Easy CD DA Extractor Version 9.1.1 Build 4 is Available
Easy CD DA Extractor version 9.1.1 build 4 is now available from www.poikosoft.com. Here are the changes in this version: Workaround: Fixed the problem where Easy CD-DA Extractor would disappear or crash with Access Violation message. The problem was caused by the driver software installed by 'DVD Region+CSS Free', 'DVDFab Platinum' , and 'DVDIdle' . (these programs install a filter driver that handles the MMC command 'Read TOC' wrong and accesses wrong memory locations) Regards Steve Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: steve1963 MSN Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: gold wave can't move finish marker
How do you determine that they don't move? Bruce -- Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God. John 1:12 NIV Bruce Toews E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com On Fri, 26 May 2006, HF wrote: > I do, but they don't move. > HF > - Original Message - > From: "Rick Harmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 4:45 PM > Subject: Re: gold wave can't move finish marker > > >> Hi, >> >> use control + left shift keys with the left and right cursor keys to move >> the finish marker. >> >> Rick >> >> >> === >> >> Contact Information: >> >> Skype ID: rharmon928 >> MSN ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Phone: 330-724-6093 >> Location: Akron, Ohio USA >> >> Visit my new mailing list on www.freelists.org >> >> blind_geek_zone >> >> >> "The chief handicap of the blind is not blindness, but the attitude of >> seeing people towards them." >> - Helen Keller, 1925 >> >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "HF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 4:39 PM >> Subject: Re: gold wave can't move finish marker >> >> >> Hi Ron >> They don't move at all for me. They stay in the same place. I could move >> the >> start markerwithout a problem, but not the end marker. >> >> HF >> - Original Message - >> From: "Ron Winstanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:40 PM >> Subject: Re: gold wave can't move finish marker >> >> >>> Hello >>> I'm not sure of the difference between end markers and finish markers, >>> but >>> holding down left shift and left control while pressing the left or right >>> cursor keys will move the marker accordingly. Also, the right bracket key >>> will place the marker at the current position in the file. >>> Ron >>> - Original Message - >>> From: HF >>> To: PC audio discussion list. >>> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:55 PM >>> Subject: gold wave can't move finish marker >>> >>> >>> Any ideas, I cannot move the finish marker in either direction. I can >>> though, move the start marker without a problem. >>> Is there a setting that I should be awhere of? >>> >>> HF >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >>> http://www.pc-audio.org >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >>> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com >>> ___ >>> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >>> http://www.pc-audio.org >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >>> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com >> >> >> ___ >> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >> http://www.pc-audio.org >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com >> >> >> ___ >> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >> http://www.pc-audio.org >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: headphones with sound card
I'm hoping we can do this with various adaptors. I just hope the monitor output from the card has a high enough signal to drive headphones properly. - Original Message - From: "Lois Goodine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 3:11 PM Subject: Re: headphones with sound card > Can he attach a y connector that would plug into the analog output line > and > have two female connectors that would accommodate the headphones and > whatever else might be desired? You can do a work around with various > connectors. > Lois Goodine. > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: Soundforge Tutorial Availability
Hi! I was really stressed last night, so I'm sorry if I spazed. I actually have a copy that I got for free too, and I'll gladly share it with you. Allison - Original Message - From: "Jardata Mail Services" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 9:10 PM Subject: Soundforge Tutorial Availability > Hello Allison! > > My asking for the availability of the Soundforge tutorial was not to get > it free. If you remember, I asked about its availability from the FS web > site. Of course, I would be grateful to anyone who could provide me with > a free copy of it. If it is no longer being sold by its rightful owner, > then the owner probably would not mind if it is shared by someone who > actually owns one. I would never try to hoodwink my buddy Jonathan out of > commission. > > James Robinson > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Soundforge Tutorial Availability
Hello Allison! My asking for the availability of the Soundforge tutorial was not to get it free. If you remember, I asked about its availability from the FS web site. Of course, I would be grateful to anyone who could provide me with a free copy of it. If it is no longer being sold by its rightful owner, then the owner probably would not mind if it is shared by someone who actually owns one. I would never try to hoodwink my buddy Jonathan out of commission. James Robinson ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: M4A Files
Hi, I installed the latest version of WinAmp. It does support M4A files, but I couldn't get the file I got from the podcast to play. Guess it must be a Mac-oriented podcast. Oh well, at least I tried. Thanks. Yours Sincerely, Kelly John Sapergia For a mix of New Age, Ambient, Easy Listening, Smooth Jazz and Global Fusion music, listen to "Northern Lights", Thursdays from 01:00 to 03:00 GMT (Wednesdays in North America) on ACB (American Council of the Blind) Radio Interactive at http://interactive.acbradio.org Visit the show's web site at http://www.ksapergia.net/northernlights.html For high-quality audio productions at affordable prices, visit KJS Productions at: http://www.kjsproductions.com You can also visit my personal web site at: http://www.ksapergia.net ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: Can not move start mrker backwords.
Hi, Yes use shift and the right arrow to move the start marker backwards. Rick === Contact Information: Skype ID: rharmon928 MSN ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 330-724-6093 Location: Akron, Ohio USA Visit my new mailing list on www.freelists.org blind_geek_zone "The chief handicap of the blind is not blindness, but the attitude of seeing people towards them." - Helen Keller, 1925 - Original Message - From: "Anders Holmberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 4:13 PM Subject: Can not move start mrker backwords. HellO! I tries to move my start marker backwards abit but it seems to not work. Shall i use shift and the left arrow or was it only the left arrow? I cant remember. /Anders. ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
Or because it was a form of square wave which cannot be handled by noise reduction. - Original Message - From: "Rick Harmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 2:07 PM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > Hi, > > The under water sound you here is because you set the level of noise > reduction at too high a level. > > Rick > > > === > > Contact Information: > > Skype ID: rharmon928 > MSN ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Phone: 330-724-6093 > Location: Akron, Ohio USA > > Visit my new mailing list on www.freelists.org > > blind_geek_zone > > > "The chief handicap of the blind is not blindness, but the attitude of > seeing people towards them." > - Helen Keller, 1925 > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Gary Petraccaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 1:59 PM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > > Doesn't prove anything except that you can't use it to do what you want. > You need more of a sample than that. > > - Original Message - > From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 11:00 AM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > >> Yeah, I used it a few times on some TV audio I record with my tuner, it >> sort >> of adds an under water sound to things. >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Gary Schindler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 9:16 AM >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >> >> >>>I agree with your assessment. the noise reduction in goldwave does a >>>lousy >>> job when you use noise from the clipboard. >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 12:08 AM >>> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> >>> Maybe a better way of saying it is to say that in my opinion I do not feel that I can get as polished a finished product with Goldwave as I can with SoundForge without a lot more work, and a whole lot less flexability. And, the Goldwave noise reduction that is built-in is no place as good as the noise reduction in SoundForge. - Original Message - From: "Gary Schindler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:12 AM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge :I think you can get good broadcast quality from goldwave, but the program is : awkward to work with when you are in a hurry. : : - Original Message - : From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : To: "PC audio discussion list. " : Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:07 AM : Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge : : : >I guess I wouldn't be as concerned about how small a piece as I am things : >like the equalizer, noise reduction, click and crackle features, : >compression, and mixing choices. But, that doesn't mean that my needs are : >the same as everybody else on this list. So, at the very least a person : >should be compairing Goldwave to at least one other sound editor in a price : >range that they can afford. And, I would be willing to bet that Goldwave : >will be fine for 80 percent or more of persons who are not concerned with : >getting broadcast quality for every file they edit. : > : > : > : > - Original Message - : > From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > To: "PC audio discussion list. " : > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:59 PM : > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge : > : > : > : With GW you can edit to within a thousandth of a second or finer. How : > much : > : finer do you want than that? : > : : > : Bruce : > : : > : -- : > : Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he : > : gave the right to become children of God. John 1:12 NIV : > : : > : Bruce Toews : > : E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : > : Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net : > : Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net : > : Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com : > : : > : On Thu, 25 May 2006, Gary Schindler wrote: : > : : > : > the only thing I wish that goldwave could do is to be a more precise : > or : > : > finer editor. you can't beat soundforges editing capabilities at any : > price. : > : > : > : > - Original Message - : > : > From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > : > To: "PC audio discussion list. " : > : > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:
Re: headphones with sound card
Can he attach a y connector that would plug into the analog output line and have two female connectors that would accommodate the headphones and whatever else might be desired? You can do a work around with various connectors. Lois Goodine. ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
headphones with sound card
A friend just got a new computer with aan M-Audio Audiophile sound card. It has no headphone jack. How can he hook up his phones? The analog outputs of the card are on a breakout cable and ar all quarter inch mono. ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Can not move start mrker backwords.
HellO! I tries to move my start marker backwards abit but it seems to not work. Shall i use shift and the left arrow or was it only the left arrow? I cant remember. /Anders. ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
Hi, The under water sound you here is because you set the level of noise reduction at too high a level. Rick === Contact Information: Skype ID: rharmon928 MSN ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 330-724-6093 Location: Akron, Ohio USA Visit my new mailing list on www.freelists.org blind_geek_zone "The chief handicap of the blind is not blindness, but the attitude of seeing people towards them." - Helen Keller, 1925 - Original Message - From: "Gary Petraccaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 1:59 PM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge Doesn't prove anything except that you can't use it to do what you want. You need more of a sample than that. - Original Message - From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 11:00 AM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > Yeah, I used it a few times on some TV audio I record with my tuner, it > sort > of adds an under water sound to things. > > - Original Message - > From: "Gary Schindler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 9:16 AM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > >>I agree with your assessment. the noise reduction in goldwave does a >>lousy >> job when you use noise from the clipboard. >> - Original Message - >> From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 12:08 AM >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >> >> >>> Maybe a better way of saying it is to say that in my opinion I do not >>> feel >>> that I can get as polished a finished product with Goldwave as I can >>> with >>> SoundForge without a lot more work, and a whole lot less flexability. >>> And, the Goldwave noise reduction that is built-in is no place as good >>> as >>> the noise reduction in SoundForge. >>> >>> >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Gary Schindler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:12 AM >>> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> >>> >>> :I think you can get good broadcast quality from goldwave, but the >>> program >>> is >>> : awkward to work with when you are in a hurry. >>> : >>> : - Original Message - >>> : From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> : To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> : Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:07 AM >>> : Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> : >>> : >>> : >I guess I wouldn't be as concerned about how small a piece as I am >>> things >>> : >like the equalizer, noise reduction, click and crackle features, >>> : >compression, and mixing choices. But, that doesn't mean that my >>> needs >>> are >>> : >the same as everybody else on this list. So, at the very least a >>> person >>> : >should be compairing Goldwave to at least one other sound editor in a >>> price >>> : >range that they can afford. And, I would be willing to bet that >>> Goldwave >>> : >will be fine for 80 percent or more of persons who are not concerned >>> with >>> : >getting broadcast quality for every file they edit. >>> : > >>> : > >>> : > >>> : > - Original Message - >>> : > From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> : > To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> : > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:59 PM >>> : > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> : > >>> : > >>> : > : With GW you can edit to within a thousandth of a second or finer. >>> How >>> : > much >>> : > : finer do you want than that? >>> : > : >>> : > : Bruce >>> : > : >>> : > : -- >>> : > : Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he >>> : > : gave the right to become children of God. John 1:12 NIV >>> : > : >>> : > : Bruce Toews >>> : > : E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> : > : Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net >>> : > : Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): >>> http://www.ogts.net >>> : > : Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com >>> : > : >>> : > : On Thu, 25 May 2006, Gary Schindler wrote: >>> : > : >>> : > : > the only thing I wish that goldwave could do is to be a more >>> precise >>> : > or >>> : > : > finer editor. you can't beat soundforges editing capabilities at >>> any >>> : > price. >>> : > : > >>> : > : > - Original Message - >>> : > : > From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> : > : > To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> : > : > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:29 AM >>> : > : > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> : > : > >>> : > : > >>> : > : >> Some people say, "You get what you pay for!" But actually, you >>> have >>> : > to >>> : > : >> take >>> : > : >> a lot of things into consideration when purchasing a sound >>> editor! >>> : > What >>> : > : >> features and abilities you want with a sound editor, and also, >>> what >>> : > you >>> : > : >> can >>> : > : >> afford! >>> : > : >> - Original Message
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
Doesn't prove anything except that you can't use it to do what you want. You need more of a sample than that. - Original Message - From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 11:00 AM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > Yeah, I used it a few times on some TV audio I record with my tuner, it > sort > of adds an under water sound to things. > > - Original Message - > From: "Gary Schindler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 9:16 AM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > >>I agree with your assessment. the noise reduction in goldwave does a >>lousy >> job when you use noise from the clipboard. >> - Original Message - >> From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 12:08 AM >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >> >> >>> Maybe a better way of saying it is to say that in my opinion I do not >>> feel >>> that I can get as polished a finished product with Goldwave as I can >>> with >>> SoundForge without a lot more work, and a whole lot less flexability. >>> And, the Goldwave noise reduction that is built-in is no place as good >>> as >>> the noise reduction in SoundForge. >>> >>> >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Gary Schindler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:12 AM >>> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> >>> >>> :I think you can get good broadcast quality from goldwave, but the >>> program >>> is >>> : awkward to work with when you are in a hurry. >>> : >>> : - Original Message - >>> : From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> : To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> : Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:07 AM >>> : Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> : >>> : >>> : >I guess I wouldn't be as concerned about how small a piece as I am >>> things >>> : >like the equalizer, noise reduction, click and crackle features, >>> : >compression, and mixing choices. But, that doesn't mean that my >>> needs >>> are >>> : >the same as everybody else on this list. So, at the very least a >>> person >>> : >should be compairing Goldwave to at least one other sound editor in a >>> price >>> : >range that they can afford. And, I would be willing to bet that >>> Goldwave >>> : >will be fine for 80 percent or more of persons who are not concerned >>> with >>> : >getting broadcast quality for every file they edit. >>> : > >>> : > >>> : > >>> : > - Original Message - >>> : > From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> : > To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> : > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:59 PM >>> : > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> : > >>> : > >>> : > : With GW you can edit to within a thousandth of a second or finer. >>> How >>> : > much >>> : > : finer do you want than that? >>> : > : >>> : > : Bruce >>> : > : >>> : > : -- >>> : > : Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he >>> : > : gave the right to become children of God. John 1:12 NIV >>> : > : >>> : > : Bruce Toews >>> : > : E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> : > : Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net >>> : > : Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): >>> http://www.ogts.net >>> : > : Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com >>> : > : >>> : > : On Thu, 25 May 2006, Gary Schindler wrote: >>> : > : >>> : > : > the only thing I wish that goldwave could do is to be a more >>> precise >>> : > or >>> : > : > finer editor. you can't beat soundforges editing capabilities at >>> any >>> : > price. >>> : > : > >>> : > : > - Original Message - >>> : > : > From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> : > : > To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> : > : > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:29 AM >>> : > : > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> : > : > >>> : > : > >>> : > : >> Some people say, "You get what you pay for!" But actually, you >>> have >>> : > to >>> : > : >> take >>> : > : >> a lot of things into consideration when purchasing a sound >>> editor! >>> : > What >>> : > : >> features and abilities you want with a sound editor, and also, >>> what >>> : > you >>> : > : >> can >>> : > : >> afford! >>> : > : >> - Original Message - >>> : > : >> From: "Brian Olesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> : > : >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> : > : >> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 3:42 PM >>> : > : >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> : > : >> >>> : > : >> >>> : > : >>> HI, >>> : > : >>> But it's also pretty expensive. >>> : > : >>> >>> : > : >>> Best regards >>> : > : >>> Brian >>> : > : >>> - Original Message - >>> : > : >>> From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> : > : >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> : > : >>> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 5:38 PM >>> : > : >>> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> : > : >>> >>> : > :
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
If I understand what you mean, you don't need it in 6, either. However, you do have to set cue to on. - Original Message - From: "Jerry Richer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 10:33 AM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > Daveed! If scrubbing in Sound Forge is important to you for your work > then you probably should upgrade to 8.0. You don't need scripts to scrub > in > 8.0. > > Jerry > > Chirp|Chirp|Chirp: It's the Bat, Chirping Bat .Com > ! Edirol R-09: $359.00, includes delivery within the USA, add $30 outside > ! DEC-TALK USB: $650.00, includes delivery in the USA, add $30 outside, > www.chirpingbat.com/dectalkusb.shtml > ! Gyration RF Wireless 100 foot range keyboard: $199.00, includes delivery > within the USA, add $30 outside, www.chirpingbat.com/rfkeyboard.shtml > ! J-Say without Naturally Speaking: Standard $345.00, Professional > $575.00, > www.chirpingbat.com/j-say.shtml > ! Window Eyes 5.5: $700, includes delivery in the USA, > www.ChirpingBat.Com/windoweyes.shtml > ! Triple Talk: USB $450, PCI $350, includes delivery within the USA, add > $30 > outside, www.ChirpingBat.Com/tripletalk.shtml > ! Sound Forge 8.0 with CD Architect 5.2 and Noise Reduction 2.0: $225, > includes delivery within the USA, add $30 outside, > www.ChirpingBat.Com/soundforge.shtml > ! We accept PayPal All Major Credit Cards, money orders, checks, wire > transfers, etc. > We ship Internationally. Click to convert our prices into your currency > at: > www.xe.com/ucc/full.shtml > > Reach BA Software in the United States at: > Phone: 1-518-572-6092 weekdays, 1-518-359-8538 other, Email: > [EMAIL PROTECTED], Skype name adirondackbat, WWW: www.ChirpingBat.Com > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: broadcasting question
I say Jack is better taken to the web or sat radio where people would want nothing but music and a few messages. Music choice is OK, but that's TV audio that isn't that great, really. - Original Message - From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 10:21 AM Subject: Re: broadcasting question >I have worked in the broadcast industry for over thirty years and have > always maintained that live and local is the best. Although we often like > to > go abroad and explore and want to find out what is going on around the > world > we usually come back home to explore our local roots looking for > information > in regards to what is going on in our home community. > Is there a baseball tournament taking place tonight at our local community > baseball field? > Is it going to rain today? What is in the long-range forecast for the next > three days? > The thing here is that live and local programming costs money, and the big > boys of broadcasting are, for the most part not willing to fork out the > bucks to pay for this talent. They want the easy way out, and that is > simply > by playing gobs of music. I am not against music, but feel that a healthy > balance of local and relevant information and a good blend of music has to > be reached. Radio has personality, and we should strive to get that point > across to our listeners. What annoys me the most are those classic lines, > such as: "just around the corner we are going to hear from the Beatles." > Exactly what do they mean by saying just around the corner? You hear these > lines on just about every station. This tells me that stations are copping > one another in order to get audience share. The Jack format is yet another > bug a boo with me as well. I am afraid that the Jack format has warn out > it's welcome. You can only use those canned messages for so long and the > audience gets tired of them, and will simply move on to another radio > station that has intelligent programming. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Tate Luck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'PC audio discussion list. '" > Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 8:41 AM > Subject: RE: broadcasting question > > >>I have both satellite services. >> I believe you can have 300 stations and unless you are relevant know one >> will care for very long. >> >> Most stations are music services and hear lies the problem. >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> On Behalf Of Bob Seed >> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 12:40 AM >> To: PC audio discussion list. >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> I think that before the end of the year I will be going that way as well. >> Do >> >> not like terrestrial radio. >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 11:26 PM >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> >>> That's one reason I stick with my XMPCR device. Not portable, but with >>> an >>> FM >>> transmitter I can hear it around the house. I do like being able to read >>> the >>> text of all the channels. >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 8:03 PM >>> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >>> >>> I don't think that it will be too long before a talking receiver will be available. To me it would be nothing more than converting the text information on the screen to speech. - Original Message - From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 6:48 PM Subject: Re: broadcasting question > That's the thing I hate about XM is not knowing what that song was > they > just > played on a channel I like. > > - Original Message - > From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 4:22 PM > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > >> The problem with DAB is that nobody can agree to a Northamerican >> standard. >> We all know what happened to AM stereo. The consumer will ultimately >> determine whether DAB is going to take off or not. I honestly can't >> see >> people running out to buy new receivers. What you will see is that >> there >> will be a move to the FM band with all stations gradually converting >> over >> to DAB. There will be no need for announcers on a fulltime bases, as >> song >> title, artist, and other information will be displayed on a screen in >> much >> the same format as is being used with XM and Sirious. I can see >> commercial >> content going this way as well, as many of us see commercials as an >> intrusion as apposed to providing a service Talk radio will survive, >> but >>
Re: broadcasting question
Well, the audio quality of XM needs to increase to compete as that is part of what we're paying for. The other part is the commercial free nature of it but I heard an office depot commercial on channel 22 the other day. I sort of expected this because it is one of the Clear Channel-provided stations on XM. It was literally music, a jingle, and a single commercial before normal programming came back. That isn't real bad but CC probably just hasn't built up enough spots for 5 minutes of ads yet. - Original Message - From: "Tate Luck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'PC audio discussion list. '" Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 7:29 AM Subject: RE: broadcasting question > The bullet for FM is multi-channel. When Fm can have two to eight stations > on one frequency and it is free, XM and friends will not be such a great > idea. > > The radios are coming down, you will be able to get one for 75 buks in the > next year. > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Bob Seed > Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 12:38 AM > To: PC audio discussion list. > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > That is to say if we can get everyone on the same page, and workout a > standard that will make everyone happy. > - Original Message - > From: "Dave Marthouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 11:27 PM > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > >> In my opinion fm iboc will do well as receiver prices come down and >> multi-channel capability comes to pass. I think you hit the nail on the >> head regarding am iboc. In the future things may get better on the am >> front >> when the hybrid am iboc will be replaced by full digital. I think the >> total >> digital conversion will take ten or more years. >> >> >> Dave Marthouse >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 11:12 PM >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> >>> The question though, is whey stations are doing it who are analog and >>> have >>> no plans for IBOC in the near future. From what most engineers tell me >>> who >>> don't work for CC or NPR, AM IBOC is a real bad deal for AM audio and >>> the >>> IBOC audio sounds like a bad Windows Media feed, but there has been too >> much >>> money invested by NPR and Clear Channel to turn back now. >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Dave Marthouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 3:30 PM >>> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >>> >>> >>> > The reason why lots of am stations are tailoring their audio response >>> > to >>> > 5KHZ is to make room for the IBOC signal. IBOC is in band on channel >>> > digital audio broadcasting. The current hybrid form of IBOC being >>> > used >> in >>> > the united states takes up the sidebands above the 5KHZ bandwidth. >>> > >>> > >>> > Dave Marthouse >>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > - Original Message - >>> > From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 3:00 PM >>> > Subject: Re: broadcasting question >>> > >>> > >>> >> Yes, that's true. But in most cases, they already had the audio >> response >>> >> necessary. They already had good response before the made it 5KHZ. >>> >> - Original Message - >>> >> From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> >> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 2:50 PM >>> >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> > The frequency response on AM radio isn't that good to begin with, >>> >> > and >>> >> > it >>> >> > is >>> >> > certainly not worth spending the money to enhance the audio. The >>> > thinking >>> >> > here is to produce a signal that has a flat response and leave the >>> >> > other >>> >> > adjustments to the listener. However on FM it is a different >>> >> > story. >>> >> > Audio processing can now be done remotely from the desktop, and can >> be >>> >> > adjusted to fit a number of different formats. >>> >> > - Original Message - >>> >> > From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> >> > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 2:33 PM >>> >> > Subject: Re: broadcasting question >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> >> Yes, an engineer told me that he set his station audio for 6KHZ >> audio >>> > and >>> >> >> he >>> >> >> runs an analog station which touts music. Go figure. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> - Original Message - >>> >> >> From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> >> >> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 12:40 PM >>> >> >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> Well, AM is almost as low quality sounding as the telephone but >>> >> >>> it >>> >> >>> has >>> > a >>>
Re: M4A Files
Is it true though that Winamp 5.x won't do stuff that 2.x did? I know someone told me not to upgrade because of a whole bunch of DRM stuff that makes it so you can't play or do certain things that are possible in 2.x. Exactly what that is I'm not sure. - Original Message - From: "Sun Sparkle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 6:31 AM Subject: Re: M4A Files > kelly > the latest version ofwinamp, doesn't seem to have those problems, in a > way > winamp has grown, in its feature list, and the things it can do. theonly, > thing i wish is that the library support would be back. like it was, in > the > eariler versions of the program. > - Original Message - > From: "Kelly Sapergia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 12:23 AM > Subject: Re: M4A Files > > >> Hi Nick, >>Thanks for the suggestion. While I don't mind upgrading to a newer >> version of the program, I was experiencing playlist problems when using >> version 5.08 and 5.09 while broadcasting. I suspect the problem had >> something to do with the Extended Jump to File plugin, but I'm not taking >> any chances. >>Thanks again. >> >> >> Yours Sincerely, >> Kelly John Sapergia >> For a mix of New Age, Ambient, Easy Listening, Smooth Jazz and Global >> Fusion music, listen to "Northern Lights", Thursdays from 01:00 to 03:00 >> GMT (Wednesdays in North America) on ACB (American Council of the Blind) >> Radio Interactive at http://interactive.acbradio.org >> Visit the show's web site at http://www.ksapergia.net/northernlights.html >> For high-quality audio productions at affordable prices, visit KJS >> Productions at: http://www.kjsproductions.com >> You can also visit my personal web site at: >> http://www.ksapergia.net >> >> >> ___ >> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >> http://www.pc-audio.org >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com >> >> > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: broadcasting question
i know! - Original Message - From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 8:25 AM Subject: Re: broadcasting question > Three thousand songs are nothing! The average MP3 player holds about 6000 > songs and the songs have no anoying commercials in between. > - Original Message - > From: "michael Babcock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 10:59 AM > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > >> the local radio station said they have a max of 3000 songs at a time, i >> told >> him i have more songs that always! >> - Original Message - >> From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 8:20 PM >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> >>> It is possible that they may have some live programming in prime time, >>> but >>> I >>> would venture to say that in off hours it is 100% automation. When it is >>> raining cats and dogs and the announcer says that it is bright and sunny >>> you >>> know damn well that the station is on automatic pilot. Not good >>> programming >>> as far as I am concerned. besides I probably have more songs on my ipod >>> than most stations have on their play list. >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:48 PM >>> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >>> >>> Well, I think they are required to be auto for a certain period, then they have DJ's. I know Kjac is one station of the Jac format that has jocks on. When I first tried listening to it though, it was all music. - Original Message - From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 7:17 PM Subject: Re: broadcasting question >I personally know of a number of stations in Canada that are operated > completely by one person. Most of the work is contracted out in order > to > save money. Take for an example the Jack format. The format has become > popular in both the United States and Canada. The stations that > bought > the > rights to the format cleaned house, and rely completely on Jack radio > automation 24/7. Just load the computer and the program runs > indefinitely. > Why hire people when Jack can do the job. This of course does not make > good > radio, but try to convince the owners of such stations that there has > to > be > a human element to overlook things. . > I think that it was Lord Thompson that said "Owning a radio station > licence > is like having a licence to print money." > > - Original Message - > From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 7:45 PM > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > >> But it seems that if radio stations are relying heavily on computers >> these >> days, that they should be able to use accessible equipment so that >> more >> people can take advantage of a dream to get on the radio for the >> world! >> - Original Message - >> From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 8:33 PM >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> >>> That amount of money could easily buy an entire radio station >>> including >>> the >>> building that it is housed in. Unfortunately the vast majority of >>> broadcasters are not willing to pay for the cost of adaptive >>> equipment >>> nor >>> are they willing to modify their equipment in order to provide for >>> workplace >>> accommodation. With the introduction of computers into the broadcast >>> environment the industry has changed from a hands on user friendly >>> workplace >>> to one that in today's world looks more like a television studio >>> with >>> several monitors that have to be viewed constantly in order to make >>> sure >>> that all operating functions are carried out flawlessly. This could >>> be >>> anything from: the regular play list, transmitter functions, news >>> feeds, >>> station traffic and scheduling, and in many small markets the >>> reading >>> of >>> news and commercials. If you really want to get a taste as to what >>> radio >>> is >>> all about I would suggest visiting a radio station in your area and >>> talk >>> to >>> the staff, and from there you will get a feeling if this is the >>> right >>> business for you to be getting into. Another idea is to find a not >>> for >>> profit community radio station that is run by volunteers. Volunteers >>> will >>> often take the time to show you the ropes of
Re: broadcasting question
Sounds interesting. Will have to give it a listen on a good clear night. - Original Message - From: "Steve Matzura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 5:07 AM Subject: Re: broadcasting question > That 5khz audio business is all to pervasive. Most of the New York > City stations--certainly all the ones offering the digital sideband > thing--are using it, and their audio sounds like old 1960's bad tapes. > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: broadcasting question
People want something for nothing, and commercial radio is the only thing that one doesn't have to pay for these days. As long as commercial radio can come up with the goods loyal listeners will remain committed. Change the rules of the game and they will simply move on. Putting a multitude of stations on one frequency isn't going to solve the problem. It is my feeling that listeners want to become more involved in programming. This can be achieved in a number of ways. For an example becoming a program host for a day. Obviously the host would have to have some skills in this area of expertise. A talent search could be conducted in much the same way that we search out good talent on American idle. When tuning in a particular station I for one will take the path of least resistance. If the station is at the end of the dial and has good programming I will probably gravitate to that station. When I worked in AM radio and AM radio was the only game in town we were fortunate to be smack dab in the middle of the dial. We had two other bookend stations on both sides of us. If the listeners did not like their programming they would simply change their dial to us and leave it there and never change it again. It is for this reason that we were a solid number one with 84% of the local audience. Another plus for us is that we were on the same frequency as the big eight in Windsor, Ontario. That in itself speaks for itself. Radio is so fragmented to day that you would be hard pressed to get even 20% in a major market. A tough sell for anyone trying to sell radio advertising to a potential client. . - Original Message - From: "Tate Luck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'PC audio discussion list. '" Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 8:29 AM Subject: RE: broadcasting question > The bullet for FM is multi-channel. When Fm can have two to eight stations > on one frequency and it is free, XM and friends will not be such a great > idea. > > The radios are coming down, you will be able to get one for 75 buks in the > next year. > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Bob Seed > Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 12:38 AM > To: PC audio discussion list. > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > That is to say if we can get everyone on the same page, and workout a > standard that will make everyone happy. > - Original Message - > From: "Dave Marthouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 11:27 PM > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > >> In my opinion fm iboc will do well as receiver prices come down and >> multi-channel capability comes to pass. I think you hit the nail on the >> head regarding am iboc. In the future things may get better on the am >> front >> when the hybrid am iboc will be replaced by full digital. I think the >> total >> digital conversion will take ten or more years. >> >> >> Dave Marthouse >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 11:12 PM >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> >>> The question though, is whey stations are doing it who are analog and >>> have >>> no plans for IBOC in the near future. From what most engineers tell me >>> who >>> don't work for CC or NPR, AM IBOC is a real bad deal for AM audio and >>> the >>> IBOC audio sounds like a bad Windows Media feed, but there has been too >> much >>> money invested by NPR and Clear Channel to turn back now. >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Dave Marthouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 3:30 PM >>> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >>> >>> >>> > The reason why lots of am stations are tailoring their audio response >>> > to >>> > 5KHZ is to make room for the IBOC signal. IBOC is in band on channel >>> > digital audio broadcasting. The current hybrid form of IBOC being >>> > used >> in >>> > the united states takes up the sidebands above the 5KHZ bandwidth. >>> > >>> > >>> > Dave Marthouse >>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > - Original Message - >>> > From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 3:00 PM >>> > Subject: Re: broadcasting question >>> > >>> > >>> >> Yes, that's true. But in most cases, they already had the audio >> response >>> >> necessary. They already had good response before the made it 5KHZ. >>> >> - Original Message - >>> >> From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> >> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 2:50 PM >>> >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> > The frequency response on AM radio isn't that good to begin with, >>> >> > and >>> >> > it >>> >> > is >>> >> > certainly not worth spending the money to enhance the audio. The
RE: broadcasting question
Chuck, You can email me off list. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ware are you located? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Adkins Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 9:54 AM To: PC audio discussion list. Subject: Re: broadcasting question I would be glad to help. I'd also like to get in touch with Tate Luck. Chuck - Original Message - From: "Tate Luck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'PC audio discussion list. '" Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 8:06 AM Subject: RE: broadcasting question >I agree. I am in the Columvus market ( 38.) > > I have been in the business for 26 years. > > I program three stations. > > > You can make it in radio, but keep in mind you have to pay your dues. By > working the crap jobs first. > > I am willing to help to. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Jed Barton > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 2:27 AM > To: 'PC audio discussion list. ' > Subject: RE: broadcasting question > > I'm in the Providence market, which is like 35. > > -Original Message- > From: Johnnie J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 2:21 AM > To: PC audio discussion list. > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > > Are you in a small market and where would one go to find the jobs in a > smaller mark, if that is where you are? > If you are in a market of 30, or higher please let me know. > - Original Message - > From: "Jed Barton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'PC audio discussion list. '" > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:05 PM > Subject: RE: broadcasting question > > >> Brandon, >> That's bunch of crap. >> I'm totally blind and have been in the industry for 15 years. They >> have a lot of growing up to do Hit me back, and we can talk about it. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Gary Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 4:00 PM >> To: PC audio discussion list. >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> >> This doesn't sound like they were maybe being totally fair with you! >> - Original Message - >> From: "Brandon Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:31 PM >> Subject: broadcasting question >> >> >>> hi list, >>> I'm interested in going into radio broadcasting. I know there are >>> people out >>> there who have done it, so i emailed a local school that teaches a >> course >>> for broadcasting. here is the reply I received when i asked about a >> blind >>> person attending. >>> >>> Hi Brandon, sorry about the delay in getting back to you. >>> Unfortunately this >>> is not a program that is suitable to the visually impaired. Mainly >> because >>> the cost of accomodating the expense of required equipment would >> exceed >>> over >>> $500,000.00. Not only the expense, but radio stations and their >> corporate >>> ownership will never incur such an expense, nor is it feasible to >> create a >>> studio suitable for this. I understand your disappointment, however, >>> wanted to be very honest with you regarding the reality of this. I >>> truly wish >> you >>> well in all of your future endeavors and if there is anything you >> require >>> further information on, please feel free to email or call me. Once >> again, >>> thank you for your interest in CSMB. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Jacquie Hammond >>> President/CSMB >>> >>> Now what is this 500 thousand dollar cost all about? I would be able >>> to, as >>> far as I know and I did visit a radio studio to use the mixing > boards, >> and >>> they use windows software for the playlist editing, so it would be a >>> simple matter of creating scripts. I'm quite curious to see, has >>> anyone got >> any >>> clues? >>> thanks >>> Brandon Hicks >>> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Skype: callto://reyuth >>> msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >>> http://www.pc-audio.org >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists > >>> we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com >>> >> >> >> >> ___ >> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >> http://www.pc-audio.org >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists > we >> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com >> >> >> >> ___ >> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >> http://www.pc-audio.org >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists > we >> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com >> > > _
Re: M4A Files
actually, nero, prefected the file format. - Original Message - From: "Allison Mervis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 9:59 AM Subject: Re: M4A Files > But I thought I'd seen them before ITunes existed. Perhaps not. > Allison > > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 9:41 AM > Subject: Re: M4A Files > > >> m4a is, to the best of my knoledge a outcropping of the format apple >> uses >> f >> for itunes >> >> tj >> - Original Message - >> From: "Allison Mervis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 12:32 AM >> Subject: Re: M4A Files >> >> >>> Nope. m4a is a stand alone file type, and not associated with ipods to >>> the >>> best of my knowledge. >>> Allison >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 12:14 AM >>> Subject: Re: M4A Files >>> >>> I wonder if these aren't aac files? I think they have to do with Ipods. I heard one can rename them .mp4 and play but I don't know if that format was out in Winamp 2.90, maybe 2.97 may be better. - Original Message - From: "Kelly Sapergia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 10:54 PM Subject: M4A Files > Hi, >I subscribed to a new podcast today, but the files it downloads > havve > the extension .m4a. I'm using version 2.90 of WinAmp, which doesn't > play > this type of file by default, but I thought I heard that later > versions > can > play it. However, I'm reluctant to upgrade to a later version, because > 2.90 > is working fine for me. I tried converting the M4A file to an MP3 with > the > trial version of Easy CDDA Extractor, but it gave me an error about > decoding the file or something. Does anyone know if there's a plugin > for > WinAmp 2.90 that can play this type of file, or should I upgrade to a > later > version? >Thanks. > > > Yours Sincerely, > Kelly John Sapergia > For a mix of New Age, Ambient, Easy Listening, Smooth Jazz and Global > Fusion music, listen to "Northern Lights", Thursdays from 01:00 to > 03:00 > GMT (Wednesdays in North America) on ACB (American Council of the > Blind) > Radio Interactive at http://interactive.acbradio.org > Visit the show's web site at > http://www.ksapergia.net/northernlights.html > For high-quality audio productions at affordable prices, visit KJS > Productions at: http://www.kjsproductions.com > You can also visit my personal web site at: > http://www.ksapergia.net > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists > we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >>> http://www.pc-audio.org >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >>> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com >>> >> >> >> ___ >> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >> http://www.pc-audio.org >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > > ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To se
Re: broadcasting question
Three thousand songs are nothing! The average MP3 player holds about 6000 songs and the songs have no anoying commercials in between. - Original Message - From: "michael Babcock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 10:59 AM Subject: Re: broadcasting question > the local radio station said they have a max of 3000 songs at a time, i > told > him i have more songs that always! > - Original Message - > From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 8:20 PM > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > >> It is possible that they may have some live programming in prime time, >> but >> I >> would venture to say that in off hours it is 100% automation. When it is >> raining cats and dogs and the announcer says that it is bright and sunny >> you >> know damn well that the station is on automatic pilot. Not good >> programming >> as far as I am concerned. besides I probably have more songs on my ipod >> than most stations have on their play list. >> - Original Message - >> From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:48 PM >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> >>> Well, I think they are required to be auto for a certain period, then >>> they >>> have DJ's. I know Kjac is one station of the Jac format that has jocks >>> on. >>> When I first tried listening to it though, it was all music. >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 7:17 PM >>> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >>> >>> I personally know of a number of stations in Canada that are operated completely by one person. Most of the work is contracted out in order to save money. Take for an example the Jack format. The format has become popular in both the United States and Canada. The stations that bought the rights to the format cleaned house, and rely completely on Jack radio automation 24/7. Just load the computer and the program runs indefinitely. Why hire people when Jack can do the job. This of course does not make good radio, but try to convince the owners of such stations that there has to be a human element to overlook things. . I think that it was Lord Thompson that said "Owning a radio station licence is like having a licence to print money." - Original Message - From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 7:45 PM Subject: Re: broadcasting question > But it seems that if radio stations are relying heavily on computers > these > days, that they should be able to use accessible equipment so that > more > people can take advantage of a dream to get on the radio for the > world! > - Original Message - > From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 8:33 PM > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > >> That amount of money could easily buy an entire radio station >> including >> the >> building that it is housed in. Unfortunately the vast majority of >> broadcasters are not willing to pay for the cost of adaptive >> equipment >> nor >> are they willing to modify their equipment in order to provide for >> workplace >> accommodation. With the introduction of computers into the broadcast >> environment the industry has changed from a hands on user friendly >> workplace >> to one that in today's world looks more like a television studio with >> several monitors that have to be viewed constantly in order to make >> sure >> that all operating functions are carried out flawlessly. This could >> be >> anything from: the regular play list, transmitter functions, news >> feeds, >> station traffic and scheduling, and in many small markets the reading >> of >> news and commercials. If you really want to get a taste as to what >> radio >> is >> all about I would suggest visiting a radio station in your area and >> talk >> to >> the staff, and from there you will get a feeling if this is the right >> business for you to be getting into. Another idea is to find a not >> for >> profit community radio station that is run by volunteers. Volunteers >> will >> often take the time to show you the ropes of the industry. many of >> these >> small stations are hands on operations without a lot of computer >> equipment >> and software programs. In most cases there is a small eight input >> control >> board with a telephone hybrid and a couple of CD and cassette >> players. >> This >> in my opinion
Re: broadcasting question
I have worked in the broadcast industry for over thirty years and have always maintained that live and local is the best. Although we often like to go abroad and explore and want to find out what is going on around the world we usually come back home to explore our local roots looking for information in regards to what is going on in our home community. Is there a baseball tournament taking place tonight at our local community baseball field? Is it going to rain today? What is in the long-range forecast for the next three days? The thing here is that live and local programming costs money, and the big boys of broadcasting are, for the most part not willing to fork out the bucks to pay for this talent. They want the easy way out, and that is simply by playing gobs of music. I am not against music, but feel that a healthy balance of local and relevant information and a good blend of music has to be reached. Radio has personality, and we should strive to get that point across to our listeners. What annoys me the most are those classic lines, such as: "just around the corner we are going to hear from the Beatles." Exactly what do they mean by saying just around the corner? You hear these lines on just about every station. This tells me that stations are copping one another in order to get audience share. The Jack format is yet another bug a boo with me as well. I am afraid that the Jack format has warn out it's welcome. You can only use those canned messages for so long and the audience gets tired of them, and will simply move on to another radio station that has intelligent programming. - Original Message - From: "Tate Luck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'PC audio discussion list. '" Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 8:41 AM Subject: RE: broadcasting question >I have both satellite services. > I believe you can have 300 stations and unless you are relevant know one > will care for very long. > > Most stations are music services and hear lies the problem. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Bob Seed > Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 12:40 AM > To: PC audio discussion list. > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > I think that before the end of the year I will be going that way as well. > Do > > not like terrestrial radio. > > - Original Message - > From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 11:26 PM > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > >> That's one reason I stick with my XMPCR device. Not portable, but with an >> FM >> transmitter I can hear it around the house. I do like being able to read >> the >> text of all the channels. >> - Original Message - >> From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 8:03 PM >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> >>>I don't think that it will be too long before a talking receiver will be >>> available. To me it would be nothing more than converting the text >>> information on the screen to speech. >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 6:48 PM >>> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >>> >>> That's the thing I hate about XM is not knowing what that song was they just played on a channel I like. - Original Message - From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 4:22 PM Subject: Re: broadcasting question > The problem with DAB is that nobody can agree to a Northamerican > standard. > We all know what happened to AM stereo. The consumer will ultimately > determine whether DAB is going to take off or not. I honestly can't > see > people running out to buy new receivers. What you will see is that > there > will be a move to the FM band with all stations gradually converting > over > to DAB. There will be no need for announcers on a fulltime bases, as > song > title, artist, and other information will be displayed on a screen in > much > the same format as is being used with XM and Sirious. I can see > commercial > content going this way as well, as many of us see commercials as an > intrusion as apposed to providing a service Talk radio will survive, > but > the > future of commercial music stations looks bleak. The shift is towards > downloading of MP3 files, and blog newscasts. With digital > broadcasting > it > will be possible for you to customize the delivery of information > according > to your needs. If you want to hear the 8:00 AM news at 8:15 that will > be > possible simply by entering an assigned code on a keypad. You will > probably > have a choice on who will deliver the news to your receiver. T
Re: broadcasting question
and guess what, i guess none of this will be accessable - Original Message - From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 2:22 PM Subject: Re: broadcasting question > The problem with DAB is that nobody can agree to a Northamerican standard. > We all know what happened to AM stereo. The consumer will ultimately > determine whether DAB is going to take off or not. I honestly can't see > people running out to buy new receivers. What you will see is that there > will be a move to the FM band with all stations gradually converting over > to DAB. There will be no need for announcers on a fulltime bases, as song > title, artist, and other information will be displayed on a screen in much > the same format as is being used with XM and Sirious. I can see commercial > content going this way as well, as many of us see commercials as an > intrusion as apposed to providing a service Talk radio will survive, but > the > future of commercial music stations looks bleak. The shift is towards > downloading of MP3 files, and blog newscasts. With digital broadcasting it > will be possible for you to customize the delivery of information > according > to your needs. If you want to hear the 8:00 AM news at 8:15 that will be > possible simply by entering an assigned code on a keypad. You will > probably > have a choice on who will deliver the news to your receiver. The > possibilities are limitless. Another plus is that you will be able to > listen > to NPR from coast to coast without missing a beat. You will simply move > from > one cell to another, and the radio will do that for you automatically. > . > > - Original Message - > From: "Dave Marthouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 3:30 PM > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > >> The reason why lots of am stations are tailoring their audio response to >> 5KHZ is to make room for the IBOC signal. IBOC is in band on channel >> digital audio broadcasting. The current hybrid form of IBOC being used >> in >> the united states takes up the sidebands above the 5KHZ bandwidth. >> >> >> Dave Marthouse >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 3:00 PM >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> >>> Yes, that's true. But in most cases, they already had the audio response >>> necessary. They already had good response before the made it 5KHZ. >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 2:50 PM >>> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >>> >>> >>> > The frequency response on AM radio isn't that good to begin with, and >>> > it >>> > is >>> > certainly not worth spending the money to enhance the audio. The >> thinking >>> > here is to produce a signal that has a flat response and leave the >>> > other >>> > adjustments to the listener. However on FM it is a different story. >>> > Audio processing can now be done remotely from the desktop, and can be >>> > adjusted to fit a number of different formats. >>> > - Original Message - >>> > From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 2:33 PM >>> > Subject: Re: broadcasting question >>> > >>> > >>> >> Yes, an engineer told me that he set his station audio for 6KHZ audio >> and >>> >> he >>> >> runs an analog station which touts music. Go figure. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> - Original Message - >>> >> From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> >> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 12:40 PM >>> >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> Well, AM is almost as low quality sounding as the telephone but it >>> >>> has >> a >>> >>> different sort of sound to it. I suppose they need that bandwidth >>> >>> for >>> >>> the >>> >>> IBOC. I thought normal was a 10K limit and now down to 5, that's a >>> >>> lot >>> >>> of >>> >>> difference, in theory. >>> >>> >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> >>> From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> >>> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 10:08 AM >>> >>> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Well, they tell me that it cuts down on AM splatter. I am amazed >>> that >> a >>> station here WMNI who touts their music is now using the 5khz >>> audio. >>> The >>> transmitters that do analog and IBOC have a setting for 5KHZ which >>> is >>> what >>> their analog signal gives you when they are using IBOC. Engineers >> tell >>> me >>> that they are going to that because everyone else is and they say >> "it's >>> good >>> enough." There is no hearing advantage to the 5KHZ audio, just tech >>>
Re: broadcasting question
the local radio station said they have a max of 3000 songs at a time, i told him i have more songs that always! - Original Message - From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 8:20 PM Subject: Re: broadcasting question > It is possible that they may have some live programming in prime time, but > I > would venture to say that in off hours it is 100% automation. When it is > raining cats and dogs and the announcer says that it is bright and sunny > you > know damn well that the station is on automatic pilot. Not good > programming > as far as I am concerned. besides I probably have more songs on my ipod > than most stations have on their play list. > - Original Message - > From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:48 PM > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > >> Well, I think they are required to be auto for a certain period, then >> they >> have DJ's. I know Kjac is one station of the Jac format that has jocks >> on. >> When I first tried listening to it though, it was all music. >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 7:17 PM >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> >>>I personally know of a number of stations in Canada that are operated >>> completely by one person. Most of the work is contracted out in order to >>> save money. Take for an example the Jack format. The format has become >>> popular in both the United States and Canada. The stations that bought >>> the >>> rights to the format cleaned house, and rely completely on Jack radio >>> automation 24/7. Just load the computer and the program runs >>> indefinitely. >>> Why hire people when Jack can do the job. This of course does not make >>> good >>> radio, but try to convince the owners of such stations that there has to >>> be >>> a human element to overlook things. . >>> I think that it was Lord Thompson that said "Owning a radio station >>> licence >>> is like having a licence to print money." >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 7:45 PM >>> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >>> >>> But it seems that if radio stations are relying heavily on computers these days, that they should be able to use accessible equipment so that more people can take advantage of a dream to get on the radio for the world! - Original Message - From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 8:33 PM Subject: Re: broadcasting question > That amount of money could easily buy an entire radio station > including > the > building that it is housed in. Unfortunately the vast majority of > broadcasters are not willing to pay for the cost of adaptive equipment > nor > are they willing to modify their equipment in order to provide for > workplace > accommodation. With the introduction of computers into the broadcast > environment the industry has changed from a hands on user friendly > workplace > to one that in today's world looks more like a television studio with > several monitors that have to be viewed constantly in order to make > sure > that all operating functions are carried out flawlessly. This could be > anything from: the regular play list, transmitter functions, news > feeds, > station traffic and scheduling, and in many small markets the reading > of > news and commercials. If you really want to get a taste as to what > radio > is > all about I would suggest visiting a radio station in your area and > talk > to > the staff, and from there you will get a feeling if this is the right > business for you to be getting into. Another idea is to find a not for > profit community radio station that is run by volunteers. Volunteers > will > often take the time to show you the ropes of the industry. many of > these > small stations are hands on operations without a lot of computer > equipment > and software programs. In most cases there is a small eight input > control > board with a telephone hybrid and a couple of CD and cassette players. > This > in my opinion is a foot in the door as they say. An online radio > station > or > signing up to perform in announcing function or host on ACB radio is > yet > another option that should seriously be considered. The downside of > the > broadcast industry is that most radio stations are automated and > unfortunately do not require staffing levels that we experienced five > to > ten > years ago. The bottom line here is that you are going to have to do > yo
Re: M4A Files
But I thought I'd seen them before ITunes existed. Perhaps not. Allison - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 9:41 AM Subject: Re: M4A Files > m4a is, to the best of my knoledge a outcropping of the format apple uses > f > for itunes > > tj > - Original Message - > From: "Allison Mervis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 12:32 AM > Subject: Re: M4A Files > > >> Nope. m4a is a stand alone file type, and not associated with ipods to >> the >> best of my knowledge. >> Allison >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 12:14 AM >> Subject: Re: M4A Files >> >> >>>I wonder if these aren't aac files? I think they have to do with Ipods. I >>> heard one can rename them .mp4 and play but I don't know if that format >>> was >>> out in Winamp 2.90, maybe 2.97 may be better. >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Kelly Sapergia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: >>> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 10:54 PM >>> Subject: M4A Files >>> >>> Hi, I subscribed to a new podcast today, but the files it downloads havve the extension .m4a. I'm using version 2.90 of WinAmp, which doesn't play this type of file by default, but I thought I heard that later versions can play it. However, I'm reluctant to upgrade to a later version, because 2.90 is working fine for me. I tried converting the M4A file to an MP3 with the trial version of Easy CDDA Extractor, but it gave me an error about decoding the file or something. Does anyone know if there's a plugin for WinAmp 2.90 that can play this type of file, or should I upgrade to a later version? Thanks. Yours Sincerely, Kelly John Sapergia For a mix of New Age, Ambient, Easy Listening, Smooth Jazz and Global Fusion music, listen to "Northern Lights", Thursdays from 01:00 to 03:00 GMT (Wednesdays in North America) on ACB (American Council of the Blind) Radio Interactive at http://interactive.acbradio.org Visit the show's web site at http://www.ksapergia.net/northernlights.html For high-quality audio productions at affordable prices, visit KJS Productions at: http://www.kjsproductions.com You can also visit my personal web site at: http://www.ksapergia.net ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >>> http://www.pc-audio.org >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >>> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com >> >> >> ___ >> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >> http://www.pc-audio.org >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com >> > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: M4A Files
hi, i checked my EZ CDDA extractor. m4a and mp4 are both versions of aac audio. the latest version of cdda extracter can convert them, i believe. or the latest winamp should be able to play them, however i haven't gotten it to work with aac files i convert in CDex. brandon Brandon Hicks Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: callto://reyuth msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: M4A Files
m4a is, to the best of my knoledge a outcropping of the format apple uses f for itunes tj - Original Message - From: "Allison Mervis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 12:32 AM Subject: Re: M4A Files > Nope. m4a is a stand alone file type, and not associated with ipods to the > best of my knowledge. > Allison > > - Original Message - > From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 12:14 AM > Subject: Re: M4A Files > > >>I wonder if these aren't aac files? I think they have to do with Ipods. I >> heard one can rename them .mp4 and play but I don't know if that format >> was >> out in Winamp 2.90, maybe 2.97 may be better. >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Kelly Sapergia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: >> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 10:54 PM >> Subject: M4A Files >> >> >>> Hi, >>>I subscribed to a new podcast today, but the files it downloads havve >>> the extension .m4a. I'm using version 2.90 of WinAmp, which doesn't play >>> this type of file by default, but I thought I heard that later versions >>> can >>> play it. However, I'm reluctant to upgrade to a later version, because >>> 2.90 >>> is working fine for me. I tried converting the M4A file to an MP3 with >>> the >>> trial version of Easy CDDA Extractor, but it gave me an error about >>> decoding the file or something. Does anyone know if there's a plugin for >>> WinAmp 2.90 that can play this type of file, or should I upgrade to a >>> later >>> version? >>>Thanks. >>> >>> >>> Yours Sincerely, >>> Kelly John Sapergia >>> For a mix of New Age, Ambient, Easy Listening, Smooth Jazz and Global >>> Fusion music, listen to "Northern Lights", Thursdays from 01:00 to 03:00 >>> GMT (Wednesdays in North America) on ACB (American Council of the Blind) >>> Radio Interactive at http://interactive.acbradio.org >>> Visit the show's web site at >>> http://www.ksapergia.net/northernlights.html >>> For high-quality audio productions at affordable prices, visit KJS >>> Productions at: http://www.kjsproductions.com >>> You can also visit my personal web site at: >>> http://www.ksapergia.net >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >>> http://www.pc-audio.org >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >>> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com >>> >> >> >> ___ >> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >> http://www.pc-audio.org >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: Can not select microphon from the volume control.
Hi Anders, I am having the same problem, but haven't found the cause yet. R Q J - Original Message - From: "Anders Holmberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 7:38 AM Subject: Can not select microphon from the volume control. HEllo! I have an ac97 onboard soundcard on my computer. Its a packardbell colputer. I also have windows xp home sp2 installed on it. In the volume control in windows you should be able to select microphone as a recording source. But when i try to check that checkbox it becomes checked an unchecked again. This happens very vast. THe strange thing is that it seems that all checkboxes except from the stereo mix checkbox seem to behave in the same way. But the stereo mix behaves reverted. It becomes unchecked and then checked again. I wonder if anybody here has came across this before? Any help is highly appreciated. THanks in advance. /Anders. ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: M4A Files
What the hell happened to that message! Here's what I was trying to say. Upgrading to the new version is good for you. They've fixed the playlist issues that you were speaking of. - Original Message - From: "Nick G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 8:46 AM Subject: Re: M4A Files > Kelly, > Those playlist problems have been fixed. I can say without a doubt that > upgrading to the new version is good foryou. > Thanks, > Nick > - Original Message - > From: "Kelly Sapergia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 1:23 AM > Subject: Re: M4A Files > > >> Hi Nick, >>Thanks for the suggestion. While I don't mind upgrading to a newer >> version of the program, I was experiencing playlist problems when using >> version 5.08 and 5.09 while broadcasting. I suspect the problem had >> something to do with the Extended Jump to File plugin, but I'm not taking >> any chances. >>Thanks again. >> >> >> Yours Sincerely, >> Kelly John Sapergia >> For a mix of New Age, Ambient, Easy Listening, Smooth Jazz and Global >> Fusion music, listen to "Northern Lights", Thursdays from 01:00 to 03:00 >> GMT (Wednesdays in North America) on ACB (American Council of the Blind) >> Radio Interactive at http://interactive.acbradio.org >> Visit the show's web site at http://www.ksapergia.net/northernlights.html >> For high-quality audio productions at affordable prices, visit KJS >> Productions at: http://www.kjsproductions.com >> You can also visit my personal web site at: >> http://www.ksapergia.net >> >> >> ___ >> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >> http://www.pc-audio.org >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com >> > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: M4A Files
Kelly, Those playlist problems have been fixed. I can say without a doubt that upgrading to the new version is good foryou. Thanks, Nick - Original Message - From: "Kelly Sapergia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 1:23 AM Subject: Re: M4A Files > Hi Nick, >Thanks for the suggestion. While I don't mind upgrading to a newer > version of the program, I was experiencing playlist problems when using > version 5.08 and 5.09 while broadcasting. I suspect the problem had > something to do with the Extended Jump to File plugin, but I'm not taking > any chances. >Thanks again. > > > Yours Sincerely, > Kelly John Sapergia > For a mix of New Age, Ambient, Easy Listening, Smooth Jazz and Global > Fusion music, listen to "Northern Lights", Thursdays from 01:00 to 03:00 > GMT (Wednesdays in North America) on ACB (American Council of the Blind) > Radio Interactive at http://interactive.acbradio.org > Visit the show's web site at http://www.ksapergia.net/northernlights.html > For high-quality audio productions at affordable prices, visit KJS > Productions at: http://www.kjsproductions.com > You can also visit my personal web site at: > http://www.ksapergia.net > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
RE: broadcasting question
I have both satellite services. I believe you can have 300 stations and unless you are relevant know one will care for very long. Most stations are music services and hear lies the problem. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Seed Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 12:40 AM To: PC audio discussion list. Subject: Re: broadcasting question I think that before the end of the year I will be going that way as well. Do not like terrestrial radio. - Original Message - From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 11:26 PM Subject: Re: broadcasting question > That's one reason I stick with my XMPCR device. Not portable, but with an > FM > transmitter I can hear it around the house. I do like being able to read > the > text of all the channels. > - Original Message - > From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 8:03 PM > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > >>I don't think that it will be too long before a talking receiver will be >> available. To me it would be nothing more than converting the text >> information on the screen to speech. >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 6:48 PM >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> >>> That's the thing I hate about XM is not knowing what that song was they >>> just >>> played on a channel I like. >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 4:22 PM >>> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >>> >>> The problem with DAB is that nobody can agree to a Northamerican standard. We all know what happened to AM stereo. The consumer will ultimately determine whether DAB is going to take off or not. I honestly can't see people running out to buy new receivers. What you will see is that there will be a move to the FM band with all stations gradually converting over to DAB. There will be no need for announcers on a fulltime bases, as song title, artist, and other information will be displayed on a screen in much the same format as is being used with XM and Sirious. I can see commercial content going this way as well, as many of us see commercials as an intrusion as apposed to providing a service Talk radio will survive, but the future of commercial music stations looks bleak. The shift is towards downloading of MP3 files, and blog newscasts. With digital broadcasting it will be possible for you to customize the delivery of information according to your needs. If you want to hear the 8:00 AM news at 8:15 that will be possible simply by entering an assigned code on a keypad. You will probably have a choice on who will deliver the news to your receiver. The possibilities are limitless. Another plus is that you will be able to listen to NPR from coast to coast without missing a beat. You will simply move from one cell to another, and the radio will do that for you automatically. . - Original Message - From: "Dave Marthouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 3:30 PM Subject: Re: broadcasting question > The reason why lots of am stations are tailoring their audio response > to > 5KHZ is to make room for the IBOC signal. IBOC is in band on channel > digital audio broadcasting. The current hybrid form of IBOC being > used > in > the united states takes up the sidebands above the 5KHZ bandwidth. > > > Dave Marthouse > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 3:00 PM > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > >> Yes, that's true. But in most cases, they already had the audio >> response >> necessary. They already had good response before the made it 5KHZ. >> - Original Message - >> From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 2:50 PM >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> >> > The frequency response on AM radio isn't that good to begin with, >> > and >> > it >> > is >> > certainly not worth spending the money to enhance the audio. The > thinking >> > here is to produce a signal that has a flat response and leave the >> > other >> > adjustments to the listener. However on FM it is a different >> > story. >> > Audio processing can now be done remotely from
RE: broadcasting question
The bullet for FM is multi-channel. When Fm can have two to eight stations on one frequency and it is free, XM and friends will not be such a great idea. The radios are coming down, you will be able to get one for 75 buks in the next year. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Seed Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 12:38 AM To: PC audio discussion list. Subject: Re: broadcasting question That is to say if we can get everyone on the same page, and workout a standard that will make everyone happy. - Original Message - From: "Dave Marthouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 11:27 PM Subject: Re: broadcasting question > In my opinion fm iboc will do well as receiver prices come down and > multi-channel capability comes to pass. I think you hit the nail on the > head regarding am iboc. In the future things may get better on the am > front > when the hybrid am iboc will be replaced by full digital. I think the > total > digital conversion will take ten or more years. > > > Dave Marthouse > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 11:12 PM > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > >> The question though, is whey stations are doing it who are analog and >> have >> no plans for IBOC in the near future. From what most engineers tell me >> who >> don't work for CC or NPR, AM IBOC is a real bad deal for AM audio and the >> IBOC audio sounds like a bad Windows Media feed, but there has been too > much >> money invested by NPR and Clear Channel to turn back now. >> - Original Message - >> From: "Dave Marthouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 3:30 PM >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> >> > The reason why lots of am stations are tailoring their audio response >> > to >> > 5KHZ is to make room for the IBOC signal. IBOC is in band on channel >> > digital audio broadcasting. The current hybrid form of IBOC being used > in >> > the united states takes up the sidebands above the 5KHZ bandwidth. >> > >> > >> > Dave Marthouse >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> > >> > - Original Message - >> > From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 3:00 PM >> > Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> > >> > >> >> Yes, that's true. But in most cases, they already had the audio > response >> >> necessary. They already had good response before the made it 5KHZ. >> >> - Original Message - >> >> From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> >> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 2:50 PM >> >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> >> >> >> >> > The frequency response on AM radio isn't that good to begin with, >> >> > and >> >> > it >> >> > is >> >> > certainly not worth spending the money to enhance the audio. The >> > thinking >> >> > here is to produce a signal that has a flat response and leave the >> >> > other >> >> > adjustments to the listener. However on FM it is a different story. >> >> > Audio processing can now be done remotely from the desktop, and can > be >> >> > adjusted to fit a number of different formats. >> >> > - Original Message - >> >> > From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> >> > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 2:33 PM >> >> > Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> Yes, an engineer told me that he set his station audio for 6KHZ > audio >> > and >> >> >> he >> >> >> runs an analog station which touts music. Go figure. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - Original Message - >> >> >> From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> >> >> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 12:40 PM >> >> >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Well, AM is almost as low quality sounding as the telephone but it >> >> >>> has >> > a >> >> >>> different sort of sound to it. I suppose they need that bandwidth > for >> >> >>> the >> >> >>> IBOC. I thought normal was a 10K limit and now down to 5, that's a >> >> >>> lot >> >> >>> of >> >> >>> difference, in theory. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> - Original Message - >> >> >>> From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> >> >>> Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 10:08 AM >> >> >>> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Well, they tell me that it cuts down on AM splatter. I am amazed >> >> that >> > a >> >> station here WMNI who touts their music is now using the 5khz > audio. >> >> The >> >> transmitters that do analog and IBOC have a setting for 5KHZ >> >> which >> >> is >> >> what >> >> their analog signal gives you when th
Re: Can not select microphon from the volume control.
anders, what screen reader, are you using? jaws, sometimes might do that if you have access to window eyes, you might want to try that to see if that will fix your problem. - Original Message - From: "Anders Holmberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 6:38 AM Subject: Can not select microphon from the volume control. > HEllo! > I have an ac97 onboard soundcard on my computer. > Its a packardbell colputer. > I also have windows xp home sp2 installed on it. > In the volume control in windows you should be able to select microphone > as a recording source. > But when i try to check that checkbox it becomes checked an unchecked > again. > This happens very vast. > THe strange thing is that it seems that all checkboxes except from the > stereo mix checkbox seem to behave in the same way. > But the stereo mix behaves reverted. > It becomes unchecked and then checked again. > I wonder if anybody here has came across this before? > Any help is highly appreciated. > THanks in advance. > /Anders. > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > > ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Can not select microphon from the volume control.
HEllo! I have an ac97 onboard soundcard on my computer. Its a packardbell colputer. I also have windows xp home sp2 installed on it. In the volume control in windows you should be able to select microphone as a recording source. But when i try to check that checkbox it becomes checked an unchecked again. This happens very vast. THe strange thing is that it seems that all checkboxes except from the stereo mix checkbox seem to behave in the same way. But the stereo mix behaves reverted. It becomes unchecked and then checked again. I wonder if anybody here has came across this before? Any help is highly appreciated. THanks in advance. /Anders. ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: Soundforge Tutorial By Mosen For FS
if you mean, to listen to radio stations, it is still free, all you have to do , is sign up for a free acccount. - Original Message - From: "Keao Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 3:56 AM Subject: Re: Soundforge Tutorial By Mosen For FS >I have it to, it's really cool! > Verry interesting, it was done on windows 98. > I wish that live 365 was still free. > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > > ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: M4A Files
kelly the latest version ofwinamp, doesn't seem to have those problems, in a way winamp has grown, in its feature list, and the things it can do. theonly, thing i wish is that the library support would be back. like it was, in the eariler versions of the program. - Original Message - From: "Kelly Sapergia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 12:23 AM Subject: Re: M4A Files > Hi Nick, >Thanks for the suggestion. While I don't mind upgrading to a newer > version of the program, I was experiencing playlist problems when using > version 5.08 and 5.09 while broadcasting. I suspect the problem had > something to do with the Extended Jump to File plugin, but I'm not taking > any chances. >Thanks again. > > > Yours Sincerely, > Kelly John Sapergia > For a mix of New Age, Ambient, Easy Listening, Smooth Jazz and Global > Fusion music, listen to "Northern Lights", Thursdays from 01:00 to 03:00 > GMT (Wednesdays in North America) on ACB (American Council of the Blind) > Radio Interactive at http://interactive.acbradio.org > Visit the show's web site at http://www.ksapergia.net/northernlights.html > For high-quality audio productions at affordable prices, visit KJS > Productions at: http://www.kjsproductions.com > You can also visit my personal web site at: > http://www.ksapergia.net > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > > ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: soundforge 7 scripts
What about Window-Eyes? The last set of SET files I saw for Sound Forge was for version 5. ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: broadcasting question
That 5khz audio business is all to pervasive. Most of the New York City stations--certainly all the ones offering the digital sideband thing--are using it, and their audio sounds like old 1960's bad tapes. ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: Soundforge Tutorial By Mosen For FS
I have it to, it's really cool! Verry interesting, it was done on windows 98. I wish that live 365 was still free. ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
