Re: [Pce] Supporting PCEP-LS work as PCE WG's WG item

[윤빈영]

Hi,


We have implemented PCEP-LS for packet optical network which was demonstrated 
in IETF 97 B&B. The inter-operability of PCEP-LS was demonstrated across ETRI, 
KT and Woori-Net. I support PCEP-LS to be adopted in the PCE WG.


We think that PCEP can provide one of ways to implement all of the main 
functions of SDN controller.

So, we want PCE WG to provide a total solution to implement SDN controller as 
much as it can

rather than using other WG's protocols such as BGP-LS.


Thanks.

BIn



보낸 사람 : "박춘걸(Transport SDN Project)" 
보낸 날짜 : 2016-11-25 09:19:42 ( +09:00 )
받는 사람 : pce@ietf.org 
참조 :
제목 : [Pce] Supporting PCEP-LS work as PCE WG's WG item


Dear experts of PCE WG,
I’m Peter Park one of a senior researcher of KT Infra Lab.
During IETF B&B in Seoul, KT demonstrated resilient ACTN architecture with ETRI 
and other vendor using PCEP-LS using PCEP-LS for packet optical network to 
quickly determined network failure and reported to the MDSC using PCEP Report 
mechanism.
I believe PCEP-LS is an important work for us.
And I strongly support PCEP-LS to be considered as PCE WG’s WG item
Thank you,
Peter

Dr. Peter(Choongul) Park
Senior Researcher / KT Infra Lab.
463-1 Cheonmindong Yuseonggu Daejeon Korea(South)
T: +82.10.2879.7463 / F: +82.42.870.8089




이 메일은 지정된 수취인만을 위해 작성되었으며, 중요한 정보나 저작권을 포함하고 있을 수 있습니다. 어떠한 권한 없이, 본 문서에 포함된 
정보의 전부 또는 일부를 무단으로 제3자에게 공개, 배포, 복사 또는 사용하는 것을 엄격히 금지합니다. 만약, 본 메일이 잘못 전송된 경우, 
발신인 또는 당사에 알려주시고, 본 메일을 즉시 삭제하여 주시기 바랍니다.



This E-mail may contain confidential information and/or copyright material. 
This email is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you receive this 
email by mistake, please either delete it without reproducing, distributing or 
retaining copies thereof or notify the sender immediately.
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhody-pce-applicability-actn-02

[윤빈영]

Yes/Support.

Sincerely yours,
Binyeong

From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 1:26 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-dhody-pce-applicability-a...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhody-pce-applicability-actn-02

All,

This is the start of a two week poll on making 
draft-dhody-pce-applicability-actn-02 a PCE working group document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-applicability-actn/


Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” 
or “no/do not support”.  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.



The poll ends on Tuesday, May 9.



Many thanks,
Jon


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-hpce

[윤빈영]

Yes/Support.

Regards,
Bin

From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 9:25 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-h...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-hpce

All,

This is the start of a two week poll on making 
draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-hpce-03 a PCE working group document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-hpce/


Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” 
or “no/do not support”.  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.



The poll ends on Thursday, June 15.



Many thanks,
Jon

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Adoption poll for draft-lee-pce-flexible-grid

[윤빈영]

Hi Adrian,


Yes/Support.

I think that this document is valuable for the PCE to support the full control 
functions

over transport networks(including the flexgrid case).


Best regards,


Bin






보낸 사람 : "Adrian Farrel" 
보낸 날짜 : 2019-02-05 23:16:44 ( +09:00 )
받는 사람 : pce@ietf.org 
참조 :
제목 : [Pce] Adoption poll for draft-lee-pce-flexible-grid



Hi WG,





Please read and review draft-lee-pce-flexible-grid-03 and send your comments



to the mailing list.





Should we adopt it? Why / why not?





What needs to be fixed before/after adoption?





Is this a draft you would be willing to work on? Do you plan to implement?





This poll will run until 20th February.





Thanks,



PCE Chairs





___



Pce mailing list



Pce@ietf.org



https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call completed for draft-ietf-pce-applicability-actn

[윤빈영]

Dear Adrian and WG,


I have reviewed the draft.

I support the publication.


Best regards,

Bin






보낸 사람 : "Adrian Farrel" 
보낸 날짜 : 2019-02-25 21:55:15 ( +09:00 )
받는 사람 : pce@ietf.org 
참조 :
제목 : [Pce] WG Last Call completed for draft-ietf-pce-applicability-actn



Hi,





The WG last call completed without any dissent, but with only a few comments



of support.





There were some issues raised (including from Dan and me).





Authors:



Please post a revision that addresses the comments.





Working Group:



Please continue to send messages of support so that we know that this draft



really should be advanced.





Thanks,



Adrian





-Original Message-



From: Pce On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel



Sent: 08 February 2019 11:34



To: pce@ietf.org



Subject: [Pce] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-pce-applicability-actn





Hi WG,





draft-ietf-pce-applicability-actn seems to be ready to progress towards



publication.





This email starts a two week working group last call (ends on 23rd



February).





During this time, please read the draft and make comments for improvement.



If you then support its publication please let us know that you have read



the draft and support it. If you have any concerns, please let us know and



propose solutions.





Thanks,



Adrian





___



Pce mailing list



Pce@ietf.org



https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce





___



Pce mailing list



Pce@ietf.org



https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association

[윤빈영]

Yes/Support.


I think that it is useful to provide a solution for VN service based on PCE.


Best regards,

Bin






보낸 사람 : "Adrian Farrel" 
보낸 날짜 : 2019-07-14 22:01:05 ( +09:00 )
받는 사람 : pce@ietf.org 
참조 : draft-leedhody-pce-vn-associat...@ietf.org 

제목 : [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association



Hi WG,





He authors of draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association have been asking for



adoption and...





- the base PCEP association extensions seem to be stable and advancing



- I did an early review and the authors span a new version





So, this starts an adoption poll for the draft. Because IETF-105 is imminent



and you all have lots to do and read, we'll make this a three week poll



ending on 4th August.





Please send your comments of support or antipathy.





In either case, please indicate whether or not you have read the draft, and



if you support it, please say whether or not you propose to and even



possibly implement the draft.





Many thanks,



Adrian (for the chairs)





___



Pce mailing list



Pce@ietf.org



https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-te-data-extn

[윤빈영]

Hi Gyan,

We have implemented PCEP in the past. 
This experimental upgrade of PCEP to enable direct TE updates to PCE is worth 
to try and we'd be interested in the implementation of this work.

Regards,
Bin

From: Gyan Mishra   Sent: Thursday, March 18, 
2021 11:36 AM To: pce@ietf.org; draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep...@ietf.org; Dhruv 
Dhody ; Adrian Farrel  
Subject: [Pce] draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-te-data-extn

Dear PCE WG,

We presented the PCEP-LS [1] I-D [2] in the IETF 110 with a quick recap and a 
summary of past discussions. Some new scenarios such as PCECC, H-PCE were 
highlighted where the PCEP session could be reused. 

This is an experimental I-D with the aim to progress research and development 
efforts. This work is not a replacement for any of the existing mechanisms. 
There are specific scenarios highlighted where the reuse of PCEP sessions for 
this information is deemed useful. To make progress, it may not be useful to 
rehash the beauty context between everyone's favorite protocol :). What would 
be useful would be - finding out if there is still interest in this 
experimental work by some in the WG; are there strong technical objections for 
the experiment in its limited scope etc... 

As a next step, it would be good to define the scope of the experiments and 
expected output especially targeting the scalability concerns as well as impact 
in other protocols and the network, etc.   

Thanks! 
Gyan (on behalf of co-authors)

[1] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/materials/slides-110-pce-42-pcep-ls-00.pdf
 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/materials/slides-110-pce-42-pcep-ls-00.pdf
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls/ 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls/
==

 http://www.verizon.com/
Gyan Mishra
Network Solutions Architect 
Email gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com mailto:gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com
M 301 502-1347

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce