[packman] Re : Re: Re : Is it possible to have a packman version for Tumbleweed for the Raspberry Pi 3/4 (aarch64)?
- Olaf Hering a écrit : > Am Tue, 1 Dec 2020 10:56:20 +0100 (CET) > schrieb Guillaume GARDET : > > > Any objections? > > The publisher may need adjustments, perhaps it has a fixed list of > architectures. No, currently mirrors take care of projects and repos only and that's why adding new architectures to openSUSE_Tumbleweed will just work, whereas nobody took care to add openSUSE_Factory_ARM in the past. > > It also means all 'openSUSE_Factory_ARM' *.repo files out there become > invalid. The published directory may stay on the mirrors, unless someone > removes it manually and the mirrors pickup this change. No, it is not part of the mirrors, which was the original reason for this change. Cheers, Guillaume > > A number of pkg's may need adjustment in case they have special handling for > a 'openSUSE_Factory_ARM' repository, but not for 'openSUSE_Tumbleweed' or > 'arch='. Each one should probably be reevaluated if such knob is still > justified. > > Olaf ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de https://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Re : Re: Re : Is it possible to have a packman version for Tumbleweed for the Raspberry Pi 3/4 (aarch64)?
- Luigi Baldoni a écrit : > Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2020 at 10:56 AM > From: "Guillaume GARDET" > > > > Packman build already for Arm (aarch64, armv7 and armv6). > > > > For Leap, Arm packages are built in the same repo and thus, are released > > under the same directories as x86. > > But for Tumbleweed, it currently uses different repo (openSUSE_Factory_ARM > > vs openSUSE_Tumbleweed for x86). > > So, we should redo the Packman setup to build Arm in openSUSE_Tumbleweed > > project as well. Any objections? > > Building for both Tumbleweed and Factory looks like a waste of resources, > which as I understand are strained as it is. It would a switch instead of additional builds. Once openSUSE_Tumbleweed looks ok, we could just drop openSUSE_Factory_ARM . Guillaume > > What's the rationale behind the request? > > Regards > > > ___ > Packman mailing list > Packman@links2linux.de > https://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de https://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
