going on vacation mode or no mail
How do you go nomail or vacation mode on this list? -- This is Jason known as BlindFury To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: comparison between the LS-7 and DM-620
I don't know which one you should buy, but I certainly wouldn't go for the ls7 for the 96/24 sampling rate.What are you going to record that you believe requires such a high sampling rate, especially since you'll usually have to downsample to 44.1/16 anyway? And are you planning to spend hundreds or thousands on microphones and pre-amps so you'll actually notice the difference? I don't mean to sound harsh or sarcastic, but I don't see the necessity of going to 96/24 with what is essentially a consumer recorder. Even Neal Ewers in his podcast says he rarely uses those high rates. - Original Message - From: "Hamit Campos" To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 11:37 PM Subject: RE: comparison between the LS-7 and DM-620 I thought as much. The DM-620 sounded to me like a glorified DM-2 when I first read about it. So, at the time I said no, I'l stick to trying for the DM-4 thanks. But then along comes the LS-7 and makes me think again. It's cheaper then the DM-4, it sounds better, and it can record in full LPCM 96000KHZ at 24 bit. That's blue-ray audio. I don't know. We'll see, but I think I'll get this one instead. I mean, the catchy things about the DM-4 are the text to speech, speech recognition, and the DAISY player. But, it can only record in DVD quality namely 48000KHZ at 16 bit. As much as I like the 3 above mentioned things about the DM-4, I'm really thinking about the LS-7. What do you guys think. Which should I go for in your opinion? -Original Message- From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of John Riehl Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 9:42 PM To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org Subject: comparison between the LS-7 and DM-620 I've purchased both the Olympus Ls-7 and the DM-620 and want to post a brief comparison and review of the two recorders. The short version: I'm going to return the DM-620 to amazon. Although both recorders have three mics, the Ls-7 has better mics -- the two side mics stick out more than the DM-620 mics. there is no comparison re the quality of voice recordings; the LS-7 gives a much richer, life-like bass sound to recordings, even when recording in MP# mode. The DM-620 does not have a "pre-record" mode, which buffers two seconds of recording; the LS-7 has this mode. The DM-620 also does not have a 100HZ or 300HZ low-cut filter; you can either turn the low cut filter on or off on the DM-620. The LS-7 has a 100HZ and 300HZ low cut filter choice. both recorders have the same button configuration, which, in my opinion, is inferior to the Dm-420 or Dm-520. the record,/pause and stop buttons are on the front face of both recorders, not on the side as they are on the DM-520. The case on both recorders is terrible; it is really a sleeve. It does not have a flap that opens and closes, nor does it have the "kickstand" feature like the dM-520 case. Both recorders have the same level of voice guidance; 95% of the menu choices talk. Neither recorder gives you system memory info, nor can you set the clock by voice as far as I know. But all of the record, lay, file, etc, selections speak on both recorders. In short, if you are looking for an excellent digital recorder, spend a few more bucks and get the LS-7. You won't be sorry. . John Riehl To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
RE: comparison between the LS-7 and DM-620
I thought as much. The DM-620 sounded to me like a glorified DM-2 when I first read about it. So, at the time I said no, I'l stick to trying for the DM-4 thanks. But then along comes the LS-7 and makes me think again. It's cheaper then the DM-4, it sounds better, and it can record in full LPCM 96000KHZ at 24 bit. That's blue-ray audio. I don't know. We'll see, but I think I'll get this one instead. I mean, the catchy things about the DM-4 are the text to speech, speech recognition, and the DAISY player. But, it can only record in DVD quality namely 48000KHZ at 16 bit. As much as I like the 3 above mentioned things about the DM-4, I'm really thinking about the LS-7. What do you guys think. Which should I go for in your opinion? -Original Message- From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of John Riehl Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 9:42 PM To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org Subject: comparison between the LS-7 and DM-620 I've purchased both the Olympus Ls-7 and the DM-620 and want to post a brief comparison and review of the two recorders. The short version: I'm going to return the DM-620 to amazon. Although both recorders have three mics, the Ls-7 has better mics -- the two side mics stick out more than the DM-620 mics. there is no comparison re the quality of voice recordings; the LS-7 gives a much richer, life-like bass sound to recordings, even when recording in MP# mode. The DM-620 does not have a "pre-record" mode, which buffers two seconds of recording; the LS-7 has this mode. The DM-620 also does not have a 100HZ or 300HZ low-cut filter; you can either turn the low cut filter on or off on the DM-620. The LS-7 has a 100HZ and 300HZ low cut filter choice. both recorders have the same button configuration, which, in my opinion, is inferior to the Dm-420 or Dm-520. the record,/pause and stop buttons are on the front face of both recorders, not on the side as they are on the DM-520. The case on both recorders is terrible; it is really a sleeve. It does not have a flap that opens and closes, nor does it have the "kickstand" feature like the dM-520 case. Both recorders have the same level of voice guidance; 95% of the menu choices talk. Neither recorder gives you system memory info, nor can you set the clock by voice as far as I know. But all of the record, lay, file, etc, selections speak on both recorders. In short, if you are looking for an excellent digital recorder, spend a few more bucks and get the LS-7. You won't be sorry. . John Riehl To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
comparison between the LS-7 and DM-620
I've purchased both the Olympus Ls-7 and the DM-620 and want to post a brief comparison and review of the two recorders. The short version: I'm going to return the DM-620 to amazon. Although both recorders have three mics, the Ls-7 has better mics -- the two side mics stick out more than the DM-620 mics. there is no comparison re the quality of voice recordings; the LS-7 gives a much richer, life-like bass sound to recordings, even when recording in MP# mode. The DM-620 does not have a "pre-record" mode, which buffers two seconds of recording; the LS-7 has this mode. The DM-620 also does not have a 100HZ or 300HZ low-cut filter; you can either turn the low cut filter on or off on the DM-620. The LS-7 has a 100HZ and 300HZ low cut filter choice. both recorders have the same button configuration, which, in my opinion, is inferior to the Dm-420 or Dm-520. the record,/pause and stop buttons are on the front face of both recorders, not on the side as they are on the DM-520. The case on both recorders is terrible; it is really a sleeve. It does not have a flap that opens and closes, nor does it have the "kickstand" feature like the dM-520 case. Both recorders have the same level of voice guidance; 95% of the menu choices talk. Neither recorder gives you system memory info, nor can you set the clock by voice as far as I know. But all of the record, lay, file, etc, selections speak on both recorders. In short, if you are looking for an excellent digital recorder, spend a few more bucks and get the LS-7. You won't be sorry. . John Riehl To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: the mac
Thanks Steve. When I get my mac, I'll be in touch with you. - Original Message - From: "Steve Matzura" To: "PC Audio Discussion List" Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 8:38 PM Subject: Re: the mac Forced? OK, the quick answer is no, there's only one set of analog I/O for just about every Macintosh hardware I've ever laid hands on--notebook, desktop, they're all the same. What you want is a separate audio interface, like you suggested. Depending on what program you'll be using for your audio editing, you have choices, or limited choices. If you're going to use ProTools, Avid/Digidesign have opened this program up to virtually anything, or if not virtually anything, then a whole lot more than ever they used to allow, so check with your retailer to find out what's supported this week. Just about every major brand, like M-Audio or MOTU, is probably supported, and within those two brands alone is a plethora of choices. Can you use your Zoom H4N as an audio interface, if you have one, which I do not know? Don't know, but it would surely be interesting to me if you could, as that would make a very handy dandy external USB sound device for me. Bottom line is, find out what software you'll be using and what devices it supports natively or with installable drivers. HTH On Sat, 9 Jul 2011 00:47:52 -0400, you wrote: Hi I'm about to be forced in to buying a mac. What I want is a seperate channel for my synth. Does mac give more than one audio output, and can you direct voice over to use the second output. Are there any usb audio cards for the mac?. Thanks for any wiseom you have . phone:860- 874-5495 skype: kvreed5021 have a swinging day To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Papin Radio Scheduler
Hello list: I know that there are people on this list who use Tapin Radio, so possibly you can help me figure this out. Recently I started playing around with Tapin Radio; a neat program as I find I can put in some favorite radio stations and even record them if I want! I also found that it has a scheduler, which (if I understand right) enables one to record programs from these stations when I'm not able to be here. What I don't understand is how to make this work; I have tried several times to schedule an event, but get nothing! Or maybe it _is_ recording, but I don't know where it's putting the file! So if someone would care to give me "step-by-step" instructions as to how this is accomplished, it sure would be appreciated! Need to know the proper way to schedule a task; then need to know where it puts the file that Tapin Radio has recorded! Thanks in advance, Tom Kaufman P.S. Almost forgot: am running Windows XP as my operating system with Jaws 12. To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: subsonic clip editing at the sample level
Greetings, In GW this can easily be achieved by using the shift e command and instead of setting to time radio button, set to samples. Then setting zoom level at minimum, moving the start/finish markers can be by individual sample if you wish. This would always be most tedious but far as I know is the only way such could be achieved. Of course, you must have the edit value in the play controls set so as you move the markers, you play the sound. The edit box to be amended is found imediately following the wind values in the play tab. Colin Howard living in Park gate near Swanwick, a village in the southern English county of Hampshire where Britain's national air traffic control centre is now based, notes no matter whether summer or winter, often, we are the warmest place in the UK according to stats given out on the late night BBC Radio 4 weather forecast, when Lee-on-Solent, Gosport, is frequently sited and as we are only a few miles west, we enjoy the clement conditions also. To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
Re: uppdate gold wave skript
Hello, it's nice to see you wish to update the JAWS scripts for goldwave, here we have a team as Jim grimsby, ramkumar and myself Jitendra, ram and me are from India, and Jim is from US, so tell us what feature you are missing, or what set of scripts and functions or code you have ready to test for us. however, grab the latest code, and start adding in it. please don't disregard directions in the readme file, and write-down your changes and/or added features, and send us for testing. Thank you, Jitendra. On 6/30/11, Bardia wrote: > how can i uppdate the gold wave skripts for jaws > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > -- Skype: Jeet.delhi To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
