[Paraview] Lookup table bug for the filter following a volume representation

2011-07-01 Thread Jérôme
Hi,

I submitted a bug related to Lookup table here :
http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12180

Basically, if you select a 'Volume' representation for a filter and plug
another filter, the new representation lookup table freezes to a default
red-to-purple scale.
Can anyboy tell me if this is reproducible elsewhere than on my system
(Linux, NVidia, PV-3.11.1 git-master)?

Thanks a lot
Jerome
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] Error with python calculator tutorial

2011-07-01 Thread David Partyka
Hi Jonathan, It looks like we missed installing lapack in the binary and the
machines we tested on likely already had it installed in the system. I'll
look into slipping the missing .so into the binary shortly.

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Jonathan Regele 
jonathan.reg...@caltech.edu wrote:

 **
 Hello,

 I've searched the web far and wide for an answer to this question, but
 can't find it. I'm running Ubuntu 10.04 and want to use the python
 calculator. I downloaded the paraview-3.10.1 binary and loaded paraview.
 When I follow the tutorial, create sphere assign the expression the value 5
 and apply it gives the following error.

   Traceback (most recent call last):
 File string, line 4, in module
 File
 /usr/local/ParaView-3.10.1-Linux-x86_64/lib/paraview-3.10/site-packages/paraview/vtk/dataset_adapter.py,
 line 5, in module
 sure that it is installed properly.)
 RuntimeError: This module depends on the numpy module. Please makesure that
 it is installed properly.


 I have python 2.6.5 installed on my computer but my understanding is that
 the binary comes with its own set of python. I checked and it looks like
 there is python 2.7 in the package directory. It also looks like it comes
 with its own version of numpy here


 /usr/local/ParaView-3.10.1-Linux-x86_64/lib/paraview-3.10/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/


 If I delete the python calculator and try it again I get a different error
 message:

   Traceback (most recent call last):
 File string, line 4, in module
 File
 /usr/local/ParaView-3.10.1-Linux-x86_64/lib/paraview-3.10/site-packages/paraview/vtk/dataset_adapter.py,
 line 2, in module
 import numpy
 File
 /usr/local/ParaView-3.10.1-Linux-x86_64/lib/paraview-3.10/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/__init__.py,
 line 136, in module
 import add_newdocs
 File
 /usr/local/ParaView-3.10.1-Linux-x86_64/lib/paraview-3.10/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/add_newdocs.py,
 line 9, in module
 from numpy.lib import add_newdoc
 File
 /usr/local/ParaView-3.10.1-Linux-x86_64/lib/paraview-3.10/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/lib/__init__.py,
 line 13, in module
 from polynomial import *
 File
 /usr/local/ParaView-3.10.1-Linux-x86_64/lib/paraview-3.10/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/lib/polynomial.py,
 line 11, in module
 import numpy.core.numeric as NX
 AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'core'


 It gives the same error after that. The error seems to occur when it tries
 to import numpy.

 In a linux terminal window, if I open python 2.6 and import numpy it
 doesn't give me any problems. If I open the python shell in paraview and try
 to import numpy I get the following output:

   Python 2.7.1 (r271:86832, Mar 17 2011, 09:15:47)
 [GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)] on linux2
  from paraview.simple import *
 paraview version 3.10.1, Date: 2011-01-28
  import numpy
 Traceback (most recent call last):
 File console, line 1, in module
 File
 /usr/local/ParaView-3.10.1-Linux-x86_64/lib/paraview-3.10/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/__init__.py,
 line 136, in module
 import add_newdocs
 File
 /usr/local/ParaView-3.10.1-Linux-x86_64/lib/paraview-3.10/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/add_newdocs.py,
 line 9, in module
 from numpy.lib import add_newdoc
 File
 /usr/local/ParaView-3.10.1-Linux-x86_64/lib/paraview-3.10/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/lib/__init__.py,
 line 13, in module
 from polynomial import *
 File
 /usr/local/ParaView-3.10.1-Linux-x86_64/lib/paraview-3.10/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/lib/polynomial.py,
 line 17, in module
 from numpy.linalg import eigvals, lstsq
 File
 /usr/local/ParaView-3.10.1-Linux-x86_64/lib/paraview-3.10/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/linalg/__init__.py,
 line 48, in module
 from linalg import *
 File
 /usr/local/ParaView-3.10.1-Linux-x86_64/lib/paraview-3.10/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/linalg/linalg.py,
 line 23, in module
 from numpy.linalg import lapack_lite
 ImportError: liblapack.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
 directory
 

   I've tried several things, but it just doesn't make any sense. Any
 ideas?

 Jonathan


 ___
 Powered by www.kitware.com

 Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
 http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

 Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
 http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

 Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
 http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] Lookup table bug for the filter following a volume representation

2011-07-01 Thread Utkarsh Ayachit
I was able to reproduce. Thanks for reporting.  I will take a look.

Utkarsh

On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Jérôme jerome.ve...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 I submitted a bug related to Lookup table here :
 http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12180

 Basically, if you select a 'Volume' representation for a filter and plug
 another filter, the new representation lookup table freezes to a default
 red-to-purple scale.
 Can anyboy tell me if this is reproducible elsewhere than on my system
 (Linux, NVidia, PV-3.11.1 git-master)?

 Thanks a lot
 Jerome


 ___
 Powered by www.kitware.com

 Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
 http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

 Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
 http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

 Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
 http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] FW: FW: Coloured isosurfaces when running MPI

2011-07-01 Thread Philipp Schlatter

Thanks!
The Compute Normals is checked in the contour filter after the  
CleanToGrid filter, however the Gouraud shading does not work. But using  
an additional Generate Surface Normals then does the trick, at least  
partially. The contours look nicer than without Gouraud shading,  
obviously, but the best result (and also the cheapest one, I will use it  
on large data sets) would still be obtained when directly doing a contour  
on the original rectilinear data without transforming it to unstructured.


Thus, I was wondering whether I should submit the present case also as a  
bug report, as I guess also other people might need coloured isosurfaces  
when running MPI?


Best regards,
Philipp

On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 15:53:18 +0200, pat marion pat.mar...@kitware.com  
wrote:



Hi Philipp,

You need to check the Compute Normals box on the properties panel of  
the
contour filter.  Alternatively, you can apply the Generate Surface  
Normals

to any polydata dataset to enable correct Gouraud shading.

Pat

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Philipp Schlatter  
pschl...@mech.kth.sewrote:



Thanks a lot for the help!
Concerning the suggested workaround, I have a follow-up question: How  
would
one get the Gouraud shading of the isocontours working? In my case I  
will
get properly coloured isocontours, but they seem to have uniform shade  
for

each triangle as opposed to an interpolated shade.

Thanks,
philipp


On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:34:34 +0200, Karl König kkoeni...@web.de wrote:

 Hi Philipp,


It seems you have hit a bug in the Contour filter occurring with  1
pvserver process and rectilinear grid input. I can reproduce the issue
you reported as such:

Load ParaView, connect to  1 pvserver processes
Open Data/RectGrid2.vtk (e.g. from git://vtk.org/VTKData.git)
Calculator filter, operation: coordsX,
   Result Array Name: Result, Apply
Contour filter, Contour by scalars, Compute Normals,
   Isosurface Value 0.5, Apply
Representation Surface, Color by Result

With 1 pvserver process the surface coloring is indeed a single smooth
gradient while with more than 1 pvserver process the gradient starts
anew at half the X range. If applying an additional Process ID  
Scalars

filter, one can confirm that the reset happens at a process boundary.

Converting the rectilinear grid to an unstructured grid prior to
applying the contour filter may serve as as a workaround. The filters
Clean to Grid, Tetrahedralize and Tesselate all do that trick
(they are listed with increasing memory footprint). So, I recommend
using Clean to Grid somewhere before applying the contour filter in
the parallel case.

Karl



Philipp Schlatter wrote, On 29.06.2011 11:50:


Hi!
Thanks for the answer. Let me give some comments to your questions:
- I am using the distributed 3.10.1 binaries (32 bit), and I tried it  
on

a Ubuntu 11.04 system (older dualcore T60p)
- I used now the sample dataset Data/RectGrid2.vtk. Using the  
calculator

operation CoordsX, I can reproduce the behaviour I was originally
describing. I simply use the Contour filter (Compute Scalars did not
change the behaviour). I have uploaded 3 more screenshots:


http://www.mech.kth.se/~**pschlatt/files/Screenshot3.pnghttp://www.mech.kth.se/%7Epschlatt/files/Screenshot3.png
is the intended result, obtained using a single core (no Auto-MPI  
etc.)


http://www.mech.kth.se/~**pschlatt/files/Screenshot2.pnghttp://www.mech.kth.se/%7Epschlatt/files/Screenshot2.png
is the result obtained with Auto-MPI, running on my two cores.

http://www.mech.kth.se/~**pschlatt/files/Screenshot1.pnghttp://www.mech.kth.se/%7Epschlatt/files/Screenshot1.png
is the result obtained with explicitly initiating paraview and  
pvserver

using a total of 16 MPI ranks.

I tried all/most of the rendering options (LOD etc.), however it did  
not

help. Also, I have run on 64 bit version at the computer centre (with
older versions though), and the same problem appears there too.

I am really puzzled by the fact that you could not reproduce the
problem. Could there be some setting that is for some reason wrong in  
my

setup?

Best regards,
Philipp


On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:36:25 +0200, Karl König kkoeni...@web.de  
wrote:


 Hi Philipp,


A couple of questions:
* Are you using the distributed 3.10.1 binaries or did you compile PV
3.10.1 from source yourself?
* Can you reproduce the behavior with the sample dataset
Data/RectGrid2.vtk (part of both git://vtk.org/VTKData.git and
http://www.paraview.org/files/**v3.10/ParaViewData-3.10.1.ziphttp://www.paraview.org/files/v3.10/ParaViewData-3.10.1.zip
)**? That's
also a Rectilinear Grid. Using the Calculator operation 1 +
coordsX*coordsY followed by a Contour filter with Compute Scalars
checked and 10 auto-chosen values, I got identical results with 1  
and 16

cores (using PV 3.10.1 Linux 64-bit binaries and Windows 64-bit
binaries, relying on Auto-MPI (Settings - Use Multi-Core) for  
the 16

core case)

Karl


Philipp Schlatter wrote, On 28.06.2011 17:50:


Dear 

Re: [Paraview] independent colorbar range in different views of same session?

2011-07-01 Thread David E DeMarle
Hello Emily,

ParaView tries to use the same color transfer function for each
variable in all views to ensure that one perceives the same value
wherever they see a particular color. I expect this is what is
happening here. What you might do then to get around this behavior is
to create a copy of your array and color by that array in one view or
the other.

The simplest way I can thing to do that is to use the calculator
filter.  First choose either point or cell alignment to find the array
you want, then set the calculator expression to be simply the name of
the array you are making a copy of. Optionally set the output name if
you don't want the copy to be called RESULT. Lastly choose the new
array as the one to color by in one of the two views.

hth,

David E DeMarle
Kitware, Inc.
RD Engineer
28 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
Phone: 518-371-3971 x109



On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Guzas, Emily L CIV NUWC NWPT
emily.gu...@navy.mil wrote:
 Hello,

 I am a ParaView newbie trying to visualize two different types of
 time-varying data (let's say density and pressure) for the same analysis in
 two separate views of the same session of ParaView.

 I have set up the two views, where view 1 has the pressure data turned on
 and view 2 has the density data turned on. I made a colorbar for each view,
 and have changed the colorbar title to pressure for view 1 and density for
 view 2. (To make these colorbars, I first clicked on the pressure data in
 the pipeline browser, then clicked on view 1, then created the colorbar for
 pressure; then I clicked on the density data in the pipeline browser, then
 clicked on view 2, then created the colorbar for density).

 However, when I try to change the scale of each colorbar so that it only
 spans its data, then the colorbar for the other data is automatically
 changed. Does anyone know how to set the colorbar ranges independently for
 each view (say 1e5-2e7 Pa for pressure, in view 1, and 1-1000 g/cc for
 density, in view 2)?

 Thanks,
 Emily
 ___
 Powered by www.kitware.com

 Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
 http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

 Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
 http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

 Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
 http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] independent colorbar range in different views of same session?

2011-07-01 Thread David E DeMarle
Hah Eric so there! :)

The calculator filter will do what you want. There are probably better
ways but the calculator will only take a minute to try.

David E DeMarle
Kitware, Inc.
RD Engineer
28 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
Phone: 518-371-3971 x109



On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Guzas, Emily L CIV NUWC NWPT
emily.gu...@navy.mil wrote:
 David and Eric,

 Thanks for the advice. Your responses have definitely helped me get closer
 to actually defining the problem more precisely.

 Here's some more background:
 Although I am working with two different attributes from the same analysis
 (pressure and fluidID), the exodusii converter that I'm using (written by
 someone else) only operates on one attribute at a time and defaults to
 calling this attribute resX in the *.exo file. So I run the converter
 twice on my data, once to get the pressure.exo file and once to get the
 fluidID.exo file, but yet both files have a common name, resX, for the
 data attribute that I'm interested in.

 In ParaView, I am coloring both views by resX, even though in view 1,
 resX represents pressure and in view 2, resX represents fluidID. See
 attached screenshot.

 So without having to get the exodusii converter fixed, is there a way to
 change the data name in ParaView from resX to something else, say
 pressure, so that I can color my two views by a different variable, which
 should probably fix my problem with the independent colorbar scales?

 Thanks!

 -Emily

 ---
 Emily L. Guzas, Ph.D.
 Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Division Newport
 Analysis and Technology Branch, Code 4121
 Phone: 401.832.5577
 Email: emily.gu...@navy.mil

 This signature line and my digital signature is the equivalent of a hard
 copy signature, serving to authenticate that I have the authority to send
 this e-mail and to indicate I have consciously decided that it should have
 the same legal authority normally accorded to an actual hard copy signature.

 
 From: Eric E. Monson
 Sent: Fri 7/1/2011 1:56 PM
 To: Guzas, Emily L CIV NUWC NWPT
 Cc: David E DeMarle; Paraview Mailing list (to use with ec-nantes)
 Subject: Re: [Paraview] independent colorbar range in different views of
 same session?

 Hey,

 David, Emily seems to be describing that she already has two different
 attributes, so I'm suspecting that somehow she's mistakenly coloring by the
 same attribute in both views...

 Emily, as David is saying, (at least my understanding of) what you're
 wanting should be the default behavior. Make sure that when you click on
 each view the color by combo box changes which attribute it's listing, and
 that each colormap has Automatically Rescale to Fit Data Range checked in
 the colormap editor.

 Attached is a screen shot that I made right out of the box with all
 default settings, just having the surface colored by different attributes in
 different windows, and choosing an alternative to the blue-white-red
 colormap for Elevation.

 If you're still having trouble, maybe let us know which version of ParaView
 you're using, and on which platform, and whether you built it yourself.

 -Eric


___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] independent colorbar range in different views of same session?

2011-07-01 Thread Guzas, Emily L CIV NUWC NWPT
Thanks guys! The calculator filter does work.

Kudos to both Eric and David for making me understand the actual problem I was 
having, and then for giving me a solution.

Cheers,
Emily




From: David E DeMarle
Sent: Fri 7/1/2011 2:35 PM
To: Guzas, Emily L CIV NUWC NWPT
Cc: Eric E. Monson; Paraview Mailing list (to use with ec-nantes)
Subject: Re: [Paraview] independent colorbar range in different views of same 
session?


Hah Eric so there! :)

The calculator filter will do what you want. There are probably better
ways but the calculator will only take a minute to try.

David E DeMarle
Kitware, Inc.
RD Engineer
28 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
Phone: 518-371-3971 x109



On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Guzas, Emily L CIV NUWC NWPT
emily.gu...@navy.mil wrote:
 David and Eric,

 Thanks for the advice. Your responses have definitely helped me get closer
 to actually defining the problem more precisely.

 Here's some more background:
 Although I am working with two different attributes from the same analysis
 (pressure and fluidID), the exodusii converter that I'm using (written by
 someone else) only operates on one attribute at a time and defaults to
 calling this attribute resX in the *.exo file. So I run the converter
 twice on my data, once to get the pressure.exo file and once to get the
 fluidID.exo file, but yet both files have a common name, resX, for the
 data attribute that I'm interested in.

 In ParaView, I am coloring both views by resX, even though in view 1,
 resX represents pressure and in view 2, resX represents fluidID. See
 attached screenshot.

 So without having to get the exodusii converter fixed, is there a way to
 change the data name in ParaView from resX to something else, say
 pressure, so that I can color my two views by a different variable, which
 should probably fix my problem with the independent colorbar scales?

 Thanks!

 -Emily

 ---
 Emily L. Guzas, Ph.D.
 Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Division Newport
 Analysis and Technology Branch, Code 4121
 Phone: 401.832.5577
 Email: emily.gu...@navy.mil

 This signature line and my digital signature is the equivalent of a hard
 copy signature, serving to authenticate that I have the authority to send
 this e-mail and to indicate I have consciously decided that it should have
 the same legal authority normally accorded to an actual hard copy signature.

 
 From: Eric E. Monson
 Sent: Fri 7/1/2011 1:56 PM
 To: Guzas, Emily L CIV NUWC NWPT
 Cc: David E DeMarle; Paraview Mailing list (to use with ec-nantes)
 Subject: Re: [Paraview] independent colorbar range in different views of
 same session?

 Hey,

 David, Emily seems to be describing that she already has two different
 attributes, so I'm suspecting that somehow she's mistakenly coloring by the
 same attribute in both views...

 Emily, as David is saying, (at least my understanding of) what you're
 wanting should be the default behavior. Make sure that when you click on
 each view the color by combo box changes which attribute it's listing, and
 that each colormap has Automatically Rescale to Fit Data Range checked in
 the colormap editor.

 Attached is a screen shot that I made right out of the box with all
 default settings, just having the surface colored by different attributes in
 different windows, and choosing an alternative to the blue-white-red
 colormap for Elevation.

 If you're still having trouble, maybe let us know which version of ParaView
 you're using, and on which platform, and whether you built it yourself.

 -Eric




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


[Paraview] OSMesa Desired GL includes not used

2011-07-01 Thread Kevin H. Hobbs
When I build ParaView with OSMesa only GL/gl.h is not found.

My build of mesa is installed in /home/kevin/mesa_osmesa.

The system mesa headers are not installed.

At the end of this e-mail, is the tail of the output of a verbose
build There is no -I/home/kevin/mesa_osmesa to be found.

If I install the system mesa-libGL-devel package ( required for
qt-devel which I need for my mesa-xlib build ) the build
succedes, so Paraview is not using the gl.h associated with the
OSMesa library.


[ 86%] Building CXX object
ParaViewCore/ClientServerCore/CMakeFiles/vtkPVClientServerCore.dir/vtkIceTSynchronizedRenderers.cxx.o
cd
/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/ParaViewCore/ClientServerCore
 /usr/lib64/ccache/c++   -DvtkPVClientServerCore_EXPORTS
-DVTK_PYTHON_BUILD -DMPICH_IGNORE_CXX_SEEK -D_HPUX_SOURCE
-Wno-deprecated -O3 -DNDEBUG -fPIC
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/ParaViewCore/ClientServerCore
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/VTK/Utilities
-I/usr/include/python2.7
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/Utilities/IceT/src/include
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/Utilities/IceT/src/include
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/Utilities/VTKPythonWrapping/Executable
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/ParaViewCore/Common
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/ParaViewCore/Common
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/ParaViewCore/VTKExtensions
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/ParaViewCore/VTKExtensions
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/ParaViewCore/ClientServerCore
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/VTK
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/VTK
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/VTK/Utilities
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/VTK/Wrapping
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/VTK/Wrapping
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/VTK/Wrapping/Python
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/VTK/Wrapping/Python
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/VTK/Common
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/VTK/Common
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/VTK/Charts
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/VTK/Charts
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/VTK/Filtering
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/VTK/Filtering
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/VTK/GenericFiltering
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/VTK/GenericFiltering
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/VTK/IO
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/VTK/IO
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/VTK/Imaging
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/VTK/Imaging
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/VTK/Rendering
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/VTK/Rendering
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/VTK/Parallel
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/VTK/Parallel
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/VTK/Graphics
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/VTK/Graphics
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/VTK/Hybrid
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/VTK/Hybrid
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/VTK/VolumeRendering
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/VTK/VolumeRendering
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/VTK/Widgets
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/VTK/Widgets
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/VTK/Infovis
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/VTK/Infovis
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/VTK/Views
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/VTK/Views
-I/usr/include/openmpi-x86_64
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/Utilities/VTKClientServer
-I/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/Utilities/VTKClientServer   
-o
CMakeFiles/vtkPVClientServerCore.dir/vtkIceTSynchronizedRenderers.cxx.o
-c
/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/ParaViewCore/ClientServerCore/vtkIceTSynchronizedRenderers.cxx
In file included from
/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build/VTK/Rendering/vtkgl.h:22:0,
 from
/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/ParaViewCore/ClientServerCore/vtkIceTSynchronizedRenderers.cxx:33:
/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView/VTK/Rendering/vtkOpenGL.h:26:43:
fatal error: GL/gl.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make[2]: ***
[ParaViewCore/ClientServerCore/CMakeFiles/vtkPVClientServerCore.dir/vtkIceTSynchronizedRenderers.cxx.o]
Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build'
make[1]: ***
[ParaViewCore/ClientServerCore/CMakeFiles/vtkPVClientServerCore.dir/all]
Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView_OSMesa_Build'
make: *** [all] Error 2



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


[Paraview] Weird boost error during ccmake

2011-07-01 Thread Cook, Rich
I got this error.  I hope it's obvious why I think it's weird.  I'm building 
against boost 1.46.  Or thought I was.  This message seems to imply it's 
looking at the system boost in /usr/include/boost

 Your system is using an outdated version of Boost (1.33.1, found in
 /nfs/tmp2/rcook/ParaView/3.10/build/boost_1_46_1).  Some of the graph
 processing filters require version 1.36.0 or later to build on 64-bit
 platforms.


-- 
✐Richard Cook   
✇ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Bldg-453 Rm-4024, Mail Stop L-557
7000 East Avenue,  Livermore, CA, 94550, USA
☎ (office) (925) 423-9605
☎ (fax) (925) 423-6961
---
Information Management  Graphics Grp., Services  Development Div., Integrated 
Computing  Communications Dept.
(opinions expressed herein are mine and not those of LLNL)



___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview