RE: cdex questions

2011-11-09 Thread Jim Ruby
From what I have heard so far things are going well, but I would like to
read that article about drive calibration..

-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Kelly Pierce
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 6:52 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: cdex questions

sunshine,

EAC can scan a CD at least 20 times to compare the integrity of each
sector. If EAC obtains identical readings on the same sector, it uses
that data. If not, it keeps reading the sector on the CD to obtain a
wave form closest to the original recording.  In addition, it is
possible to calibrate most CD drives so EAC compensates for the offset
from the manufacturer.  the multiple reads and the offset feature
along with precise control of the Lame CODEC produces excellent rips
that cannot be surpassed.

Jim,

after the initial set up and familiarization, configure Lame to your
own taste, presets are recommended, insert your naming conventions,
and calibrate your player with EAC. There is a long article on drive
calibration on line that i used to calibrate my drive.  After that,
try a test rip and listen to the results.  Realize EAC rips take
longer than the quick and dirty rips done in itunes or Windows Media,
but the results are far superior.  I have a computer dedicated to PC
Audio so this is not an issue for me.

Kelly

On 11/6/11, Jim Ruby j...@blindsea.com wrote:
 Yes, I went through the wizard and am working with it today, I read the
faq
 and hints and tips, any suggestions?



 -Original Message-
 From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
 On Behalf Of Sunshine
 Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 11:52 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: cdex questions

 how do you get the ultimate rips with eac?
 - Original Message -
 From: Kelly Pierce kellyt...@gmail.com
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 9:10 PM
 Subject: Re: cdex questions


 I have said numerous times on this list that Exact Audio Copy with the
 current versions of Lame and FLAC deliver the best CD rips in the
 world.  I continue to stand behind these comments as nothing better
 has emerged.  Yes, EAC requires a steep learning curve, but the
 program is fully accessible as well as the documentation.  I was able
 to even calibrate my CD player according to online directions without
 sighted assistance.

 ffor flawless rips that you will enjoy for decades, EAC cannot be
 matched. It is still recommended by the major torrent services and the
 most well regarded file sharers and syndicators use EAC as their tool
 of choice.

 Kelly

 On 11/5/11, Jim Ruby j...@blindsea.com wrote:
 Anyone having problems with cdex 70 beta 4? Tried it and window-eyes was
 very very slow using we v7.5.1

 If there is something better to rip then cdex or a way to resolve the
slow
 with we I'm all ears.

 Thanks.



 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


RE: cdex questions

2011-11-09 Thread Tim Crawford
Hi Kelly,

I wonder have you upgraded to the latest version of eac?  I've been using
ver 0.9pb5 here for quite a while  
And never felt the need to change.

Now having to install eac on a new pc, I'd be interested to know if there
are any accessability issues with version 1.02 which I believe is the latest
version.

Best regards,


Tim.

Bangor, N. Ireland.

Skype:  tim_crawford
 
-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Jim Ruby
Sent: 09 November 2011 14:23
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: cdex questions

From what I have heard so far things are going well, but I would like to
read that article about drive calibration..

-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Kelly Pierce
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 6:52 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: cdex questions

sunshine,

EAC can scan a CD at least 20 times to compare the integrity of each sector.
If EAC obtains identical readings on the same sector, it uses that data. If
not, it keeps reading the sector on the CD to obtain a wave form closest to
the original recording.  In addition, it is possible to calibrate most CD
drives so EAC compensates for the offset from the manufacturer.  the
multiple reads and the offset feature along with precise control of the Lame
CODEC produces excellent rips that cannot be surpassed.

Jim,

after the initial set up and familiarization, configure Lame to your own
taste, presets are recommended, insert your naming conventions, and
calibrate your player with EAC. There is a long article on drive calibration
on line that i used to calibrate my drive.  After that, try a test rip and
listen to the results.  Realize EAC rips take longer than the quick and
dirty rips done in itunes or Windows Media, but the results are far
superior.  I have a computer dedicated to PC Audio so this is not an issue
for me.

Kelly

On 11/6/11, Jim Ruby j...@blindsea.com wrote:
 Yes, I went through the wizard and am working with it today, I read 
 the
faq
 and hints and tips, any suggestions?



 -Original Message-
 From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org 
 [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
 On Behalf Of Sunshine
 Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 11:52 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: cdex questions

 how do you get the ultimate rips with eac?
 - Original Message -
 From: Kelly Pierce kellyt...@gmail.com
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 9:10 PM
 Subject: Re: cdex questions


 I have said numerous times on this list that Exact Audio Copy with the 
 current versions of Lame and FLAC deliver the best CD rips in the 
 world.  I continue to stand behind these comments as nothing better 
 has emerged.  Yes, EAC requires a steep learning curve, but the 
 program is fully accessible as well as the documentation.  I was able 
 to even calibrate my CD player according to online directions without 
 sighted assistance.

 ffor flawless rips that you will enjoy for decades, EAC cannot be 
 matched. It is still recommended by the major torrent services and the 
 most well regarded file sharers and syndicators use EAC as their tool 
 of choice.

 Kelly

 On 11/5/11, Jim Ruby j...@blindsea.com wrote:
 Anyone having problems with cdex 70 beta 4? Tried it and window-eyes 
 was very very slow using we v7.5.1

 If there is something better to rip then cdex or a way to resolve the
slow
 with we I'm all ears.

 Thanks.



 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: cdex questions

2011-11-08 Thread Kelly Pierce
sunshine,

EAC can scan a CD at least 20 times to compare the integrity of each
sector. If EAC obtains identical readings on the same sector, it uses
that data. If not, it keeps reading the sector on the CD to obtain a
wave form closest to the original recording.  In addition, it is
possible to calibrate most CD drives so EAC compensates for the offset
from the manufacturer.  the multiple reads and the offset feature
along with precise control of the Lame CODEC produces excellent rips
that cannot be surpassed.

Jim,

after the initial set up and familiarization, configure Lame to your
own taste, presets are recommended, insert your naming conventions,
and calibrate your player with EAC. There is a long article on drive
calibration on line that i used to calibrate my drive.  After that,
try a test rip and listen to the results.  Realize EAC rips take
longer than the quick and dirty rips done in itunes or Windows Media,
but the results are far superior.  I have a computer dedicated to PC
Audio so this is not an issue for me.

Kelly

On 11/6/11, Jim Ruby j...@blindsea.com wrote:
 Yes, I went through the wizard and am working with it today, I read the faq
 and hints and tips, any suggestions?



 -Original Message-
 From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
 On Behalf Of Sunshine
 Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 11:52 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: cdex questions

 how do you get the ultimate rips with eac?
 - Original Message -
 From: Kelly Pierce kellyt...@gmail.com
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 9:10 PM
 Subject: Re: cdex questions


 I have said numerous times on this list that Exact Audio Copy with the
 current versions of Lame and FLAC deliver the best CD rips in the
 world.  I continue to stand behind these comments as nothing better
 has emerged.  Yes, EAC requires a steep learning curve, but the
 program is fully accessible as well as the documentation.  I was able
 to even calibrate my CD player according to online directions without
 sighted assistance.

 ffor flawless rips that you will enjoy for decades, EAC cannot be
 matched. It is still recommended by the major torrent services and the
 most well regarded file sharers and syndicators use EAC as their tool
 of choice.

 Kelly

 On 11/5/11, Jim Ruby j...@blindsea.com wrote:
 Anyone having problems with cdex 70 beta 4? Tried it and window-eyes was
 very very slow using we v7.5.1

 If there is something better to rip then cdex or a way to resolve the slow
 with we I'm all ears.

 Thanks.



 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: cdex questions

2011-11-08 Thread Sunshine
can you send that article?
- Original Message - 
From: Kelly Pierce kellyt...@gmail.com
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: cdex questions


sunshine,

EAC can scan a CD at least 20 times to compare the integrity of each
sector. If EAC obtains identical readings on the same sector, it uses
that data. If not, it keeps reading the sector on the CD to obtain a
wave form closest to the original recording.  In addition, it is
possible to calibrate most CD drives so EAC compensates for the offset
from the manufacturer.  the multiple reads and the offset feature
along with precise control of the Lame CODEC produces excellent rips
that cannot be surpassed.

Jim,

after the initial set up and familiarization, configure Lame to your
own taste, presets are recommended, insert your naming conventions,
and calibrate your player with EAC. There is a long article on drive
calibration on line that i used to calibrate my drive.  After that,
try a test rip and listen to the results.  Realize EAC rips take
longer than the quick and dirty rips done in itunes or Windows Media,
but the results are far superior.  I have a computer dedicated to PC
Audio so this is not an issue for me.

Kelly

On 11/6/11, Jim Ruby j...@blindsea.com wrote:
 Yes, I went through the wizard and am working with it today, I read the 
 faq
 and hints and tips, any suggestions?



 -Original Message-
 From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
 On Behalf Of Sunshine
 Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 11:52 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: cdex questions

 how do you get the ultimate rips with eac?
 - Original Message -
 From: Kelly Pierce kellyt...@gmail.com
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 9:10 PM
 Subject: Re: cdex questions


 I have said numerous times on this list that Exact Audio Copy with the
 current versions of Lame and FLAC deliver the best CD rips in the
 world.  I continue to stand behind these comments as nothing better
 has emerged.  Yes, EAC requires a steep learning curve, but the
 program is fully accessible as well as the documentation.  I was able
 to even calibrate my CD player according to online directions without
 sighted assistance.

 ffor flawless rips that you will enjoy for decades, EAC cannot be
 matched. It is still recommended by the major torrent services and the
 most well regarded file sharers and syndicators use EAC as their tool
 of choice.

 Kelly

 On 11/5/11, Jim Ruby j...@blindsea.com wrote:
 Anyone having problems with cdex 70 beta 4? Tried it and window-eyes was
 very very slow using we v7.5.1

 If there is something better to rip then cdex or a way to resolve the 
 slow
 with we I'm all ears.

 Thanks.



 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


RE: cdex questions

2011-11-06 Thread Jim Ruby
Yes, I went through the wizard and am working with it today, I read the faq
and hints and tips, any suggestions?



-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Sunshine
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 11:52 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: cdex questions

how do you get the ultimate rips with eac?
- Original Message - 
From: Kelly Pierce kellyt...@gmail.com
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: cdex questions


I have said numerous times on this list that Exact Audio Copy with the
current versions of Lame and FLAC deliver the best CD rips in the
world.  I continue to stand behind these comments as nothing better
has emerged.  Yes, EAC requires a steep learning curve, but the
program is fully accessible as well as the documentation.  I was able
to even calibrate my CD player according to online directions without
sighted assistance.

ffor flawless rips that you will enjoy for decades, EAC cannot be
matched. It is still recommended by the major torrent services and the
most well regarded file sharers and syndicators use EAC as their tool
of choice.

Kelly

On 11/5/11, Jim Ruby j...@blindsea.com wrote:
 Anyone having problems with cdex 70 beta 4? Tried it and window-eyes was
 very very slow using we v7.5.1

 If there is something better to rip then cdex or a way to resolve the slow
 with we I'm all ears.

 Thanks.



 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


cdex questions

2011-11-05 Thread Jim Ruby
Anyone having problems with cdex 70 beta 4? Tried it and window-eyes was
very very slow using we v7.5.1

If there is something better to rip then cdex or a way to resolve the slow
with we I'm all ears.

Thanks.



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: cdex questions

2011-11-05 Thread Jörgen Hansson

Hello!
why not try audio grabber?
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
- Original Message - 
From: Jim Ruby j...@blindsea.com

To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 2:03 AM
Subject: cdex questions



Anyone having problems with cdex 70 beta 4? Tried it and window-eyes was
very very slow using we v7.5.1

If there is something better to rip then cdex or a way to resolve the slow
with we I'm all ears.

Thanks.



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: cdex questions

2011-11-05 Thread Kelly Pierce
I have said numerous times on this list that Exact Audio Copy with the
current versions of Lame and FLAC deliver the best CD rips in the
world.  I continue to stand behind these comments as nothing better
has emerged.  Yes, EAC requires a steep learning curve, but the
program is fully accessible as well as the documentation.  I was able
to even calibrate my CD player according to online directions without
sighted assistance.

ffor flawless rips that you will enjoy for decades, EAC cannot be
matched. It is still recommended by the major torrent services and the
most well regarded file sharers and syndicators use EAC as their tool
of choice.

Kelly

On 11/5/11, Jim Ruby j...@blindsea.com wrote:
 Anyone having problems with cdex 70 beta 4? Tried it and window-eyes was
 very very slow using we v7.5.1

 If there is something better to rip then cdex or a way to resolve the slow
 with we I'm all ears.

 Thanks.



 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: cdex questions

2011-11-05 Thread Byron Stephens
Also free mp3 ripper is good as well, and you can get it from 
www.whitestick.co.uk.
- Original Message - 
From: Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: cdex questions


Hello!
why not try audio grabber?
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
- Original Message - 
From: Jim Ruby j...@blindsea.com

To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 2:03 AM
Subject: cdex questions



Anyone having problems with cdex 70 beta 4? Tried it and window-eyes was
very very slow using we v7.5.1

If there is something better to rip then cdex or a way to resolve the slow
with we I'm all ears.

Thanks.



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 



To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: cdex questions

2011-11-05 Thread Sunshine
how do you get the ultimate rips with eac?
- Original Message - 
From: Kelly Pierce kellyt...@gmail.com
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: cdex questions


I have said numerous times on this list that Exact Audio Copy with the
current versions of Lame and FLAC deliver the best CD rips in the
world.  I continue to stand behind these comments as nothing better
has emerged.  Yes, EAC requires a steep learning curve, but the
program is fully accessible as well as the documentation.  I was able
to even calibrate my CD player according to online directions without
sighted assistance.

ffor flawless rips that you will enjoy for decades, EAC cannot be
matched. It is still recommended by the major torrent services and the
most well regarded file sharers and syndicators use EAC as their tool
of choice.

Kelly

On 11/5/11, Jim Ruby j...@blindsea.com wrote:
 Anyone having problems with cdex 70 beta 4? Tried it and window-eyes was
 very very slow using we v7.5.1

 If there is something better to rip then cdex or a way to resolve the slow
 with we I'm all ears.

 Thanks.



 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


Re: Some CDEX questions

2007-09-04 Thread Kelly Pierce
No, the popular commercial programs do not do this, likely because it takes 
a lot longer to produce a higher quality rip than one of average quality. 
While fully accessible, EAC has so many configuration options that it is a 
geek's paradise.

There is a lot of documentation available online in accessible format. The 
program can be operated from the keyboard, and all the menus can be 
accessed with a screen reader.

Kelly


- Original Message - 
From: GianniP46 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 11:48 PM
Subject: Re: Some CDEX questions


 Does winamp, windows media, or ITunes have error correction, wave form 
 comparison, or rescanning of tracks?  Or is eac the only program that 
 does this.  Will definitely look in to it.
  - Original Message - 
  From: Kelly Pierce
  To: PC Audio Discussion List
  Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 11:26 PM
  Subject: Re: Some CDEX questions


  Not necessarily.  CDEX doesn't have error correction and wave form
  comparison, rescanning the same track two dozen times.  EAC can often
  salvage a scratched disc.  there is much discussion on the Internet
  comparing the two programs, check it out.

  Kelly

  - Original Message - 
  From: GianniP46 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
  Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 9:49 PM
  Subject: Re: Some CDEX questions


  a lot of my D.J. friends are ripping in either I tunes or windows media
  player at about 192 or 256.  If I use CDEX with the insane settings 
 wont
  that be just as good if not better?
- Original Message - 
From: Kelly Pierce
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: Some CDEX questions
  
  
if you really want the highest quality rips possible, use Exact Audio
   copy
with the Lame extreme preset.  With the current version of Lame,
   variable
bit rates with joint stereo deliver the extra fullness and richness 
 when
   it
is needed.  EAC does offer a preset for 320 CBR, but the developer 
 calls
this setting insane.
  
EAC, unlike CDEX, scans each track, looking for two exactly identical
   wave
forms or the closest exact match possible.  It repeatedly scans a 
 tract,
dozens of times if needed, before ripping it.  CDEX does not perform
   this
error checking analysis.
  
If you want the best rips in town, use EAC.  It takes longer to 
 learn,
   but
the rips sound really great.  CDEX is easy to use and I still rip 
 audio
books with it.  For industrial strength music output, I use EAC.
  
Kelly
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: GianniP46 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PCAudioList pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 7:46 PM
Subject: Some CDEX questions
  
  
 Hi,
 I got cdex installed, but I have some questions about the
   configuration
 options.  What is the best quality setting for MP3s?  I want my
   bitrates
 to be 320 at a constant bitrate as I heard that constant bitrates 
 are
   the
 best.  Is that true? Is CBR the best?
 Is it good to enable jitter correction?
 Also, What is the best ripping method to use.  I want to create the
   best
 mp3s with the highest quality possible with no artifacts.  I am a 
 D.J.
 and will be using my mp3s for gigs.  Thanks to all in advance!



 Gian Carlo Pedulla
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 LETS! GO! METS!

 Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
http://www.pc-audio.org
  
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.3/986 - Release Date: 
 9/3/2007
   9:31 AM
  
  
   Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
   http://www.pc-audio.org
  
   To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
  http://www.pc-audio.org

  To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  -- 
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.3/986 - Release Date: 9/3/2007 
 9:31 AM


 Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Some CDEX questions

2007-09-04 Thread Kevin Lloyd
Hi.

Windows media player has error correction so be sure to set it if you're 
using this program to rip audio CD's.  It will rip much more slowly when 
this is enabled but you will get excellent results.

To set the error correction flag,
go to tools, options and locate the audio tab.  Press enter on the 
properties button for your CD/DVD drives and then check the checkboxes to 
set error correction on.

The CD transport in your computer is key to getting good results.  As 
mentioned, EAC will scan until it finds 2 close matches in extracted WAV 
forms but that doesn't mean that it's perfect as if your CD transport isn't 
great then you'll get some very close imperfect WAV files and it'll have 
just taken you longer to get there.

I've found laptops have the best CD transports as they tend to have a raised 
middle onto which you can press the CD and have it held firmly.  CD 
transports I've seen on desktops have been quite flimsy at times and the 
disc can slide about when spinning.  This is a great way to generate lots of 
jitter, particularly on the latter tracks which are on the outside of the 
disc and so are therefore being rocked around a lot more than the inner 
tracks on a flimsy transport.

Regards.

Kevin
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - 
From: GianniP46 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 5:48 AM
Subject: Re: Some CDEX questions


 Does winamp, windows media, or ITunes have error correction, wave form 
 comparison, or rescanning of tracks?  Or is eac the only program that does 
 this.  Will definitely look in to it.
  - Original Message - 
  From: Kelly Pierce
  To: PC Audio Discussion List
  Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 11:26 PM
  Subject: Re: Some CDEX questions


  Not necessarily.  CDEX doesn't have error correction and wave form
  comparison, rescanning the same track two dozen times.  EAC can often
  salvage a scratched disc.  there is much discussion on the Internet
  comparing the two programs, check it out.

  Kelly

  - Original Message - 
  From: GianniP46 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
  Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 9:49 PM
  Subject: Re: Some CDEX questions


  a lot of my D.J. friends are ripping in either I tunes or windows media
  player at about 192 or 256.  If I use CDEX with the insane settings wont
  that be just as good if not better?
- Original Message - 
From: Kelly Pierce
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: Some CDEX questions
  
  
if you really want the highest quality rips possible, use Exact Audio
   copy
with the Lame extreme preset.  With the current version of Lame,
   variable
bit rates with joint stereo deliver the extra fullness and richness 
 when
   it
is needed.  EAC does offer a preset for 320 CBR, but the developer 
 calls
this setting insane.
  
EAC, unlike CDEX, scans each track, looking for two exactly identical
   wave
forms or the closest exact match possible.  It repeatedly scans a 
 tract,
dozens of times if needed, before ripping it.  CDEX does not perform
   this
error checking analysis.
  
If you want the best rips in town, use EAC.  It takes longer to learn,
   but
the rips sound really great.  CDEX is easy to use and I still rip 
 audio
books with it.  For industrial strength music output, I use EAC.
  
Kelly
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: GianniP46 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PCAudioList pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 7:46 PM
Subject: Some CDEX questions
  
  
 Hi,
 I got cdex installed, but I have some questions about the
   configuration
 options.  What is the best quality setting for MP3s?  I want my
   bitrates
 to be 320 at a constant bitrate as I heard that constant bitrates 
 are
   the
 best.  Is that true? Is CBR the best?
 Is it good to enable jitter correction?
 Also, What is the best ripping method to use.  I want to create the
   best
 mp3s with the highest quality possible with no artifacts.  I am a 
 D.J.
 and will be using my mp3s for gigs.  Thanks to all in advance!



 Gian Carlo Pedulla
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 LETS! GO! METS!

 Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
http://www.pc-audio.org
  
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.3/986 - Release Date: 
 9/3/2007
   9:31 AM
  
  
   Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
   http://www.pc-audio.org

RE: Some CDEX questions

2007-09-03 Thread albert griffith
I 'm new at this but I  believe Variable bit rate would serve you better.   

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of GianniP46
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 5:47 PM
To: PCAudioList
Subject: Some CDEX questions

Hi,
I got cdex installed, but I have some questions about the configuration
options.  What is the best quality setting for MP3s?  I want my bitrates to
be 320 at a constant bitrate as I heard that constant bitrates are the best.
Is that true? Is CBR the best?
Is it good to enable jitter correction?
Also, What is the best ripping method to use.  I want to create the best
mp3s with the highest quality possible with no artifacts.  I am a D.J. and
will be using my mp3s for gigs.  Thanks to all in advance!



Gian Carlo Pedulla
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

LETS! GO! METS!

Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Some CDEX questions

2007-09-03 Thread Kelly Pierce
if you really want the highest quality rips possible, use Exact Audio copy 
with the Lame extreme preset.  With the current version of Lame, variable 
bit rates with joint stereo deliver the extra fullness and richness when it 
is needed.  EAC does offer a preset for 320 CBR, but the developer calls 
this setting insane.

EAC, unlike CDEX, scans each track, looking for two exactly identical wave 
forms or the closest exact match possible.  It repeatedly scans a tract, 
dozens of times if needed, before ripping it.  CDEX does not perform this 
error checking analysis.

If you want the best rips in town, use EAC.  It takes longer to learn, but 
the rips sound really great.  CDEX is easy to use and I still rip audio 
books with it.  For industrial strength music output, I use EAC.

Kelly


- Original Message - 
From: GianniP46 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PCAudioList pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 7:46 PM
Subject: Some CDEX questions


 Hi,
 I got cdex installed, but I have some questions about the configuration 
 options.  What is the best quality setting for MP3s?  I want my bitrates 
 to be 320 at a constant bitrate as I heard that constant bitrates are the 
 best.  Is that true? Is CBR the best?
 Is it good to enable jitter correction?
 Also, What is the best ripping method to use.  I want to create the best 
 mp3s with the highest quality possible with no artifacts.  I am a D.J. 
 and will be using my mp3s for gigs.  Thanks to all in advance!



 Gian Carlo Pedulla
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 LETS! GO! METS!

 Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Some CDEX questions

2007-09-03 Thread GianniP46
where can I get it?
  - Original Message - 
  From: Kelly Pierce 
  To: PC Audio Discussion List 
  Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 10:21 PM
  Subject: Re: Some CDEX questions


  if you really want the highest quality rips possible, use Exact Audio copy 
  with the Lame extreme preset.  With the current version of Lame, variable 
  bit rates with joint stereo deliver the extra fullness and richness when it 
  is needed.  EAC does offer a preset for 320 CBR, but the developer calls 
  this setting insane.

  EAC, unlike CDEX, scans each track, looking for two exactly identical wave 
  forms or the closest exact match possible.  It repeatedly scans a tract, 
  dozens of times if needed, before ripping it.  CDEX does not perform this 
  error checking analysis.

  If you want the best rips in town, use EAC.  It takes longer to learn, but 
  the rips sound really great.  CDEX is easy to use and I still rip audio 
  books with it.  For industrial strength music output, I use EAC.

  Kelly


  - Original Message - 
  From: GianniP46 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: PCAudioList pc-audio@pc-audio.org
  Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 7:46 PM
  Subject: Some CDEX questions


   Hi,
   I got cdex installed, but I have some questions about the configuration 
   options.  What is the best quality setting for MP3s?  I want my bitrates 
   to be 320 at a constant bitrate as I heard that constant bitrates are the 
   best.  Is that true? Is CBR the best?
   Is it good to enable jitter correction?
   Also, What is the best ripping method to use.  I want to create the best 
   mp3s with the highest quality possible with no artifacts.  I am a D.J. 
   and will be using my mp3s for gigs.  Thanks to all in advance!
  
  
  
   Gian Carlo Pedulla
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   LETS! GO! METS!
  
   Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
   http://www.pc-audio.org
  
   To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



  Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
  http://www.pc-audio.org

  To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  -- 
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
  Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.3/986 - Release Date: 9/3/2007 9:31 
AM


Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Some CDEX questions

2007-09-03 Thread GianniP46
a lot of my D.J. friends are ripping in either I tunes or windows media player 
at about 192 or 256.  If I use CDEX with the insane settings wont that be just 
as good if not better?
  - Original Message - 
  From: Kelly Pierce 
  To: PC Audio Discussion List 
  Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 10:21 PM
  Subject: Re: Some CDEX questions


  if you really want the highest quality rips possible, use Exact Audio copy 
  with the Lame extreme preset.  With the current version of Lame, variable 
  bit rates with joint stereo deliver the extra fullness and richness when it 
  is needed.  EAC does offer a preset for 320 CBR, but the developer calls 
  this setting insane.

  EAC, unlike CDEX, scans each track, looking for two exactly identical wave 
  forms or the closest exact match possible.  It repeatedly scans a tract, 
  dozens of times if needed, before ripping it.  CDEX does not perform this 
  error checking analysis.

  If you want the best rips in town, use EAC.  It takes longer to learn, but 
  the rips sound really great.  CDEX is easy to use and I still rip audio 
  books with it.  For industrial strength music output, I use EAC.

  Kelly


  - Original Message - 
  From: GianniP46 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: PCAudioList pc-audio@pc-audio.org
  Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 7:46 PM
  Subject: Some CDEX questions


   Hi,
   I got cdex installed, but I have some questions about the configuration 
   options.  What is the best quality setting for MP3s?  I want my bitrates 
   to be 320 at a constant bitrate as I heard that constant bitrates are the 
   best.  Is that true? Is CBR the best?
   Is it good to enable jitter correction?
   Also, What is the best ripping method to use.  I want to create the best 
   mp3s with the highest quality possible with no artifacts.  I am a D.J. 
   and will be using my mp3s for gigs.  Thanks to all in advance!
  
  
  
   Gian Carlo Pedulla
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   LETS! GO! METS!
  
   Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
   http://www.pc-audio.org
  
   To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



  Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
  http://www.pc-audio.org

  To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  -- 
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
  Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.3/986 - Release Date: 9/3/2007 9:31 
AM


Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Some CDEX questions

2007-09-03 Thread Kelly Pierce
Not necessarily.  CDEX doesn't have error correction and wave form 
comparison, rescanning the same track two dozen times.  EAC can often 
salvage a scratched disc.  there is much discussion on the Internet 
comparing the two programs, check it out.

Kelly

- Original Message - 
From: GianniP46 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: Some CDEX questions


a lot of my D.J. friends are ripping in either I tunes or windows media 
player at about 192 or 256.  If I use CDEX with the insane settings wont 
that be just as good if not better?
  - Original Message - 
  From: Kelly Pierce
  To: PC Audio Discussion List
  Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 10:21 PM
  Subject: Re: Some CDEX questions


  if you really want the highest quality rips possible, use Exact Audio 
 copy
  with the Lame extreme preset.  With the current version of Lame, 
 variable
  bit rates with joint stereo deliver the extra fullness and richness when 
 it
  is needed.  EAC does offer a preset for 320 CBR, but the developer calls
  this setting insane.

  EAC, unlike CDEX, scans each track, looking for two exactly identical 
 wave
  forms or the closest exact match possible.  It repeatedly scans a tract,
  dozens of times if needed, before ripping it.  CDEX does not perform 
 this
  error checking analysis.

  If you want the best rips in town, use EAC.  It takes longer to learn, 
 but
  the rips sound really great.  CDEX is easy to use and I still rip audio
  books with it.  For industrial strength music output, I use EAC.

  Kelly


  - Original Message - 
  From: GianniP46 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: PCAudioList pc-audio@pc-audio.org
  Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 7:46 PM
  Subject: Some CDEX questions


   Hi,
   I got cdex installed, but I have some questions about the 
 configuration
   options.  What is the best quality setting for MP3s?  I want my 
 bitrates
   to be 320 at a constant bitrate as I heard that constant bitrates are 
 the
   best.  Is that true? Is CBR the best?
   Is it good to enable jitter correction?
   Also, What is the best ripping method to use.  I want to create the 
 best
   mp3s with the highest quality possible with no artifacts.  I am a D.J.
   and will be using my mp3s for gigs.  Thanks to all in advance!
  
  
  
   Gian Carlo Pedulla
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   LETS! GO! METS!
  
   Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
   http://www.pc-audio.org
  
   To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
  http://www.pc-audio.org

  To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  -- 
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.3/986 - Release Date: 9/3/2007 
 9:31 AM


 Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Some CDEX questions

2007-09-03 Thread GianniP46
Does winamp, windows media, or ITunes have error correction, wave form 
comparison, or rescanning of tracks?  Or is eac the only program that does 
this.  Will definitely look in to it.
  - Original Message - 
  From: Kelly Pierce 
  To: PC Audio Discussion List 
  Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 11:26 PM
  Subject: Re: Some CDEX questions


  Not necessarily.  CDEX doesn't have error correction and wave form 
  comparison, rescanning the same track two dozen times.  EAC can often 
  salvage a scratched disc.  there is much discussion on the Internet 
  comparing the two programs, check it out.

  Kelly

  - Original Message - 
  From: GianniP46 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
  Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 9:49 PM
  Subject: Re: Some CDEX questions


  a lot of my D.J. friends are ripping in either I tunes or windows media 
  player at about 192 or 256.  If I use CDEX with the insane settings wont 
  that be just as good if not better?
- Original Message - 
From: Kelly Pierce
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: Some CDEX questions
  
  
if you really want the highest quality rips possible, use Exact Audio 
   copy
with the Lame extreme preset.  With the current version of Lame, 
   variable
bit rates with joint stereo deliver the extra fullness and richness when 
   it
is needed.  EAC does offer a preset for 320 CBR, but the developer calls
this setting insane.
  
EAC, unlike CDEX, scans each track, looking for two exactly identical 
   wave
forms or the closest exact match possible.  It repeatedly scans a tract,
dozens of times if needed, before ripping it.  CDEX does not perform 
   this
error checking analysis.
  
If you want the best rips in town, use EAC.  It takes longer to learn, 
   but
the rips sound really great.  CDEX is easy to use and I still rip audio
books with it.  For industrial strength music output, I use EAC.
  
Kelly
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: GianniP46 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PCAudioList pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 7:46 PM
Subject: Some CDEX questions
  
  
 Hi,
 I got cdex installed, but I have some questions about the 
   configuration
 options.  What is the best quality setting for MP3s?  I want my 
   bitrates
 to be 320 at a constant bitrate as I heard that constant bitrates are 
   the
 best.  Is that true? Is CBR the best?
 Is it good to enable jitter correction?
 Also, What is the best ripping method to use.  I want to create the 
   best
 mp3s with the highest quality possible with no artifacts.  I am a D.J.
 and will be using my mp3s for gigs.  Thanks to all in advance!



 Gian Carlo Pedulla
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 LETS! GO! METS!

 Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
http://www.pc-audio.org
  
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.3/986 - Release Date: 9/3/2007 
   9:31 AM
  
  
   Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
   http://www.pc-audio.org
  
   To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



  Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
  http://www.pc-audio.org

  To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  -- 
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
  Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.3/986 - Release Date: 9/3/2007 9:31 
AM


Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]