 +0200
@@ -489,7 +489,7 @@
DHT_MSG_INVALID_OPTION,
"Invalid option: Reconfigure: "
"rebal-throttle should be
{lazy|normal|aggressive}"
- " or a number upto number of cores
available,"
+ " or a number up to number of cores
available,"
" not (%s), defaulting to (%d)",
temp_str, conf->dthrottle);
ret = -1;
@@ -874,7 +874,7 @@
DHT_MSG_INVALID_OPTION,
"Invalid option: Reconfigure: "
"rebal-throttle should be
{lazy|normal|aggressive}"
- " or a number upto number of cores
available,"
+ " or a number up to number of cores
available,"
" not (%s), defaulting to (%d)",
temp_str, conf->dthrottle);
ret = -1;
diff -Naur glusterfs-3.11.1.orig/xlators/features/trash/src/trash.c
glusterfs-3.11.1/xlators/features/trash/src/trash.c
--- glusterfs-3.11.1.orig/xlators/features/trash/src/trash.c2017-06-27
17:25:12.366137083 +0200
+++ glusterfs-3.11.1/xlators/features/trash/src/trash.c 2017-06-30
12:18:08.478877438 +0200
@@ -1890,7 +1890,7 @@
if (buf->ia_size > (priv->max_trash_file_size) ||
buf->ia_size <= local->fop_offset) {
gf_log (this->name, GF_LOG_DEBUG, "%s: not moving to trash , "
- "having inappropiate file size", local->loc.path);
+ "having inappropriate file size", local->loc.path);
STACK_WIND (frame, trash_common_unwind_buf_cbk,
FIRST_CHILD(this),
diff -Naur
glusterfs-3.11.1.orig/xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-volume-set.c
glusterfs-3.11.1/xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-volume-set.c
--- glusterfs-3.11.1.orig/xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-volume-set.c
2017-06-27 17:25:12.390137131 +0200
+++ glusterfs-3.11.1/xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-volume-set.c
2017-06-30 12:18:43.410730828 +0200
@@ -3276,7 +3276,7 @@
.op_version = GD_OP_VERSION_3_10_0,
.validate_fn = validate_parallel_readdir,
.description = "If this option is enabled, the readdir operation is "
- "performed parallely on all the bricks, thus
improving"
+ "performed parallelly on all the bricks, thus
improving"
" the performance of readdir. Note that the
performance"
"improvement is higher in large clusters"
},
___
packaging mailing list
packaging@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
Re: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.11.0 released
Am 30.05.2017 um 15:24 schrieb Gluster Build System:
>
> SRC: http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.11.0.tar.gz
>
> This release is made off jenkins-release-197
>
> -- Gluster Build System
> ___
> packaging mailing list
> packaging@gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
Thanks for this release. I have uploaded it to the Debian repository,
which now also adds the "gluster" group. But I have got some questions /
patches:
1) gluster group: shouldn't the init script chgrp the statedump dir on
starting glusterfs? /run (or /var/run) are on most systems on tmpfs
2) Patch 02-init-remote-fs.diff: please merge it
3) Patch 04-spelling-errors.diff: please merge it, same procedure as
every release.. ;)
4) Patch 03-shell-script-syntax.diff: it fixes syntax errors with dash
and bash. To be checked by you is my change of $b(/.*)? to just $b -
cant recognize what do you try there. It fails in dash and bash
Thank you
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
Blog: http://www.linux-dev.org/
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
*/
# Add missing dependency on $remote_fs
diff -Naur glusterfs-3.10.1.orig/extras/init.d/glusterd-Debian.in
glusterfs-3.10.1/extras/init.d/glusterd-Debian.in
--- glusterfs-3.10.1.orig/extras/init.d/glusterd-Debian.in 2017-03-30
20:35:57.198620558 +0200
+++ glusterfs-3.10.1/extras/init.d/glusterd-Debian.in 2017-03-31
14:21:47.718509753 +0200
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
#!/bin/sh
### BEGIN INIT INFO
# Provides: glusterd
-# Required-Start:$local_fs $network
-# Required-Stop: $local_fs $network
+# Required-Start:$local_fs $remote_fs $network
+# Required-Stop: $local_fs $remote_fs $network
# Default-Start: 2 3 4 5
# Default-Stop: 0 1 6
# Short-Description: Gluster File System service for volume management
diff -Naur glusterfs-3.10.1.orig/extras/init.d/glustereventsd-Debian.in
glusterfs-3.10.1/extras/init.d/glustereventsd-Debian.in
--- glusterfs-3.10.1.orig/extras/init.d/glustereventsd-Debian.in
2017-03-30 20:35:57.198620558 +0200
+++ glusterfs-3.10.1/extras/init.d/glustereventsd-Debian.in 2017-03-31
14:22:13.682370100 +0200
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
#!/bin/sh
### BEGIN INIT INFO
# Provides: glustereventsd
-# Required-Start:$local_fs $network
-# Required-Stop: $local_fs $network
+# Required-Start:$local_fs $remote_fs $network
+# Required-Stop: $local_fs $remote_fs $network
# Default-Start: 2 3 4 5
# Default-Stop: 0 1 6
# Short-Description: Gluster Events Server
# Fix syntax errors in shell script.
# TODO: $b(/.*)? fails in dash and bash. Maybe this has to get fixed on
# another way.
diff -Naur
glusterfs-3.11.0.orig/extras/hook-scripts/create/post/S10selinux-label-brick.sh
glusterfs-3.11.0/extras/hook-scripts/create/post/S10selinux-label-brick.sh
---
glusterfs-3.11.0.orig/extras/hook-scripts/create/post/S10selinux-label-brick.sh
2017-05-30 15:23:46.476785612 +0200
+++ glusterfs-3.11.0/extras/hook-scripts/create/post/S10selinux-label-brick.sh
2017-06-01 10:23:06.782426237 +0200
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
OPTSPEC="volname:"
VOL=
-function parse_args () {
+parse_args () {
ARGS=$(getopt -l $OPTSPEC -name $PROGNAME $@)
eval set -- "$ARGS"
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
done
}
-function set_brick_labels()
+set_brick_labels()
{
volname=$1
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
do
# Add a file context for each brick path and associate with the
# glusterd_brick_t SELinux type.
-semanage fcontext --add -t glusterd_brick_t -r s0 $b(/.*)?
+semanage fcontext --add -t glusterd_brick_t -r s0 $b
# Set the labels on the new brick path.
restorecon -R $b
# Fix new spelling errors.
diff -Naur glusterfs-3.11.0.orig/tests/basic/gfapi/gfapi-ssl-test.t
glusterfs-3.11.0/tests/basic/gfapi/gfapi-ssl-test.t
--- glusterfs-3.11.0.orig/tests/basic/gfapi/gfapi-ssl-test.t2017-05-30
15:23:46.530785720 +0200
+++ glusterfs-3.11.0/tests/basic/gfapi/gfapi-ssl-test.t 2017-06-01
10:32:41.087581891 +0200
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
cleanup;
-# NetBSD build scripts are not upto date therefore this test
+# NetBSD build scripts are not up to date therefore this test
# is failing in NetBSD. Therefore skipping the test in NetBSD
# as of now.
#G_TESTDEF_TEST_STATUS_NETBSD7=KNOWN_ISSUE,BUG=00
diff -Naur glusterfs-3.11.0.orig/tests/bugs/distribute/bug-915554.t
glusterfs-3.11.0/tests/bugs/distribute/bug-915554.t
--- glusterfs-3.11.0.orig/tests/bugs/distribute/bug-915554.t2017-05-30
15:23:46.539785738 +0200
+++ glusterfs-3.11.0/tests/bugs/distribute/bug-915554.t 2017-06-01
10:32:18.359694757 +0200
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
TEST $CLI volume rebalance $V0 start force
-# check if rebalance has completed
Re: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.9.1 released
Am 17.01.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Gluster Build System:
>
> SRC: http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.9.1.tar.gz
>
> This release is made off jenkins-release-182
>
> -- Gluster Build System
> ___
> packaging mailing list
> packaging@gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
Hi,
on a Debian system 3.9.{0,1} fails at make install, because it tries to
install a non existent file glustereventsd-Debian:
Making install in doc
/bin/mkdir -p '/build/glusterfs-3.9.1/debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man8'
/usr/bin/install -c -m 644 glusterfs.8 mount.glusterfs.8 gluster.8
glusterd.8 glusterfsd.8
'/build/glusterfs-3.9.1/debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man8'
Making install in extras
Making install in init.d
/usr/bin/install: cannot stat 'glustereventsd-Debian': No such file or
directory
Makefile:572: recipe for target 'Debian' failed
make[4]: *** [Debian] Error 1
Makefile:462: recipe for target 'install-am' failed
make[3]: *** [install-am] Error 2
Makefile:655: recipe for target 'install-recursive' failed
make[2]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
Makefile:589: recipe for target 'install-recursive' failed
make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/build/glusterfs-3.9.1'
dh_auto_install: make -j1 install
DESTDIR=/build/glusterfs-3.9.1/debian/tmp AM_UPDATE_INFO_DIR=no returned
exit code 2
debian/rules:9: recipe for target 'binary' failed
And please apply the attached patch :)
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
Blog: http://www.linux-dev.org/
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
*/
# Fix spelling errors in source.
diff -Naur glusterfs-3.9.1.orig/api/src/glfs-mgmt.c
glusterfs-3.9.1/api/src/glfs-mgmt.c
--- glusterfs-3.9.1.orig/api/src/glfs-mgmt.c2017-01-17 19:47:06.594255690
+0100
+++ glusterfs-3.9.1/api/src/glfs-mgmt.c 2017-01-19 16:12:42.250198969 +0100
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@
if (-1 == req->rpc_status) {
gf_msg (frame->this->name, GF_LOG_ERROR, EINVAL,
API_MSG_INVALID_ENTRY,
-"GET_VOLUME_INFO RPC call is not successfull");
+"GET_VOLUME_INFO RPC call is not successful");
errno = EINVAL;
ret = -1;
goto out;
diff -Naur glusterfs-3.9.1.orig/xlators/cluster/dht/src/dht-common.c
glusterfs-3.9.1/xlators/cluster/dht/src/dht-common.c
--- glusterfs-3.9.1.orig/xlators/cluster/dht/src/dht-common.c 2017-01-17
19:47:06.730255961 +0100
+++ glusterfs-3.9.1/xlators/cluster/dht/src/dht-common.c2017-01-19
16:12:42.254198945 +0100
@@ -1715,7 +1715,7 @@
* be unlinked (performed in the "else if" block below)
*
* But if a linkto file is found on hashed subvolume, it may
be
- * pointing to vaild cached node. So unlinking of linkto
+ * pointing to valid cached node. So unlinking of linkto
* file on hashed subvolume is skipped and inside
* dht_lookup_everywhere_done, checks are performed. If this
* linkto file is found as stale linkto file, it is deleted
diff -Naur glusterfs-3.9.1.orig/xlators/features/bit-rot/src/bitd/bit-rot.c
glusterfs-3.9.1/xlators/features/bit-rot/src/bitd/bit-rot.c
--- glusterfs-3.9.1.orig/xlators/features/bit-rot/src/bitd/bit-rot.c
2017-01-17 19:47:06.749255999 +0100
+++ glusterfs-3.9.1/xlators/features/bit-rot/src/bitd/bit-rot.c 2017-01-19
16:12:42.254198945 +0100
@@ -1211,7 +1211,7 @@
fsscrub = >fsscrub;
/**
- * if this child already witnesses a successfull connection earlier
+ * if this child already witnesses a successful connection earlier
* there's no need to initialize mutexes, condvars, etc..
*/
if (_br_child_witnessed_connection (child))
diff -Naur glusterfs-3.9.1.orig/xlators/features/trash/src/trash.c
glusterfs-3.9.1/xlators/features/trash/src/trash.c
--- glusterfs-3.9.1.orig/xlators/features/trash/src/trash.c 2017-01-17
19:47:06.771256046 +0100
+++ glusterfs-3.9.1/xlators/features/trash/src/trash.c 2017-01-19
16:12:42.254198945 +0100
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@
local->newloc.inode = inode_new (local->loc.inode->table);
local->newfd = fd_create (local->newloc.inode, frame->root->pid);
-/* Creating vaild parent and pargfids for both files */
+/* Creating valid parent and pargfids for both files */
if (dir_entry == NULL) {
ret = EINVAL;
diff -Naur glusterfs-3.9.1.orig/xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-rpc-ops.c
glusterfs-3.9.1/xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-rpc-ops.c
--- glusterfs-3.9.1.orig/xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-rpc-ops.c
2017-01-17 19:47:06.787256077 +0100
+++ glust
Re: [gluster-packaging] packaging for Debian and Ubuntu
Hola,
I have already uploaded 3.7.5-1 to Debian itself. So we have got now:
me@exez:~$ rmadison glusterfs
glusterfs | 3.0.5-1| oldoldstable | source
glusterfs | 3.2.7-3+deb7u1~bpo60+1 | squeeze-backports | source
glusterfs | 3.2.7-3+deb7u1 | oldstable | source
glusterfs | 3.5.2-1~bpo70+1| wheezy-backports | source
glusterfs | 3.5.2-2| stable-kfreebsd | source
glusterfs | 3.5.2-2+deb8u1 | stable| source
glusterfs | 3.7.4-1~bpo8+1 | jessie-backports | source
glusterfs | 3.7.4-1| testing | source
glusterfs | 3.7.4-1| unstable | source
glusterfs | 3.7.5-1| buildd-unstable | source
glusterfs | 3.7.5-1| unstable | source
Am 08.10.2015 um 07:32 schrieb Hari Gowtham:
> Hi,
> I am happy to try Debian (jessie,stretch) this time.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mohamed Ashiq Liyazudeen" <mliya...@redhat.com>
> To: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" <kkeit...@redhat.com>
> Cc: packaging@gluster.org, "Poornima Gurusiddaiah" <pguru...@redhat.com>,
> "Kaushal M" <kaus...@redhat.com>, "Humble Chirammal" <hchir...@redhat.com>,
> "M S Vishwanath Bhat" <vb...@redhat.com>, hgowt...@redhat.com
> Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2015 10:12:26 AM
> Subject: Re: [gluster-packaging] packaging for Debian and Ubuntu
>
> Hi,
>
> I am Interested in doing Ubuntu/{trusty,vivid} build.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" <kkeit...@redhat.com>
> To: packaging@gluster.org
> Cc: mliya...@redhat.com, "Poornima Gurusiddaiah" <pguru...@redhat.com>,
> "Kaushal M" <kaus...@redhat.com>, "Humble Chirammal" <hchir...@redhat.com>,
> "M S Vishwanath Bhat" <vb...@redhat.com>, hgowt...@redhat.com
> Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2015 11:47:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [gluster-packaging] packaging for Debian and Ubuntu
>
> Hi,
>
> We need volunteers to do Debian and Ubuntu builds of 3.7.5.
>
> The last time msvbhat did Debian and Hari did Ubuntu.
>
> This time around we need Debian/{jessie,stretch} and Ubuntu/{trusty,vivid}
>
> Perhaps we can have different volunteers this time. MS and Hari can help
> out. And you can call on me with any questions.
>
> Thanks,
>
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
Blog: http://www.linux-dev.org/
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
*/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
packaging mailing list
packaging@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
