Re: [Pce] Supporting PCEP-LS work as PCE WG's WG item
Hi, We have implemented PCEP-LS for packet optical network which was demonstrated in IETF 97 B&B. The inter-operability of PCEP-LS was demonstrated across ETRI, KT and Woori-Net. I support PCEP-LS to be adopted in the PCE WG. We think that PCEP can provide one of ways to implement all of the main functions of SDN controller. So, we want PCE WG to provide a total solution to implement SDN controller as much as it can rather than using other WG's protocols such as BGP-LS. Thanks. BIn 보낸 사람 : "박춘걸(Transport SDN Project)" 보낸 날짜 : 2016-11-25 09:19:42 ( +09:00 ) 받는 사람 : pce@ietf.org 참조 : 제목 : [Pce] Supporting PCEP-LS work as PCE WG's WG item Dear experts of PCE WG, I’m Peter Park one of a senior researcher of KT Infra Lab. During IETF B&B in Seoul, KT demonstrated resilient ACTN architecture with ETRI and other vendor using PCEP-LS using PCEP-LS for packet optical network to quickly determined network failure and reported to the MDSC using PCEP Report mechanism. I believe PCEP-LS is an important work for us. And I strongly support PCEP-LS to be considered as PCE WG’s WG item Thank you, Peter Dr. Peter(Choongul) Park Senior Researcher / KT Infra Lab. 463-1 Cheonmindong Yuseonggu Daejeon Korea(South) T: +82.10.2879.7463 / F: +82.42.870.8089 이 메일은 지정된 수취인만을 위해 작성되었으며, 중요한 정보나 저작권을 포함하고 있을 수 있습니다. 어떠한 권한 없이, 본 문서에 포함된 정보의 전부 또는 일부를 무단으로 제3자에게 공개, 배포, 복사 또는 사용하는 것을 엄격히 금지합니다. 만약, 본 메일이 잘못 전송된 경우, 발신인 또는 당사에 알려주시고, 본 메일을 즉시 삭제하여 주시기 바랍니다. This E-mail may contain confidential information and/or copyright material. This email is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you receive this email by mistake, please either delete it without reproducing, distributing or retaining copies thereof or notify the sender immediately. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhody-pce-applicability-actn-02
Yes/Support. Sincerely yours, Binyeong From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 1:26 AM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-dhody-pce-applicability-a...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhody-pce-applicability-actn-02 All, This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-dhody-pce-applicability-actn-02 a PCE working group document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-applicability-actn/ Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your reasons. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. The poll ends on Tuesday, May 9. Many thanks, Jon ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-hpce
Yes/Support. Regards, Bin From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 9:25 PM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-h...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-hpce All, This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-hpce-03 a PCE working group document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-hpce/ Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your reasons. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. The poll ends on Thursday, June 15. Many thanks, Jon ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adoption poll for draft-lee-pce-flexible-grid
Hi Adrian, Yes/Support. I think that this document is valuable for the PCE to support the full control functions over transport networks(including the flexgrid case). Best regards, Bin 보낸 사람 : "Adrian Farrel" 보낸 날짜 : 2019-02-05 23:16:44 ( +09:00 ) 받는 사람 : pce@ietf.org 참조 : 제목 : [Pce] Adoption poll for draft-lee-pce-flexible-grid Hi WG, Please read and review draft-lee-pce-flexible-grid-03 and send your comments to the mailing list. Should we adopt it? Why / why not? What needs to be fixed before/after adoption? Is this a draft you would be willing to work on? Do you plan to implement? This poll will run until 20th February. Thanks, PCE Chairs ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG Last Call completed for draft-ietf-pce-applicability-actn
Dear Adrian and WG, I have reviewed the draft. I support the publication. Best regards, Bin 보낸 사람 : "Adrian Farrel" 보낸 날짜 : 2019-02-25 21:55:15 ( +09:00 ) 받는 사람 : pce@ietf.org 참조 : 제목 : [Pce] WG Last Call completed for draft-ietf-pce-applicability-actn Hi, The WG last call completed without any dissent, but with only a few comments of support. There were some issues raised (including from Dan and me). Authors: Please post a revision that addresses the comments. Working Group: Please continue to send messages of support so that we know that this draft really should be advanced. Thanks, Adrian -Original Message- From: Pce On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: 08 February 2019 11:34 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-pce-applicability-actn Hi WG, draft-ietf-pce-applicability-actn seems to be ready to progress towards publication. This email starts a two week working group last call (ends on 23rd February). During this time, please read the draft and make comments for improvement. If you then support its publication please let us know that you have read the draft and support it. If you have any concerns, please let us know and propose solutions. Thanks, Adrian ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association
Yes/Support. I think that it is useful to provide a solution for VN service based on PCE. Best regards, Bin 보낸 사람 : "Adrian Farrel" 보낸 날짜 : 2019-07-14 22:01:05 ( +09:00 ) 받는 사람 : pce@ietf.org 참조 : draft-leedhody-pce-vn-associat...@ietf.org 제목 : [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association Hi WG, He authors of draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association have been asking for adoption and... - the base PCEP association extensions seem to be stable and advancing - I did an early review and the authors span a new version So, this starts an adoption poll for the draft. Because IETF-105 is imminent and you all have lots to do and read, we'll make this a three week poll ending on 4th August. Please send your comments of support or antipathy. In either case, please indicate whether or not you have read the draft, and if you support it, please say whether or not you propose to and even possibly implement the draft. Many thanks, Adrian (for the chairs) ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-te-data-extn
Hi Gyan, We have implemented PCEP in the past. This experimental upgrade of PCEP to enable direct TE updates to PCE is worth to try and we'd be interested in the implementation of this work. Regards, Bin From: Gyan MishraSent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 11:36 AM To: pce@ietf.org; draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep...@ietf.org; Dhruv Dhody ; Adrian Farrel Subject: [Pce] draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-te-data-extn Dear PCE WG, We presented the PCEP-LS [1] I-D [2] in the IETF 110 with a quick recap and a summary of past discussions. Some new scenarios such as PCECC, H-PCE were highlighted where the PCEP session could be reused. This is an experimental I-D with the aim to progress research and development efforts. This work is not a replacement for any of the existing mechanisms. There are specific scenarios highlighted where the reuse of PCEP sessions for this information is deemed useful. To make progress, it may not be useful to rehash the beauty context between everyone's favorite protocol :). What would be useful would be - finding out if there is still interest in this experimental work by some in the WG; are there strong technical objections for the experiment in its limited scope etc... As a next step, it would be good to define the scope of the experiments and expected output especially targeting the scalability concerns as well as impact in other protocols and the network, etc. Thanks! Gyan (on behalf of co-authors) [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/materials/slides-110-pce-42-pcep-ls-00.pdf https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/materials/slides-110-pce-42-pcep-ls-00.pdf [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls/ == http://www.verizon.com/ Gyan Mishra Network Solutions Architect Email gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com mailto:gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com M 301 502-1347 ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce