Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05
Hi WG, I support WG adoption of this draft since it is an important work that fills in the gap of multipath support in PCEP. Thank you for your help on progressing this work! Best regards, Shuping From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 10:52 PM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-koldychev-pce-multip...@ietf.org Subject: WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05 Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05 Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Wednesday 28th April. Thanks! Dhruv & Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05
Yes, the draft should be adopted. It addresses a crucial gap in the TE multipath toolkit. Regards, -Pavan (as a co-author) On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 9:53 AM Dhruv Dhody wrote: > Hi WG, > > This email begins the WG adoption poll for > draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05 > > Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - > Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you > willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the > list. > > Please respond by Wednesday 28th April. > > Thanks! > Dhruv & Julien > ___ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
