Re: [packman] XBMC 11.0

2012-03-29 Diskussionsfäden Herbert Graeber

Hi Mariusz

Am 29.03.2012 02:15, schrieb Mariusz Fik:

Dnia środa, 28 marca 2012 09:36:56 Sagi Ben-Akiva pisze:

sorry for not answering to your emails, but 2 days ago I, finally, decided
to upgrade my PC to openSUSE 12.1.
It took more than 24 hours to download ~2100 packages and now I can't login
to my system (KDE crashes after login)
but this is a different story.

OK, so we will stay with xbmc as the package name.

Regarding libnfs, yes I think we should add it to packman repository,
I'm building it in my home project as well and it is ready to be submitted
to pm repository.
I decided to build it because I noticed that xbmc needs this package in
order to support NFS.
I think this package should be part of Essentials repo and not Multimedia,
what do you think ?

Do we have any other package that requires libnfs? If no, imo, there is no
reason to put it in Essentials. But let PM geeks decide. Pascal, Manfred,
what's Your voice?
If there is no other package needing this right now, libnfs should be 
there where xmbc resides.


We can move it later to Essentials or even into openSUSE:Factory when 
there is a reason for that.


Herbert

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

[packman] x86-64 Factory builds

2012-03-29 Diskussionsfäden Cristian Morales Vega
Any idea about what's the problem with the x86-64 Factory builds? They
fail a lot with internal compiler error messages but the same build
works with every other distro, with the i586 Factory build and even
with the x86-64 Factory build in the main OBS. For an example see
http://pmbs.links2linux.org/package/show?package=mocproject=Multimedia
vs 
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=mocproject=home%3ARedDwarf:multimedia

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Re: [packman] x86-64 Factory builds

2012-03-29 Diskussionsfäden Markus Kohm
 Any idea about what's the problem with the x86-64 Factory builds? They
 fail a lot with internal compiler error messages

internal compiler errors are often memory problems while optimization.
Changing general optimization options, e.g.,-O3 into -O2, -Os or -O1, may
help. Better would be to find out the optimization that fails, and only
disabling that. Which optimizations are part of -O1, -O2, and -O3 may be
tested using e.g.

gcc -O3 -Q --help=optimizers

Markus

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

[packman] What's the plan for openSUSE 11.3?

2012-03-29 Diskussionsfäden Cristian Morales Vega
Seems clear that there is not going to be an Evergreen for 11.3. And
it has been failing because the repository points to
openSUSE.org:openSUSE:11.3 instead of
openSUSE.org:DISCONTINUED:openSUSE:11.3.
It reached EOL two months ago, so... Should it be deleted?

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman


Re: [packman] XBMC 11.0

2012-03-29 Diskussionsfäden Manfred Tremmel
Am Donnerstag, 29. März 2012, 02:15:47 schrieb Mariusz Fik:
 Dnia środa, 28 marca 2012 09:36:56 Sagi Ben-Akiva pisze:
  Hi all,
  
  sorry for not answering to your emails, but 2 days ago I, finally,
  decided to upgrade my PC to openSUSE 12.1.
  It took more than 24 hours to download ~2100 packages and now I
  can't login to my system (KDE crashes after login)
  but this is a different story.
  
  OK, so we will stay with xbmc as the package name.
  
  Regarding libnfs, yes I think we should add it to packman
  repository, I'm building it in my home project as well and it is
  ready to be submitted to pm repository.
  I decided to build it because I noticed that xbmc needs this
  package in order to support NFS.
  I think this package should be part of Essentials repo and not
  Multimedia, what do you think ?
 
 Do we have any other package that requires libnfs? If no, imo, there
 is no reason to put it in Essentials. But let PM geeks decide.
 Pascal, Manfred, what's Your voice?

As far as I know, non of my packages needs libnfs, so it would be ok to 
move it to Multimedia.

-- 
Machs gut| http://www.iivs.de/schwinde/buerger/tremmel/

Manfred  | http://packman.links2linux.de/

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman